SRM Institute of Science and Technology,
Kattankulathur
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
AUDIT REPORT
1. Audit process
2. Audit formats
3. Internal Audit report
4. External Audit report
5. Faculty meeting follow-up
6. Audit outcomes
Academic Audit Process
Objectives of Academic Auditing
1. To ensure that the teaching-learning process is carried out effectively in the department since
it is an important attribute that enhances the POs and COs attainment.
2. To sustain the quality of evaluation approaches, the answer script is scrutinized
3. To confirm the quality of question paper setting, it is scrutinized based on Bloom’s Taxonomy.
4. To sustain the academic performance of students, they are monitored and tracked at different
level.
5. To ensure the consistent of curriculum with the recent trends and the evaluation of PEOs is
monitored periodically.
The following AAMC members are responsible for conducting audit in EEE department
Academic Activities Monitoring Committee (AAMC)
Members Designation
Dr. K.Vijayakumar HOD/Chairperson
Dr.R.Jegatheesan Professor/ Member
Dr. A.Rathinam Professor/ Member
Dr.N.Chellammal Associate Professor/ Member
Dr.J. Preetha Roselyn Associate Professor/ Member
To keep checking on the effectiveness of changes and processes for possible corrective actions and
results the following attributes are listed below
List of Audit Attributes and Action taken in the audit
S.
N
o
Audit
Attributes
Activities to be
audited
Responsible
person
Frequenc
y
Action
taken
Result
1 Student
performance
1.University
result
2. Cycle test
performance
3.Attendance
percentage
Faculty advisor
and subject
handling faculties
Twice in
a
semester
Letter to
parents
Remedial classes, counseling
is being conducted for the
courses and pass percentage
has been increased.
2 Academic
surveys
1. Employer
survey
2. Graduate
survey
3. Alumni
survey
4. Course exit
survey
Faculty meeting Once in a
Semester/
year
Communicat
ed to HOD
for
continuous
improvement
Discussed in the board of
studies to improve the
program PEOs and COs.
Based on the above-mentioned academic audit activities, the following actions are identified.
1. Student performance:
• Student’s performance in university exam is monitored once in a semester by their
respective faculty advisor and their performances in the internal assessments are also
3 Quality of
question
paper
1. University
question paper
2. Cycle test
question paper
along with
answer key
Dr. R.Jegatheesan Thrice in
a
semester
Report is
submitted to
HOD
Bloom’s taxonomy
implemented and standard is
improved.
4 Answer
script
evaluation
Cycle test
answer script
evaluation
Dr.A.Rathinam Thrice in
a
semester
Report is
submitted to
HOD
Uniformity in evaluation is
confirmed.
5 Feedback
system
Midsem and end
sem feedbacks
by the students
in academia
portal
HOD and Faculty
advisor
Twice in
a
semester
Analysis of
the feedback
and
corrective
actions is
taken by
HOD
Teaching methodology is
refined. E-learning platform
is used like MOODLE, to
help the students.
6 Teaching-
Learning
methodology
1. Surprise visit
to class
2.Monitoring
the teaching
material
Dr.R.Jegatheesan/
HOD
Once in a
Semester
Report is
submitted to
HOD
Performance is improved by
asking them to take swayam
(NPTEL) courses and other
online courses
7 Curriculum
planning
Academic
surveys
HOD and BOS
member
Once in a
Semester
Corrective
action is
carried out in
BOS
Suggest the measures to
improve the program and
curriculum changes are
made.
8 Course file
evaluation
Course file of
each subject
Dr.N.Chellammal
Dr.J.Preetha
Roselyn
Once in a
Semester
Consolidated
for
attainment
analysis
Course and program
outcomes are assessed and
attainment level is realized.
9 Student
grievances
Class committee
meeting
Academic advisor
and Faculty
advisor
Thrice in
a
semester
Minutes are
sent to HOD
with
corrective
action.
Student representative
meetings are conducted and
almost all the issues are
sorted and grievance cell is
formed
1
0
Course
planning
Course
committee
meeting
Course
coordinator and
subject handling
faculties
once in a
semester
Minutes are
communicate
d to HOD
Faculties attend online
courses like Swayam
(NPTEL),coursera, edx, etc,
well in advance and equip
themselves.
continuously monitored and it is communicated to the parents after getting concurrence
from HOD.
• Fast learners are identified and they are encouraged to attend many competitions,
workshops and also motivated to do MOOCs courses in thrust areas.
• Fast learners are also encouraged to work in joint venture with the faculties to publish
their work in any reputed journals.
• Slow learners are categorized and they are insisted to get the help from the faculty
through APPE (Academic Performance and Placement Enhancement) Process.
2. Academic surveys
Department employs a variety of surveys to collect information from outgoing students,
employers, alumni, parents and present students. Faculty advisors are responsible for gathering the
above-mentioned surveys, consolidate and report the result to the curriculum planning committee for
continuous improvement.
3. Quality of question paper
Course coordinator prepares the question paper after discussing with other subject
handling faculties. Three cycle test question papers are scrutinized by the audit team along with answer
key. Question papers are checked according to blooms taxonomy and the corrections are intimated to
the respective question paper setter and the changes are carried out immediately.
4. Answer script evaluation
All the course handling faculties will submit the corrected answer script to the
scrutinizing committee and few sample papers will be checked and the corrections are reported to the
respective faculty. Answer script will be distributed to the students after this evaluation.
5. Feedback system:
During the faculty appraisal, student’s feedback is one of the measuring metrics for the
recommendation of increment and promotion. This analysis is carried out by the head of the department.
Further, HOD insists the faculty to attend faculty development programme to improve their teaching
skill. In addition to that, they are also encouraged to take MOOCs course to enhance their skill.
6. Teaching- Learning methodology
A randomized observation in the class is carried out by HOD and other senior faculty
in the department to improve the teaching methodology of the faculty. After this surprise visit, feedback
will be given to the concerned faculty for their improvement.
