Date post: | 16-Mar-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | truongkhue |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 3 times |
103R. Pandey et al., The National Clean Energy Fund of India, SpringerBriefs in Energy, DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1964-4, © The Author(s) 2014
Annexure 1Experts and Stakeholders Consulted During the Course of the Study
S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2
Name Affiliation Name Affiliation
1. M. Govinda Rao NIPFP, New Delhi Kirit Parikh, (Panelist and Chair)
IRADe, New Delhi
2. Rakesh Bhalla (Panelist)
IREDA, New Delhi Meena Agarwal (Panelist)
Ministry of Finance, New Delhi
3. Pradeep Dadhich (Panelist)
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India, New Delhi
Anil Kumar Jain (Panelist)
Planning Commission, New Delhi
4. Usha Rao (Panelist)
KFW, New Delhi D.N. Prasad (Panelist)
Ministry of Coal, New Delhi
5. Shailly Kedia TERI, New Delhi Tapas Sen NIPFP, New Delhi6. Sriya Mohanti Shakti Foundation,
New DelhiKrishan Dhawan Shakti Foundation,
New Delhi7. Sohail Akhtar Ministry of New
Renewable Energy, New Delhi
Shashank Jain Shakti Foundation, New Delhi
8. K. Yepthu IREDA, New Delhi Chinmaya Kumar Acharya
Shakti Foundation, New Delhi
9. Aparna Vashisth TERI, New Delhi SriyaMohanti Shakti Foundation, New Delhi
10. Manish Anand TERI, New Delhi AnkitaBhatnagar Intern, Shakti Foundation, New Delhi
11. Anandayit Goswami
TERI Africa ManjushaShukla IREDA, New Delhi
12. Anurag Mishra USAID, New Delhi Rakesh Bhalla IREDA, New Delhi13. Ashirbad Raha Climate Group, India S. Padmanaban USAID, New Delhi14. Pramode Kant Institute of Green
Economy, New Delhi
Anurag Mishra USAID, New Delhi
104 Annexure 1: Experts and Stakeholders Consulted
S. no. Workshop 1 Workshop 2
Name Affiliation Name Affiliation
15. Lydia Powell Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi
Monali Zeya Hazra USAID, New Delhi
16. Karthik Ganeshan Council on Energy Environment and Water, New Delhi
Mudit Narain World Bank, New Delhi
17. Vyoma Jha Council on Energy Environment and Water, New Delhi
Veena Joshi Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, New Delhi
18. Rishabh Jain Council on Energy Environment and Water, New Delhi
PreetiSoni UNDP, New Delhi
19. Abhinav Goyal Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi
Pramode Kant Institute of Green Economy, New Delhi
20. Shradha Kapur C-Kinetics, New Delhi Sanjay Dube Nexant, New Delhi21. Anil Kumar IIEC, New Delhi22. Dilip Limaye SRC Global, Greater
Philadelphia Area, USA
23. Mahesh Patankar MP Ensystems Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai
24. Ahmad Khalid Adelphi, New Delhi25. Manpreet Singh KPMG, Gurgaon26. Stuti Sharma KPMG, Gurgaon27. Sameer Maithel Greentech
Knowledge Solutions Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
28. Abhinav Goyal CSE, New Delhi29. Probir Ghosh Sustainable Resource
& Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Colorado, USA
30. Subir Das Sustainable Resource & Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Kolkata
31. Sumana Bhattacharya
Interco-operation India, New Delhi
32. Bhasker Padigala WWF, New Delhi
105R. Pandey et al., The National Clean Energy Fund of India, SpringerBriefs in Energy, DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1964-4, © The Author(s) 2014
Annexure 2
Norms for computing likely annual savings of conventional fuel/electricity through renewable energy deployment
