+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07...

Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07...

Date post: 18-Mar-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 11 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
48
Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019
Transcript
Page 1: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Page 2: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –
Page 3: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019National 04

Introduction 05Mode share 06Participation in cycling 06Frequency of cycling journeys 07Cycling to work 07Main mode of commuting to work – shorter journeys 07Cycling to school 08Travel Tracker 08Total amount of cycling 08National Cycle Network in 2017 08Usage per km of NCN in 2017 09Access to bikes 09Safety 09Attitudes 09Other key facts and figures 10–11

Local 12Introduction 13Local area specific highlights 14–15Statistics by local authority 16–47

Page 4: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

National

Page 5: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 05

IntroductionThe Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 builds on previous editions and delivers Action 18 of the Cycling Action Plan for Scotland (CAPS). Action 18 states that the CAPS Delivery Forum should agree a suite of national indicators to inform the national picture of cycling participation, to be reported annually. As the Cycling Action Plan for Scotland is 10 years old in 2020, this report also covers changes that have occurred throughout this period.

This executive summary highlights key figures that Cycling Scotland has identified in the report.

Since 2010, cycling main mode, cycling participation cycling to work at least regularly, cycling to work as a main mode for short journeys, cycling to school and total amount of cycling have all increased.

Mode share• 1.5% of journeys were made by

bike in 2017. This figure averaged 1.3% between 2015–2017 and 0.9% between 2008–2010.

Cycling to work• 4.9% of people cycled to work at

least regularly.

Cycling to school• 5.2% of primary school pupils and

1.3% of secondary school pupils cycled to school. In 2010, the respective figures were 3.7% and 1.2%.

Participation in cycling• 12% of people said that they had

participated in at least 30 minutes of cycling within the four weeks prior. This included 16% of men and 9% of women. In 2009–11, the figure was 9%.

Frequency of cycling• 5.9% of people cycled as a

means of transport in the previous 7 days (8.6% of men and 3.4% of women).

• 6.5% of people cycled just for pleasure or to keep fit in the previous 7 days.

• 10.5% of people in further/higher education cycled as a means of transport in the previous 7 days.

• 9.8% of people who live in small remote towns cycled at least once a week as a means of transport.

Total amount of cycling• 290 million vehicle kilometres

were cycled on all roads by pedal cycles.

• Cycling usage per km of the National Cycle Network in 2017: 12,549.

Access to bikes• 34.4% of households in Scotland

have access to one or more bikes for private use.

Safety• In 2017, 5 people were killed

and 171 were seriously injured while cycling.

• In 2018, 6 people were killed and 156 were seriously injured while cycling.

Attitudes• The top 5 reasons given for not

cycling to work were:• Journey too far (33.3%)• Too many cars on the road

(18.2%)• Weather too cold/wet/windy

(16.2%)• Traffic travels too fast (12.4%)• Do not have a bike (11.9%).

Page 6: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 201906

Mode share1 Participation in cycling 2

1 Source: Scottish Household Survey Travel Diary 2017 [Table TD2]. 2 Source: Scotland’s People Annual Report: Results from the 2017 Scottish Household Survey [Table 8.1].

of people had participated in at least 30 minutes of

cycling within the previous four weeks

In 2009–11, the figure was 9%

of journeys were made by bike in 2017

This figure averaged 1.3% between 2015–2017 and 0.9% between

2008–2010*

* There was a methodology change in the travel diary in 2012 so comparisons may not be like-for-like

of malesIn 2009–11, the figure was 13%

of femalesIn 2009–11, the figure was 7%

1.5% 12%16% 9%

Ages 16–24

13%

16% 18

%

15%

8%

1%

13% 15

% 17%

14%

7%

1%

12% 13

%

17%

12%

5%

1%

10% 12

%

16%

10%

5%

1%

5%

0%

10%

15%

20%

25–34 35–44 45–59 75+60–74

2009

–11

avg

2012

–14

avg

2015

–17

avg

2017

Percentages by age

Page 7: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07

Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work 4

Main mode of commuting to work – shorter commutes5

3 In the previous seven days. Source: Scottish Household Survey 2016 [Table 25a]. This question is asked biannually with the most recent results being from 2016. The question was first asked in 2014. 4 Source: Scottish Household Survey 2016 with additional information from Transport Scotland. Confidence intervals for 2016/17 data: 90% (+/-) 0.5 95% (+/-) 0.5. 5 Source: Transport Scotland analysis of Scottish Household Survey.

