+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: joseph2429
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 28

Transcript
  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    1/28

    EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PRACTICE IN NURSING

    INTRODUCTION

    Evaluation of the learners clinical practice is critical element in professional educational program.

    Teachers in a professional program such as nursing, medical, etc must concern themselves not only withevaluating the students mastery of behavioral objectives as demonstrated by usual academic procedures

    but must also assess the students competency in actual practice. Professionals practice their and are held

    accountable for the quality of practice. Thus the development of practice competencies in critical

    dimension of any professional program and must a matter of continuous evaluation.

    Clinical practice may be viewed as the way or medium through which a professional

    practitioner ministers to his/her client. Thus clinical practice may be conceptualized as the way the nurse

    utilizes a particular constellation of abilities to meet the health needs of the client.

    Nurse teachers must develop a concept of clinical practice in terms of nature of actions

    involved, the client served, and the relationship of the nurse to the clients and their problems. The concept

    of the teacher holds determines the expectations, the evaluation strategies, and the reward system

    associated with clinical practice.

    Since the nursing process is the methodology of practice, the major focal point in evaluating

    clinical practice is the learners competency in using the process. Identification of nursing actions implicit

    in the process serves as the basis for evaluation. The nursing actions are behavioral objectives.

    Evaluations of learners practice skill occur in an environment with built-threats and pressures.

    Not only does the supervisory process, by its nature, generate anxieties but the process takes place in an

    environment that makes the learner particularly vulnerable. The developmental process that changes of

    behavior takes place in full view of patients, colleagues, and other health workers. Care must be taken that

    game playing is not resorted to as a means of lessening threats in clinical field.

    PURPOSES OF CLINICAL EVALUATION

    1.To assess quality and standard of clinical performance of students, e.g. Is performance satisfactory or

    unsatisfactory?

    2. To reinforce excellent and good performance, and help those students whose work is just at acceptable

    level?

    3. To identify performance deficiencies, and areas of unsatisfactory performances; to inform student or

    help her to identify her shortcomings, and to correct poor work habits before they become entrenched; to

    decide whether student needs further training, supervision or guidance.

    4. To establish a basis for guiding and counseling students.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    2/28

    GOALS TO BE ACHIEVED

    *To determine whether the student has sufficient knowledge for the established level of clinical

    practice.

    *To provide feedback to encourage or discourage certain behavior.

    *To determine the level of clinical performance of the student.

    *To provide a record for the promotion, demotion and dismissal of professional in clinical

    practice.

    ASPECTS TO BE OBSERVED IN EVALUATION

    1. Evaluation must appraise the behavior of the student, as the education brings certainly change in

    behavior.

    2. Evaluation must involve, more than a single appraisal at any time to determine whether change hastaken place or not, appraisal at an early point and at later points is needed to identify the changes that may

    be occurring

    PRINCIPLES OF CLINICAL EVALUATION

    Clinical evaluation methods and techniques need to be:

    *OBJECTIVE

    *RELIABLE

    *VALID

    *ACCEPTABLE

    *FEASIBLE

    Objective: Evaluation should be based on facts, observed behaviors and adequate sampling of student

    behaviors.

    Reliable: Method used is consistent, stable, e.g. There is close agreement about students performance

    when two instructions arrive at the same conclusion.

    Valid: Evaluation measures what it is intended to measure, e.g. .interpersonal skills or technical skills.

    Acceptable: Current thinking suggests that methods used should be acceptable not only to the clinical

    instructors and supervisors but also for to students whose performance is being evaluated; students should

    be familiar with expected performance standards.

    Feasible: Methods should be realistic, practical and not too costly; a first class evaluation tool may have

    to be discarded if it is too costly in terms of time and money.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    3/28

    TYPES OF CLINICAL EVALUATION

    1. THE FORMATIVE EVALUATION: The assessments are made during the teaching learning

    process to monitor the progress of students and provide feedback to the students. It examines incidents

    and events related to student learning. To identify and overcome the weakness.

    2THE SUMMATIVE EVALUATION: It is the final assessment of student achievement after a

    designated period of time, at the end of course or training programme .It surveys the pattern of behavior

    noted in a group of events and incidents. The educator summarizes the past events.

    PLANNING OF CLINICAL EVALUATION

    *Define the learning objective.

    *Specify the standard performance.

    *Select appropriate method for evaluation.

    *Enough samples of behavior must be recorded for summative evaluation.

    *The recording of evaluation process should be deliberate and ongoing, reliability, and practicability.

    CLASSIFICATION OF CLINICAL EVALUATION

    Many different types of clinical evaluation methods have been developed. The evaluation of

    is based primarily on direct observation and evidenced of quantity or quality of work done. Non one

    procedure is suitable totality of practice. Strategies chosen should reflect the particular behavioral

    objectives to be evaluated, the needs of the learner, and character of the practice setting. For clinical

    evaluation, the quantitative techniques are to measure the clinical practice. The selected qualities

    techniques or procedures suitable for clinical practice evaluation included the following.

    I )OBSERVATIONAL TECHNIQUES

    1. CHECKLISTS2. RATING SCALE3. ANECDOTAL SCALE4. CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE.

    II )WRITTEN COMMUNICATION SKILLS

    1.NURSES NOTES

    2.PROBLEM ORIENTED RECORDS

    3.NURSING CARE STUDIES

    4.PROCESS RECORDING

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    4/28

    III) ORAL COMMUNICATION METHODS

    1. NURSING PATIENT CARE CONFERENCES

    2 TEAM CONFERANCES

    1. OBSERVATIONAL TECHINQUES.

    One the evaluative procedures of the practice dimensions of the student learning used most often is the

    observation of the student behavior during nursing practices. An observation technique generally implies

    the use of a particular observational tool such as rating scale, checklist, etc. However the process of

    observing and recording an individuals behavior is what is meant by phrase observation technique.

    THE ADVANTAGES OF OBSERVATION are as the follows

    1. Frequent observation of a students work and work habits can provide a continuous check on his

    progress.

    2. The errors or problems, as they arise can be immediately directed and corrective action taken quickly.

    3. Observational techniques are not so time consuming as meaning for the student as are achievement

    tests.

