+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box...

ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box...

Date post: 12-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: ernest-mcdonald
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
28
ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using neutron activation analysis on mineral and biological samples: environmental and medical studies
Transcript
Page 1: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

ANA PANTELICĂ

“Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900

Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania

Experience of using neutron activation analysis on mineral and biological

samples: environmental and medical studies

Page 2: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

IntroductionMain achievements from environmental and medical studies, based on a thirty-year experience

in applying Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA) on different mineral and biological samples at “Horia Hulubei” National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering in Bucharest are presented.

Neutron irradiation was carried out at the VVR-S reactor in Bucharest (short and long-term irradiation) and TRIGA reactor in Pitesti (long-term irradiation) after VVR-S reactor shutdown in 1997, at a neutron fluence rate of 2.3·1012 cm-2·s-1, and 1-3 ·1013 cm-2·s-1, respectively.

Elements investigated by INAA on environmental samples: Ag, As, Au, Ba, Br, Ca, Cd, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Eu, Fe, Hf, Hg, K, La, Lu, Mo, Na, Nd, Ni, Rb, Sb, Sc, Se, Sm, Sr, Ta, Tb, Th, U, W, Yb, Zn and Zr by long-term irradiation, and Al, Cl, Cu, Dy, I, Mg, Mn, Ti and V by short-term irradiation (44 elements).

As standards, reference materials such as W-1 and GSP rocks, IAEA-Soil 7, MA-M-2/TM mussel, MA-B-3/TM fish, IAEA-140 sea weed, WTM water sludge and EOP fly coal ash from the Institute of Radioecology and Applied Nuclear Techniques Kosice (Slovakia), as well as chemical compounds of Al, Ca, Mg, Mn and V were used.

Monostandard method was in addition applied in some cases (e.g. Ti and Sr analytes, with Cl and Zn as monostandards, respectively).

Experimental• For short half-lived radionuclides, irradiation time of 15 s for sediment, 30 s for water residues,

and 45-60 s for biological samples at VVR-S reactor (pneumatic rabbit), decay time of 2-50 min, counting time of 2-10 min were chosen.

• For medium and long half-life radionuclides, irradiation time of 4 h at VVR-S reactor, and of 1-2 h at the TRIGA reactor, decay time of 4-5 d, 7-10 d, and 25-30 d, counting time of about 0.5 h, 1.5 h, and 5-22 h, corresponding to three counting runs were used.

Quality control in INAA was periodically checked on various mineral and biological Reference Materials from intercomparison runs (major, minor and trace element certification).

Page 3: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

INAA standardization:

- relative method, based on multielement standards (appropriate Reference Materials), as well as on chemical compounds as comparators was used especially for short half-life isotopes (e.g. Al, Ca, Cl, Mn, V).

- monostandard method was complementary used for elements not present or not well determined in the multielement standard (e.g. for Au, Ga, Ag, Hg, Sr determination as standards are taken Na, Co, Fe, Zn).

• Data processing:

- GAMMAW program for automatic and semi-automatic spectra processing

[W. Westmeier. GAMMAW. Version 17.11. Gesellschaft für Kernspektrometrie mbH Consulting, Software, Instruments, Ebsdorfergrund-Mölln, 1996].

- Program to determine concentration values as well as the corresponding statistical counting errors in relative INAA method.

Introduction (continued)

Page 4: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

I. Danube River and Black Sea pollution study

Samples investigated: sediment, water and biota (flora and fauna).

Collaboration with University “Politehnica” Bucharest (Prof. Dr. Iulia I. Georgescu) and National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management (Dr. C. Borcia).

Element concentration levels of water and sediments were collected from ~20 transects of the Romanian sector of the Danube River, from Bazias, km 1072 to the Black Sea mouths (Danube Delta included) and from the Black Sea coast.

Surface water and bottom sediments were collected by NIHWM in expeditionary campaigns, in according with standard methodologies, on different transects along the Danube river, from its entrance in Romania (km 1072.4) to the Black Sea (Danube mouths) and on the Black Sea coast (6.5-37 km offshore, 21-31 m depths to the floor of the sea).

