Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
1
Research Article
ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN OF SLUMP DRY
CONCRETE MIX IN WARM AND HOT HUMID ZONES, SOUTH
EASTERN NIGERIA
John U. Ezeokonkwo1, Chukwuemeka Daniel Ezeliora
2, F. O. Ezeokoli
1
1Department of Building, NnamdiAzikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, NnamdiAzikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State
Correspondence should be addressed to John U. Ezeokonkwo
Received August 14, 2015; Accepted August 22, 2015; Published September 05, 2015;
Copyright: © 2015 John U. Ezeokonkwo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
Cite This Article: U. Ezeokonkwo, J., Daniel Ezeliora, C., Ezeokoli, F.(2015). Analysis and Experimental Design of Slump Dry Concrete Mix in Warm and Hot Humid Zones, South Eastern Nigeria. Advances in Engineering &
Scientific Research, 1(1).1-12
ABSTRACT
In the research work, the use of factorial mathematical model was adopted for the slumps dry of concrete mix in a Hot and
Warm humid zones as functions of quantity of cement, water-cement ratio and quantity of aggregates, the composition of
the concrete mix was optimized by varying the independent factors (variables) for various seasons within the zones through
Box Wilson’s composite mathematical method. The optimum value for factors X1 and X2 and X3 and X4 were obtained for
the Hot and Warm humid zones as Y2 = 106.8221. The electronic (computer) manipulations of the data generated from the
experiments, the following graphs (1 – 8) were generated for a better understanding of interactions between the factors and
value generated as a result.
KEYWORDS:Concrete mix, matlab, Climatic Conditions, factorial design, Quality, Production
INTRODUCTION
Conceptual framework is the operationalization of the
variables that hold the research together. It helps one to
make logical sense of the relationship among variables or
factors that have been identified as significant to the
problem under investigation. The quality control
management of building materials with emphases on
concrete works is examined based on the following:
Concept of Quality Control in Building
Production,
Factors affecting Quality of Concrete Work.
Climatic conditions and their effect on Quality of
Concrete Work
Concrete Mix Design and Production
Quality Control Measures of Concrete Works
Concept Of Quality Control In Building Production
Quality Control is a process employed in other to ensure
that a product or service conforms to established standards
or specifications. It may include whatever actions a
business deems necessary to provide for control and
verification of certain characteristics of a product or
service. The basic goal of quality control is to ensure that
the products, services, or processes provided meet specific
requirements and are dependable, satisfactory and fiscally
sound.
Essentially, quality control involves the examination of a
product, services, or process for certain minimum levels of
quality. The goal of a quality control team is to identify
products or services that do not meet a specified standard
of quality. If a problem is identified, the job of a quality
www.advancejournals.org
Open Access Scientific Publisher
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
2
k k k
control team or professional may involve stopping
production temporarily. Depending on the particular
service or product as well as the type of problem identified,
production or implantation may not cease entirely.
Wisegeek, (2010).
The concept of quality control in building production is the
quality of the production which involves the quality of
integrated action due to human, material, machinery,
process methodology and work environment. This is also
known as process quality which reflects the quality of the
finished work or product. In order to ensure the quality of
production, the quality of each process must be controlled,
which is the focus of quality control during construction
Shilian, (2004).
HUMAN FACTORS IN QUALITY CONTROL
Since human activities, form part of production process,
the overall quality control and individual ability of humans
would determine to large extent the results of all quality
control activities. Therefore, human are considered as both
the controlled targets and controlling motivation of other
quality control activities Cheng, (2004). The contents of
human control includes the overall quality of the set up or
company and individual knowledge, ability, physical
condition, psychological state, quality consciousness,
behaviour, concept of organizational discipline, and
professional ethics. The main measures and approach of
human control on production sites are summarized as
follows:
The management objectives and
responsibilities of the project manager or
supervisor being considered as the centre the
organization of project management should be
set up reasonably with appropriate
management personnel.
The operating workers should be asked to
have relevant qualifications, particularly
important technical trades, special trades etc.
There should be very strict on-site
management system and production
discipline and the standard of operation
technology and management activities.
