+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: shuchihere
View: 224 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 172

Transcript
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    1/172

    Summer PlacementIn

    SIR GANGA RAM HOSPITAL

    (April 4 - May 30, 2011)

    Analyses of discrepancies between manual and automatedRE-ORDER LEVEL / RE -ORDER QUANTITY of drugs

    Dr. SHUCHI VASHISHTHA

    Post-graduate Programme in Hospital & HealthManagement,New Delhi

    2010-12

    International Institute of Health Management Research, NewDelhi

    1

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    2/172

    2011

    2

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    3/172

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    I hereby take this opportunity to thank, Dr R. K. Ganjoo, Director Medical for giving me the

    opportunity to do my Summer Training at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital. He was very kind

    enough to give his valuable guidance and advice. He inspired me greatly to work in this

    project. His willingness to motivate me contributed tremendously to my project.

    My special thanks to Dr. Karanveer Singh, Consultant Surgeon and Head of Medical

    Informatics

    And Head IT, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital for his guidance, support, interest, involvement and

    encouragement. He has left no stone unturned in updating me regarding the subject.

    I wish to express my deep sense of gratitude to Dr. Gurvinder Kaur, Deputy MedicalSuperintendent, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital for her guidance and support throughout. She was

    very kind enough to spare her valuable time and provided several important suggestions at

    every stage of my study.

    Besides, I would also like to thank the entire Healthcare IT team and the Hospital Staff for

    their encouragement and cooperation in carrying out the project work.

    My sincere acknowledgement goes to Professor Indrajit Bhattacharya and Professor

    Aanandhi Ramachandran for their kind assistance and support throughout my dissertation.

    Finally, an honorable mention goes to my family and friends for their understanding and

    support on me in completing this project.

    Thank You

    Dr. Shuchi Vashishtha

    PGDHHM,

    IIHMR, New Delhi

    3

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    4/172

    4

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    5/172

    FEEDBACK FORM

    Name of the Student:

    Summer Training Institution:

    Area of Summer Internship:

    Attendance:

    Objectives met:

    Deliverables:

    Strengths:

    Suggestions for Improvement:

    Signature of the Officer-in-Charge

    (Training)

    5

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    6/172

    DatePlace

    6

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    7/172

    Table of contents

    1. Acronyms / Abbreviations

    5

    2. Hospital/organization profile

    63. Introduction

    8

    Hospital information system

    8

    Objectives of HIS

    9

    Advantages of HIS

    9

    Workflow of pharmacy

    14 Re-order Level

    17

    Re-order quantity 18

    Maximum stock level

    18

    Minimum stock level

    18

    Lead time

    19

    Buffer quantity19

    Area of engagement

    21

    1. Method and Data

    24

    2. General Findings

    31

    3. Conclusion

    38

    4. Case study Introduction

    41

    Methodology

    45

    7

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    8/172

    Observation

    47

    Recommendation

    65

    Conclusion

    66

    1. References

    68

    2. Annexure 70

    Acronyms / Abbreviations

    HIS Hospital information system

    ROL Re order level

    ROQ Re order quantity

    PO Purchase order

    IP In patient

    CSSD Central sterilization and supply department

    GRN Goods received note

    8

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    9/172

    Hospital/organization profile

    Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (India)

    Sir Ganga Ram Hospital is a 650-bed multi-specialty state-of-the-art hospital in Delhi. It

    provides comprehensive health care services, and has acquired the status of a premier

    medical institution. It is one of the hospitals in the private sector that has maintained nearly

    100% bed occupancy due to its reputation of providing the highest level of medical services

    to patients from Delhi and all over India.

    History / Location / Area

    The hospital was founded initially in 1921 at Lahore by Sir Ganga Ram (1851-1927), a civil

    engineer and leading philanthropist of his times. After the partition in 1947, the present

    hospital was established in Rajindra Nagar in New Delhi on a plot of land approximately

    11 acres (45,000 m2). The foundation was laid in April 1951 by the then Prime Minister of

    India Shri Jawaharlal Nehru and inaugurated by him on 13 April 1954.

    9

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delhihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Ganga_Ramhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jawahar_Lal_Nehruhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Ganga_Ramhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jawahar_Lal_Nehruhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delhi
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    10/172

    Departments

    Critical Care and Emergency Medicine

    Institute for Child Health (with state of the art neonatology services)

    Institute of Renal Sciences (nephrology, urology and kidney transplantation)

    Institute of Minimal Access, Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery

    Gastroenterology

    Surgical Gastroenterology & Liver Transplantation

    Neurosciences (medical, surgical and spinal surgery) Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery

    Cosmetic and Plastic Surgery

    Clinical Hematology & Bone Marrow Transplantation

    Joint Replacement

    ENT and Cochlear Implantation

    Ophthalmology

    Peripheral Vascular and Endo vascular Surgery

    Medical Genetics

    In-vitro Fertilization

    Medical and Surgical Oncology

    Blood Transfusion Services

    10

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    11/172

    Introduction

    Hospital information system:

    According to U.S. National Library of Medicine HIS is an integrated, computer-assisted

    system designed to store, manipulate and retrieve information concerned with the

    administrative and clinical aspects.

    As an area of medical informatics the aim of HIS is to achieve the best possible support of

    patient care and administration by electronic data processing. It helps to integrate all the

    departments through the electronic records.

    Hospital Information system (HIS) is a computerized software that helps in various

    activities of the Hospital. HIS is expected to perform following activities:

    Patient Registration . Admission

    Emergency Nursing Activities

    Laboratory Investigations Radiology Tests

    Pharmacy Management Medical Consumables

    Operations CSSD

    11

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    12/172

    Diet Management Discharges

    Billing Purchase

    Finance HR etc.

    Objectives of HIS

    1. To increase the operational efficiency of the hospital.

    2. To increase the operational effectiveness of the hospital.3. To reduce human error.

    4. To reduce operational cost.

    Advantages of HIS in a hospital

    Provides continuous medical record for each patient.

    12

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    13/172

    Helps in billing for medication

    Result of a test can be compared

    .

    History of diagnosis, operations and medicines can be obtained.

    13

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    14/172

    Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) can be done

    Interaction alerts are provided.

    14

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    15/172

    Allergy alerts are provided

    .

    15

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    16/172

    Drug monographs are given.

    Drug substitution can be done.

    16

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    17/172

    Helps in inventory control, etc.

    17

    http://www.google.co.in/imgres?imgurl=http://cdn.imedicalapps.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/2011-03-27_21-45-47_PX-364x273.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.imedicalapps.com/2011/03/blackberry-medical-apps-epocrates-essentials-app-review/&usg=__Acmvt_7Kre3FsHhrSXjZuxahTvs=&h=273&w=364&sz=27&hl=en&start=9&zoom=1&tbnid=rLZdSuBUcBdgvM:&tbnh=91&tbnw=121&ei=vBHeTcerO8rogQfcoPjTCg&prev=/search?q=drug+monograph+in+hospital+information+system&hl=en&sa=G&biw=1345&bih=566&gbv=2&tbm=isch&itbs=1http://www.google.co.in/imgres?imgurl=http://cdn.imedicalapps.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/2011-03-27_21-45-47_PX-364x273.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.imedicalapps.com/2011/03/blackberry-medical-apps-epocrates-essentials-app-review/&usg=__Acmvt_7Kre3FsHhrSXjZuxahTvs=&h=273&w=364&sz=27&hl=en&start=9&zoom=1&tbnid=rLZdSuBUcBdgvM:&tbnh=91&tbnw=121&ei=vBHeTcerO8rogQfcoPjTCg&prev=/search?q=drug+monograph+in+hospital+information+system&hl=en&sa=G&biw=1345&bih=566&gbv=2&tbm=isch&itbs=1
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    18/172

    Sir Gangaram hospital is using Intersystems TrakCare as its HIS and Cache as the

    database. Earlier it was using Fox Pro system for 20 years. The implementation of

    Intersystems TrakCare started in 2005 in phases. It was implemented in pharmacy in

    2007.

    Various Modules of HIS at SGRH

    Pharmacy management is a crucial part of HIS functions. The pharmacy management deals

    with the maintenance of drugs and consumables in the hospital. The functions of this

    module include, online drug prescription, inventory management of drugs and consumables.

    This module optionally handles the billing of drugs and consumables, if required. The

    Pharmacy module ensures that there is a round the clock availability of a sufficient quantity

    of drugs and consumable material for the patients in a mode that neither hinders efficient

    clinical work, nor it becomes a threat to the survival of the Pharmacy.

    18

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    19/172

    Workflow of pharmacy:

    Indent is transferred from ward to pharmacy.

    Then it is further transferred to main pharmacy (godown).

    19

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    20/172

    Then a purchase requisition (ROL/ROQ) is made to purchase

    department.

    Purchase department makes purchase order (PO).

    PO goes to vender.

    Vender supplies goods receiving notes (GRN) to the receiving department

    Stock gets replenished.

    Re order level

    Stock consumption

    (packing )

    Purchase order

    Stock increaseDelivery and GRN

    20

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    21/172

    But before raising the request pharmacy has to calculate a re-order quantity. In order to

    estimate the minimum quantity of goods required the pharmacy manager should know the

    following

    How much in hand. At what point to re order?

    How much to order.

