+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Analysis and Design of mosque

Analysis and Design of mosque

Date post: 01-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: sabid-kanakkayil
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 56

Transcript
  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    1/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college1

    CHAPTER 1

    INTRODUCTION

    Reinforced concrete occupies a leading position modern construction along with prestressed concrete and steel construction. Proper construction depends upon through

    knowledge of action of structure and on the knowledge of characteristics and limitations of

    materials that are used in the construction. The care with work is executed in the site is also

    important in construction industry.

    Industrial training always helps to have practical exposure to the different methods of

    analysis and design in reinforced concrete. it helps to understand theory along with the use of

    structural engineering software. The entire spectrum of structural engineering field includes

    analysis, design, detailing , and drafting , also site related problems are under stood.

    The issue related to soil engineering and the study of soil investigation reports,

    interpretation of data and foundation design is also understood. Understanding different

    software tools in structural engineering, its limitations. The major project assigned during

    training was a multi storied mosque building at Malappuram. Site visits are also conducted

    during training.

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    2/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college2

    CHAPTER 2

    ABOUT THE PROJECT

    Industrial training was on modeling, analysis, designing and detailing of amultistoried mosque building. The proposed site is at Malappuram. Here basement floor,

    ground floor, first floor, second floor are intended for prayer. The height of building is about

    16.7m.

    The structural system consists of RCC conventional beam slab arrangement. Kerala is

    considered in seismic zone III as per IS 1893- 2002. Analysis was carried out using a very

    sophisticated software tool STAAD PRO v8i. Detailed analysis and design was carried out

    based on architectural drawing available and the results are summarized in the report.

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    3/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college3

    CHAPTER 3

    DESCRIPTION OF STAAD Pro

    3.1 GENERAL

    STAAD Pro is comprehensive structural engineering software that addresses allaspects of structural engineering – model development, analysis, design, verification andvisualization. This uses finite element method for analysis. One can building model, verify itgraphically, perform analysis and design, review the results, and create report all within thesame graphical base environment.

    3.2 THE MODELLING MODE

    There are two methods for building a model and assigning the structure data usingSTAAD Pro.

    a. Using the command file b. Using the graphical model generation mode or graphical user interface (GUI) as it is

    usually referred to.

    The command file is a text file, which contains the data for the structure being

    modeled. The file consists of simple English language like commands, using a format nativeto STAAD Pro. This command file may be created directly using the editor built into the

    program, or for that matter, any editor which saves data in text form, such as Notepad orWordPad available in Microsoft Windows.

    The graphical method or creation involves utilizing the Modeling mode of theSTAAD Pro graphical environment to draw the model using the graphical tools, andassigning data such as properties, material constants, loads, etc., using the various menusand dialog boxes of that mode.

    If the second method is adopted (using the UGI), the command file gets automaticallycreated behind the scenes

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    4/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college4

    Fig 3.1 THE PLAN OF THE STRUCTURE PRODUCED USING STAAD Pro

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    5/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college5

    Fig 3.2 ISOMETRIC VIEW OF THE STRUCTURE FROM STAAD Pro

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    6/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college6

    Fig 3.3 THE MODEL PROUCED USING STAAD Pro

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    7/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college7

    The graphical model generation mode and the command file are seamlesslyintegrated. So, at any time, the graphical model generation mode can be temporarily exitedand access the commend file. When changes are made to the command file and saved, theGUI immediately reflects the changes made to the structure through the command file. The

    frame of the building after modeling is shown in Fig.

    3.3 PERFORMING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

    STAAD offers two analysis engines – the STAAD engine for general purposeStructure Analysis and Design and the STARDYNE engine for advanced analysis options.The modeling mode of the STAAD environment is used to prepare the structural input data.After the input is prepared, the analysis engine can be chosen depending upon the nature ofthe analysis required. Depending on the type of analysis option selected, different types ofoutput files are generated during the analysis process.

    The STAAD analysis engine performs analysis and design simultaneously. But, tocarry out the design, the design parameters too must be specified along with geometry,

    properties, etc. before performing the analysis. The design code to be followed for design can be selected before performing the analysis/design.

    3.4 POST PROCESSING MODE

    The Post Processing Mode of STAAD offers facilitates for on – screen visualizationand verification of the analysis and design results. Displacements, forces, stresses, etc. can beviewed – both graphically and numerically in this mode. Most of the menu items in the post

    processing mode are the same as in the modeling mode. STAAD also enables preparation ofcomprehensive reports that include numerical and graphical result. Printable reports may begenerated in two ways. Through the STAAD output file and through the report setup facilityfrom the Post Processing Mode. The STAAD output file is a text file containing results,diagrams etc. It is a more versatile facility than the output file in terms of user – level control .

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    8/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college8

    CHAPTER 4

    GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF DESIGN

    4.1 OBJECTIVES OF STRUCTURAL DESIGN

    The design of the structure must satisfy the following requirements

    Stability : To prevent the overturning , sliding or buckling of the structures, or any

    part of it under action of loads.

    Strength : to resisit safely the stresses induced by the loads in the various structural

    members

    Serviceability : To ensure satisfactory performance under service load conditionswhich implies providing adequate stiffness and reinforcement to contain deflections,

    cracks widths and vibrations with in adequate limits and also providing

    impermeability and durability.

    There are other considerations that a sensible designer ought to bear in mind , viz..,

    Economy and aesthetics. One can always design a massive structure , which has more

    than adequate stability, strength and serviceability ,but the ensuing cost of the

    structure may be exorbitant and the end product far from aesthetics.

    4.2 SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT:

    The building site is located at Malappuram. The proposed site consists of top layer of

    very loose sand followed by soft to medium silty clay followed by Lateritic sandy clay with

    pebbles followed by silty clay/clayey sand followed by very dense sand. From the site

    observation, the soil condition of the site was medium soil of safe bearing capacity

    200 kN/m 2. Hence it is recommended foundation for this is isolated sloped footing

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    9/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college9

    CHAPTER 5

    STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS USING STAAD Pro

    5.1 GENERAL

    Analysis is done using STAAD Pro, as it is widely used for structural analysis anddesign from Design Engineers International. While doing analysis material and geometric

    properties are assumed. Loading considered in analysis are dead load, live load, seismic loadand wind load. Finally on running program output values are obtained, M15 grade and Fe415steel is used.

