Date post: | 22-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | pamela-simmons |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Andrew Feig: Dept. of Chemistry
Carl Bauer: Dept. of BiologyLynda Delph: Dept. of BiologyViola Ellison: Dept. of BiologyBill Harwood: School of EducationRoger Innes: Dept. of BiologyGeorge Rebec: Dept. of Psychology, Neurobiology Program
The Integrated Freshman Learning Experience (IFLE)– an Experimental Approach to Discovery
Learning at the Introductory Level
Cottrell Scholars Meeting, July 9-11, 2004
HHMI Biological Sciences Education ProgramResearch Corp.
Form Should Follow Function
Recent research from educators shows that many standard instructional practices in undergraduate teaching – traditional lecture, laboratory, and recitation courses – are relatively ineffective at helping students master and retain the important concepts of their disciplines over the long term. These practices, moreover, do not adequately develop creative thinking and do not encourage the use of investigative and collaborative problem-solving skills that employers often seek.
-- WB Wood and JM Gentile, Science (2003) 302:1510
Knowledge building
The IU-HHMI Learning Ladder
Active Inquiry
Integrated Understanding
Conceptual Learning
Factual Recall
Capstone
IFLE
ICE
SRI for Teachers
K-12 interventionImproved pipeline~10/summer
Large format coursesInquiry-basedGrad student teacher training~2,300/year
InterdepartmentalEntry level experienceOpen-endedInquiry-basedRemove research- teaching dichotomy~ 20/year
Expand research opportunitiesUndergrad research journal~ 100/year
IFLE - The Design Phase
Pedagogical problems IFLE is trying to address:
late entry of students into laboratory experiences poor integration of subject matter lack of inquiry-based experiences little development of teamwork skills
Targets incoming freshman already intent on a science major
Course content to be steered by student interest not faculty decreestudents to select topic and then figure out what they need to know
Cross-departmental experience:team-taught to look at a core questions from different perspectivesexplore how disciplines build on each other
Premise: Inquiry and exploration are more important than factual recall
IFLE Program in a Nutshell
Pre-freshman research experience8-week introduction to research in IU laboratories
IFLE CurriculumThree 10-week modules over 2 semestersreplaces intro biology sequence
Post-freshman year research experience
Program folds into IU-STARS program, Capstone, and independentresearch
Goals for Student Development
Provide a foundation for future science learning change student approach to learning
science is more about what scientists do, than the facts they know introduce central themes currently being studied by scientists encourage future laboratory research
Teach students to ask the right questions distinguish those that are finite enough to be answered readily
Develop scientific writing skills through assignments, critiques, and rewriting
Instill a general knowledge of common techniques used across fields of study
The IFLE Modules
1. The Subcellular MilieuWhat types of molecules are involved?What is their environment like?How do they respond to environmental stimuli?What roles do they play?
2. Cells and Their EnvironmentHow do you define a cell?How do cells become specialized in their functions?How do cells communicate?How do cells sense their environment and respond to it?
3. Neurocircuits and BehaviorWhat distinguishes neurons from other cells?How do neurons communicate?How are they organized?How do neurons control behavior?
IFLE Mechanics - the 1st Year
5 students began program1 dropped out after first semester
Met weekly to discuss scientific topics over summer
Formal class times - 5 hrs twice/week (4.5 Cr course)
Students had 24/7 access to converted research lab equipped for classalso contained office/interaction space
1 major graded assignment per module intermediate assignments turned in but not graded
Note: lab setup cost ≈$250,000 using HHMI grant fundsall research grade equipment
The IFLE Classroom - Student Collecting Data while TA Observes
Student/Faculty Feedback - Year 1
Extremely high satisfaction rating (students and faculty) very small sample size
Too little class timeAdjust class sessions to include short and long periodsmake better use of hours
Major change in perception regarding what students are capable ofeven freshmen
Too little structure for entering studentsmust phase in increasing independence over yearextra writing assignments and reading quizzes to be added
Students who completed curriculum all doing lab work this summermentors indicate huge gains in lab skills and confidence
Challenges for Year 2
ExpansionWorking with 17 students this fall rather than 5
AdjustmentAlter curriculum to meet observed deficienciesNew faculty member taking over one module due to sabbatical leave
AssessmentFollow first cohort as they enter main-stream coursesUnderstand how faculty changed by teaching in this way
Begin consideration of perpetuationHow to incorporate learning style after grant period ends if assessmentwarrants
Student Learning and Faculty Adjustment
Issues pertaining to student maturity:Students had no concept of how to self-direct learningDid not understand inquiry even though they had selected
inquiry-based program
Issues pertaining to time management:Carrot and stick mentality pervaded
students focused on classes with formal/traditional structure over IFLE assignments
Issues pertaining to knowledge base:Students initially did not seek out necessary knowledge - expected
to be given info in classHad to install quizzes to ensure out-of-class preparation
Program Assessment
Student Learning Gains and Attitudes:
Curriculum being shadowed by graduate student from School of EducationSurveys/interviews compared to non-IFLE cohorts focusing on:
what is scienceapproach to sciencehow to seek scientific understanding
GPA and other standard academic performance measures
Faculty Development:
Teaching journal Interviews with faculty before, during and after teaching
Role of inquiry in teachingUse of inquiry and discovery methods in non-IFLE teaching Changes in commitment to teaching
Are IFLE faculty more likely to be ambassadors of teaching within their depts?
Barriers to Interdisciplinary Teaching
Department culturefocus on research above all elseteaching innovation is not conducive to cutting-edge research
Interdepartmental politicsBiology Dept (which is strong) viewed as “enemy” rather than teammate
Cooperation viewed as disloyalty perspective that time is used to support goals of another dept.
Monetary perspectiveBest teachers needed in large, highly visible teaching assignmentsRecruit students (grad or undergrad) into department
Credit and CompensationWhich Dept. gets teaching credits and kudos?If teaching is done with another department, who covers home dept. load?
Acknowledgements
HHMIResearch Corp.
IU COAS
Carl BauerLynda DelphViola EllisonBill HarwoodRoger Innes
George Rebec
Trudy McConnellTeddie Phillipson
Faculty Involved
Logistics and Analysis
THE IFLE STUDENTS
Support