    (Desselle S. P. and Zgarrick D P,):

    ROQ is calculated by taking into consideration certain factors like: lead time, re-order level,

    minimum quantity, maximum quantity and buffer quantity.

    21

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    22/172

    Re-order Level:

    This is the minimum stock level of an item at which a new order for supply of stock is to be

    placed. In other words, at this level a purchase requisition is made out.

    The reorder point for replenishment of stock occurs when the level ofinventory drops down

    to zero. In view of instantaneous replenishment of stock the level of inventory jumps to the

    original level from zero level. (Khan, M.Y.; & Jain, P.K.)

    In real life situations one never encounters a zero lead time. There is always a time lag from

    the date of placing an order for material and the date on which materials are received. As a

    result the reorder point is always higher than zero, and if the firm places the order when the

    inventory reaches the reorder point, the new goods will arrive before the firm runs out of

    22

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inventoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_timehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inventoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_time
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    23/172

    goods to sell. The decision on how much stock to hold is generally referred to as the order

    point problem, that is, how low should the inventory be depleted before it is reordered.

    In reality, demand during any time period is uncertain. When demand is uncertain, a natural

    question is "How low one should let ones inventory level goes before placing an order?" We

    call the inventory level at which an order should be placed the reorder level. Clearly, a high

    reorder level will lower shortage costs and increase holding costs. Similarly, a low reorder

    level will increase shortage costs and lower holding costs. At some intermediate value for

    the reorder level, the sum of shortage and holding costs will be minimized. (Winston W. L.)

    The re-order level can be calculated by using the following formula:-

    Re-order level = Average daily consumption *(Lead

    time + Minimum inventory days)

    Re-order quantity:

    It is the quantities to be ordered once the re order level is reached.

    According to Accounting Terms Dictionary Inventory level of an item which signals the

    need for placement of a replenishment order, taking into account the consumption of the

    item during order lead time and the quantity required for the safety stock.

    The reorder quantity can be calculated by using the following formula:-

    Re-order quantity = Maximum stock level (Stock in

    hand +Quantity already in

    purchase / delivery pipeline)

    Maximum stock level:

    23

    http://www.businesstermsdictionary.com/accounting/http://www.businesstermsdictionary.com/accounting/
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    24/172

    Maximum stock level is the maximum amount of stock you should maintain to avoid

    wastage of drugs due to expiration.

    The maximum stock level can be calculated by using the following formula:-

    Maximum stock level = Reorder level + (Average daily

    consumption * Optimum stock holding days)

    Minimum stock level:

    The minimum level or minimum stock is that level of stock below which stock should not

    be allowed to fall. Stock replenishment should occur before this.

    The minimum stock level can be calculated by using the following formula:-

    Minimum stock level = (Average daily consumption *

    Minimum inventory days) + Buffer stock.

    Lead time:

    A time gap from the date of submission of purchase request to the purchase department for

    an item to the date on which that item is received.

    24

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    25/172

    Buffer quantity:

    A supply of inputs held as a reserve to safeguardagainstunforeseen shortages ordemands.

    This is done for life saving drugs.

    Objective of the study

    The pharmacy in a hospital is an area where the medical and non-medical components of a

    hospital information system (HIS) meet. Alongside inventory control are components

    relating to drug allergy warnings, drug-drug interaction alerts and intelligent pharmaceutical

    substitution of prescribed drugs from within current inventory stock. Sir Ganga Ram

    Hospital, New Delhi, went in for enterprise wide computerization of its hospital, including

    25

    http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/supply.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/held.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/reserve.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/safeguard.htmlhttp://www.investorwords.com/8787/against.htmlhttp://www.investorwords.com/8787/against.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/shortage.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/demand.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/supply.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/held.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/reserve.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/safeguard.htmlhttp://www.investorwords.com/8787/against.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/shortage.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/demand.html
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    26/172

    its pharmacy in June 2007. The hospital has an in-house pharmacy with a daily turnover of

    over Rs 13 lakhs. Now the pharmacy is totally computerized except for the process of

    making purchase requisition, which is in process of being automated.

    The main features of pharmacy module are:

    Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)

    The care providers are able to place medication orders in the system at the ward

    level itself. This allows the hospital to also limit the number of medicines they can

    order. The list of medicines visible to care providers can also be limited initially to

    only those that are listed in the hospital formulary. Since formulary drugs are

    available at a much lower price than non-formulary drugs, their purchase price

    having been negotiated with the vendor, it adds up to a substantial cost saving. In

    case the care provider does not find the medication in the formulary list, he has the

    option to uncheck the 'Limit to Formulary' box and see all medicines.

    Interaction alerts

    The HIS system warns of drug-drug interactions and gives details of each interaction

    type. However to be really useful, all medication prescription entries need to done in

    the system by the doctor who is more likely to attend to the alert than if the same

    entry is being done by a nurse on the behest of a doctor.

    26

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    27/172

    Allergy alerts

    Allergy alerts are also provided by the system. In case the patient has been flagged to

    be allergic to a particular medication, even during a previous visit to the hospital,

    such alert information is carried forward during the lifetime of the patient, unless

    manually cancelled by a care provider. The system does not stop the prescription

    from going through; it simply warns the doctor.

    Drug monographs

    Drug details (monographs) are available in the system. A doctor can click on a drug

    he is planning to prescribe and read up details on the indications, dosage, side

    effects, interactions, etc. This data had been provided to the hospital as part of the

    drug database that was purchased prior to starting the system.

    Drug substitution

    Intelligent drug substitution works by substituting another drug only if the generic

    drug, strength, drug form, route and unit of packing are the same for both the drugs.

    Thus, tablet Crocin does not substitute with injection Calpol. Nor does tablet Crocin

    250 mg substitute with tablet Calpol 500 mg. It also will not substitute Tetanus

    Toxoid vial with Tetanus Toxoid ampoule, since the packing unit is not the same.

    Inventory control

    At any time it is possible to know the medicine stock lying at various sub stores.

    This also allows moving stocks from a location where they are in excess to areas

    where they are urgently needed. It also allows to recall a batch from circulation

    should it be required, since we can trace movements of each batch to various sub

    stores as well as patients to whom they had been dispensed.

    Billing for medication

    Each batch of a drug has a price attached to it at the time of receiving the drug in the

    27

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    28/172

    hospital's receiving section. This is what gets billed to each patient without any

    additional user intervention.

    Indent :

    The indent is raised by the nursing station and other departments to the main store (like IP

    pharmacy). It can be defined as the request for the items intended to be used on a patient or

    for internal consumption of the department.

    Types of indent

    Emergency:

    28

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    29/172

    Emergency medicines are urgent or immediate medicines. This means they are

    required RIGHT NOW. If the ward nurses send indent as emergency medicines then

    nurses go to collect the medicine from IP pharmacy within 30 min.

    Stat:

    Stat medicine is a medicine whose ideal time for receiving is within 1hr.it is also an

    urgent medicine. If a patient needs stat medicine then nurses send the indent as stat.

    Normal:

    Normal medicines are those medicines which are required on daily basis and they

    are not so urgent. Time for receiving normal medicine is within 24 hrs.

    In Sir Gangaram Hospital the formation of pharmacy indent is a manual process whichrequires at least 4 days. Now the hospital is trying to make the whole process automated by

    using HIS in pharmacy. The process of making indent automatic is in its pre implementation

    phase. This is a base line study based on which complete re order quantity will be

    automated.

    A pilot run of the automated indent was done. The project allotted to me is to analyze

    discrepancies between the existing manual and the pilot run of automated RE-ORDER

    QUANTITY of drugs, to find out the accuracy of automated technique and if there are any

    discrepancies and suggest interventions to improve it.

    29

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    30/172

    METHODOLOGY

    Method and Data

    The study is analytical in nature. It is based on secondary data collection.

    The formation of indent happens in both TrakCare and prodigious modules of HIS. In

    TrakCare the transfer of indent from ward to pharmacy and then to godown is done. The

    purchase requisition, purchase order and GRN are made in prodigious. The change in stock

    level happens simultaneously in both.

    30

    TrakCareoduct

    mission, Ordering, Nursing, Stock Issue, Radiology etc.

    TrakCareoduct

    mission, Ordering, Nursing, Stock Issue, Radiology etc.

    ProdigiousIndian Product

    For Back office

    Modules: Purchase, Stock Receiving, Finance, HRD, As

    ProdigiousIndian Product

    For Back office

    Modules: Purchase, Stock Receiving, Finance, HRD, As

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    31/172

    The nursing station and other departments raise the indent to the main stores (like IP

    pharmacy) Nursing station/wards/ ICUs/ emergency raise Patient indents on HIS based on

    IPID (for items charged to patients) and Day care nursing station (dialysis, procedure room,

    day care OT) raise Day care patient indents based on UHID (for items charged to patients)

    and then main store IP pharmacy acknowledges patient indent on HIS.

    The pharmacy in Gangaram hospital is totally computerized except the process of making

    pharmacy purchase requisition. The indent formation is a manual process in Gangaram.

    Now the hospital is trying to make it a computerized process. In order to check the accuracy

    of computerized process a pilot run of automated ROQ was done.

    MANUAL PROCESS OF RAISING INDENT

    31

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    32/172

    32

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    33/172

    Manual indent

    33

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    34/172

    34

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    35/172

    In the main pharmacy stock movement report for 2 months is generated. Out ofwhich average for one month is extracted.

