+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Analysis of the zone connecting consecutive sectors in ... · Analysis of the zone connecting...

Analysis of the zone connecting consecutive sectors in ... · Analysis of the zone connecting...

Date post: 17-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 23 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Analysis of the zone connecting consecutive sectors in distillation columns by the Ponchon-Savarit method Analysis of the zone connecting consecutive sectors in distillation columns by the Ponchon-Savarit method University of Alicante Department of Chemical Engineering A. Marcilla*, M.D. Serrano and J.A. Reyes-Labarta. Dpto. Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. 99, Alicante 03080, Spain. Telf. (34) 965 903867 Fax (34) 965 903826. e-mail: [email protected] Summary References McCabe-Thiele [1] and Ponchon-Savarit [2] methods are two classical graphical methods for the design of binary distillation columns very useful for didactical purposes and for preliminary calculations. Nevertheless, their description in the literature is not complete and not all the cases are analysed. A previous paper [4] dealt with McCabe-Thiele and this work focuses on the Ponchon-Savarit method. A consistent analysis of what may happen when in the zone connecting consecutive sectors in the column (ZCCS) is presented for any feed condition, together with the different possibilities to extract products or to add or remove heat. Systematic analysis of the changes of sector [1] McCabe, W.L, Thiele, W.E. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1925, 17, 605. [2 Ponchon, M. Tech. Modern, 1921, 13, 20. Savarit, R. Arts et Métiers, 1922, 3, 65. ] [3] Ledanois, J.M.; Olivera-Fuentes, C. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1984, 23, 1-6. [4] Marcilla, A.; Serrano, M.D.; Reyes-Labarta, J.A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011. (Under review) Figure 1. Ponchon-Savarit H,h-y,x diagram and streams at the side stream stage for a generalized feed: a) FP approach; b) considering the sector of change. IPk D k+1 V k,0 V k+1,1 L k,NTk L GFk L k+1,0 IPk+1 V k,NTk V GFk D k c D k L k+1,1 GF k GF k L k+1,0 V k,0 V k+1,1 L k,NTk b) V GFk L GFk GF k V =V k+1,1 k,0 L k,NTk a) V k+1,2 L k+1,1 =L k+1,0 k,NTk k+1,1 k+1,1 k,NTk k+1,2 D k+1 V k,0,V k+1,1 FP L k,NTk L GFk ,L k+1,0 V k,NTk V GFk D k L k+1,1 GF k V k+1,2 L k+1,2 L GFk L k,NTk L k+1,0 V k,0 V GFk V k+1,1 MFk Lk+1,0 Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Lk,NTk Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1 Lk+1,1 Vk+1,2 MF = V k GFk Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Lk,NTk Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1 Lk+1,1 Vk+1,2 L = GFk Lk+1,0 V =V k+1,1 k,0 Lk,NTk Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1 Lk+1,1 Vk+1,2 =Lk+1,0 L = GFk MFk Lk+1,0 Lk,NTk Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1 Lk+1,1 Vk+1,2 V =V k+1,1 k,0 V = GFk MFk Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1 Lk+1,1 Vk+1,2 Lk,NTk=Lk+1,0 Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Lk,NTk Lk+1,0 EFk Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Lk,NTk Lk+1,0 EFk a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable LGFk VGFk LGFk VGFk 1. Scheme of the ZCCS 2. V =V GFk k+1,1 3. L =L GFk k,NTk 4. V =V and L =L GFk k+1,1 GFk k,NTk MFk Lk+1,0 Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Lk,NTk >MFk Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1 Lk+1,1 Vk+1,2 GFk L MFk Lk+1,0 Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Lk,NTk >MFk GFk V VGFk LGFk VGFk LGFk Dk c Dk+1 Dk FP IPk IPk+1 V ,V GFk k,NTk Vk,NTk-1 Vk,0 L ,L ,L GFk k+1,0 k,NTk Vk+1,1 Dk+1 Lk+1,1 LGFk FP IPk+1 Vk+1,2 Lk+1,2 