ANKC Lure Coursing Working Partyankc.org.au/media/9261/4-attachment-5c.docx · Web viewAligns...

2019 LURE COURSING MTG – ATTACHMENT 5c

AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL KENNEL COUNCIL LTD

Rules for the conduct ofLure Coursing Trials

(NSW) Rules for the conduct of Lure Coursing Meets(NSW) Rationale –To use a collective noun that covers both Tests and Trials.

(Effective from 1st October 2016)

Approved by the Australian National Kennel Council Ltd 2014

Amended08/1710/17

1


Adopted by the Member Bodies of theAustralian National Kennel Council Ltd

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORYDogs ACTPO Box 815DICKSON ACT 2602Phone: (02) 6241 4404 Fax: (02) 6241 1129Email: [email protected]

WESTERN AUSTRALIADogs WestCnr Ranford & Warton RoadsSOUTHERN RIVER WA 6110Phone: (08) 9455 1188 Fax: (08) 9455 1190Email: [email protected]

QUEENSLANDDogs QueenslandPO Box 495FORTITUDE VALLEY QLD 4006Phone: (07) 3252 2661 Fax: (07) 3252 3864Email: [email protected]

NORTHERN TERRITORYDogs NTPO Box 37521WINNELLIE NT 0821Phone: (08) 8984 3570 Fax: (08) 8984 3409Email: [email protected]

NEW SOUTH WALESDogs NSWPO Box 632ST MARYS NSW 1790Phone: (02) 9834 3022 Fax: (02) 9834 3872Email: [email protected]

SOUTH AUSTRALIADogs SAPO Box 844PROSPECT EAST SA 5082Phone: (08) 8349 4797 Fax: (08) 8262 5751Email: [email protected]

TASMANIADogs TasmaniaPO Box 116GLENORCHY TAS 7010Phone: (03) 6272 9443 Fax: (03) 6273 0844Email: [email protected]

VICTORIADogs VictoriaLocked Bag K9CRANBOURNE VIC 3977Phone: (03) 9788 2500 Fax: (03) 9788 2599Email: [email protected]

2


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction............................................................................................................................. 4

2. Decisions................................................................................................................................. 4

3. Purpose of Lure Coursing.......................................................................................................4

(NSW) Insert new sections

3A Field and Equipment3A.1 Field3A.2 Length3A.3 Layout3A.4 Equipment

Rationale explained under rule change

4. Lure Coursing Tests and Trials Explained...............................................................................54.1 Junior Coursing Tests.................................................................................................54.2 Coursing Ability Test (CAT)........................................................................................54.3 Lure Coursing Trials...................................................................................................5

5. Eligibility for Dogs.................................................................................................................... 5

6. Eligibility for Entering a Lure Coursing Meet...........................................................................6

7. Disqualifications...................................................................................................................... 6(NSW) Amend to read7. Disqualifications ...................................................................................................................... 67. Awarded Penalties (NSW) Rationale Table of ContentsAlign with name change of section

8. Lure Coursing Titles and Awards............................................................................................78.1 Sighthounds and Eligible Breeds................................................................................78.2 Titles for All Other Breeds..........................................................................................9

9. Officials................................................................................................................................... 99.2 Race Secretary...........................................................................................................99.3 Gate Steward...........................................................................................................109.3 Huntmaster...............................................................................................................109.5 Lure Operator...........................................................................................................11

(NSW) Amend to read:

9. Officials................................................................................................................................... 99.2 Race Trial Secretary..................................................................................................99.3 Gate Steward...........................................................................................................109.4 Huntmaster...............................................................................................................109.5 Lure Operator...........................................................................................................11

(NSW) Rationale Table of contents. Align with name change of section

10. Running the Meet.................................................................................................................. 1210.1 Order of Running......................................................................................................12

3


10.8 In the event of a tie for Best of Breed.......................................................................1210.9 Best in Field..............................................................................................................12

11. Judging................................................................................................................................. 12

12. Lure Coursing Judges...........................................................................................................14(NSW) Proposed change Table of Contents12. Lure Coursing Judges ...........................................................................................................14(NSW) Rationale Table of ContentsRemove as Lure Coursing Judges has been moved to Regulations

13. Glossary of Terms.................................................................................................................15(NSW) Proposed change Table of Contents13. 12. Glossary of Terms.................................................................................................................15(NSW) Rationale Table of ContentsRenumber

Appendices1. Beginner Lure Coursing Progression....................................................................................162. Sighthound Title Progression................................................................................................173. CAT Title Progression...........................................................................................................18

4


1. INTRODUCTION

Where referred to in the Rules, the words

1.1 Member Body shall mean the Member Body in each State or Territory of Australia.

1.2 Affiliate shall mean an affiliated member body of Member Body conducting Lure Coursing Trials and Tests.

1.3 These Rules are binding on Member Bodies of the ANKC Ltd.

1.4 Interpretation of these Rules should not be necessary; however, should there be a need for individuals to seek clarification, application must be made by the Member Body to the ANKC, whose decision shall be binding.

2. DECISIONS

2.1 The Member Body at its discretion, may grant permission to an Affiliate to hold Lure Coursing Tests and Trials and they are to be conducted in accordance with the Rules set down by the Member Body and applicable ANKC authorised Rules.

2.2 Decisions of the Committee of the Affiliate conducting a trial shall be subject to appeal to the Member Body in the State or Territory in which the Trial is conducted.

(NSW) Amend to read:2.2 Decisions of the Committee of the Affiliate conducting test and/or trial shall be subject to

appeal to the Member Body in the State or Territory in which the Trial is conducted.

(NSW) Rationale: align with other rules

2.3 The Rules of the Member Body shall apply to all Lure Coursing Tests or Trials and, to any Affiliate conducting Lure Coursing Tests or Trials and in the event of any inconsistency, the Rules of the Member Body shall prevail.

2.4 Anyone taking part in a Lure Coursing Test or Trial that openly impugns the actions or decisions of the Judge shall render himself liable to be debarred from further participation in the Test or Trial, and may be ordered from the grounds and further dealt with at the discretion of the Member Body.


2.4 Anyone taking part in a Lure Coursing Test or Trial that openly impugns the actions or decisions of the Judge shall render himself themselves liable to be debarred from further participation in the Test or Trial, and may be ordered from the grounds and further dealt with at the discretion of the Member Body.

(NSW) Rationale: Use of gender-neutral terms

2.5 Any person participating in any form of Lure Coursing competition does so at their own risk and no Member Body or Affiliate shall be responsible for any injury or damage to any person, dog or property.


2.5 Any person participating in any form of Lure Coursing competition Meet does so at their own risk and no Member Body or Affiliate shall be responsible for any injury or damage to any person, dog or property.

(NSW) Rationale: Expand liability clause to all ANKC/CC sanctioned events, not just “competitions”.

5


2.6 Lure Coursing tests and trials are sports, and all participants must be guided by the principles of good sportsmanship both on and off the field.

3. PURPOSE OF LURE COURSING

3.1 The purpose of Lure Coursing events is to preserve and develop the coursing skills inherent in hounds, specifically Sighthounds, and to demonstrate their ability to perform the function for which they were originally bred. Lure Coursing is an artificial simulation of the way a hare might run in the open field, with the course pattern being irregular and varied with every meet. The lure is strips of plastic bags tied to a nylon cord which is pulled around on pulleys by a battery operated motor. A normal course is between 650 metres to 800 or 900 metres long; however course lengths can vary dependent on field conditions on the day.


3.1 The purpose of Lure Coursing events is to preserve and develop test and help conserve the coursing skills inherent in hounds, functional ability of specifically Sighthounds. Lure Coursing is an artificial simulation of the way a hare or rabbit might run in the open field, with the course pattern being irregular and varied with every meet. The lure is strips of white plastic or plastic bags tied to a nylon cord which is pulled around on pulleys by a battery operated motor motorized equipment.

(NSW) Rationale: The existing purpose statement contains material about the field and equipment that has been unclear to administer. For example, it describes course length in a way that is unenforceable. We recommend that the field and equipment requirements be set out separately for ease of administration. Further, amendments have been made to the purpose to clarify that the sport is a functional test for Sighthounds, and to clarify that the rules only address lure coursing, and not any other kind of coursing.

3.2 The objective is to test a dog’s ability to course without showing signs of undue stress or lack of fitness. Coursing places a considerable amount of load on many aspects on a dog’s physical structure and temperament characteristics. The sport is a test as to the physical capabilities of the dog.

(NSW) Delete and replace

3.2 The objective is to test a dog’s ability to course without showing signs of undue stress or lack of fitness. Coursing places a considerable amount of load on many aspects on a dog’s physical structure and temperament characteristics. The sport is a test as to the physical capabilities of the dog.

3.2 Lure coursing is a test of the dog’s ability to work by sight. It tests the dog’s instinct, physical structure and temperament. Judges assess the capabilities of the dog by observing the dog’s agility, enthusiasm, endurance, speed and follow through the course. The sport is not a test of scenting ability or trainability.

(NSW) Rationale: As for 3.1

(NSW) Insert new Sections

3A – FIELD AND EQUIPMENT

3A1 – Field

A large paddock is an ideal coursing field. Slightly sloping or somewhat hilly terrain is appropriate, providing that the full course can be seen by dogs, lure operator and judges. A few bushes as well as some trees are appropriate as long as they do not constitute any danger to the dogs. The ground must be free from holes. Artificial obstacles must not be

6


introduced. Any natural or fixed obstacle must be clearly visible from the dogs' viewpoint from a distance of at least 30 metres, particularly when there are depressions in the ground.

3A.2 - Length

The course must be between 600 metres to 1000 metres long, unless a shorter course is later approved as a contingency. A single course must be used for the entire meet unless equipment failure or field conditions on the day otherwise require. The course must be measured by measuring wheel or GPS based app under the supervision of the judge/s and course length recorded in the meet report.

