+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Animal Rights

Animal Rights

Date post: 08-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: yanni
View: 40 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Animal Rights. Helena Pereira de Melo [email protected] May 2013. What do you see?. A laboratory rabbit A pet rabbit A meat rabbit A wild rabbit. Or…an. Easter - bunny. Why? XX Centuries. Regeneration – remarkable fertility indispensable for a prey animal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
61
1 Helena Pereira de Melo [email protected] May 2013
Transcript
Page 1: Animal Rights

1

Helena Pereira de [email protected]

May 2013

Page 2: Animal Rights

2

Page 3: Animal Rights

3

a) A laboratory rabbit

b) A pet rabbitc) A meat rabbitd) A wild rabbit

Page 4: Animal Rights

Easter - bunny

4

Page 5: Animal Rights

•Regeneration – remarkable fertility indispensable for a prey animal•Their paws are removed as part of fertility charms

5

Page 6: Animal Rights

•Food•Companion•Entertainment (circus, sports)•Medical experiments•Clothing•Symbolic

6

Page 7: Animal Rights

•PAIN•DISTRESS•SUFFERING•CONFINEMENT•LONELINESS•TRADE•LOST OF HABITATS

7

Page 8: Animal Rights

a) Right to life

b) Right to liberty

c) Respect of animal dignity

8

Page 9: Animal Rights

A.Human beings are superior to nonhuman animals and occupy a privileged place in the moral order

B.All species deserve equal moral consideration

9

Page 10: Animal Rights

1. Only human beings deserve moral consideration

2. All human beings deserve equal moral consideration

3. All nonhuman animals lack moral standing

4. There is nothing we can do to them that will wrong them

10

Page 11: Animal Rights

Criterion of moral consideration:

11

Page 12: Animal Rights

1. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274)2. Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804)3. René Descartes (1596 – 1650)

12

Page 13: Animal Rights

“Divine providence makes provision for the intellectual creature for its own sake, but for other creatures for the sake of the intellectual creature”

(Differences between Rational and Other Creatures)

13

Page 14: Animal Rights

•Only rational moral agents are “members of the kingdom of ends” and so animals have no moral standing•Animals are not “ends in themselves” but “means to an end, and that end is man”•We have no duties regarding them

14

Page 15: Animal Rights

We should be kind to animals and abstain from cruelty to them because “he who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealing with men” while “tender feelings towards dumb animals develop human feelings towards mankind”

(Duties in Regard to Animals)

15

Page 16: Animal Rights

All non-human animals are incapable of using language – they are mindless machines, mere automata devoid of thought and reason (Animals are Machines)

16

Page 17: Animal Rights

In order to have rights a being has to be an autonomous moral agent with the capacity to fulfill reciprocal obligations.Animals do not have rights.

(The Animal Rights Debate, 2001)

17

Page 18: Animal Rights

18

Page 19: Animal Rights

Do animals really lack rationality?

19

Page 20: Animal Rights

“Answer me, machinist, has nature arranged all the means of feeling in this animal, so that it may not feel? Has it nerves in order to be impassible? Do not suppose this impertinent contradiction in nature”(“A Reply to Descartes”)

20

Page 21: Animal Rights

“there is no fundamental difference between man and the higher animals in their mental faculties”There is a continuum of mental capacities among animal species

(“Comparison of the Mental Powers of Man and the Lower Animals”)

21

Page 22: Animal Rights

“The impressive linguistic accomplishments of various gorillas, chimpanzees, and parrots…”

(Language Acquisition in Nonhuman Primates)

22

Page 23: Animal Rights

The chimpanzee and human genomes are more than 98% identical, but there are a few short DNA sequences that have changed significantly in humans since the 2 species diverged about 5 million years ago

23

Page 24: Animal Rights

24

Page 25: Animal Rights

25

Page 26: Animal Rights

• the soul is immortal and after death it transmigrates into other animated bodies• all animated beings are kindred, and belong to one great family•men shall not eat animals

26

Page 27: Animal Rights

•The eating of flesh “makes us spiritually coarse and gross by reason of satiety and surfeit”•Animals deserve moral consideration because they are sentient, intelligent creatures

27

Page 28: Animal Rights

“justice lies in restraint and harmlessness towards everything that does not harm”

“since justice consists in not injuring any thing, it must be extended as far as to every animated nature”

(On Abstinence from Killing Animals)

28

Page 29: Animal Rights

“The relevant question is not, Can they reason? Nor Can they talk? But, Can they suffer”?