Incentives and communication activities should be
promoted to arouse staff’s enthusiasm.
REGRESSION MODEL
In accordance with the experimental method (Box
Wilson’s Mathematical Theory of Experiment), 25
experiments were carried out for effective study of the
mutual interactions of various factors (variables)
considered in the experiment. Both the experimental and
theoretical values of the slump in mm, density and
compressive strength of the concrete measured during the
wet and dry seasons obtained as contained in tables 1 and 2
for the two zones (Hot and Warm humid zones). From the
results obtained regressional model for the factors –
dependent variables were derived in the form.
Y =bo + ΣbiXi+ΣbijXi
2
+Σbij XiXj 1
i=1 i=1 i-j
The main objective in the regression analysis is to determine the statistical relevance of the derived mathematical
expression for the studied subject of this research, which in summary is as a check and balance apparatus for the reliability
of measured results of the experiment on one hand, and the adequacy of the derived Mathematical Model (MM) for the
observations made.
Critical Values of Regression Coefficient based on the Regression Mathematical Model is shown in the equation 1.1.
Y2=208–0.035X1–9.12X2+0.0268X3–0.0501X4 ..... Equation 1.1
The equation 1.1 is the regression equation of the slump dry season under which the experiments were performed.
THE RESEARCH METHOD
used in this work is the application of Factorial design Analysis of Mathematical Models for Variables in the Zones. The
method is used to study the relative influence of each of the factors on the slumps (workability) of concrete, density and
compressive strength for each climatic season, quasi or mono factorial models were obtained. From the analysis, it is
possible to make the following deductions on the influence of the different factors over the workability density and strength
of concrete.
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
3
Computer Analysis Of The Experimental Results From The Two Zones
Table 1:Values of Results from Hot Humid Zone (Awka)
Level of factors and test X1 = C Cement kg/m3
X2= w water content kg/m
3
X3 = Fa fine paragraph kg/m3
X4 = Ca coarse Aggregate kg/m0
Slump dry mm
Xnar Highest level (+)
Xim Lowest level (-)
Xer Central Level (0) average
𝜹Interval of Change Δ
300
207
254
46
7
5
6
1
690
414
552
138
1380
953
1167
213
Test No X1 X2 X3 X4 Y2
1 207 5 414 953 85
2 207 7 690 953 103
3 207 5 690 953 157
4 207 5 690 953 150
5 300 7 414 953 63
6 300 5 690 1380 80
7 207 7 690 1380 97
8 207 7 690 1380 51
9 207 6 552 1167 64
10 300 7 552 1167 58
11 254 5 552 1167 78
12 254 7 552 1167 94
13 254 6 414 953 159
14 300 5 690 953 152
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
4
15 207 7 414 1380 112
16 254 6 552 1167 170
17 207 5 414 953 100
18 207 5 690 953 98
19 254 7 552 1167 92
20 254 5 552 1167 92
21 254 7 690 953 99
22 254 6 414 1167 99
23 254 6 552 1380 101
24 254 6 552 953 97
25 254 6 552 1167 142
Source: Researcher’s Field Work
Table 2:Values of Result obtained from Experiment in Warm Humid Zone (Owerri)
Level (of Factors and tests)
X1 = C Cement Kg.m3
X2 = c
Water Cement Kg/m3
X3 =
Fine Aggregate
Kg/m3
X4
Coarse
Aggregate
Slump
SDRY
Highest Level (+) 300 .7 690 1380
Xmin Lowel level (-) 207 .5 414 953
Xmin Control level(0) 254 .6 552 1167
Interval of Change 46 .1 138 213 Y2
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
5
Source: Researcher’s Field Work
After experimentally generating data on Tables 1 and 2, the data was subjected to electronic manipulation with Minitab
software and the following results with appropriates tables and figures were obtained.