The biota samples examined consisted in:

- marine algae (e.g. Enteromorpha linza as Clorophytes and Ceramium rubrum as Rhodophytes),

- marine molluscs (Mytilus galloprovincialis and Mya arenaria), polychaete (Melina palmata), and crustacea (Mesopodopsis slabberi Van Bened of Mysidacea specie)

- Danube River fish (Alburnus alburnus, Acipenser ruthenus, Carasius auratus, Cyrinus carpio, Ctenopharingodon idaella, Perca fluviatilis, Rutilus rutilus, and Silurus glanis).

Page 5: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Sampling site/ Date Distance(km)

Name of sample

Dry water residue(g L-1)

Weight loss of sediment at 1000 ºC (%)

Bazias/ 18.5.96 1072.4 Baziaş 0.2241 9.10

Orsova/ 19.5.96 957 Orsova 0.2174 6.90

Turnu Severin/ 19.5.96 932 T. Severin 0.2452 not collected

Calafat/ 21.5.96 787.9 Calafat not analyzed 2.86

Bechet (upstream)/ 22.5.96 709 Bechet u. not analyzed 10.87

Bechet (downstream)/ 22.5.96 679 Bechet d. 0.2180 2.10

Turnu Magurele/ 23.5.96 596.3 Magurele 0.2232 4.08

Giurgiu/ 25.5.96 493 Giurgiu 0.1414 2.08

Chiciu Calarasi/ 27.5.96 379.6 Chiciu 0.1905 4.87

Cernavoda (upstream)/ 27.5.96 303 Cern.303 0.1550 2.50

Cernavoda (channel)/ 27.5.96 300 Cern.300 0.1256 6.00

Cernavoda (downstream)/27.5.96 297 Cern.297 0.1908 3.86

Vadu Oii/ 29.5.96 238 Vadu Oii 0.2152 2.40

Braila/ 5.6.96 167 Braila 0.2122 2.50

Ceatal Izmail/ 7.6.96 80.9 Ceatal Iz. 0.2236 3.68

Ceatal Sfantu Gheorghe/ 14.6.96 63 Ceatal SG 0.2346 1.97

Sfantu Gheorghe/14.6.96 8 Sf. Ghe. 0.2366 4.00

Sulina Port/ 11.6.96 4.6 Sulina 0.2332 3.00

Stambulul Vechi/ 10.6.96 4 Stambul 0.2470 5.00

East Sulina/ 27.4.96 ─ E-Sulina 11.667 14.93

East Portita/ 25.4.96 ─ E. Portita 7.319 14.40

East Constanta/ 6.5.96 ─ Constanta 13.878 10.47

Page 6: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Danube River and Black Sea water

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Turnu Severin

Turnu Magurele

Al Fe Mn x 10

Cerna

voda

(dow

nstre

am)

East Portita

East

Cons

tanta

East

Sulin

a

Suli

na

Ceata

l Sf.G

heorg

he

Brail

a

Cerna

voda

(ups

tream

)

Giurg

iu

Stamb. Vechi

SfantuGhe.

CeatalIzmail

Vadu Oii

Cernav. (chann.)

Chiciu Calarasi

Bec

het (d

owns

tream

)

Bazias

Orso

va

Con

cen

tra

tion

, µ

g·L-1

(Spring 1996)

WATER

Page 7: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Danube River and Black Sea sediment

Page 8: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Danube River and Black Sea water

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

6

8

10

Con

stan

ta

Sulina-Est

Sulin

a

Cea

tal S

f. G

heor

ghe

Bra

ila

Cer

navo

da (a

val)

Cer

navo

da (a

mon

te)

Giu

rgiuB

eche

t (av

al)

GuraPortita

Stambulul Vechi

SfantuGheorghe

Ceatal Izmail

Vadu OiiCernavoda (canal)

ChiciuCalarasi

TurnuMagurele

TurnuSeverin

Ors

ova

Bazias

Con

cent

ratio

n, µ

g / L

(Spring 1996)

WATER Sb Co Hg

Page 9: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Danube River and Black Sea sediment

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Cr V Zn

Cernav.downstr.

East

Portit

a

East Const.

East Sulina

SulinaCeatal Sf.Ghe.

BrailaCernav.upstr.

