•11/24/2014
•1
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Antennas, Antenna Systems & Radio Propagation 2014
PhD course 24-28 Nov 2014
Aalborg University
Room A6-111
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Schedule
http://kom.aau.dk/~pe/education/phd/AASRPC2014/AASRP_2014_phd.html
•11/24/2014
•2
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
ParticipantsNAME email institute
Nestor Hernandez
Emil Buskgaard
Ehsan Foroozanfard
Alex Oliveras Martinez
Jakob Lindbjerg Buthler
MATIULLAH KHAN
Karthikeya G. S Gulur
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Criteria
• Be present– Max 20% absence
– Sign participation sheet for every ½day session
• Solve and hand-in exercises– No later than 2 weeks after end of course
– Acceptable solutions/level
• Have returned any loaned material in good shape
•11/24/2014
•3
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Resources and material for loan• You need
– online acces (AAU/I8 wireless access) to• see copy of slides and some of teh reading material• access to some of the measured data (some is BIG.. So wireless
download can be difficult)
– You need Matlab or similar hig level math/plotting package, to process expeirmental as part of exercises
• We could arrange for material you could loan during the course– Notebooks (Windows)– Memory sticks
• Can be used to hold/transfer measured data
• You have to sign for the loan (agree to deliver back in same state as received .. at end of course)
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 2014
Signal -> link transition : channel impact SNR
• AWGN -> Fading
• Channel changes BER statistics drastically•http://www.raymaps.com/index.php/bit-error-rate-of-qpsk-in-rayleigh-fading/ber2/
•11/24/2014
•4
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 2014
Channel impact : Doppler/Speed• Channel phase dynamics : Irreducible
BER floor
•http://ratnuu.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/the-theoretical-ber-under-fading/
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 8
Propagation channel elements
Signal dynamics
Base
Mobile
Path loss
Transmission range
Localmeans
Global mean
Inverse power law
Shortterm
Link budget
IIII
II
I : Path loss
Power decay : global mean, d-n
II : Shadow fading
Blocking : local mean, log-normal
III : Short term fading
‘Vector interference’ : Rayleigh, Rice
Traditional distinctions for vehicular case. For handsets/nearfield terminals can
be near impossible to seperate these effects
•11/24/2014
•5
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 9
Wave types
Power dependence
vs range = ?
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 10
Fresnel zones
=> ellipsoids•Fresnel zones : 180 phase difference•o
l d h d h d d d d h d d
l l d d
hd
hd
hd
hd
hd d
12 2
22 2
1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2
1 2 21 1
1 1 1 12
12
2
22
2
12
2
22
2
12
22
; ,
l nh
d dh r
nn
d d
2 2
1 12
12
22 1 1
12
22
as their property is a constant path lenght 'l'from focus to contour, and next focus point
•11/24/2014
•6
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 11
Smooth surface reflection
Reflection coefficient
Dielectric constant
Grazing incidence, small : v h 1 1; ;
v v
h
very small n
unconditionally
1 1 2 1
1
2, ; ,
,
c very large :
h v
c c
c c
,
sin cos
sin cos
2
2
c r r rj j
0
60
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 12
Plane earth (2-path) model
dd
hhdd
hhhhddd
rtdddd
rtrt
;2
41111
;;
2
2
2
2
22
22
2222
Sum signal
240
22
0
2222
0
22
4
...sincos1...14
d
hhP
d
hh
dP
jed
PP
rtrt
jr
•11/24/2014
•7
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 13
Empirical path loss model
L [dB]
Log(range) [km]
2-path, n=4Regression, n=3.8
L=Clutter loss
clutter
Measurement
L
Measured power law d-n, typical n=3 to 5
Lreference=L2-path or Lregression or other power law
Signal(d-n)=1/Loss(dn)
n = path loss (power law) exponent
L=L + L ( ,R,h ,environment)2-path clutter b
Classification -> clutter constants
Experiments = big money
Urban, suburban, rural etc.
define how? -> operator experience
Frequency, Range, Hb and environment
Extra treatment for Terrain obstacles
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 14
Link margin & budget• Link Budget
– Output power + Ant gain – cable losses– Path loss -> estimate/predict via models– Local mean variation -> provide ‘safety’
margin– Fast fading -> provide ‘safety’ margin– Receiver sensitivity for given spec BER or
QoS
Local mean -> distribution[dB] & spatial variation dependence [m]
40dBm
Lc=-6dB Ga=20dB Path loss Lp = -80dBShadow Ls=-6dB
Tx Power Rx Power
-52dBm
Fading = -20dB
•11/24/2014
•8
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 15
Multiplicative effects
1
2
34
Shadow lossL(x)
R
xL(R) = L(x)Global loss
L x L x L x L x L x L x L x
L L L L L L
N n
N
N n
N
1 2 3 41
1 2 31
.....
