+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Aperture for AFP, ALICE, and LHCb (LHC)

Aperture for AFP, ALICE, and LHCb (LHC)

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Author: price-noble
View: 15 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Aperture for AFP, ALICE, and LHCb (LHC). M. Giovannozzi Acknowledgements: H. Burkhardt , B. Holzer , D. Macina , M. A. Gallilee , J. Jowett, G. Spigo. Disclaimer: unless otherwise stated, nominal parameters are used. AFP layout - I. AFP layout - II. Layout provided by G. Spigo . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Embed Size (px)
Popular Tags:
of 15 /15
Aperture for AFP, ALICE, and LHCb (LHC) M. Giovannozzi Acknowledgements: H. Burkhardt, B. Holzer, D. Macina, M. A. Gallilee, J. Jowett, G. Spigo 15/06/2012 MG - LEB meeting 1 Disclaimer: unless otherwise stated, nominal parameters are used.
Transcript

New layout files for ATLAS and CMS experimental beam pipes

Aperture for AFP, ALICE, and LHCb (LHC)M. Giovannozzi Acknowledgements: H. Burkhardt, B. Holzer, D. Macina, M. A. Gallilee, J. Jowett, G. Spigo15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting1Disclaimer: unless otherwise stated, nominal parameters are used.AFP layout - I15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting2

AFP layout - IILayout provided by G. Spigo.Defined maximum aperture markers for MAD-X model:Mechanical tolerances equal to those of neighbouring magnetic elements, i.e., 0.84 mm radial, 0.36 mm horizontal.Aperture definition: maximum rectangle inscribed into real aperture shape.Defined installation of markers for Beam 1 and Beam 2 elements.Defined offset files.No change in position between injection and top energy.All files (and sample job) available under afs at ~giovanno/public/For_AFP15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting3

AFP aperture: results - I15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting4

b*=11 mq=170 mradSep=2 mmAFP aperture: results - II15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting5

b*=0.55 mq=142.5 mradSep=0.5 mmAlice beam pipe - INew layout before LS2: certified (by M. A. Gallilee) nominal layout.New layout after LS2: certified (by M. A. Gallilee) proposed layout.S-dependent tolerances have been introduced for both layouts.Several configurations considered:Nominal injectionNominal collision proton physicsNominal squeezed - ion physics15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting6Alice beam pipe - II15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting7

8MG - LEB meeting15/06/2012Alice aperture: results - I

b*=10 mqext=170 mradSep=2 mmR = 17.2 mm, tol. = 5.1 mm -> n1 = 4.1 sR = 19.2 mm, tol. = 5.1 mm -> n1 = 8.4 sAlice aperture: results - II15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting9

b*=10 mqtotal=88 mradSep=0.5 mmb*=0.6 mqtotal=150 mradSep=0.7 mmLHCb beam pipe - INew layout before LS2: certified (by M. A. Gallilee) nominal layout.New layout after LS2: certified (by M. A. Gallilee) proposed layout.S-dependent tolerances have been introduced for both layouts.Several configurations considered:Nominal injectionNominal collision proton physicsNominal squeezed proton physics15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting10LHCb beam pipe - II15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting11

12MG - LEB meeting15/06/2012LHCb aperture: results - I

b*=10 mqext=170 mradSep=2 mmLHCb aperture: results - II15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting13

b*=10 mqtotal=370 mradSep=2 mmb*=3 mqtotal=265 mradSep=0.7 mmConclusions for nominal LHC - IAFPCurrent proposal is compatible with aperture requirements. It is also compatible with high-beat optics. Further aperture restrictions (installation of Ferrites) should be re-evaluated.Compatibility between AFP and ALFA should be carefully assessed.The AFP area will be completely changed in the HL-LHC era.AliceToo small aperture at injection beyond -2 m from IP!High-beta optics not considered: it will enhance the aperture problems.Top energy configurations are fine.LHCbNo specific problems found.V-crossing at top energy with b*=3 m considered: no problem foundAll the files for Alice and LHCb are available under/afs/cern.ch/eng/lhc/optics/V6.503/aperture: nominal beam pipe/afs/cern.ch/eng/lhc/optics/V6.503/aperture/as-built: upgraded beam pipeAny feedback is more then welcome!15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting14Conclusions for nominal LHC - IIAn important remark: the running conditions after LS2 are not completely defined (or at least known to me). An exhaustive analysis is therefore not possible, to date.15/06/2012MG - LEB meeting15


Recommended