GiurgiuBechet downstr.St

ambu

lul V

echi

Sf. G

heorg

heCeata

l Izma

il

Vadu

Oii

Cernavoda (channel)

Chici

u Cala

rasi

Turnu

Mag

urele

Bec

het u

pstre

am

CalafatBazias

Orsova

Con

cent

ratio

n, m

g·kg

-1

(Spring 1996)SEDIMENT

Page 10: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Conclusions

• It can be seen that, both for water and sediment samples, the highest contents of Al, Co, Cs, Fe, Rb, and Sb were found at the sites located upstream Portile de Fier (the Iron Gates) dam: at Turnu Severin (for water) and Orsova (for sediments).

• In the case of water other elements having the highest concentrations at Turnu Severin are Ce, Cr, Hf, La, Mn, Sc, Sm, Sr, Th, V. Relative high elemental contents were determined in the Danube delta at Ceatal Sfantu Gheorghe (Sb, Zn), Sfantu Gheorghe (Co, Cr, Mn, V), Sulina (Hg), and Stambulul Vechi (Hg, Zn), at Bazias, Orsova, Turnu Magurele (Al, Ce, Co, Eu, Fe, La, Sm, Sc, Th) and at Turnu Severin (Zn).

• Ag, Au, Ni, Yb, Zr were determined only in some of the water samples at the following concentration levels: ng L-1 (Au, Lu), tens of ng L-1 (Ag, Tb, Yb),hundreds of ng L-1 (Ag), µg L-1 (Ni, Zr), tens of µg L-1 (Ni, Ti). The highest values are found at Turnu Severin for Ag, Au and Yb, at Baziaş for Ni, while Zr has a rather uniform distribution along the river.

• A comparison of the concentrations of Au, Ba, Ca, Cl, Co, Cr, Fe, Hg, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Se, Yb and Zn in the Danube water with the maximum permissible limits for the surface waters, shows that the limits were exceeded for Fe (at Bazias and Turnu Severin, by a factor of about 2 and 3 respectively) and Zn (at Stambulul Vechi by a factor of about 1.6).

• In the case of sediments,the highest concentrations were found at Orsova for As, Ba, Br, K, V, Zn, at Braila for Cr, Mn, Ta, Ti, at Ceatal Sfantu Gheorghe for Hg and Se, at Stambul Vechi for Th and U. Relative high values were found at Cernavoda-km 300 (at about 300 m along the Danube-Black Sea man-made channel, in the vicinity of the CANDU Nuclear Power Plant) for almost all the elements determined The variation of SiO2 lies in the range 42.3 % at East Portita and 87.5 % at Ceatal Sfantu Gheorghe. The level of P2O5 was found ranging between 0.04 % at East Constanta and 0.15 % at East Portita.

• The other elements found in sediments are at the following levels: ng kg-1 (Au), hundreds of ng kg-1 (Ag, Hg, Lu, Se, W), mg kg-1 (Ga, Hg, Mo, Nd, Se, W), tens of mg kg-1 (Ga, Hg, Nd, Ni, Se), hundreds of mg kg-1 (Cu), (15050) mg kg-1 (Cl, at Sulina), and in the range of (4.40.5)(6.00.5) g kg-1 (Cl, for the Black Sea sediments).

Page 11: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

II. Air pollution studies1. Air pollution (PM10) at Bucharest-Magurele and Stuttgart-Hohenheim was in parallel

investigated, during one year (1 Nov. 1993 and 31 Oct. 1994), by a weekly collection of airborne particulate matter on filters.

(German-Romanian BMBF Joint Project X055.1/1993-1995 Collaborations with Dr. V. Cercasov and Prof. H. Schreiber, and Institute of Physics and Meteorology, Univ. Hohenheim in Stuttgart, Germany}.

2. The suitability of three lichen species as bioaccumulators of trace elements from atmospheric deposition in zones with different pollution levels and different climates in Germany, Italy and Romania (two locations in every country - Bucharest and Târgoviste in Romania). The investigated species Cetraria islandica, Evernia prunastri and Ramalina farinacea were transplanted from a non-polluted Prealps area in Italy and exposed during 2, 4, 6 and 12 months.