Renewable energy source/system Likely annual savings of conventional fuel/electricity
Wind power 2.00 million unit/MWSmall hydro power 3.00 million unit/MWSolar photovoltaic (PV) power 1.66 million unit/MWSolar PV lantern 50 L K-oil/lanternSolar PV home lighting system 100 L K-oil/systemSolar thermal energy 1.00 MU/MW
• Power generation 36 TOE/1,000 m2 collector area•Thermal energy systems 0.50–0.70 MU/1,000 m2 collector area
Bio energy 4.00 million unit/MW1. Bagasse cogeneration 6.00 million unit/MW2. Biomass power 1,000 TOE/MWeq
3. Biomass energy (thermal) 4.00 million unit/MW4. Urban and industrial waste to energy 1,000 TOE/MWeq
a. Power generation 450 kg LPG/1,000 m3 biogas b. Thermal energy/cogeneration 0.36 million units/1,000 m3 biogas
5. Family type biogas plants6. Medium size biogas plants
MW Megawatt (installed capacity of power plant)MWeq Megawatt equivalent-do-MU Million units (electricity generated saved)TOE Tonnes of oil equivalent (oil saved)LPG Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG saved)Remark 1 Unit of electricity = 0.7 kg of oil
Norms for Computing Likely Energy Saving from RE Usage
107R. Pandey et al., The National Clean Energy Fund of India, SpringerBriefs in Energy, DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1964-4, © The Author(s) 2014
Following is a real world example of projects under implementation and recently completed where extensive monitoring and evaluation handles have been provided at the design stage and also being utilised. For purposes of confidentiality the names and agencies have been kept out.Renewable energy based power generation project: REPP project planning matrix
Annexure 3Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation
108 Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation
Stra
tegy
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
Targ
ets
Sour
ce o
f ve
rific
atio
nR
isks
and
ass
umpt
ions
Goa
lC
umul
ativ
e gr
eenh
ouse
gas
em
issi
on
redu
ctio
n fr
om p
ower
gen
erat
ion
in
proj
ect i
n co
untr
y x
by th
e en
d of
pr
ojec
t (E
OP)
, kto
ns C
O2
316.
493
5.8a
DO
E r
ecor
ds, I
PP p
ower
gen
era-
tion
data
, nat
iona
l sta
tistic
s,
natio
nal c
omm
unic
atio
ns,
FRE
PP p
rogr
ess
repo
rts
and
M&
E r
epor
ts
Tra
nspa
renc
y of
dec
isio
n m
akin
g, c
oope
ratio
n of
sta
keho
lder
s in
the
prov
isio
n of
dat
a, s
tabl
e po
litic
al e
nvir
onm
ent
Red
uctio
n of
gre
en-
hous
e ga
s em
issi
ons
from
pro
ject
in
coun
try
x’s
pow
er
sect
orP
roje
ct o
bjec
tive
bC
umul
ativ
e in
stal
led
new
pri
vate
sec
tor-
owne
d R
E-b
ased
pow
er g
ener
atio
n ca
paci
ty b
y E
OP,
MW
0c4.
7dSu
rvey
of
IPP
inve
stm
ent
activ
ities
, int
ervi
ews
with
pr
ospe
ctiv
e in
vest
ors,
FT
IB
appr
oval
s, fi
nanc
ing
docu
-m
ents
fro
m b
anks
/fina
ncia
l in
stitu
tions
, RE
PP p
rogr
ess
repo
rts
and
M&
E r
epor
ts,
FEA
ann
ual r
epor
ts, D
OE
ye
arly
ene
rgy
stat
istic
s
Inve
stor
s pe
rcei
ve c
urre
nt
gove
rnan
ce s
yste
ms
as
cond
uciv
e fo
r do
ing
busi
ness
in th
e co
untr
y.
Cou
ntry
’s s
over
eign
ris
k ca
n be
man
aged
thro
ugh
gove
rnm
ent g
uara
ntee
s
Rem
oval
of
maj
or
barr
iers
to th
e w
ides
prea
d an
d co
st-e
ffec
tive
use
of
grid
-bas
ed r
enew
-ab
le e
nerg
y su
pply
vi
a co
mm
erci
ally
vi
able
ren
ewab
le
ener
gy te
chno
logi
es
Shar
e of
RE
in p
roje
ct in
cou
ntry
x’s
po
wer
gen
erat
ion
mix
by
EO
P, %
5289
.0
Cum
ulat
ive
elec
tric
ity p
rodu
ctio
n fr
om
RE
-bas
ed p
ower
gen
erat
ion
plan
ts b
y E
OP,
GW
h
494.
01,
505.