Course lengths may vary dependent on field and weather conditions on the day; should a course need to be shortened below 600 metres to account for field or weather conditions, approval of both judge/s must be sought and received. Any decision to shorten the length of the course must be recorded in the meet report. A planned field being too small or planned equipment being inadequate to cover course length is not sufficient reason to run a shorter course. Shorter courses are only to be used as a contingency.

3A.3 - Layout

The affiliate is responsible for course design and the laying of the course. The affiliate may assign this responsibility at its discretion.

The whole course must be clearly visible and free from any danger. Course layouts must contain turns in both directions and straight sections that reveal the dogs’ lure coursing capabilities. The lure line must be positioned to minimise the risk of dogs becoming entangled by the line.

3A.4 – Equipment

Lure Coursing tests the willingness and ability of a dog to follow by sight. It is not a test of scenting ability and therefore only plastic lures made of white, unscented plastic bags or strips of predominantly white plastic are permitted. Any other object is prohibited on the line.

The lure machine may be either petrol driven or electric. It must be capable of running for a full meet, in all conditions, without breaking down or overheating.

The organizer is responsible for providing back up event equipment in order to guarantee a trouble-free competition.

(NSW) Rationale: Separate provisions for Field and Equipment for Ease of Administration.

7


4. LURE COURSING TESTS AND TRIALS EXPLAINED

Sanctioned Lure Coursing Tests and Trials are informal events run by an Affiliate after obtaining the sanction of the Member Body, at which all dogs may participate, but may not automatically accrue points for titles.


Sanctioned Lure Coursing Tests and Trials are informal formal events run by an Affiliate after obtaining the sanction of the Member Body, at which all dogs may participate, but may not automatically accrue points for titles.

(NSW) Rationale: Correction to statement that Tests and Trials are informal events. They are formal events as they result in title qualifications.

4.1 Junior Coursing Tests are non-competitive events where dogs run on an individual basis and are judged on their ability to follow a lure. All dogs must qualify with a minimum of two JC Passes to be eligible to compete in the competitive Lure Coursing Trials and Coursing Ability Test (CAT). Dogs who possess two JC passes are eligible to apply for the title Junior Courser (JC). (Amended EM#138, 07/16)


4.1 Junior Coursing Tests are non-competitive events where dogs run on an individual basis and are judged on their ability to follow a lure the scoring criteria outlined at XX. The judge assesses whether the dog possesses the necessary instinct and ability to lure course. The dogs are not scored, but rather the judge decides on a pass or fail and provides comments on the dog’s attributes against the five scoring criteria. All dogs must qualify with a minimum of two JC Passes to be eligible to compete in Lure Coursing Trials and Coursing Ability Tests (CAT). Dogs who possess two JC passes are eligible to apply for the title Junior Courser (JC).

(NSW) Rationale: NSW proposes removing the reference to non-competitive event and to instead remove the points system and replace with a system that is in line with other ANKC instinct tests. That is, the judge assesses a pass or fail, and comments on the dog’s abilities under the 5 scoring criteria.

4.2 Coursing Ability Test (CAT) serves as in introduction to the sport of Lure Coursing for all eligible dogs. Dogs run singularly and are required to complete their course with enthusiasm and without interruption and gain Passes towards titles.


4.2 Coursing Ability Test (CAT) serves as in introduction to the sport of Lure Coursing for all eligible dogs is a test for non-sighthounds where the dogs run singly. Dogs run singularly and are required to complete their course with enthusiasm and without interruption and gain passes towards titles in are judged in accordance with the scoring criteria for Lure Coursing. Qualifying passes toward titles are earned by dogs competing in these tests.

(NSW) Rationale: Clarification of eligibility for CAT stream. Reference to scoring criteria and qualifying passes.

5. ELIGIBILITY FOR DOGS

8


5.1 Junior Coursing Tests and Coursing Ability Tests shall be open to eligible dog breeds 12 months of age or older on the day of the meet. All dogs eligible to participate may apply for the title “Junior Courser (JC)” when they have achieved two JC passes. (Amended EM#138, 07/16)


5.1 Junior Coursing Tests and Coursing Ability Tests shall be open to eligible dog dogs breeds 18 months of age or older on the day of the meet. All dogs eligible to participate may apply for the title “Junior Courser (JC)” when they have achieved two JC passes. (Amended EM#138, 07/16)

(NSW) Rationale: NSW proposes increasing the minimum age of participation to 18 months to ensure that all dogs are sufficiently physically mature to withstand the demands of the sport without injury. As JC is the entry level to the sport, reference to Coursing Ability Tests would become superfluous if this proposal is adopted. The average age for growth plate closure in dogs is 14 months, though there is some variance by breed. Setting the minimum age at 18 months ensures all dogs would be sufficiently mature and aligns with the minimum commencement age for Agility competition.

5.2 Lure Coursing Trials shall be open to eligible dog breeds 18 months of age or older on the day of the meet. Dogs may compete as single competitors on a course or as pairs or trios, with dogs running in the Single Stakes receiving a different title denoted by a prefix of a lowercase ‘s’.

(NSW) Delete this section and renumber remainder of Section 5.

(NSW) Rationale: superseded by change to minimum entry age in revised section 5.1

5.3

(5.2) Sighthound breeds registered with the Member Body, and are eligible to participate in Lure Coursing Trials may earn titles [of Singles Field Champion (sFCH), Singles Lure Courser of Merit (sLCM), Singles Lure Courser Excellent (sLCX) Field Champion (FCH), Lure Courser of Merit (LCM), Lure Courser Excellent (LCX), Veteran Field Champion (vFCH), Veteran Lure Courser of Merit (vLCM), and Veteran Lure Courser Excellent (vLCX)] are the Afghan Hound, Azawakh, Borzoi, Greyhound, Ibizan Hound, Irish Wolfhound, Pharaoh Hound, Saluki, Deerhound, Sloughi, Whippet, and Italian Greyhound.

(NSW) Renumber and amend Section to read:

5.2 Sighthound breeds registered with the Member Body, and are eligible to participate in The following breeds are considered sighthounds for the purposes of Lure Coursing Trials may earn titles [of Singles Field Champion (sFCH), Singles Lure Courser of Merit (sLCM), Singles Lure Courser Excellent (sLCX) Field Champion (FCH), Lure Courser of Merit (LCM), Lure Courser Excellent (LCX), Veteran Field Champion (vFCH), Veteran Lure Courser of Merit (vLCM), and Veteran Lure Courser Excellent (vLCX)] are the Afghan Hound, Azawakh, Borzoi, Greyhound, Ibizan Hound, Irish Wolfhound, Pharaoh Hound, Saluki, Deerhound, Sloughi, Whippet, and Italian Greyhound. These breeds may earn the titles of Singles Field Champion (sFCH), Singles Lure Courser of Merit (sLCM), Singles Lure Courser Excellent (sLCX) Field Champion (FCH), Lure Courser of Merit (LCM), Lure Courser Excellent (LCX), Veteran Field Champion (vFCH), Veteran Lure Courser of Merit (vLCM), and Veteran Lure Courser Excellent (vLCX).

(NSW) Rationale: NSW considers that the sentence in the existing rules is unwieldy and difficult to read. It has been re-drafted for ease of administration.

5.4

9


(5.3) Though not recognised Sighthounds in Australia, Rhodesian Ridgebacks and Basenjis are considered as eligible breeds for the purposes of Lure Coursing and will be eligible for the Sighthound titles.

(NSW) Change section number and amend as follows:

5.3 Though not recognised Sighthounds in Australia, Rhodesian Ridgebacks and Basenjis are considered as eligible breeds for the purposes of Lure Coursing trials and shall be eligible for the Sighthound titles.

(NSW) Rationale: alignment of wording with previous section.

* (NSW) The Working Party received a submission to designate the three varieties of Portuguese Podengo as Sighthounds for the purpose of Lure Coursing. The working party considers the designation of any breed as a Sighthound is more appropriately a matter for the ANKC Breed Standards Co-ordination Group (BSCG)and in that the Dogs NSW Board forward this submission to the ANKC for consideration by the BSCG. Noting that we do not have any varieties of Portuguese Podengos competing in NSW, we are not able to comment on whether the running style of the three varieties is commensurate with that of Sighthounds. The request for advice will ask that the BSCG consider:

Each of the three varieties of the Portuguese Podengo separately in their determination. Available information on the usual prey and manner of hunting of each of those varieties. The views of the recognised Country of Origin Kennel Club, in this case, the Clube

Português de Canicultura.

5.5 As other Sighthound breeds become recognised by the ANKC, these may be added to the list of eligible breeds.

(NSW) Delete this section

(NSW) Rationale: Would be addressed by amendments to sections 5.3 and 5.4.

5.6 All other dogs registered with the Member Body are eligible to participate in Coursing Ability Tests (CAT) and earn the titles of CA (Coursing Ability), CAA (Coursing Ability Advanced), and (CAX) Coursing Ability Excellent.

5.7 Any dog with ANKC Ltd registration shall be eligible to compete in Lure Coursing tests and trials.


5.7 Any dog with ANKC Ltd registration shall be eligible to compete in Lure Coursing tests and trials provided it is sound enough to compete. Dogs with fewer than four entire legs shall be considered lame or unsound and therefore ineligible to participate.

(NSW) Rationale: NSW considers that three legged dogs should not participate in lure coursing events. These dogs face considerable stresses on their existing legs and should be considered by definition unsound for the purposes of lure coursing, as they are by the American Sighthound Field Association.

6. ELIGIBILITY FOR ENTERING A LURE COURSING MEET

6.1 To compete at judged Lure Coursing Meets, owners of competing dogs must be current financial members in good standing of the Member Body.


10


6.1 To compete at judged Lure Coursing Meets, Lure Coursing Trials & Tests, owners of competing dogs must be current financial members in good standing of the Member Body.

(NSW) Rationale: requires members not be subject to any suspensions and in good standing with member body. Aligns wording with previous submissions and removes the word “judged” as it is unnecessary.

6.2 The owner entering a dog in a Lure Coursing Test or Trial does so at their own risk. The owner agrees to abide by the rules of the Member Body. if a dog has more than one owner, permission must be granted in writing by all owners before entering a dog in a meet.