    4. Observational data provide teachers with valuable teachers with valuable supplementary information,

    much of which could not be obtained in any other way.

    Observational is the most direct, timely and inexpensive means of clinical performance evaluation. It is

    the task of the observer to organize observation, so that the data will be collected systematically and will

    organize observations that the data will be collected systematically and will be comparable among

    different observers.

    An observation is used as a method of evaluation. It should be used as be valid. The following

    suggestions help make valid observations:

    1. Plan in advance what is to be observed?

    2. The observer must be cognizant of sampling errors. There should be frequent ,short observations

    distributed over a period of several weeks and at different times of the day.

    3. Coordinate the observations with your teaching .Otherwise, there is real great danger that invalid

    observations will result

    4. Record and summarize the observation immediately after it has occurred. More important, however, is

    the fact that when pupils know they are being observed, their resultant behavior may be typical.

    5. Make no interpretations concerning the behavior until later on. Otherwise, it may interfere with the

    objectivity of gathering observation data.

    6. Prepare some sort of list, guide a form to help, make the observation process objective and systematic.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    5/28

    TYPES OF OBSERVATION TOOLS

    A) CHECKLIST

    A checklist consists of a listing of steps, activities, or behavior which the observer records when an

    incident occurs. A checklist enables the observer to note only whether or characteristic is present. A major

    limitation of the checklist is that it doesnt indicate quality of the checklist is limits to procedure,activities, functions and specific tasks. Only a limited component of overall clinical performance can be

    evaluated by checklist.

    There are some advantages of checklist, as given or detailed below:

    1. They are adaptable to most subject matters areas.

    2. They are useful in evaluating those learning activities that involve a procedure process and some

    aspects of personal social adjustment.

    3. They are most useful for evaluating those learning activities that involve a procedure process that canbe subdivided into a series of clear distinct, separate actions.

    4. When properly prepared, they constrain the observer to direct his attention to clearly specified traits or

    characteristics.

    5. They allow interindividual comparisons to be made on a common set of traits or characteristics.

    6. They provide simple methods to record observations.

    7. They objectively evaluate traits or characteristics.

    CONSTRUCTION OF CHECKLISITS

    While constructing the checklist the following points to be kept in mind

    1. Express each item in clear, simple language.

    2. Avoid lifting statements verbatim from the text

    3Avoid negative statements wherever possible.

    4Make sure that each item is clearly yes or no, true or false and the like.

    5 Review the items independently.

    UTILIZATION OF CHECKLISTS

    While the checklist, evaluator should keep in mind the following:

    1Use of checklist only when you are interested in ascertaining whether a particular trait or characteristic is

    present or absent.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    6/28

    2 Use only carefully prepared checklist for more complex kind of trait.

    3 Clearly specify the traits or characteristics of behavior , to be observed .

    4 Observe only one student at a time and confine your observations to the points specified in the

    checklist.

    5 Have separate checklists for each student, individual observations can be recorded on a master

    6 The observer must be trained how to observe, what be trained how to observe, what to observe and how

    to record the observed behavior .To make a valid judgments he should omit recording those behaviors for

    which he has sufficient information.

    Checklists require the observer to judge whether certain behavior of student and clinical practice has

    taken place. For example, a checklist could be used in observing the activities of a nursing student taking

    blood pressure and giving an injection. Some actions must be performed in certain sequence if a given

    task is be done competently. Most laboratory procedures and some physical examations fall into this

    category.

    ANECDOTAL RECORD

    An anecdotal record is running description of actual examples of behavior of a student as observed by

    teachers and the counselor. It is followed by his comments. These are descriptive accounts of episodes or

    occurrences in the daily life of the student.(Brown and Martin).Thus an anecdotal record is a report of

    significant episode in the life of a student.

    Anecdotal record is are cord of some significant item of conduct ,a record of an episode in the life of the

    student , a word picture of the student in action,a word snapshot at the moment of the incident, any

    narration of events in which may be significant about his personality.-Randall.

    Anecdotal record ,as the name implies, involves setting down an anecdote concerning some aspects of

    student behavior which implies ,involves setting down an anecdote concerning some aspects of students

    behavior which seems significant to the observer.

    CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ANECDOTAL RECORDS

    These are records of specific incidents factual description of important and meaningful event or behavior

    of students on informal occasions. Each event or behavior is described shortly after it occurs.

    The characteristics as given below;

    1. Anecdotal records should contain factual descriptions of what happened, when it happened, and underwhat circumstances the behavior occurred.

    2. The interpretations and recommended action should be noted separately from the descriptions.

    3. Each anecdotal record should contain a record of a single incident.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    7/28

    4. The incident recorded should be that is considered to be significant to the students growth and

    development of example.

    ANECDOTES

    1. Kum.Ganga is seen in library, sitting in a corner, preparing nursing careplan of cardiovascular diseases.

    DATE ON 12.3.2008

    2. Ganga is found to be only girl responding to the teachers question on cardiovascular nursing.

    3. Ganga was caught reading a book Medical and Surgical Nursing during Community Health

    Nursingclinicas and was asked to leave the room.

    Interpretation: Gaga should be encouraged to do more in medical surgical nursing and also not to neglect

    Community Health Nursing and other subjects.

    4. Any significant behavior, be it in the classroom, in the school or college, or outside the college, i.e in

    the clinical areas should be recorded.

    5The exact behavior of the student should be recorded; inferences, guesses, or assumptions must be

    avoided, unless it signifies.

    6The facts presented in all the anecdotes must be arranged so that they may be studied in relation to one

    another.

    7The record should be regarded as confidentiality should not fall into irresponsible hands.

    8Words and phrases are employed that are definable in terms of things rather than other words, concrete

    statements are preferred to abstract ones.

    Anecdotal record is a brief account of a critical incident. Anecdotal records of critical incidents that occurduring a students clinical experience are quite useful provided focus is on incidents that reflect effective

    behaviors and ineffective behaviors.

    The first part of an anecdotal record should be factual, simple and clear

    *Name of the student

    *Unit/ward/departments

    *Date and time

    *Brief report of what happened.

    2. The second part of the anecdotal record may include additional comments, analysis and conclusions

    based on interpretations and judgments.

    The first part answers:

    *Who was involved?

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    8/28

    *Where did it take place?