1e
Out
com
e 1
Cum
ulat
ive
inve
stm
ent o
n R
E-b
ased
po
wer
gen
erat
ion
by E
OP,
US$
mill
ion
010
0Su
rvey
of
IPP
inve
stm
ent
activ
ities
, int
ervi
ews
with
pr
ospe
ctiv
e in
vest
ors,
FT
IB a
ppro
vals
, Fin
anci
ng
docu
men
ts f
rom
ban
ks/F
Is,
FRE
PP p
rogr
ess
repo
rts
and
M&
E r
epor
ts
Inve
stm
ent c
limat
e do
es n
ot
dete
rior
ate
furt
her,
polit
i-ca
l sta
bilit
y m
aint
aine
d,
gove
rnm
ent a
ble
to ta
ke
on a
dditi
onal
con
tinge
nt
liabi
litie
s
Faci
litat
ion
of in
vest
-m
ents
on
ener
gy
proj
ects
, par
-tic
ular
ly o
n R
E
and
biom
ass
base
d po
wer
gen
erat
ion
109Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation
Stra
tegy
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
Targ
ets
Sour
ce o
f ve
rific
atio
nR
isks
and
ass
umpt
ions
Out
put 1
.1: g
over
n-m
ent e
nerg
y A
ctN
o. o
f pr
opos
ed a
rtic
les
on th
e en
ergy
bill
th
at a
re e
ndor
sing
RE
-bas
ed p
ower
ge
nera
tion
in p
roje
ct in
cou
ntry
x
0D
ec 20
12C
abin
et r
ecor
ds (
Gaz
ette
)R
elev
ant k
ey s
take
hold
ers
such
as
Prim
e M
inst
ers
Offi
ce, M
inis
try
of
Just
ice
are
supp
ortiv
e an
d co
-ope
rativ
e. D
ecre
e ba
sed
legi
slat
ion
acce
pt-
able
to f
orei
gn in
vest
ors
A c
abin
et-a
ppro
ved
com
preh
ensi
ve
Ene
rgy
Act
pro
mul
gate
d0
Dec
2011
Inst
itutio
nal r
efor
m o
f D
OE
to e
ffec
tivel
y ad
min
iste
r th
e Pr
ojec
t in
coun
try
x E
nerg
y le
gisl
atio
n
0Ju
n 20
12O
rgan
isat
iona
l cha
rt o
f D
OE
Fund
ing
for
the
orga
n-is
atio
nal r
efor
ms
are
appr
oved
Out
put 1
.2: i
mpl
e-m
entin
g ru
les
and
regu
latio
ns (
IRR
s)
No.
of
spec
ific
IRR
s en
forc
ed b
y E
OP
0D
ec 20
13G
over
nmen
t gaz
ette
, pub
licat
ion
of r
egul
atio
nPo
litic
al w
ill e
xist
s to
ap
prov
e an
d en
forc
e IR
Rs.
Inv
esto
rs a
nd le
nd-
ers
inte
rest
s is
pro
tect
edN
o. o
f re
vise
d IR
Rs
prop
osed
to e
nhan
ce
ener
gy a
ct im
plem
enta
tion
by E
OP
0D
ec 20
13O
utpu
t 1.3
: G
over
nmen
t age
n-ci
es w
ith e
nhan
ced
regu
lato
ry a
nd in
sti-
tutio
nal c
apac
ity o
n en
ergy
dev
elop
-m
ent,
in g
ener
al,
and
RE
dev
elop
-m
ent i
n pa
rtic
ular
No.
of
RE
reg
ulat
ions
and
lega
l fra
me-
wor
ks a
dmin
iste
red
by D
OE
sen
ior
staf
f fo
r IP
P pr
ojec
ts a
nd r
ural
ele
ctri
fi-ca
tion
by E
OP
01
Staf
f pe
rfor
man
ce a
nnua
l rep
ort,
DO
E fi
les,
lice
nse
issu
edR
eten
tion
of s
kille
d pe
rson
-ne
l, jo
b ev
alua
tion
reco
mm
enda
tion
Perc
enta
ge o
f ap
prov
ed R
E-b
ased
pow
er
gene
ratio
n pr
ojec
ts th
at a
re f
ully
-co
mpl
iant
with
DO
E-a
dmin
iste
red
RE
re
gula
tory
and
lega
l fra
mew
orks
by
EO
P
010
0
110 Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation
Stra
tegy
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
Targ
ets
Sour
ce o
f ve
rific
atio
nR
isks
and
ass
umpt
ions
Out
com
e 2
No.
of
iden
tified
tech
nica
lly v
iabl
e R
E
proj
ects
EO
P0
6D
OE
file
s, D
OE
ann
ual r
epor
tsFE
A is
not
pri
vatiz
ed (
sold
) co
mpl
etel
y an
d co
-op
erat
es in
an
effo
rt to
m
obili
ze p
riva
te s
ecto
r ca
pita
l.