Lk,NTk Lk+1,0 Dk c Dk+1 Dk IPk V ,V,V GFk k,0 k+1,1 Vk,NTk GFk Vk,0 Vk+1,1 FP Lk,NTk LGFk Lk+1,0 IPk+1 Vk,NTk VGFk Dk c Dk Lk+1,1 IPk Dk+1 Dk Dk c FP IPk IPk+1 Dk+1 Dk Dk c FP IPk IPk+1 Dk+1 Dk Dk c FP IPk IPk+1 Vk,NTk Lk,NTk V ,V ,V GFk k,0 k+1,1 Lk+1,0 LGFk Vk,NTk-1 V ,V GFk k,NTk Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Vk,NTk LGFk Lk+1,0 Lk,NTk k+1,1 V VGFk Lk+1,1 Dk+1 Dk Dk c IPk+1 IPk FP VGFk GF , L k GFk Vk,NTk Lk+1,0 Lk,NTk V ,V k,0 k+1,1 Lk+1,1 Dk+1 Dk Dk c IPk+1 IPk FP GF , L ,L k GFk k+1,1 Vk,NTk Lk+1,0 Lk,NTk V ,V ,V GFk k,0 k+1,1 Dk+1 Dk Dk c IPk+1 IPk FP Vk,NTk-1 Lk,NTk-1 Lk+1,1 V ,V GFk k,NTk GF , L ,L ,L k GFk k,NTk k+1,0 V ,V k,0 k+1,1 Dk+1 Dk Dk c IPk IPk+1 FP Dk Dk c IPk IPk+1 FP Dk Dk c IPk IPk+1 FP Vk,NTk V ,V ,V GFk k,0 k+1,1 Lk,NTk VGFk L ,L GFk k+1,1 Lk+1,0 Vk,NTk-1 L ,L ,L GFk k,NTk k+1,0 Dk+1 Dk+1 Vk+1,1 Lk+1,1 VGFk LGFk zGFk Vk,NTk Lk,NTk Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Lk+1,0 Dk+1 Dk Dk c IPk+1 IPk FP VGFk GF , L ,L ,L k GFk k,NTk k+1,0 Vk,NTk-1 Lk,NTk-1 Vk,NTk V ,V k,0 k+1,1 Lk+1,1 Lk+1,0 IPk+1 IPk Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Vk,NTk Lk+1,1 Vk+1,2 Lk+1,2 Dk+1 Dk Dk c Dk Dk+1 Dk c IPk+1 IPk Lk+1,1 VGFk Vk,0 MFk Dk+1 Dk Dk c FP IPk IPk+1 Dk+1 Dk Dk c FP IPk IPk+1 Dk+1 Dk Dk c FP IPk IPk+1 Vk,NTk L ,L k,NTk k+1,0 V ,V ,V GFk k,0 k+1,1 LGFk Vk,NTk-1 GF , V ,V k GFk k,NTk Vk,0 Vk+1,1 L ,L ,L GFk k,NTk k+1,0 Vk,NTk LGFk k+1,1 V Lk+1,1 Vk,0 Lk,NTk-1 GF ,V k GFk L ,L k,NTk k+1,0 Vk,0 xk+1,1 Dk+1 Dk Dk c IPk+1 IPk FP Vk,NTk LGFk GF , V ,V ,V k GFk k,0 k+1,1 L ,L k,NTk k+1,0 FP LGFk LGFk Lk,NTk Lk+1,0 Vk,0 VGFk Vk+1,1 Lk+1,1 V ,V ,V GFk k,0 k+1,1 L ,L ,L GFk k,NTk k+1,0 FP Lk,NTk Lk+1,0 LGFk VGFk Vk+1,1 Vk,0 Lk+1,0 LGFk Vk,0 Vk+1,1 Vk,NTk VGFk Dk Dk c Dk+1 Dk Dk c Dk+1 Dk Dk c Dk+1 Dk Dk+1 Dk c Dk Dk+1 Dk c Dk Dk+1 Dk c Dk Dk+1 Dk c Dk Dk c Dk+1 Dk Dk c Dk+1 Lk,NTk-1 Vk,NTk-1 Lk,NTk-1 Vk,NTk Lk,NTk Lk,NTk GFk GFk GFk GFk GFk GFk GFk GFk L ,L ,L GFk k+1,0 k,NTk Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1 Lk+1,1 Vk+1,2 Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1 Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1 Lk+1,1 Vk+1,2 Lk+1,1 Vk+1,2 When a feed stream is considered (GF ), whatever its physical condition, it is commonly assumed to be introduced to a single tray (k+1,1 in Fig. 1a) where it mixes with the vapour of the tray below (k+1,2) and with the liquid of the tray above (k,NTk). The streams leaving this feeding stage (L and V ) are considered to be in equilibrium and the separation between the liquid (L ) and vapour (V ) portions is considered to have a small influence in the calculations (V =V ,L =L ). The feed Gf is aligned with difference points (DP) and and this line crosses the dew curve in a unique point FP used as the reference for the calculation. Nevertheless, some authors consider the change of sector DP when the side stream is a partly vaporized feed [3]. To complete the academic literature dealing with this subject we have generalized equations for the operating lines or DP that define the change between two consecutive sectors for any feed condition, together with the different possibilities to extract products or to add or remove heat. According to nomenclature of Figure 2: k k+1,1 k+1,1 GFk GFk k+1,1 k,0 k+1,1 k+1,0, k k k+1 k k D D D D C C In this work all the streams involved in the connecting sector zones, as well as the corresponding DP, and their characteristics IP and IP , which define the optimum position for the side stream, are located in the diagrams. The example in Fig. 1b shows the case where the vapour and liquid portions of the feed stream differ with the streams developed in the column: V joins the vapour coming from the stage below (V =V +V ), which implies that V