(NSW) Insert new rule 6.3

6.3 Owners of dogs must apply for pre-requisite titles before entering their dogs in a higher class.

(NSW) Rationale: Makes explicit the requirement for titles to be applied for before competition at the higher level.

6.4 Entry fees shall be fixed by the affiliate and shall not be refunded. In such cases where dogs are scratched from the field for the following reasons:

6.4.1 Dogs determined to be lame at the time of roll call shall be disqualified from competition and their entry fee will not be refunded.

(NSW) Amend section to read:

6.4.1 Dogs determined to be lame at the time of roll call check in shall be disqualified from competition ineligible to compete or otherwise unfit to run by the Huntmaster or a Judge scheduled for the day’s Meet shall be disqualified from competition and their entry fee will not be refunded. Where a club employs the services of a qualified Veterinarian to conduct vet checks, the Committee may disqualify a dog from competition on the basis of advice from the Veterinarian.

(NSW) Rationale: The term “check in” is more commonly used in dog sports. Dogs are often not present at check in and where vet checks are conducted they are generally only conducted on bitches in season. Therefore, there is generally no opportunity to determine if dogs are lame at roll call. NSW proposes amendments that make it clear which officials can make the determination that a dog is lame and under what circumstances.

6.4.2 Females in season showing a discharge characteristic of being in season shall not be eligible to compete in Lure Coursing tests and trials.

6.4.3 Notification to the Field Secretary of females in season must be made before roll call or prior to the event.

6.4.4 Females known to be in season should not be brought onto the trial grounds.

6.5 If substitutions for dogs are allowed after the closing date, this must be stated in the schedule. Substitutions will only be accepted up to and no later than one week prior to the day of the event, at the discretion of the Race Secretary.

(NSW) Delete this section

(NSW) Rationale: aligns practices with shows and other dog sports where entries at the time of closing are final. Assists trial secretaries with time to prepare final catalogues.

6.6 Amendments to these Regulations may be made from time to time by the ANKC.

11


7. DISQUALIFICATIONS

(NSW) Amend to rename.

7. DISQUALIFICATIONS7. Awarded Penalties (NSW) Rationale: To avoid confusion with disqualification mentioned elsewhere throughout the document and enable disqualification to be clearly defined

7.1 The wearing of muzzles is not compulsory; however, hounds that have been disqualified for interfering with other hounds or aggression towards another hound whilst coursing shall wear a muzzle at all times on the field.


7.1 The wearing of muzzles is not compulsory; however, hounds that have been dismissed for interference or disqualified for aggression towards another hound whilst coursing shall wear a muzzle at all times on the field.

(NSW) Rationale: This amendment makes it clear that dogs who have a history of interference with other dogs on the field must also be muzzled. The rationale for this is that an episode of interference may result in a more serious incident.

7.2 A dismissal means that a dog is unable to continue running for the rest of the meet, whereas an excusal allows a dog to complete its second run of the day.

7.3 A dog’s privilege to compete at a test or trial will be withdrawn upon either a disqualification or three (3) dismissals within six (6) Lure Coursing meets. Examples of when a dog will be dismissed:

Dogs who fail to run Dogs that course other dogs rather than the lure Dogs that delay the course

(Growling and/or barking, in and of itself, do not automatically constitute grounds for dismissal)

Upon dismissal or disqualification for interfering with another dog, a dog must requalify by way of a Qualifying Course (QC) run to be eligible to compete in the Open Stakes.

(NSW Proposed changes 7.37.3 A dog’s privilege to compete at a test or trial will be withdrawn upon either a disqualification or

three (3) dismissals within six (6) Lure Coursing meets. Examples of when a dog will be dismissed:

Dogs who fail to run Dogs that course other dogs rather than the lure Dogs that leave the field .delay the course.

(Growling and/or barking, in and of itself, do not automatically constitute grounds for dismissal)

Upon dismissal or disqualification for interfering with another dog, a dog must requalify by way of a Qualifying Course (QC) run to be eligible to compete in the Open Stakes.

Dogs that have been withdrawn from competition for three dismissals may re-enter Meets after a period of six months.

(NSW) Rationale: This amendment clarifies the rules with regard to dismissal and makes it clear that a dog that leaves the field (as opposed to being challenging to retrieve) is dismissed. The

12


proposed amendment confines the section to the new definition of dismissals only and provides for opportunity to allow dogs to re-enter Meets after a sufficient period has elapsed.

7.4 When a dog is disqualified or dismissed at a meet for any other reason other than the above this shall be notified to the Member Body within seven (7) days of the meet. Examples below

Dogs who are aggressive towards another dog on or off the field. Dogs whose handler/s or owner/s interfere with the judges, officials, or another

competitor, or another person’s dog.


7.4 When a dog is disqualified or dismissed at a meet for any other reason other than the above this shall be notified to the Member Body within seven (7) days of the meet. Examples below

Dogs who are aggressive towards another dog on or off the field. Dogs whose handler/s or owner/s interfere with the judges, officials, or another

competitor, or another person’s dog. Dogs whose handlers attempt to direct them onto the lure during a course.

(NSW) Rationale: This amendment confines this section to disqualifications. It ensures all disqualifications are reported to the relevant member body. An additional section has been included to cover the behaviour of handler who attempts to control a dog while the course is in progress.

7.5 For instances of aggression, refer to the current State Body’s Aggressive Dog Policy for appropriate action.

7.6 If a dog has been disqualified for reasons of aggression, the Member Body will be informed, in writing, of the individual or individuals whose dog was disqualified and cite the reason given for the dog’s disqualification. The Member Body will also be informed in writing of serious complaints made regarding person/s who have breached Rules set down by the Member Body.

(NSW) Amend to read:7.6 If a dog has been disqualified for reasons of aggression, the Member Body will be informed,

within 7 days, in writing, of the individual or individuals whose dog was disqualified and cite the reason given for the dog’s disqualification. The Member Body will also be informed in writing of serious complaints made regarding person/s who have breached Rules set down by the Member Body.

(NSW) Rationale: Ensures there are no delays in informing Member Bodies of disqualifications for aggression.

7.7 Only after receiving written confirmation of reinstatement is received by the registered owner from Member Body will the dog be eligible to enter, and must requalify by way of a Qualifying Course (QC) run to be eligible to compete in the Open Stakes.

8. LURE COURSING TITLES AND AWARDS

An Affiliate conducting Lure Coursing Trials and Tests shall offer all of the titling classes listed below:

(NSW) Amend to add additional phrase:

An Affiliate conducting Lure Coursing Trials and Tests shall offer all of the titling classes listed below. Dogs shall not compete in any class until the application for any qualifying title is lodged with the Member Body.

13


(NSW) Rationale: As this section is concerned with Titles, NSW proposes the requirement to apply for titles be highlighted again here.

8.1 Sighthounds and Eligible Breeds

(NSW) Note proposals in each section to amend passing score in all stakes to 100.

(NSW) Rationale: Both local and international judges have noted that passing scores higher than 100 across two stakes require compression of points awarded to passing dogs that result in difficulty differentiating a ‘good’ run from an ‘excellent’ one and leading to frequent requirements for count back to determine placings.

Dogs entered in a Lure Coursing Trial shall be eligible to receive Title Certificates upon meeting the requirements set out below. Applications are to be made to the State Member Body once requirements are met. These dogs may gain Title Certificates whether competing as a single dog on the field or coursing with another dog. Please see Appendices 1-3 for Title Progression charts.

a) Junior CourserDogs who have competed in two (2) meets (two runs per meet) and scored a total of 150 points or more at both meets in which they were entered become qualified to compete in the Open, Veteran, or Singles Stakes or graduate to the Coursing Ability Test. (Amended EM#138, 07/16)

For a sighthound or other recognised breed to graduate to Open or Veteran Stakes, a QC (Qualifying Course) run is undertaken. The QC is to ensure the Junior Courser runs cleanly (does not interfere with another dog). The QC dog is an experienced dog of the same breed, or of similar running style (each dog’s owner must agree for the dogs to run together if the breeds are different). If the dog does not run cleanly, the owner may choose to run their dog in another QC run at subsequent meets (after practicing with more single JC runs), or graduate to the Singles Stakes.

(NSW) Amend section to read:a) Junior Courser

Dogs who have competed in two (2) meets (two runs per meet) and scored a total of 100 150 points or more at both meets in which they were entered become qualified at the age of 18 months or over to compete in the Open, Veteran, or Singles Stakes or graduate to the Coursing Ability Test. (Amended EM#138, 07/16)

For a sighthound Sighthound or other recognised breed to graduate to Open or Veteran Stakes, a QC (Qualifying Course) run is undertaken. The QC is to ensure the Junior Courser runs cleanly (does not interfere with another dog). The QC dog is an experienced dog of the same breed, or of similar running style (each dog’s owner must agree for the dogs to run together if the breeds are different). If the dog does not run cleanly, the owner may choose to run their dog in another QC run at subsequent meets (after practicing with more single JC runs), or graduate to the Singles Stakes.

(NSW) Rationale: amend to make the Qualifying Course a separate section 8.1(b). Amend passing criteria to reflect proposed JC passing criteria.

(NSW) New Section 8.1(b)

8.1(b) For a sighthound or other recognised breed to graduate to Open or Veteran Stakes, a QC (Qualifying Course) run shall be undertaken.

The QC is to ensure the Junior Courser runs cleanly (does not interfere with another dog). The QC dog shall be an experienced sighthound of the same breed, or of similar running style (an Open or Field Champion dog if available). If another breed is to used, each dog’s owner must agree for the dogs to run together if the breeds are

14


different). If the dog does not run cleanly, the owner may choose to run their dog in another QC run at subsequent meets.

A dog that successfully passes at QC shall be issued with a Qualifying Certificate. This Certificate shall be produced, if requested, to any Secretary who seeks to verify a dog’s eligibility to compete in an Open or Veterans stake.

All rules relating to the conduct of Lure Coursing trials apply to the conduct of both dogs in a QC.