    [(Stock in hand) (Average for 1 month)] = Purchase request

    This request is then sent to purchase department for creation of purchaseorder.

    Problems with the manual process of raising indent

    It is a Time consuming process.

    Most of the time the drugs already in pipeline are not considered.

    The risks of human errors are high.

    Drugs are left from being added in the indent

    Some generic drugs are added more than once.

    These problems are addressed in computerized process

    35

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    36/172

    COMPUTERISED PROCESS OF RAISING THE PILOT RUN

    The data for the ROL report was extracted from the prodigious module of

    HIS.

    36

    The data for the ROL report was extracted from the prodigious module of HIS.The data for the ROL report was extracted from the prodigious module of HIS.

    Ported in Microsoft access database.Ported in Microsoft access database.

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    37/172

    In the manual process the data is collected by using the brand names but in the automated

    process the data is collected by using generic names. Using generic names avoids chances of

    repetition of drug thus avoids ordering of extra quantity of drugs.

    During manual process most of the times pipeline is not considered but in automated

    technique it is considered every time.

    The collection of data in manual technique requires 4 days minimum but it takes just 5 to 10

    minutes in automated technique to generate the report. And further 2-3 hrs are required for

    further processing.

    37

    Thus the report was generated after further processing.Thus the report was generated after further processing.

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    38/172

    General Findings

    The raising of purchase requisition is a manual process in sir Gangaram hospital, now the

    hospital is trying to make it a computerized process. In order to reach the desired goal the

    information and technology department generated formulae to calculate ROL, ROQ etc. A

    pilot run was done in order to check the accuracy of the computerized process.

    The purpose of my study was to analyze the discrepancies between the existing manual and

    the pilot run of automated RE-ORDER QUANTITY of drugs and to find out the accuracy of

    automated technique.

    In order to fulfill the purpose of the study the two reports were collected. The two reports

    were ported in the Microsoft excel format for further analysis. The analysis was done on the

    basis of any differences found between the amount indented in both manual indent and the

    computerized ROL report.

    The automated ROL report was taken as the basis of the study and it was further compared

    with the manual report and thus the differences found were named as discrepancies. The

    analysis was done by comparing both the dataes and finding the differences between them.

    The answers were then plotted as graphs.

    The data used for analysis was as follows:

    A total of 740 drugs were reported in Manually Prepared Indent

    based on 2 month consumption.

    A total of631 drugs were reported in automaticROL Reportbased on

    3 month consumption.

    38

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    39/172

    One of the main draw backs of raising an indent manually is that it is a time consuming

    process. And also there is a significant amount of labor lost. This labor and time can be

    utilized in doing something more productive. The manual process requires a time period of

    at least 4 days to raise the purchase requisition whereas in automatic process report was

    generated in just 5 min. and further 3 hrs more are required for further processing.

    The total numbers of drugs indented in computerized ROL report are 601 out of which 203

    drugs were found to have different values in both the reports. Thus on analysis around 32%

    discrepancies was found between the manual and automated ROL report. This means that

    due to some reason either manual report was showing some mistakes or automated ROL

    report had done some mistake.

    39

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    40/172

    Purchase requisition is made by the main pharmacy store to the purchase department

    and then purchase department sends a purchase order to the vendor. Some times

    when drugs are ordered in a particular amount and are supplied in lesser amount by

    the vendor the drugs left are said to be in pipeline and sometimes the drug has

    already been ordered but not supplied then again it is said to be in pipeline. It is very

    important to keep in mind the status of drugs in pipeline because if not considered it

    may lead to crossing of maximum stock level.

    Out of total discrepancy in ROL report 54% were due to items being already in

    pipeline which had not been considered in the manual indent.ie out of 203 drugs

    with discrepancies 110 drugs were already in pipeline and were ordered again.

    One of the main defects of a manual indent is the high risk of human errors.

    Sometimes few generic drugs are ordered more than once because of the

    dissimilarities in the brand names and cost. This factor is again very important

    because if a generic drug is being ordered more than once then there is a high risk of

    its crossing the maximum stock value and can be overstocked and thus get wasted

    due to multiple reasons like expiration, breaking etc.

    Out of total discrepancy in ROL report 5% were found to be the items had

    accidentally been included multiple times in the manual ROL report. This

    means that out of 203 discrepancies found between manual indent and automated

    ROL report 13 cases had been accidentally ordered multiple times.

    .

    Some drugs have an average daily consumption much higher than other drugs these

    drugs are called as fast moving drugs. The importance of these drugs is that the

    consumption rate of such drugs is very high thus if these drugs are ordered either in

    40

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    41/172

    higher amounts or in lower amounts the drugs might cross the maximum or

    minimum stock level.

    The total discrepancy in fast moving drugs was found to be aprox. 19%. Thus this

    means that out of total 203 discrepancies found between manual indent and

    automated ROL report 39 drugs were found to be fast moving.

    The raising of indent being a manual process the risk of human errors is very high.

    Sometimes it happens that some of the drugs are missed in indent. Thus might result

    in crossing the minimum stock level. And during urgent need of the drug the drug

    may not be present in the stores. Thus it is again a serious drawback of manualprocess.

    The total discrepancy in costly drugs was found to be approx. 11% of total

    discrepancies in ROL report.ie out of total 203 drugs with discrepancies 23 drugs

    were costly. The importance of costly drugs is that if these drugs are ordered in high

    amounts and thus are over stocked hospital loses its money due to wastage and if

    these are ordered in lees amount than desired the drug may not be available in case

    of emergency.

    Conclusion

    The purpose of the study was to find out the discrepancies between manual indent and the

    automated ROL pilot run report and to find out the accuracy of the automated process. The

    following advantages and disadvantages were observed in the pilot run during the study.

    41

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    42/172

    A dvantages:

    The time consumption in raising the indent reduces from 4 days to 5 min.

    Reduces human errors.

    The drugs in pipeline are always considered.

    No drug is left from including in indent.

    No generic drug is ordered more than once.

    Reduces the risk of reaching minimum inventory level.

    Reduces the risk of crossing maximum inventory level.

    DISADVANTAGES OF AUTOMATED ROL REPORT

    * Although it studies dynamic usage patterns, these are based on past trends. It cannot

    predict future trends, for instance the onset of the flu season, requiring advance stocking of

    antipyretics.

    * The computerized ROL report is an advisory report and some further manual

    processing is still required, for instance rounding off of the request quantity to match the

    nearest packaging available. However this process adds only a couple of hours to the

    exercise, effectively reducing the time from 4 days (manual) to 3 hours (automated).

    * There are still some technical problems in the computerized process like correction

    of master drug data, few drugs were not ordered in the computerized process etc these

    problems have to be delt with before implementation.

    42

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    43/172

    Thus this can be concluded that though there is some manual activity still required, but

    the advantages of using the automatic process is far more than the manual process.

    It is suggested that this report should only be implemented after the corrections have

    been done because it involves inventory (monetary) considerations. Thus the

    implementation of automatic indent is recommended after some more analysis has been

    done.

    43

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    44/172

    CASE STUDY

    ANALYSIS OF REVENUE & EXPENDITURE

    OF DAYCARE GYNAECOLOGY PACKAGES

    USING SPEEDMINER

    44

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    45/172

    Introduction

    Hospitals using a hospital information system (HIS) accumulate a huge amount of

    transactional data during their daily activities. Extracting these data in an analyzable form to

    maximize the benefits of the HIS is rarely given importance. If the hospital wants to extract

    data using ad hoc criteria, e.g. elderly female patients being admitted under the cardiology

    services with acute myocardial infarction with a length of stay of more than one month, it is

    impossible to use readymade MIS reports. This is where a data mining software tool comes

    in handy.

    Data mining is the process in which there is analysis of data from different angle and

    perspectives and summarizing the same data into the relevant information. This kind of

    information could be utilized to increase the revenue, cutting the costs or both. (Malick Md)

    Data mining software is mainly used for analyzing data and also assists in accumulation of

    data for the different sources and categorizes and summarizes the given data into some

    useful form

    The data mining gives a chance or opportunity to enhance the future performance of the

    business organization. There is a common philosophical phrase that, he who does not learnfrom the history is destined to repeat the same. Therefore, if these predictions are done with

    the help and assistance of the historical information (data), then you can get sufficient data

    for improvising the products of the business organization.

    Data mining tools allow on-the-fly data analysis. One simply selects the criteria to be

    studied and the data are updated immediately. One can add more criteria and the data are

    updated each time. Sir Gangaram is using speed miner as the data mining tool. Speedminer

    DW and BPM is one the most comprehensive and fully integrated sets of data warehouse,business intelligence and business performance management solution available. Speedminer

    not only assists in uncovering the wealth of information in the corporation to build the best

    45

    http://www.expertstown.com/category/business-intelligence/data-mining/http://www.expertstown.com/category/business-intelligence/data-mining/
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    46/172

    Business Intelligence platform, but also to manage the performance of the business so that

    the business will always stay ahead of competition and excel.

    Modern day hospitals provide a variety of services to patients under one roof. It is akin to a

    large service organization considering the number of personnel involved and the capital-

    intensive nature of the business be it the civil structures, operation theaters & equipment,

    diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, resuscitation equipment, gas lines, surgical

    instruments, consumables, etc. Moreover, it is 24 x 7 operations with people playing a vital

    role in the well being of the patients in the hospital.