Tech
nica
l fea
sibi
lity
of h
arne
ssin
g R
E
reso
urce
s ar
e as
cer-
tain
ed a
nd m
ade
wid
ely
know
n
No.
of
inve
stor
s th
at m
ade
use
of a
vail-
able
tech
nica
l inf
orm
atio
n on
fea
sibl
e R
E-b
ased
ene
rgy
syst
em p
roje
cts
by
EO
P
020
Out
put 2
.1: o
pera
tiona
l ce
ntra
lized
ene
rgy
data
base
sys
tem
No.
of
clie
nts
that
req
uest
ser
vice
s fr
om
the
cent
ral c
lear
ingh
ouse
for
thei
r R
E-b
ased
ene
rgy
syst
ems
proj
ect E
OP
030
0D
OE
file
s, D
OE
ann
ual r
epor
ts,
info
rmat
ion
requ
est a
nd
feed
back
for
ms
Gov
ernm
ent u
ses
its r
egul
a-to
ry p
ower
s to
ove
rrid
e co
mm
erci
al c
onfid
entia
l-ity
con
cern
s an
d or
ders
da
ta a
nd in
form
atio
n to
be
mad
e pu
blic
No.
of
clie
nts
that
mak
e us
e of
the
cent
ral
ener
gy d
atab
ase
syst
em e
ach
year
015
0
Perc
enta
ge o
f cl
eari
ngho
use
and
cent
ral
ener
gy d
atab
ase
syst
em c
lient
s ea
ch
year
that
are
sat
isfie
d w
ith th
e se
rvic
es
rece
ived
080
No.
of
impl
emen
ted
RE
-bas
ed p
ower
gen
-er
atio
n pr
ojec
ts th
at w
ere
faci
litat
ed
by th
e ce
ntra
l cle
arin
g ho
use
syst
em
by E
OP
020
Out
put 2
.2: c
ompl
eted
an
d pu
blis
hed
RE
res
ourc
e as
sess
men
ts
No.
of
com
preh
ensi
ve R
E r
esou
rce
asse
ss-
men
ts c
ompl
eted
by
EO
P0
12D
OE
file
s, D
OE
ann
ual r
epor
ts,
reso
urce
ass
essm
ent r
epor
ts,
Met
and
PW
D a
nnua
l re
port
s, f
ores
try
annu
al
repo
rts,
FE
A a
nnua
l rep
orts
, IP
P pr
opos
als
Res
ourc
e da
ta a
nd a
sses
s-m
ents
are
acc
urat
e an
d re
liabl
eA
vera
ge p
erce
ntag
e in
crea
se in
cur
-re
ntly
kno
wn
RE
pot
entia
ls th
at w
as
esta
blis
hed
afte
r th
e R
E r
esou
rce
asse
ssm
ents
0D
ec 20
13
No.
of
inve
stor
s th
at m
ade
use
of th
e R
E
reso
urce
ass
essm
ent d
ata/
info
rmat
ion
in th
e de
sign
of
thei
r R
E-b
ased
pow
er
gene
ratio
n pr
ojec
ts b
y E
OP
06
111Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation
Stra
tegy
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
Targ
ets
Sour
ce o
f ve
rific
atio
nR
isks
and
ass
umpt
ions
Out
put 2
.3: a
sses
sed
feas
ibili
ty o
f R
E
inve
stm
ents
No.
of
com
plet
ed a
nd p
ublis
hed
new
fe
asib
ility
stu
dies
of
IPP
inve
stm
ents
by
EO
P
06
DO
E w
ebsi
te, I
PP p
ropo
s-al
s, D
OE
Cor
pora
te p
lan,
FE
A A
nnua
l rep
orts
, FT
IB
reco
rds
Co-
finan
cing
com
pone
nts
secu
red
No.