    5.2 LOADS CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN

    Structural analysis of the structure need to be preceded with the calculation of loadimposed on the structure. Various loads taken into account for the analysis of the structureinclude live load, dead load, wind load and seismic load. As the area falls under zone III ofthe earthquake classification as per Indian Standards, seismic design of the structure ismandatory. IS 875 Part I deals with dead loads, IS 875 Part II with imposed load, IS 875 PartIII with wind load and IS 1893 Part I with seismic load. The loading standard not onlyensures structure safety of building but also eliminate wastage caused by assuming

    unnecessary heavy loadings without proper assessment.

    5.2.1 DEAD LOAD

    Dead loads are loads that are constant in magnitude and fixed in position throughout a particular span. It includes self – weight of all structural components in that span. Dead loadshave been determined after assuming both material as well as geometric properties of allelements used in the building. Unit weight of RCC and brickwork are adopted as 25 KN/mand 20KN/m respectively.

    5.2.2 IMPOSED LOAD

    The load is assumed to be produced due to the intended use or occupancy of a building, load due to impact and vibration, and dust load, but excluding wind, seismic, andother loads due to temperature changes, creep, shrinkage, differential settlement etc.

    Imposed loads assumed for an assembly building shall be load that will be

    produced by the intended used or occupancy, but shall not be less than the equivalent

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    10/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college10

    minimum loads specified by table-1 IS 875 Part II. Live loads of all floors are assumed as4 kN/m 2.

    5.2.3 WIND LOAD

    Wind may be defined as air in motion relative to the surface of the earth. Buildingsshould always be designed with due attention for the effect of wind. In general, wind speed inthe atmospheric boundary layer increases with height from zero at the ground level tomaximum at a height called the gradient height. Slight change in the wind direction at thisheight is neglected in the code. Basic wind speeds (Vb) for different wind zone of India areobtained from IS 875 Part III (Appendix A). From this basic wind speed, the design windspeed (in m/sec) for each storey at height „z‟ is called from

    Vz = V b x k 1 x k 2 x k 3

    Where, k 1, k 2 ,k 3 = coefficients from IS 875 Part III,

    5.2.4 SEISMIC LOAD

    For the purpose of determining seismic forces, the country is classified in to fourseismic zones. Location of the structure falls under area of zone III. The seismic effect, i.e.,the intensity and duration of the vibrations, depend on the magnitude of the earthquake, depth

    of focus, distance from epicenter, soil strata which hold the structure etc.

    As per IS 1893 Part I, clause 6.1.2, the response of a structure to ground vibration is afunction of the nature of foundation soil, materials, from size and mode of construction ofstructures and duration and characteristics of ground motion. This standard specifies designforces for structures standing on rocks or soil which do not settle liquefy or slide due to lossof strength from ground vibration. Also the following assumptions are made for theearthquake resistant design of structures.

    Earthquake causes impulsive ground motions, which are complex and irregular in

    character, changing in period and amplitude each lasting for a small duration. Thereforeresonance of the type as visualized under steady state sinusoidal excitations will not occuras it would need time to build up such amplitudes.

    Earthquake is not likely to occur simultaneously with wind or maximum flood ormaximum sea waves.

    The value of elastic modulus of materials, wherever required, may be taken as for staticanalysis unless a more definite value is available for use in such condition.

    The seismic weight of each floor for the analysis is to be taken as its full dead load plus appropriate amount of imposed loads. While computing the seismic weight of each floor,

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    11/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college11

    the weight of columns and walls in any storey shall be equally distributed to the floors aboveand below. Percentage of imposed load as taken from table 8 of IS 1893 – 2002 is 50%.

    5.3 LOAD CALCULATIONS

    5.3.1 SEISMIC LOAD

    Design horizontal seismic coefficient, Ah = ZISa/2Rg(From IS1893 (Part I) – 2002 clause 6.4.2)Where,Z = Zone factor = 0.16 (from IS1893 (Part I) – 2002 clause 6.4.2 Table 2)I = Importance factor = 1.5 (from IS1893 (Part I) – 2002 clause 6.4.2 Table 6)R=response reduction factor (from IS1893 (Part I) – 2002 clause 6.4.2 Table 7)

    SS = Rock and soil silt factor = 2 (for medium soil)

    5.3.2 DEAD LOAD

    Floor load

    Dead load of slab = 0.12 x 25 = 3kN/m 2

    Finishes = 1kN/m 2

    Total = 4 kN/m 2

    Brick wall load4.2 m high = 0.23 x 4.2 x 20 = 19.32 kN/m

    5.3.3 LIVE LOAD

    Live load on floor = 4 kN/m 2

    Live load on Roof = 4 kN/m2

    5.3.4 WIND LOAD

    Basic wind speed in Trivandrum = v b = 39 m/s (from IS 875, Part III)

    Design wind speed = v z = v b x k 1 x k 2 x k 3

    k 1 = Probability factor

    k 2 = Terrain and size factor

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    12/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college12

    k 3 = Topography factor

    Design wind pressure P z = 0.6 x v z2

    TABLE 5.1 WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS

    FLOOR HEIGHT m

    Vb

    m/s K

    1 k

    2 k

    3

    VZ (m/s) P

    Z(kN/m

    2)

    GROUND

    FLOOR 3.9 39 1 1.05 1 40.95 1.00614515

    FIRST FLOOR 8.7 39 1 1.05 1 40.95 1.00614515

    SECOND FLOOR 12.9 39 1 1.0732 1 41.8548 1.05109457

    ROOF 17.1 39 1 1.1026 1 43.0014 1.10947224

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    13/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college13

    5.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS

    The various load combinations that are adopted in the analysis are shown intable

    TABLE 5.2 LOAD COMBINATIONS

    DL+LL 1.5 1.5

    DL+WLX

    1.5 1.5

    DL+WLZ 1.5 1.5

    DL+ELX

    1.5 1.5

    DL+ELZ 1.5 1.5

    DL+WLX

    0.9 1.5

    DL+WLZ 0.9 1.5

    DL+ELX

    0.9 1.5

    DL+ELZ 0.9 1.5

    DL+LL+WLX

    1.2 1.2 1.2

    DL+LL+WLZ 1.2 1.2 1.2

    DL+LL+ELX

    1.2 1.2 1.2

    DL+LL+ELZ 1.2 1.2 1.2

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    14/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college14

    Fig 5.1 WIND LOAD IN X DIRECTION.