    Earlier the hospitals were the place where a patient used to come to get good care. The

    scenario in the past few years has changed dramatically within the healthcare industry.

    Established names in the industry are facing tremendous competition from the newcomers.

    Thus, each hospital has to be competitive both in terms of the quality of services as well as

    cost management.

    Until a few years ago, it was practically absurd to think of a Marketing function within a

    hospital. That situation is pass with almost every hospital worth its salt employing

    marketing professionals to attract new corporate. Hospitals also employ Loyalty Cards,

    Discount Health cards to attract and retain customers.

    46

    SpeedminerMalaysian Product

    Web Based

    Data mining tool

    Allows to create queries and reports on the fly

    SpeedminerMalaysian Product

    Web Based

    Data mining tool

    Allows to create queries and reports on the fly

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    47/172

    One of the few ways of attracting and retaining customers is to offer different types of

    packages like cardiac health care packages. Diabetes healthcare packages, gynecological

    packages etc. These packages have few tests attached with them. The charge for these tests

    as a package is less than the sum of the cost of all the tests if opted without a package.

    Sir Ganga Ram Hospital is a 650-bed multi-specialty state-of-the-art hospital in Delhi. It

    provides comprehensive health care services, and has acquired the status of a premier

    medical institution. It is one of the hospitals in the private sector that has maintained nearly

    100% bed occupancy due to its reputation of providing the highest level of medical services

    to patients from Delhi and all over India.

    In order to serve its patients well Sir Gangaram Hospital has also offered many packages.

    These packages are available for many cases with different features and varying costs. Thepatients choose the package according to the need and the affordability.

    Gynecology department is one of the very important departments in a hospital. It is one of

    the high revenue earning part of a hospital. Thus the hospital has offered six gynecological

    packages in order to attract and retain its customers. These packages are of different cost

    and different features:

    Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy and D&C package

    Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy and LEEP package

    Colposcopy & Cautery package

    Colposcopy & LEEP package

    Diagnostic hysteroscopy with D&C package

    MTP package

    47

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delhihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delhi
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    48/172

    Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (SGRH), a pioneer in health informatics, has been using data

    mining with Speed Miner, a data mining software product by Hesper. Speed Miner was

    installed as an adjunct to HIS at SGRH in 2008 and has proved to be an effective business

    intelligence tool which helps in data analytics and real time monitoring of the Key

    Performance Indicators (KPI), query handling, and serves as a quality dashboard through

    the various data collated over a period of time under specific heads.

    Data analytics focuses on inference, the process of deriving a conclusion based solely on

    scientific knowledge and facts. At a time when health organizations are operating in a

    competitive environment and want to wring value for every penny spent, data analytics will

    provide them with the strong foundation and confidence they need to excel with minimized

    risk. Recently, the health care organizations are using data as a part of Business Intelligence,to make strategic decisions and choices, and to gain competitive edge in global markets.

    Today, analytic strategy is viewed as a key engine of a dynamic capability of an

    organization.

    Sir Gangaram hospital started using Speedminer as their data mining tool in 2008. It was

    used to analyze the various packages available at the hospital. The data that was extracted

    revealed that the hospital was having loss in its gynecological packages. On analysis it was

    found that the cost of the packages was much less than the amount hospital was spending on

    its patient. By fine-tuning of the packages hospital was able to cut the losses and at the same

    time make them more competitive and attractive to patients.

    Objective of the study

    The objective of the study is to:

    Do profitability analysis of gynecological packages using Speedminer.

    48

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    49/172

    Suggest recommendations to improve he scenario.

    Methodology

    The speed miner is used as data mining tool in Sir Gangaram Hospital. In sir Gangaram

    hospital various gynecological packages are there. These packages are of different cost and

    different features:

    Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy and D&C package

    Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy and LEEP package

    Colposcopy & Cautery package

    Colposcopy & LEEP package

    Diagnostic hysteroscopy with D&C package

    MTP package

    In order to extract the data a query has to be put in the speed minor and the data can

    be extracted. For example in order to find the data for Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy

    and D&C package charges the query was put in the speed miner and thus the data

    was extracted. The data was collected in the similar manner for all the six packages.

    It was then ported into Microsoft excel format and then further analysis was done.

    It is an analytical type of study. The data is secondary. Total data used for all the

    packages are (i.e. no. of patients who opted for it)

    Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy and D&C package 43 patients

    Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy and LEEP package 155 patients

    Colposcopy & Cautery package 8 patients

    49

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    50/172

    Colposcopy & LEEP package 87 patients

    Diagnostic hysteroscopy with D&C package 845 patients

    MTP package 835 patients

    50

    Extracting the data via customized query through

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    51/172

    Observation

    The data collected via Speedminer were then ported in the Microsoft excel

    format. Then the data was further analyzed. The payer bill amount was

    compared with the package rate. The payer bill amount is the amount that the

    patient was expected to pay if he had not opted to take the package thus this is

    the cost that is borne by the hospital). The analysis was done for four financial

    years. For the first two years it was found that the payer bill amount is much

    higher than the package rate thus the hospital was suffering a big amount of

    loss. In the subsequent years it was found that the amount difference has been

    significantly reduced but hospital is still suffering some loss.

    Analysis for Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy and D&C package

    Profitability analysis for all the patients

    The analysis of all the patients who opted for Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy and

    D&C package for the time period between 11/06/07 to 31/03/11 was done and

    it was found that for the time period between 11/06/07 to 31/03/09 the package

    rate was Rs6000 and the minimum payer bill amount was Rs8785 and

    maximum was Rs15841 and for the time period between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11

    51

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    52/172

    the package rate was Rs8000. And the minimum payer bill amount was

    Rs2558 and maximum was Rs8575. The graph clearly shows the difference

    between the package rate and cost to the hospital (payer bill amount) for both

    time periods.

    For two financial year s between 11/06/07 to 31/03/09

    The package rate for this duration was Rs6000 and out of 16 patients the

    average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs12963.56.

    Thus the hospital had to borne RS 6963.56 more i.e. the lost suffered byhospital was Rs6963.56.

    For two financial year s between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11

    The package rate for this duration was Rs8000 and out of 27 patients the

    average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs8115.5. Thus

    the hospital had to borne RS115.5more i.e. the lost suffered by hospitalwas Rs115.5

    Profitability analysis of the financial years.

    By plotting a graph loss borne by the hospital for the two durations it can

    be clearly understood that the hospital has reduced the loss by significant

    amount but still the loss is there.

    52

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    53/172

    Analysis for Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy and LEEP package

    Profitability analysis for all the patients

    The analysis of all the patients who opted for Colposcopy, Hysteroscopy and

    LEEP package for the time period between 19/06/07 to 31/03/11 was done and

    it was found that for the time period between 19/06/07 to 31/03/09 the package

    rate was Rs7000 and the minimum payer bill amount was Rs8870 and

    maximum was Rs16826 and for the time period between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11

    the package rate was Rs9000. And the minimum payer bill amount wasRs5613 and maximum was Rs11592. The graph clearly shows the difference

    between the package rate and cost to the hospital (payer bill amount) for both

    time periods.

    For two financial year s between 19/06/07 to 31/03/09

    The package rate for this duration was Rs7000 and out of 62 patients theaverage cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs14163.62.

    Thus the hospital had to borne RS 7163.62 more i.e. the lost suffered by

    hospital was Rs7163.62.

    For the two financial year s between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11

    53

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    54/172

    The package rate for this duration was Rs9000 and out of 93 patients the

    average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs9331.45.

    Thus the hospital had to borne RS 331.45 more i.e. the lost suffered by

    hospital was Rs331.45

    P rofitability analysis of the financial years.

    By plotting a graph loss borne by the hospital for the two durations it

    can be clearly understood that the hospital has reduced the loss by

    significant amount but still the loss is there.

    Analysis for Colposcopy & Cautery package

    Profitability analysis for all the patients

    The analysis of all the patients who opted for Colposcopy, & Cautery package

    for the time period between 19/06/07 to 31/03/11 was done and it was found

    that for the time period between 19/06/07 to 31/03/09 the package rate was

    Rs1200 and the minimum payer bill amount was Rs2655 and maximum was

    Rs13178 and for the time period between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11 the package

    rate was Rs2600. And the minimum payer bill amount was Rs2718 and

    maximum was Rs2768. The graph clearly shows the difference between the

    package rate and cost to the hospital (payer bill amount) for both time periods.

    54

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    55/172

    For the two financial year s between 19/06/07 to 31/03/09

    The package rate for this duration was Rs1200and out of 6 patients the

    average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs5040.17.

    Thus the hospital had to borne RS 3840.17 more i.e. the lost suffered by

    hospital was Rs3840.17.

    For the two financial year s between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11

    The package rate for this duration was Rs2600 and out of 2 patients the

    average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs2743. Thus

    the hospital had to borne RS 143 more i.e. the lost suffered by hospital

    was Rs143.

    P rofitability analysis of the financial years.

    By plotting a graph loss borne by the hospital for the two durations it can beclearly understood that the hospital has reduced the loss by significant amount

    but still the loss is there.

    55

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    56/172

    Analysis for Colposcopy & LEEP package

    Profitability analysis for all the patients

    The analysis of all the patients who opted for Colposcopy and LEEP package

    for the time period between 19/06/07 to 31/03/11 was done and it was found

    that for the time period between 19/06/07 to 31/03/09 the package rate was

    Rs2900 and the minimum payer bill amount was Rs4838 and maximum was

    Rs8336 and for the time period between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11 the package rate

    was Rs4500. And the minimum payer bill amount was Rs3460 and maximum

    was Rs9108. The graph clearly shows the difference between the package rate

    and cost to the hospital (payer bill amount) for both time periods.