7. Curriculum planning
All the faculties handling the course will give feedback about their course based on the
surveys conducted, their expertise, students’ feedback and evaluation of COs, POs and PEOs. Industry
experts, Employers, Alumni, Board of study members, Students and faculties are involved in curriculum
and syllabus planning and development.
8. Course file evaluation
• The faculty members provide the feedback on the course and program outcomes and session
plan for further improvement at the end of the course. Every question asked during the
assessment process, namely Surprise Test, cycle test 1, cycle test 2 and cycle test 3 is mapped
with the course and program outcomes of that course. At the end of each test, the sample of
answer sheets is taken for assessment by the faculty to check their attainment of the course and
program outcomes of that course.
• All these are arranged and submitted as the course file for the respective course. From this
course file, the faculty members get to know about which outcomes are met and which are not
through the test results, and are thus able to revise their teaching methodology wherever
necessary.
• Course file is evaluated to verify the lesson plan and PO attainment. The comments of the
evaluations are communicated as the corrections to the concerned faculty and recommended
for the changes.
9. Student grievances
Student’s grievances in the course and other facilities are discussed in the class
committee meeting which happens at regular interval (Thrice in a semester). This meeting is conveyed
by academic advisor and minutes are recorded and communicated to HOD with corrective action.
10. Course planning
In the beginning of the semester, a meeting is conveyed by the course coordinator to
the other subject handling faculties. In this meeting, session plan is discussed and circulated to the
students after getting HOD approval. The required actions for the successful attainment of PO are
discussed and it is recorded in the minutes.
Audit formats
EMPLOYER SURVEY
ALUMNI SURVEY
SRM IST
Annual Performance Evaluation (PE) Form for Faculty – Academic year (July 2019-June 2020)
Name : Emp. ID :
Designation : Department :
Mobile No. : Official E-Mail ID :
Activity Functional Area MaxPoints Self HOD HR
Teaching
Teaching assignment∑( No of credits per subject taught * No of students)< = 200 – 2 Points, 201 to 399 – 4 Points400 to 599 – 6 Points, 600 to 699 – 8 Points,> = 700 – 10 Points
10
Pass Percentage100 % - 3 Points, 90 to 99 % - 2 Points, 75 to 89 % - 1 point 03
Efforts taken to improve the performance of the slowlearners with proof.
1. Remedial classes, 2. Students counseling foracademic low performers, 3. Counseling thefrequent absentees. (Maximum three activities)
06
Teaching Resource Creation (Recorded video lecture oftheory and laboratory experiments, New teaching aiddevelopment like delivery of lectures through LMS,…………………… (Maximum 3 activities)
06
P.G Project Guidance.2 and above Projects – 02 Points, 1 Project – 01 Point 02
U.G. Project Guidance.3 and above Projects – 03 Points, 2 Projects – 02 Points, 1Project – 01 Point
03
Year coordinator/academic advisor. (2 points each). StudentCounsellor / class in charge / UG Course Coordinator/Timetable Coordinator / Project Evaluation CommitteeMember/Project Coordinator/any other. (Each 1 Point)
05
Faculty development programme organized/attended,Online course passed (each 1 point) 02
Student feedback average of all theory / lab classes10 - 03 Points, 9 to 9.99 – 02 Points, 8 to 8.99 – 01 Point 03
Research
Papers Published in Indexed JournalsSNIP / IF < 0.3 – 1 Point Per Paper, 0.3 to < 0.5 – 2 Points,
0.5 to < 1.0 – 3 Points, 1.0 to < 2.0 – 4 Points, 2 to < 3 – 5Points. Max. Points(15)First/Corresponding author 100%2nd author 50%3rd and above author 25%
15
Book Chapter (1 Point) / Editor of a Book. (2 Point)(indexed only) 02
Patents Filed -1 pointpatents published – 2 points 02
Patents Granted / Commercialized 04
SRM funded project-Interdisciplinary - 2 points,Others - 1 point 02
No. of Ph.D. Students graduated (1 Point Per Candidate) 02
Completed consultancy work certified by the Industries(Upto Rs.1 Lakh – 1 Point, > Rs. 1 Lakh – 2 Points) 02
Establishment of a laboratory in collaboration with anindustry 02
Collaborative work with foreign Universities (Applying forjoint funded project – 2 points, Funded successfully- 3points, Collaborative Joint Publication – 2 Points
03
National / International awards / Fellowship of reputedsociety 02
Externally funded project in the first year of fund release:1. Funding upto Rs.25.00 lakhs – 3 points2. Funding > Rs. 25.00 < 50.00 lakhs – 5 points3. Funding >Rs50.00 lakhs – 10 points
10
Services
Accreditation Activities(Report Preparation / Communication) – NAAC, ABET,UGC, NIRF, AACSB etc.,University level coordinator – 3 points, Department level –1 point
03
Alumni Coordinator/Placement coordinator (1 point) andInteraction with industry for bringing a new company forplacementsCompany with turnover less than 1 cr – 1 pointCompany with turnover More than 1 cr – 2 pointsNo. of Alumni visited SRM Min 3 – 1 point, >3 – 2 Points
03
General Administration (Convocation / Admission /Counseling, etc.) 03
Professional Society Activities (IEEE, ISTE, ISA, CSI, etc)Office bearers at Society Level / University Level 03
Membership in relevant professional Societies1 Point per Society 02
Total 100
Signature of the Faculty Signature of HOD
Dean/Chair of School Dean, CET
Pro VC
SRM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF EEE
SCRUTINY OF INTERNAL TEST QUESTION PAPER
Subject code/Name:
Semester/year:
Academic year: ODD/EVEN
Type of assessment: CT1 / CT2 / CT3
Date of submission:
Name of the coordinator:
Slno Description Yes/No Remarks1 Subject code, name, duration,
date of exam.2 Adherence to question paper
pattern3 Weightage of mark4 Justification of weightage with
answer key5 If analytical
subject-Checking/justifying datain numerical problems
6 Question paper format withCO/PO mapping
7 Is Blooms taxonomy levelfollowed
8 Uniformity of line space, fontsize, style
9 Grammatical error, spell check,Typographical error
10 Clarity of images11 Repetition of action verbs12 Declaration by the coordinator
for confidentiality.