Cycling for transport Cycling for pleasure/fitness

10.5%

10.3%9.8%

6.5%5.9%

9%8.6%

4.2%3.4%

of people of people

of men

of women

of people in small remote towns

of men

of women

of people in small remote towns

of people in further/higher education

Percentage of adults who ‘usually’ or ‘regularly’ cycle to work

Mode share for cycling to work when commutes are under 5 miles and under 2 miles

2016+17

2015+16

2014+15

2013+14

2012+13

2011

2010

4.9% at least regularly

5%

5.8%

5.7%

5.1%

4.2%

4.1%

2.1% Regularly2.8% Usually

2.6% Regularly2.4% Usually

3.4% Regularly2.4% Usually

3.2% Regularly2.6% Usually

2.8% Regularly2.3% Usually

2.2% Regularly2.0% Usually

1.8% Regularly2.3% Usually

Und

er 2

mile

s

Und

er 5

mile

s

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

2.7%

2.7% 3.

3% 3.5%

3.4%

3.5%

2.2% 2.

8%

4% 3.7%

3.8%

3.8%5%

0%

Page 8: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 201908

Cycling to school6 Total amount of cycling8

National Cycle Network in 20179Travel Tracker 7

6 Source: Hands Up Scotland Survey 2017 [Table 2.3]. 2018 report available on sustrans.org.uk [Table 6-4]. 7 Source: Living Streets Scotland. 8 Source: Reported Road Casualties 2017 [Table 13]. 9 Source: Sustrans Scotland.

* The methodology used to calculate this figure was revised in 2016 so comparisons cannot be made beyond this point.

Percentage of children who answered “cycle” when asked the question “How do you normally travel to school?”

vehicle km were cycled on all roads by pedal cycles in 2017*

Travel Tracker is a project by Living Streets Scotland which allows pupils to log the mode they used to travel to school that dayThis section takes a slice of the Travel Tracker data to examine the cycling trends in an Urban, Urban/Rural and Rural local authority over a school year.

Length of NCN in Scotland:

4,211km of routes (approx)

Length of traffic free NCN in Scotland:

1,285km of routes (approx)

Percentage of the Scottish population now living within

0.5km of the NCN:

290 million

30.5%

Prim

ary

Seco

ndar

y3.

7%1.

2% 4%1.

3%4.

1%1.

1%5%

0.9%

5%0.

9%5.

1%1%

5.1%

0.9%

5.2%

1.3%

201220112010 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

5%

0%

Aug17

Sep17

Oct17

Nov17

Dec17

Jan18

Feb18

Mar18

Apr18

May18

Jun18

5%

0%

10% UrbanUrban/RuralRural

Averages since 2000

2013–15 avg 347mil2012–14 avg 336mil2010–12 avg 304mil2008–10 avg 270mil2006–08 avg 248mil2004–06 avg 241mil2002–04 avg 245mil2000–02 avg 238mil

Page 9: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 09

Access to bikes11

Safety12Usage per km of NCN in 201710

10 Source: Sustrans Scotland. 11 Source: Transport and Travel in Scotland 2017 – SHS LA Results [Table 8]. 12 Source: Reported Road Casualties 2017 [Table A]. 13 Source: Transport and Travel in Scotland 2017 [Table 26].

Number of people killed or seriously injured

Number of children killed or seriously injured

The average number of people seriously injured for 2005–2008 was 131, compared to 161 for 2014–2017

Attitudes13

Reasons for not cycling to work (2014)*

Cycling usage per km:

12,549

Pedestrian usage per traffic-free km:

40,092

* The question was moved to biennial in 2014 and was omitted from the 2016 survey in error. 2014 is the latest available data.

In 2017

of households in Scotland have access to one or more bikes

for private use

33.3%Too far to cycle2010–14 average 35.9%

18.2%Too many cars on the road2010–14 average 14.1%

16.2%Weather too cold/wet/windy2010–14 average 18.9%

12.4%Traffic travels too fast2010–14 average 11.5%

11.9%Do not have a bike2010–14 average 13.6%

Kille

d

Serio

usly

Inju

red

713

87

156

916

913

149

815

95

164

814

85

171

201220112010 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

100

150

200

50

0Ki

lled

Serio

usly

Inju

red

123

023

121

211

018

111

18

010

201220112010 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

10

20

15

25

5

0

34.4%

Page 10: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

10 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Other key facts and figuresReported casualties by speed limit (2013–2017 average)14

KSI rates per million vehicle kms15 Overall casualty rates per million vehicle kms

14 Source: Reported Road Casualties 2017. 15 Source: Reported Road Casualties 2017.

mph20

mph30

mph40

mph50

mph60

mph70

010

4151

Kille

dSe

rious

ly in

jure

dM

inor

All

seve

ritie

s

110

652

0 627

1 8 29 38 1 3 5 9 4 29 56 89

0 2 3 5

0.49

0.53

0.57

0.49

0.45

0.49

0.54

0.61

201220112010 2013 2014 2015 2016* 2017*

3

4

2

1

0

2.62

2.70 2.92

2.69

2.42

2.33 2.

