+ All Categories
Home > Documents > “inbreeding” (fixation index, F - Boston...

“inbreeding” (fixation index, F - Boston...

Date post: 15-Mar-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
6
1/28/13 1 Chapter 2 – Genotype Frequencies Mendelian Genetics Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Heterozygosity & Inbreeding Linkage and Recombination “inbreeding” (fixation index, F) consanguinity or kinship between individuals autozygosity of alleles within an individual or sampled at random from a population fixation index, measured as excess homozygosity in relation to HW expectations description of a population’s mating system increase in homozygosity due to: finite population size (genetic drift) population structure (drift within subpopulations) inbreeding depression (?)
Transcript
Page 1: “inbreeding” (fixation index, F - Boston Universitypeople.bu.edu/msoren/BI5152013/PGLecture4.pdf · “inbreeding” (fixation index, F) ! consanguinity or kinship between individuals

1/28/13  

1  

Chapter 2 – Genotype Frequencies

Mendelian Genetics

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

Heterozygosity & Inbreeding

Linkage and Recombination

“inbreeding” (fixation index, F)

v consanguinity or kinship between individuals v autozygosity of alleles within an individual or

sampled at random from a population v  fixation index, measured as excess

homozygosity in relation to HW expectations v description of a population’s mating system v  increase in homozygosity due to:

²  finite population size (genetic drift) ²  population structure (drift within subpopulations)

v  inbreeding depression (?)

Page 2: “inbreeding” (fixation index, F - Boston Universitypeople.bu.edu/msoren/BI5152013/PGLecture4.pdf · “inbreeding” (fixation index, F) ! consanguinity or kinship between individuals

1/28/13  

2  

fixation index and heterozygosity

v F = fixation index, measure of “excess” homozygosity (i.e., in comparison to HW expectations)

v F = (He – H0)/He, where H is heterozygosity

v assortative mating ² positive or negative (disassortative) ² consanguineous mating (inbreeding) ² selfing (sexual autogamy)

Penn & Potts. 1998. MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proc. Roy. Soc. 265: 1299-1306.

v How do mice acquire their mate choice preferences?

v Where does the recognition “template” come from? ²  self (the “armpit effect”), or ²  siblings during development

Page 3: “inbreeding” (fixation index, F - Boston Universitypeople.bu.edu/msoren/BI5152013/PGLecture4.pdf · “inbreeding” (fixation index, F) ! consanguinity or kinship between individuals

1/28/13  

3  

Penn & Potts. 1998. MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proc. Roy. Soc. 265: 1299-1306.

Multiple Alleles

v where k is the number of alleles

He =1! pi2

i=1

k

" = 2pi pjj=i+1

k

"i=1

k

"

Page 4: “inbreeding” (fixation index, F - Boston Universitypeople.bu.edu/msoren/BI5152013/PGLecture4.pdf · “inbreeding” (fixation index, F) ! consanguinity or kinship between individuals

1/28/13  

4  

Selfing

v what’s wrong here?

+ H/4 4

8 8

4 4 8 8

Relatedness and Autozygosity

v Autozygous = “identical by descent” (IBD) v Relatedness = the fraction of alleles that two

individuals share IBD

v  Inbreeding coefficient = f = probability that the two alleles at a given locus within an individual are IBD

v Relatedness between two individuals (that are not already inbred) is double the inbreeding coefficient in their potential offspring

Page 5: “inbreeding” (fixation index, F - Boston Universitypeople.bu.edu/msoren/BI5152013/PGLecture4.pdf · “inbreeding” (fixation index, F) ! consanguinity or kinship between individuals

1/28/13  

5  

Relatedness and Autozygosity

Calulating f

v what’s wrong here?

v pg. 37: relatedness = 2 x autozygosity

Page 6: “inbreeding” (fixation index, F - Boston Universitypeople.bu.edu/msoren/BI5152013/PGLecture4.pdf · “inbreeding” (fixation index, F) ! consanguinity or kinship between individuals

1/28/13  

6  

Calulating f

v example with multiple common ancestors

Inbreeding Depression

v Dominance hypothesis ² deleterious recessives ² fitness of aa lower than AA or Aa ² predicts gradual elimination of a from

population

v Overdominance hypothesis ² heterosis or heterozygote advantage ² fitness of Aa higher than AA or aa ² predicts ongoing maintenance of both A

and a


Recommended