The question paper and key are recommended for PRINTING/RESUBMISSION.
Signature of Coordinator Signature of Scrutiny member
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Scrutiny of Answer Script-Internal Test
Name of the Faculty:
Subject code/Name: Semester/year:
Type of assessment: CT1 / CT2 / CT3 Date of submission:
Slno Description Yes/No Remarks
1 Answer key with proper mark
split-up
2 Is the evaluation of the answer
script done as per answer key?
3 Are the evaluated marks entered
in the front sheet of question
paper?
4 Is the totaling of mark, correct?
5 Whether the mark is awarded
against each answer.
6 Necessary comments to the
evaluation or feedback are
mentioned in the answer script.
7 Is step marks awarded according
to answer key?
8 Is zero mark entered for wrong
answer?
9 Is over writing of marks noticed
in answer script?
10 Any other comments/suggestion
by scrutiny member.
The Answer scripts are recommended for
DISTRIBUTION TO THE STUDENTS ( )
REVALUATION AND RESUBMISSION ( )
Signature of Scrutiny member
Samples
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYSRM University, Kattankulathur
(ACADEMIC YEAR : AY2018-19-EVEN)
SUBJECT WISE FEED BACK REPORT
(Mid Sem)
15EE302(Power System Protection) handled by Mr.D.Ravichandran(101741)
Program Semester Strength GivenB.Tech 6 57 57
S.No. Question Description Excellent Very Good Good Average Poor Rate
1 Punctuality 22 7 14 13 1 7.26
2 Sincerity 21 7 14 14 1 7.16
3 Subject Knowledge 23 7 13 13 1 7.33
4 Lecture Preparation 22 7 13 14 1 7.23
5 Communication & Presentation Skills 21 6 14 14 2 7.05
6 Coverage of Syllabus as per Schedule 23 7 12 14 1 7.30
7 Controlling of the Classes 22 6 16 13 0 7.30
8 Standard of Test Questions 23 7 13 13 1 7.33
9 Discussion of Test Questions 21 7 13 14 2 7.09
10 Fairness in Evaluation 22 8 12 14 1 7.26
11 Interaction & Approachability 22 7 10 16 2 7.09
12 Helping for Clarification of Doubts 20 8 13 14 2 7.05
13 Knowledge Gained at Present on the Subject 22 10 9 13 3 7.23
14 Overall Rating of the Teacher 23 9 11 13 1 7.40
Final Rating of the Teacher 7.22
✍ SIGNATURE OF STAFFReport Date:27-Aug-20 ✍ SIGNATURE OF HOD
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
SRM University, Kattankulathur
(ACADEMIC YEAR 2016- 2017)
Arihant Vakil Department Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Registration Number RA1511005010238 Name
Program B.Tech
Semester 3 Batch :1
Mobile No 9596899095 Email ld :[email protected]
Lot Tot.ADS Attn % Test Performance Slot Hrs Hrs Course Course Title Type Faculty Name Code
titative Aptitude & Theaw Mrs. S. Sumathi (90100008)
CT10 0o CT2/10.0o CT3/20.00 ST/5.00 QA5.00 29.6/ .009 5.00 11.50 5.005.00 A 24 15PD201 Logical Reasoning -
Mr.JOB JULIA Theory (102116) 3 88.o0CT1/10.00 CT2/15.00 CT3/15.00 STI5.00 QAWs.00
8.80 12.00 9.00 5.00 A25 15LE202E French Language| 5.00
4 92.59 CT/10.00 CT2/15.00 CT3/15.00 ST/S.00 QA/5.00 11.50 3.00 5.00
Ms.D.Anitha 15EE206 Digital Systems Theory B 54 7.40 8.25 (101711)
Transforms and Ms.N.SubashiniTheory (101487) 9 83.33 CT1/10.00 CT2/15.00 CT3/15.00 ST/5.00 QA/5.00
6.90 54 15MA201 Boundary Value
Problems 5.20 7.50 4.00 4.00
15EE205 Electromagnetic Theory
6 85.71CT110.00 CT2/15.00 CT3/15.00 ST/5.00 QA/5.00
5.00 5.00 Ms.R.C.llambirai
Theory (100311) D 42 12.8 7.40 9.00
Ms.C.Nithya (101359)
4 89.47C10.00 CT2/15.00 CT3/15.00 ST/5.00 QA/5.00 6.80 6.30 E 38 8.25 5.00| 5.00 15EE204 Electrical Machines-1 Theory
Theory Sharmini (101290) 5 88.64 C no0 CT2/15.00 CT3/15.00 STI5.00 QA/5.00
11.50 7.50 5.00 5.00 Electron Devices and Ms.K.Subha 44 15EE208 Circuits 3.00
Generation,
15EE213 Transmission and
CT1/10.00 CT2/15.00 CT3/15.00 STI5.00 QA/5.00
6.00 7.80 Theory (101427) Ms.S.Lourdu Jame 51 6 88.24 (3.45) 4.50 4.50
Distribution
2 91.67EXp/40.00Rec/5.00 MCQ/5.00 Prc MT/10.00
4. 50 15EE204LElectrical Machines 204 Laboratory
Ms.C.NithyaPractica (101359) LAB 24 291.67 38.00 5.00 7.25
15EE209LAnalog and Digital Circuits Lab
PracticalMs.N.Kalaiarasi
Practical (100287) 100.00EXp/40.00 Rec/5.00 MCQ/5.00 Prc MT/10.00
33.44 3.80 3.00 9.50 LAB 288
Minimum Pass Mark in Theory Courses is 50%
75% Attendance is compulsory to appear in the end semester exams for each subject.