(NSW) Rationale: Separate the requirements for QC out from the JC title and clarifies them. To codify the rules for dogs participating in Qualifying Courses to ensure that the QCs are conducted fully in accordance with the general meet rules. Ensures that Secretaries can verify the QC status of any dog.

(NSW) Insert new section for new title:

c. Senior Courser

8.1(c) To be eligible for the title of Senior Courser, 8 Passes after the award of the JC are required to be earned. Passes can only be accumulated in the Singles, Open or Veterans streams at a Trial where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 100 per Trial (two runs). To be eligible to apply for the title, passes must be given by a minimum of four different judges on 2 different fields.

(NSW) Rationale: To provide an interim more widely achievable Sighthound title between the entry level JC and the top tier Field Champion title.

(NSW) Renumber sectiond) Open Stakes

Note: Championship points towards the Field Champion title can only be accumulated within the Open Stakes. Points shall be awarded at breed level for exhibits eighteen (18) months of age. The maximum points earned at any one meet is ten (10) points.

Eligible dogs will receive:1 point for competing, plus3 points for 1st place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed2 points for 2nd place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed1 point for 3rd place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed

50 Points are required to be earned by a sighthound or eligible breed, to be eligible for the title Field Champion (FCH), as well as obtaining a minimum of one (1) First placing or two (2) Second placings. Points can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 170 per meet (two runs). Points are not transferable between Open/Field Champion/Veteran Stakes and the Singles Stakes. (Amended 08/17, EM#148)


Open Stakes Note: Championship points towards the Field Champion title can only be accumulated within the Open Stakes. Points shall be awarded at breed level for exhibits eighteen (18) months of age. The maximum points earned at any one meet is ten (10) points.

Eligible dogs will receive:1 point for competing, plus3 points for 1st place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed

15


2 points for 2nd place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed1 point for 3rd place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed

Dogs who pass and place 4 th or below receive 1 point for competing and passing.

Passes are eligible towards the Senior Courser title.

50 75 Points are required to be earned by a sighthound or eligible breed, on 4 different fields under at least 6 judges to be eligible for the title Field Champion (FCH), as well as obtaining a minimum of one (1) First placing or two (2) Second placings. Points can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 100 170 per meet (two runs). Points are not transferable between Open/Field Champion/Veteran Stakes and the Singles Stakes. (Amended 08/17, EM#148)

This stream is eligible for the Best in Field award. Refer to ss 10.10.

(NSW) Rationale: NSW proposes that the Open stream provisions be amended to ensure that the Field Champion title is accessible to high performing dogs in low numbered breeds, without being too easy to achieve for middle performing dogs in high numbered breeds. The amendments do this by lifting the score requirement to title to 75 points and allowing the award of Best in Field to accrue additional points. The Field Champion title is the pinnacle of achievement in the sport, and, similar to Champion titles in other sports, should only be awarded to dogs of outstanding achievement in the field – that is, those dogs who regularly best other dogs. Therefore, these amendments also clarify that points do not accrue for beaten dogs after the 3rd place. Additionally, to ensure that dogs demonstrate their fitness for purpose, we propose that the title requires, in addition to a first or two second places, that the qualifications must be earned on a minimum of 4 fields, under at least 6 different judges.

(NSW) Renumber section as (d)

(d)(c) Field Champion Stakes Sighthounds and eligible breeds who have gained their FCH title may be eligible to compete for the Lure Courser of Merit (LCM) title. They must have gained an additional forty (40) breed points after gaining their FCH title and have received one first or two second placings to achieve the LCM. (Amended 08/17, EM#148)

Sighthounds and eligible breeds who have gained their LCM may be eligible to compete for the Lure Courser Excellent (LCX) title. They must have gained an additional twenty-five (25) breed points after gaining their LCM title. (Amended 08/17, EM#148)

A higher numbered title will be available for every additional twenty (20) breed points (LCX2, LCX3 etc).

(NSW) Renumber section as (e)

(e) ( d) Veteran Stakes Points shall be awarded at breed level for dogs seven (7) years of age or over (excepting Irish Wolfhounds who are five (5) years or older). The maximum points earned at any one meet is ten (10) points.

Eligible dogs will receive:1 point for competing, plus3 points for 1st place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed2 points for 2nd place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed1 point for 3rd place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed

16


50 Points are required to be earned by a sighthound or eligible breed, to be eligible for the title Veteran Field Champion (vFCH). Points can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 170 per meet (two runs). Points are not transferable between Open/Field Champion/Veteran Stakes and the Singles Stakes. If a dog is part-way through their coursing career and becomes a Veteran, all points accrued in Open/Field Champion Stakes can be transferred across when the dog starts to compete in Veteran Stakes. Once enrolled in Veteran Stakes, a dog cannot transfer out.

Sighthounds and eligible breeds who have gained their vFCH title may be eligible to compete for the Veteran Lure Courser of Merit (vLCM) title. They must have gained an additional thirty (30) breed points after gaining their vFCH title and have received one first or two second placings to achieve the vLCM.

Sighthounds and eligible breeds who have gained their vLCM may be eligible to compete for the Veteran Lure Courser Excellent (vLCX) title. They must have gained an additional twenty (20) breed points after gaining their vLCM title.

A higher numbered title will be available for every additional twenty (20) breed points (vLCX2, vLCX3 etc).


Veterans Field Champion Stakes

Points shall be awarded at breed level for dogs seven (7) years of age or over (excepting Irish Wolfhounds who are five (5) years or older). The maximum points earned at any one meet is ten (10) points.

Eligible dogs will receive:

1 point for competing, plus

3 points for 1st place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed

2 points for 2nd place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed

1 point for 3rd place in breed, plus 1 point for each dog beaten in the breed

Dogs who pass and place 4 th or below receive 1 point for competing and passing.

Passes are eligible towards the SC title

40 50 Points are required to be earned by a sighthound or eligible breed, on 2 different fields under at least 4 different judges to be eligible for the title Veteran Field Champion (vFCH). Points can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 100 170 per meet (two runs). Points are not transferable between Open/Field Champion/Veteran Stakes and the Singles Stakes. If a dog is part-way through their coursing career and becomes a Veteran, all points accrued in Open/Field Champion Stakes can be transferred across when the dog starts to compete in Veteran Stakes. Once enrolled in Veteran Stakes, a dog cannot transfer out.

This stream is eligible for the Best in Field award. Refer to ss 10.10.

Sighthounds and eligible breeds who have gained their vFCH title may be eligible to compete for the Veteran Lure Courser of Merit (vLCM) title. They must have gained an additional thirty (30) 20 breed points after gaining their vFCH title and have received one first or two second placings to achieve the vLCM.

Sighthounds and eligible breeds who have gained their vLCM may be eligible to compete for the Veteran Lure Courser Excellent (vLCX) title. They must have gained an additional twenty (15) ( 20) breed points after gaining their vLCM title.

17


A higher numbered title will be available for every additional twenty (15) (20) breed points (vLCX2, vLCX3 etc).

(NSW) Rationale: Make Veterans stake passes count towards the Senior Courser title. Add reference to eligibility for Best in Field points. Lowering the points required for the vFCH title and subsequent awards will ensure that veterans are not asked to run more events than a Singles Stream dog to qualify for their title Also, these amendments clarify that points do not accrue for beaten dogs after the 3rd place and create a new section for the vFCh points stream to align the structure of the rules with the Open FCh

e) Singles Stakes Singles Stakes are for dogs that run on their own after they have qualified as a Junior Courser. Dogs running by themselves are only eligible for a Singles Field Champion title (sFCH), Singles Lure Courser of Merit (sLCM) and Singles Lure Courser Excellent (sLCX) titles. Points are not transferable between Singles Stakes and the Open/Field Champion/Veteran Stakes.

Eligible dogs will receive:1 point for competing, plus3 points for completing the course.

40 Points are required to be earned by a sighthound or eligible breed, to be eligible for the title Singles Field Champion (sFCH). Points can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 170 per meet (two runs).

Sighthounds and eligible breeds who have gained their sFCH title may be eligible to compete for the Singles Lure Courser of Merit (sLCM) title. They must have gained an additional thirty-two (32) breed points after gaining their sFCH title.

Sighthounds and eligible breeds who have gained their sLCM may be eligible to compete for the Singles Lure Courser Excellent (sLCX) title. They must have gained an additional thirty-two (32) breed points after gaining their sLCM title.

A higher numbered title will be available for every additional twenty (20) breed points (sLCX2, sLCX3 etc).


(f) (e) Singles Stakes Singles Stakes are for dogs that run on their own after they have qualified as a Junior Courser. Dogs running by themselves are only eligible for a Singles Field Champion title (sFCH), Singles Lure Courser of Merit (sLCM) and Singles Lure Courser Excellent (sLCX) titles. Points are not transferable between Singles Stakes and the Open/Field Champion/Veteran Stakes.

Eligible dogs will receive:1 point for competing, plus3 points for completing the course.

40 Points are required to be earned by a sighthound or eligible breed, to be eligible for the title Singles Field Champion (sFCH). Points can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 100 170 per meet (two runs).

Sighthounds and eligible breeds who have gained their sFCH title may be eligible to compete for the Singles Lure Courser of Merit (sLCM) title. They must have gained an additional thirty-two (32) breed points after gaining their sFCH title.

18


Sighthounds and eligible breeds who have gained their sLCM may be eligible to compete for the Singles Lure Courser Excellent (sLCX) title. They must have gained an additional thirty-two (32) breed points after gaining their sLCM title.

A higher numbered title will be available for every additional twenty (20) breed points (sLCX2, sLCX3 etc).

(NSW) Rationale: Amend passing score to 100 as per all other stakes.

8.2 Titles for All Other Breeds

8.2.1 The Coursing Ability Test (CAT) is open to all eligible dogs at least twelve (12) months of age and over, who have passed the Junior Courser runs. Dogs must complete two (2) courses at the Meet with a minimum total score of 160 points to be eligible to receive a Pass.