(German-Romanian BMBF Joint Project RUM-020-96/1995-1998 - Dr. V. Cercasov, Univ. Hohenheim in Stuttgart, Germany and Prof. G. Caniglia, Univ. Padua, Italy).

3. Characterization of air pollution at six locations with different types of industrial activity (Afumati, Baia Mare, Copsa Mica, Deva, Galati, Oradea) and a background site (Fundata) in Romania using transplant lichen bioaccumulators (Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea exposed during 6 and 12 months), bulk (wet and dry) deposition, and airborne particulate matter collection on filters.

ICA1-CT-2000-70023 Center of Excellence EU Project IDRANAP (InterDisciplinary Research and Applications based on Nuclear and Atomic Physics, WP2), during 2000-2004

Collaboration with Univ. Hohenheim in Stuttgart, Germany (Dr. V. Cercasov), IRI TU Delft, The Netherlands (Dr. B. Wolterbeek and Dr. P. Bode) and Norwegian Univ. Trondheim, Norway (Prof. E. Steinnes).

Page 12: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Transplant lichen biomonitoring

Comparison of elemental concentrations in Pseudevernia furfuracea before exposure (“zero level”) and after 12- months exposure at Copsa Mica (non-ferrous

industry), Deva (coal-fired power plant and cement industry) and Galati (metallurgical industry)

Page 13: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Enrichment Factors for Evernia prunastri after 6 months of exposure

Element Afumaţi Baia Mare Copşa Mică Deva Fundata Galaţi Oradea

Ag 3.3 ± 0.9 20.2 ± 4.6 409 ± 94 5.8 ± 1.5 1.9 ± 0.5 3.5 ± 0.9 2.5 ± 0.7

As 3.1 ± 0.7 7.8 ± 1.7 78 ± 17 3.4 ± 0.8 1.6 ± 0.4 5.6 ± 1.2 2.3 ± 0.5

Au 2.2 ± 0.9 5.2 ± 2.1 12.6 ± 5.0 2.1 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 0.7 1.5 ± 0.6 1.2 ± 0.5

Br 1.1 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.3 0.8 ± 0.2

Ca 0.8 ±0.2 0.9 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.3 0.6 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.4 0.6 ± 0.2

Cd 0.9 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.1 351 ± 9 3.5 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1

Co 3.2 ± 0.8 2.0 ± 0.5 14.7 ± 3.4 2.5 ± 0.6 1.4 ± 0.3 4.5 ± 1.0 2.0 ± 0.5

Cr 3.2 ± 0.9 1.5 ± 0.4 3.6 ± 1.1 3.1 ± 0.9 1.1 ± 0.3 3.9 ± 1.1 1.8 ± 0.5

Cu 1.6 ± 0.8 2.6 ± 1.3 38 ± 19 1.3 ± 0.7 0.7 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.7 1.1 ± 0.6

Fe 3.7 ± 1.0 2.1 ± 0.5 4.9 ± 1.3 2.8 ± 0.7 1.2 ± 0.3 10.1 ± 2.7 2.1 ± 0.5

K 0.8 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1 0.25 ± 0.04 0.7 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1

Mn 0.9 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.3 0.4 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.4 0.8 ± 0.2

Ni 2.5 ± 0.5 1.2 ± 0.3 3.5 ± 0.8 2.1 ± 0.4 0.7 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.3

Pb 5.7 ± 1.9 9.6 ± 3.2 700 ± 233 11.1 ± 3.7 1.4 ± 0.4 3.0 ± 1.0 2.1 ± 0.7

S 3.2 ± 0.6 1.7 ± 0.3 8.4 ± 1.5 2.0 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.2 3.9 ± 0.7 2.0 ± 0.3

Sb 3.5 ± 1.2 2.2 ± 0.7 194 ± 62 2.1 ± 0.7 0.8 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.7 1.2 ± 0.4

Se 2.1 ± 0.5 4.4 ±1.2 18.5 ± 4.6 2.6 ± 0.6 1.2 ± 0.3 3.2 ± 0.9 1.7 ± 0.7

V 5.8 ± 3.8 1.2 ± 0.7 1.2 ± 0.8 1.4 ± 0.9 0.8 ± 0.5 3.9 ± 2.5 1.0 ± 0.7

Zn 1.8 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.4 280 ± 61 4.1 ± 0.9 1.1 ± 0.3 2.1 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 0.4

Page 14: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Fe, V and Zn in bulk deposition (μg) compared with lichen enrichment (mg kg-1) during 6 months of exposure

Page 15: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Conclusions

• Both Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea lichen species showed significant enrichments in almost all of the investigated elements (Ag, As, Au, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, S, Sb, Se, V, and Zn).