    *When did it occur?

    *What happened?

    The second part answers

    *How and why the behaviors occurred.

    Follow ABC rule in writing anecdotal records.

    A. Accuracy.

    B .Brevity

    C .Clarity

    Descriptive reports: The instructor writes a brief report on student nurses performance over a given

    period.

    Instructor decides what to include in a report and she may quite inconsistent unless she is guided by some

    kind of a structure.

    ANECDOTAL NOTES

    Anecdotal notes are frequently used in nursing education for recording data about the students practice

    and reliability. An anecdotal note is a recorded description of the behavior and activities of the learner

    during a particular performance of short duration.

    When behavioral objectives are identified for clinical practice, nurse teachers should make decision as to

    how each is to be evaluated. All students will be evaluated on the same behavioral objectives by the same

    number of notes. This system also objectives by the same number of notes. This system also helps the

    faculty to be realistic about the number of notes it is possible to collect in any clinical practice period.

    Anecdotal notes are valuable to record longitudinal data about the students progress in developing

    practice competency.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    9/28

    BEHAVIOUROBJECTIVE EVALUATION

    1.Assumes responsibilities for explaining procedures to a school agechild before beginning a task

    2. Auscultation technique accurately

    In two out of three observationsrudent explains the recorded in

    anecdotal notes the student

    explains the procedure.Criteria for evaluation

    1.Explanation precedes the startof the procedure2.Explanation is in the language

    understandable to the child

    3. Explanation is accurate.

    4.child is encouraged to askquestions and express concerns5. Questions are answered

    accurately and sensitively

    Criteria for evaluation

    1.Identifies the proper land mark

    2.Uses stethoscope properly

    3.Distinguishes sounds correctly

    4.Carries out procedure within areasonable time frame

    CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE

    Behavioral O bjective ON

    1.Shares on assessment of patient needs

    With colleagues in nursing teamy Two critical incidents from

    team conferences.

    Criteria for evaluation1.Identify

    a. Learner behaviorwhich assisted team

    members inunderstanding patients

    needs.

    b. Learners behaviors whichinterfered with the team

    members understanding ofpatients needs.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    10/28

    The concept of critical incident differs from that of an anecdote .Fivers and Gonsells define a critical

    incident as one that makes significant difference in the outcome of an activity. It may be the positive

    factors that contribute towards the cusses of the behavior or it may be negative factors that interfere with

    the completion of the assignment.

    The critical incident technique is effective for formative evaluation; it enables the learner and the

    teacher to assess the learners behaviors in relation to their impact on the outcome of action. It can alsobe

    used in summative evaluation, provided several critical incidents are used to judge the students

    mastery of behavior under consideration.

    RATING SCALE

    Rating means the judgmental of one by another. Rating is, in essence, direct observation .A rating scale

    is a method by which we systematize the expression of opinion concerning a trait. These ratings are done

    by the parents, teachers, a broad of interviewers and judges and by the self as well. These ratings scale

    given an idea of personality of the individual .For example, the important aspects known as attitude orstyle is a part of all interactions between nurses and other which includes patients relatives, friends,

    village leader, administrator, managers and fellow members of health team etc. To evaluate such aspects

    rating scales are more likely to provide a better record than checklist. Rating scales provide systematic

    procedure for obtaining ,recording, and reporting the observers judgment .That may be filled out while

    the observation is made ,immediately after the observation is made, or as often in the case, long after the

    observation.

    ADVANTAGES OF RATING SCALE.

    1. Technically, rating scale is standard device for recording quantitative and qualitative judgments about

    observed performance.

    2. They evaluate procedures such as playing an instrument, operating an equipment or machine. Working

    in laboratory, demonstrating the nursing procedures, typing, cooking, oral reading, acting in play .,etc.

    3. They help the teachers to rate their students periodically on various characteristics such as punctuality,

    honesty, enthusiasm, cheerfulness, cooperativeness, considerations of others and other personality traits

    In general, rating scales with behaviorally expressed items are more helpful than those with items

    expressed as a list of traits; the behaviors are less ambiguous.

    4. They can also be used by a student to rate himself.

    5. They can also be used with a large number of students.

    6. They tend to be very adaptable and flexible.

    7. They can be efficient and economical in the use of a teachers time

    8 They can be comprehensive in the amount of information recorded

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    11/28

    9 They can help to reduce the subjectivity and unreliability that are usually associated with observations

    method.

    DISVANTAGES OF RATING SCALES

    Rating scales have certain limitations that must considered when certain limitations that must be

    considered when a evaluator is determining their use within a perform.

    1 There is a lack of uniformity with which terms are interpreted by evaluators. This is a particularly true

    with used to designate various intervals in the rating continuum. An operational definition that includes

    illustrations of acceptable behaviors for each interval can facilitate reliability.

    2 There is a lack of uniformity with which terms are interpreted by evaluators .This is a particularly true

    with which terms are interpreted by evaluators. This is particularly true with used to designate various

    intervals in the rating continuum. An operational definition that includes illustrations of acceptable

    behaviors for each interval can facilitate reliability.

    3 There are common sources of errors in rating scale. All of these sources affect the validity of rating.

    Errors may be due to:

    1. Ambiguity

    2Personality of the rater: Halo effect; personal bias; logical error.

    3Attitude of the rater

    4 Opportunity for adequate observation.

    They represent descriptive data of clinical performance that suggest areas of strength and weaknesses.

    Used with different color markings for each evaluation period this scale helps to present of the

    Students developmental process. In this use of the scale, teachers must define the data base

    They will use and strategies for obtaining the data, so that markings on the scale will reflect

    The students total learning experiences.

    TYPES OF THE RATING SCALE

    Numerical rating scales: This is one of the simplest types of rating scales. The rater simply

    Marks a number that indicates the extent to which a characteristic or trait is present. The trait is

    Presented is a statement and values from 1 to 5, are assigned to each trait that is rated.

    Typically a common key is used throughout, the key providing a verbal description.

    Direction: Encircle the appropriate number showing the extent to which the pupil exhibits his

    Skills: In the questioning.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    12/28

    Key: 5 outstanding, 4 above, 3 average, 2 below average,1 unsatisfactory.