74

2.51

201220112010 2013 2014 2015 2016* 2017*

3

4

2

1

0

* Cycle vehicle km calculations were revised in 2016 so comparisons cannot be made beyond this point. * Cycle vehicle km calculations were revised in 2016 so comparisons cannot be made beyond this point.

On average between 2012 and 2016, there were 51 reported casualties of all severities in areas with a 20mph speed limit compared with 627 in areas with a 30mph speed limit. This does not take into account relative exposure.

Total killed:

7

Total minor:

654

Total seriously injured:

158

Total all severities:

819

Page 11: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

11Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Awareness and uptake of sustainable transport policies16

Distance travelled – journeys under 5km17

Vehicles involved in reported injury accidents18

16 Source: Transport and Travel in Scotland 2017 [Tables 46 & 47]. 17 Source: Scottish Household Survey Travel Diary 2017 [Table 19]. 18 Reported Road Casualties 2017 with added analysis by Transport Scotland. 19 Scottish Transport Statistics 2017 [Table 5.3].

Just over a third of people who were asked were aware of cycle hire schemes. Of these people, 3% had used them

aware of cycle hire schemes

of males

of females

of males

of females

usage by those who were aware of cycle hire schemes

In 2017, cars and taxis were involved in 86.8% of accidents involving a pedal cycle making up 75.5% of traffic volume.On average since 2002, cars and taxis have been involved in 85.6% of accidents involving a pedal cycle.On average since 2002, Light Goods Vehicles made up 13.7% of traffic volume and were involved in 5.8% of accidents involving a pedal cycle. On average between 2002–2004 LGVs made up 12% of traffic volume and were involved in 4% of accidents involving a pedal cycle. On average between 2015–2017 LGVs made up 14.7% of traffic volume and were involved in 8.2% of accidents involving a pedal cycle.In 2016, the volume of car traffic was 3% higher than in 2006, light goods vehicle traffic 28% higher, but heavy goods vehicle traffic 8% lower.19

18.1

%

13.5

%

9.4% 13

.5%

2km–3km1km–2km< 1km 3km–5km

20%

25%

10%

15%

5%

0%

of all journeys in Scotland were under 5km in

distance

42.1% 3.1%

38.7% 3%

35.6% 2.9%

54.5%

Page 12: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

Local

Page 13: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

13Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

IntroductionThe Local section of the Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 examines all the local authorities across Scotland and highlights statistics based on headline trends, workplaces and schools.

The datasets, their sources and any other related information are located below.

Headline trends and context1. Proportion of journeys under 5kmSource: Scottish Household Survey 2017: Local Area Analysis. [Table 19] – Transport Scotland.

This dataset shows the proportion of journeys within the local authority that are less than 5km. 5km represents a key distance for focus on potential modal shift to active travel as the average cycling journey is 4.7km in length [TATIS 2016].

2. Households with access to one or more bikes for private useSource: Scottish Household Survey 2017: Local Area Analysis. [Table 8] – Transport Scotland.

This dataset indicates the percentage of households that have access to one or more bicycles for private use. These figures have a slightly larger sample size than cycle to work usually or regularly.

3. Households with no access to a car for private useSource: Scottish Household Survey 2016: Local Area Analysis. [Table 4] – Transport Scotland.

This dataset indicates the percentage of households that do not have access to a car for private use. These figures have a slightly larger sample size than cycle to work usually or regularly.

Work5. Cycle to work usually or regularlySource: Scottish Household Survey 2017 with further information from Transport Scotland.

This dataset indicates the total percentage of adults ‘usually’ or ‘regularly’ cycling to work in each local authority. Confidence intervals are included to show possible range of figures.

6. Number of Cycling Friendly Employers and employeesSource: Cycling Scotland 2019.

This dataset shows the number of Cycling Friendly Employers within a local authority and the number of staff that are covered. Cycling Friendly Employer is a nationally recognised award for Scottish employers committed to increasing levels of cycling.

