+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

Date post: 04-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: smariano908
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 16

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    1/16

    The world at work:Matching jobs and skills

    in Asia

    McKinsey Global Institute

    December 2012

    CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARYAny use of this material without specific permission of McKinsey & Company is strictly prohibited

    ADB International Forum on Skills for Inclusive andSustainable Growth in Developing Asia-Pacific

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    2/16

    A billion non-farm jobs were created globally since 1980, 30% of thesecame from China and another 55% from other developing countries

    1 Includes 43 countries with GDP per capita less than $20,000 at 2005 PPP levels in 2010.2 Includes 25 countries GDP per capita greater than $20,000 at 2005 PPP levels in 2010.Note: Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

    SOURCE: United Nations Population Division (2010 revision); ILO Key Indicator of Labor Market index; local statistics for China and India;McKinsey Global Institute analyses

    157

    Non-farmjob creation

    473(60%)

    316

    Farmjob creation

    -34

    2010

    1980

    783310

    501344

    Farm Non-farm

    299663

    (69%)

    438

    88

    962

    436211 22592

    473227(48%)

    135

    82

    256

    246

    164 73 440

    30

    -43

    164

    604(95%)

    635

    513

    Evolution of labor force, 1980-2010Million workers (% of total)

    Other Developing1 Advanced2China India

    1

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    3/16

    19

    28 26

    -1

    5

    70619902010

    13

    20 18 1133

    India ChinaYoung

    Middle-IncomeAdvancedeconomies1

    201030E 615-2 30

    100%

    YoungDeveloping

    Russia& CEE

    SOURCE: United Nations population division (2010 revision); ILO; Global Insight; Oxford Economics; Economist; local statistics for China and India;McKinsey Global Institute analysis

    Through 2030, Chinas contribution to global labor force growth will drop;India and Young Developing economies will lead labor force growth

    1 Includes Young Advanced, Aging Advanced and Southern Europe clusters.NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

    Net new additions to labor force%; million workers

    China and Indiacontributed morethan a third of global

    labor force growth

    Young Developingeconomies and Indiawill contribute almost60 percent of globallabor force growth;ASEAN countries willcontribute 10%

    2

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    4/16

    China and India are likely to contribute more than half of the worlds

    supply of new workers with a college education through 2030

    SOURCE: United Nations Population Division (2010 revision); ILO; IIASA; local statistics for China and India; McKinsey Global Institute analysis

    1 Includes Young Advanced, Aging Advanced and Southern Europe clusters.NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

    12

    27

    Advanced economies

    Young Middle-Income

    China

    India

    Young Developing

    Russia & CEE

    19902010

    325

    210

    30

    18

    14

    201030E

    197

    48

    26

    23

    26

    Net labor force additions with college education%; million workers

    Share of the developedworld is likely to decline

    China and India togetherare likely to contribute57% of the growth inworkers with some collegeeducation

    ASEAN nations willcontribute ~8% of the

    growth in workers withsome college education

    3

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    5/164

    In the momentum case, the world is likely to have too few

    high-skill workers and not enough jobs for low-skill workers

    In China 23

    Inadvancedeconomies2

    1618

    Totalshortage

    3841

    SOURCE: McKinsey Global Institute analysis

    1 Low-skill defined in advanced economies as no post-secondary education; in developing, low skill is primary education or less2 25 countries from the analyzed set of 70 countries, that have GDP per capita greater than US$ 20,000 at 2005 purchasing power parity (PPP) levels

    in 20103 11 countries from the analyzed set of 70 countries, from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, with GDP per capita less than $3,000 at 2005 PPP levels

    in 2010

    13

    10

    16

    Gap between demand and supply of workers by educational attainment, 2020EMillion workers

    31

    13

    45

    In YoungDeveloping

    economies3

    InIndia

    Totalshortage

    15

    10

    19

    In India andYoungDevelopingeconomies

    58

    Inadvancedeconomies

    3235

    Totalsurplus

    8994

    10

    11

    10

    % of supply ofskill cohort

    % of demand forskill cohort

    Surpluses

    High-skill workers Medium-skill workers Low-skill workers1

    Shortages

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    6/16

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    7/16

    6

    Filling the gap implies need for a steep increase intertiary graduation rates for example, to 85% inChina, especially in technical and scientific fields

    SOURCE: UN Population Database, China National Bureau of Statistics, McKinsey Global Institute analysis