is aligned between V and V ; whereas L joins the liquid coming from the plate immediately above (L =L +L ) so L is aligned between L and L . In this case, neither V nor L are in equilibrium, so they are located outside the H,h/x curves, as shown in the magnifications presented in Fig.1b specified ones, since relationships among streams occurring in the changing sector zone are not fulfilled k k+1 GFk k,0 k+1,1 GFk k,0 k+1,1 GFk GFk k+1,0 k,NTk GFk k+1,0 k,NTk GFk k,0 k+1,0 This detailed analysis shows that, when solving a case of a design calculation products can only be extracted from liquid or vapour streams that actually exist in the column, and heat extractions or additions can also be done to existing streams, if not . Any other consideration leads to incoherent design predictions since relationships among streams occurring in the ZCCS are not fulfilled. the specifications of the column must be updated From the study of different examples we can state that the result obtained by using the ZCCS Ponchon-Savarit method and the FP approach may be nearly the same, though depending on the equilibrium of the particular system analysed and other variables. However the presented procedure provides a clear analysis of what is happening at the column, and allows being aware of the type of approximation normally carried out, thus facilitating the comprehension of the method, that otherwise could be misunderstood or difficult to be explained. strict Differences between the classical and ZCCS analysis A systematic analysis of the different possible situations is presented in Figure 3. This analysis does not only show the relationships occurring among the ZCCS but also between them and the rest of streams at the previous or subsequent stages.The streams developed in the rectification column can coincide with one of the vapour (V ) or liquid (L ) portions generated from the generalized feed and then be coincident with one of both streams defining the ZCCS (i.e. V or L ), as shown in column 2 and 3 of the figure. Otherwise, the equilibrium streams developed can differ from those originated from the side stream and lie inside the ZCCS, which should only be used once during the tray calculations (column 4). GFk GFk k+1,1 k,NTk 1. Scheme of the ZCCS 2. V =V GFk k+1,1 3. L =L GFk k,NTk 4. V =V and L =L GFk k+1,1 GFk k,NTk Figure 3. . Ponchon-Savarit y-x diagrams for a GF : a) MF >0, 0<q <1; b) MF >0, q <0; c) MF >0, q =0; d) MF >0, q =1; e) MF >0, q >1; f) MF <0, q =0; g) MF <0, q =1; h) EF <0; i) EF >0. For each one of these GF , different cases are analysed: 1. Scheme of the ZCCS; 2. V =V ; 3. L =L ; 4. V ?V and L ?L . k k GFk k GFk k GFk k GFk k GFk k GFk k GFk k k k GFk k+1,1 GFk k,NTk GFk k+1,1 GFk k,NTk å = + + + + + + + + D = × - × = × - × k 1 S 1 k 1 k GFS S D i , 1 k i , 1 k 1 i , 1 k 1 i , 1 k z z MF x D x L y V 1 k k 1 S GFS S D 1 k z MF x D z + = + D ÷ ø ö ç è æ × - × = å 1 k 1 k k 1 S S D D i , 1 k i , 1 k 1 i , 1 k 1 i , 1 k M EF Q h D h L H V + + = + + + + + + D = - + × = × - × å D L D+D MF S Q D Q R V k+1,i+1 L k+1,i L D EF S å = k s 1 å = k s 1 (x ,h ) D D (z , ) GFS S H F (x ,h ) k+1,i k+1,i (y ,H ) k+1,i k+1,i (x ,h ) D D (x ,H ) D D R (x ,h ) R R (z ) GFS Figure 2. Generalized scheme of a rectification column. Enthalpy and composition of streams have been included. ( ) ( ) C k 1 k 1 k GFk GFk C k GFk GFk k k C k / M h L / H V M M D D + = D - D = + + ( ) ( ) C k 1 k 1 k GFk GFk C k GFk GFk k k C k / z x L / y V z z D D + = D - D = + + GFk k C k V - D = D 1 k GFk C k L + D + = D http://iq.ua.es/gcef.htm
Transcript
Page 1: Analysis of the zone connecting consecutive sectors in ... · Analysis of the zone connecting consecutive sectors in distillation columns by the Ponchon-Savarit method Analysis of