    For the two financial year s between 19/06/07 to 31/03/09

    The package rate for this duration was Rs2900 and out of 34 patients the

    average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs7425.26.

    56

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    57/172

    Thus the hospital had to borne RS 4525.26 more i.e. the lost suffered by

    hospital was Rs4525.26.

    For the two financial year s between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11

    The package rate for this duration was Rs4500 and out of 53 patients the

    average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs4770.26.

    Thus the hospital had to borne RS 270.26 more i.e. the lost suffered by

    hospital was Rs270.26.

    P rofitability analysis of the financial years.

    By plotting a graph loss borne by the hospital for the two durations it can be

    clearly understood that the hospital has reduced the loss by significant amount

    but still the loss is there.

    Analysis for Diagnostic hysteroscopy with D&C package

    Profitability analysis for all the patients

    57

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    58/172

    The analysis of all the patients who opted for, Hysteroscopy and D&C

    package for the time period between 19/06/07 to 31/03/11 was done and

    it was found that for the time period between 19/06/07 to 31/03/09 the package rate was Rs5200 and the minimum payer bill amount was

    Rs5801 and maximum was Rs9897 and for the time period between

    01/04/09 to 31/03/11 the package rate was Rs7200. And the minimum

    payer bill amount was Rs2404 and maximum was Rs9318. The graph

    clearly shows the difference between the package rate and cost to the

    hospital (payer bill amount) for both time periods.

    For the two financial year s between 19/06/07 to 31/03/09

    The package rate for this duration was Rs5200 and out of 92 patients the

    average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs7637.84.

    Thus the hospital had to borne RS 2437.84 more i.e. the lost suffered by

    hospital was Rs2437.84.

    For the two financial year s between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11

    The package rate for this duration was Rs7200 and out of 753 patients

    the average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs7332.33.

    58

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    59/172

    Thus the hospital had to borne RS 132.33 more i.e. the lost suffered by

    hospital was Rs132.33.

    P rofitability analysis of the financial years.

    By plotting a graph loss borne by the hospital for the two durations it can be

    clearly understood that the hospital has reduced the loss by significant amount

    but still the loss is there.

    Analysis for MTP package

    Profitability analysis for all the patients

    The analysis of all the patients who opted for MTP package for the time

    period between 19/06/07 to 31/03/11 was done and it was found that for

    the time period between 19/06/07 to 31/03/09 the package rate was

    Rs7000 and the minimum payer bill amount was Rs8870 and maximum

    was Rs16826 and for the time period between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11 the

    package rate was Rs9000. And the minimum payer bill amount was

    Rs5613 and maximum was Rs11592. The graph clearly shows the

    difference between the package rate and cost to the hospital (payer bill

    amount) for both time periods.

    59

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    60/172

    For the two financial year s between 18 /06/07 to 31/03/09

    The package rate for this duration was Rs4000 and out of 374 patients

    the average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs8759.33.

    Thus the hospital had to borne RS 4759.33 more i.e. the lost suffered by

    hospital was Rs4759.33.

    For the two financial year s between 01/04/09 to 31/03/11

    The package rate for this duration was Rs5800 and out of 468 patients

    the average cost to hospital per patient for this duration was Rs6107.77.Thus the hospital had to borne Rs 307.77 more i.e. the lost suffered by

    hospital was Rs307.77.

    P rofitability analysis of the financial years.

    By plotting a graph loss borne by the hospital for the two durations it can be

    clearly understood that the hospital has reduced the loss by significant amount

    but still the loss is there.

    60

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    61/172

    Recommendations

    On analyzing the data the following recommendations can be given

    Though the amount of loss has been significantly reduced still the package cost is

    less than the cost borne by the hospital. Thus the cost of the packages can be

    increased by comparing the cost of such packages with other hospitals.

    There is a fixed cost up to which the use of medical consumables is allowed to be

    used in a package. But in order to provide better care sometimes this limit is crossed,

    thus increasing the cost born by the hospital. Thus this limit should be made

    mandatory to be followed.

    Timely monitoring of market is very important so that the charges of these packages

    can be mapped up with the inflation. Specially those packages which are frequently

    consumed

    Timely monitoring should be done so that such loses are not missed again.

    61

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    62/172

    Conclusion

    Sir Gangaram hospital has various gynecological packages for its patients available at

    various fixed charges. These charges were fixed after consultation with surgeons and thefinance department. Over the period of time the market price of the medical consumables

    and medicines kept on increasing but charges of the packages were not changed

    accordingly. When speed miner was introduced and data mining was done to analyze the

    gynecological packages it was found that the hospital was suffering a great amount of loss.

    With the help of speed miner for the first time, hospital was able to see clearly what its

    actual expenditure within each package was, where it was losing money. By fine-tuning the

    packages hospital was able to cut its losses and at the same time hospital was able to make

    them more competitive and attractive to patients.

    The purpose of this study was to do a profitability analysis of the gynecological packages

    using Speedminer and then providing recommendations to improve the scenario. The

    extraction of data becomes very easy by using a data mining tool. Data mining tools allow

    on-the-fly data analysis. One simply selects the criteria to be studied and the data are

    updated immediately. One can add more criteria and the data are updated each time. The

    data mining gives a chance or opportunity to enhance the future performance of the business

    organization. If these predictions are done with the help and assistance of the historical

    information (data), then one can get sufficient data for improvising the products of the

    business organization.

    62

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    63/172

    Thus in order to improvise the gynecological packages Speedminer was used. The data

    extracted using Speedminer shows a considerable amount of loss in the first two financial

    years and a reduction in loss in the subsequent years. Though significantly reduced, loss is

    still there, thus a few recommendations have been given. The implementation of any of the

    above recommendation would ensure profit in gynecological packages, a disciplined

    monitoring of the market and a better use of data mining tools.

    References

    Microsoft Excel Data Analysis and Business Modeling by Wayne L.

    Winston

    Facilities planning and management by G. D. KUNDERS.

    Implementing an Advanced Hospital Pharmacy Information System

    by Dr. Karanvir Singh.

    Pharmacy management: essentials for all practice settings By Shane

    P. Desselle, David P. Zgarrick.

    Data mining and business intelligence in a hospital setting by DrKaranvir Singh.

    Counting on Data - Dr Sanjeev Sood.

    U.S. National Library of Medicine.

    63

    http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CDsQFjAF&url=http://www.ehealthonline.org/articles/article-details.asp?Title=Counting%20on%20Data&ArticalID=2433&Type=APPLICATIONS&ei=-QniTYQIjdSAB_G02MIG&usg=AFQjCNEDr1gqDzruyds8212sqHRzAgtdQghttp://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CDsQFjAF&url=http://www.ehealthonline.org/articles/article-details.asp?Title=Counting%20on%20Data&ArticalID=2433&Type=APPLICATIONS&ei=-QniTYQIjdSAB_G02MIG&usg=AFQjCNEDr1gqDzruyds8212sqHRzAgtdQghttp://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CDsQFjAF&url=http://www.ehealthonline.org/articles/article-details.asp?Title=Counting%20on%20Data&ArticalID=2433&Type=APPLICATIONS&ei=-QniTYQIjdSAB_G02MIG&usg=AFQjCNEDr1gqDzruyds8212sqHRzAgtdQg
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    64/172

    Accounting Terms Dictionary.

    Khan, M.Y.; & Jain, P.K.; Theory and Problems in FinancialManagement.

    Accounting Tools by Steven Bragg.

    Charles Atkinson by Safety Stock.

    White paper on re-order level by Richard D Henshell.

    Oracle Reorder Point and Min-max Planning: Based on Outdated

    Concepts? Dr. Volker Thormhlen

    Simulation-Optimization for Business Decision

    Support in a Global Specialty Chemicals

    Enterprise by Jia Hui Tana, AriefAdhityab,

    Rajagopalan Srinivasana,b, b.

    Designing and managing the supply chain: by

    David Simchi-Levi, Philip Kaminsky, Edith

    Simchi-Levi

    64

    http://www.businesstermsdictionary.com/accounting/http://www.accountingtools.com/about-accountingtools/http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&sa=N&biw=1345&bih=592&q=inauthor:%22David+Simchi-Levi%22&ei=Zf3tTZ3eM4fh0QGK-YyGCA&ved=0CBsQ9Ag4Cghttp://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&sa=N&biw=1345&bih=592&q=inauthor:%22Philip+Kaminsky%22&ei=Zf3tTZ3eM4fh0QGK-YyGCA&ved=0CBwQ9Ag4Cghttp://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&sa=N&biw=1345&bih=592&q=inauthor:%22Edith+Simchi-Levi%22&ei=Zf3tTZ3eM4fh0QGK-YyGCA&ved=0CB0Q9Ag4Cghttp://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&sa=N&biw=1345&bih=592&q=inauthor:%22Edith+Simchi-Levi%22&ei=Zf3tTZ3eM4fh0QGK-YyGCA&ved=0CB0Q9Ag4Cghttp://www.businesstermsdictionary.com/accounting/http://www.accountingtools.com/about-accountingtools/http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&sa=N&biw=1345&bih=592&q=inauthor:%22David+Simchi-Levi%22&ei=Zf3tTZ3eM4fh0QGK-YyGCA&ved=0CBsQ9Ag4Cghttp://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&sa=N&biw=1345&bih=592&q=inauthor:%22Philip+Kaminsky%22&ei=Zf3tTZ3eM4fh0QGK-YyGCA&ved=0CBwQ9Ag4Cghttp://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&sa=N&biw=1345&bih=592&q=inauthor:%22Edith+Simchi-Levi%22&ei=Zf3tTZ3eM4fh0QGK-YyGCA&ved=0CB0Q9Ag4Cghttp://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&sa=N&biw=1345&bih=592&q=inauthor:%22Edith+Simchi-Levi%22&ei=Zf3tTZ3eM4fh0QGK-YyGCA&ved=0CB0Q9Ag4Cg
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    65/172

    Barron's Accounting Dictionary.