    Fig 5.2 WIND LOAD IN Z DIRECTION

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    15/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college15

    Fig 5.3 SEISMIC LOAD in X-Direction

    Fig 5.4 SEISMIC LOAD in Z-Direction

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    16/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college16

    Fig 5.5 BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM OF GROUND FLOOR

    Fig 5.6 SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM OF GROUND FLOOR

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    17/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college17

    CHAPTER 6

    DESIGN OF RCC BUILDING

    6.1 DESIGN OF FOOTING

    6.1.1 GENERAL

    Footing is the type of foundation in which base of wall or column is sufficiently

    enlarged to act as an individual support widened base not only provides stability but is

    useful in distributing load on sufficient area of the soil. Foundation is the bottom most

    important component of a structure which generally lies below the ground level. The

    foundation provided for a RCC beam is called a column footing

    The column footing is distributing the load over a large area so that the

    intensity of pressure on soil, and not exceeded safe bearing capacity soil and settlement of

    structure is kept permissible limit.

    Types of footings:

    Isolated footing Combined footing

    Pile foundation Continuous footing for walls Spread footing Raft or Mat foundation Strap footing Cantilever footing

    6.1.2 DESIGN OF ISOLATED SLOPED FOOTING

    Design for:

    Soil pressure, q = 200 kN/m 2

    M20, ie., f ck = 20 N/mm 2

    Fe415, ie., f y = 415 N/mm2

    Size of column = 600mm x 300mm

    Design constants

    For M 20 – Fe 415 combination, we have:

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    18/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college18

    = 0.479 and R u = 2.761

    Size of footing

    W= 2150 kN

    Self weight of footing shall be assumed as 10% of the column load

    Total load, P = 2150+215 = 2365 kN

    Area of footing needed, A F = = = 11.825m2

    Provide a square footing of size 3.5 m x 3.5 m

    Net soil pressure acting upward, q 0 =

    = 175.5 kN/m 2

    Design of footing

    Maximum bending moment occurs at the face of column

    M = q 0 (B-b w)2 = 784 kNm

    Effective depth at the column face, d = = 972 mmLet the effective depth at the column face be„d‟ and that at the edge be 0.2d

    D = d + 0.2d = 1165

    Using an effective cover of 60mm

    Available depth of footing, d = 1165 – 60 = 1105 mm

    Effective depth of footing at the edge shall be 0.2d = 195 mm

    The overall thickness at the edge shall be 195+60 = 255 mm

    Check for shear

    (a) For one way shearV = q 0 B [ = 304 kNVu = 1.5V = 456 kN

    Effective depth d‟ at that location = 195 + ( ) ]= 476 mm

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    19/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college19

    Top width of section = 300 + = 2510 mmFor under reinforced section, adopt So that x u = 0.4d‟ = 190 mm

    Width b n at N.A = 2510 + = 2890 mmTherefore Ʈ v = V u/bnd‟ = 0.274 N/mm

    2

    Assume P= 0.3% for an under reinforced section Ʈ c = 0.384 N/mm 2

    (From IS 456 table 19)

    Ʈv < Ʈ c Hence safe

    (b) For two way shear

    Perimeter ABCD = 2 [(a+d)+(b+d)] = 2[600+1105+300+1105] = 6220mm

    Area of ABCD, A = (a+d)x(b+d) = (600+1105)x(300+1105) = 2.4 m 2

    Punching shear, V u = q o [B2-A] = 175.5 [3.5 2-2.4 2] = 1728.67 kN

    Ʈv = 1.5 = 1.5x1728.67x103/6220x1105 = 0.377 N/mm 2

    Ʈc = 0.25 = 1.118 N/mm 2Ʈv < Ʈ c Hence safe

    Steel reinforcement

    Ast = [ – ] b1d = 2296 mm 2 Hence provide 12 numbers of 16mm diameter rods uniformly spaced in the width3.5m in each direction

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    20/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college20

    6.2 DESIGN OF COLUMN

    6.2.1 GENERAL

    Column forms a very important component of structure. Column support beam which is in turn support walls and slabs. It should be realized that the failure of a column results in a collapse of the structure. The column is defined as the compression member, the effective length of which

    exceeds three times the least lateral dimension.

    Column may be cost to any of the following shape – square, circular, hexagonal,

    octagonal.

    As per IS 456:2000 a reinforced concrete column shall have longitudinal steel

    reinforcement shall not be less than 0.80 percentage more than 6 percentage of cross

    sectional area of the column required to transmit the all loading.

    Longitudinal reinforcement is provided to resist compressive load along with the

    concrete.

    The design of column therefore receive importance The object of stipulating minimum percentage of steel is to make provision to

    prevent buckling of the column due to any accidental essentially of load on it.

    The object of stipulating maximum percentage of steel is to provide reinforcement

    with such a limit to avoid congestion of reinforcement which would make it very

    difficult to place the concrete and consolidate it.

    6.2.2DESIGN OF RECTANGULAR COLUMN

    Material constants

    Use M 20 grade concrete and HYSD steel bars of grade Fe 415 .