of
plan
ned
new
fea
sibi
lity
anal
yses
to
be c
arri
ed o
ut (
afte
r FR
EPP
) by
EO
P0
4
Perc
enta
ge o
f in
tere
sted
inve
stor
s in
pr
ojec
t in
coun
try
x th
at e
xpre
ssed
con
-fid
ence
in th
e te
chni
cal a
nd fi
nanc
ial
viab
ilitie
s of
RE
-bas
ed p
ower
gen
era-
tion
proj
ects
by
EO
P
030
Out
com
e 3
No.
of
addi
tiona
l rur
al h
ouse
hold
s th
at
have
acc
ess
to g
reen
ele
ctri
city
by
EO
P0
10,0
00Si
gned
PPA
, con
trac
ts, fi
nanc
ing
agre
emen
ts, s
hare
hold
er
agre
emen
ts; H
IES
repo
rt,
DO
E a
nnua
l rep
orts
and
re
cord
s
Polit
ical
will
exi
sts
to a
llow
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
inve
stm
ent
in I
PP. F
EA
rem
ains
a
stat
e ow
ned
utili
ty,
Priv
ate
sect
or in
vest
ors
perc
eive
Pro
ject
in c
oun-
try
x as
via
ble
dest
ina-
tion.
Gov
ernm
ent r
ulin
g in
oth
er s
ecto
rs d
oes
not
unde
rmin
e in
vest
ors’
co
nfide
nce
Mar
kets
for
spe
cific
re
new
able
ene
rgy
tech
nolo
gies
are
su
ppor
ted
No.
of
finan
cial
clo
sure
s ac
hiev
ed f
or n
ew
RE
-bas
ed p
ower
gen
erat
ion
proj
ects
by
EO
P
020
No.
of
RE
T s
yste
m e
quip
men
t/com
pone
nt
supp
liers
& d
istr
ibut
ors
in P
roje
ct in
co
untr
y x
by E
OP
57
Ove
rall
volu
me
of b
usin
ess
in th
e R
E
mar
ket i
n Pr
ojec
t in
coun
try
x by
EO
P,
US$
mill
ion
010
0
Out
put 3
.1: d
esig
ned
and
impl
emen
ted
RE
-bas
ed p
ower
ge
nera
tion
dem
onst
ratio
n
Ove
rall
inst
alle
d ca
paci
ty o
f R
E-b
ased
po
wer
gen
erat
ion
dem
o pr
ojec
ts b
y E
OP,
MW
04.
7D
OE
rec
ords
, DO
E A
nnua
l R
epor
t, FE
A A
nnua
l R
epor
ts, F
EA
Cor
pora
te
plan
, DO
E C
orpo
rate
pla
n
Polit
ical
will
incl
udin
g G
over
nmen
t fun
ding
av
aila
ble
to im
plem
ent
dem
o pr
ojec
ts, r
esou
rce
owne
rshi
p no
t an
issu
e,
dem
o pr
ojec
ts a
re s
uc-
cess
ful i
nclu
ding
no
maj
or n
atur
al d
isas
ter
No.
of
dem
o pr
ojec
ts th
at a
re b
oth
oper
a-tio
nally
and
fina
ncia
lly v
iabl
e by
EO
P0
10
No.
of
plan
ned
RE
-bas
ed p
ower
gen
era-
tion
proj
ects
that
are
rep
licat
ing
any
of
the
dem
o pr
ojec
ts b
y E
OP
116
Tota
l ins
talle
d ca
paci
ty o
f re
plic
atio
n R
E-b
ased
pow
er g
ener
atio
n pr
ojec
ts
by E
OP
0A
t lea
st
3
112 Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation
Stra
tegy
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
Targ
ets
Sour
ce o
f ve
rific
atio
nR
isks
and
ass
umpt
ions
Out
put 3
.2: p
repa
red
stan
dard
pow
er
purc
hase
agr
eem
ent
(PPA
) fo
r IP
Ps
End
orse
d St
anda
rd P
ower
Pur
chas
e A
gree
men
t (SP
PA)
tem
plat
es th
at
are
used
for
IPP
pro
ject
s in
pro
ject
in
coun
try
x
01f
Tend
er d
ocum
ents
for
com
peti-
tive
IPP
proc
urem
ent,
DO
E
web
site
Inte
rest
s of
all
part
ies
are
adeq
uate
ly p
rote
cted
No.