    Explicit formulas for the order size and reorder

    point in certain inventory problems by

    Chandrasekhar Das.

    Clifton, Christopher (2010). "Encyclopedia

    Britannica: Definition of Data Mining.

    Annexure A

    Generic Form UOM

    Daily

    qtyRO

    LPipeline

    ROQ

    Indent

    AceclofenacCapsule

    100mg

    40.12

    1,003 0

    816 100

    Capsule

    200mg

    11.11

    256 0

    222 100

    AcenocoumarolCapsule 1 mg

    10.56

    285 0

    344 200

    Capsule 2 mg

    15.56

    420 0

    554 300

    Capsule 3 mg

    5.56

    150 0

    134

    -200

    Caps

    ule 4 mg

    5.6

    7

    15

    3 0

    23

    8 200Acyclovir

    Ampoules

    250mg

    7.77

    179 200 95 200

    Capsule

    200mg

    3.33 63 0 -37 0

    65

    http://www.answers.com/library/Accounting%20Dictionary-cid-10087960http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1056150/data-mininghttp://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1056150/data-mininghttp://www.answers.com/library/Accounting%20Dictionary-cid-10087960http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1056150/data-mininghttp://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1056150/data-mining
  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    66/172

    Capsule

    400mg

    6.11

    165 0

    207 100

    Capsule

    800mg

    8.62

    181 300

    -440 0

    Tube 5%0.3

    7 9 0 -37 0

    Albendazole

    Bottle

    200mg/5ml

    1.72 46 50 -63

    Capsule

    400mg

    20.55

    514 400

    -128 300

    Alendronate SodiumCapsule

    150mg

    0.22 5 0 -7

    Capsule 35 mg

    3.55 96 0

    149 80

    Capsule 70 mg

    1.33 36 0 56 40

    Alfacalcidol

    Capsule

    698.92

    13,279

    13000

    10,763

    8000

    Capsule

    0.25mcg

    56.52

    1,526 0

    944 400

    Capsule 1 mcg

    2.22 60 0 93 100

    AlfuzosinCapsule 10 mg

    23.89

    549 10

    708 400

    AllopurinolCaps

    ule

    100

    mg

    62.

    22

    1,6

    80

    100

    0

    1,6

    13

    200

    0Aminophylline + Theophylline+

    Ampoules 2 ml

    19.45

    525 0

    717 500

    Capsule

    2.22 60 0

    -307

    Capsule

    150mg

    118.89

    3,210 0

    4,993

    3500

    Capsule

    300mg

    27.78

    750 0

    1,167

    1000

    Amiodarone

    Ampoules

    150

    mg/3ml

    24.53

    613 400 -79 100

    Capsule

    100mg

    19.22

    519 400

    207 400

    Capsule

    200mg

    41.11

    946

    1000

    362

    1200

    66

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    67/172

    AmlodipineCapsule 10 mg 20

    540 0

    240

    Capsule

    2.5000mg

    32.56

    879

    1100

    268

    1200

    Capsule 5 mg

    222.06

    5,996 10

    2,927 600

    Amlodipine + Atenolol CombinationsCapsule 50 mg

    159.89

    4,317 0

    4,255

    2000

    Amoxycillin

    Bottle

    125mg/5ml

    0.17 5 0 7 10

    Bottle 60 ml 0.5 12 0 -26

    Capsule

    250mg 11

    282 0

    -243

    Caps

    ule

    500

    mg

    17.

    94

    48

    4 0

    31

    8 500

    50

    0

    Amoxycillin + Clavulanic AcidAmpoules 1.2 g

    32.25

    716 0

    452 300

    Bottle200mg

    0.22 5 0 8 0

    Bottle

    200mg+28.5mg

    3.97

    107 0

    107 0

    Capsule

    1000mg

    83.68

    1,813 0

    820 500

    Capsule

    375mg

    10.18

    224 44

    155 200

    Capsule

    625mg

    175.35

    3,858 84

    1,735 700

    Syrup

    200mg+28.5mg

    0.66 18 0 -25 30

    Amoxycillin + Cloxacillin

    Capsule 2.3 62 400

    -303 60

    Amphotericin-B( Conventional )

    Ampoules 50 mg

    2.67 54 0 -86 10

    Ampicillin + CloxacillinCapsule

    500mg

    1.78 48 0 75 100

    Ampicillin + SulbactamSodium

    Ampo 1.50 g 1.5 42 0 66 50

    67

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    68/172

    ules 6

    Capsule

    375mg

    2.89 78 0

    -129

    Antacid Preparations

    BottleCOMMON

    10.94

    295 500

    -

    101 300

    Tube 200 ml0.9

    4 25 0 39 40Anti-haemorrhoidPreparations

    Tube0.9

    4 25 25 -31 10

    Antioxidants

    Bottle 100 ml0.0

    3 1 0 -5

    Capsule NA

    11.67

    315 300

    -140 300

    Antitussives

    Bottle 100 ml0.2

    2 5 0 8 10

    Bottle

    30mg/5ml

    0.44 12 0 -20 0

    Drops 15 ml 0.5 14 0 -54 0

    Syrup 60 ml4.6

    1106 0

    145 10

    ArtesunateAmpoules 60 mg

    1.88 51 46 29 70

    Aspirin (Low Dose)

    Capsule

    150mg

    132.48

    3,577 0

    5,225

    3100

    Capsule

    325mg

    1.87 50 0

    -5,115

    Capsule 75 mg

    191.39

    5,168 0

    7,181

    4600

    AtorvastatinCapsule 10 mg

    139.55

    2,651

    4000

    245

    Capsule 20 mg

    118.89

    2,259

    4100 -58

    Capsule 40 mg

    63.33

    1,372

    1500

    822

    2200

    Capsule 5 mg

    34.34

    790 0

    770

    1000

    Atorvastatin + EzetimibeCapsule 10 mg 35

    805 0

    730 100

    Caps 20 mg 7.3 19 0 -

    68

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    69/172

    ule 3 8432

    AtracuriumAmpoules 25 mg

    54.22

    1,030 0

    1,493

    Ampoules 50 mg

    1.11 21 0 -10

    Vial

    100mg/10ml

    1.29 35 0 19

    1300

    AzithromycinAmpoules

    500mg

    0.27 6 6 4 15

    Bottle

    100mg/5ml

    0.17 5 0 -13 0

    Bottle

    200mg/5ml

    0.53 14 0 22 10

    Capsule

    250mg

    0.69 16 0 -12 0

    Capsule

    500mg

    36.13

    831 180

    905 500

    AztreonamAmpoules 0.5 g

    0.83 16 0 28 60

    Ampoules 1 g

    0.98 19 0 25 0

    Ampoules

    500mg

    0.63 13 0 -7 0

    Vial 1 g0.6

    1 12 25 -19 50

    Vial 2 g0.1

    3 2 0 -2 0

    Baclofen Capsule 25 mg

    6.67

    180 0

    280 200

    BetamethasoneCapsule 0.5 mg

    2.44 66 0 22 100

    Tube 0.05%1.1

    8 32 0 44

    Tube 5 g1.6

    1 43 0 -62

    Betamethasone Combinations

    Tube1.8

    9 51 30 25 40

    Tube 10 g

    0.0

    3 1 0 -6Bleomycin

    Ampoules 15 mg

    0.17 4 0 6 10

    Blood set

    69

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    70/172

    PieceCOMMON

    39.44

    1,065

    1300

    356

    1300

    BortezomibAmpoules

    0.01 0 0 0

    Vial 1 mg0.3

    9 9 0 4 20

    Budesonide InhalersAmpoules 0.5 mg

    178.34

    4,459

    1000

    4,214

    2000

    Piece9.5

    6258 0

    248 200

    Piece100mcg

    0.06 2 0 -13 0

    Piece200mcg

    0.13 4 0 -26 0

    BupivacaineAmpoules 0.25% 3.4 92 200 -57 200Ampo

    ules 0.50%

    13.

