Analysis of Record for Calibration (AORC)
David Kitzmiller, Ziya Zhang, Wanru Wu, Nathan Patrick, Xuning Tan
Major contributions from Dennis Miller, Yuxiang He,Yu Zhang, James Ward, Xiaoshen Li, Xia Feng , Lubak Kassa,
Gustavo Valenzuela, Sanian Gaffar, Hank Herr
Office of Water PredictionNational Weather Service, NOAA
14 August 20181
Today’s Presentation
• Motivation for the project• Basic properties of the archive
– Inputs, outputs– Temporal/spatial coverage
• Statistical properties of temperature/precipitation relative to NLDAS-2
• Experiments in wind downscaling, satellite radiation blending
• Projects using AORC data• Updating system• Challenges for dissemination
2
Motivation
• Considerable effort involved in data assembly for hydrologic model re-calibration
• Many gridded meteorological inputs are already available
• Aim to produce a single source of meteorological data for basin-average precipitation and temperature, and grids for distributed models
3
AORC Properties (CONUS-region)
• Period of record 1979-near present• Coverage for superCONUS region:
– From Rio Conchos to Columbia basins– 23-53° N
• Final resolution 30” (match PRISM climatology grids)
• Includes all sensible weather elements• Temperature/precipitation constrained toward
1981-2010 climatology• NetCDF4 storage, some available in grib2
4
Climatology Input Grids:• Parameter Regression on Independent Slopes
Method (PRISM)– CONUS (publicly available)– British Columbia (Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium)– 30 arc-second grid mesh
• NCEI (formerly NCDC) – Vose et al:– North America, 17⁰ - 54⁰ N, 120 arc-second
• Mexico inputs derived by OWP (Nathan Patrick)– Used ANUSPLIN package; SMN and NCEI station inputs– 30 arc-sec
5
6
7
8
AORC Temperature/PrecipitationInputs
• Temperature:– Livneh et al (2015) daily Tmax/Tmin– (ftp://livnehpublicstorage.colorado.edu/public/Livneh.2016.Dataset/)
– NLDAS2 hourly temperature– PRISM 1981-2010 climatology 0.008° grid mesh
• Precipitation:– Livneh monthly precipitation totals– NLDAS2, Stage IV daily precipitation totals– Other radar-based inputs and CMORPH satellite– Climate Forecast System Reanalysis hourly
9
Pressure/Humidity/Wind/RadiationInputs
• From NLDAS2:– LW↓ (infrared)– SW↓ (solar)– Specific Humidity– Pressure– Wind Vectors
10
Challenges
• Cross border issues in precipitation analyses• Resolving timing mismatch between
daily/subdaily sources• Large time-space variations in quality of
precipitation estimates• Subdaily precipitation sources drop in/out• Long-term constraint to climatology is needed
11
Temperature Distribution Approach
• Mean temperature correction:– Maintain running 48-h average mean NLDAS2 and
mean Livneh temperatures– Mean Livneh temperature: (TLIVmax+TLIVmin)/2– Mean correction = TLIVmean - TNLDASmean
• Diurnal temperature range correction:– Expand/contract NLDAS2 min/max to a
temporally smoothed Livneh daily range• Final correction is weighted mean of
mean/range corrections12
Example: St. Louis, 6-10 Feb 2002:Blue Solid:NLDAS2 Dashed Black: Obs
Red Solid:Diurnal Range Correction (AORC)
13
Example: St. Louis, 6-10 Feb 2002:Blue Solid:NLDAS2 Dashed Black: Obs
Red Solid:Running Mean Correction (AORC)
14
NLDAS2 and AORC TDTR2100 UTC 6 Feb 1979
15
NLDAS2 AORC TDTR
NLDAS2 and AORC TDTR; Rocky Mountains2100 UTC 6 Feb 1979
16
NLDAS2 AORC TDTR
3h Temperatures00-00UTC 02-03 Feb 1979
17
Precipitation Distribution Approach• Monthly total precipitation from Livneh et al
(2015) dataset• Daily totals from:
– NLDAS2 1979-2009– StageIV + NLDAS2 2010+
• Hourly totals based on disaggregating daily totals:– StageII StageIV (radar) when available 1996+– CMORPH– Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR)– Applied Manually Digitized Radar and CFSR prior to
199618
1-h Precipitation27 July 2011
19
AORC/NLDAS2 Comparison
• North American Land Data Assimilation System v2 (NLDAS2) has been successfully used in NWM calibration