Schools7. Children cycling to primary schoolSource: Hands Up Survey Scotland 2017. [Table 3.3] – Sustrans Scotland.

This dataset shows the percentage of children who answered “cycle” when asked the question “How do you normally travel to school?” as part of the Hands Up Scotland Survey.

8. Children cycling to secondary schoolSource: Hands Up Survey Scotland 2017. [Table 3.3] – Sustrans Scotland.

This data shows the percentage of children who answered “cycle” when asked the question “How do you normally travel to school?” as part of the Hands Up Scotland Survey.2018 report available on sustrans.org.uk [Table 6-4].

9. Number of Cycling Friendly Schools and pupilsSource: Cycling Scotland 2019.

This dataset shows the number of Cycling Friendly Schools within a local authority and the number of pupils that are covered. Cycling Friendly Schools is a nationally recognised award for Scottish schools committed to increasing levels of cycling.

10. Percentage of primary schools providing Level 2 Bikeability Scotland trainingSource: Data provided by local authorities.

Bikeability Scotland is a cycle training scheme designed to give children the skills and confidence they need to cycle safely on the roads and to encourage them to carry on cycling into adulthood. Argyll & Bute, East Ayrshire and North Ayrshire Councils each deliver their own cycle training product.

Active travel budgetSource: Information provided by local authorities.

This dataset indicates the active travel budget of local authorities in 2017/18. Where recent data is unavailable the figure is from 2016/17.

Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by LA may not capture full spend.

Page 14: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

14 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Local area specific highlightsTop 5 usually/regularly 20 Top 5 journeys under 5km21

1st Edinburgh City 1st Dundee City

Possible range 95% CI (+/-) 9%–14.8%

80%

This is compared to the national figure of 4.9%

The top 5 local authorities who usually or regularly cycle to work

This is compared to the national figure of 54.5%

The top 5 local authorities by percentage of journey under 5km

11.9%

2nd Highland 2nd Aberdeen City

Possible range 95% CI (+/-) 7.1%–16.3%11.7% 75.2%

3rd Moray 3rd Edinburgh City

Possible range 95% CI (+/-) 4.3%–13.9%9.1% 71.2%

4th Dundee City 4th Glasgow City

Possible range 95% CI (+/-) 3.4%–13.6%8.5% 71.1%

5th Orkney Islands 5th Falkirk

Possible range 95% CI (+/-) 2.5%–10.3%6.4% 70.1%

20 Source: Scottish Household Survey 2017 with additional information from Transport Scotland. 21 Source: Scottish Household Survey 2017 Local Authority Analysis [Table 19].

Page 15: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

15Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Top 5 access to bikes22

15

1st Highland

This is compared to the national figure of 34.4%

The top 5 local authorities that have access to at least one bike for private use