• In correlation with the total deposition, their magnitude was found to differ strongly from one location to another, as a function of the atmospheric availability of these trace elements.

• The values of the element concentrations determined in air, relative to a “reference station”, confirmed the pollution pattern shown by the bioaccumulators.

• The relative degree of air pollution due to the anthropogenic and/or natural (crustal) contribution at six locations in Romania, relative to the background site Fundata, could be described by the following relationships:

a) Anthropogenic contribution:Copşa Mică >> Baia Mare > Afumaţi, Galaţi, Deva > Oradea.b) Crustal contribution: Galaţi > Afumaţi > Copşa Mică > Deva > Baia Mare, Oradea.

The anthropogenic pollution was mainly due to the following types of industrial activities: non-ferrous (Copşa Mică), metallurgic (Galaţi), coal power plant and cement factory (Deva), non-ferrous mining (Baia Mare), agriculture and mixed industry (Afumaţi, near Bucharest), traffic and mixed industry (Oradea).

Page 16: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

III. Environmental impact of TURNU fertiliser plant

Samples investigated:

- soil and vegetation (tree leaves, potato, carrot, and corn) collected at different distances from the plant;

- workplace air (airborne particulate matter and dust deposition) and

tap water;

- hair and nail biosubstrates from the occupational exposure.

EU INCO-Copernicus project «Workplace monitoring and occupational health-related studies at some selected phosphate fertilizer plants in Russia, Uzbekistan, Poland, and Romania» (2000-2003)

Collaboration with Univ. “Politehnica” Bucharest (Prof. E. Pincovschi – Project coordinator in Romania) and JINR Dubna (Dr. M. Frontasyeva);

EU Project co-ordinator: Dr. P. Bode, IRI-TU Delft, The Netherlands.

Page 17: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Concentration levels in soil samples in the vicinity of the fertilizer plant

Page 18: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Ratio to control for elemental concentrations in crop vegetation and host soil in the vicinity of TURNU plant

Page 19: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Conclusions

• Variation with the distance to the plant of the elemental concentrations in soil samples were observed as follows: - Decreasing of Ag, As, Au, Co, Fe, K, Ni, Rb, Sb, Sc, Se and Zn concentration; - Increasing of Rare Earths, Sr and Zr concentration, with a maximum at 10 km; - Increasing of Ca concentration on East and West directions, with no regular variation on Northeast and Northwest directions.

• Relative to the control zone, significant higher concentrations were found for various elements in carrot and potato, and to a lower degree also in the maize (ear of corn) grown in the vicinity of the fertiliser plant.

• Both potato and carrot pulp were found to accumulate Fe, Th, Ce, Cr, and Sb, their concentration ratio to control samples ranging between 2 and 10 for the potato and ranging between 50 and 113 for carrot samples. In addition, carrot pulp was found to accumulate As, La, Se, Zn, Sr and U (concentration ratios between 3 and 36).

• Fe, Mg, Mn, Ca, Cl, and K concentration values in carrot pulp, as well as Fe and Cl in potato pulp were found to exceed the normal levels, while those of As, Zn, and Hg were found to be lower than the maximum allowable levels in Romania.

• Ratios below unity in the vicinity of the fertiliser plant were determined for Br, Cs, and Rb in all maize samples examined.

Page 20: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

IV. Trace elements in tumoral skin tissues

Modifications of trace elements concentration in four types of tumoral skin tissues were assessed relative to a normal tissue.

VIASAN / R&D program of the Ministry of Education and Research in Romania, during 2001-2004.