Analysis of the zone connecting consecutive sectors indistillation columns by the Ponchon-Savarit method

Analysis of the zone connecting consecutive sectors indistillation columns by the Ponchon-Savarit method

University of Alicante Department of Chemical Engineering

A. Marcilla*, M.D. Serrano and J.A. Reyes-Labarta.Dpto. Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. 99, Alicante 03080, Spain.

Telf. (34) 965 903867 Fax (34) 965 903826. e-mail: [email protected]

References

McCabe-Thiele [1] and Ponchon-Savarit [2] methods are two classical graphical methods for the design of binary distillation columns very useful for didactical purposes and forpreliminary calculations. Nevertheless, their description in the literature is not complete and not all the cases are analysed.Aprevious paper [4] dealt with McCabe-Thiele and thiswork focuses on the Ponchon-Savarit method.Aconsistent analysis of what may happen when in the zone connecting consecutive sectors in the column (ZCCS) is presented forany feed condition, together with the different possibilities to extract products or to add or remove heat.

Systematic analysis of the changes of sector

[1] McCabe, W.L, Thiele, W.E. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1925, 17, 605.[2 Ponchon, M. Tech. Modern, 1921, 13, 20. Savarit, R. Artset Métiers, 1922, 3, 65.

]

[3] Ledanois, J.M.; Olivera-Fuentes, C. Ind. Eng. Chem.Process Des. Dev. 1984, 23, 1-6.[4] Marcilla, A.; Serrano, M.D.; Reyes-Labarta, J.A. Ind. Eng.Chem. Res. 2011. (Under review)

Figure 1. Ponchon-Savarit H,h-y,x diagram and streamsat the side stream stage for a generalized feed: a) FPapproach; b) considering the sector of change.