    89

    37

    5 0

    58

    3 400Ampoules 20 ml

    13.43

    363 300

    244 300

    CalcitoninAmpoules 100 IU

    3.56 68 50 21 100

    Bottle0.1

    7 3 0 1 5

    Calcium

    Ampoules 10%

    50.85

    1,237 0

    -1,428

    Bottle0.1

    7 5 0 -3

    Bottle250mg

    2.42 65 0 50 30

    Capsule

    30.39

    821 0

    1,276

    Capsule

    1000mg

    93.56

    2,526 0

    3,430

    2500

    Capsule

    250mg 78

    1,950 0

    -2,080

    Capsule

    500mg

    951.78

    24,429

    20000

    18,706

    25000

    Capsule

    625mg

    46.67

    1,073 0

    -127

    Capsule

    COMMON

    3.33 77 0

    -1,273

    Capsule NA

    2.78 64 0

    -1,474

    70

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    71/172

    Syrup 200 ml0.1

    7 4 0 6 10

    CarbamazepineCapsule

    100mg

    8.89

    240 0 73

    Capsule

    200mg

    20.21

    530 0

    833 400

    100

    Cardioplegia

    Bottle0.5

    6 15 25 -1 30

    CarvedilolCapsule

    12.500mg

    6.67

    180 200 80 300

    Capsule

    3.125mg

    16.11

    435 0

    -223 0

    Capsule

    6.250mg

    5.56

    150 0

    -216 0

    Cefixime

    Bottle

    100mg/5ml

    0.11 3 0 -5

    Bottle 50 mg0.1

    1 3 0 4Capsule

    100mg

    7.38

    180 0 54

    Capsule

    200mg

    54.24

    1,356

    3780

    -2,630

    1300

    Capsule

    400mg

    1.22 33 0 -39

    Cefpodoxime

    Bottle

    100mg/5ml 0.4 8 0 14 10

    Capsule

    100mg

    -0.6

    7 -18 0 -28 10

    Capsule

    200mg

    37.85

    901

    1360

    -771 300

    Ceftazidime

    Ampoules 1 g

    14.22

    270 590

    -207 350

    Ampo

    ules 2 g

    1.8

    3 35 40 -10Ceftriaxone

    Ampoules 1 g

    40.95

    1,024 600

    218 500

    Ampoules 2 g

    15.39

    385 0

    366 800

    71

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    72/172

    Vial13.84

    318 450 72

    Ceftriaxone + TazobactamAmpoules 1 g 0.6 14 0 23 50

    Vial1.0

    1 25 0 40

    Cefuroxime + Clavulanic acid

    Capsule

    250mg 1 23 210

    -172 100

    Capsule

    500mg

    13.67

    314 90

    399 600

    Cetirizine

    Bottle

    5mg/5ml

    2.19 56 0 -41 0

    Capsule 10 mg

    148.33

    4,005 0

    5,130

    3500

    Chlordiazepoxide

    Capsule 10 mg

    16.67

    450 600

    100 400

    CinnarizineCapsule 25 mg

    5.55

    139 0

    222

    Capsule 75 mg

    1.11 30 0 37 200

    Ciprofloxacin

    Bottle200mg

    3.87

    104 81 82 130

    Capsule

    500mg

    58.55

    1,347 0

    1,585

    1000

    Ciprofloxacin (Eye/Ear Drops)

    Bottle 0.30%7.4

    8202 200 49 200

    CisplatinAmpoules 10 mg

    0.89 19 0 22 10

    Ampoules

    10mg/10ml

    0.22 6 0 9

    Ampoules 50 mg

    0.33 7 0 7 5

    CiticolineAmpoules 4 ml

    17.31

    398 0 98

    Capsule

    500mg 30

    630 0

    680 500

    2

    00

    ClarithromycinAmpoules

    500mg

    1.88 36 0 -41 0

    Caps 250 5.6 10 12 13 200

    72

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    73/172

    ule mg 6 8Capsule

    500mg

    12.06

    229 0

    270 500

    ClindamycinAmpoules

    150mg/ml

    169.22

    3,215

    4600

    663

    Ampoules

    600mg 2 50 0 10

    Capsule

    150mg

    8.89

    169 0

    202

    Capsule

    300mg

    83.22

    1,581 0

    2,229

    50000

    ClonazepamCapsule

    0.25mg

    32.89

    888

    1400 -19

    1000

    Capsule 0.5 mg

    12.22

    330 0

    -787

    Capsule 1 mg

    1.11 30 0 -53

    ClotrimazoleCapsule

    100mg

    58.34

    1,575 0

    2,330 300

    Piece 1%1.8

    2 49 50 11 50

    Tube 0.8 22 0 -27

    Tube10mg/g

    6.51

    176 0

    103 100

    TubeCOMMON

    3.56 96 120 30 70

    CycloserineCapsule

    250mg

    2.16 58 0 -59

    1000

    Cyproheptadine

    Bottle

    2mg/5ml

    0.17 5 10 -3 10

    DacarbazineAmpoules

    200mg

    0.33 7 0 12 5

    DanazolCapsule

    100mg

    1.11 21 0 8 30

    Dexamethasone

    Ampo

    ules

    4

    mg/ml

    46.

    64

    1,2

    59

    210

    0

    -29

    1

    100

    0

    Capsule 0.5 mg

    12.22

    330 0

    -287

    DiaperPacket of

    Adult 4 92 120 -6 110

    73

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    74/172

    10Packet of 5 Paed

    19.92

    458 200

    557 600

    Piece3.1

    1 84 0131

    Diazepam

    Ampoules

    10mg/2ml

    0.02 1 0 1 0

    Capsule 2 mg

    0.11 3 0 -85 0

    Capsule 5 mg

    4.44

    120 200 -14 200

    Diclofenac SodiumAmpoules

    25mg/ml

    198.5

    5,360 0

    2,437 500

    Capsule

    100mg

    36.22

    978 0

    1,176 375

    Capsule 50 mg

    69.55

    1,739 100

    2,567

    2000

    Capsule 75 mg 50.22 1,356 0 2,009 1500

    TubeCOMMON

    39.48

    1,066 0

    1,082

    Diclofenac Topical

    BottleCOMMON

    5.92

    148 0

    191

    Piece100mg

    4.16 96 124 34

    Tube0.5

    6 15 50 -26 500

    DigoxinAmpoules 0.5 mg

    0.56 15 0 -56

    Capsule

    0.25mg

    24.44

    660 0

    1,026 700

    DiltiazemAmpoules

    5mg/ml

    0.07 2 0 3

    Capsule

    120mg

    11.11

    300 0

    367 200

    Capsule

    180mg

    2.22 60 0 -7

    Capsule 30 mg

    58.33

    1,575 0

    350 500

    Capsule 60 mg

    11.11

    300 0

    167

    Caps

    ule 90 mg

    21.