Collaboration with "Carol Davila" Medicine and Pharmacy University

Malign tumors:

Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) – 7

Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) - 2

Malignant Melanoma (MM) - 4

Benign tumor: Nevocytic Nevus (NN) tissue -2

Control samples: skin tissue from patients suffering of cutaneous cancer, but from a normal area determined by a histopathological diagnose - 5 .

Page 21: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

INAA in medical field (continued)

Ratios of the elemental concentrations in tumor relative to normal skin tissue (SCC - Squamous Cell Carcinoma, BCC - Basal Cell Carcinoma, MM – Melanoma, NN – Nevocytic Nevus).

Hg K Na Rb Sb Se Sm Sr Zn Zr0.1

1

10

Ag Au Ba Br Ca Ce Co Cr Cs Eu Fe0.1

1

10

Tu

mo

r / N

orm

alT

um

or

/ No

rmal

SCC BCC MM NN

Page 22: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Conclusions For some of the elements measured an enhancement of

concentration in different tumor tissues (especially in the benign one) was observed by comparing with the normal tissue: e.g. Ag, Au, Ba, Ca, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Eu, Fe, Rb, Sb, Sm, Sr, Zn, Zr in the NN type benign tumor, as well as Sb in all types of the tumor tissues examined.

These results are in agreement with those we previously obtained by PIXE for P, S and K, as well as in a smaller degree for Ca, Fe and Zn (Ciortea et al., 2002).

Similarly, an enhancement of Zn content in skin carcinoma was determined by Allen et al., 1978.

These results suggest that important disturbances could appear in malign and benign skin tumor tissues during their growth, both for essential and non-essential elements.

Page 23: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

• 1. Sediment• IAEA-SD-M-2/TM (1988)• IAEA-356 (1992)• 2. Soil IAEA-Soil 7 (1984)• S-VM, S-MS, S-SP (Kosice, Slovakia, 1992)• SO-1 (Krakow, Poland. 1986)• 3. Fly coal ash• ENO, EOP, ECH (Kosice, Slovakia. 1984)• 4. Water sludge• WT-L, WT-M, WT-H (Kosice, Slovakia, 1995)• 5. Copper smelting flue dust• KHK (Kosice, Slovakia, 1988)• 6. Uranium phosphate ores• IAEA/S-17, S-18, S-19 (1984)• 7. Plants• IAEA-331 (spinach), 1993• IAEA-359 (cabbage), 1993• CL-1 (cabbage leaves), Krakow, Poland, 1986 • P- Alfalfa (lucerne), Kosice, Slovakia• P-ACHK (green algae), Kosice, Slovakia (1989)• IAEA-0140 (Fucus sp. - marine algae, 1996)• IAEA-0390 (three different level algae IAEA-0391/ IAEA-0392/ IAEA-0393), 1996

INCT-TL-1 (Tea leaves), INCT-MPH-2 (Mixed Polish herbs), 2002INCT-CF-3 (Corn Flour), INCT-SB-4 (Soya Bean Flour), 2004 (in progress)

8. Biological materials• IAEA-V8 (rye flour), 1982• MP-1 (wheat flour), Krakow, Poland, 1988• IAEA-155 (milk powder), 1989• IAEA-MA-M-2/TM (mussel homogenate), 1985• IAEA-MA-B-3/TM (shrimp tissue), 1988• IAEA-350 (tuna fish, 1989)

International Intercomparison Runs (24 exercises, 37 Reference Materials)

Page 24: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Dubna Moscow UzbekistanGdansk Bucharest DelftINAA XRF