    Skill

    1. Questions were specific 12345

    2. Questions were revelent to topic discussed.12345

    3. Questions were grammatically corrected 12345

    Graphing rating scale: As in the cases of the numerical rating scale, the rate is required to

    Assign some value to a specific trait. This time however, instead of using predetermined scale

    Values, the ratings are made in a graphic form-a position anywhere along a continuum

    EXAM OF GRAPHIC OFRATING SCALE

    1. Where the illustrations used interesting?

    Too little ,little, adequate, much, too much,

    1,2,3,4,5.

    2.How attentive were you in the class

    1,2,3,4,5

    Very attentive, inattentive, ,attentive very attentive

    3. Did the speech show good organization?

    1,2,3,4,5

    Very attentive, _,average, ,very good

    Advantage: If a number of traits are rated on the same page with a common set of categories ,a

    behavioral profile can be constructed.

    Descriptive graphic rating scale: This type of scale is generally the most desirable type of the scale to use.

    EXAMPLE OF DESCRIPTIVE GRAPHIC TYPE OFRATING SCALE

    DIRECTIONS: As shown above for the graphic rating scale.1.While preparing a blackboard summaryhow was the penmanships?

    Legible, beautiful, uniform size and Normally readable good looking, fluent motion, Illegible, badlooking tends to draw outlines slant.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    13/28

    Such specific descriptions contribute to a greater objectivity of the rating process. The description also

    helps to clarify and further define a particular dimension.

    RankingIn the ranking procedure, the rater ,instead of assigning a numerical value to each to each

    student with regard to a characteristic, ranks a given set of individuals from high to low on the

    characteristic this is rated. To ensure that the pupils are validity ranked, rank from both extremes towards

    the middle. This simplifies the task of the teacher. The ranking procedure becomes very cumbersome

    when large number of students or characteristics per student are to be calculated.

    WRITTEN COMMUNICATION METHODS AS CLINICAL EVALUATION

    Nurses communicate among themselves and among practioners of their discipline through the written

    media. Various forms of written communication serve as significant evaluation strategies .In this type of

    evaluation, one is concerned with two dimensions, skill in communicating and quality of the substance

    communicated .The usual methods are as follows:

    1 .NURSES NOTES

    2. PROBLEM ORIENTED RECORD

    3 .NURSING CARE STUDIES

    4PROCESS RECORDING

    1. NURSES NOTES

    The ability to report and record nursing actions is identified as critical behavior in most nursing programs,

    yet the medium for the most of the recording and reporting, the patients chart has seldom been used in a

    systematic evaluation protocol of learner practice competence. The learner has been expected to write in

    the nurses notes .But the evaluative data about the students clinical practice performance seldom reflect

    his/her skill in recording and the quality of the substance recorded.

    The significance of the patients chart is becoming increasingly apparent as the movement to demand

    accountability for quality healthcare gains momentu .Phaneauf has devised a nursing audit protocol for

    ascertaining quality nursing care based on the use of patient charts the source of data. The chart is a

    communication instrument essential to the safety of the patient and the management of his care. It serves

    as the major means of communication between the various professionals involved in the care. It provides

    legal documentation of the care provided. Recording is the part of one of the seven major functions of

    nursing.

    2 PROBLEM ORIENTED RECORDS

    A problem oriented record is perceived as systematic record keeping centered around the patients health

    problems. It consists of the four major components

    1. Data base-all appropriate information about patient for assessing his conditions.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    14/28

    2. Problem list-listing the conditions, systems or circumstances identified from the data base, which have

    implications for the patients health. Each problem is unmerged in meta.

    3. Initial plans-diagnostic and therapeutic orders for each problem listed. Plans are keyed to each problem.

    4. Progress notes

    a) Narrative note-an expository comment relative of each problem.

    b) Flows sheets- graphic forms to record repetitive and serial data.

    c) Discharge summary follow-up organized around each problem.

    This approach to record keeping is integrative, as all professionals involved in the patients care

    participate in developing and maintaining the record. Recording is also the integrative rather than

    segregate, as in the usual form of patients charts which contain nurses notes, doctors notes, laboratory

    reports etc. The focus is the patient and his problems; his totality is maintained.

    Since, the report of actions and the thoughts behind the actions are a vital part of the record, Problemoriented records are valuable learning experience of the nursing learner.

    As with any written communication, not only the quality of the substance the student includes in the

    record, but also the communicating the massage considered in assessing the students competency with

    problem oriented recording.

    NURSING CARE STUDIES

    The nursing care study is a familiar evaluation strategy in nursing education programs, although the form

    and intent may vary considerably. Schweer defines a nursing carestudy as problem solving activity

    whereby the student under takes the comprehensive assessment of a particular patients problems leading

    to planning, implementing, and evaluating of nursing care measures.

    The students written description of actions implicit in meeting patient needs enables evaluator to

    determine ability not only in cognitive and effective domains for each step of the process but the ability to

    establish meaningful relationships among steps of the process. Skills in communication concern the

    degree to which the nurse conveys the message to the reader. This skill encompass clarity of

    terminology and composition, concisiveness of the message, and logic in ordering elements of the

    message.

    The data gathered for this recording competency may include several longitudinal studies in which the

    students recording of a patient are analyzed over a period of time, or it may represent a certain number of

    recordings of patients at a particular interval in the learning experience. The design used depends upon

    the objective of the experience.

    PROCESS RECORDING

    A procedure that has an any systematic scheme for formative evaluation is the nursing process recording

    .Shweer defines the process recording as the verbatim serial reproduction of the verbal and non verbal

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    15/28

    communications between two individuals for the purpose of assessing interactions on the continuum

    leading towards mutual understanding and relationships.

    Process recording is amenable to any interaction of the learner with another individuals, such as the

    learner and the client, the learner and client, the learner and the health team members, and between the

    learner and learner .The most frequent use for the process recording is the nurse patient relationships .The

    main four components in process recording are

    1. CLIENT COMMUNICATION

    2. NURSE COMMUNICATION

    3. NURSES INTERPRETATION OF PATIENT COMMUNICATION.

    4. IMPLICATIONS OF THE COMMUNICATION FORNURSING ACTION.

    Client communication includes a verbatim report of all verbal and nonverbal behaviors of the client .The

    nurse communication include verbatim verbal and nonverbal behaviors of the nurse, inclusive of

    conscious feelings and actions. A process recording is best used in conjunction with individual conference

    approach, so that the teacher and the learner can evaluate the total interaction as well as each of its

    component parts. It is carried out during the learning process and provides for the diagnosis and remedial

    measures.