log log log log ... log log
Central limit theorem
Log(L) is asymptotically normal distributed. Approx. n=>8 sufficient
S s s
P S e
n n
n n n
nn
n
u
n n
n
n
; : ,
lim
,
2
21
2
2
2
Normal (Gaussian) probability density function (pdf)
Error function, cumulative distribution function (cdf)
f u N , 2
F u f x dx erf u Q uu
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Propagation channel elements
III. Short term fading
(vector interference)I. Path loss
(global decay d-n)
II: Shadow fading
(blocking, local mean)
•11/24/2014
•9
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
The two-source model (unidirectional)
2
sin2
22
00
000 2
k
exrekLkxja
j
eeaejaeaexE
xjkLj
kLkxjkLkxjkLjkLkxjkxj
x
L
’Frozen time’ – only look at space dependance
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
What does it look like?
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 20
0.5
1
1.5
2
x in
|E|
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2-100
-50
0
50
100
x in
Pha
se in
deg
rees
•11/24/2014
•10
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
The 2 source model: random directions
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
The two source model: 2 directions
•11/24/2014
•11
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Rayleigh fading
y
ii
x
iiii ajajaE sincosexp
Central limit theorem:•x, y are sums of a large number of random variables.
•x,y can be assumed to be
•Gaussian distributed,
•independent,
•zero mean
•of the same variance
•Joint probability density function (pdf)
2
22
2
2
2
2
22
2
2
2
2
22
1
2
1
2
1,
yxyx
eeeypxpyxp
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Rayleigh fading: from cartesian to polar
rrJ
rryxr
y
r
x
r
yxJ
ry
rx
x
y
ryx
erjyxE j
22
222
sincoscossin
sincos
,
,
sin
cos
arctan
2
2
2
22
22
2
22
2
2,,
2
1,
r
yx
er
yxpJrp
eyxp
•11/24/2014
•12
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Rayleigh fading: from joint to the marginals
2
1,
,
2,,
0
22
2
0
22
2
2
2
2
2
drrpp
er
drprp
er
yxpJrp
r
r
Uniform distribution of the angle
Rayleigh distribution of the envelope
Phase and envelope
are related as?
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Pdf of the Rayleigh distribution
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Amplitude
PD
F
•11/24/2014
•13
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Cdf of the Rayleigh distribution
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Amplitude
CD
F
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 2010
-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Amplitude in dB
CD
F
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Doppler shift
Doppler shift -
R
d
far fieldR>>d
•Envelope r, envelope or power gradient
•Phase , phase gradient d/dd
•Max. Doppler shift : fd,max = 1/ [c/m]
•Actual Doppler shift : fd= fd,max cos() [c/m]
•Temporal : fd [Hz] = fd,[c/m] v[m/s]
2-source
2/,2/mod
2/cos2
2/sin
2/2sin22/sin2
½2/0
max,
Lxsignx
Lxkkadx
xdrxr
LxkLxksignx
LxfaLxkaxr
Lx
d
•11/24/2014
•14
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Power azimuth distribution:
Antenna Gain:
How much power from each direction:
Multiple sources: Doppler spectrum
G
Gpx
y
What is the Doppler frequency:
α
p
ffff d cosmax,
Power spectrum due to a small range of angles da:
22
max,
2
max,max,max,
max, 1sincos
ff
GpGpbfS
df
ffdff
d
fd
d
df
dGpGpbdffS
d
ddd
d
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Example of Doppler spectrum
2
1p
4
1G
Omni directional source distribution
Omni directional antenna
22
max,22
max,
141
21
2ffff
fSdd
This is also known as the bathtub spectrum.
Put the limits
on the axes!
•11/24/2014
•15
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 2014
Rayleigh fading distribution functions
x
yQuadrature components
Phase Envelope
UncorrelatedGaussian (Normal)
UniformRayleigh
=arctan(Y/X) r=sqrt(X +Y )2 2
r
0 d
Jacobi transform
J=d(x,y)/d(r, )
p(r, )=p(x,y)|J|
Random-FMStudent's t
d /dd
d
'
Power gradientLog-Student's t
d|r| /dd2
d
20log(r)'
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 2014
Reminder: definition of correlation
2222
**
,vEvEuEuE
vEuEvuEvu
For Gaussian random variables:
envelopecomplexpower 2
Often needed
Easier to treat analytically
Why??
•11/24/2014
•16
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 2014
Spatial correlation• Correlation theorem:
Power density spectrum Auto-correlation
• How to find the Doppler spectrum from meas:
• For uniform angle of arrival
• When does the correlation =0?