CT1 Cycle Test 1:CT2 Cycle Test 2:CT3 Cycle Test 3:MT Model Test,ST -Surpnse Test:OA Quiz and Assignments
REMARKS:
GRood BD A to pvolo n estore.d hjecs.
ADDRESS H. No. 17 Sector-1/B East Extension Trikuta Nagar Jammu Jammu Jammu & Kashmir- 180012
Dean) HOOD Mr.S.Senthil Murugan (Faculty Advisor)
Date:07-Nov-16 UNIVERS
attank ulathu
SPM
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYSRM University, Kattankulathur
(ACADEMIC YEAR : AY2018-19-EVEN)
SUBJECT WISE FEED BACK REPORT
(Mid Sem)
15EE302(Power System Protection) handled by Mr.D.Ravichandran(101741)
Program Semester Strength GivenB.Tech 6 57 57
S.No. Question Description Excellent Very Good Good Average Poor Rate
1 Punctuality 22 7 14 13 1 7.26
2 Sincerity 21 7 14 14 1 7.16
3 Subject Knowledge 23 7 13 13 1 7.33
4 Lecture Preparation 22 7 13 14 1 7.23
5 Communication & Presentation Skills 21 6 14 14 2 7.05
6 Coverage of Syllabus as per Schedule 23 7 12 14 1 7.30
7 Controlling of the Classes 22 6 16 13 0 7.30
8 Standard of Test Questions 23 7 13 13 1 7.33
9 Discussion of Test Questions 21 7 13 14 2 7.09
10 Fairness in Evaluation 22 8 12 14 1 7.26
11 Interaction & Approachability 22 7 10 16 2 7.09
12 Helping for Clarification of Doubts 20 8 13 14 2 7.05
13 Knowledge Gained at Present on the Subject 22 10 9 13 3 7.23
14 Overall Rating of the Teacher 23 9 11 13 1 7.40
Final Rating of the Teacher 7.22
✍ SIGNATURE OF STAFFReport Date:27-Aug-20 ✍ SIGNATURE OF HOD
Audit report
SRM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
Date of audit: : 8th June 2018 Time : 10:00 AM
Academic Year : 2017-2018
EXTERNAL ACADEMIC AUDIT FORM
Name, Designation and Address of Academic Audit Experts:
1. Dr. S. Arul Daniel
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
National Institute of Technology,
Trichy-620 015,TamilNadu-India.
2. Dr.S.Chandramohan,
Professor,
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
Anna University, Chennai.
1. Number of faculties in the department : 71
Faculties with Ph.D in % : 23
Faculties without Ph.D in % : 48
2. Number of papers published by faculties: 54
3. Number of patents filed by faculties : 13
4. Number of online courses attended by faculties:52
5. Number of conference/workhop
Organized by faculties : 4
Attended by faculties : 95
6. Number of Ongoing Faculty Research Projects: 3
7. Number of Faculty recognized as research guides:8
8. Number of research scholars enrolled : 8
9. Number of research scholars graduated : 5
10. Number of activities conducted in alumni association: 7
11. Number of extension activity conducted : 1
12. Number of consultancy obtained : 1 (Temasek)
13. Number of students placed : 242
14. Whether the vision, mission and PEOs are properly framed and periodically reviewed according to the inputs
from stakeholders?
Yes. Periodically reviewed using stakeholders surveys.
15. Whether the Incentives / awards / recognitions are received by faculty?
Yes. But guidelines to be made transparent.
16. Whether the Library resources are effectively used to augment teaching – learning?
Need to improve and should be updated in the website,
17. Whether the teachers have opportunities for continued academic growth and professional
development?
Yes. But not used those opportunities.
18. Whether the deparment provides for inter‐institutional credit transfers?
Awareness should be given to the students to get benefitted.
19. Whether the faculty takes initiative in the curriculum revision based on the feedback from
stakeholders.?
Yes. Course feedback survey is obtained from the faculty at the end of every course.
20. Whether the progress of the students are monitored and communicated to the students and their
parents?
Letter to parents is followed for all internal test and end semester exam.
21. Whether there is any mechanism for promoting faculty participation in research (providing seed
money, grants, incentives, other facilities).
Yes. However, many faculties doesnot use these facilities.
22. Whether the significant number of research articles are published in reputed / referred journals?
Need to improve the publication in SCI journals.
23. Whether the Infrastructure facilities are being utilized optimally?
Yes
24. Whether the budgets are optimally utilized and allocated for various activities in the department?
No. need to be properly channeled.
25. Whether the stock register and service records are maintained in all the labs in the department?
Service records are not maintained in many labs.
26. Whether efforts are made by the deparment to minimize the drop out rate and facilitate the students
to complete the course.?
Monitored. But appropriate steps to be taken.
27. Whether there is any intiatives for developing entrepreneurial skills among the students?
Alunmi activities related to the development of entrepreneurial skills to be initiated.
28. Whether the CO/PO attainment analysis are performed and conveyed to all the faculties in the department?
Yes. Recorded in facuty minutes.
29. The assessment tools used for the computation of CO & PO attainment are adequate.
Yes. Done as per the requirement.
30. Whether the course coordinators have conducted the course committee meeting as per the guidelines?
Yes. Course committee meeting is conducted as per the guidelines.
31. Whether the faculty has prepared the course file as per the directions of HoD?
Checked by AAMC member.
32. Whether the Blooms taxonomy level is appropriately marked in the question paper?
Yes. To be explicitly mention in 2018 question paper.
33. Whether the question paper and answer script are scruntinized?
Yes. Scruntinized.
34. Is any new innovation teaching methodologies followed in this academic year?
Yes.To be followed for courses whereever required.
35. Whether the department has planned remedial classes for slow learners?
Yes. Need to track the final outcome
36. Is the students’ attendance record maintained for both regular and special coaching classes?
Yes.
37. Is there any proper mechanism available to collect student feedbacks?
Yes. Collected through academia portal.