    The total procedure is a time-consuming one and therefore the quantity per learning experience needs to

    be kept within reasonable limits. The behavioral objective must be sharply defined so that the student

    focuses the interaction. The report should be written immediately after the interaction occurs, while the

    event is vivid in the learners memory. The teachers evaluation and the conferences should be kept in

    short time (at the most one week) after the event, so the learner can use the assessment in his development

    of interpersonal relationship skills.

    ILLUSTRATION OF EVALUATION PROCESS RECORDING

    1

    1

    BEHVIORAL

    OBJECTIVES

    Encourages thepatient to express hisfears and concerns

    about his impending

    surgery.

    EVALUATION PROCEDURES

    Process recording of nurse patient

    interactionCRITERIA OREVALUATION1. Identification of patient verbal and non

    verbal cues.

    2. Identification of own verbal andnonverbal cues.3. Appropriateness of interpretation of

    patient behaviors.4. Relevancy of implications for nursing

    action to cues exhibited in the

    communications.

    Process recording ,when used with the individual conferences ,enables the learner to gain skill in

    analyzing the interaction in terms of the elements, As the skill is developed to a competency level, The

    learner becomes adept at recognizing inconsistencies and misunderstandings ,in a communication .This

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    16/28

    evaluative process is particularly effective in assisting the learner to identify his/her own patterns of

    behavior in interaction and thus to become self evaluative about his/her own interpersonal relationship

    skills.

    ORAL COMMUNICATION METHODS AS CLINICAL EVALUATION

    Nurses communicate not only through written media ,but they must be also to convey their ideas and

    thinking through the spoken words .The ability is of particular importance when presenting information or

    sharing in the decision making process with interprofessional colleagues. The usual methods are:

    1. Nursing care conferences

    2. Team conferences

    1.NURSING PATIENT CARE CONFERENCES

    Nursing care conferences taken various forms, but in general, they are problem solving group discussions

    about some facet of clinical practice. In one format, the student represents a patient situation to peer group

    for critical analysis of the plan or action or implications. The peers evaluate the actions, raise relevant

    questions and propose alternatives as appropriates. In some instances, the conferences may precede by

    nursing rounds in which participants have the opportunity to observe the patients whose nursing care will

    be discussed.

    Regardless of the format, when group conferences are used, in the evaluation scheme ,the teachers is

    concerned not only with quality of substances and skill in the use of communication technique (a s with

    the written communication methods) , but also with learners ability to use the group process. Nursing for

    the most part involves groups, and it is the essential that the behaviors relevant to individual participation

    in group process be identified and evaluated. The conference provides an excellent medium for formative

    evaluation of the student in his development in the skills in the group work.

    The nursing care conference is a valuable evaluation strategy and may be used as either formative or a

    summative evaluation procedure.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    17/28

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    18/28

    BEHAVIORAL OBVECTIVES EVALUATION PROCEDURE

    Collaborate with nursing team

    members in managerial decisions

    for a patient.

    Team conference

    Presentation to nursing team of a patient situation

    necessitating decisions for a plan for management.

    Criteria for evaluation.1. Collects data from other team members.2. Reports own observations.

    3. Shares with group in establishing relationships amongdata.

    4. Shares with group in establishing relationships among

    data.5. Provides for all members to contribute ideas tocontribute ideas relative to goals for care.

    6 .Leads groups to consensus of the goals.

    7. Listens to members suggestions for implementationstrategies.

    8. Develops plan of care for patient relevant to needs onthe basis of group consensus.

    MULTIPLE APPROACHES TO CLINICAL EVALUATION

    One of the greatest dangers in clinical evaluation is the tendency of the teacher to get into a rut with

    evaluation procedures and use the same process in each evaluation period with every student. As the

    approach becomes routinized, practice evaluation becomes an end in itself, divorced from the excitement

    of learning.

    It will be noted that five evaluation strategies for the single behavioral objective are suggested. Theteachers can vary the strategies with different groups of students, so that he/she is not confined to one

    method and thus runs the risk of becoming bored and automatic in preparation of evaluation reports.

    The suggestion of five methods is especially important now ever in enabling the teacher to individualize

    evaluation procedures. Different methods may be used with different students, according to their needs

    and the situation in which they are practicing. Another dimension of this individuality relates to the

    evaluation strategy for summative evaluation.

    Although ,educators profess a belief in individualized learning ,they generally require all the students to

    march to the same drummer as far as evaluation is concerned .A teacher who adopts a mastery of

    learning approach doesnt conclude that a student is incapable of meeting the objective on the basis of hisperformance on one evaluation strategy.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    19/28

    Behavioral objectives Evaluation methods

    Conducts purposeful interview. 1. Observation by the evaluator.

    2.Tape recording

    3.Videotaping

    4.Clinical conferenceCriteria for evaluation

    1.Clear definition

    2.Questions related to purpose3. Questions stated to elicit responses.

    4.Responses of patient consistent with scope

    5.Patient cues acknowledge6. Nurses evaluation of interview in terms of principlesof principles of interviewing.

    CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPING TOOLS FOR ASSESSING CLINICAL

    PERFORMANCE:

    Systematic study of the following four questions by nurse experts within a school of nursing will helpful

    to the way to consensus in identification of the criteria.

    1. What are the functions of the group to be evaluated? E.g. if nursing students are to be evaluated, the

    faculty members should reach agreement of clinical performance they expect of students at various stages

    in the program.

    2. What qualities (traits, abilities, or skills) that are observable and measurable, are essential to the

    effective functions of the group? Each quality selected for evaluation should be important for effective

    performance of functions and should be distinctly different from each of other qualities chose

    d from an average student, skilled student and so on. Rating scale can be a 3-point, 5-point, or 7-point

    rating scale, e,g. dependability and reliability have similar connotations .If it is agreed that the quality

    implied in these should be evaluated ,the terms of the behavior which is observable.