IPk

�k+1

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

Lk,NTk

LGFk

Lk+1,0

IPk+1

Vk,NTk

VGFk

�k

c

�k

Lk+1,1

GFk

GFk

Lk+1,0

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

Lk,NTk

b)

VGFk

LGFk

GFk

V =Vk+1,1 k,0Lk,NTk

a)

Vk+1,2 Lk+1,1=Lk+1,0

k,NTk

k+1,1

k+1,1

k,NTk

k+1,2

�k+1

Vk,0, Vk+1,1

FP

Lk,NTk

LGFk

, Lk+1,0

Vk,NTk

VGFk

�k

Lk+1,1

GFk

Vk+1,2

Lk+1,2

LGFk

Lk,NTk

Lk+1,0

Vk,0

VGFk

Vk+1,1

MFk

Lk+1,0

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

Lk,NTk

Vk,NTkLk,NTk-1

Lk+1,1Vk+1,2

MF = Vk GFk

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

Lk,NTk

Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1

Lk+1,1Vk+1,2

L =GFk

Lk+1,0V =Vk+1,1 k,0

Lk,NTk

Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1

Lk+1,1Vk+1,2

= Lk+1,0

L =GFk MFk

Lk+1,0

Lk,NTk

Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1

Lk+1,1Vk+1,2

V =Vk+1,1 k,0

V =GFk MFk

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

Vk,NTkLk,NTk-1

Lk+1,1Vk+1,2

Lk,NTk= Lk+1,0

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

Lk,NTk

Lk+1,0

EFk

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

Lk,NTk

Lk+1,0

EFk

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

f)

g)

h)