38. Is there any practice to monitor the student feedback and teaching-learning process?
Yes. Need to regularize.
39. Is there any process to handle student’s grievances?
Monitored through class committee meeting, suggestions received by HOD and university level grievance
cell is also avaiable.
Audited by
1. Dr. S. Arul Daniel
2. Dr.S.Chandramohan
Signature of the Auditor Signature of the Auditor
Dr.S.Chandramohan, Dr.S.Arul Daniel
Professor, Professor,
Department of EEE, Department of EEE
Anna University, Chennai. NIT Trichy
SRM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
Date of audit: : 8th June 2018 Time : 10:00 AM
Academic Year : 2017-18
CONSOLIDATED EXTERNAL ACADEMIC AUDIT REPORT
Observations: (Best Practices)
1.Outcome based learning is followed for B. Tech students
2.Question paper and answer scripts are scrutinized and records are properly documented
3.Students and faculty monitoring system records are properly maintained.
4.Student’s placement training is done effectively and placement record is good.
4.Course committee, class committee and faculty meeting minutes are recorded and follow-up actions
are carried out.
Observations: (Description of Gaps)
1.More than 40% of faculties are without Ph.D.
2.Publication in referred (SCI) journals need to be improved.
3.Number of Funded projects need to be increased.
4. Industrial experts can be invited for lectures to bridge the gap between academic and industries.
5. Faculties academic growth and professional development to be improved.
Signature of the Auditor Signature of the Auditor
Dr.S.Chandramohan, Dr.S.Arul Daniel
Professor, Professor,
Department of EEE, Department of EEE
Anna University, Chennai. NIT Trichy
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
SRM UNIVERSITY, KATTANKULATHUR -603203.
MINUTES OF MEETING
DATE : 17/7/ 2018
TIME : 12:30 PM
VENUE: EEE – CONFERENCE HALL
Agenda: To analyse the CO, PO and PSO attainment level for various second year and third year courses for the 2015-19 and 2016-20 batch students
SI
No. DESCRIPTION DISCUSSION RESPONSIBLE PERSON
In the opening remarks, Head of the department welcomed all the members present for the meeting.
1 IO/SO attainment of all second-year
subjects (2017-18 odd & Even) of
the third year subjects (2017-18 odd
& Even)
HOD asked all the course coordinators to present the IO and
SO attainment of the core courses for the discussion.
Course coordinators
2
Post audit recommendations
HOD gave a brief description on Academic Audit conducted. The
faculties were insisted to produce at least two research
papers from student’s project to increase the publications. At
least the faculties those who have completed Ph.D. were
asked to submit project proposal. The project coordinators
were asked to encourage the final year students to subject
project proposal.
AAMC members and all faculties
3 Suggestions for action
taken/improvement.
Regarding the PO attainment analysis, it was decided to
submit the suggestions for the improvements to AAMC after
discussing in the course committee meeting.
Course coordinators and AAMC
members
The PO calculated for the courses undergone by students admitted in the academic year 2015-16 during the third-year course of study was discussed in the
meeting.
S.No. Course
Code
Course title PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
1 15EE300 Comprehension Target 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Attainment 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 15EE301J Power Electronics Target 3 3 - - - 1 1 - - - - -
Attainment 3 3 - - - 1 1 - - - - -
3 15EE302 Power System Protection Target 3 3 - - - 1 - - - - - -
Attainment 2.47 3 - - - 1 - - - - - -
4 15EE303 Discrete Transforms and
Signal Processing
Target 3 3 1.5 - - 1 1 - - - - -
Attainment 2.22 2.13 1.04 - - 0.62 1 - - - - -
5 15EE304 Power System Analysis Target 3 2.75 - - - - - - - - - -
Attainment 0.76 0.7 - - - - - - - - - -
6 15EE305J Microcontrollers Target 3 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - -
Attainment 3 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - -
7 15EE306M Multi-Disciplinary Design Target 3 2 3 - - - - 1 - - - 1.5
Attainment 3 2 3 - - - - 1 - - - 1.5
8 15EE375L/
15EE385L
Minor Project I/
Massive Open Online
Courses - I
Target
- - 3 - 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3
Attainment - - 3 - 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3
9 15EE376L/
15EE380L Minor Project II/Seminar I
Target - 3 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3
Attainment - 3 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3
10 15EE390L Industrial Training Target - - - - - - 3 3 - 3 - 3
Attainment - - - - - - 3 3 - 3 - 3
Courses like 15EE302- Power System Protection, 15EE303- Discrete Transforms and Signal Processing, 15EE304- Power System Analysis did not meet few
program outcomes attainment level required for the respective course. Therefore, the course coordinators were instructed to decide the plan of action for the
forth coming academic year for the respective courses for improvement.
The PSO attainment for the third-year courses studied by the students admitted in the year 2015-16 was also analysed in the meeting
S. No Course code Course title PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
1 15EE300 Comprehension 3 3 1
2 15EE301J Power Electronics 2 2 -
3 15EE302 Power System Protection 2.47 3 1.64
4 15EE303 Discrete Transforms and Signal
Processing 1.35 0.74 -
5 15EE304 Power System Analysis 0.53 0.54 -
6 15EE305J Microcontrollers 3 3 -
7 15EE306M Multi-Disciplinary Design 3 3 3
8 15EE375L/15EE385L Minor Project I/Massive Open Online
Courses - I 3 3 3
9 15EE376L/15EE380L Minor Project II/Seminar I 3 3 3
10 15EE390L Industrial Training 3 3 3
Similarly, these courses like 15EE302- Power System Protection, 15EE303- Discrete Transforms and Signal Processing, 15EE304- Power System Analysis did
not meet few program specific outcomes also. Therefore, the course coordinators were instructed to decide the plan of action for the forth coming academic
year for the respective courses for improvement.
PSO attainment for second year courses for students admitted in the year 2016-17 was also analysed in the meeting.
