Analysis- an in depth examination of the results produced by a scientific procedure

• When the desk was chilled, we saw that the fish did not have any sort of reaction.

• When the desk was room temperature, we saw that the fish had a slightly greater reaction, because the head and tail moved slightly. However, the results were still minimal.

• When the desk was heated, we saw that the fish had a largely visible reaction when both the head and tail moved.

(Russoniello)

(Russoniello)

(Russoniello)

Conclusion- The end result that your experiment produces that proves or disproves your original hypothesis.

We can conclude from our data that when the desk increased in temperature, the fish had a greater reaction. Our experimental findings support our initial hypothesis which stated that the reaction of the fish would be greater as the temperature of the desk increased. However, there were other variables that may have effected the outcome. Because both the ice pack and the heat pack produced moisture, it’s possible that not all of the moisture was effectively removed. To further understand how the fish works, the next experiment we would conduct would be one to test how moisture levels effect the fish’s reaction.

Conclusion- Continued• In addition to our experiment, we placed our fortune fish

on a moist heat pack in order to see what the effects of a combination of heat and moisture would have on the fishes reaction.

• This extra trial produced the greatest reaction which showed us that both heat and moisture are variables that affect the fish’s movement.

(Russoniello)