(NSW) Amend to read: 8.2 Titles for All Other Breeds

8.2.1 The Coursing Ability Test (CAT) is open to all eligible dogs at least twelve (12) eighteen (18) months of age and over, who have passed the Junior Courser runs. Dogs must complete two (2) courses at the Meet with a minimum total score of 100 160 points to be eligible to receive a Pass.

(NSW) Rationale: Amend in line with increased minimum entry age of 18 months and revise passing score to 100.

8.2.2 Three titles will be awarded for Dogs that pass the CAT the required number of times.

a) Coursing Ability (CA) – 10 Passes are required to be earned to be eligible for the title. Passes can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 160 per meet (two runs). Passes must be given by a minimum of three different judges.

b) Coursing Ability Advanced (CAA) 8 Passes are required to be earned to be eligible for the title. Passes can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 160 per meet (two runs). Passes must be given by a minimum of four different judges.

c) Coursing Ability Excellent (CAX) 8 Passes are required to be earned by to be eligible for the title. Passes can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 160 per meet (two runs). Passes must be given by a minimum of four different judges..

A higher numbered title will be awarded for every additional 5 passes (eg CAX2, CAX3).


8.2.2 Three titles will be awarded for Dogs that pass the CAT the required number of times. Application for the award of the previous title is a prerequisite for competition at the higher level.

a) Coursing Ability (CA) – 10 5 Passes are required to be earned to be eligible for the title. Passes can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 100 160 per meet (two runs). Passes must be given by a minimum of three different judges.

b) Coursing Ability Advanced (CAA) 8 6 Passes are required to be earned to be eligible for the title. Passes can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 100 160 per meet (two runs). Passes must be given by a minimum of four different judges.

19


c) Coursing Ability Excellent (CAX) 8 7 Passes are required to be earned by to be eligible for the title. Passes can only be accumulated at a meet where the dog has accrued a minimum total score of 100 160 per meet (two runs). Passes must be given by a minimum of four different judges..

A higher numbered title will be awarded for every additional 5 passes (eg CAX2, CAX3).

(NSW) Rationale: NSW proposes that the number of qualification passes required for the CA stream suffix titles be reduced. As the title stream is not eligible for prefix titles, and the titles are not reflective of breed function ability, we have considered submissions from CAT stream people concerned that the CA titles are not accessible except in a minority of states that run enough trials for a title to be achieved in a year. We consider that achievable titles in every state are important to build the sport. Minimum age and passing score are amended in the proposed text in line with previous proposals.

9. OFFICIALS

All Lure Coursing Field Tests and Trials shall have the following officials:

Race SecretaryGate StewardHuntmasterLure Operator

They shall be responsible for the following duties which may be delegated as appropriate.

(NSW) Amend to read: 9. OFFICIALS

All Lure Coursing Field Tests and Trials shall have the following officials:

Judge/sSecretaryGate StewardHuntmasterLure Operator

They shall be responsible for the following duties which may be delegated as appropriate.

(NSW) Rationale: Amend to add judges to the list of officials and to use the term “Secretary” to refer to the trial secretary.


9.1 Race Secretary

The Race Secretary is very similar to a conformation Show Secretary and there are certain qualifications that are required for this position.

Shall be responsible for making sure that the grounds for the meet are checked and secured, and also checks with the people responsible for all the equipment to ensure that all is in place and functioning.

Receives records and collates all entries prior to the lure coursing meet.

Shall, at their discretion, accept substitutions for dogs entered up to and no later than one week prior to the day of the event. If substitutions are allowed after the closing date, this must be stated in the Schedule.

20


Checks in all dogs that are present on the day and marks off those that are scratched or do not turn up on the day or on time on the check-in sheet.

Marks dogs who are absent at check in on the judge/s’ sheets and Gate Steward’s sheets.

Responsible for receiving and recording entry fees on the check in sheet and then to hand over all monies to the club Treasurer.

Updates the gate steward/judges sheet of those dogs that are absent.

Approves anyone who is to be allowed in the judging area other than the officials on the day (e.g. training judges).

The Race Secretary also has the authority with the approval of the committee members present on the day to dismiss from the grounds any individual who wilfully interferes with any person, dog or official. In these instances a report is to be written up and submitted to the State Member Body.

Preparation of score sheets

Distribution of Judging Sheets to Judges

Collection of completed Judging sheets

Checking and collating score sheets

From score sheets determining Best of Breeds, title eligibilities etc.

Liaises with the chief (senior) judge(s) appointed for the day immediately if there are any inconsistencies with the scoring and record all official protests on the day of the meet

Ensures a permanent record is kept of the meet for the club archives

Provides judges with a copy of a marked catalogue

Ensures all placement awards are on hand

Compiles the results of the day for the Club Secretary to submit to the Member Body, accompanied with the applicable fee payable. complete with the R10 form.

(NSW) Rationale: Remove reference to the term “Race” when referring to the Secretary. In line with the proposal above, delete the word “Race” from the heading. This amendment also clarifies the Secretary’s role in marking dogs absent, removes local administration for member body reports in the rules and requires the Secretary to provide the judge with a copy of a marked catalogue. It also removes the discretion to accept substitutions in line with our other submission.

9.2 Gate Steward

The Gate Steward is the intermediary between those competing on the field, and those waiting to enter on the field.

To give the owners ample warning to warm their dogs up for their run.

Ensures that safety precautions are observed (covered shoes for handlers, and no collars or check chains on dogs).

Notifies the Huntmaster and judge the number for the dog that is entering the field to be judged.

21


Notifies the Huntmaster and judge if a dog is being used as a pacer for an Open Stakes dog of a different breed, or is a QC test dog for a Qualifying Courser (QC) run.

Marks off each dog as it is enters the field and records those that are absent for both courses/runs of the day.

(NSW) Amend order of responsibilities of Gate Steward and amend wording as follows:

9.2 Gate Steward The Gate Steward is the intermediary between those competing on the field, and those waiting to enter on the field.

To give the owners ample warning to warm their dogs up for their run.

Ensures that safety precautions are observed (covered shoes for handlers, and no collars or check chains on dogs).

Notifies the Huntmaster and judge the number for the dog that is entering the field to be judged.

Notifies the Huntmaster and judge if a dog is being used as a pacer for an Open Stakes dog of a different breed, or is a QC test dog for a Qualifying Courser (QC) run.

Marks off each dog as it is enters the field and records those that are absent for both courses/runs of the day.

The Gate Steward controls entry to the field. The gate steward has responsibility for

Giving adequate notice to handlers that their dogs are due to run.

Notifying the Huntmaster of any absentees, scratchings or changes of running order.

Checking that each Open dog is wearing an approved blanket of correct colour.

Ensuring that each handler is wearing the correct number and that it will be visible to the Huntmaster.

Controlling the marshalling area.

Ensures that safety precautions are observed (covered shoes for handlers, no check chains on dogs).

Ensure dogs enter the field with only one item of permitted restraint attached

Marking dogs who are called absent when their course is called on the Steward’s sheet.

(NSW) Rationale: This proposal clarifies that entry to the field and the marshalling area is controlled by the gate steward. It also places responsibility for checking correct blanket allocation on the gate steward. The Gate steward is responsible for ensuring that dogs do not enter the field on check chains, and so this proposal brings the prohibition on check chains on the field into this section. The proposal also limits the restraints used on the dog to one to reduce the risk of delays and handling errors resulting in a loose dog. The concept of a “pacer dog” is removed under this proposal, as it is considered unnecessary.

9.3 Huntmaster

The Huntmaster is in control of the proceedings on the field.

Will be in complete charge of all dogs and handlers on the field

Shall call for the course to be walked and checked for hidden obstacles and holes

Shall call up each new dog as each previous dog completes their run

22


Will ensure that a handler handles one dog only in each course

Ensures that safety precautions are observed (eg covered shoes; slip lead is held correctly and maximum safety for handler and dog).

If two dogs are running together, checks the colour vests are secured and leads are in position for release and explain the release and retrieval procedures to the handlers before each dog is run.

Shall check in the following order, judge(s) ready, are lure operator and handlers ready and after affirmative answers, provides a hand signal to the lure operator to start the lure and the course is begun

Gives the signal Tally-ho” to release the dogs for each course, and “Retrieve your dogs” at the end of the course when appropriate.

Dogs should not be slipped before the sound of the “T” in “Tally-ho”. The Huntmaster shall notify the handler of the pre-slipped dog and also the judge(s) immediately after the course is complete. If the Huntmaster fails to notify the judge(s) of a pre-slip, then to all intents there has been no pre-slip, but the judge(s) shall have the prerogative to question the Huntmaster at any time if the release seems questionable. If no “Tally-ho” has been sounded, the Huntmaster can call for the lure to be stopped upon a pre-slip and restart the lure.

The Huntmaster may order a dog that fails to run at the “Tally-ho”, or returns to its handler while the course is in progress, to be immediately retrieved. The Huntmaster shall notify the judge(s) of an immediate retrieval. The judge(s) shall then check with the Huntmaster if the immediate retrieval seems questionable. In the case of a restart, it will be the judge(s) who determines whether a retrieved dog shall have a restart.


The Huntmaster is in control of the proceedings on the field and:

Will be in complete charge of all dogs and handlers on the field.

Shall call for the course to be walked by judges and lure driver and checked for hidden obstacles and holes.

Shall call up each new dog as each previous dog completes their run Shall indicate to the Gate Steward when the next dog may enter the field

Shall advise the judge/s of the number of the dogs due to run.

Shall ensure that discarded leads and collars do not interfere with the line.

(NSW) Rationale: clarifies that it is the Huntmaster that has responsibility for indicating when dogs may enter the course and for ensuring discarded leads and collars do not impede safety.

Will ensure that a handler handles one dog only in each course

Ensures that safety precautions are observed (eg covered shoes, flat collars are removed prior to running, slip lead is held correctly and maximum safety for handler and dog).

(NSW) Makes it explicit that dogs may be walked to the start line on a flat collar.

If two dogs are running together, checks the colour vests blankets are secured and leads are in position for release and explain the release and retrieval procedures to the handlers before each dog is run.