i) Not applicable

Not applicableNot applicable

Not applicableNot applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

LGFk

VGFk

LGFk

VGFk

1. Scheme of the ZCCS 2. V = VGFk k+1,1 3. L = LGFk k,NTk 4. V = V and L = LGFk k+1,1 GFk k,NTk

MFk

Lk+1,0

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

Lk,NTk>MFk

Vk,NTkLk,NTk-1

Lk+1,1Vk+1,2

GFkLMFk

Lk+1,0

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

Lk,NTk>MFk

GFkV

VGFk

LGFk

VGFk

LGFk

�k

c

�k+1

�k

FP IPk

IPk+1

V ,VGFk k,NTk

Vk,NTk-1

Vk,0

L , L , LGFk k+1,0 k,NTk

Vk+1,1

�k+1

Lk+1,1

LGFk

FP

IPk+1

Vk+1,2

Lk+1,2

Lk,NTkLk+1,0

�k

c

�k+1

�k

IPk

V , V , VGFk k,0 k+1,1

Vk,NTkGFk

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

FP

Lk,NTk

LGFk

Lk+1,0

IPk+1

Vk,NTk

VGFk

�k

c

�k

Lk+1,1

IPk

�k+1

�k

�k

cFP

IPk

IPk+1

�k+1

�k

�k

c

FPIPk

IPk+1

�k+1

�k

�k

c

FP

IPk

IPk+1

Vk,NTk

Lk,NTk

V , V , VGFk k,0 k+1,1

Lk+1,0

LGFk

Vk,NTk-1

V , VGFk k,NTk

Vk,0Vk+1,1

Vk,NTk

LGFk

Lk+1,0

Lk,NTk

k+1,1V

VGFk

Lk+1,1

�k+1

�k

�k

c

IPk+1

IPk

FP

VGFk

GF ,Lk GFk

Vk,NTk

Lk+1,0

Lk,NTk

V , Vk,0 k+1,1

Lk+1,1

�k+1

�k

�k

c

IPk+1

IPk

FP

GF , L , Lk GFk k+1,1

Vk,NTk

Lk+1,0

Lk,NTk

V , V , VGFk k,0 k+1,1

�k+1

�k

�k

c

IPk+1IPk

FP

Vk,NTk-1

Lk,NTk-1

Lk+1,1

V , VGFk k,NTk

GF , L , L , Lk GFk k,NTk k+1,0

V , Vk,0 k+1,1

�k+1

�k

�k

c

IPk

IPk+1

FP

�k

�k

c

IPk

IPk+1

FP

�k

�k

c

IPk

IPk+1

FP

Vk,NTk

V , V , VGFk k,0 k+1,1

Lk,NTk

VGFk

L , LGFk k+1,1

Lk+1,0

Vk,NTk-1

L , L , LGFk k,NTk k+1,0�k+1 �

k+1

Vk+1,1

Lk+1,1

VGFk

LGFk

zGFk

Vk,NTk

Lk,NTk

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

Lk+1,0

�k+1

�k

�k

c

IPk+1

IPk

FP

VGFk

GF , L , L , Lk GFk k,NTk k+1,0

Vk,NTk-1

Lk,NTk-1

Vk,NTk

V , Vk,0 k+1,1

Lk+1,1

Lk+1,0

IPk+1

IPk

Vk,0Vk+1,1

Vk,NTk

Lk+1,1

Vk+1,2

Lk+1,2

�k+1

�k

�k

c

�k

�k+1

�k

c

IPk+1IPk

Lk+1,1

VGFk

Vk,0

MFk

�k+1

�k

�k

c

FPIPk

IPk+1

�k+1

�k

�k

c

FPIP

k

IPk+1

�k+1

�k

�k

c

FP

IPk

IPk+1

Vk,NTk

L , Lk,NTk k+1,0

V , V , VGFk k,0 k+1,1

LGFk

Vk,NTk-1

GF , V , Vk GFk k,NTk

Vk,0

Vk+1,1

L , L , LGFk k,NTk k+1,0

Vk,NTk

LGFk

k+1,1V

Lk+1,1

Vk,0

Lk,NTk-1

GF ,Vk GFk

L , Lk,NTk k+1,0

Vk,0

xk+1,1

�k+1

�k

�k

c

IPk+1

IPk

FP

Vk,NTk

LGFk

GF , V , V , Vk GFk k,0 k+1,1

L , Lk,NTk k+1,0

FPLGFk

LGFk

Lk,NTk

Lk+1,0

Vk,0

VGFk

Vk+1,1

Lk+1,1

V , V , VGFk k,0 k+1,1

L , L , LGFk k,NTk k+1,0

FP

Lk,NTk Lk+1,0

LGFk

VGFk

Vk+1,1

Vk,0

Lk+1,0 LGFk

Vk,0Vk+1,1

Vk,NTk

VGFk

�k

�k

c

�k+1

�k

�k

c

�k+1

�k

�k

c

�k+1

�k

�k+1

�k

c

�k

�k+1

�k

c

�k

�k+1

�k

c

�k

�k+1

�k

c

�k

�k

c

�k+1

�k

�k

c

�k+1

Lk,NTk-1

Vk,NTk-1

Lk,NTk-1

Vk,NTk

Lk,NTk

Lk,NTk

GFk

GFk

GFkGFk

GFk

GFk

GFk

GFk

L , L , LGFk k+1,0 k,NTk

Vk,NTkLk,NTk-1

Lk+1,1Vk+1,2

Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1

Vk,NTk Lk,NTk-1

Lk+1,1Vk+1,2

Lk+1,1Vk+1,2

When a feed stream is considered (GF ), whatever its physical condition, it is commonly assumed to be introduced to a single tray

(k+1,1 in Fig. 1a) where it mixes with the vapour of the tray below (k+1,2) and with the liquid of the tray above (k,NTk). The streamsleaving this feeding stage (L and V ) are considered to be in equilibrium and the separation between the liquid (L ) and

vapour (V ) portions is considered to have a small influence in the calculations (V =V , L =L ). The feed Gf is aligned with

difference points (DP) and and this line crosses the dew curve in a unique point FP used as the reference for the calculation.

Nevertheless, some authors consider the change of sector DP when the side stream is a partly vaporized feed [3]. To complete

the academic literature dealing with this subject we have generalized equations for the operating lines or DP that define the

change between two consecutive sectors for any feed condition, together with the different possibilities to extract products or

to add or remove heat.According to nomenclature of Figure 2:

k

k+1,1 k+1,1 GFk

GFk k+1,1 k,0 k+1,1 k+1,0, k

k k+1

k

k

� ��

C

C

In this work all the streams involved in the connecting sector zones, as well as the corresponding DP, and their characteristics IP

and IP , which define the optimum position for the side stream, are located in the diagrams. The example in Fig. 1b shows the case

where the vapour and liquid portions of the feed stream differ with the streams developed in the column: V joins the vapour

coming from the stage below (V = V + V ), which implies that V is aligned between V and V ; whereas L joins the liquid

coming from the plate immediately above (L = L + L ) so L is aligned between L and L . In this case, neither V nor

