Date post: | 30-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | felicia-clements |
View: | 22 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Elias Métral /42
1
ANALYSIS OF SOME LHC FILLS WITH AND WITHOUT TRANSV. EMIT. BLOW-UP
Elias Métral Info from Gianluigi: Fills with blow-up
• 1731 (36 bunches/train) – 480 bunches
• 1736 (72 bunches/train) – 480 bunches => BU or not? => No data
• 1744 (72 bunches/train) – 624 bunches
• 1756 (72 bunches/train) – 768 bunches => No data
Fills with no-blow-up
• 1732 (36 bunches/train) – 480 bunches
• 1736 (72 bunches/train) – 480 bunches => BU or not? => No data
• 1745 (72 bunches/train) – 624 bunches => Fill not found
• 1755 (72 bunches/train) – 768 bunches
Some other fills with in particular the fill 1802 (rec. lumi of ~ 1.1E33,
i.e. good) and the fill 1803 where BU has been observed
Elias Métral /42
2
480 bunches with 36 / train
(13 × 36 + 12)
Fill # 1731 => BU
Fill # 1732 => No BU
480 bunches with 36 / train
(13 × 36 + 12)
B1H mainly
Elias Métral /42
3
768 bunches with 72 / train
(10 × 72 + 1 × 36 + 12)
624 bunches with 72 / train
(8 × 72 + 1 × 36 + 12)
Fill # 1744 => BU
Fill # 1755 => No BU
B1H mainly
Elias Métral /42
4
CONCLUSIONS
It seems that for the cases where transverse emittance blow-up was observed,
some coherent motions were also observed from the BBQ:
With trains of 36 bunches => After ~ 9 trains, i.e. ~ 4E13 p total intensity
With trains of 72bunches => After ~ 6 trains, i.e. ~ 5.5E13 p total intensity
We will see later that with trains of 108 bunches => After ~ 2-3 trains, i.e. ~
3-4E13 p total intensity
We will also see that it usually starts in the H plane of either B1 or B2
Elias Métral /42
5
Meas. on 19/05/2011 (1/9)
LHC injections with batches of 108 bunches => Started at ~ 17:20
Chroma ~ 2 in both planes and beams and TD gain ~ 0.25 in both planes and
both beams.
1092 on B1 at 17:55
1092 on B2 at 17:56 => New record (it was 1020 for the scrubbing run)
Transverse emittances meas. by Kevin => Seems to reveal ~ 2.5 microm on B1
and ~ 3.5-4 on B2 with ~ constant values along the batch => No instability!
Finished with ~ 1300 bunches in both beams without strange signals on the
BSRT
Elias Métral /42
6
Meas. on 19/05/2011 (2/9)
1092 bunches with 108 / train
(10 × 108 + 12)
Elias Métral /42
7
Meas. on 19/05/2011 (3/9)
Elias Métral /42
8
Meas. on 19/05/2011 (4/9)
Elias Métral /42
9
Meas. on 19/05/2011 (5/9)
Elias Métral /42
10
Meas. on 19/05/2011 (6/9)
Elias Métral /42
11
Meas. on 19/05/2011 (7/9)
Elias Métral /42
12
Meas. on 19/05/2011 (8/9)
We had to kick (without beam) as we were close to a time-out for the injection
kicker => After this we saw some losses increasing on the TCTV.4R8 and we
lose on B2, which is the bigger beam
We got the OK to inject more bunches and we will try and do this soon (19:24)
Elias Métral /42
13
Meas. on 19/05/2011 (9/9)
1200 bunches with 108 / train
(11 × 108 + 12)
Elias Métral /42
14
2nd meas. on 19/05/2011 (1/3)
768 bunches, with batches of 72 bunches, in stable beams => ~
7.5E32 peak luminosity
Elias Métral /42
15
2nd meas. on 19/05/2011 (2/3)
768 bunches, with batches of 72 bunches, in stable beams => ~
7.5E32 peak luminosity
Elias Métral /42
16
2nd meas. on 19/05/2011 (3/3)
Elias Métral /42
17
Fill # 1802 on 23/05/11 with peak lumi ~ 1.1E33 (1/2)
912 bunches, with batches of 108 bunches (874 colliding pairs), in
stable beams => ~ 1.1E33 peak luminosity, which would mean ~ 2.5
microm transverse emittances => 1st time we went above 1E33!
Elias Métral /42
18
Fill # 1802 on 23/05/11 with peak lumi ~ 1.1E33 (2/2)
Elias Métral /42
19
Fill # 1803 with BU (1/6)
912 bunches, with batches of 108 bunches (874 colliding pairs), in
stable beams => ~ 0.85E33 peak luminosity, which would mean larger
transverse emittances as before (~ 3.2 microm) and therefore BU!
Elias Métral /42
20
Fill # 1803 with BU (2/6)
Activity in B2H just after 2nd batch
injected for B2
Elias Métral /42
21
Fill # 1803 with BU (3/6)
Elias Métral /42
22
Inj. of 2nd batch at ~ 08:19:53
08:19:56 => Black
08:19:58 => Blue
08:19:56 => Black
08:20:07 => Green
08:19:56 => Black
08:20:19 => Red
Appearance of some lines here (-1,
0, 1) Mode 0 growing faster
Fill # 1803 with BU (4/6)
Elias Métral /42
23
08:20:01 => Purple
08:20:13 => Light blue
Fill # 1803 with BU (5/6)
Elias Métral /42
24
=> Some lines (-1, 0, 1) seem to appear but there is no beam loss
during this process, only some transverse emittance blow-up
Mode 0 seems to grow faster than the others
I would expect some beam losses from the TCBI… Furthermore, the
instability rise-times predicted are smaller than 1 s, whereas here it
seems to be several s
Could this be due to some ecloud activity?