(A Utilitarian View)

29

Page 30: Animal Rights

•There is no morally relevant difference between humans and animals•“Universal compassion for every living thing” is the only genuine moral motive

(On the Basis of Morality)

30

Page 31: Animal Rights

SPECISM = RACISM

31

Page 32: Animal Rights

“The complete denial by human animals of ethical relations to the rest of the animal world is a phenomenon not differing either in character or cause from the denial of ethical relations by a tribe, people or race of human beings to the rest of the human world… The human being who extends his moral sentiments to all the members of his own species, but denies to all other species the justice he accords to his own, is making the same ethical mess of it as the savage”

(Universal Kinship)

32

Page 33: Animal Rights

PETER SINGER

TOM REGAN

33

Page 34: Animal Rights

All animals are equal = all animals deserve to have their interests considered equally with the interests of other animals, regardless of their race, gender or species

(“Animal Liberation”, 2002)

34

Page 35: Animal Rights

35

Page 36: Animal Rights

Only sentient beings are worthy of moral consideration

36

Page 37: Animal Rights

1. We give equal consideration to the interests of all beings

2. We act in ways that maximize the satisfaction of interests of all affected by our conduct

37

Page 38: Animal Rights

Rabbits do not have tear ducts and cannot flush out substances that are put in their eyes

38

Page 39: Animal Rights

39

Page 40: Animal Rights

“Giving animals equal consideration requires that we give their pleasures and pain equal weight with humans pleasures and pains when carrying out utilitarian considerations”

40

Page 41: Animal Rights

“Since eating plant-based foods can satisfy our interest in nutritious meals without requiring animals to suffer in factory farms, utilitarianism requires us to eat plants instead of animals”

41

Page 42: Animal Rights

Non-human animals “who have an individual experimental welfare” may have moral rights

(Animal Rights and Human Obligations, 1989)

42

Page 43: Animal Rights

Source: fundamental moral valuesRights to non-interferenceRight not to be killed, not to be tortured,

to bodily integrity

43

Page 44: Animal Rights

Rejects the utility-maximization principle because it sanctions sacrificing individuals for the

greater good

44

Page 45: Animal Rights

45

Page 46: Animal Rights

“Aunt Bea has inherent value, i.e., value in herself, which is independent of her usefulness to us. Even if killing Aunt Bea and using her wealth to build a children’s hospital would maximize utility, it would be wrong to kill her, because it would fail to respect her inherent right as an individual.”

46

Page 47: Animal Rights

Many animals are also experiencing subjects of a life, have inherent value and moral rights in the same sense and with the same strength that humans do.All who have inherent value have it equally, regardless of their sex, race, religion, species, intellectual capacity, sexual preference…

(Defending Animal Rights, 2001)

47

Page 48: Animal Rights

A new liberation movement is needed to combat speciesism – this arbitrary prejudice in favor of our kind and the forms of animal exploitation that flow from it.

48

Page 49: Animal Rights

Which animals deserve legal consideration?

How much legal consideration do they deserve?

49

Page 50: Animal Rights

“All animals have equal rights to exist within the context of biological equilibrium. This equality of rights does not overshadow the diversity of species and of individuals.”

(art. 1)

50

Page 51: Animal Rights

1. Life (crime against life)2. Not to be subjected to bad

treatments or cruel acts3. To live and to reproduce in

freedom (wild animals)4. To proper sustenance and

care (pets)

51

Page 52: Animal Rights

Protocol on Protection and Welfare of Animals

52

Page 53: Animal Rights

53

DESIRING to ensure improved protection and respect for the welfare of animals as sentient beings,

HAVE AGREED UPON the following provision,

In formulating and implementing the Community's agriculture, transport, internal market and research policies, the Community and the Member States shall pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals, while respecting the legislative or administrative provisions and customs of the Member States relating in particular to religious rites, cultural traditions and regional heritage.

Page 54: Animal Rights

There are 1000 bullfighting events in Spain each year, in which 5000 bulls die.

54

Page 55: Animal Rights

1. Intra-community trade

2. Imports3. Animal disease

control4. Animal nutrition5. Animal welfare

55

Page 56: Animal Rights

1. European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes (1976)

2. European Convention for the Protection of Animals for Slaughter (1979)

3. Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (1979)

4. European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes (1986)

5. European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals (1987)

56

Page 57: Animal Rights

“1 Nobody shall cause a pet animal unnecessary pain, suffering or distress.2. Nobody shall abandon a pet animal.”(art. 3)

57

Page 58: Animal Rights

Sont meubles par leur nature les animaux et les corps qui peuvent se transporter d'un lieu à un autre, soit qu'ils se meuvent par eux-mêmes, soit qu'ils ne puissent changer de place que par l'effet d'une force étrangère.

58

Page 59: Animal Rights

“Tratando-se de aluguer de animais,as despesas de alimentação destes correm sempre, na falta de estipulação em contrário, por conta do locatário.”

59

Page 60: Animal Rights

“It is only when nations recognize animals and provide them certain constitutional guarantees that we can expect a more enlightened and equitable code of conduct towards other living beings.”

60

Page 61: Animal Rights

Recommended