    For M 20 Concrete, f ck = 20 N/mm2

    For Fe 415 Steel, f y = 415 N/mm2

    Preliminary dimensioning

    Depth of column, D = 600 mm

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    21/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college21

    Breadth of column, B = 300 mm

    Support condition is one end fixed and other hinged

    Unsupported length, = 4.3 m

    As per IS 456:2000, Table 28

    Multiplication factor for effective length =0.65

    Type of column

    Longitudinal reinforcement

    (0.8% is minimum steel area of column as per IS 456:2000)

    Assume of steel

    =

    = 0.1

    Uniaxi al moment capacity of section about xx-axis

    Assume,

    Diameter of bar = 20 mm

    Clear cover = 40 mm

    d‟ =clear cover +half the bar diameter

    = 40+10

    =50

    Taken = 0.1

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    22/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college22

    Results from STAAD

    Factored axial load , P u = 2262 kN

    Factored moment in x-direction, M ux = 61.74 kNm

    Factored moment in y-direction, M uxy = 5.89kNm

    = 0.628

    Assume , reinforcement is equally distributed on four sides

    Refer chart 48 of SP 16:1980,for =0.628, and ,weget

    =0.06

    = 129.6 kNm

    Uniaxial moment capacity of section about yy-axis

    b =600 mm

    D =300 mm

    = taken = 0.2

    Refer chart 50 of SP 16:1980, for

    =0.628, and

    , we get

    =0.06

    = 64.8 kNm

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    23/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college23

    Calculation of P uz

    Refer chart 63 of SP 16:1980, for p t = 2%, f ck = 20 N/mm 2 and ,

    Puz = = 2700 kN

    Refer chart 64 of SP 16:1980, for &

    we get, permissible value of =0.9 So the percentage of steel assumed is correct.

    = Provide 12 numbers of 20 mm ϕ bars distributed equally on four sides.

    Lateral ties

    According to IS 456:2000, clause 26.5.3.2(c)

    The diameter of lateral ties shall be not less than1. One fourth of the diameter of the largest longitudinal bar = 6 mmHence adopt of lateral ties as 6 mm

    Pitch

    According to IS 456:2000,clause 26.5.3.2(c)

    The pitch of transverse reinforcement shall be not more than the least of the following

    distances:

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    24/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college24

    i. The least lateral dimension =300 mm

    ii. Sixteen times the smallest diameter of the longitudinal reinforcement bar =16

    =320 mm

    ii. 300 mm

    Hence adopt pitch as 300 mm

    According to IS 13920:1993 clause 7.4.1

    Special confining reinforcement should be provided over a length l o from each joint

    face, towards mid span ,where l o shall not be less than

    i. Larger lateral dimension of column =600 mm

    ii. One-sixth of clear height of column = = 466.67 mmiii. 450 mm

    Hence adopt l o as 600 mm

    According to IS 13920:1993 clause 7.4.6 spacing of hoops used as special confining

    reinforcement:

    Hence adopt spacing of hoops =75 mm

    So provide 6 mm ϕ bars at 75 mm c/c up to a length of 600 mm from face of the joint

    towards mid span and 6 mm ϕ bars at 300 mm c/c at all other places.

    Special confining reinforcement for column and joint details (according to IS

    13920:1993)

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    25/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college25

    6.3 DESIGN OF BEAMS

    6.3.1 GENERAL

    A beam is structural element that is capable of withstanding load primarily

    by resisting bending. The bending force induced in to the material of beam as result of

    the external loads, own weight, span and external reactions to these loads is called a

    bending moment.

    Beams generally carry vertical gravitational forces but can also be used to

    carry horizontal loads (ie., loads due to an earthquake or wind). The loads carried by

    beam are transferred to columns, walls or girders, which then transfer the force to

    adjacent structural compression members. In a light frame construction the joists the joists rests on the beam.

    Beams are characterized by their profile (the shape of the cross section),

    their length and their material. In contemporary construction, beams are typically made

    of steel, reinforced concrete, or wood. The common type is I-beam or wide flange

    beam. This is commonly used in steel – frame buildings and bridges. Other common

    beams profiles are C-channel the hollow structural section beam, the pipe and the

    angle.

    6.3.1 DESIGN OF DOUBLY REINFORCED BEAM

    Fig6.1: Bending moment diagram

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    26/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college26

    Fig.6.2 : Shear force diagram

    Material constants

    Use M 15 grade concrete and HYSD steel bars of grade Fe 415 .

    For M 15 Concrete, f ck = 15 N/mm2

    For Fe 415 Steel, f y = 415 N/mm 2

    Preliminary dimensioning

    Width of the beam =230 mm

    Depth of the beam =600 mm

    Assume 25 mm clear cover and 20 mm ϕ bars

    Effective depth =600-25-10 = 565 mm

    Ultimate moments and shear force (Left end)

    Ultimate bending moment, M u = 177.18kNmUltimate shear force, V u =134.9 kN

    Limiting moment of resistance

    ( ) = 0.138 = 0.138 = 151.98 kNm

    Mu () , Hence design as doubly reinforced section

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    27/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college27

    2.413

    p t(from SP16:1980)

    0.818

    Pc(from SP16:1980)

    0.106

    (required), mm 2

    1062.99

    ( provided), mm 2

    1256

    (#4,20 ɸ)

    (required), mm 2 137.75

    ( provided), mm 2

    226.08

    (#2,12 ɸ)

    Ultimate moments and shear force (Mid span)

    Ultimate bending moment, M u = 101.53 kNm

    Ultimate shear force, V u =14.021kN

    Limiting moment of resistance

    ( ) = 0.138 = 0.138 = 151.98 kNm

    Mu () , Hence design as single reinforced section

    1.33

    p t(from SP16:1980)

    0.417

    (required), mm 2

    542

    ( provided), mm2

    628

    (#2,20 ɸ)

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    28/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college28

    Ultimate moments and shear force (Right end)

    Ultimate bending moment, M u = 96.91 kNm

    Ultimate shear force, V u =109.171kN

    Limiting moment of resistance

    ( ) = 0.138 = 0.138 = 151.98 kNm

    Mu () , Hence design as single reinforced section 1.32

    p t(from SP16:1980)

