Analysis of Different Defect Configurations in CEBGStructures for Directive
Patterns
Arezou Edalati, Tayeb A. Denidni, and Halim Boutayeb
INRS-EMT, University of Quebec, Montreal, Canada.
CEBG principle
CEBG: Cylindrical electromagnetic band gap,
Radially and circularly periodic,
Feed in the centre,
Present pass-band and stop-band to cylindrical EM wave,
applying a defect reconfigurable directive pattern,
Defect can be create by using active element
EBG structure
CEBG Structure
Previous work: applying horn-shape defect for reconfigurable directive pattern
Advantage: 360 degree turning of the radiation pattern
draw back: need a lot of diodes (all the wires have to loaded with active element and more power supply
CEBG antenna with horn-shape defect
Lww
a Active components (ex.: Diodes)
Reconfigurable EBG structure
Solution1previous work
structure composed of discontinuous metallic wires, defects consisting of continuous wires.
Advantage: Reduction the power supply dc current by 75%
Drawback: Narrowband Number of diode is the
same
Solution 2Apply different defect configuration
Directivity of different configuration
far-field proprieties are investigated through an examination of the two-dimensional directivity
Ez is the transverse component of the total electric field in the far filed region, calculated with the FDTD method
Directivity vs. Frequency
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.08
10
12
14
16
18
Dire
ctiv
ity (
dB)
Freq(GHz)
Defect3 Defect4 Defect5
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.08
10
12
14
16
18
Dire
ctiv
ity (
dB)
Freq(GHZ)
Horn Defect 1 Defect 2
Radiation Pattern
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Freq=1.3 GHz Freq=1.5 GHz Freq=2 GHz Freq=2.5 GHz Freq=3 GHz
Horn Defect 1
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Freq=1.3 GHz Freq=1.5 GHz Freq=2 GHz Freq=2.5 GHz Freq=3 GHz
Defect 3
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Ferq=1.3 GHz Ferq=1.5 GHz Ferq=2 GHz Ferq=2.5 GHz Ferq=3 GHz
Defect 2
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Freq=1.3 GHz Freq=1.5 GHz Freq=2 GHz Freq=2.5 GHz Freq=3 GHz
Radiation Pattern
Defect 5
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Freq=1.3 GHz Freq=1.5 GHz Freq=2 GHz Freq=2.5 GHz Freq=3 GHz
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Freq=1.3 GHz Freq=1.5 GHz Freq=2 GHz Freq=2.5 GHz Freq=3 GHz
Defect 4
Radiation Pattern
Conclusion The best defect configuration is Defect1 in term of radiation
pattern, directivity and band width
60% reduction of active element and power supply compare to Horn configuration
They have almost the same band width