    3. What criteria or standards are to be used in defining level of performance in relation to each qualities to

    be evaluated?, i.e. what each of the qualities or skill encom-posses, it would be helpful to write briefly

    statements incorporating an operational definition of this quality, which will describe what experts

    consider to be satisfactory an outstanding and an unsatisfactory performance of the skill.

    4. What specific activities or behavior, appropriate to the functions of the qualities to be evaluated at

    varying levels of performances?

    Specific activities pertaining to skill or behavior patterns that are observable and measurable should be

    clearly listed out in the performance evaluation tool, e.g. rating scale.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    20/28

    RATING SCALE:

    A rating scale is a standardized method of recording, interpretation of behavior, with this technique

    students/individuals rated on scale from low to high with respect to a particular trait. The accuracy of the

    rating also depends on the extent to which the teacher understand precisely what is being rated.

    Types ofRating Scales:

    scales are as follows:

    1. Descriptive rating scale.

    2. Graphic rating scale.

    3. Rank order method.

    4. Forced choice.

    Rating scales are used in nursing education for rating of skill in performance and for rating of

    personality traits. Ideally a rating scale for performance should evolve from decisions made based on the

    criteria agreed upon by nurse experts and put in writing in relation to these criteria. Scales used for rating

    skill in performance describe behavior typical of each educational level and coding is given to quantify

    the behavior. The rating scale should contain descriptions of performance and behavior that are expect

    ale.

    Direct observation the principal tool of performance evaluation, observation, the principal tool of

    performance evaluation ,is an inherently subjective technique, and the only to the extent that subjectivity

    of direct observation is reduced can be the reliability and validity of performance evaluation increased.

    Therefore, solution to the problem of unsatisfactory evaluation is not the development of new rating

    scales but finding a means of increasing ,to the greatest extent possible, the qualities(traits, abilities or

    skills)that are observable and measurable are, therefore measurable are, therefore ,essential to effective

    evaluation of clinical performance.

    CLINICAL EVALUATION PROCESS

    Clinical evaluation is a systematic process that can be considered as having three consecutive phases (1)

    Preparation, (2) Clinical activity phases and the final data interpretation and feedback. Role ofFaculty

    Evaluator during the evaluation process

    PHASES1: PREPRATION

    Determine objectives and competencies

    Identify evaluation methods and tools

    Choose clinical site

    Orient students to the evaluation plan

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    21/28

    Focus on objectivity inn evaluation

    PHASES2:CLINICAL ACTIVITY

    Orient students and staff to the student role

    Provide students clinical opportunities

    Ensure patient safety

    Observe and collect evaluation data

    Provide student feedback to enhance learning

    Document findings, maintain privacy of records.

    Contract with students regarding any deficiencies

    PHASE3: FINAL DATA INTERPRETATION AND PRESENTATION

    Interpret data in fair , reasonable, and consistent manner

    Assign grade

    Provide summative evaluation conference (ensure privacy and respect confidentiality)

    Additional discussion of selected points in each phase follows.

    1.PREPARATION PHASE

    Choosing the clinical setting and patient assignment as a part of the evaluation process.

    Faculty are responsible for providing each student with ample opportunities to achieve course objectives

    and must give careful attention to choosing a clinical site that will give careful attention to choosing a

    clinical site that will give students these opportunities.

    Safe delivery of care with the welfare and the safety of the patients as the first priority Before the clinical

    experience begins, the faculty must develop a criteria for what is considered unsafe or inappropriate

    behavior and what consequences will occur if such behavior is observed.

    The faculty must be prepared to remove a student from the clinical setting if the student does not meet the

    minimal level of safety. Communication between faculty and the students before the clinical experience

    begins is essential. Students have the right to know the standard used for safe practice and evaluation.

    Students should also be given an orientation to the clinical facility and the policies and the procedures that

    will apply to the clinical experience. Unit orientation, as well as the orientation to evaluation methods, are

    important in decreasing the of

    Students and faculty are essential visitors in an established system, and the status of the student comfort

    and the support in the clinical environment should be considered in evaluation as well, here the

    importance of positive clinical learning environment for student learning.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    22/28

    DETERMINING THE STANDARDS AND MEASUREMENT TOOLS

    Student performance expectations should meet the following criteria

    (1)Reasonable, (2) consistent and applied equally, (3)established and communicated before

    implementation.

    Faculties have the responsibility for choosing appropriate methods and tools of evaluation of the learners

    clinical performance. These tools should be document performance expectation revelent to the course

    objectives and be practical and time efficient.

    The concepts of interratter reliability(whether results can be replicated by other raters) and content

    validity (whether a tools measure what is desired) at minimum should be considered in selection of a

    specific clinical evaluation instrument.

    2. CLINICAL ACTIVITY PHASE

    In both obtaining and analyzing clinical evaluation data, faculty needs to make professional judgment

    about the performance of students. Because of the subjective nature of evaluation, there may be concern

    that evaluation is based.

    SAMPLE OF STUDENT EVALUATION OF CLINICAL SETTING

    Name of Agency

    Specific Unit

    Direction

    Print the name of the instructor and the name of the agency, the specific unit where you had your clinical

    experience, and the days of the weeks you were assigned.

    Please respond to the following statements with the rating that best your opinion.

    A. Strongly agree

    B. Agree

    C .Disagree

    D. Strongly disagree

    Please qualify any rating of C or D with comments or suggestions. The agency personnel have asked thatyou make comments because this is what they can make improvements or know what is positive. Your

    ratings and written comments will be used to determine clinical placement for future students and Amy be

    shared with individuals in the setting but only in summary form.

    Application of course material

    1. The staff facilitated my ability to meet clinical objectives.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    23/28

    2. I was able to meet the objectives of this course in this setting.

    Population/patients

    3. Patients presented clinical problems appropriate to then objectives for this course.

    4. Culturally diverse patients (e.g. cultural, social, and economic) were available in the setting.

    HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

    5. Nurse Managers, staff nurses and support staff were accepting of students and student learning.

    6. Nurse Managers, staff nurses, and support staff were available to answer the questions and provide

    assistance.