(NSW) Rationale: uses term “blanket” as provided for in revised definition.

23


Shall check in the following order, judge(s) ready, are lure operator and handlers ready and after affirmative answers, shall brief the handlers “do not release your dogs before the “T” in Tally Ho.

(NSW) Makes explicit that the term “Tally Ho” shall be used to indicate when handlers may release dogs.

Provides a hand signal to the lure operator to start the lure and the course is begun

(NSW) Continues previous dot point in new dot point.

Gives the signal Tally-ho” to release the dogs for each course, and “Retrieve your dogs” at the end of the course when appropriate.

Dogs should not be slipped before the sound of the “T” in “Tally-ho”. The Huntmaster shall notify the handler of the pre-slipped dog and also the judge(s) immediately after the course is complete. If the Huntmaster fails to notify the judge(s) of a pre-slip:, then to all intents there has been no pre-slip, but tthe judge(s) shall have the prerogative to question the Huntmaster at any time if the release seems questionable. If no “Tally-ho” has been sounded, the Huntmaster can call for the lure to be stopped upon a pre-slip and restart the lure.

The Huntmaster may order a dog that fails to run at the “Tally-ho”, or returns to its handler while the course is in progress, to be immediately retrieved. The Huntmaster shall notify the judge(s) of an immediate retrieval. The judge(s) shall then check with the Huntmaster if the immediate retrieval seems questionable. In the case of a restart, it will be the judge(s) who determines whether a retrieved dog shall have a restart.

Shall notify the judges of any occurrence that happens during the course which might be grounds for excusal, dismissal or disqualification. Appropriate action shall be taken at the sole discretion of the judge/s.

(NSW) Rationale: adds a responsibility to inform judges of on field incidents but makes it clear that any subsequent action is at the sole discretion of the judges. Removes this current responsibility from the Lure Driver, whose sole focus must be the safe driving of the lure.

Shall immediately inform handlers, when advised by the judge/s, of all dogs in a course that is called a “no course” or of dogs that are dismissed or disqualified.

(NSW) Rationale: gives responsibly to the Huntmaster for informing handlers of judge/s decisions on course. The rules are currently silent on this issue.

Shall signal the lure operator to stop the lure immediately when a dog becomes entangled in the lure line or when any other potential safety issue develops.

(NSW) Makes explicit the Huntmaster’s responsibility to inform the Lure Driver of safety issues to ensure the lure is stopped.

9.4 Lure Operator

The Lure Operator is responsible for operation of the machine that drives the lure around the course. It is beneficial to only have one Lure Operator for the meet, as it will ensure consistency for all dogs in competition.

Responsible for laying of the course, not course design.

Will make one test run of the lure before the first course is run.

Starts and stops the lure on the signal from the Huntmaster.

Will attempt to keep the lure a reasonable distance in front of the dog at all times. If there are two dogs running then the lure is to be kept in front of the lead dog. In the event the lure becomes unsighted, the lure must continue in the planned direction until completion of the course.

24


Will stop the lure on a signal from the Huntmaster or judge(s), but shall automatically stop the lure anytime a dog becomes entangled in the lure string or when a potentially dangerous situation may develop.

Shall notify the judge(s) of any occurrence that happens during the course which might be grounds for excusal, dismissal or disqualification. Appropriate action shall be at the sole discretion of the judge(s).


9.4 Lure Operator

The Lure Operator is responsible for operation of the machine that drives the lure around the course. It is beneficial to only have one Lure Operator for the meet, One Lure Operator shall drive the lure for each test and trial as it will ensure consistency for all dogs in competition . The Lure Operator

Responsible for laying of the course, not course design. Shall walk the course before the commencement of each Test or Trial

(NSW) Rationale: Ensures that each test or trial is driven by one Lure Operator ensuring consistency for dogs. Ensures Lure Operator will walk the course. Removes reference to course design as this is dealt with elsewhere.

Will make one test run of the lure before the first course is run. Where possible, a reliable coursing dog should be used to test the flow of the course.

(NSW) Rationale: includes a requirement, when possible, to test courses by having a dog test them before less experienced dogs are run.

Starts and stops the lure on the signal from the Huntmaster.

Will attempt to keep the lure a reasonable distance in front of the dog at all times. If there are two dogs running then the lure is to be kept in front of the lead dog. In the event the lure becomes unsighted, the lure must continue in the planned direction until completion of the course.

Will stop the lure on a signal from the Huntmaster or judge(s), but shall automatically stop the lure anytime a dog becomes entangled in the lure string or when a potentially dangerous situation may develop.

Shall notify the judge(s) of any occurrence that happens during the course which might be grounds for excusal, dismissal or disqualification. Appropriate action shall be at the sole discretion of the judge(s).

(NSW) Transfers responsibility for this function to the Huntmaster to ensure that the Lure Driver’s sole focus is on driving the lure.

10. RUNNING THE MEET

10.1 The order and arrangement of dogs coursing shall be determined by a random drawing by breed at the beginning of the Meet. Every entry not excused, dismissed or disqualified shall be run twice. Dogs absent at roll call or when their course is called shall be scratched.


10.1 The order and arrangement of dogs coursing in Open & Veteran Stakes (including Field Champion stakes for these classes) shall be determined by a random public drawing by breed at the beginning of the Meet. Blanket allocations shall be publically displayed at the Secretary’s tent prior to the running of stakes. Blanket colours may not be changed after the

25


public draw and blanket announcement. Every entry not excused, dismissed or disqualified shall be run twice. Dogs absent at roll call or when their course is called shall be scratched.

If, by dismissal, disqualification or withdrawal, the number of dogs in stakes become unbalanced, the judge may direct that a second random public draw be made to redistribute dogs before the commencement of the second course. On completion of any second draw, the blanket numbers for dogs are to be publicly displayed prior to the commencement of the second course. No other reassignment of blanket colours or changing of dogs between stakes is permitted.

(NSW) Rationale: NSW proposes that the rules be amended to clarify that the requirement for draws pertains only to Open and Veteran’s stakes including Field Champion Stakes for these streams. Proposed amendments also ensure the draw is done at the beginning of the meet and made public. The proposed amendments prohibit the changing of blanket colours once allocated by public draw to stop handlers or officials manipulating which dogs run together. The proposed amendments allow handlers to withdraw dogs if they are considered to be unfit to continue. Information about marking dogs absent has been deleted and moved to the section setting out Secretary and Gate Steward roles.

10.2 The draw shall be after roll call and shall be made in full public view.


10.2 The blanket draw shall be after roll call check in and shall be made in full public view.

(NSW) Rationale: Language changes to ensure consistency with other rules.

10.3 Upon request from an owner on the entry form, multiple entries from an owner shall be divided as evenly as possible between each course.

10.4 If only one dog of a breed is entered, that dog may be run with another breed if all exhibitors/owners involved agree. The dogs will be scored separately.


10.4 If only one dog of a breed is entered, that dog may be run with another breed if all exhibitors/owners handlers involved agree. The dogs will be scored separately.

(NSW) Rationale: This proposal allows permission to be granted by people in attendance at the Meet – not all owners may be present at the grounds.

10.5 A dog that is dismissed or disqualified will not be permitted to run in the second course, and will not be counted as having been in competition when calculating the points.

10.6 Dogs may be run as singles, braces or trios. Dogs shall be designated by colours according to their draw number.

1st number drawn - Yellow (placed on left)2nd number drawn - Pink (middle or on the right in braces)3rd number drawn - Blue (placed on right)

(NSW) Amend to read:10.6 Dogs may be run as singles, braces or trios. Dogs shall be designated by colours according

to their draw number.

1st number drawn - Yellow (placed on left)2nd number drawn - Pink (middle or on the right in braces)3rd number drawn - Blue (placed on right)

26


Blankets are to be provided by the competitor for dogs running in multiple dog stakes.

(NSW) Rationale: makes explicit that it is the responsibility of competitors to provide their own blankets for dogs.

10.8 Ties for Best of Breed (BOB) will be decided on a count back of scores. Whichever dog has the highest scores in the first run in the following three categories will be BOB. The first being Follow, the second Agility, the third Endurance. If all three scores are the same for the first run, the scores for the second run will be taken into consideration.

10.9 Best in Field contenders are those who have competed in Open and Field Champion Stakes only.

10.10 Best in Field does not accrue points and is an honorary title; as such, how Best in Field is awarded remains at the discretion of the individual club.


Best in Field does not accrue points and is an honorary title; as such, how Best in Field is awarded remains at the discretion of the individual club. accrues points for each dog beaten to a maximum of 10 points. Along with the first place points for its breed, the Best in Field is eligible for additional points for each dog beaten to a maximum of 10 total points for the Meet. Best in Field shall be determined on the basis of scores awarded alone and not involve run offs between Sighthounds. Eligible streams for the Best in Field award are Open, FCh, Veteran and vFCh as the streams where dogs compete against other dogs for awards. Only one Best in Field may be awarded per Meet across all four streams. Where there is a tie in scores for Best in Field, it will be awarded on a count back. Only the winner of the Best in Field award is eligible for additional points in its class.

(NSW) Rationale: For reasons of health and safety, NSW proposes that Best in Field awards be calculated on a score only basis rather than requiring additional runs to determine places. This will remove pressure on handlers to over run dogs in warmer weather and prevents unsuitable breeds having to run directly against one another, for example, Irish Wolfhounds and Italian Greyhounds. Further this arrangement creates a pathway for outstanding Sighthounds to title as a FCh in low numbered breeds.

11. JUDGING

11.1 In addition to those rules and procedures set out previously, as they relate to judges, the following shall apply.

11.1.1 Judges officiating at Lure Coursing Tests or Trials must be registered with a Member Body list of eligible judges.

11.1.2 A Club may, at their discretion, use up to three judges for any given meet.

11.1.3 If a dog owned or part-owned or leased or part-leased by a judge or immediate family of such judge, irrespective of where they are domiciled or any other person normally domiciled with the judge, is entered in a meet, the stakes at which the dog is entered are to be judged by an alternative judge.


