Chapter 5b: Mutual Coupling inAntenna Arrays
Antennas and Propagation
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 2
Definition
IEEE Standard Definitions and Terms for AntennasDefines mutual coupling as follows:
2.244 mutual coupling effect (A) (on the radiation pattern of an array antenna). For array antennas, thechange in antenna pattern from the case when a particular feeding structure is attached to the array andmutual impedances among elements are ignored in deducing the excitation to the case when the same feedingstructure is attached to the array and mutual impedances among elements are included in deducing theexcitation.(B) (on input impedance of an array element). For array antennas, the change in input impedance of anarray element from the case when all other elements are present but open-circuited to the case when all otherelements are present and excited.
(A) ⇒ Radiation patterns are modified by nearby antennas.(B) ⇒ Input characteristics (like impedance) modified
In this lecture we will study this effect in detail.
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 3
Mutual Coupling Effect
From Standpoint of Radiation IntegralsWhat does placing an antenna nearby do?Change the boundary condition of the problemWill affect both radiation and terminal properties
Two scenariosDifferent function of
antennas
But, can be analyzedusing sameequations (a) Transmit Mode (b) Receive Mode
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 4
Transmit Mode
Intuitive Explanation of Modified RadiationDrive element mRadiated field intercepted by nCauses radiation from nTotal radiation is combination of m and nEffective radiation when we drive m
is thus changed
Input CharacteristicsPower radiated by n is intercepted
again by mChanges current flowing on mInput impedance at m is modified
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 5
Transmit Mode Analysis
Example 2-antenna systemLoad/drive port 1Goal: Find impedance/pattern
looking into port 2
Analysis
Clearly, the input characteristics at port 2 change due to what we connect at port 1!
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 6
Transmit Mode Analysis (2)
Radiation Pattern
Also, effective pattern of element 2 has changed due to load on antenna 1!
Pattern of kth antenna, other antennas “open circuit”
LetImportant note:
This is called an “embedded pattern”In contrast to “isolated pattern” ofsingle element
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 7
Receive Mode
Intuitive Explanation Plane wave impinges on element mCurrent flows on mPower reradiated (scattered!)Some reradiated power received by nThis causes radiation by element nSome power received by mCurrent on m is modified
Important PointEffective receive aperture of element m
depends on loading of element n(and vice versa!)
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 8
Mutual Coupling Effect
Severity Controlled byRadiation patterns of the two antennas
or distribution of near-fieldsSpacing of the antennaOrientation of antennasLoading
Ways to avoid couplingPlace elements far apartCareful design of antennas
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 9
Infinite Array
PurposeSimplifies analysisCan understand effect more intuitivelyAlso useful to analyze performance of
large arrays
AssumeRegular array of elements (uniform spacing)Identical elementsUniform phase shift driving / uniform plane-wave excitation
Leads toJust constant phase shift in signals from one element to next
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 10
Infinite Array: Transmit Mode
AnalysisVoltage on mnth element (element at mth row, nth column)
“Driving impedance” of mnth element
For uniform plane-wave excitaitonlinear phase shift across array of voc
because array is infinite, have linear phase shift of currents also!
Mutual impedance from pqth to mnth element.
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 11
Infinite Array: Transmit Mode (2)
ImplicationsDriving impedances of all the elements are identicalMakes analysis much simplerComplete system can be understood by driving 1 antenna
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 12
Infinite Array: Receive Mode
Infinite resistive sheet model
Reflection of sheet
Receive power is scan angle dependent.
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 13
Compensating Mutual Coupling
Practical Uses of Mutual Coupling?Reconfigurable antennas: modify pattern, matchingRFID / spatial modulation: send information by switching a load
Coupling normally detrimentalModifies radiation patterns of elementsComplicates analysis of arrayCan correlate signals
Compensation methods1. Matching-based methods2. Digital compensation
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 14
Matching-Based Methods
Method allows “perfect” decouplingDecoupling network:
Input reflection matrix is the Hermitian of the antenna reflectionMatrix extension of 1-port conjugate match
Design so Γ is 0 for reference impedance (Z0=ZL) Input characteristics / patterns of ports are independentProblem: Designing D.N. for large N!
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 15
Digital Compensation
Given: we know ZA and ZL
Measure v on array elementsCan use linear equations to get voc
For “minimum scattering” elements, voc of elementvery close to v on an isolated element (i.e. otherantennas not present)
Problems with Digital Compensation Requires detailed array calibration (ZA, ZL, embedded patterns)Signals corrupted before noise and quantization (info. loss)
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 16
Supergain / Superdirectivity
PhenomenonAllows high gain for small antennasMathematics shows it is possible
Not practical: why?High QHigh matching sensitivityLow efficiency (ohmic losses)
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 17
Supergain Analysis
ConsiderUniform linear arrayRadiation in azimuth (xy) plan (θ = π/2)Dipoles
Assume embedded patterns areapproximately same as isolated patterns(minimum scattering assumption)
Radiation pattern of array
ULA along x-axis
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 18
Supergain Analysis (2)
Radiation intensity in direction φ is
Radiation intensity of uniform radiator with same input power:
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 19
Supergain Analysis (3)
Goal: directivity in direction φ0 as large as possible
Problem:
or
Simplify by remove A from constraint.
Now, we have a new problem:
What is the solution?
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 20
From Linear Algebra
Optimization Problem
Solution
x = eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue of Arefer to this as the “dominant” eigenvector
For our Problem:
a′ = dominant eigenvector of G′(φ0)
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 21
Supergain Analysis (4)
Analyze N=2 elements: SimpleReveals main effect
For φ0=0 and N=2, eigenvectors are close to
(a) Odd mode (b) Even mode
For φ0=0, odd mode dominates
Let
Note: α is an arbitrary scale factor
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 22
Supergain Analysis (5)
For odd excitation radiated field is
Radiated power is
Radiation intensity of isotropic radiatoror U0 = Prad/(2π) = aHAa
Directivity becomes
Consider limit as kΔ→0
D0 = 2
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 23
Result of Supergain Analysis
Two ElementsOdd-mode excitationVanishing separationDirectivity D0=2For single antenna D0=1
MeaningCan put two dipoles as close together as we likeGet twice directivity of single dipoleIf we pack in N, get factor of NCan make a tiny antenna as directive as we likeContradiction?
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 24
Result of Supergain Analysis (2)
Consider Antenna Weights
Now, as separation diminishes
MeaningFor finite radiated power,Antenna weights become infinite!
Currents are infinite but opposite
Not practicalHigh ohmic lossesHigh sensitivity
For most analysesSet constraints to avoid supergainsolutions
J1 = +∞ J2 = -∞
Chapter 5bAntennas and Propagation Slide 25
Summary
Mutual Coupling in Antenna ArraysAntenna elements affect each otherNetwork characteristicsRadiation patterns
CompensationPossible through decoupling network
or digital (SP) calibration
Supergain effectCoupled dipoles can have higher gain than uncoupledMostly mathematical. Should be avoided in real designs.