Analytical Estimation of Dynamic Aperture Limited by Wigglers
in a Storage Ring
高傑 J. Gao弘毅
Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur LinéaireCNRS-IN2P3, FRANCE
KEK, Feb. 24 2004
ContentsDynamic Apertures of Limited by
Multipoles in a Storage RingDynamic Apertures Limited by Wigglers in a Storage RingDiscussionsPerspectiveConclusionsReferencesAcknowledgement
Dynamic Aperturs of Multipoles
Hamiltonian of a single multipole
Where L is the circumference of the storage ring, and s* is the place where the multipole locates (m=3 corresponds to a sextupole, for example).
k
mm
zm
kLsLxxB
BmxsKpH )*(!1
2)(
2 1
12
2
Eq. 1
Important Steps to Treat the Perturbed Hamiltonian
Using action-angle variablesHamiltonian differential equations should be
replaced by difference equations
Since under some conditions the Hamiltonian don’t have even numerical solutions
pH
dtdq
qH
dtdp
Standard MappingNear the nonlinear resonance, simplify
the difference equations to the form of STANDARD MAPPING
sin0KII
I
Some explanationsDefinition of TWIST MAP
)1)(mod(xg
)(Kfxx
)()1( ff
xdx
xdg ,0)(
where
Some explanationsClassification of various orbits in a Twist Map, Standard Map is a special case of a Twist Map.
Stochastic motions
For Standard Mapping, when global stochastic motion starts. Statistical descriptions of the nonlinear chaotic motions of particles are subjects of research nowadays. As a preliminary method, one can resort to Fokker-Planck equation .
97164.00K
m=4 Octupole as an example
Step 1) Let m=4 in , and use canonical variables obtained from the unperturbed problem.
Step 2) Integrate the Hamiltonian differential equation over a natural periodicity of L, the circumference of the ring
Eq. 1
m=4 Octupole as an example
Step 3) 111 4sin AJJ
111 JB
ABK 40
LbsJ
A mx 342
1
2)(
LbsB mx3
42 )(2
m=4 Octupole as an example
Step 4) )97164.0(140 ABK
LbsJ
mx ||)(21
3421
2/1
34
2
4
2/12/1
1,, ||)(2
)()(
))(2(
Lbs
ss
sJA mxmx
xxxoctdyna
One gets finally
General Formulae for the Dynamic Apertures of Multipoles
21
1
)2(21
2, ||))2((1)(2
m
m
m
mx
xmdyna LbmsmsA
i j kkdecadynajoctdynaisextdyna
totaldyna
AAA
A...111
1
2,,
2,,
2,,
,
2,,2
1
1,, )(
)( xAssA xsextdynay
xysextdyna
Eq. 2
Eq. 3
Super-ACOLattice Working point
Single octupole limited dynamic aperture simulated by using BETA
x-y plane x-xp phase plane
Comparisions between analytical and numerical results
Sextupole Octupole
2D dynamic apertures of a sextupole
Simulation result Analytical result
WigglerIdeal wiggler magnetic fields
)cos()sinh()sinh(0 ksykxkBkkB yx
y
xx
)cos()cosh()cosh(0 ksykxkBB yxy
)sin()sinh()cosh(0 ksykxkBkkB yx
yz
2222 2
wyx kkk
Hamiltonian describing particle’s motion
)))sin(())sin(((21 222 ksApksAppH yyxxzw
))cosh())cosh(1 ykxkk
A yxw
x
where
y
xyx
wy k
kykxkk
A ))sinh())sinh(1
Particle’s transverse motion after averaging over one wiggler period
)32(
22232
22
2
2
2
xykxkxk
kds
xdx
w
x
)32(
2 2
22232
22
2
2
2
y
xy
w
y
kkk
yxykyk
kds
yd
In the following we consider plane wiggler with Kx=0