Course code Course title PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
15EE204 Electrical Machines I 1.12 1.03 0.5
15EE204L Electrical Machines Laboratory I 2 2 1
15EE205 Electromagnetic Theory 0.59 0.49 -
15EE206 Digital System Design 0.44 1.4 -
15EE207 Electrical and Electronics Measurements and Instrumentation 0.93 1.87 -
15EE208 Electron Devices and Circuits 0.58 0.62 -
15EE209L Analog and Digital Circuits Laboratory 2 2 -
15EE210 Electrical Machines II 0.48 0.95 -
15EE210L Electrical Machines Laboratory II 1 2 -
15EE211 Control Systems 2.03 2.23 0.64
15EE212L Measurements and Control Systems Laboratory 1 2 -
15EE213 Generation, Transmission and Distribution 2.1 1.77 1.77
After the PO attainment analysis for the courses undergone by students admitted in the academic year 2016-17 during their second year, the following points
were discussed in the meeting regarding the attainment of COs. POs and PSOs.
S.No Course Code Course title PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
1 15EE204 Electrical Machines I
Target 3 1.5 - - - 1 - - - - - -
2015 batch 1.47 0.61 - - - 0.87 - - - - - -
2016Batch 1.54 0.82 - - - 0.33 - - - - - -
2 15EE204L Electrical Machines Laboratory I
Target 2.67 1.5 - 1.33 1 - - - - - - -
2015 batch 3 2 - 1 1 - - - - - - -
2016Batch 2.67 1.5 - 1.33 1 - - - - - - -
3 15EC204J Linear Integrated Circuits
Target - 1 3 3 2 - - - - - - -
2015 batch - 0.77 2.32 2.31 1.54 - - - - - - -
2016Batch - 0.87 2.53 2.6 1.73 - - - - - - -
4 15EE205 Electromagnetic Theory Target 2 2 - - - 1 - - - - - -
2015 batch 1 1 - - - 0.37 - - - - - -
2016Batch 0.56 0.56 - - - 0.24 - - - - - -
5 15EE206 Digital System Design
Target 3 2 2 - 1 1 1 - - - - -
2015 batch 2.3 1 1 - 1 0.75 0.75 - - - - -
2016Batch 1.58 1.2 1.2 - 0.7 0.65 0.65 - - - - -
6 15EE207 EE Measurements and
Instrumentation
Target 3 1 - - - - - - - - - -
2015 batch 2.4 0.84 - - - - - - - - - -
2016Batch 1.64 0.63 - - - - - - - - - -
7 15EE208 Electron Devices and Circuits
Target 3 2 2 - - - - - - - - -
2015 batch 0.6 0.43 0.87 - - - - - - - - -
2016Batch 0.86 0.33 0.67 - - - - - - - - -
8 15EE209L Analog and Digital Circuits
Laboratory
Target 3 2.67 2.75 2 - - - - - - - -
2015 batch 3 2.67 2.75 2 - - - - - - - -
2016Batch 3 2.67 2.75 2 - - - - - - - -
9 15EE210 Electrical Machines II
Target 2.67 2 - - - 1 - - - - - -
2015 batch 1.45 0.81 - - - 0.73 - - - - - -
2016Batch 1.33 0.85 - - - 0.29 - - - - - -
10 15EE210L Electrical Machines Laboratory II
Target 3 3 - 1 - - - - - - - -
2015 batch 3 3 - 1 - - - - - - - -
2016Batch 3 3 - 1 - - - - - - - -
11 15EE211 Control Systems
Target 3 3 3 - 2 1 - - - - - -
2015 batch 1.09 0.72 1.09 - 0.73 0.36 - - - - - -
2016Batch 2.05 2.15 2.15 - 1.43 0.72 - - - - - -
12 15EE212L Measurements and Control Systems
Laboratory
Target 3 - - 1.67 - 1 - - - - - -
2015 batch 3 - - 1.67 - 1 - - - - - -
2016 Batch 3 - - 1.67 - 1 - - - - - -
13 15EE213 Generation, Transmission and
Distribution
Target 3 2.5 - - - 1 - - - - - -
2015 batch 1.98 1.65 - - - 0.8 - - - - - -
2016Batch 2.1 1.52 - - - 0.77 - - - - - -
PO attainment analysis based on the second-year courses attainment level:
15EE204:
• CO1, CO3, CO4, CO5 has not attained the level and CO2 has attained the maximum attainment level required for the course.
• All POs has attained 60% level of attainment required for the course
• All PSOs has attained 70% level of attainment required for the course
15EE204L:
• CO1 to CO3 has attained the maximum attainment level required for the course.
• PO1 and PO4 has attained 90% and PO2 has attained more than the level of attainment required for the course
• All PSOs has attained the level of attainment required for the course
15EE205:
• The COs has not the attainment level required for the course
• All POs has attained 50% level of attainment required for the course
• All PSOs has attained 80% level of attainment required for the course
15EE206
• CO1 and CO2 not attained the level and CO3 has attained the maximum attainment level
• PO1, PO2, PO3 has attained 70% and PO6, PO7 and PO5 has 90% attainment level for the course.
• PSO1 and PSO2 has attained 70% of the attainment level.
15EE207
• CO1 to CO3 has not attained.CO4 and CO5 has attained the target attainment level
• PO1 has attained 60%, PO2 has attained 85% of the attainment level
• PSO1 and PSO2 has attained 70% level of attainment
15EE208
• CO1, CO2, CO3 has not attained the attainment level required for the course
• PO1 and PO3 has attained 40% and PO2 has attained 60% of the attainment level
• PSO1 and PSO2 has attained only 40% level of attainment
15EE209L
• All the COs has attained the maximum target level required for the course
• All POs and PSOs has attained the maximum attainment level required for the course
15EE210
• CO1 and CO3 has not attained the target level and CO2 attained the attainment level required for the course
• All POs and PSOs has attained only 60% of the attainment level of the course.