F -7,26Na 1,32 2,47 -0,83 2,28 0,53Mg 9,19 0,27Al -4,41 2,82K 1,27 0,67 0,62 0,43 -0,65 0,89Ca -1,78 3,30 -0,64 -0,27 0,98Sc -0,43 1,13 -1,72 -0,16 0,01Ti 1,93 1,10 -7,46 0,03V -2,47 2,58 -0,01Cr -1,13 0,19 -2,53 0,03 -0,15 0,88Mn 0,04 0,95 -2,85 -0,85 0,35Fe -1,22 1,58 -2,27 -0,14 0,36 -0,48Co 0,00 0,00 0,34 0,32 -0,09Ni -0,41 -0,05 0,37 1,42Cu 0,39 1,01Zn -1,31 0,08 0,16 1,48 -1,80Ga 1,33 0,03As -1,30 0,31 -0,42 -0,17 2,44Se -2,97 -1,97 -2,16Br 3,14 2,36 -0,13 -1,52 -0,15 1,34Rb -0,47 -0,27 -5,39 0,17 -0,57 -0,02Sr -0,53 0,00 0,46 0,39Y 0,28 0,67Zr -0,05 1,96 9,14 -0,04NbMo -1,27 -0,37Cd -0,51 1,29Sn 2,35Sb 0,84 -0,66 -0,61 0,52 0,53I -17,00 -0,08Cs 0,00 0,51 -0,49 -0,04 0,25 0,00Ba -1,16 0,24 -0,12 0,18 0,44La 0,15 1,03 -0,07 0,02 -0,28 -0,30Ce 1,02 1,07 0,98 0,81 2,02Nd -3,67 1,68 -10,50 -1,12Sm -0,83 -2,08 1,28 0,01Eu -0,04 0,00 -0,01 0,01Tb 0,02 -0,02 0,00 -0,01 0,00Yb 0,00 -1,35 -0,06Lu -0,10 0,00Hf -0,33 0,03 0,02 0,00Ta 0,21 0,04W 10,46 0,28 0,03Au -1,04 0,00Pb 0,19 -5,41 2,63Th 0,49 0,63 -0,27 0,40 0,93U 0,09 -0,10 -0,44 -0,11 -0,06 -0,07

En scores of the participants for the analysis of the intercomparison sample.

Page 25: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

IAEA-0140 Fucus sp. - marine seaweed, mg·kg-1,*g·kg-1 (1998)

109 laboratories from 51 countries (60 elements)

Elem. Overall mean Our value Z - score Confidence interval N

As 44.3 36.8 ± 0.7 -1.4 42.2 - 46.4 28

Br 567 551 ± 15 -0.2 473 - 661 9

*Ca 12.73 11.90 ± 0.36 -0.5 10.97 - 14.49 15

Co 0.876 0.787 ± 0.079 -0.2 0.746 - 1.01 40

Cr 10.4 10.67 ± 0.32 0.2 9.6 - 11.2 68

Fe 1256 1143 ± 32 -0.7 1221 - 1291 66

*K 31.1 30.94 ± 0.93 0.0 28.5 – 33.7 11

*Mg 9.07 7.36 ± 0.38 -1.5 8.19 - 9.95 7

Mn 56.1 57.2 ± 1.3 0.2 53.7 – 58.5 66

*Na 32.0 35.24 ± 0.35 0.8 25.4 – 38.6 7

Rb 16.4 12.2 ± 0.9 -2.0 14.1 – 18.7 10

Sb 0.103 0.12 ± 0.03 1.3 0.081 - 0.125 14

Sr 750 370 ± 29 -4.0 655 – 845 30

Th 0.299 0.33 ± 0.03 0.8 0.237 - 0.361 10

V 3.67 3.57 ± 0.25 -0.2 3.19 - 4.15 19

Zn 47.3 44.9 ± 1.3 -0.4 45.3 – 49.3 91

Page 26: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Elem. Lab. value SD Certified 2·SD u-testAs 0.191 0.035 0.191 0.023 - 0.01Ba 29.8 1.6 32.5 2.5 - 0.90Br 8.28 0.19 7.71 0.61 0.89Ca 10589 795 10800 700 - 0.20Ce 1.16 0.11 1.12 0.10 0.27Co 0.212 0.000 0.210 0.025 0.08Cr 1.71 0.12 1.69 0.13 0.13

Cs 0.073 0.002 0.076 0.007 - 0.44

Eu 0.0150 0.000 0.0157 0.0018 - 0.38

K 20525 434 19100 1200 1.12La 0.590 0.021 0.571 0.046 0.38Lu 0.0068 0.0020 0.009 0.0015 - 0.87Ni 1.40 0.17 1.57 0.16 - 0.72