S/N0
1 - - - - 85
2 + + - - 110
3 - + - - 159
4 - + - - 157
5 + + - - 125
6 + - + + 73
7 - + + + 101
8 + + + + 163
9 - 0 0 0 72
10 + 0 0 0 58
11 0 - 0 0 87
12 0 + 0 0 68
13 0 0 - - 159
14 + - + - 157
15 - + - + 109
16 0 0 0 0 167
17 - - - 0 105
18 - + - 0 97
19 0 + 0 0 91
20 0 - 0 0 99
21 + + 0 0 98
22 0 0 - 0 101
23 0 0 0 + 94
24 0 0 0 0 102
25 0 0 0 0 99
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
6
Regression Analysis: Y2 versus X1, X2, X3, X4
The regression equation is
Y2 = 208 - 0.035 X1 - 9.12 X2 + 0.0268 X3 - 0.0501 X4
Predictor Coef SE Coef T P
Constant 207.59 83.75 2.48 0.022
X1 -0.0352 0.2026 -0.17 0.864
X2 -9.118 8.272 -1.10 0.283
X3 0.02685 0.06349 0.42 0.677
X4
-0.05011
0.04300
-1.17
0.258
S = 33.2274 R-Sq= 16.8% R-Sq(adj) = 0.1%
Analysis of Variance
Source DF SS MS F P
Regression 4 4452 1113 1.01 0.427
Residual Error 20 22081 1104
Total 24 26533
Source DFSeq SS
Source DF Seq SS
X1 1 132
X2 1 2694
X3 1 126
X4 1 1500
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
7
Unusual Observations
Obs X1 Y2 Fit SE Fit Residual St Resid
16 254 170.00 100.29 7.43 69.71 2.15R
R denotes an observation with a large standardized residual.
Figure 1:Effects Plot for Y2
3210-1-2-3
99
95
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
5
1
Standardized Effect
Pe
rce
nt
A X1
B X2
C X3
D X4
Factor Name
Not Significant
Significant
Effect Type
Normal Plot of the Standardized Effects(response is Y2, Alpha = 0.05)
Figure 2 :Residual Plots for Y2
50250-25-50
99
90
50
10
1
Residual
Per
cent
1501251007550
60
30
0
-30
Fitted Value
Res
idua
l
6040200-20-40
8
6
4
2
0
Residual
Freq
uenc
y
24222018161412108642
60
30
0
-30
Observation Order
Res
idua
l
Normal Probability Plot Versus Fits
Histogram Versus Order
Residual Plots for Y2
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
8
Figure 3:Main Effects Plot for Y2
300207
120
115
110
105
100
75
690414
120
115
110
105
100
1380953
X1
Me
an
X2
X3 X4
Main Effects Plot for Y2Data Means
Figure 4:Interaction Plot for Y2
75 690414 1380953
120
100
80
120
100
80
120
100
80
X1
X2
X3
X4
207
300
X1
5
7
X2
414
690
X3
Interaction Plot for Y2Data Means
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
9
Figure 5:Contour Plots of Y2
X2*X1
300260220
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
X3*X1
300260220
650
600
550
500
450
X4*X1
300260220
1300
1200
1100
1000
X3*X2
765
650
600
550
500
450
X4*X2
765
1300
1200
1100
1000
X4*X3
640560480
1300
1200
1100
1000
X1 207
X2 5
X3 414
X4 953
Hold Values
>
–
–
–
–
< 20
20 70
70 120
120 170
170 220
220
Y2
Contour Plots of Y2
Figure 6: Surface Plots of Y2
7100
6
150
200
200250 5
300
Y2
X2
X1
720
600100
150
200
200 480250
300
Y2
X3
X1
1400
50 1200
100
150
200
200 1000250300
Y2
X4
X1
720
600100
120
140
5
160
4806
7
Y2
X3
X2
1400
1200100
120
140
5
160
100067
Y2
X4
X2
1400
0 1200
50
100
150
480 1000600 720
Y2
X4
X3
X1 207
X2 5
X3 414
X4 953
Hold Values
Surface Plots of Y2
RESPONSE OPTIMIZATION
Parameters
Goal Lower Target Upper Weight Import
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
10
Y2 Target 50 106.58 200 1 1
Local Solution
X1 = 285.194
X2 = 5.16162
X3 = 656.545
X4 = 1181.60
Predicted Responses
Y2 = 106.82 , desirability = 0.997409
Composite Desirability = 0.989775
Figure 7:optimization plot
CurHigh
Low0.98977D
Optimal
d = 0.99835
Targ: 112.460Y1
y = 112.6046
d = 0.99741
Targ: 106.580Y2
y = 106.8221
d = 0.99915
Targ: 7.4072Y3
y = 7.4069
d = 0.99448
Targ: 2223.5020Y4
y = 2230.5515
d = 0.95765
Targ: 11.8322Y5
y = 11.7123
d = 0.99228
Targ: 28.6832Y6
y = 28.7706
0.98977Desirability
953.0
1380.0
414.0
690.0
5.0
7.0
207.0
300.0X2 X3 X4X1
[285.1943][5.1616][656.5455][1181.5960]
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
11
Figure 8:Root Mean Square Test for Non linear Regression Analysis
Non-linear results/graphs using matlabY2 results
Figure 9:Coefficient of relationship Test for Non linear Regression Analysis
Model Fitting And Validation For Strength After assessing the data graphically, the second step in
analysis is to estimate an appropriate model for each
response.