• AORC, StageIV, and NLDAS2 errors relative to NLDAS2
• Mean monthly temperature• Total monthly precipitation• Focus on 2007-2016 National Water Model
calibration period
20
Reference Monthly Precipitation/Temperature
• GHCN: Long-record sites in CONUS, Canada, Mexico back to early 20th century– https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/
• Have 125 sites, mostly in CONUS• Total precipitation, mean monthly temperature
21
Methods
• Published point GHCN values compared with NLDAS2, StageIV, and AORC values extracted from grids, bilinear interpolation– Note no downscaling applied to NLDAS2 data
• Statistics from each station time series:– Linear correlation year-over-year, by month– RMSE for year-over-year time series– Mean values
22
23
JAN
OCT
JUL
APR
TEMPERATURE, RMSE COMPARISONS
Notes on Temperature
• Many GHCN sites were used in the Livneh et al (2015) dataset that drives AORC
• Overall bias generally within 1.5°• High RMSE points in AORC are generally over
Canada/Mexico
24
25
JAN
OCT
JUL
APR
MONTHLY PRECIPITATION, RMSE COMPARISONS
Notes on Precipitation
• Many GHCN sites were used in the Livneh et al (2015) dataset that drives AORC
• Overall bias generally within 5mm• High RMSE points in AORC are generally over
Canada/Mexico• StageIV has some seasonally-dependent
biases, especially in the early part of the record < 2010
26
ConclusionsAORC/NLDAS Temperature/Precip Comparison
• In terms of accuracy, we generally got improvement over NLDAS2– Assume terrain downscaling is relatively minor
effect in the majority of sites, which are in locally flat terrain
• AORC had few major errors in terms of long-term biases– Some concern with Mexico sites – how
representative?
27
Experiments in Downscaling Winds• Noted that NLDAS2 winds model broad-scale
features related to terrain and climatology• Little relationship to small-scale terrain
features < 40-km wavelength• We derived high-resolution wind speed
climatology from NCEI station values, terrain• Attempted to apply wind speed bias
corrections to NLDAS2 original winds
28
NLDAS2 Mean WindsJanuary 18UTC
29
Climatology: High Plains, Rocky MountainsJanuary 18UTC
30
Values scaled by 10x
January Bias Wind Speed Correction Factors 00/06/12/18 UTC
31
Values scaled by 100x
Experiments in Downscaling Winds• Corrections did improve long-term mean wind
speed• However, could not demonstrate case-by-case
improvement at individual observing sites– Possibly due to directional dependence of terrain
acceleration/deceleration of winds
• Deferred wind downscaling until a more sophisticated method is identified
32
SW↓ from Satellite Sources
• GOES Solar Insolation Products (GSIP) available after 2014
• Evaluation showed SW↓ generally superior to NLDAS2– Relative to SURFRAD observations
• GSIP LW ↓ was not an improvement on NLDAS2
• Applied GSIP SW↓ when available, and in real-time updates
33
GSIP and NLDAS2 vs. SURFRAD SW↓
34
SW↓ from Satellite Sources
• Generation/transmission of the “GSIP” product suite from the next-generation GOES stopped in 2018
• Replacement product from ABI has much larger mesh (0.25° vs. nominal 4-km)
• Immediate and long-term problems: – Real-time replacement– Handling 2014-2017 period of record
• Current solution: – Insert NLDAS2 SW↓ rather than new ABI product– Replace GSIP with NLDAS2 for 2014-2017– Best hope for continuity in the products
35
SW↓ from NLDAS21800 UTC4 Feb 2018Nominal 0.125° mesh
SW↓ from ABI-GSIP1802 UTC4 Feb 2018Nominal 0.25° mesh
36
AORC Updating System• Utilizing new data sources for 2016 to present• URMA for temperature, humidity, winds• NLDAS2 for superCONUS LW↓, SW↓ • Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) for
OCONUS LW↓, SW↓ • StageIV precipitation for CONUS, Alaska, Puerto
Rico• NLDAS2 and Climate Prediction Center
precipitation for Canada, Mexico• Statistical adjustment of precip and URMA
temperature toward AORC climatology up to 2015
43