11.1.3 If a No dog owned or part-owned or leased or part-leased by a judge or immediate family of such judge, irrespective of where they are domiciled or any other person normally domiciled with the judge, is entered in a meet, the stakes at which the dog

27


is entered are to be judged by an alternative judge. may be entered in a meet at which the judge officiates.

(NSW) Rationale: NSW considers that to prevent perceptions of bias and to avoid the need to change judges between stakes, judges’ dogs should not be entered at trials where that judge is a scheduled judge. This will improve the consistency of judging across the breeds and ensure that no dog owned by a scheduled judge at a Meet can win Best in Field.

11.1.4 No judge shall perform any other field meet duties during his/her judging assignment on the day.

11.1.5 Each and every judge, before the meet commences, shall walk the course set out.

11.1.6 While on the field during the judging assignment, no judge shall discuss anything relative to the judging assignment with any handler or owner.

11.1.7 While observing the course in progress, when two or more judges are used, the judges shall stand apart. They shall not converse during the running of the course, nor shall they discuss anything pertaining to that course, except to state “no course”, until the score sheets have been turned in to the Race Secretary.


11.1.7 While observing the course in progress, when two or more judges are used, the judges shall stand apart. They shall not converse during the running of the course, nor shall they discuss anything pertaining to that course, except to state “no course”, until the score sheets have been turned in to the Race Secretary. They shall not discuss scores or placements of dogs.

(NSW) Rationale: NSW considers that judges need to discuss disqualifications, dismissals, excusals, re-runs etc. while on the field. The proposed amendment makes it clear that scores are not to be discussed.

11.1.8 A judge shall be able to call a “no course” for any of the following reasons:

a) The dogs are interfered with or disrupted or the judge cannot fairly score the course.

b) When a segment of the lure falls off and any dog reacts to said segment, but only if the course cannot be fairly scored.

c) If a dog or dogs touch or catch the lure and, in the judge(s) opinion(s) by so doing that action causes interference with the running of the lure, it shall be declared a no-course. Any time a dog becomes entangled in the string, the judge(s) shall order the lure stopped and may declare a no course.

d) If the lure operator fails to maintain the appropriate metre limit, and the dogs become unsighted, a judge shall have the discretion to call a no-course.

11.1.9 Judges are responsible for scoring all categories in all courses, preliminaries, finals, run-offs, etc.

11.1.10 Placing of winners shall be decided on the basis of qualities evidenced by the following and shall be scored in whole numbers only and governed by the following system:

Enthusiasm — 15 PointsFollow — 15 PointsSpeed — 25 Points

28


Agility — 25 PointsEndurance — 20 PointsTotal — 100 Points

Less: Pre-slip penalty minus 1 to 10 points Less: Course delay penalty minus 1 to 10 points

When a pre-slip occurs, the judge shall levy a penalty of between 1 and 10 points for that course. The pre-slip penalty shall not be carried over in the case where a no-course is called on the course in progress.

When a course delay occurs, the judge shall levy a 1 to 10 point penalty for that course. This includes when a dog is slipped when no Tally-Ho has been sounded. The course delay penalty shall be carried over in the case where a no course is called on the course in progress and shall be cumulative in the case of repeated delays.

(NSW) Proposed Changes 11.1.10

11.1.10 Placing of winners shall be decided on the basis of qualities evidenced by the following and shall be scored in whole numbers only and governed by the following system:

Enthusiasm — 15 PointsFollow — 15 PointsSpeed — 25 PointsAgility — 25 PointsEndurance — 20 PointsTotal — 100 Points

Speed — 25 Points Agility — 25 Points Endurance — 20 Points Enthusiasm — 15 Points Follow — 15 Points Total — 100 Points

Less: Pre-slip penalty minus 1 to 10 points Less: Course delay penalty minus 1 to 10 points

When a pre-slip occurs, the judge shall levy a penalty of between 1 and 10 points for that course. The pre-slip penalty shall not be carried over in the case where a no-course is called on the course in progress.

When a course delay occurs, the judge shall levy a 1 to 10 point penalty for that course. This includes when a dog is slipped when no Tally-Ho has been sounded and dogs that avoid their handlers at the end of a run.The course delay penalty shall be carried over in the case where a no course is called on the course in progress and shall be cumulative in the case of repeated delays.

(NSW) Rationale: Amend placement system to place highest scores first in the order of list for ease of administration.

11.1.11 A judge may score some dogs in a course and re-run other dogs from the same course. At their discretion, the judge may score dogs which fail to complete the course for any reason, if a judge is able to do so. In the case where the dogs fail to run, a judge shall have the option of giving the dogs a minimum score or excuse them.


11.1.11 A judge may score some dogs in a course and re-run other dogs from the same course. At their discretion, the judge may score dogs which fail to complete the

29


course for any reason, if a judge is able to do so. In the case where the dogs fail to run, a judge shall have the option of giving the dogs a minimum score or excuse them.

(NSW) Rationale: NSW considers that dogs that fail to run should not receive any score. There is nothing in the rules as written preventing a dog that doesn’t run from passing which would clearly not be in the spirit of the rules. Excusal of these dogs also speeds up the trial and prevents dogs who are not competitive being asked to repeat mistakes.

11.1.12 Dogs may be excused from the field by a judge for thefollowing reasons:

a) Dogs who fail to run after the Tally-Ho is given, in either the first or final course.

b) Dogs that course other dogs rather than the lure.c) Dogs whose handlers or owners interfere with the judges or officials.d) Dogs who delay the course.e) Handlers who wilfully interfere with another competitor, their dog or any

official.


11.1.12 Dogs may be excused from the field by a judge for thefollowing reasons:

a) Dogs who fail to run after the Tally-Ho is given, in either the first or final course.

b) Dogs that course other dogs rather than the lure.c) Dogs whose handlers or owners interfere with the judges or officials.d) Dogs who delay the course.e) Handlers who wilfully interfere with another competitor, their dog or any

official.

(NSW) Rationale: NSW considers that items b), c) and e) are more serious events and more properly covered by the provisions for dismissal and disqualification.

11.1.13 Dogs will be dismissed from the field by the judge, for the day, for interfering (aggressively or playfully) with the course of another dog (Growling and/or barking, in and of itself, do not automatically constitute grounds for dismissal).


11.1.13 Dogs will be dismissed from the field by the judge, for the day:

for interfering (aggressively or playfully) with the course of another dog (Growling and/or barking, in and of itself, do not automatically constitute grounds for dismissal).

For invading the course at any time during the conduct of the Meet.

A dog not entered in a Test or Trial that invades the course shall be removed from the grounds immediately .

(NSW) Rationale: NSW considers that invasion of the course by an off leash dog at any time during the conduct meet should be a reason for disqualification due to the serious safety concerns associated with such an event, and the potentially adverse effect on any dog which is competing on the course at the time. Due to the seriousness of the event, NSW considers that course invasion is a practice that requires a penalty whether or not a dog is running.

30


Removal of dogs not entered from the grounds will discourage the attendance of dogs that are not competing and cannot be adequately supervised.

11.1.14 Dogs shall be disqualified by a judge, or by agreement of all judges where more than one is used, for the following reason: fighting – the aggressor is fighting in the field. In the event that more than one judge decides and not all judges disqualify a dog, this disqualification constitutes a dismissal.


11.1.14 Dogs shall be disqualified by a judge, or by agreement of all judges where more than one is used, for the following reason: fighting – the aggressor is fighting in the field. In the event that more than one judge decides and not all judges disqualify a dog, this disqualification constitutes a dismissal will be applied.

(NSW) Rationale: Reverses the result of any dispute between judges about dismissal v disqualification to allow the more serious penalty to apply. Any aggression on the field warrants the more serious penalty.

11.1.15 If a dog is excused, dismissed or disqualified, the course may be called a no-course by a judge or judges. The remaining dog or dogs may be run in a remaining course if one exists or be given the opportunity to re-run alone and be scored.

11.1.16 Judges shall immediately inform the Huntmaster when a course is called a no-course or when a dog is dismissed or disqualified.

11.1.17 Judges must state on the judges sheet the specific reason for excusal, dismissal or disqualification.

11.1.18 After a course has been judged, and marked score sheets turned over to the Race Secretary, only the judge can change his/her final score and only in the case of score-adding or blanket colour error. Changes must be initialled by the judge.


11.1.18 After a course has been judged, and marked score sheets turned over to the Race Secretary, only the judge can change his/her final score and only in the case of score-adding arithmetical or blanket colour error. Changes must be initialled by the judge.

(NSW) Rationale: In line with previous proposals, the reference to the Secretary removes the reference to Race. NSW also considers that judges changing scores should be restricted to errors of arithmetic rather than rescoring for any other reason.

11.1.19 A judge may not change his/her score or decision after a trial is concluded

11.1.20 The judge’s decision upon all matters relating to the course are final and binding.

12. GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Blanket: A colourful cloth (Pink, Yellow, Blue) worn by dogs competing in multiple dog competition.

(NSW) Amend definition to read:

Blanket: A colourful plain coloured , non-reflective vest without embellishments or identifying marks cloth (Pink Yellow, Pink, Blue) provided by the competitor and worn by dogs competing in multiple dog competition.

31


(NSW) Rationale: To align definition with rule 10.6 "the draw" colour order, ensure blanket is fitted so as not to risk entanglement and plain in colour so as dog cannot be identified by additional embellishments.

Course: Consists of 1, 2 or 3 dogs pursuing a lure of either mechanical or electrical drive over a selected course pattern.


Course: Consists of 1, 2 or 3 dogs pursuing a lure of either mechanical or electrical drive over a selected course pattern. Begins with the “Tally Ho” and ends with the retrieval of dogs.

Rationale: Provides clarification of what commences and ends a course for dogs and handlers.

Course Delay: Delays caused by dogs whose handlers delay the start of the run, dogs that break away from and avoid their handlers prior to the “Tally-ho” and dogs that avoid their handlers at the end of a run.