of
IPP
RE
-bas
ed p
ower
pro
ject
s th
at
mad
e us
e of
any
of
the
appr
oved
SPP
A
tem
plat
es b
y E
OP
06
Out
put 3
.3: c
ompl
eted
in
vest
men
t pro
mo-
tion
pack
age
No.
of
pros
pect
ive
inve
stor
s m
akin
g en
quir
ies
with
gov
ernm
ent a
genc
ies
015
DO
E A
nnua
l Rep
ort,
Rec
ord
of I
nves
tor
prop
osal
s,
Inve
stm
ent F
orum
Rep
ort,
Lis
t of
Part
icip
ants
Rol
e of
DO
E a
s an
inve
st-
men
t fac
ilita
tor
acce
pted
by
Cab
inet
Cum
ulat
ive
num
ber
of in
vest
ors
that
ex
pres
sed
and
plan
ned
to in
vest
and
im
plem
ent R
E-b
ased
pow
er g
ener
atio
n pr
ojec
ts b
y E
OP
010
Out
put 3
.4: C
ompl
eted
as
sess
men
t and
de
velo
ped
RE
in
cent
ives
sch
emes
A c
ompr
ehen
sive
rep
ort o
n op
tions
and
is
sues
rel
ated
to th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f a
subs
idy
fund
for
pri
vate
sec
tor
rene
w-
able
ene
rgy
inve
stm
ent p
ublis
hed
0gJu
n 20
12C
ompl
eted
fea
sibi
lity
repo
rtN
B: R
ef R
E f
und
desi
gn
thro
ugh
RE
SCO
Out
com
e 4
Cab
inet
app
rove
d-el
ectr
ifica
tion
mas
ter
plan
0D
ec 20
13M
aste
r pl
an d
ocum
ent,
DO
E
web
page
, DO
E fi
les,
FE
A
annu
al r
epor
t, D
OE
ene
rgy
stat
istic
s ye
ar b
ook
The
goa
l of
100
% e
lect
ri-
ficat
ion
is m
aint
aine
d;
rene
wab
le b
ased
pow
er
gene
ratio
n co
ntin
ue to
be
cost
com
petit
ive;
ren
ew-
able
ene
rgy
pote
ntia
l is
suffi
cien
t to
mee
t cur
rent
an
d fu
ture
dem
and
Ren
ewab
le e
nerg
y de
velo
pmen
ts in
te-
grat
ed in
to n
atio
nal
ener
gy p
lan
tow
ards
10
0 %
ele
ctri
fica-
tion
of p
roje
ct in
co
untr
y x
Ave
rage
ann
ual b
udge
t for
the
elec
trifi
ca-
tion
mas
ter
plan
by
EO
P, U
S$ m
illio
n0
10
Perc
enta
ge u
tiliz
atio
n of
cou
ntry
’s R
E
reso
urce
s (f
or p
ower
pur
pose
s) b
y E
OP
5290
113Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation
Stra
tegy
Indi
cato
rB
asel
ine
Targ
ets
Sour
ce o
f ve
rific
atio
nR
isks
and
ass
umpt
ions
Out
put 4
.1: c
ompl
eted
tr
aini
ng p
rogr
amm
e on
inte
grat
ed
ener
gy p
lann
ing
(IE
P) a
nd a
dmin
-is
trat
ive
ener
gy
polic
y fo
r go
vern
-m
ent p
erso
nnel
No.
of
GO
F pe
rson
nel t
rain
ed o
n IE
P an
d en
ergy
pol
icy
each
yea
r st
artin
g ye
ar
2011
26
DO
E r
ecor
ds, t
rain
ing
asse
ss-
men
t and
trai
ning
pla
n do
cum
ent,
reco
rds
of
trai
ning
ses
sion
s, F
NU
and
U
SP a
nnua
l fac
ulty
rep
orts
, ce
rtifi
cate
s
Tra
inin
g in
stitu
tions
are
w
illin
g to
co-
oper
ate
with
go
vern
men
t, qu
alifi
ed
staf
f ca
n be
ret
aine
d w
ithin
the
ener
gy s
ecto
rPe
rcen
tage
trai
ned
GO
F pe
rson
nel t
hat a
re
activ
ely
enga
ged
in R
E-b
ased
pow
er
gene
ratio
n po
licy
mak
ing,
pla
nnin
g an
d im
plem
enta
tion,
ope
ratio
ns a
nd
eval
uatio
n by
EO
P
050
No.