L are in equilibrium, so they are located outside the H,h/x curves, as shown in the magnifications presented in Fig.1b specified

ones, since relationships among streams occurring in the changing sector zone are not fulfilled

k

k+1

GFk

k,0 k+1,1 GFk k,0 k+1,1 GFk GFk

k+1,0 k,NTk GFk k+1,0 k,NTk GFk k,0

k+1,0

This detailed analysis shows that, whensolving a case of a design calculationproducts can only be extracted from liquidor vapour streams that actually exist in thecolumn, and heat extractions or additionscan also be done to existing streams, if not

. Any other consideration leads toincoherent design predictions sincerelationships among streams occurring inthe ZCCS are not fulfilled.

the specifications of the column must beupdated

From the study of different examples wecan state that the result obtained by usingthe ZCCS Ponchon-Savarit methodand the FP approach may be nearly thesame, though depending on theequilibrium of the particular systemanalysed and other variables. However thepresented procedure provides a clearanalysis of what is happening at thecolumn, and allows being aware of the typeof approximation normally carried out, thusfacilitating the comprehension of themethod, that otherwise could bemisunderstood or difficult to be explained.

strict

Differences between the classical and ZCCS analysis

A systematic analysis of the different possible situations is presented in Figure 3. This analysis does not only show the relationshipsoccurring among the ZCCS but also between them and the rest of streams at the previous or subsequent stages.The streamsdeveloped in the rectification column can coincide with one of the vapour (V ) or liquid (L ) portions generated from the

generalized feed and then be coincident with one of both streams defining the ZCCS (i.e. V or L ), as shown in column 2 and 3

of the figure. Otherwise, the equilibrium streams developed can differ from those originated from the side stream and lie inside theZCCS, which should only be used once during the tray calculations (column 4).

GFk GFk

k+1,1 k,NTk

1. Scheme of the ZCCS 2. V = VGFk k+1,1 3. L = LGFk k,NTk 4. V = V and L = LGFk k+1,1 GFk k,NTk

Figure 3. . Ponchon-Savarit y-x diagrams for a GF : a) MF >0, 0<q <1; b) MF >0, q <0; c) MF >0, q =0; d) MF >0, q =1; e) MF >0, q >1; f) MF <0, q =0; g) MF <0, q =1; h)

EF <0; i) EF >0. For each one of these GF , different cases are analysed: 1. Scheme of the ZCCS; 2. V =V ; 3. L =L ; 4. V ?V and L ?L .k k GFk k GFk k GFk k GFk k GFk k GFk k GFk

k k k GFk k+1,1 GFk k,NTk GFk k+1,1 GFk k,NTk

��

�������� ���������k

1S1k1kGFSSDi,1ki,1k1i,1k1i,1k

zzMFxDxLyV1k

k

1SGFSSD1k

zMFxDz ��

� ���

�� ���� �

1k1k

k

1SSDDi,1ki,1k1i,1k1i,1k

MEFQhDhLHV ���

������ ��������� �

D

LD+ D

MFS

QD

QR

Vk+1,i+1

Lk+1,i

LD

EFS��

k

s 1

��

k

s 1

(x ,h )D D

(z , )GFS SHF

(x ,h )k+1,i k+1,i

(y ,H )k+1,i k+1,i

(x ,h )D D

(x ,H )D D

R (x ,h )R R

(z )GFS

Figure 2.Generalizedscheme of arectificationcolumn. Enthalpyand compositionof streams havebeen included.

� � Ck1k1kGFkGFk

CkGFkGFkkk

Ck /MhL/HVMM �������� ��

� � Ck1k1kGFkGFk

CkGFkGFkkk

Ck /zxL/yVzz �������� ��GFkk

Ck V���� 1kGFk

Ck L �����

http://iq.ua.es/gcef.htm

Recommended