    67

    58

    5 0

    41

    0Disodium Hydrogen Citrate

    Bottle1.53g/5ml

    0.88 24 0 27 20

    Sachets 4 g

    5.02

    136 0 -21 0

    74

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    75/172

    DobutamineAmpoules

    250mg

    3.28 62 0 42 60

    DoxophyllineAmpoules 10 ml

    0.22 5 0 -42

    Capsule

    400mg

    99.61

    2,689 10

    2,344

    1200

    DoxycyclineCapsule

    100mg

    82.11

    2,217 0

    849 600

    DrotaverineAmpoules 20 mg 10

    230 0

    182 200

    Ampoules

    20mg/ml

    4.33

    117 0

    182

    Capsule 40 mg

    5.55

    139 0

    222 200

    Capsule 80 mg

    7.11

    182 0

    289 200

    DutasterideCapsule 0.5 mg

    3.33 90 120 20 100

    DydrogesteroneCapsule 10 mg

    26.67

    720 700

    420

    1000

    Enalapril

    Ampoules

    1.250mg

    -0.0

    6 -1 0 -2Capsule

    1.11 30 0 47 100

    Caps

    ule 10 mg 6.5

    17

    6 0

    27

    3 150

    Capsule

    2.5000mg

    7.67

    207 500

    -763

    Capsule 5 mg

    29.72

    802 10

    553 800

    EntecavirCapsule 0.5 mg

    5.33

    101 0

    151 120

    EpirubicinAmpoules 10 mg

    0.56 13 20 1 20

    Ampoules 50 mg

    1.06 29 20 25 30

    ErlotinibCapsule

    100mg

    1.33 25 0 45 60

    Capsule

    150mg 1 23 0 38 30

    Ertapenem

    75

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    76/172

    Ampoules 1 g

    2.81 53 12 26 40

    Erythromycin

    Capsule

    250mg

    0.67 18 0

    -162

    Capsule

    500mg

    1.56 42 0 36 100

    ErythropoietinAmpoules 0.3 6 0 8Ampoules

    2000IU/ml

    0.13 2 0 -2

    Ampoules

    3000IU

    0.53 10 0 6

    Ampoules

    4000IU/ml

    3.05 70 46 60 36

    Esomeprazole

    Ampoules 40 mg 12.28 332 0

    -16,

    904 300Capsule 20 mg

    10.11

    273 25 95

    Capsule 40 mg

    24.48

    661 944 84 700

    Esomeprazole + DomperidoneCapsule 40 mg

    11.11

    300 300

    167 400

    EthambutolCapsule 1 g

    35.56

    960

    1000

    494

    1200

    Capsule

    200mg

    8.89

    240 200

    173 400

    Generic UOM

    Dailyqty

    ROL

    Pipeline

    ROQ

    Capsule

    400mg

    15.56

    420 300

    354 400

    Capsule

    600mg

    20.67

    558 600

    268 600

    Capsule

    800mg

    67.89

    1,833

    2200

    651

    2300

    EtoricoxibCapsule

    120mg

    8.89

    240 0

    373 300

    Capsule 60 mg

    18.89

    510 0

    793 400

    Capsule 90 mg

    21.55

    582 0

    845 700

    Expectorant Preparations

    Bottle 0.5 14 0 -94 0

    76

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    77/172

    BottleCOMMON 3.2 86 50 52 70

    FenofibrateCapsule

    4.44

    120 0 -14

    Capsule

    160mg

    4.44

    120 100 86 100

    Capsule

    200mg 10

    270 400 20 300

    Flavoxate

    Capsule

    200mg

    2.22 60 200

    -107 100

    Foley

    Piece1.7

    7 48 0 16

    PieceCOMMON

    30.39

    821 110

    1,116

    FollitrophinAmpo

    ules 150 IU

    1.5

    6 36 50 9 50Ampoules

    300mg

    0.38 7 0 4 10

    Ampoules

    600mg

    0.28 5 0 1 10

    Ampoules 75 IU

    1.39 32 50 3 50

    FrusemideAmpoules 20 mg

    103.89

    2,805 0

    4,363

    3000

    Capsule 40 mg

    46.44

    1,254

    1040 -50 500

    GabapentinCapsule

    100mg

    71.11

    1,920 0

    1,387 500

    Capsule

    300mg

    21.38

    577 0

    698 700

    Capsule

    400mg

    2.22 60 0 -67

    GefitinibCapsule

    250mg 1 23 0 -22 25

    Gentamicin

    Ampoules 20 mg

    -0.3

    8 -10 0

    -555

    Ampo

    ules 80 mg

    25.

    8

    69

    7 0

    66

    4 800

    Vial17.52

    473 9

    118

    Gonadotrophin F.S.HAmpoules 300 IU

    1.83 35 0 57 50

    77

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    78/172

    Ampoules 75 IU

    0.22 6 0 9 25

    Ampoules 900 IU

    1.42 27 0 43 30

    Kit 150 IU3.8

    9 74 0 -43

    Kit 75 IU

    0.8

    3 16 0 28 10

    HeparinAmpoules

    10IU/ml

    190.05

    5,131 0

    4,532 0

    Ampoules

    25000IU

    18.9

    510 120

    525 600

    Ampoules

    5000IU

    105.6

    2,640 0

    3,024

    2000

    Hydrocortisone SuccinateAmpoules

    100mg

    66.22

    1,656 0

    1,369 800

    Hydroxypropyl MethylCellulose

    Ampoules 16

    432 0

    672 540

    Bottle14.81

    400 0

    487

    Bottle 0.30%0.8

    9 24 0 -5

    Bottle 0.50%0.0

    4 1 0 2 30

    Hyoscine Butyl BromideAmpoules

    20mg/ml

    33.33

    900 600

    800 800

    Capsule 10 mg

    8.89

    240 0

    353 200

    Suppositor

    y

    12.

    61

    34

    0 0

    36

    0 200

    Ibuprofen + Paracetamol

    Bottle 100 ml3.1

    7 86 0 -13

    Capsule

    400mg

    555.95

    15,011 0

    16,960

    11000

    Insulin aspart + protamineAmpoules

    100IU/ml

    0.22 4 0 2 5

    Insulin BiphasicAmpoules

    8.76

    166 0

    184

    Ampoules

    100IU/ml

    0.36 10 0 7 10

    Ampoules

    40IU/ml

    2.67 51 0 41 40

    Cartridge

    100IU/ml

    3.02 57 0 45 10

    78

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    79/172

    Insulin GlargineAmpoules

    100IU/ml

    0.41 8 0 1

    Ampoules 3 ml

    3.23 61 100 9 100

    Cartridge 300 IU

    0.22 5 0 8 10

    INSULIN GLULISINEAmpoules 300 IU

    0.54 10 10 3 10

    Insulin NeutralAmpoules

    40IU/ml

    10.67

    203 0

    243 150

    Cartridge

    100IU/ml

    0.44 8 0 10 20

    IrinotecanAmpoules

    100mg 0.3 7 5 4 6

    Iron Formulations

    Bottle COMMON 3.22 87 70 55 100

    Capsule

    14.33

    387 600

    -148

    Capsule

    100mg

    37.22

    856 0

    1,414

    1000

    Capsule

    COMMON

    260.72

    7,039

    2100

    8,750

    1000

    Isosorbide-5-Mononitrate

    Capsule 10 mg

    11.39

    308 0

    -1,237

    Capsule 20 mg

    25.88

    699 0

    687 300

    Capsule 30 mg

    1.78 48 0 75

    Lactulose

    Bottle10g/15ml

    22.45

    606 0

    923 700

    LansoprazoleCapsule 15 mg

    11.12

    278 300

    145 200

    Capsule 30 mg 5.5

    127 0 -1 100

    LercanidipineCapsule 10 mg

    29.44

    795 0

    536 300

    Capsule 20 mg 16

    432 0

    272

    Letrozole

    Capsule

    2.67 51 0

    -239

    79

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    80/172

    LeucovorinAmpoules 15 mg

    2.11 49 0 -70 0

    Ampoules 50 mg

    3.56 82 40 85 120

    Capsule 15 mg

    0.67 13 0

    -117 0

    Leuprolide

    Ampoules

    -0.0

    1 0 0 -3Ampoules

    3.7500mg

    0.04 1 0 -2

    Ampoules 4 mg

    0.94 18 0 2 10

    LevamisoleCapsule

    400mg

    1.11 21 100 -62 100

    Caps

    ule

    800

    mg

    0.8

    9 17 100 -90 100Levetiracetam

    Ampoules

    100mg

    9.47

    180 390 -68 300

    Capsule

    1000mg

    0.67 15 0 -15

    Capsule

    250mg

    16.66

    383 0

    143 200

    Capsule

    500mg

    37.78

    768 0

    935 200

    500

    LevocetirizineCapsule 5 mg

    195.55

    5,019 0

    3,952

    3000

    Levofloxacin

    Ampoules

    500mg/100ml

    1.56 30 0 8

    Bottle 10190 0 15

    Capsule

    500mg

    52.33

    994 100

    -176

    Capsule

    750mg

    21.34

    448 5

    443 600

    Levosalbutamol (Inhalers)

    Piece0.31mg

    7.33

    198 0 48

    Piece0.63mg

    16.44

    444 0

    430 200

    Piece1.250mg

    7.11

    192 0

    299 300

    Piece50mcg

    0.09 2 0 -18

    80

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    81/172

    LignocaineAmpoules

    12.44

    336 0

    422

    Ampoules 2%

    27.92

    754 0

    726 700

    Ampoules 30 mg

    14.11

    381 0

    583

    Ampoules 4%

    2.28 62 0 96 200

    Ampoules

    COMMON

    2.57 69 0 40

    Bottle

    10%,10%,10%

    0.74 20 0 18 30

    Bottle 100 ml0.6

    9 16 20 6

    Tube 2% 541,458 0

    608 200

    LoratadineCapsule 10 mg

    28.67

    736 900

    266 800

    Losartan PotassiumCapsule 25 mg

    28.56

    771 0

    1,000 600

    Capsule 50 mg 57

    1,539 0

    2,154

    1200

    Losartan PotassiumCombinations

    Capsule 50 mg

    29.22

    789 0

    1,027 500

    Low Molecular Weight Heparins(LMWHs)

    Ampoules

    10000IU

    0.01 0 0 0 1

    Ampo

    ules 20 mg

    1.5

    6 30 50 -3 40Ampoules

    2500IU

    17.33

    329 500 59

    Ampoules 40 mg

    19.6

    372 0

    480 350

    Ampoules

    5000IU

    23.89

    454 0

    562 450

    Ampoules 60 mg

    8.87

    169 0

    192 150

    Ampoules

    7500IU

    0.33 6 0 6

    Ampoules 80 mg

    0.07 1 0 2 4

    Mebeverine

    Capsule

    135mg

    7.77

    210 200

    -174

    Capsule

    200mg

    1.67 38 0 33 100

    Medroxyprogesterone

    81

  • 8/6/2019 Analysis of Discrepancies Between Manual and Automated ROL of Drugs1

    82/172

    Ampoules

    150mg

    0.06 1 0 -2

    Capsule 10 mg 10

    270 0

    320 400

    MephentermineAmpoules

    30mg/ml

    2.33 63 60 38 60

    MeropenemAmpoules 1 g

    44.22

    840 540

    963

    1080

    Ampoules

    250mg

    1.63 31 14 -26

    Ampoules

    500mg

    45.89

    872 540

    896

    3000

    MetforminCapsule

    1000mg

    124.44

    2,862

    3000

    1,729

    3500

    Caps

    ule

    500

    mg

    187

    .34

    4,4

    96

    600

    0

    1,1

    16

    300

    0

    240

    0Metformin + Gliclazide

    Capsule

    5.56

    150 0

    234 300

    Capsule

    500mg

    5.56

    128 0

    211 300

    Capsule 80 mg

    77.33

    2,088

    3300

    -112

    2000

    Metformin + GlimepirideCapsule 1 mg

    12.56

    289 0

    207 200

    Capsule 2 mg

    36.56

    841 0

    1,179

    1000

    Metformin + PioglitazoneCapsule 15 mg

    5.22

    141 50 -21

    Capsule 30 mg

    3.33 90 100 40 100

    Metformin + Pioglitazone + GlimeprideCapsule 1 mg

    8.23

    222 0

    246 300

    Capsule 2 m


Recommended