    0.413

    (required), mm 2

    536.7

    ( provided), mm 2

    628

    (#2,20 ɸ)

    Table 6.1: Reinforcement details of beam

    Details Left end Mid span Right end

    Moment

    KNm

    177.18 101.53 96.91

    Shear

    KN

    134.9 14.021 109.17

    2.413 1.33 1.32

    p t(from SP16:1980)

    0.818 0.72 0.72

    Pc(from SP16:1980)

    0.106 0.003 0.003

    (required), mm2

    1062.99 935.64 935.64

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    29/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college29

    ( provided), mm 2

    1256

    (#4,20 ɸ,)

    942

    (#3,20)

    942

    (#3,20)

    (required), mm 2 137.75 - -

    ( provided), mm 2

    226.08

    (#2,12 ɸ)

    226.08

    (#2,12 ɸ)

    226.08

    (#2,12 ɸ)

    Check for shear stress

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 40.1

    =

    = 1.038 N/mm 2

    ( ) = = 0.966

    As per IS 456:2000 ,table 19

    Permissible stress , =0.59 N/mm 2

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 40.4,

    Strength of shear reinforcement, V us = V u (τc b d)

    = (134,9 ) – (0.59 )

    =58.23 KN

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    30/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college30

    = 1.03 kN/cm

    As per SP 16:1980, table 62

    Provided = 1.037 kN/cm

    Use 8mm ϕ 2 legged stirrups @ 250 mm c/c

    According to IS 456:2000, clause 26.5.1.5,

    The spacing of stirrups in beams should not exceed the least of

    a) 0.75d =0.75 =423.75 mm

    b) 300 mm

    Maximum spacing of shear reinforcement = 300 mm

    Therefore provide 8 mm Φ 2 legged stirrups @ 250 mm c/c up to a distance of 0.25 L ef fromthe face of the support and provide 8 mm Φ 2 legged stirrups @ 300 mm c/c in all other

    places.

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    31/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college31

    6.4 DESIGN OF STAIRCASE

    6.4.1 GENERAL

    Staircase in a building, facilitate easy vertical movement of person from one

    floor to another.

    Stairway, staircase, stairwell, flight of stairs or simply stairs are names for

    construction design to bridge a large vertical distance by dividing in to smaller vertical

    distance called steps. Stairways may be straight around or may consist of two or more

    straight piece connected at angles.

    Special stairways include escalators and ladders. Alternative to stairways are

    elevators, stair lifts and inclined moving sidewalks as well as sanitary inclined sidewalks.

    TYPES OF STAIRCASE

    Dog legged staircase Open well staircase

    Spiral staircase Quarter turn staircase

    6.4.2 DESIGN OF DOGLEGGED STAIRCASE

    Material Constants:-

    Concrete, f ck = 15 N/mm 2

    Steel, f y

    = 415 N/mm 2

    Span, tread & rise of the stair are taken from the architectural drawings provided.

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 33.1

    Effective span l eff = 5465 mm

    Thickness of slab =

    = 200 mm

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    32/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college32

    Provide 10 mm diameter bars

    Clear cover = 25 mm

    Effective depth, d = 170 mm

    Rise of stair = 170 mm

    Tread of stair = 300 mm

    Thickness of the waist slab = 200 mm

    Load calculation

    Dead load of waist slab = √ √ The self-weight of the steps is calculated by treating the step to be equivalent horizontal

    slab of thickness equal to half the rise

    Self-weight of step =0.5

    =0.5

    Floor finish = 1 As per IS: 875(Part 2)-1987 Table-1

    Live load = 4 Total service load = 12.875 Consider 1 m width of waist slab

    Total service load / m run =12.875

    = 12.875

    Total ultimate load = w u =

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    33/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college33

    Ultimate design moment

    Maximum B.M at the center of span is given by;

    Mu = =

    = 71.85 kNm

    Check for depth of waist slab

    = =

    =186 mm

    Hence the effective depth selected is sufficient to resist the ultimate moment.

    Reinforcements

    From sp16, table 22

    ( )=1256 mm 2

    Check for spacing

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 26.3.3(b)

    Maximum spacing = { }

    = { }

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    34/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college34

    = 300 mm

    Check for area of steel

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 26.5.2.1

    ( ) =

    = 240 mm 2

    ( ) ()

    Distribution Steel

    Distribution reinforcement = 0.12 of cross – sectional area

    = 240 mm 2

    Use 8 mm bars

    = = 210 mm

    Provide 8 mm bars at 200 mm c/c.

    Check

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 26.3.3(b)

    Maximum spacing = { } = {

    }

    = 450 mm

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    35/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college35

    Check for shear

    =

    = 52.68 kN

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 40.1

    τ =

    = 0.301 N/mm 2

    = τ

    As per IS 456:2000, Table 20

    Maximum shear stress, (τ ) τ τ (τ )

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    36/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college36

    6.5 SLAB DESIGN

    6.5.1 GENERAL

    Reinforced concrete slabs consists the most common type of structuralelements used to cover roofs and floors of buildings. One way slabs are supported on

    opposite sides and the loads are transmitted in one direction. The reinforced concrete

    slab supported on all the four edges with the two way slabs ratio of long to short span

    not exceeding 2 are referred to as two way slabs. Slabs projecting from supports or

    beams are termed as cantilever slabs. Reinforced concrete slabs supported only on

    columns without beams are called as flat slabs sloping slabs are adopted in the case of

    shell roof etc. In general the main reinforcement in slabs is provided in the principle

    bending direction of the slab.

    Most of slab used in building have an overall thickness in the range of 100

    mm to 200 mm while thicker slabs in the range of 200 mm to 500 mm is required in the

    case of bridge decks to resist heavy loads of vehicles the slabs are designed as beams of

    unit width for a given type of loading and support conditions. The percentage of

    reinforcement in slab is generally low in the range of 0.30 to 0.50 percent.

    TYPES OF SLAB

    Slabs are classified according to the system of support used as under.