2π∆d/λ=2.512 or equivalently ∆d=0.4λ
fSFddrdrEdR
smRHzscmcS
enveloper1
,/,/
dJdRr 20
2fHfS
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Wideband : A simple example
•11/24/2014
•17
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
The more general case
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
How does it look at reception?
•11/24/2014
•18
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Dispersion metrics
• Delay spread= Standard deviation of power delay profile (pdp)
• Defined similarly to Doppler spread.
• Delay spread is a fundamental limitation because of
–irreducible bit error rate (BER),
–receiver complexity
2 hpdph
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
How to find it for a discrete channel
We can convert to expectation over space instead, why?
•11/24/2014
•19
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
How to calculate the ds
Where is the error in the expression??
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
NB vs WB: it’s all relative
•11/24/2014
•20
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Channel classificationEnvironment spread - system bandwidth product
Temporals [s] BW [Hz]
f
|h( )|
|H(f)|FFT
sBW<<1 sBW=1 sBW>>1Quasi narrowband :Selective fading butpaths not resolved
Wideband :Selective fading,paths resolved
Narrowband :Flat fading
=> Channel classification / wideband is RELATIVE!
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Wideband models
• Tapped delay lines often used
• Often Rayleigh distributed taps, but might include other distributions and/ or LOS component
• Mean tap power determined by the pdp
iN
iii tjtth
1
exp,
•11/24/2014
•21
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Implications of tap delay line models
• Tap delay line model = transversal filter• Used for discrete model implementation • HW/SW emulators/ simulators
• If the inter-tap delay becomes comparable to the bit time, successive symbols interfere with each other= InterSymbol Interference (ISI)
a0 a1 a2 a3 a4
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
COST 207/ GSM: PDPs
•11/24/2014
•22
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Transfer function- typical urban
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Deterministic transfer functions: ’INSTANT’
• Four equivalent system functions (one specific ’sample’ of channel) :– h: Time/space variant impulse response– T: Time/space variant transfer function– S: Spreading function ->radar target scattering function– H: Doppler variant spreading function/transfer function
• Doppler Spatial fading, Delay Frequency fading
• 2 variables (space, time) (Doppler, frequency)
S(fd,)
h(x,)
T(x, f)
H(fd, f)
F
F
F
FF-1
F-1F-1
F-1
•11/24/2014
•23
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Stochastic 2x2 wideband model: ’AVERAGE’
• Time invariant stochastic models are described by Correlation functions/ Power density spectra
• Stochastic correlation functions: General multipath ..’trend’
Rh(x1, x2, 1, 2)
RS(fd1, fd2, 1, 2) R(x1, x2, f1,f2)
RH(fd1, fd2, f1, f2)
FF
FF
FFFF
FF-1FF-1
FF-1
FF-1
R(x1,x2,y1,y2)=E[h(x1,y1)h*(x2,y2)]
2 param’s/ domain: 2x2 representation with 4 param’s each.
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
WSSUS: Wide Sense Stationary Uncorrelated Scattering
• Stationarity: shift invariance
• Wide sense stationarity (WSS)
• Uncorrelated scattering (US)
tttttt nnxxpxxp ,,,,
11
xRxxR
21,
fixed
R
•11/24/2014
•24
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
WSS vs US duality behaviours
• Correlation domain behaviour:
• WSS: shift invariance in space, uncorrelated Doppler shifts
• US: singularity in t, shift invariance in f
(from time-frequency duality- Bello)
• ‘US’ in one domain ‘WSS’ in translated domain
xhFfHffff
xxxxx
ddddd
,,
,
1221
1221
hFfHfffff
,,
,
1221
1221
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Deterministic vs. WSSUS channels
Deterministic channel
WSSUS Equivalence WSSUS specials
Space variant impulse response function
h(x,) Rh(x,x+,1,2) = E[h(x,1) h*(x+,2)] = (2-1) Ph(x,1)
Ph(0, 1)= S is power delay profile (PDP)
Output Doppler scattering function
H(fd,f) RH(fd1,fd2,f,f+f) = E[H(fd1,f) H*(fd2,f+f)] = (fd2-fd1) PH(fd1,f)
PH is the Doppler-frequency cross-power spectral density
Doppler-delay scattering function
S(fd,) RS(fd1,fd2,1,2) = [S(fd1,1)S*( fd2,2)] =(fd2-fd1) (2-1) PS(fd1,1)
PS is the Doppler-echo cross-power spectral density (= radar target scattering function )
Space variant transfer function
T(x,f) RT(x,x+x,f,f+f) = E[T(x,f) T*(x+x,f+f)] = RT(x,f)
RT(0,f) is the frequency coherence function
•11/24/2014
•25
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
WSSUS 2x2 wideband model
Ph(x,)
PH(fd,f)
RT(x,f)PS(fd,)
F
F-1F
F-1
F
F-1F
F-1
WSSUS reduces correlation description with two paramters pr description,
i.e. 1 parameter pr domain
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014
Function: pdp
•11/24/2014
•26
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 51
DIVERSITY : WHAT IS GOOD FOR?• REMEMBER????????