One cell wigglerOne cell wiggler Hamiltonian
After comparing with one gets
one cell wiggler limited
dynamic aperture
i
wy
w iLsyk
yHH )(124
1 42
22
201,
2/1
2
2
,13
)()()(
wy
w
wy
yy ks
ssA
Eq. 4
Eq. 4 Eq. 1
2
23
3 w
wykLb
Using one getsEq. 2
A full wiggler Using one finds dynamic aperture for a
full wiggler
or approximately
where is the beta function in the middle of the wiggler
w
wwiy
wN
i yw
ywN
i yiywN
NLss
kAsA )()(31
)(1
,2
1 2
2
1 2,
2,
wy
w
my
y
ywN LkssA
2,,
)(3)(
my,
Eq. 3
Multi-wigglers
Many wigglers (M)
Dynamic aperture in horizontal plane
M
j ywjy
ytotal
sAsAsA
1 2,,
2
,
)(1
)(1
1)(
2,,2
,
,,, yAA ywigldynamx
myxwigldyna
Numerical example: Super-ACO
Super-ACO lattice with wiggler switched off
Super-ACO (one wiggler)7.2)( mw 017.0)(, mA ny 019.0)(, mA ay
13)(, mmy 17584.0)( mlw 5168.3)( mLw
Super-ACO (one wiggler)3)( mw 023.0)(, mA ny 024.0)(, mA ay
7.10)(, mmy 17584.0)( mlw 5168.3)( mLw
Super-ACO (one wiggler)4)( mw 033.0)(, mA ny 034.0)(, mA ay
5.9)(, mmy 17584.0)( mlw 5168.3)( mLw
Super-ACO (one wiggler)
4)( mw
016.0)(, mA ny 017.0)(, mA ay
5.9)(, mmy
08792.0)( mlw
5168.3)( mLw
033.0)(, mA ny 034.0)(, mA ay17584.0)( mlw
067.0)(, mA ny 067.0)(, mA ay35168.0)( mlw
Super-ACO (two wigglers)6)( mw 032.0)(, mA ny 03.0)(, mA ay
75.13)(, mmy 17584.0)( mlw 5168.3)( mLw
Discussions The method used here is verygeneral and the analytical resultshave found many applications insolving problems such as beam-beameffects, bunch lengthening, haloformation in proton linacs, etc…
Maximum Beam-Beam Parameter in e+e- Circular Colliders
Luminosity of a circular collider
IPye
yce
yx
ce
rfNfNL
242
)(2,
yxy
IPyeey
rN
where
Beam-beam interactionsKicks from beam-beam interaction at IP
),,( ,'' yxee yxfrNxiy
222),,,(
yxyxyxf
)(222exp)(2 222
2
2
2
22 yx
y
x
y
y
yxyx
yixwyxiyxw
Beam-beam effects on a beam
We study three cases
2
2' 4exp12
rr
rNr ee
xx
xx
ee duuxrNx
2
0
22
2' exp4exp2
yx
xx
ee yerfxrNy
22exp2
2
2'
(RB)
(FB)
(FB)
Round colliding beam
Hamiltonian
22)(
22
2eeyy rNyskpH
kkLsyyy )(......1152
164
14
1 66
44
22
Flat colliding beams
Hamiltonians
kxxx
kLsxxx )(......1801
1211 6
64
42
2
kyxyxyx
kLsyyy )(......1201
1211 6
54
32
22)(
22
2eexx
x rNxskpH
22
)(2
22
eeyyy rNyskpH
Dynamic apertures limited by beam-beam interactions
Three cases
Beam-beam effect limited lifetime
)(
16)(
)( 2
2
2,8,
IPyee
ydyna
srNssA
)(
6)(
)( 2
2
2,8,
IPxee
x
x
xdyna
srNssA
)(
23)(
)(2
2,8,
IPyee
yx
y
ydyna
srNssA
(RB)
(FB)
(FB)
)()(exp)(
)(2 2
2,,
1
2
2,,
, ssA
ssA
y
ybbdyna
y
ybbdynayybb
Recall of Beam-beam tune shift definitions
)(2,
yxx
IPxeex
rN
)(2,
yxy
IPyeey
rN
Beam-beam effects limited beam lifetimes
Round beam
Flat beam H plane
Flat beam V plane
xx
xxbb 3exp32
1
,
yy
yybb 4exp42
1
,
yy
yybb
23exp
23
2
1
,
Important finding
Defining normalized beam-beam effect limited beam lifetime as
An important fact has been discovered that the beam-beam effect limited normalized beam lifetime depends on only one parameter: linear beam-beam tune shift.