15EE210L
• CO1, CO2 has attained the attainment level required for the course
• All POs has attained the level of attainment
• All PSOs has attained more than the attainment level required for the course
15EE211
• CO1 and CO3 has not attained and CO2 and CO4 has attained the attainment level required for the course.
• All POs has attained only 70% level of attainment required for the course.
• All PSOs has attained 80% level of attainment required for the course.
15EC204J:
• The CO1 to CO5 has attained the target attainment level and CO6, CO7 did not attain the attainment level required for the course
• All POs has attained 90% of the maximum attainment level required for the course
• All PSOs has attained 85% of the maximum attainment level required for the course
15EE213
• CO2, CO3 did not attain the target level for CO attainment.CO1, CO4 and CO5 has attained the target attainment level required for the course
• PO1 and PO2 has attained 70% and PO6 has attained 90% level of attainment
• All PSOs has attained 85% level of attainment required for the course.
Suggestions for action taken/Improvement:
• It is decided to increase the CO/PO attainment level from 60% to 65% for the second-year courses from the next academic year.
• Course coordinators of the semester 2018-19(ODD) are insisted to observe the attainment analysis and take the necessary action for the further
improvement of all the above-mentioned course for the next batch (2017-2021).
• The course coordinators are instructed to educate the course handling faculties about the action to be implemented to bridge the shortfall in CO-PO
attainment for the previous batch.
• The action plan in the CO-PO attainment should be discussed in course committee meeting of the respective course.
HOD/EEE
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
SRM UNIVERSITY, KATTANKULATHUR -603203.
MINUTES OF MEETING
DATE : 22.07.2019
TIME : 12:30 PM
VENUE: EEE – CONFERENCE HALL
PRESENCE OF: AAMC MEMBERS AND OTHER EEE FACULTIES
Agenda: To review the attainment of CO, PO and PSO for all the core courses offered EEE department students and take necessary actions.
SI
No. DESCRIPTION DISCUSSION RESPONSIBLE PERSON
In the opening remarks, Head of the department welcomed all the members present for the meeting.
1 CO/PO attainment of all second-
year, third year and final courses
(2018-19 odd & Even)
HOD asked all the course coordinators to present the CO and
PO attainment of the core courses for the discussion.
Course coordinators
2
Post audit discussion
Audit observations were discussed in the meeting and it was
informed to course coordinators to implement blooms
taxonomy in question paper. The lab in charges were asked
to create awareness about the modern equipment in their lab.
Project coordinators and faculties were instructed to
encourage students to do industrial projects. All faculties
were informed to use at least one modern teaching
methodology for their course. Alumni coordinators and
faculties were instructed to bring alumni for motivating
students to do higher studies and prepare for placement.
AAMC members and all faculties
3 Suggestions for action
taken/improvement.
After the analysis, it was decided to submit the suggestions
for the improvements to AAMC after discussing in the
course committee meeting.
AAMC members and course
coordinators
The PSO attainment level for the courses undergone by students admitted in the academic year 2015-16 during the final-year course of study was also discussed
in the meeting.
Course code Course title PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
15EE401 Solid State Drives 2 2 -
15EE401L Electric Drives Laboratory 2 2 -
15EE402 Power System Operation and Control 1.73 2 1.07
15EE403L Power System Laboratory 2 2
15EE496L Major Project 3 3 3
The PO attainment level for the courses undergone by students admitted in the academic year 2015-16 during the final-year course of study was discussed in
the meeting.
S.No Course Code Course title PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
1 15EE401 Solid State Drives Target 3 2.33 2 - - 1 1 - - - - -
Attainment 3 2 2 - - 1 1 - - - -
2 15EE401L Electric Drives Laboratory Target 3 3 - 3 2 2 - - - - - -
Attainment 3 3 - 3 2 2 - - - - -
3 15EE402 Power System Operation
and Control
Target 3 3 - - - 1 1 - - - - -
Attainment 2.3 2.6 - - - 1 1 - - - -
4 15EE403L Power System Laboratory Target 3 3 - 3 2 2 - - - - - -
Attainment 3 3 - 3 2 2 -
5 15EE496L Major Project Target 3 3 3 - - 3 - 3 3 3 3 3
Attainment 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
In 15EE402 Power system operation and control PO1, PO2, PSO1 and PSO3 are not attained. Except in this course the PO and PSO are attained in all other
final year core courses.
The PSO attainment level for the courses undergone by students admitted in the academic year 2016-17 during the third-year course of study was also discussed
in the meeting.
Course code Course title PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
15EE300 Comprehension 3 3 1
15EE301J Power Electronics 2 2 -
15EE302 Power System Protection 2.93 3 1.96
15EE303 Discrete Transforms and Signal Processing 1.52 0.88 -
15EE304 Power System Analysis 1.24 1.27 -
15EE305J Microcontrollers 3 3 -
15EE306M Multi-Disciplinary Design 3 3 3
15EE375L/15EE385L Minor Project I/Massive Open Online Courses - I 1.89 1.89 1.89
15EE376L/15EE386L Minor Project II/Massive Open Online Courses - II 3 3 3
15EE390L Industrial Training 3 3 3
The PO attainment level for the courses undergone by students admitted in the academic year 2016-17 during the third-year course of study was discussed in
the meeting.