    7. The nursing staff were positive role models.

    8. Nurses demonstrated professional relationships with other health care professionals.

    PHYSICAL ENVIORNMENT

    9. The setting was conductive to working with the patients and other health members.

    10. Space was available for conferences with faculty and other students.

    OVERALL IMPRESSION OF SETTING

    11. I have a positive impression of the quality of care provided in this setting.

    12. I would recommend this setting for future students taking this course.

    13. Add statements specific to the clinical setting not already covered.

    How could your clinical experience have been improved in this clinical setting?

    Please use the separate sheet to make comments and suggestions.

    To prevent biased judgment, faculty needs to be aware of the factors that can influence decision making

    and must actively use strategies to prevent biases. Strategies that can help support trustworthiness of the

    clinical evaluation data include the following:

    1. Have specified objectives or competencies on which to base the evaluation.

    2. Use multiple strategies and combined methods of evaluation for compiling data.

    3. Include both qualitative and quantitative measures.

    4. Determine a practical sampling plan and evaluate it over time.

    5 .Provide clear directions for tools to promote consistency between rates in collection and interpretation

    of data.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    24/28

    6. Train faculty in use of specific clinical evaluation tools and approaches for consistency and fairness in

    grading.

    7. Be aware of common errors such as halo effect (assuming that positive behaviors in one evaluated

    competency will be similar in others).

    8. Incorporate teacher self-assessment of values, beliefs or biases that might affect the evaluation process.

    3FINAL DATA INTERPRETATION AND PRESENTATION

    i)Clinical Evaluation Conference: The findings of the clinical evaluation are usually shared with the

    student individually at the end of the clinical experience or course. The timely feedback of the earier

    formative evaluation should provide students with information sufficient to prepare them for this

    evaluation. A students self evaluation is often submitted before the evaluation conference and discussed

    at this time.

    Evaluation results are commonly reported in both written and oral forms. Often, the primary evaluation

    tool is presented to show student improvement and specifically recall incidents. The faculty should be

    explained, giving specific incidents in which student had difficulties, excelled, performed adequately, or

    improved. In addition, the faculty member needs to summarize the conference and the end on a positive

    note.

    The environment in which the evaluation conference takes place should be comfortable for the student,

    and the privacy should be maintained. An hour during which the student is responsible for patient care or

    directly after a during the clinical experience is not the most conducive time for conference. An

    appointment during office hours away from clinical site provides a more comfortable and private setting

    for student to listen to constructive criticism or encouraging comments.

    ii) STUDENT RESPONSE: The students response to the faculty evaluation typically reflects the fairness

    with which the results were determined. A student will perceive the results as fair if his or her own

    appraisal is congruent with that of the faculty. A student self evaluation should be submitted before the

    conference helps the faculty time to prepare a response. However, the best way to ensure congruent

    results is for faculty to provide the student with a sufficient number of formative evaluations and time to

    reflect on his or her own performance. Faculty need to be sensitive to the students needs, emphasizing

    the students strengths, as well as weakness, and encouraging goals and aspiration.

    iii) WORKING WITH STUDENTS WITH: Questionable Performance Supporting At-Risk Students:

    Developing a positive learning environment is the basic step promoting positive supportive student s need

    to learning relationships. Students have a right to expect respect. Pointing out areas in which students

    need to improve and specific ways to achieve clinical goals promote positive learning environment and

    minimizes potential legal risks.

    Summarizes the following key points, which although relevant to evaluation, have a particular merit in

    evaluating a student with questionable clinical performance behaviors.

    1.E nsure that the criteria for student success .(i.e, the written course objectives or competency

    statements) are clear to all parties.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    25/28

    2. If a student is at risk, objectively document a pattern of marginal or failing behavior.

    3. Report poor performance to student as formative evaluation and provide students with opportunities for

    remedial work.

    4. Use strategies such as clinical probation for supporting the risk student. Student clinical contract can

    be used to document these plans for improvement. The written student contract should clarify student andfaculty expectations and what student behaviors need to occur for passing status to be achieved.

    Follow written procedure form school handbooks. Anecdotal records should be written objectively and

    used to document a pattern of behaviors.Faling behaviors need to be indentified in writing, and a contract

    for corrections should be signed by the member of faculty and the student. An annotated record of each

    counseling session and student evaluation should be signed by both of the student and the faculty member

    and maintained by the faculty member.

    iv)UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE :It should be noted that when a student given a failing grade,

    faculty must be aware of the standards to meet , that grades must not be arbitrary or capricious, and that

    faculty must be able to explain how the grades are determined related the program or the course ofobjective. When a fair judgment is made that a students performance is unsatisfactory or failing,

    strategies should be used to avert interpersonal or legal problems. As soon as the decisions made,

    communication with student is essential. Documentation from formative evaluation conferences and

    student contracts can provide support for the decision. Published school policies and procedures should

    be followed, including documentation that decisions were made carefully and deliberately. Support from

    the university or college is essential when performance is determined to be unsatisfactory, and the

    administration should be notified of impending problems early in the grading process.

    Final evaluations that result in unsatisfactory or failing performance require special tact and concern.

    Faculty need to share specific findings that resulted in a student not meeting the expected clinical

    objectives. Student contracts not fulfilled need to be identified. Students need time to process theinformation and should not feel rushed. Faculty need to listen attentively, with a strong show of concern

    and support, to the students perceptions. The student may need time to reflect and return for another

    conference after adjusting to the facts.

    V) STUDENT REACTIONS: The failing student may react in variety of ways. Caring faculty will

    recognize these behaviors and provide empathetic support. Students may respond with denial, providing

    their own perception of how a specified incident did or did not occur and offering excuses. Faculty need

    to steer the conversation to the students not meeting the objectives and provide support for the students

    emotional needs. A student may attempt to bargain for passing grade. Faculty can be prepared to provide

    information about options the student has. As the reality of the loss is recognized, the student may

    respond with depression, confusion, lack of motivation, indecision, and tears. Faculty should provide

    support, listen attentively, and generally convey caring behaviors; in some cases faculty may also need to

    recommend professional counseling. The student may come in terms with the outcome and begin to make

    plans for the future. Assistance from the faculty about options is often sought by the student. How well

    the student adapts to the final evaluation typically depends on how well she or she has been prepared for

    the results.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    26/28

    The student may respond with anger. The student may become demanding or accusing and may have the

    potential to become violent. In this case, faculty needs to take steps to ensure their own safety and that of

    the student. Faculty should not take the anger personally but guidance about feelings and focus on the

    anger as a part of loss. Students recommended handling anger with a professional deep breath.