Could this be due to some residuals from the injection (from the
longitudinal plane as observed during the scrubbing run, or due to
the undamped oscillations, or from the injection or abort gap
cleaning)???
=> To be followed up
Fill # 1803 with BU (6/6)
Elias Métral /42
25
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (1/14)
Fill # 1802 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
26
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (2/14)
Fill # 1803 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
27
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (3/14)
Fill # 1802 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
28
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (4/14)
Fill # 1803 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
29
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (5/14)
Fill # 1803 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
30
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (6/14)
Fill # 1802 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
31
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (7/14)
Fill # 1803 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
32
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (8/14)
Fill # 1803 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
33
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (9/14)
Fill # 1802 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
34
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (10/14)
Fill # 1803 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
35
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (11/14)
Fill # 1803 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
36
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (12/14)
Fill # 1803 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
37
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (13/14)
Fill # 1802 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
38
Comparison between fill 1802 good and 1803 bad, both with 920 bunches (14/14)
Fill # 1803 NicolasM
Elias Métral /42
39
24/05/11: 1st bad fill and then refill and good fill (1/4)
UTC time here, i.e. – 2 h!!!
Elias Métral /42
40
24/05/11: 1st bad fill and then refill and good fill (2/4)
Elias Métral /42
41
24/05/11: 1st bad fill and then refill and good fill (3/4)
Elias Métral /42
42
24/05/11: 1st bad fill and then refill and good fill (4/4)
Elias Métral /42
43
29/05/11: 1st a bad fill and then a good one (1/?)
Elias Métral /42
44
29/05/11: 1st a bad fill and then a good one (2/?)
Elias Métral /42
45
29/05/11: 1st a bad fill and then a good one (3/?)
Elias Métral /42
46
29/05/11: 1st a bad fill and then a good one (4/?)
Elias Métral /42
47
29/05/11: 1st a bad fill and then a good one (5/?)
Elias Métral /42
48
31/05/11: Good and bad fills again BUT at different positions (1/?)
This beam was not accelerated due to BU. Note that usually the activity was after ~ 2 batches whereas it
is the 4th in this case (and it is B2V 1st here)
Elias Métral /42
49
31/05/11: Good and bad fills again BUT at different positions (2/?)
Excellent fill
Elias Métral /42
50
31/05/11: Good and bad fills again BUT at different positions (3/?)
The activity is now observed after the 8th batch!
(B1H)
Some pbs seen on this fill but it nevertheless gave an initial peak lumi of ~ 1.2E33! (only a bit less compared to the previous one)
Elias Métral /42
51
31/05/11: Good and bad fills again BUT at different positions (4/?)
Elias Métral /42
52
01/06/11: Today’s 3 fills would have been excellent with respect to intensity (~ 1.3E11 p/b => ~ 1.4E14 p) and
transverse emittances => No BU on 3 consecutive fills! (1/4)
Elias Métral /42
53
01/06/11: Today’s 3 fills would have been excellent with respect to intensity (~ 1.3E11 p/b => ~ 1.4E14 p) and
transverse emittances => No BU on 3 consecutive fills! (2/4)
Elias Métral /42
54
01/06/11: Today’s 3 fills would have been excellent with respect to intensity (~ 1.3E11 p/b => ~ 1.4E14 p) and
transverse emittances => No BU on 3 consecutive fills! (3/4)
Elias Métral /42
55
01/06/11: Today’s 3 fills would have been excellent with respect to intensity (~ 1.3E11 p/b => ~ 1.4E14 p) and
transverse emittances => No BU on 3 consecutive fills! (4/4)
Elias Métral /42
56
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (1/?)
In fact the 4 consecutiverevealed no BU!!! (i.e. the one before
also)
Note also that contrary to what I thought we pulsed!
Elias Métral /42
57
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (2/?)
Elias Métral /42
58
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (3/?)
=> BU
Elias Métral /42
59
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (4/?)
Elias Métral /42
60
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (5/?)
Elias Métral /42
61
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (6/?)
Elias Métral /42
62
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (7/?)
Elias Métral /42
63
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (8/?)
Elias Métral /42
64
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (9/?)
Elias Métral /42
65
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (10/?)
Elias Métral /42
66
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (11/?)
Elias Métral /42
67
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (12/?)
=> BU
Elias Métral /42
68
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (13/?)
Elias Métral /42
69
01/06/11: More analysis of these good fills! Why??? (14/?)
Elias Métral /42
70
07/06/11: Bad fill again! (1/?)
Elias Métral /42
71
07/06/11: Bad fill again! (2/?)
Elias Métral /42
72
07/06/11: Bad fill again! (3/?)
Elias Métral /42
73
07/06/11: Bad fill again! (4/?)
Elias Métral /42
74
07/06/11: Bad fill again! (5/?)
Elias Métral /42
75
07/06/11: Bad fill again! (6/?)