of
trai
ning
inst
itutio
ns th
at a
re c
apab
le
and
qual
ified
in I
EP
and
ener
gy p
olic
y tr
aini
ng/c
apac
ity b
uild
ing
by E
OP
22
Out
put 4
.2: c
om-
plet
ed a
nd
appr
oved
Nat
iona
l E
lect
rific
atio
n M
aste
r Pl
an
Cab
inet
app
rove
d-E
lect
rific
atio
n M
aste
r pl
an0
Dec
2013
Mas
ter
plan
doc
umen
t, D
OE
w
ebpa
ge, D
OE
file
s, F
EA
an
nual
rep
ort,
DO
E e
nerg
y st
atis
tics
year
boo
k
The
goa
l of
100
% e
lect
rifi-
catio
n is
mai
ntai
ned
Ave
rage
ann
ual b
udge
t for
the
elec
trifi
ca-
tion
mas
ter
plan
by
EO
P, U
S$ m
illio
n0
10
a Min
imum
end
-of-
proj
ect C
O2 e
mis
sion
red
uctio
n fr
om d
emon
stra
tions
onl
y (3
.2 M
W V
RE
PP,
and
25
% o
f bi
ofue
l mill
s op
erat
iona
l by
EO
P)b O
bjec
tive
mon
itore
d qu
arte
rly
ER
BM
and
ann
ually
in p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
revi
ewc C
onsi
deri
ng th
at F
SC a
nd T
ropi
k W
oods
are
not
ent
irel
y IP
Psd T
his
is m
inim
um, t
akin
g co
nsid
erat
ion
only
of
the
3.2
MW
VR
E b
iom
ass-
base
d po
wer
pla
nt a
nd 5
× 3
00 k
W d
iese
l eng
ines
usi
ng b
iodi
esel
pro
duce
d by
5
biof
uel m
ills
e Thi
s is
min
imum
, tak
ing
cons
ider
atio
n of
bas
elin
e R
E e
lect
rici
ty +
ele
ctri
city
gen
erat
ion
only
fro
m V
RE
bio
mas
s-ba
sed
PP a
nd 5
bio
dies
el p
ower
gen
era-
tion
units
f The
re w
ill b
e on
ly 1
sta
ndar
d te
mpl
ate
sinc
e th
ere
is o
nly
1 tr
ansm
issi
on a
nd d
istr
ibut
ion
utili
tyg Pr
ospe
ctiv
e pr
ivat
e R
E in
vest
ors
do n
ot c
omm
it fu
nds,
as
inve
stm
ents
are
com
mer
cial
ly n
ot v
iabl
e w
ithou
t sup
port
. Cou
ntry
X’s
ren
ewab
le e
nerg
y in
dust
ry
rem
ains
sm
all a
nd w
eak.
RE
inve
stm
ent r
emai
ns d
epen
dent
on
dono
r fu
ndin
g
114 Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation
Field visit-monitoring and evaluation small grantees’ projects
Field Visit- Monitoring & Evaluation Small Grantees’ Projects
S. No. Information
1. Title of the project
2. Name of the lead grantee & address
3. Name & address of the partner organization(s)
4. Type of the Project
Desk Research
Training & capacity building
Information dissemination / outreach
Field/ Technology Demonstration
5. Project location
6. Start date of the project
7. End date of the project
8. A brief description of the project
9. Project milestones & time frame
S. No.
Milestone Date as per the contract
Actual Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
10. Project deliverables & time frame
S. No.
Deliverables Completion date as per
contract
Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
115Annexure 3: Templates for Monitoring and Evaluation
11. Key observations from the field visit
12. Major deviations, if any, from project scope, methodology, time frame
13. Challenges faced / problems encountered & strategy
14. Information dissemination / outreach activities for the project
15. Any assistance required from USAID/WI/WII
16. Document Set Type of report Number expected Number received
Monthly Reports
Quarterly Reports
Quarterly Financial Report
Closure/Final Reports