    Two way spanning slab Circular and other shapes Cantilever slabs Flat slab supported directly on column without beams.

    6.5.2 DESIGN OF TWO WAY SLAB

    Material constants

    Use M 20 grade concrete and HYSD steel bars of grade Fe 415 .

    For M20 Concrete, f ck = 15 N/mm2

    For Fe 415 Steel, fy = 415 N/mm 2

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    37/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college37

    Type of slab

    Centre to Centre distance of longer span, = 6 m

    Centre to Centre distance of shorter span, = 4 m

    Two way slab

    Type of slab: two adjacent edges discontinuous

    Preliminary dimensioning

    As per IS456:2000, clause 24.1,

    Thickness of slab =

    =

    =114 mm

    Provide a 120 mm thick slab.

    Assume 20 mm clear cover and 10 mm ϕ bars

    Effective depth along shorter direction, d x = 95mm

    Effective depth along longer direction, d y = 85mm

    Effective span

    As per IS 456:2000, clause 22(a)

    Effective span along short and long spans are computed as:

    =clear span +effective depth =4 +.095 = 4.095 m

    =clear span +effective depth =6 +.085 = 6.085 m

    Load calculation

    Dead load of waist slab = Floor finish = 1 As per IS: 875(Part 2)-1987 Table-1

    Live load = 4

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    38/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college38

    Total service load = 8

    Design ultimate load, =1.5 8 = 12 Ultimate design moment

    Refer table 26 of IS 456:2000 and read out the moment coefficients for

    Short span moment coefficients:

    a) – ve moment coefficient = =0.075 b) + ve moment coefficient = =0.056

    Long span moment coefficients:

    a) – ve moment coefficient = =0.047 b) + ve moment coefficient = =0.035( ) = = = 15.092 kNm( ) = = 11.268 kNm( ) = = 9.45 kNm

    ( ) = = 7.043 kNmCheck for depth( ) = 0.138

    = ( ) =

    =85.38mm

    (95 mm)

    Hence the effective depth selected is sufficient to resist the design ultimate moment.

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    39/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college39

    d) Reinforcements along short and long span directions

    The area of reinforcement is calculated Referring sp16, table 17, for slab thickness

    120mm with 8mm and 10mm ɸ bars

    Table 6.2 reinforcement details in two way slab

    Table 6.1: Reinforcement details of slab

    Check for spacing

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 26.3.3(b)

    Maximum spacing = { } = { } = 285 mm

    Check for area of steel

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 26.5.2.1

    ( )

    Location (required) (provided)

    1)short span

    Edge section

    Mid span section

    10mm ɸ@ 160mm c/c

    10mm ɸ@ 220mm c/c

    10mm ɸ@ 150mm c/c

    10mm ɸ@ 210mm c/c

    2)long span

    Edge sectionMid span section

    8mm ɸ@ 170mm c/c

    8mm ɸ@ 240mm c/c 8mmɸ@ 160mm c/c

    8mmɸ@ 230mm c/c

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    40/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college40

    =

    = 144 mm 2

    ( ) = 373 mm 2( ) ()

    Check for deflection:

    ( ) = 373 mm²( ) = 356 mm²

    f s = ( )( ) =

    = 208.06

    P t = = 0.39

    As per IS 456:2000, fig 4, page 38

    Modification factor = 1.7

    As per IS 456:2000, clause 23.2.1

    = 26

    =26

    = = 43

    So deflection is safe with provided depth.

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    41/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college41

    Check for shear

    =

    = 24.57 kN

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 40.1

    τ = = 0.388 N/mm 2

    = τ = 0.41 N/mm 2

    As per IS 456:2000 clause 40.2

    Design shear strength of concrete = τ = 1.3 = 0.53 N/mm 2

    As per IS 456:2000, Table 20

    Maximum shear stress, (τ ) τ τ (τ )

    Check for cracking

    As per IS 456:2000, clause 43.1:

    1. Steel provided is more than 0.12 percent

    2. Spacing of main steel 3. Diameter of reinforcement

    Hence cracks will be within the permissible limits

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    42/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college42

    6.6 DESIGN OF RCC DOME

    6.6.1 GENERAL

    Concrete domes are generally preferred to cover circular tanks and for roofsof large span structures which are circular in shape such as sports area, mosques , and

    churches where un interrupted floor space is desirable. The spherical domes supported by

    ring beam at the base.

    The thickness of reinforced concrete spherical dome is generally not less

    than of the diameter with the values of 50 mm-100 mm for domes in the range of

    25m-50m respectively. The reinforcement in the dome is made up of wire mesh and

    concrete is placed in concentric rings over preformed framework or the dome can be

    formed by gunniting using micro concrete.

    6.6.2 DESIGN OF RCC DOME -central portion above the 2 ND floor of Mosque

    Data:

    Span of dome, D = 4.23 m

    Thickness of dome, t = 120 mm

    Central rise, r = 2 m

    M15, ie., f ck = 15 N/mm 2

    Fe415, ie., f y = 415 N/mm2

    Compressive strength of steel = 100 N/mm 2

    Load calculation:

    The self-weight of the slab = (0.12*1*1)25 = 3.00 kN/m 2

    Floor finishes = 1 kN/m 2

    The total load, = 4 kN/m 2

    Factored load W= 6 kN/m 2

    Determination of stresses:

    1) Meridianal thrust, M T =

    MT = ( ) ( ) (R= = = 2.118 m)

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    43/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college43

    MT = 8.85 kN/m (sin = , = 64.15 )

    Meridianal stress,

    MS =

    =

    ( ) = 0.07375 N/mm 2

    MS = 0.07375 N/mm 2 cc = 4 N/mm 2 (IS 456 : 2000 p.no:81 ) Hence, it is safe

    2) Hoop thrust, H T = WR(cos )

    HT = 6*2.118*(cos64.15 )

    HT = -3.308 kN/m

    Hoop stress,

    HS = = ( ) = -0.027 N/mm2

    HS = -0.003 N/mm 2 cc = 4 N/mm 2 Hence, it is safe

    But these stresses are very low. Therefore minimum of 0.30% of the dome area will be

    adopted as the reinforcement.

    ie., minimum reinforcement, A st = 0.30%(bD)

    Ast = *(1000*120)

    Ast = 360 mm2

    Spacing, s = ( )*1000 = ( )*1000 (assume, diameter = 12

    mm)

    s = 314.16 mm ≈ 300mm c/c

    Provide main reinforcement of 12 mm diameter @ 300 mm c/c spacing.