y
bbbbn ,
Theoretical predictions for beam-beam tune shifts
msy 30
FByFByRBy ,max,max,max 89.1324
0843.0)1(,max hourbbRBy
0447.0)1(,max hourbbFBy
For example
Relation between round and flat colliding beams
First limit of beam-beam tune shift (lepton machine)
or, for an isomagnetic machine
whereHo=2845
*These expressions are derived from emittance blow up mechanism
NrH
IP
ey R 60,max
NT
IPy
Hy
0
20
,max
Second limit of beam-beam tune shift (lepton machine)
Flat beam V plane
0447.02
3exp
0447.02
32
,
1
,,
y
Maxy
y
Maxyyybb
Some Examples
DAFNE: E=0.51GeV,ymax,theory=0.043,ymax,exp=0.02 BEPC: E=1.89GeV,ymax,theory=0.039,ymax,exp=0.029 PEP-II Low energy ring:
E=3.12GeV,ymax,theory=0.063,ymax,exp=0.06 KEK-B Low energy ring:
E=3.5GeV,ymax,theory=0.0832,ymax,exp=0.069 LEP-II: E=91.5GeV,ymax,theory=0.071,ymax,exp=0.07
Some Examples (continued)
PEP-II High energy ring: E=8.99GeV,ymax,theory=0.048,ymax,exp=0.048
KEK-B High energy ring: E=8GeV,ymax,theory=0.0533,ymax,exp=0.05
Beam-beam effects with crossing angle
Horizontal motion Hamiltonian
Dynamic aperture limited by synchro-betatron coupling
22)(
22
2eexx
x rNxskpH
kxxx
kLszxzxzx )(......)(1801)(12
1)(1 66
44
22
zee
x
IPx
xxbetasyn rNs
ssA4
2/1
3,2
)(3)(2)(
Crossing angle effect
Dynamic aperture limited by synchro-betatron coupling
Total beam-beam limited dynamic aperture
2
22
2,
,1
32
)()(
xx
xbetasynxbetasyn s
sAR
x
zWhere
is Piwinski angle
xbetasynFByxbetasynFBy
yxtotalbb
RRRR ,,8,
1
,,8,
, 111exp
111
4
KEK-B with crossing angle KEK-B luminosity reduction vs Piwinski
angle
Perspective
It is interesting and important to study the tail distribution analytically using the discrete time statistical dynamics, technically to say, using Perron-Frobenius operator.
Conclusions1) Analytical formulae for the dynamic apertures limited by multipoles in general in a storage ring are derived.2) Analytical formulae for the dynamic apertures
limited by wigglers in a storage ring are derived.
3) Both sets of formulae are checked with numerical simulation results.4) These analytical formulae are useful both for
experimentalists and theorists in any sense.
References1) R.Z. Sagdeev, D.A. Usikov, and G.M. Zaslavsky,
“Nonlinear Physics, from the pendulum to turbulence and chaos”, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1988.
2) R. Balescu, “Statistical dynamics, matter our of equilibrium”, Imperial College Press, 1997.
3) J. Gao, “Analytical estimation on the dynamic apertures of circular accelerators”, NIM-A451 (2000), p. 545.
4) J. Gao, “Analytical estimation of dynamic apertures limited by the wigglers in storage rings, NIM-A516 (2004), p. 243.
Acknowledgement
Thanks go to Dr. Junji Urakawa forinviting the speaker to work on ATFat KEK, and to have this opportunityto make scientific exchange with youall, i.e. 以文会友 .