Date post: | 25-Dec-2014 |
Category: |
Health & Medicine |
Upload: | praveen-neema |
View: | 3,950 times |
Download: | 1 times |
TEE Quantification of Aortic Stenosis and
Aortic RegurgitationDr PK Neema
Normal Aortic valve
ME Sax view transducer at 40o
Normal flow-dynamics
V1 = V2
P1 = P2V1
V2
P2
P1
Aortic velocity Vmax 1-1.2m/sec
LVOT max velocity 0.9-1.1 m/sec
AS and its effect on Flow-dynamic
P1 > P2
V2 > V1
Doppler principle
Effect of interrogation angle on frequency shift
Ultrasound beam should be parallel to the flow under study
The ultrasound should intercept the center of the flow not the periphery
The interrogation angle should be < 15o
The view optimal for the imaging may not be the optimal view for the Doppler study
Essentials during Doppler study
Transgastric Lax view (Transducer at 130o)
TEE Views for Doppler study
Deep Transgastric Lax view
TEE Views for Doppler study
Simplified Bernoulli equation Continuity equation
Methods to quantify AS
Simplified Bernoulli equation
P = 4V2 2
Severe AS = P > 75 mmHg
P – Pressure gradient
Deep Transgastric Lx View
Peak velocity Mean velocity Peak gradient 4V2
Mean gradient Velocity time
integral (VTI) or TVI
Measurements
Continuity equation
Continuity equation
Blood flow through LVOT = Blood flow through AoV
Blood flow through LVOT = CSA LVOT X TVI LVOT
Blood flow through AoV = CSA AoV X TVI AoV
CSA LVOT X TVI LVOT = CSA AoV X TVI AoV
CSA AoV = LVOT flow/TVI AoV
The LVOT diameter is measured in ME Lax view at 130o and measured from endocardium to endocardium at the level of insertion of AV leaflets in midsystole
Inaccuracy in the measurement of diameter can result in gross error since the radius of the LVOT is squared for calculating area (CSA = πr2)
Assessment of LVOT area
ME Lax View Xducer at 130o
The TVI is measured by Doppler interrogation through LVOT using pulse wave Doppler (PWD)
The sample volume is assessed just proximal to the aortic valve within the LVOT where the annular dimension is measured
TVI Measurement in LVOT
Transgastric Lax view
NORMAL MILD MODERATE
SEVERE
Peak velocity (m/s)
1.0-1.2 <3 3-4.5 >4.5
Peak gradient (mmHg)
16-36 36-75 >75
Mean gradient (mmHg)
<20 20-40 >40
AVA (cm2) 3-5 1-1.5 0.8-1 <0.8
Severity of AS
AS and ◦ Mitral regurgitation◦ Low cardiac output ◦ Aortic regurgitation
Fallacies
The MR jet can be mistaken for that of AS. How to avoid the MR jet?
◦ The MR jet should be visualized during colour Doppler imaging and the MR jet path should be consciously avoided.
How to confirm?◦ The MR jet starts early with LV contraction, the AS jet
starts later in systole. ◦ The MR jet starts in the early portion of QRS complex
while AS jet starts in the mid or late portion of QRS complex. Determination is facilitated by recording the jets at a faster sweep speed (100 mm/s)
AS and Mitral regurgitation (MR)
Gorlin formula (AVA = Cardiac output/ 44.3 (SEP) (HR) √mean gradient
The CO is an important determinant of valve area and a decrease in CO result in a decrease in the peak aortic gradient and the severity of AS Accordingly, one should assess LV function before ‘small gradients’ are reported as insignificant.
Dobutamine stress test and dimensionless index are evaluated to assess AS severity in presence of low CO.
AS and Low cardiac output
High CO, similar to low CO, result in over estimation of peak gradient and AS severity.
The discrepancy is corrected by measuring the blood flow velocity in the LVOT and applying a correction if the measured LVOT peak velocity exceeds 1.5 m/s.
Peak gradient in presence of significant aortic regurgitation =
4 [(peak velocity)2 – (LVOT velocity)2]
AS and Aortic regurgitation
Dobutamine (5-10 μg/kg/min) is infused to increase CO
An increase in pressure gradient suggests severe valvular disease.
No or borderline increase in pressure gradient suggest primary myocardial disease as the cause of low gradient and contraindicate valve replacement as the primary therapy;
However, AS is a unique cardiovascular disease where patients with a low EF may normalize after valve replacement.
Dobutamine stress test
LVOT and aortic TVI ratio or peak LVOT and aortic velocity ratio of 0.25 or less indicates critical AS.
Useful in evaluation of patients with prosthetic aortic valves where measurement of aortic annular dimensions is not clear.
Dimensionless index
Aortic Regurgitation
ME Lax view Transducer at 130o
Based on◦ Color flow Doppler (Jet width and jet area
measurement)◦ Continuity equation◦ Regurgitant jet velocity assessment
AR quantification
TEE view for jet width measurement
ME Lax view Transducer at 130o
Jet width to LVOT diameter ratio
Jet width-LVOT diameter ratio > 65% indicate severe AR
Color M mode
75/214=0.35
LVOT Shadowing◦ Aortic prosthesis◦ Mitral prosthesis◦ Site and shape of the orifice (Eccentric jet,
multiple jet)
Jet width limitations
TEE views for jet area measurement
ME Sax view Transducer at 40o
1+ < 4% (trivial)2+ 4-24 (mild) 3+ 25-59 (moderate) 4+ >60 (severe)
Jet area/LVOT area
Vena Contracta
Vena Contracta width of> 6 mm indicate Severe AR
Blood flow through LVOT = CSA LVOT X TVI LVOT
Blood flow through RVOT = CSA RVOT X TVI RVOT
Regurgitant volume = CSA LVOT X TVI LVOT – CSA RVOT X TVI
RVOT
EROA = Regurgitant volume/VTI(VTI measured by PWD)
Continuity equation
Deceleration Slope and Pressure-half time
The velocity of regurgitant jet during diastole is directly related to pressure gradient between aortic root and LV.
A large regurgitant defect will rapidly decrease pressures gradient and the velocity of regurgitant jet, hence slope of AR jet indicate severity of AR CWD analysis of AR jet transgastric
or deep transgastric view
Regurgitant jet Slope Decay
Ao
LV pressure
CWD LVOT
Mild AR Severe AR (>3m/sec2)
Ao
LV
LVEDP – Ischemia, LV dysfunction Low Aortic diastolic pressure Eccentric jets Acute AR vs. C/c AR
CWD-Deceleration slope limitations
Holo-diastolic flow reversal
Severe AR
Severity of Regurgitation
<3 mm 3-6 mm