    Additionally, an established grievance policy should be available. Both utilizing students and faculty

    share responsibility for knowing about and appropriately utilizing such policy. Students have a right to

    respond to charges against them.

    I) DISMISSING AN UNSAFE STUDENT FROM CLINICAL PRATICE: Behaviors unsafe for patient

    care such as lack of preparation, violence, and substance abuse need to be addressed. It should be noted

    the importance of a broad and through policy that allows for safe and appropriate actions to protect the

    patient and the student. School policies and procedures need to be followed .Clear policies help prevent

    arbitrary or capricious responses to an incident. Summarizes key points related to the students who is

    unsafe to clear for patients, noting the faculty have an obligation to ensure that all students are returned to

    an area of safety as well. The student unprepared to care for an assigned clinical practice should include a

    review of relevant policies and clarification of professional students behaviors.

    After the final student conference, the student and faculty need to evaluate the entire experience as a

    whole. The clinical site is evaluated on how well it is met the learning and the practice needs of the

    students. Was the philosophy of the staff congruent with that of the faculty and students? Where the

    students are given the opportunity to meet all the objectives? As these questions are answered, the

    preparation phase of evaluation begins again. A continuous quality improvement process for clinical

    evaluation should be considered, with attention given to the structure (appropriate evaluation tools with

    appropriate clinical environment and patient care opportunities), process (appropriate plans for sampling

    and evaluating clinical behaviors and for sharing feedback and results of evaluation), and outcome

    (satisfactory evaluative outcome indicating safe competent graduates).

    ASSESSING CLINICAL PERFORMANCE

    Education is a major process, the chief goal of which is to bring changes in human behavior .Nursing has

    a practical component which is integral to its educational process. A major focus of education today is

    the responsibility of the educational institutions to produce graduates who can perform in real life

    situations because education in nursing without application is meaningless.

    There are four stages that can be identified in the development of any educational

    Program, i.e. formulation of objectives, selection of learning activities, organizations of learning

    experiences and evaluation. Evaluation involves judging the worth of an experiences, ideas or process.

    Evaluation is the process of determining the degree of changes in the behavior of students because the

    overall aim of educational objectives is to produce certain desirable changes in behavior pattern of the

    student.Evaluation is the process of determining to what extent the educational objectives are being

    realized.

    The progress of the students can be assessed / determined by measuring the change in

    their behavior. This is measured by comparing the behavior of students before beginning of any

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    27/28

    experience and its completion, the following possibilities might be there:1.Objectives might be

    inappropriate ,unclear and unachievable.

    2. Learning experiences might not be relevant to the objectives.

    3. The organization of learning experiences may not be appropriates.

    4. The evaluation methods may be faulty.

    Evaluating students clinical performance is one of the challenging responsibilities a nursing

    instructor can have. When observing for students performance if the instructor looks certain behaviors

    she considers important for successful performance and if these are absent she may give the student

    unsatisfactory report about her performance, thus bringing in subjectivity into the evaluation. In view of

    the complex nature of nursing practice a variety of tools is needed to evaluate clinical performance.

    Further these tools must possess a high degree of objectivity, validity, reliability and practicability in

    order to appraise the quality of students clinical performance. While developing such tools we should

    identify the objectives and situation as given below:

    IDENTIFICATION AND DEFINING OF OBJECTIVES:

    While selecting and defining objectives, consideration must be given to the levels of students abilities,

    the length of experience and adequacy of facilities under which experiences occurs. For evaluation to be

    effective and consistent all who are involved in the process of evaluation, must have not only a clear out

    understanding of the instructional objectives that are defined in terms of observable students behavior but

    also an adequate preparation in technique and skill in evaluation.

    IDENTIFICATION OF SITUATIONS:

    The next step in the task of evaluation is to identify and arrange situations or learning an experience in

    which student has an opportunity to display the specific behavior to be evaluated.

    The techniques /tools used for evaluation are means for collecting evidence about students

    development in desired directions. These tools therefore should be valid, reliable, objective, and

    practicable.

    A variety of tools and techniques can be used to assess students performance in the clinical

    area. Some of these which are commonly used are anecdotes checklist, rating scale, nursing care plans,

    nursing records, conferences, etc. Most of these involve direct observation is especially vulnerable, to

    subjective to make observation in various situation. The instructor must make a special effort to view and

    record the situation as it is in its actuality. Anecdotal records and checklist are quite helpful in this.

    The rating scale helps to ascribe quantitative and qualitative value to students performance.

    It must be subjected to the tests of validity, realibility and usability to determine its value. The final step

    in the task of evaluation is to administer tool that has been developed and appraise its validity, reliability

    and practibility.

  • 8/2/2019 Anjus Evaluation in Clinical Practice

    28/28

    CONCLUSION

    A teacher who adopts a mastery of learning approach does not conclude that a student is incapable of

    meeting the objective on the basis of his performance on one evaluation strategy. A mastery of learning

    teacher would select another evaluation procedure before drawing such a conclusion. The suggestion here

    is that teachers recognize the complex nature of practice complex nature of practice and accordingly

    diversity their evaluation strategies so that the learner and teacher engage in a developmental rather than a

    controlling process.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1.Basvanthappa B.T, Nursing Education, Second Edition 2009, Published by Jaypee

    Brothers, Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, Page no:701-743.

    2.Ezhilarasu Punitha, Indian Journal of continuining nursing education, Volume 09 (1)

    January June 2008. Page no.2-3.

    3.Neeraja K.P, Text book of nursing education, first edition:2003, Published by Jaypee

    Brothers (p) Ltd, Page no:231-250.

    4. Shankaranarayan B. Sindhu B., Learning and Teaching Nursing, Second Edition

    Published by Brain fill Calicut, Page no:101,162-172.

    5.Lynne E. Young Barbara L. Paterson, Teaching Nursing, developing a student centered

    Student centered learning environment, Published by Lippincott Wilkins copyright

    2007, Page no.12,32,165,585.


Recommended