    1 Defined as ratio of output of tertiary graduates in year n to output of secondary graduates in year n-2.2 Includes projected addition of 18.6 million tertiary graduates over 2011-2020 through adult education under both momentum case and accelerated case,

    compared to addition of 15 million over 2001-2010

    Case

    010

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

    Accelerated case

    Momentum case

    Historical

    Stock of tertiarygraduates2

    Million, 2020

    168

    191Accelerated

    Momentum

    Projected deficit of23 million in supplyof tertiary educatedlabor force in 2020

    Projected

    Tertiary graduation rate1

    Percentage of students

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    8/16

    Educational attainmentPercent of working age population; million people, 2010

    Several developing Asian countries have low rates of secondaryschooling

    72

    5864

    56 58

    46

    29 30 3125

    19

    28

    32

    3235

    46

    49 54

    61

    61

    100% =

    Primaryor lower

    Secondary

    Tertiary

    China

    1,125

    8

    Sri Lanka

    16

    16

    Philippines

    60

    22

    Indonesia

    175

    8

    Pakistan

    112

    7

    Bangladesh

    102

    12

    Vietnam

    67

    5

    Thailand

    55

    14

    India

    850

    8

    Malaysia

    13

    20

    SOURCE: United Nations Population Division (2010 revision); IIASA; ILO; local statistics for India and China, McKinsey Global Institute analyses

    NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

    7

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    9/16

    Economies like India are likely to have too few mid-skilled workersand not enough job opportunities for low-skill workers

    SOURCE: National Sample Survey Organisation; India Census; Ministry of Human Resources and Development; McKinseyGlobal Institute analysis

    Million workers

    1 Gaps are percent of demand for shortages, and percent of supply for surpluses.NOTE: Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

    %1

    Comparison of projected labor demand and supply, 2020EMillion workers

    133

    120

    346319

    Primaryor lower

    Secondary

    Tertiary

    Supply

    540

    74

    Demand

    520

    68

    Gap

    +6 +8

    -13 -10

    +27 +7

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    10/16

    Across a range of countries, 39% of employers say a skills shortage is aleading reason for entry-level vacancies

    12

    3032

    3840

    45

    48

    5356

    Brazil Mexico SaudiArabia

    39%

    Germany UnitedKingdom

    MoroccoUnitedStates

    IndiaTurkey

    Lack of skills is a common reason for entry-level vacancies% of employer respondents

    36% of employers also reported a lack ofskills caused significant problems in terms ofcost, quality, and time or worse

    SOURCE: McKinsey survey, Aug-Sept 2012, Education to Employment: Making the system work, McKinsey & Company, 2012

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    11/16

    But educational providers, employers and youth live in parallel universes -for example, providers do not systematically estimate job-placement rates

    SOURCE: McKinsey survey, Aug-Sept 2012, Education to Employment: Making the system work, McKinsey & Company, 2012

    1 On average, what percentage of graduates from your institution find employment within 3 months of program completion?2 74% of employers said that over half of their graduates found jobs within 3 months, as compared with 54% of youth who did find jobs who said it took

    them 3 months .

    Provider perspective on job-placement rates and length of time to find a job1

    % of respondents able to estimate theirgraduates placement rates

    % of respondents

    54

    74

    % who

    findjobs inunder3 months

    Youthrespondentswho foundjobs

    Providerrespondentsestimate2

    17

    22

    29

    30

    33

    38

    39

    46

    75

    83

    78

    71

    70

    67

    62

    61

    54

    25

    Noestimate

    Able toestimate

    Morocco

    UnitedKingdom

    Germany

    Turkey

    SaudiArabia

    Mexico

    UnitedStates

    India

    Brazil

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    12/16

    Young people prefer hands-on learning, but not many providers aregeared to deliver this

    30

    30

    46

    54

    58

    62

    Online/distance learning

    Traditional lecture

    Seminars

    Multimedia

    Hands-on learning

    On-the-job training

    1 Now Im going to read out a number of different instructional techniques. I want you to rate how effective each technique is for your learning, using a11-point scale, where 0 means the technique is not at all effective and 10 means the technique is very effective. If you have not been exposed to thistechnique, please respond no exposure.

    2 On average, how much time did you spend in your academic program engaged in practical, hands-on learning versus theoretical learning? Please thinkabout this in the context of every 10 hours you spent learning and indicate how many of those hours were practical (e.g., on-the-job training,

    simulations, etc.) and how many were theoretical (in the classroom).