    Therefore, actual area, A st = = 377 mm 2

    Design of ring beam:

    Hoop tension,

    Ft = = ( ) Ft = 20.14 kN

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    44/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college44

    The reinforcement required,

    Ast = Ast =

    mm 2

    Number of bars, n = = = 1.78 4 numbers (assume 12 mm diameter

    bars)

    Provide 4 numbers of 12 mm diameter rods as ring beam reinforcement.

    Therefore, actual area, A st = 4*113.10 = 452.40 mm 2

    Determination of the size of ring beam:

    The c/s area of the ring beam, ( ) = 1.20

    ( ) = 1.20 (m = = 13.33)

    Ac = 11205.36 mm2 (assume square

    beam)

    So, the size of ring beam is given as 150 mm*150 mm.

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    45/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college45

    6.7 DESIGN OF WATER TANK

    6.7.1 GENERAL

    The large container in which the water is made to occupy is popularly known as

    water tank. The main factors want to consider while constructing a water tank is its resistance

    against crack, corrosion, permeability. Water tightness is also an important criterion in water

    tanks. Usually richer mixes with M20, M30 concrete are used. The tensile stresses permitted

    in concrete are restricted to control cracking. In concrete as per IS: 3370, part II, 1965.

    TYPES OF WATER TANK

    Water tank resting on the ground Underground tanks Elevated water tanks on staging

    6.7.2 DESIGN OF UNDERGROUND WATER TANK (rectangular)

    Data:

    Length = 3.60m

    Breadth = 1.60m

    Depth, H = 0.70m

    Weight of soil, w = 20 kN/m 3

    M20, ie., f ck = 20 N/mm2

    Fe415, ie., f y = 415 N/mm 2

    Check for design:

    2.25 > 2.00

    The long walls are designed as vertical cantilevers and the short walls are designed as thehorizontal slabs spanning between long walls.

    Design of long walls:

    Vertical reinforcement:

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    46/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college46

    The coefficient of earth pressure, k a = (assume wet soil, = 6 )

    k a = = 0.81

    When tank is full:

    The maximum pressure developed by wet soil,

    Ps = kawH

    Ps = 0.81*20*0.70

    Ps = 11.34 kN/m2

    The maximum water pressure developed,

    Pw = W w*HPw = 10*0.70 = 7.00 kN/m

    2 Therefore, the net pressure,

    Pn = 11.34 – 7.00 = 4.34 kN/m 2 The maximum bending moment near the water surface,

    = = 0.06 kNm

    And the maximum bending moment away from the water surface

    = = 0.14 kNmWhen the tank is empty:

    There is no water pressure, hence P w = 0 kN/m2

    Therefore, the net pressure,Pn = 11.34 – 0.00 = 11.34 kN/m 2

    The maximum bending moment near the water surface,

    = = 0.16 kNm

    And the maximum bending moment away from the water surface

    = = 0.37 kNmThe depth of the slab,

    M = 0.28*bD 2 0.37*10 6 = 0.28*1000*D 2 D = 36.35 mm 60 m

    d = 60 – (15) – ( ) (assume 10 mm diameter) d = 40 mm

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    47/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college47

    for away,

    Ast = = = 93.53 mm2

    Spacing, s = ( )*1000 = ( )1000 = 840 mm (assume 10 mm diameter)

    Maximum spacing, s 1 = 3d = 5*60 = 180 mm

    s2 = 300 mm

    Provide 10 mm diameter bars @ 180 mm c/c spacing (for 2 faces)

    Therefore, actual area, A st = = 436.33 mm2

    for near,

    Ast = = = 40.44 mm 2

    Spacing, s = ( )*1000 = ( )1000 = 1243 mm (assume 8 mm diameter)

    Maximum spacing, s 1 = 3d = 3*60 = 180 mm

    s2 = 300 mm

    Provide 8 mm diameter bars @ 180 mm c/c spacing (for 2 faces).

    Therefore, actual area, A st = = 280 mm2

    Horizontal reinforcement:

    The horizontal reinforcement area, A st = 0.30%(bD)

    Ast = *(1000*60)

    Ast = 180 mm2/2 = 90 mm 2

    Spacing, s = ( )*1000 = ( )1000 = 558.55 mm (assume 8 mm

    diameter)

    Maximum spacing, s 1 = 3d = 3*60 = 180 mm

    s2 = 300 mm

    Provide 8 mm diameter bars @ 180 mm c/c spacing (for 2 faces).

    Therefore, actual area, A st = = 280 mm 2

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    48/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college48

    Design of short walls:

    Horizontal reinforcement:

    The maximum pressure developed by wet soil = 11.34 kN/m 2

    The bending moment @ corners for short walls,

    M = = = 0.46 kNm

    Therefore, the area of reinforcement,

    Ast = = = 116.28 mm2

    Spacing, s = ( )*1000 = ( )1000 = 675 mm (assume 10 mm diameter)

    Maximum spacing, s 1 = 3d = 3*60 = 180 mms2 = 300 mm

    Provide 10 mm diameter bars @ 180 mm c/c spacing (for 2 faces).

    Therefore, actual area, A st = = 436.33 mm2

    Vertical reinforcement:

    The horizontal reinforcement area, A st = 0.30%(bD)

    Ast = *(1000*60)

    Ast = 180 mm2

    Spacing, s = ( )*1000 = ( )1000 = 280 mm (assume 8 mm diameter)

    Maximum spacing, s 1 = 3d = 3*60 = 180 mm

    s2 = 450 mm

    Provide 8 mm diameter bars @ 180 mm c/c spacing (for 2 faces).

