Date post: | 30-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | kenneth-smith |
View: | 17 times |
Download: | 1 times |
The effect of climate change and systematic model bias on the monsoon-ENSO system: the
TBO and changing ENSO regimes
Andrew Turner ([email protected])
Pete Inness, Julia Slingo
Outline
• Basis for study & heat flux adjustments.
• The effect of systematic bias in the future.
• Changing ENSO regimes and their properties.
• Why the eastward tendency?
• TBO in the model.
• Monsoon predictability and the observed record.
Background
• GCMs which generate mean climatologies close to observations are more likely to correctly represent interannual variability of precipitation. (Sperber & Palmer 1996).
• Equatorial Pacific SSTs important predictor of monsoon (Charney & Shukla 1981).
• Heat flux adjustments used at 1xCO2 to correct systematic biases (Turner et al. 2005).
• Systematic model errors likely to have large impact on future predictions.
• Same adjustments used at 2xCO2.
Possibilities for tendency to T-modes
• Weakening of trades allows deepening of thermocline in east Pacific (Federov & Philander 2001) dominance of vertical movements over zonal advection.
• Wang & An 2002 see similar pattern to 2xCO2 or FA response in 1976 climate shift, and with increased mean upwelling in east, decreased zonal temperature gradient.
Tendency to biennial period
• Subsurface Kelvin wave propagation more prevalent during biennial regime.
• Meridional confinement of wind stress response to ENSO (Kirtman 1997; Guilyardi et al. 2004) shortens period.
Summary
• Tendency to T-mode ENSO (together with associated Kelvin-wave behaviour at depth) when FA applied / CO2 doubled.
• Lack of broad meridional wind stress response in HadCM3 shortens period (only comes to light during strong T-mode behaviour).