1 2 3 4 5 6 784
86
88
90
92y
Data point
RMS training set error: 0.09279 Variation explained: 99.8299 %
Predicted y (training values)
Actual y (training values)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 860
70
80
90
100
y
Data point
RMS test set error: 6.9458 Variation explained: -704.0647 %
Predicted y (test values)
Actual y (test values)
Bias Gene 1 Gene 2-50
0
50
100Gene weights
Bias Gene 1 Gene 20
0.5
1
1.5
2x 10
-5 P value (low = significant)
R squared = 0.9983 Adj. R squared = 0.99745
Advances in Engineering & Scientific Research
AESR 12|Volume 1|Issue 1|2015
12
The adequacy of each fitted model was validated
quantitatively by calculating statistical measures such as
residual standard deviation and (PRESS), and graphically
by examining residual plots. The residual standard
deviation S, for this model is O.99mpa. A value of s near
the repeatability value (replicate standard deviation
calculated from centre points) is an indication of an
adequately fitting model.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Factorial design mathematical model and a non-linear
matlab least square regression model were developed to
study and analyze the results. it is possible to analyze
accurately the positive effects of the various factors
responsible for better slumps dry (workability) and
strength of concrete produced and to optimize those factors
for quick determination of the optimum factorial
composition of concrete for any given climatic condition.
The factorial design shows the optimal production mix of
the concrete production in hot and warm climatic condition
while thmatlab non-linear regression approach was used to
see the effect of linearity and non-linearity of the data.
From the results, it shows that the dat is more of non-linear
with the coefficient of determination of the dependent and
independent variables (R2
) of 0.9963. also when adjusted
the R2
, it shows a coefficient of 0.99745. The results
however, where recommended to the construction
industries, builders and Civil engineers for their
applicability of the Optimal results and its relationships in
hot and warm humid zones of south east Nigeria.
REFERENCES
[1] Chang Hu, 2004: Construction Project Management.
Second Edition, China Construction Industry Publisher,
22-32.
[2] Koehler, E.P. and Fowler D.W. (2003): ICAR 105,
Measuring the Workability of High Fines, concrete
International Centre for Aggregates research. The
University of Texasat Austin.
[3] Liang, Shilian, (2004): Engineering Project
Management, Second edition, China: Dongbei
University of Finance and Economics. 71-79.
[4] Mahmood, K.(2005): Factors Affecting Reinforced
Concrete Construction Quality in Pakistan. CBM-CI
International Workshop, Karachi, Pakistan.
[5] Mcpharlin, (2012): Weather and How to Minimize the
Effect on Concrete Qranite Rock.
[6] Scanton, J. M. (1994): Factors Influencing Concrete
Workability P. Klieger, and J. F. Lamond, ed.
Significance of Tests Properties of Concrete and
Concrete-Making. American Society for Testing and
Materials. STP 169c, Philadelphia. P. A.
[7] WiseGeek, http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-quality-
control.htm (14.04.2010).