+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra...

Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra...

Date post: 02-Apr-2015
Category:
Upload: akira-freeby
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
40
Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst
Transcript
Page 1: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

Analysis of Patient Treatment ProceduresThe BPI Challenge Case Study

R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose

Wil M.P. van der Aalst

Page 2: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

The Challenge

• provides participants with a real-life event log• analyze this data using whatever techniques

available• can focus on a specific aspect of interest and

analyze this aspect in great detail• may report on a broader range of aspects

• each aspect does not have to be developed in full detail• judged on its completeness of analysis

• use any tools, techniques, methods at your disposal• techniques developed or implemented specifically

for this challenge are welcome!!

Page 3: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

The Event Log

• taken from a Dutch Academic Hospital• each case is a patient of a Gynaecology department• many attributes have been recorded that are relevant

to the process

Page 4: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

The Event Log

• taken from a Dutch Academic Hospital• each case is a patient of a Gynaecology department• many attributes have been recorded that are relevant

to the process

Page 5: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Heuristic Net

Page 6: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Overview of our approach

preprocess(filtering/splitting

of event log)

analyze(enhanced fuzzy

mining and trace alignment)

interpret

Page 7: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Overview of our approach

preprocess(filtering/splitting

of event log)

analyze(enhanced fuzzy

mining and trace alignment)

interpret

Page 8: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Dissecting the event log

Page 9: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

The Diagnosis Perspective

M11, M12, M13, etc.

Plaveiselcelca_ cervix st IIb,Clearcell ca. ovarium st Ia ,Adenoca: corpus uteri st IVa

Page 10: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

The Diagnosis Perspective

Page 11: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

The Diagnosis Perspective

FIGO Staging Classifications and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gynaecological CancersJ.L. Benedet, H. Hender, H. Jones 3rd, H.Y. Ngan and S. PecorelliInternational Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (2009) 70(2), 209-262

“Ninety percent of cancers are squamous in origin, while melanomas, adenocarcinomas, basal cell carcinomas, …, and other malignancies also occur”

http://www.figo.org

Page 12: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

The Diagnosis Perspective

Page 13: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Heterogeneity of cases

Page 14: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

1. R.P.J.C. Bose and W.M.P. van der Aalst, Context Aware Trace Clustering: Towards Improving Process Mining Results, SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), 2009 pp 401-412.

2. R.P.J.C. Bose and W.M.P. van der Aalst, Trace Clustering Based on Conserved Patterns: Towards Achieving Better Process Models, BPM Workshops 2009, vol 43 of LNBIP, pp 170-181

Page 15: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Grouping homogenous cases-The Diagnosis Perspective

Page 16: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

The Treatment Perspective

Page 17: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Organizational Perspective to Derive Artifacts

Page 18: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

The Time Perspective (1)

Page 19: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

The Time Perspective (2)

Page 20: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Urgent vs. Non-urgent Cases

• haemoglobin photoelectric• haemoglobin photoelectric-urgent• platelet count • platelet count-urgent

Page 21: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Preprocessing-Summary

• Five perspectives• Diagnosis• Treatment• Organizational• Time• Urgent and non-urgent

Page 22: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

preprocess(filtering/splitting

of event log)

analyze(enhanced fuzzy

mining and trace alignment)

interpret

Page 23: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

Control-flow Discovery

Page 24: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Workflow of Treatment Procedures on Patients Diagnosed for M11

• Raw Event Loga. Select cases whose diagnosis code combination is

{M11} – 162 cases, 207 event classes, 11.280 events

b. Segregate cases from (a) into urgent and non-urgent cases

− 137 non-urgent cases, 143 event classes, 6.225 events− 25 urgent cases, 173 event classes, 5.055 events

c. Transform the logs based on the notion of artifacts− 136 non-urgent cases, 21 event classes, 1.561 events− 25 urgent cases, 18 event classes, 1.118 events

Page 25: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Workflow for non-urgent cases

General Lab Clinical Chemistry

Radiology

Pathology

Page 26: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Non-urgent cases - Pathology

Page 27: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Non-urgent cases - Radiology

Page 28: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Non-urgent cases- GLCC

Page 29: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Non-urgent cases –GLCC, Blood Count Tests

Page 30: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Urgent Cases

Page 31: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Urgent Cases - GLCC

Page 32: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

Process Diagnostics

Page 33: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Patients Diagnosed with M13

• Raw Event Log• Select cases whose diagnostic code combination is

{M13} - 252 cases, 272 event classes, 14.611 events• Select cases who have been administered with

treatment code combination {803} – 23 cases, 135 event classes, 3.329 events

• Segregate urgent and non-urgent cases− 15 non-urgent cases, 110 event classes, 1.961 events− 8 urgent cases, 94 event classes, 1.368 events

Page 34: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Non-urgent cases

Consensus sequence forms the backbone of

the process

Deviations, exceptional behavior, rare event executions are captured in regions that are

sparsely filled or in regions that are well conserved with a few rare gaps

Page 35: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Non-urgent cases e7 - SCC using EIA

a0: CEA - tumor marker using

MEIA

ABO blood group and Rhfactor (e4) Rh factor using centrifuge method (c3)

e8 - cephalin time-coagulation

test

Page 36: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Urgent Cases a0: CEA - tumor marker using

MEIA

Lots of activities skipped

Page 37: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Urgent Cases

Page 38: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Take Home Points

• Things may look complex/uninteresting unless looked from a right perspective

• Preprocessing is extremely important, but unfortunately often neglected

• Treatment procedures are rather simple and sequential• Cases share a lot in common with very little deviations

Beautiful woman,

wolves, tiger, eagle,

horse..

Page 39: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011

Reflections on the Challenge

• Open ended challenge• a boon as well as a disadvantage

• Real questions Real results• Objective evaluation

(No)(No)

Page 40: Analysis of Patient Treatment Procedures The BPI Challenge Case Study R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra ‘JC’ Bose Wil M.P. van der Aalst.

© R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose and Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011


Recommended