Date post: | 18-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | debra-golden |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Animal Wholesomeness studies
Wilna Jansen van Rijssen PhDGMASSURE23 - 25 November 2015
CONTENTS•Purpose of studies•Animal studies to evaluate input trait from GM crops•Animal studies to evaluate output traits from GM crops
PURPOSE of studies
To confirm the nutritional value of the GM crop
USE OF ANIMAL FEEDING STUDIES: GROWTH PERFORMANCE
• Detection of potentially unintended effects • Broiler studies are standard component of
assessment – safety and nutrition• Rapid growth period when sensitive to
SMALL nutritional or anti-nutritional changes
Best Practices – animals studies – • INPUT TRAITS
• Crop protection against diseases, insect damage, tolerance to herbicides
• OUTPUT TRAITS• Nutritionally enhanced• Reduced levels of toxicants
POULTRY MEAT PRODUCTION
FLOW CHART: GM diet preparations
SEED
Planting/
growing/harvest/ storage
Analysis
Process
Analysis
Formulate diet
s
Manufac
turing diets
Animal/
product
assessment
Data
analysis
Report /sampl
ing retenti
on
LIMITING VARIABILITY - STATISTICAL ANALYSIS - NUMBER OF ANIMALS
POULTRY: Diet
•Starter diet•Grower diet•Finisher diet
Best Practices• Production, Handling, Storage, Processing crop• Sampling, analysis• Statistical analysis and interpretation of results
QUALITY CONTROL: Production, Handling, Storage, Processing crop
SOPs / records Planting (planting design, maintenance of plots) Field plots Growing season Agronomic performance Harvesting Transport equipment Grain storage locations Unloading Storage (e.g. storage moisture) Sample Crops processing
QUALITY CONTROL: Sampling (internationally agreed methods)
•Sample lot•Grain sampling (probe)•Hay sampling•Green chopped forage sampling•Pasture sampling•Mixed diet sampling•Handling of samples
QUALITY CONTROL: Analysis
•Analysis of :▫Introduced trait▫Pesticides, mycotoxins▫Nutrients, anti-nutrients▫Toxicants
•Analytical methods:▫Chemical, microbiological
NUTRIENT ANALYSISCrops/grain/Co-products
Livestock type Analyte
Grain: maize, wheat, barley Non-ruminants xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Oilseed meals, soybean, linseed, cottonseed, canola meal, full-fat oilseeds
Non-ruminants xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Grain: maize, wheat, barley Ruminants xxxxxxxxxxxx
etc
Anti-nutrients in crops
CROP OF PRODUCT ANTiNUTRIENT
Soy bean / soy bean meal Trypsin inhibitors / lectins
Canola / canola mealRapeseed / rapeseed meal
Glucosinolates
Cotton, cottonseed, cottonseed meal
Gossypol, cyclopropenoid fatty acids
MYCOTOXINS
Aflatoxin B1 Fusarenon X
Aflatoxin B2 Deoxynivalenol (DON)
Aflatoxin G1 15- acetyl - DON
Aflatoxin G2 3-acetyl-DON
Ochratoxin A Nivalenol
Citrinin Zearalenone
T-2 toxin Fumonisin B1
HT2-toxin Fumonisin B2
Diacetoxiscirpenol Fumonisin B3
Neosolaniol
ACCREDITED LABORATORIES
•GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICES (GLP)▫OECD▫SANAS
• METHODS• AOAC official methods e.g.
STATEMENTS: signed
•Study leader•Members of team•Forms – transfer (chain of custody),
storage, field characteristics, plot plan, field history fertilizers, herbicides
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
•Hypothesis – basic objectives, what to accomplish
•Treatments•Experimental units (pens?)•Measurements•Experimental design•Can the experimental design be analysed
properly?
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS (BLOCKS) NEEDED TO DETECT A TREATMENT DIFFERENCE AT P<0.05
Coefficient of
variation (%)
EXPECTED DIFFERENCE (%)
5 10 15 20 25
2 4 3 2 - -
3 7 3 3 2 -
4 12 4 3 3 2
5 17 6 4 3 3
6 24 7 4 3 3
.
.
30 566 142 63 37 24Randomized complete block design with 2 treatments, two-tailed test of significance at P<0.05, 80% power
PERFORMANCE, CARCASS YIELD, MEAT QUALITYItem GM soybean Control References
(6)
PERFORMANCE
Live weight D0
Live weight D42
Feed intake (kg/bird) & kg/pen)
Feed conversion factor (kg/kg)
CARCASS YIELD (relative)
Live weight/fat/thigh/drum/wing etc
QUALITY
Moisture/protein/fat (breast/thigh
INTERPRETATION
•Non-statistical knowledge should be incorporated
•Design and analysis should be kept simple•Difference between statistical and
practical significance is important
Interpretation of experimental results
▫Researchers with background and training to interpret results
▫Historical data – same lab and other labs
Best Practices – animals studies – output traits•Increased nutrient concentrations•Decreased toxicant concentrations
Case study
•Comparison of performance and carcass parameter when fed diets containing soybean meal produced from GM-soy bean (HIGH OLEIC ACID) control (nearest isoline) or conventional reference soybeans (6 lines)
Poultry meat production
•Nutrient requirements•Understanding of nutrient digestion,
metabolism, intermediary metabolism , nutritional physiology, pathology and nutrient flow and retention in the bird
•Management of broiler performance▫Climate conditions, water quality
Poultry meat productionDiet formulation and processing•Particle size, enzyme supplements, change in starch matrix (e.g. effects on gelatinization of the starch), anti-nutritional factors, including growth promoters etc•Digestibility studies (increased amounts of cellulose or hemicellulose, increase amount of amino acids•Bioavailability studies (digestion, absorption, metabolism•Sensory (organoleptic) evaluation
PERFORMANCE /CARCASS PARAMETERS•GM soybean meal (increased level of oleic
acid) compared with control and references
•Different levels of GM soybean ? •Parameters•Weight gain – feed intake – feed
conversion•Organs and muscle weights as % of
carcass weight•Fatty acid composition of animal fat•Liver enzymes (GOT etc) liver damage etc
CONCLUSION• The results of this study support the conclusion that
there are no differences between the GM meal and the control and the conventional references.
• Therefore the GM meal is equivalent to conventional in the marketplace.
• This study confirms the results from extensive compositional analysis which showed no nutrient and antinutrient differences between the GM and control.
• The data support the conclusion that GM crop is as wholesome and nutritious as the conventional crop on its ability to support rapid growth and equivalent carcass yield
references• International harmonisation of study protocols for livestock and poultry performance
ILSI Best Practices ….animal studies……GM crops…output/input traits, 2007
• VICH (2000) Good clinical practices, VICH GL9 (GCP) Available http://vich.eudra.org/pdf/2000/G109_st7.pdf
• Nutrient requirement of domestic animals - cattle, chickens, etc , National Academy of Science , USA
• Taylor et al (2007) Broiler performance and carcass parameters – diets containing GM soymeal, Poultry Science, 86:26-14