Date post: | 07-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | tempus-websites |
View: | 227 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 1/15
Needs assessmentresults
Susanna Karakhanyan, PhD
Saturday, April 14, 2012Le Mans
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 2/15
Expert panel
• Koblenz-Landau University
• ASIIN – German Accreditation Agency specialized inAccrediting Degree Programmes in Engineering,
Informatics, the Natural Sciences
• Wrocław University of Technology
• Université du Maine
• Link Campus University of Malta
• National Center for Professional Education QualityAssurance, Armenia
4/14/20122
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 3/15
Needs Assessment
• ESG standards
• Two types of assessment
• Quality of the needs assessment• Status of the quality assurance
• Status of the quality assurance
• Grades
• Qualitative analysis
4/14/20123
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 4/15
Grading criteria
• To what extent quality assurance mechanisms are inplace
•
To what extent they are planned to be integrated• To what extent the planned activities are
implemented
•
To what extent the self-assessment mechanisms arechecked for validity and reliability
• To what extent the mechanisms are improved
4/14/20124
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 5/15
technical assessment
4/14/20125
Clearly described
Not clearlydescribed/misinterpreted
Lack of mechanisms
19
20
3
Overall 42 items: 6 universities x 7 ESGs
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 6/15
European standards and guidelines
• Policy and procedures for quality assurance
• Statements refer to strategic plan and academic standards rather thanquality assurance policies and procedures
• Approval, monitoring and periodic review of programmes and awards
•Policies and procedures exist, but it is not clear whether they are learningoutcome driven
• Assessment of students
• Policies and procedures exist and are publicly available but it is not clearwhether they are understandable for the students and are consistentlyapplied
• Quality assurance of teaching staff
• Policies and procedures for recruitment are not clear
• Teacher assessment is done at some universities but the object forassessment is the teachers rather than methodology
4/14/20126
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 7/15
European standards and guidelines
• Learning resources and student support
• There is description, somehow it is not clear how the resourcescorrespond to the needs of the students within each academicprogramme and whether they allow achievement of thelearning outcomes
• Information system
• There is some description of the information managementsystem, however, it is not clear how the university ensuresvalidity and reliability of the information collection and uses thatinformation in decision-making.
• Public information
• There are some tools for public information provision, however,it is not clear whether the university makes the information onquality assurance publicly available.
4/14/20127
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 8/15
Challenges for the upcoming workshop
• Getting to common understanding of what quality isfor us and what it should serve
•
Getting to common understanding on theapproaches to quality assurance: output vs. processapproach
• Getting to common understanding on European
Standards and Guidelines
• Launching development of university self-assessment mechanisms: mapping the activities tobe undertaken.
4/14/20128
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 9/15
Yerevan state academy of fine arts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Plan 2.25 2.25 3 3 2 1.75 2
Do 1.05 2.5 2.25 1 1.25 1.75 1.25
Check 0.75 1.62 1.25 0.75 0.87 1 1
Act 2 2.5 2 1.75 1.5 1.25 1.25
4/14/20129
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 10/15
Yerevan state university
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Plan 4 3.5 3.25 3.25 2.25 3.5 3.5
Do 2.75 2 3.75 4 2.5 3.5 3.75
Check 1.87 1.62 1.87 2 1.5 2.75 2.25
Act 2.25 1.75 1.75 2 2 2.5 1.75
4/14/201210
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 11/15
Gyumri state pedagogic university
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Plan 1.25 1.75 1.75 1 1.5 1 1.75
Do 1.75 1.75 1.75 2 1.75 1 1.5
Check 1.12 1.12 1.62 1.87 1.12 1 1
Act 1.25 1 1 1 1 1 1
4/14/201211
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 12/15
State engineering university of armenia
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Plan 4.25 3.5 3.5 3.75 3.5 3.5 3.5
Do 0.75 2.5 2.25 3 2.25 3 3
Check 1.87 2.75 2.5 2.5 2.25 2 2
Act 2 2 1.75 2 2 2 2
4/14/201212
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 13/15
Yerevan state medical university
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Plan 2.75 1.75 1 2 1.25 1.25 1.75
Do 2.75 1.25 2.25 1.75 1.75 1.25 1.75
Check 2.75 1.25 1 1.75 1.12 1.22 1.75
Act 2.5 1.75 1.5 1.75 2.25 1.25 1.75
4/14/201213
8/4/2019 ANQA Expert panel Evaluation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/anqa-expert-panel-evaluation 14/15
Vanadzor branch of state engineeringuniversity
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Plan 2 2.5 2.25 2.25 2.25 2 1.5
Do 1.25 2.5 2.5 1.25 2 2 1.57
Check 1.75 2.2 1.14 1.57 1.85 1.57 0.71
Act 2 1.75 0.75 2 2 2 1.5
4/14/201214