– Estimation of wireless communication quality• Link budget, margins etc
– Examplify dependence of differenet paramter statistics• Exploit channel knowledge in one form to predict
impact in form usable for the modem/transceievr in question
– Present fundamental limits and methods to stablilise channel (improve com’s quality)• Diversity combing vs channel decorrelation
24/11/2014 51
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 5224/11/2014 52
Link margin & budget : margin <-> %• Link Budget
– Output power + Ant gain – cable losses– Path loss -> estimate/predict via models– Local mean variation -> provide ‘safety’ margin– Fast fading -> provide ‘safety’ margin– Receiver sensitivity for given spec BER or QoS
Local mean -> distribution[dB] & spatial variation dependence [m].If no other system choosen..you can use this budget as example /
starting point
40dBm
Lc=-6dB Ga=20dB Path loss Lp = -80dB
Tx PowerRx Power
-52dBm
Fading = -20dB
Shadow Ls=-6dB
MM1 MM2-5
•11/24/2014
•27
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 53
Diversity definition
• Idea: Repair through redundancy
• Transmit/ receive several replicas of the same information signal over (uncorrelated)channel conditions
• Correlation coefficient used as figure of merit2
complexpwrenv
2222
**
complex
vEvEuEuE
vEuE]E[uvρ
Complex : u,v Power : |u|2, |v|2 Envelope : |u|,|v|
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 54
Diversity combiners
• Selection: 1 branch active
• Summation: All branches active– Pre or post detection
• Criteria– Noise (RSSI)
– Interference (RSSI, ISI)
– Time dispersion (ISI)
?? How would you detect time dispersion problems in a radio modem?
•11/24/2014
•28
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 55
Selection (ONE branch active)
• IDEA: PICK THE BEST• Pure selection• Threshold selection
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 56
Other selection criteria
? Is there a yet simpler form .. May not requiring two full receivers??
•11/24/2014
•29
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 57
Gain combining (ALL branches active)• Equal gain
combining• Maximal ratio combining
Cophasing & summing
r1
G
r2
G
rM
G
Cophasing & summing
r1
a1
r2
a2
rM
aM
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 58
MRC: the math
M
iiout
i
iopti
M
iii
x
M
iii
M
iii
M
iii
x
M
iii
M
iii
M
iii
M
iii
iii
SNRSNR
N
ra
Na
Era
SNR
NanaEnoise
EraxraEsignal
naxray
nxry
1
*
1
2
2
1
1
22
1
2
1
2
1
11
,
If all Ni=N, i.e. noise floor equal
This reduces easily .. How?
•11/24/2014
•30
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 59
Mean gain (distribution shift)
M
kdiv k
snrsnr1
1
Selection vs. summing! (i.e. single branch active or all branches active ata time) Reference case : All SNR=equal, all env=0. RAYLEIGH FADING !!!!
Selection r = max(r1..rM) multi Rx (switch, scanning => single Rx):
Max. ratio p= ri2 ; multi Rx : weighted (with <SNR>) coherent addition
Equal gain r = ri /(MN) ; Multi Rx : coherent addition
(only 1.05dB difference to equal gain for M->)
41 11; MsnrsnrM
rr div
M
k k
r a r snr snr M SNRk kk
M
kk
M
1 1;
a r n r Nk k k k / /2
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 60
Instant gain (distribution compression)
• Selection combining
• Maximum ratio combining (max output snr)
• Equal gain combining, M=2
M
ssksdivM
ssk
snr
snrksnrsnrsnrsnrP
snr
snrsnrsnr
snr
snr
snrsnrp
exp1,Pr
exp1Pr,exp1
M
k
k
s
ssdivM k
snr
snr
snr
snrsnrsnrP
1
1
!1exp1
sssssdiv snrerfsnrsnrsnrsnrsnrP exp2exp12 Reference case : All SNR=equal, all env=0. RAYLEIGH FADING !!!!
N
ra
aN
ra
N
rsnr k
kM
k k
M
k kk
total
R ;2
1
2
2
12
•11/24/2014
•31
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 61
Comparison of MRC and SC
APNET
(c) Patrick Eggers 201424/11/2014 62
How does diversity affect the BER