2nd Orkney Islands

47%

3rd Aberdeenshire

46.7%

4th Moray

46.4%

5th Perth & Kinross

45.5%

54.3%

22 Source: Scottish Household Survey 2017 Local Authority Analysis [Table 8].

Page 16: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

16 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

5.5%

2.5% – 8.5%

4.3%

3.7%

1.6%

1.2%

Capital£3,347,000.00

Revenue£221,000.00

27%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

31.4%75.2%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

24 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

9,990staff

17 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

5,164pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

41.7%

Aberdeen City

Page 17: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

17Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

2.2%

0.3% – 4.1%

5%

5%

2.3%

1.7%

Capital£850,000.58

Revenue£243,698.75

13.4%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

46.7%41.2%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2016/17

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

1 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

700staff

42 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

11,081pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

79.3%

Aberdeenshire

Page 18: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

18 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Angus

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

4.7%

1.3% – 8.1%

4.7%

3.5%

2%

2%

CapitalNo data

RevenueNo data

19.8%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

37.5%58.5%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

6 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

1,210staff

7 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

3,820pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

66.7%

Page 19: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

19Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Argyll & Bute

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

3.3%

0.2% – 6.4%

3.5%

3.8%

Response rate too low

1.1%

Capital£546,135.16

Revenue£60,842.62

21.5%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

35.9%62.9%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

3 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

6staff

4 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

215pupils

2017/18

Page 20: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

20 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Clackmannanshire

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

5.3%

1.7% – 8.9%

6.7%

5%

0.6%

0.6%

Capital£949,000.00

Revenue£75,000.00

27.4%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

31.9%51.1%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

7 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

940staff

4 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

1,431pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

33.3%

Page 21: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

21Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Dumfries & Galloway

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

2.8%

0% – 5.8%

6%

5.5%

1.2%

1.4%

Capital£1,174,577.00

Revenue£152,442.00

20%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

36.4%56.8%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

7 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

3,335staff

32 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

6,449pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

38.4%

Page 22: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

22 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Dundee City

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

8.5%

3.4% – 13.6%

4.5%

2.6%

1.5%

1.1%

Capital£1,800,000.00

Revenue£100,000.00

44.8%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

25.7%80%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

9 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

8,166staff

4 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

3,162pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

52.9%

Page 23: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

23Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

East Ayrshire

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

2.7%

0% – 5.4%

4.4%

4.4%

0.2%

0.4%

Capital£126,515.00

Revenue£70,074.00

24.1%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

35.8%54.4%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2016/17

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

1 Cycling Friendly Employer

employing

4,449staff

6 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

2,623pupils

Page 24: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

24 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

East Dunbartonshire

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

3.9%

0.8% – 7%

4.6%

3.8%

1.3%

1.2%

Capital£2,000,000.00

Revenue£96,000.00

14.6%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

43.7%61.1%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

2 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

383staff

17 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

5,841pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

15.2%

Page 25: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

25Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

East Lothian

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

3.6%

0.8% – 6.4%

12.1%

10.4%

3.1%

2.7%

Capital£1,518,000.48

Revenue£291,092.00

21.5%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

35.9%51%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

2 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

504staff

13 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

5,555pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

41.2%

Page 26: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

26 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

East Renfrewshire

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

3.7%

0.4% – 7%

4.3%

3.6% 0.3%

Capital£420,000.00

Revenue£100,000.00

18%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

34.3%41.3%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

6 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

4,836staff

28 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

11,142pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

100%

Response rate too low

Page 27: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

27Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Edinburgh, City Of

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

11.9%

9% – 14.8%

7.1%

6.2%

4%

1.7%

Capital£2,427,452.00

Revenue£631,000.00

39.3%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

34.9%71.2%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2016/17

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

139 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

62,509staff

29 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

17,128pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

60.2%

Page 28: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

28 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Eilean Siar

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

2.6%

0.4% – 4.8%

4.6%

5.5%

0.7%

1.1%

Capital£136,330.00

RevenueNot supplied

19.6%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

30%54.4%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

0 Cycling Friendly Employers

8 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

310pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

95.5%

Page 29: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

29Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Falkirk

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

5.4%

2% – 8.8%

4.5%

4.5%

0.3%

0.7%

Capital£411,255.10

Revenue£224,626.00

26.7%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

33%70.1%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

8 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

6,143staff

21 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

12,468pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

6%

Page 30: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

30 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Fife

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

4.7%

2.1% – 7.3%

4.2%

4.1%

0.5%

0.6%

Capital£2,820,153.00

Revenue£14,758.00

28.9%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

34.5%61.3%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

20 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

9,079staff

13 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

4,431pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

22.2%

Page 31: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

31Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Glasgow City

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

5.4%

3.5% – 7.3%

4.3%

3.2%

0.5%

0.6%

Capital£5,592,195.00

Revenue£317,087.00

44.1%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

27.1%71.1%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2016/17

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

160 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

72,344staff

14 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

5,262pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

34.8%

Page 32: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

32 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Highland

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

11.7%

7.1% – 16.3%

2.9%

2.2%

0.1%

0.2%

Capital£786,119.60

Revenue£208,251.00

15.2%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

54.3%56.7%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

21 Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

3,309staff

11 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

4,123pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

21.1%

Page 33: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

33Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Inverclyde

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

1.1%

0% – 2.8%

0.9%

1.2%

Capital£182,556.00

RevenueNot supplied

37.1%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

27%63.2%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2016/17

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

0 Cycling Friendly Employers

9 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

2,513pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

15%

Response rate too low

Response rate too low

Page 34: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

34 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Midlothian

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

0.5%

0% – 1.5%

9.1%

7.3%

0.7%

0.6%

Capital£1,353,808.00

Revenue£135,434.00

21.6%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

31.4%51.7%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2016/17

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

6Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

2,095staff

23 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

8,593pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

75%

Page 35: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

35Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Moray

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

9.1%

4.3% – 13.9%

5.2%

6.6%

3.8%

2.8%

Capital£63,500.00

Revenue£174,000.00

18.7%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

46.4%60.5%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

3Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

1,065staff

9 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

2,505pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

40%

Page 36: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

36 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

North Ayrshire

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

2.7%

0.3% – 5.7%

5.8%

5.1%

0.7%

0.6%

Capital£126,515.00

Revenue£70,074.00

30.4%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

36.7%48.6%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2016/17

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

7Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

3,755staff

7 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

1,435pupils

Page 37: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

37Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

North Lanarkshire

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

1.5%

0% – 2.9%

3.7%

3.6%

0.5%

0.2%

Capital£299,937.10*

Revenue£272,600.00*

28.9%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

23.8%60.8%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017/18

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Estimated figures.