    Therefore, actual area, A st = = 280 mm 2

    Design of slab:

    Assume, the overall depth of slab, D = 100 mm

    Therefore, the effective depth, d = 100 – (15) – ( ) (assume 12 mm diameter)

    d = 80 mm

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    49/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college49

    The dead load of the slab = (0.08*1*1)25 = 2.00 kN/m 2

    Assume, live load = 1.50 kN/m 2 Assume, floor finish = 0.60 kN/m 2 Therefore, total load W = 4.10 kN/m 2

    The maximum bending moment, M = = = 2.48 kNm

    Check for depth,

    M = Qbd 2

    2.48*10 6 = 1.21*1000*d 2

    d = 45.27 mm < 80 mm hence, it is safe

    Area of main reinforcement:

    Ast = = = 313.45 mm2

    Spacing, s = ( )*1000 = ( )1000 = 360.82 mm (assumed diameter is 12 mm)

    Maximum spacing, s 1 = 3d = 3*80 = 240 mm

    s2 = 300 mm

    Provide 12 mm diameter bars @ 240 mm c/c spacing.

    Therefore, actual area, A st = = 471.25 mm2

    Area of distribution reinforcement:

    The distribution reinforcement area, A st = 0.30%(bD)

    Ast = *(1000*100)

    Ast = 300 mm2

    Spacing, s = ( )*1000 = ( )1000 = 168 mm (assume 8 mm diameter)

    Maximum spacing, s 1 = 3d = 3*80 = 240 mm

    s2 = 300 mm

    Provide 8 mm diameter bars @ 165 mm c/c spacing (for 2 faces).

    Therefore, actual area, A st = = 304.67 mm2

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    50/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college50

    CHAPTER 7

    SITE VISITS

    17.1. SITE VISIT TO APOLLO BUILDERS MANJERI

    As part of this training, a site visit was conducted to the construction site of apollo builders,

    Manjeri. It is R.C.C framed structure having two towers. The tower 1 has G+15 floors and the

    tower 2 has G+ 14 floors. The construction techniques adopted for boring and concreting of

    Direct Mud Circulation (D.M.C) pile were observed. The hard rock available at the site was

    at a depth of 10m.

    The diameters of the piles are 600, 700 and 800 mm. The piles are driven up to a depth of 10

    m were hard strata was available. The process of pile driving and concreting of piles were

    clearly observed and understood.

    D.M.C pile is Direct Mud Circulation pile where water jet is let through the piling chisel

    which comes out from bottom with mud. In D.M.C pile foundation the bentonite suspension

    is pumped into the bottom of the hole through the drill rods and it overflows at the top of the

    casing. The mud pump should have the capacity to maintain a velocity of 0.41 to 0.76m/s to

    float the cuttings.

    Fig 7.1. D.M.C piling

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    51/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college51

    Fig 7.2. Reinforcement in retaining wall

    Fig 7.3. Reinforcement in column

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    52/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college52

    7.2. SITE VISIT TO APOLLO BUILDERS, CALICUT.

    The second site visit was to the construction site of apollo builders, Calicut. It has got

    both the villa and the apartment. The apartment has 2 basement floor and the ground floor for

    car parking and 6 floors.

    Fig.7.4. Reinforcement in beam

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    53/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college53

    Fig 7.5. Sunken slab

    In villas, foundation and reinforcement of roof slab construction was completed. For two way

    slabs, the spacing for top and bottom reinforcement is different while for one way slab, the

    top and bottom spacing are same. Framed section of beam columns were completed for villas.

    Fig.7.6 Concealed beam

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    54/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college54

    CHAPTER 8

    CONCLUSION

    The industrial training, taken through a period of three months allowed me to gain

    ample exposure to various field practices in the analysis and design of multi- storied

    buildings and also in various construction techniques used in the industry. The analysis was

    done using the software package STAAD Pro v8i and the drawing details in Auto CAD 2010.

    All the structural components were designed manually. The use of the software offers saving

    in time, It takes value on safer side than manual work. Hence manual design was adopted.

    The analysis and design was done according to standard specifications to the possible extend.

    The various difficulties encountered in the design process and the various constraints faced

    by the structural engineer in designing up to the architectural drawing were also well

    understood. This training helped to understand and analyse the structural problem faced by

    the construction industry. Site visits also gave me an exposure to the industry.

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    55/56

    Anal ysis and Design of mosque I ndustrial Tr ainin g report 2013

    Department of Civil Engin eeri ng KM EA Engi neeri ng college55

    REFERENCES

    1. S.Unnikrishna Pillai & Devadas Menon “Reinforced Concrete Design”. Tata

    McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, 2003.

    2. N Krishna Raju, “Advanced Reinforced Concrete Design”, C.B.S Publishers and

    Distributers, New Delhi,2004

    3. P.C. Varghese, “Advanced Reinforced Concrete Design” , Prentice-Hall of India

    Private Limited, New Delhi, 2008.

    4. Pankaj Agarwal & Manish Shrikhande “Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”,

    Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, 2007.

    5. IS: 456- 2000, “ Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete-Code of Practice ” ,

    Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    6. IS: 875 (Part I)- 1987, “ Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Loads

    (Other than earthquake) for Building and Structures” , Bureau of Indian Standards,

    New Delhi.

    7. IS: 875 (Part II)- 1987, “ Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Loads

    (Other than earthquake) for Building and Structures” , Bureau of Indian Standards,

    New Delhi.

    8. IS: 875 (Part III)- 1987, “ Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Loads

    (Other than earthquake) for Building and Structures” , Bureau of Indian Standards,

    New Delhi

    9. IS: 1893 (Part I)-2002, “ Indian Standard Criteria for earthquake Resistant Design of

    Structures”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    10. IS: 3370 (Part II)- 1965, “ Indian Standard Code of Practice for Concrete Structures for

    the Storage of Liquids”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

  • 8/9/2019 Analysis and Design of mosque

    56/56


Recommended