S.No. Course
Code
Course title PO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
1 15EE300 Comprehension
Target 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2015 Batch 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2016 Batch 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 15EE301J Power Electronics
Target 3 3 - - - 1 1 - - - - -
2015 Batch 3 3 - - - 1 1 - - - - -
2016 Batch 3 3 - - - 1 1 - - - - -
3 15EE302 Power System Protection
Target 3 3 - - - 1 - - - - - -
2015 Batch 2.47 3 - - - 1 - - - - - -
2016 Batch 2.93 3 - - - 1 - -
4 15EE303 Target 3 3 1.5 - - 1 1 - - - - -
Discrete Transforms and Signal
Processing
2015 Batch 2.22 2.13 1.04 - - 0.62 1 - - - - -
2016 Batch 2.42 2.27 1.11 - - 0.82 1
5 15EE304 Power System Analysis
Target 3 2.75 - - - - - - - - - -
2015 Batch 0.76 0.7 - - - - - - - - - -
2016 Batch 1.65 1.5 - - - -
6 15EE305J Microcontrollers
Target 3 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - -
2015 Batch 3 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - -
2016 Batch 3 2 2 - 2 - -
7 15EE306M Multi-Disciplinary Design
Target 3 2 3 - - - - 1 - - - 1.5
2015 Batch 3 2 3 - - - - 1 - - - 1.5
2016 Batch 3 2 3 - - - - 1 1.5
8 15EE375L/
15EE385L
Minor Project I/
Massive Open Online Courses - I
Target - - 3 - 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3
2015 Batch - - 3 - 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3
2016 Batch - - 3 - 3 0.51 0.77 0.51 3 3 3 0.77
9 15EE376L/
15EE380L Minor Project II/ Seminar I
Target - 3 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3
2015 Batch - 3 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3
2016 Batch
10 15EE390L Industrial Training
Target - - - - - - 3 3 - 3 - 3
2015 Batch - - - - - - 3 3 - 3 - 3
2016 Batch 3 3 3 3
After the PO and PSO attainment analysis for the courses undergone by students admitted in the academic year 2016-17 during the third year of study, the
following points were discussed in the meeting regarding the attainment of COs. POs and PSOs.
15EE302- Power System Protection:PO1 and all the PSO of this course is not attained
15EE303- Discrete Transforms and Signal Processing: Except PO7 all the other PO and PSO are not attained
15EE304- Power System Analysis: All the PO and PSO did not attain the maximum attainment level of the respective course.
Few third-year courses did not meet few programs outcomes attainment level required for the respective course. Therefore, the course coordinators were
instructed to decide the plan of action for the forth coming academic year for the respective courses for improvement.
The PO attainment level with 65% target for the second-year courses for the academic year 2018-19 was discussed in the meeting.
S.No Course code Course title PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
1 15EE204 Electrical Machines I 0.79 0.39 - - - 0.28 - - - - - -
2 15EE204L Electrical Machines Laboratory I 2.67 1.5 - 1.33 1 - - - - - - -
3 15EC204J Linear Integrated Circuits - 1.1 2.65 2.77 2.12 - - - - - - -
4 15EE205 Electromagnetic Theory 1.4 1.4 - - - 0.63 - - - - - -
5 15EE206 Digital System Design 1.02 0.55 0.55 - 0.31 0.29 0.29 - - - - -
6 15EE207 Electrical and Electronics Measurements and
Instrumentation 1.48 0.48 - - - - - - - - - -
7 15EE208 Electron Devices and Circuits 0.89 0.31 0.62 - - - - - - - - -
8 15EE209L Analog and Digital Circuits Laboratory 3 2.67 2.75 2 - - - - - - - -
9 15EE210 Electrical Machines II 1.19 0.59 - - - 0.9 - - - - - -
10 15EE210L Electrical Machines Laboratory II 3 3 - 3 - - - - - - - -
11 15EE211 Control Systems 1.23 0.94 0.94 - 0.94 0.94 - - - - - -
12 15EE212L Measurements and Control Systems Laboratory 3 2.87 2.89 2.2 - - - - - - - -
13 15EE213 Generation, Transmission and Distribution 1.46 - - 1.09 - 0.67 - - - - - -
After the PO attainment analysis for the courses undergone by students admitted in the academic year 2017-18, the following points were discussed in the
meeting regarding the attainment of COs. POs and PSOs.
Few second-year courses did not meet few programs outcomes with 65% target. Therefore, the course coordinators were instructed to decide the plan of action
for the forth coming academic year (2019-20) for the respective courses for improvement.
Suggestions for action taken/Improvement:
• Course coordinators of the academic year 2018-19 were insisted to observe the attainment analysis and take the necessary action for the further
improvement of all the above-mentioned course for the next batch of students (2016-2020 and 2017-2021).
• The course coordinators were instructed to educate the course handling faculties about the action to be implemented to bridge the shortfall in CO-PO
attainment for the previous batch.
• The action plan for each CO, PO and PSO attainment should be discussed in course committee meeting for the respective course and submitted to
AAMC Committee.
• It was decided to increase the IO/SO target for the third-year courses from 60% to 65% from the next academic year.
• As per the recommendations given in the internal audit conducted on 19/7/2019 the following actions will be taken immediately.
1. Bloom’s taxonomy to be followed in all question papers.
2. Students should be made aware of facilities available in the department and encouraged to utilise it.
3. Students should be encouraged to do to internship and project in industries.
4. Guest lecture should be planned for every course and Alumni talk should be planned for every month.
HOD/EEE
Audit Recommendations and its Outcome Audited in 2018
HOD/EEE
S.No Audit Observation
2017-18(Audited in 2018)
Audit Outcome
1 More than 40% of faculties are without
Ph.D. Academic
Year
No. of regular faculty
with Ph. D
No. of regular
faculty with
M. Tech
2020-21 50 21
2019-20 30 39
2018-19 26 47
2017-18 17 55
2 Publication in referred (SCI) journals need
to be improved
3 Number of Funded projects need to be
increased
4 Industrial experts can be invited for
lectures to bridge the gap between
academic and industries.
Academic year No. of Guest
lectures arranged
2019-20 32
2018-19 7
2017-18 5
5 Faculties academic growth and professional
development to be improved.
Audit Recommendations and its Outcome Audited in 2019
S.No Audit Observation
2018-19
(Audited in 2019)
Audit Outcome
1 Bloom’s taxonomy
level to be mentioned
in question paper.
2 Recommended to
encourage the
students to undergo
internship and do
major projects in
industries
HOD/EEE
3 Involve more alumni
for motivational talk,
placement, and higher
studies.
4 Faculties to
implement modern
teaching
methodologies
5 Create awareness
about modern
equipment available
in the department