Decision: Any official disposition of a dog by a judge other than a score: e.g. an excusal, dismissal or disqualification.

Dismissal: A dismissal means a dog shall be unable to participate for the rest of the day.

Disqualification: Either a series of 3 dismissals (within 6 meets); or one serious incident which requires notice to the Member Body for their jurisdiction.

Excusal: Dogs removed from the field for remainder of the run in which they are competing, but may compete later in the day.

Draw: A random draw determining the order in which the dogs will run


Draw: A random draw determining the order in which the dogs will run in multiple dog stakes.

(NSW) Rationale: clarifies manner in which draw is to occur and for which stakes.

(NSW) Insert new definition

Fail to Run The description of any dog who upon “tally-ho” makes little or no attempt to pursue the lure, examples include dogs who remain standing at the start, dogs who walk or run away from the direction of the lure or that exit the field.

(NSW) Rationale: New “fail to run” definition provides guidance for the circumstances in which a judge is to excuse or dismiss a dog.

(NSW) Insert new definition.

Lure: Unscented, white plastic bags or predominately white plastic attached to the line.

(NSW) Rationale: To prescribe what can be used as a lure in ANKC events and to ensure that bags used provide maximum contrast and visible movement for the dogs.

No Course: Any course that a Judge determines cannot be judged

32


Pre-Slip: When a dog is slipped before the signal is given by the Huntmaster.


Pre-Slip: When a dog is slipped before the signal “Tally Ho” is given by the Huntmaster.

(NSW) Rationale: Clarifies what the signal is.


Meet Collective noun to describe lure coursing Tests and Trials held on a single day by an Affiliate.

(NSW) Rationale: Addition of encompassing term that triggers use of these rules.


Slip The act of a handler releasing the dog at the start of a course on the verbal signal “Tally Ho”.

(NSW) Rationale: Informs the definition “pre-slip”.


Test: Lure coursing events for the Junior Courser Qualification and the Coursing Ability Stream.

(NSW) Rationale: Clarifying term that specifies breeds eligible to enter .

Trial: Event held for the purpose of qualifying dogs to participate in Coursing Meets and includes ‘Fun Days’


Trial: Event held for the purpose of qualifying dogs to participate in Coursing Meets and includes ‘Fun Days’

Lure coursing event for ANKC registered Sighthounds and eligible breeds as specified in these rules that provides qualifying stakes.

(NSW) Rationale: Clarifies definition

33


Appendix 1: Beginner Lure Courser Progression

34

NON-SIGHTHOUND BREEDS

Graduate to CAT competition

FAIL

- Practice with more JC runs

- Retake QC run at another meet

PASS

Graduate to Open Stake competitionor

Veteran Stake competition

COMPETITVE COURSING SIGHTHOUNDS

RUN A QUALIFYING COURSE TEST

SINGLE RUNNING SIGHTHOUNDS

Graduate to Singles Stake competition

JUNIOR COURSER

PROVES A DOG CAN COURSE A LURE

MEET B:

2 X RUNS = 150 100 POINTS MINIMUM

MEET A:

2 X RUNS = 150 100 POINTS 2 X RUNS = 150 100 POINTS MINIMUM


(NSW) Proposed changes, Appendix 1

(NSW) Rationale changes , Appendix 1To provide a clearer understanding of the Lure Coursing progression path for beginners, by including the age requirements and align with proposed new rule 5. Eligibility of dogs. Clarify that eligible dogs may enter Singles Stakes if fail QC

Appendix 1: Beginner Lure Courser Progression

35

NON-SIGHTHOUND BREEDSDog ages 18 months or over

Graduate toCAT competition

FAIL

- Practice with more JC runs- Enter Singles Stake competition- Retake QC run at another meet

PASS

Dog ages 18 months or overGraduate to

Open Stake competitionor

Dog aged 7 years over (Irish Wolfhound over 5)

Veteran Stake competition

COMPETITVE COURSING SIGHTHOUNDS

RUN A QUALIFYING COURSE TEST

SINGLE RUNNING SIGHTHOUNDSDog ages 18 months or over

Graduate toSingles Stake competition

JUNIOR COURSER

PROVES A DOG CAN COURSE A LURE

MEET B:Dog aged 18 months or over


MEET A:Dog aged 18 months or over



Appendix 2: Sighthound Title Progression

(NSW) Requires insertion box for of Best In Field award/points for Open/Veterans Stakes competition. (Added below this table)

Other amendments made in accordance with submissions.

36

Open Stake competition dogs over 18 months old, minimum 2 JC runs, QC run passed

Once a dog achieves their FCH title, they move into the FCH Stake competition to accrue points for the further

titles of LCM and LCX

FCH title requirements50 75 points, which will be accrued in their breed, as:1point for the dog, PLUS

- 3points for 1st place (BOB)- 2points for 2nd place- 1point for 3rd place, PLUS

1point for each dog beaten, to a maximum of 10 points accrued per Meet (this means that it will take a minimum of 5 qualifying Meets to gain a FCH title).

Once a dog achieves their LCX title, they are then eligible to apply for a higher title (LCX2, LCX3 etc) for

every additional 20 breed points accrued.

LCX title requirements 25 points, which will be accrued under the same system as the FCH title, with an additional requirement:- must have achieved at least ONE 1st, or two 2nd places (this means that it will take a minimum of 3

LCM title requirements40 points, which will be accrued under the same system as the FCH title, with an additional requirement:- must have achieved at least ONE 1st, or two 2nd places (this means that it will take a minimum of 4

Field Champion Stake competition dogs who have fulfilled the requirements for a FCH title

Once a dog achieves their sLCX title, they are then eligible to apply for a higher title (sLCX2, sLCX3 etc) for

every additional 20 points accrued.

sLCX title requirements 32points, which will be accrued under the same system as the sFCH title, (this means that it will take a minimum of 8 qualifying Meets to gain a sLCX title).

sLCM title requirements32points, which will be accrued under the same system as the sFCH title, (this means that it will take a minimum of 8 qualifying Meets to gain a sLCM title).

Once a dog achieves their sFCH title, they can start to accrue points for further titles of sLCM and sLCX

sFCH title requirements40 points, made up of:- 3points per Meet, plus 1point for the dog (4points in total), (this means that it will take 10 qualifying Meets to gain a sFCH title).

Singles Stake competition dogs over 18 months old, minimum 2 JC runs

vLCM title requirements 30 points, which will be accrued under the same system as the FCH title (this means that it will take a minimum of 3 qualifying Meets to gain a vLCM title).

vFCH title requirements 50 points, which will be accrued under the same system as the FCH title (this means that it will take a minimum of 5 qualifying Meets to gain a vFCH title).

Veteran Stake competition dogs over 7 years (Irish Wolfhounds over 5)


(NSW) Best in Field table (to be inserted under boxes above)

Best in Field Points

1 point for each dog beaten to a maximum of 10 points for the meet. Eligible streams for the Best in Field award are Open, FCh, Veteran and vFCh as the streams where dogs compete against other dogs for awards. Only one Best in Field may be awarded per Meet across all four streams. Where there is a tie in scores for Best in Field, it will be awarded on a count back.

37


(NSW) Amendments made in accordance with submissions.

Appendix 3: CAT Title Progression

38

CAT competition dogs over 12 18months old, minimum 2 JC runs

Please note: Passes toward a title can only be accrued if the dog runs in both runs at a single Meet and scores a minimum total score of 160 100.

CA title requirementsA dog must obtain 10 5 Passes under a minimum of 3 judges, where a Pass means two runs per Meet, with the dog achieving a minimum score of 160 100.(this means that it will take a minimum of 10 qualifying Meets to gain a CA title).

Once a dog achieves their CA (Coursing Ability) title, they can then start to accrue Passes for

further titles of CAA (Coursing Ability Advanced) and CAX (Coursing Ability Excellent)

CAA title requirementsA dog must obtain 8 6 Passes under a minimum of 4 judges, where a Pass means two runs per Meet, with the dog achieving a minimum score of 160 100.(this means that it will take a minimum of 8 qualifying Meets to gain a CAA title).

CAX title requirements A dog must obtain 8 7 Passes under a minimum of 5 judges, where a Pass means two runs per Meet, with the dog achieving a minimum score of 160 100.(this means that it will take a minimum of 8 qualifying Meets to gain a CAX title).



Please note: Passes toward a title can only be accrued if the dog runs in both runs at a single Meet and scores a minimum total score of 160.

(NSW) Proposed changes, CAT Title Progression Table


Please note: Passes toward a title can only be accrued if the dog runs in both runs at a single Meet and scores a minimum total score of 160 100.

(NSW) Rationale, align with proposed new rule 5. Eligibility of dogs

39

CAT competition dogs over 12months old, minimum 2 JC runs

CAT competition dogs over 12months old 18 months old, minimum 2 JC

runs


REGULATIONS

PART 3L

REGULATIONS FOR THE CONDUCT OF LURE COURSINGJUDGES TRAINING & ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

7. Prior to 2020 must have coursed and titled a dog to Junior Courser (JC), and in the opinion of the ANKC Ltd Member Body, possess the necessary experience to enter the judges training scheme. From 1 January 2020 must have coursed and titled a dog to Field Champion (FCH)/ equivalent. (Amended EM#138, 07/16)


7. Prior to 2020 2022 must have coursed and titled a dog to Junior Courser (JC), and in the opinion of the ANKC Ltd Member Body, possess the necessary experience to enter the judges training scheme. From 1 January 2020 2022 must have personally coursed and titled a dog to Field Champion (FCH), / equivalent Veteran Field Champion, Singles Field Champion or Coursing Ability title. (Amended EM#138, 07/16)

(NSW) Rationale: The current entry level requirements do not contemplate a CAT dog owner becoming a judge beyond 2020. The proposed amendment corrects this, and allows 2 additional years for start-up states to bring together an initial cohort of judge aspirants.

40

Date post:	18-Jan-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

ANKC Lure Coursing Working Partyankc.org.au/media/9261/4-attachment-5c.docx · Web viewAligns...

Documents