Rb 10.9 0.1 10.7 0.7 0.33

Sb 0.064 0.003 0.0655 0.01 - 0.13

Sc 0.117 0.003 0.123 0.009 - 0.60

Sm 0.084 0.004 0.0944 0.0082 - 1.11

Sr 42.8 2.0 37.6 2.7 1.55

Ta 0.019 0.003 0.0186 0.0023 0.12

Tb 0.012 0.003 0.0135 0.0011 - 0.59

Th 0.138 0.010 0.154 0.013 - 0.99

Yb 0.047 0.015 0.0527 0.0066 - 0.36

Zn 33.2 0.6 33.5 2.1 - 0.15

INCT-MPH-2 (Mixed Polish Herbs) - 109 labs, 19 countries

Page 27: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Elem. Lab. value SD Certified 2·SD u-test

As 0.132 0.018 0.106 0.021 0.94

Ba 33.9 1.6 43.2 3.9 - 2.21

Br 12.6 0.3 12.3 1.0 0.32

Ca 5842 132 5820 520 0.04

Ce 0.725 0.079 0.790 0.076 - 0.59

Co 0.416 0.006 0.387 0.042 0.68

Cr 1.74 0.13 1.91 0.22 - 0.66

Cs 3.61 0.07 3.61 0.37 0.01

Eu 0.0478 0.0017 0.0499 0.0094 - 0.22

K 17867 688 17000 1200 0.63

La 1.01 0.02 1.00 0.070 0.19

Lu 0.0139 0.0022 0.0168 0.0024 - 0.91

Na 21.4 1.7 24.7 3.2 - 0.91

Ni 5.50 0.82 6.12 0.52 - 0.64

Rb 81.0 1.2 81.5 6.5 - 0.07

Sc 0.245 0.004 0.266 0.024 - 0.88

Sm 0.152 0.002 0.177 0.022 - 1.13

Sr 24.6 1.7 20.8 1.7 1.59

Tb 0.0229 0.006 0.0265 0.0024 - 0.53

Th 0.030 0.006 0.0343 0.0048 - 0.55

Yb 0.102 0.004 0.118 0.013 - 1.19

Zn 35.6 0.9 34.7 2.7 0.32

INCT-TL-1 (Tea Leaves) - 109 labs, 19 countries

Page 28: ANA PANTELICĂ “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6. 76900 Bucharest- Măgurele, Romania Experience of using.

Elem. Unity Overall mean

Our value Confidence interval

Range of accepted laboratory means

Ag mg kg-1 11.9 ± 1.0 9.7 ± 0.3 10.6 – 12.5 9.1 – 14.6

Al g kg-1 30.3 ± 1.3 29.6 ± 0.9 28.9 – 31.6 23.2 – 34.4

As mg kg-1 8.87 ± 1.08 11.43 ± 0.93 7.69 – 9.85 5.43 – 11.57

Ba mg kg-1 781 ± 34 839 ± 41 754 – 823 685 – 862

Ca g kg-1 80 ± 3.5 87.4 ± 1.2 84.2 – 91.2 76.1 – 109.0

Co mg kg-1 6.77 ± 0.75 6.94 ± 0.21 6.12 – 7.61 3.76 – 11.41

Cr mg kg-1 79.0 ± 8.3 93.0 ± 11.5 72.6 – 89.3 44.5 – 127.7

Cu mg kg-1 136 ± 7 159.5 ± 0.7 134 – 147 105.3 – 174.7

Fe g kg-1 17.0 ± 1.1 19.0 ± 0.4 16.3 – 18.4 11.2 – 21.2

Hg mg kg-1 4.25 ± 0.34 4.13 ± 0.22 3.96 – 4.65 3.28 –5.94

Mn mg kg-1 390 ± 15 381 ± 5 378 – 408 332 – 452

Sb mg kg-1 17.8 ± 2.4 22.9 ± 0.4 15.5 – 20.3 12.17 –24.9

Sr mg kg-1 170 ± 19 182 ± 40 154 – 193 117 – 249

V mg kg-1 41.3 ± 3.1 40.8 ± 0.8 37.6 – 43.9 28.0 – 50.2

Zn mg kg-1 1310 ± 41 1355 ± 6 1257 – 1339 1023 – 1490

Water sludge - WT-L (Low level concentrations)


Recommended