ANNETTE ENEMARKDirector of Tetraplan (DK)

You are……familiar with the S.U.M.P planning process Stand up …an experienced S.U.M.P’er Keep standing Otherwise: Sit right back

Special European Barometer: Attitudes of European towards Urban Mobility, 2013

Will mobility conditions change? 24% belive it will improve37% belive it will be worse35% belive it will be the same

One-third of the memberstates feel their access in cities are beeing limited

In more than half the memberstates congestion is an important urban problem

38% of citizens encounter problems when traveling within cities

Special European Barometer: Attitudes of European towards Urban Mobility, 2013

Who should fix the problems..

56% City authorities52% Citizens themselves 28% Regional authorities27% National Government 3% Private companies

The story of S.U.M.P.Action Plan on Urban Mobility (2009)

White Paper (2011)

Urban Mobility Package (2013)

Funding optionsHorizon 2020INTEREGCivitas Activity Fund ...

SUMP vs. traditional planning

  The Transport planner

The SUMP Way The Urban planner

Approach Access to roads, busses, bike lanes…

The need of the traveller

All things at the right place

Aim Optimize capacity Optimize mobility Optimize land use

Focus Reduction of risks, as accidents, noise, pollution

Accessibility Reduction of negative impacts from other functions

Solution Hardware solutions Software and hardware solution

Strict land use laws

Understanding of mobility

Movement from A to B in time and space

More than from A to B

A side-effect to be managed

Adapted with pride from: Mobility researchers from Aalborg University, The SUMP manual , Can Less sometimes be more? Integrating land use and transport, 2013,

Scen

ario

Ba

sed

on th

e Ur

ban

Plan

ner M

odel

, VEM

A. F

orm

elm

.dk

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Changes in modal split if...

Scenario of 100 families Changes in modal split if...

Multi fa

mily

All bike

All Public

tran

spor

t

½ parkin

g

Full

Monty

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

CarBike /walkPublic Transport

Modalsplit 100 singleFamily Houses

The many devils …

The siloes

The outreach to internal and external partners

The active engagement with the public

Setting targets and evaluating effects

Finding the funding

Securing political backing

Time consuming

Interactions in the mobility management sector: new coopera-tions, techniques, solutions, ECOMM 1999.Regional aspects of MM, ECOMM 2000.Responsible mobility - active partnerships, ECOMM 2002.Managing transport demand to attain sustainable development and economic effectiveness, ECOMM 2003.Transition toward a sustainable urban mobility: demonstrate to convince, ECOMM 2004. Delivering attractive options for sustainable travel in different stages of life – current demands shaping the future of travel, ECOMM 2005.Accessibility and attractiveness of cities, ECOMM 2006.The future and MM, ECOMM 2007.TDM - Tackling Climate Change, ECOMM 2008. Cost/benefit and evaluation of MM, ECOMM 2009. Moving people - bridging spaces, ECOMM 2010. Economic Recession: A new dawn for MM, ECOMM 2011. MM - Key Factor for European development, ECOMM 2012. Smart choices require easy access – the challenge of making MM a part of every day life, ECOMM 2013. Creating the bridge to a green, fair and prosperous mobility future, ECOMM 2014.

GOODPRACTICES.U.M.P.

Cope

nhag

en –

visi

on a

nd g

oal s

etti

ng

Borrowed - with thanks - from Dr. Susanne Böhler-Baedeker, Rupprecht Consult

West of England partnership

– institutional cooperation

Birmingham

– integrating energy and m

obility planning

Gent – consequent sustainable urban mobility planning

Vien

na

– qua

lity-

cont

rolle

d

urba

n m

obili

ty s

trat

egy

Dresden– stakeholder and citizen involvement

Is S.U.M.P.the new black?