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

4Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

4,565staff

10 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

5,132pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

10.1%

Page 38: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

38 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Orkney Islands

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

6.4%

2.5% – 10.3%

6.1%

4.9%

3.0%

6.4%

CapitalNo data

RevenueNo data

15.2%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

47%60.4%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

1Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

5staff

4 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

1,129pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

63.2%

Page 39: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

39Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Perth & Kinross

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

2.7%

0% – 5.6%

6.7%

6.2%

1%

1.3%

21.1%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

45.5%49.1%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

11Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

4,502staff

23 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

5,117pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

50.7%

Capital£1,169,248.76

RevenueNot supplied

2017/18

Page 40: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

40 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Renfrewshire

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

2%

0% – 4.1%

3.5%

3%

0.2%

0.4%

27.8%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

29.6%56.9%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

9Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

3,077staff

5 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

2,384pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

22.4%

Capital£327,019.30

RevenueNot supplied

2017/18

Page 41: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

41Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Scottish Borders

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

2%

0% – 4.6%

4.6%

4.9%

0.4%

0.6%

19%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

38%54.2%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

1Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

2,500staff

12 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

6,142pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

31.1%

Capital£546,135.16

Revenue£60,842.62

2017/18

Page 42: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

42 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Shetland Islands

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

1.3%

0% – 2.9%

3.8%

4.9%

1.2%

0.9%

12.9%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

30.1%59.8%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

2Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

202staff

9 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

1,091pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

100%

Capital£65,949.00

Revenue£144,000.00

2017/18

Page 43: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

43Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

South Ayrshire

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

1%

0% – 2.8%

5.1%

5.5%

0.5%

0.8%

23.8%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

38.4%60.1%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* This is based on infrastructure construction and omits design work undertaken.

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

6Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

5,587staff

18 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

6,023pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

82.9%

Capital£439,554.76*

Revenue£142,743.74

2017/18

Page 44: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

44 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

South Lanarkshire

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

1.8%

0.2% – 3.4%

3.8%

3.2%

0.1%

0.2%

23.7%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

26.3%50.8%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

9Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

4,903staff

21 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

7,555pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

38.7%

Capital£377,000.00

Revenue£5,600.00

2017/18

Page 45: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

45Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

Stirling

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

3.6%

0.8% – 6.4%

8.1%

7.9%

1.4%

2.1%

19.8%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

42%55.6%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

17Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

8,095staff

19 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

6,103pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

71.8%

Capital£575,004.00

Revenue£134,350.00

2017/18

Page 46: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

46 Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

West Dunbartonshire

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

3.1%

0.3% – 5.9%

1.4%

1.9%

0.4%

0.7%

31.9%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

27.5%64.4%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

8Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

2,732staff

7 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

1,574pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

56.3%

Capital£81,500.00

Revenue£55,000.00

2017/18

Page 47: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

47Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019

West Lothian

Proportion of journeys under 5km

Households with access to one or more bikes for private use

Pupils cycling to primary school

Employees cycling to work usually/regularly

Pupils cycling tosecondary school

Households with no access to a car for private use

4.1%

1.0% – 7.2%

5.1%

5.5%

0.7%

0.6%

25.4%

Headline trends and context

Workplaces Schools Active travel budget*

39.3%61%

Range with 95% confidence intervals

2017

2011–16 Avg

2017

2011–16 Avg

* Method of financial calculations will vary by council. Figures provided by local area may not capture full spend.

4Cycling Friendly Employers

employing

630staff

10 Cycling Friendly Schools

reaching

4,350pupils

Percentage of primary schools delivering Level 2 Bikeability

Scotland training

10.6%

CapitalNo data

RevenueNo data

Page 48: Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 · Cycling Scotland Annual Cycling Monitoring Report 2019 07 Frequency of cycling journeys3 Cycling to work4 Main mode of commuting to work –

24 Blythswood SquareGlasgow G2 4BG0141 229 5350www.cycling.scot

Cycling Scotland is a Scottish Charity, SC029760, regulated by the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR)


Recommended