    SOURCE: McKinsey survey, Aug-Sept 2012, Education to Employment: Making the system work, McKinsey & Company, 2012

    Most effective instructional techniques1% of respondents saying technique is effective

    Use of hands-on learning in academic andvocational institutions2% of respondents indicating a majority ofhours spent in learning methodology

    2437

    76

    63

    VocationalCollegegrad or somecollege

    Hands onTheoretical

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    13/16

    As a result, only half of youth believe that their post-secondary studiesimproved their employment opportunities

    1 My post-high-school education improved my chances of getting a job.

    SOURCE: McKinsey survey, Aug-Sept 2012, Education to Employment: Making the system work, McKinsey & Company, 2012

    Students who believe their postsecondary studies improved their employment opportunities1

    % of respondents % of respondents

    54

    53

    46

    44

    40

    44

    51

    59

    60

    50

    UnitedKingdom

    UnitedStates

    Morocco

    Turkey

    Mexico

    Germany

    India

    Brazil

    SaudiArabia

    47

    51

    54

    56

    50

    Public openaccess

    Publicselective

    Privatefor profit

    Private notfor profit

    48

    44

    55

    50

    Vocational

    Somecollege/AA

    Collegegrad

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    14/16

    Per capita GDP000 2005 $ PPP

    Singapore

    Norway

    USA

    Ireland

    Denmark

    FranceFinland

    Japan

    UAE

    Spain

    Portugal

    Saudi Arabia

    Argentina

    Croatia

    Chile

    MalaysiaMexico

    Turkey

    Romania

    Iran

    Botswana

    South Africa

    Peru

    Algeria

    Thailand

    Morocco

    S Korea

    Colombia

    China

    Ukraine

    Egypt

    Jordan

    IndonesiaPhilippines

    Pakistan

    Sri Lanka

    Bangladesh

    Vietnam

    Cte dIvoire

    Ghana

    Nicaragua

    Nigeria

    Ethiopia

    Uganda

    India

    13SOURCE: United Nations population division; ILO; Global Insight; local statistics for China and India; MGI analyses

    1 Per cap GDP < 10K 2 10 K < Per cap GDP < 20K 3 Per cap GDP < 20KNote: Values for both per capita GDP and female participation plotted on log scales

    Womens workforce participation would potentially rise if the

    education-to-employment continuum worked well

    Developed 3

    Developing high income 2

    Developing low income 1

    50531

    Prime Female Labor Force Participation Rate, 201025-54 year old female labour-force as % of 25-54 year old female population

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    25

    2 4 7 10 2015 30 40

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    15/16

    14

    Two parts to a critical labor agenda for policy-makers (1/2)

    Raise secondary school capacity and attainment in developing

    countries by leveraging private investment for school construction andradical new models for teacher hiring and training (e.g., Korea)

    Align education with employment demand e.g. more STEMdegrees, certification programs in high-demand occupations such as

    health-care

    A global education revolution

    Make intersections happen along the education-to-employmentcontinuum Employers to design curricula and offer faculty, educationproviders to ensure students spend more time on job sites and securehiring guarantees; employers to commit to hiring youth before they areenrolled in programs to build skills.

    Adopt a new technology of education to increase productivity,reach and quality through online, open access and free educationmodels (e.g., Harvard/MITs edX)

    1

  • 7/30/2019 Anu Madgavkar - The World at Work

    16/16

    15

    Two parts to a critical labor agenda for policy-makers (2/2)

    Marketize informal sector jobs (e.g., home production and elder care)

    to bring these jobs into the formal labor market (e.g., Swedens tax deductionfor household services, Germanys mini-jobs)

    Create more jobs for low-and medium-skill workers

    Increase employment in labor-intensive manufacturing in developingeconomies by moving from raw materials to finished goods, and reformingthe business environment to improve export competitiveness (e.g.,Bangladesh)

    Encourage frugal innovation that stimulates demand and penetration inrural, low-income markets, creating sales and service jobs(e.g., telecom in India and Africa)

    Lower barriers to growth and job creation e.g., time and cost of startingbusiness, restrictions on kind of work that can be performed by less-skilledworkers

    Reduce barriers to housing and infrastructure projects to directly create

    low-skill construction jobs, as well as jobs in feeder industries such ascement

    2


Recommended