Appendix 3 Corporate Governance Priorities (Q2 Position)

8/3/2019 Appendix 3 Corporate Governance Priorities (Q2 Position)

1/20

Report of the Commissioners forthe Isle of Anglesey County Council

to the Minister for Local

Government and Communities

Appendix 3


2/20

Strategic Priority: (What)Commissioners Corporate Governance Priorities

Development Priority (We will): Standards of Conduct and behaviour of Members and Officers

Key actions (by...)

Responsible

Offic

er

By

when

Success Criteria / Measure (How do

we know when you have achieved the

key action?) Performance Indicator / an

Action you will undertake / or both

Qtr

1

Qtr

2

Qtr

3

Qtr

4

Risks & Risk Mitigation Commentary RiskRAG

andTrend

Compliance with Protocol forSelf Regulation adopted bythe County Council 4.3.10

LB April

2011March2012

100% of Panels established byStandards Committee under Protocol forSelf Regulation following request byGroup Leader

Risk1. Escalation of disputes2. Misconduct in meetings3. Misuse of media4. Tit for tat complaints to PSOWMitigation1. Extraordinary meetings to expedite2. Member on Member complaints procedureto be published by PSOW May 2012

Quarterly reports to StandardsCommittee

LB April

2011March2012

Reduction in number of conductcomplaints received by Ombudsman incomparison with same quarter 2010/11.

RiskReputational damageMitigation1. Ongoing training and development2. Protocols for Resolution3. Group Leaders Meetings with ChiefExecutive

Signed job descriptions andperson specificationsreceived by Monitoring Officer

LB April

2011March2012

100% of up to date job descriptions andperson specifications valid in eachquarter

RiskResistance to change and professionalisationof Members.Mitigation1. Intervention by Group Leaders/Chair2. Member Development Working Group

Completed enhanced CRBforms received by HR

LB Apr

2011March2012

100% of Members submitted full datarequired for enhanced CRB checks

RiskSome resistance to change andprofessionalisation of Members.Mitigation1. Intervention by Group Leaders/Chair2. Member Development Working Group


3/20


Development Priority (We will): Standards of Conduct and behaviour of Members and Officers

Key actions (by...)

Respon

sible

Officer

Bywhen





Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4

Risks & Risk Mitigation Commentary RiskRAGand

Trend

PDR interviews taken placeand pro formas received byHR

LB April

2011March2012

20 PDRs completed, in accordance withpilot, by December 2011

Risk1. Resistance to change andprofessionalisation of Members2. Criticism by RegulatorsMitigation1. Templates circulated2. Briefing sessions arranged3. Officer support

Review and agreement onMember / Officer Relations

Protocol

LB April

2011

March2012

Review to be undertaken 14th

December2011 revised Protocol to be adopted by

full Council no later than May 2012

RiskMissed opportunity to reinforce key recovery

issue before May 2012Mitigation1. Local resolution re Members/Officers2. Training


Development Priority (We will): Develop effective partnerships between Council and the public and private sectors at a local, regional andnational level

Key actions (by...)

Responsible

Officer

Bywhen

Success Criteria / Measure

(How do we know when you have

achieved the key action?)

Performance Indicator / an Actionyou will undertake / or both

Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4

Risks & Risk Mitigation Commentary RiskRAGandTrend


4/20


Development Priority (We will): Develop effective partnerships between Council and the public and private sectors at a local, regional and

national level

Key actions (by...)

Responsible

Offic

er

By

when

Success Criteria / Measure (How do we know when you have



Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


andTrend

Implementation of the Children &Young Peoples Partnership Plan

IR April2011 /March2012

Success against the 7 core aims ofthe Partnerships Plan

TBC

Risk Performance Monitoring capacity issues

Mitigation OngoingPartnership Board discussion to mitigatecapacity issues

TBC

Implementation of the ChildrensServices Improvement Plan as aresult of the CCSIW review

AH Aug

2011 /March

2012

Success against the 4 themesidentified within the Plan

Risk Service User operational risk +Reputational

Mitigationestablishment of ChildrensServices Improvement Board (inclusive ofIndependent External Support Team) tooversee progress.

Implementation of the HealthSocial Care and WellbeingStrategy

GL Apr

2011 /March2012

Progress achieved against the 3priority areas identified in theStrategy

Promoting Healthy LifestylesChronic Conditions ManagementPromoting independence(vulnerable service user groups)

Risk loss of resource highlights capacityrisks to drive strategy forward

Mitigation Capacity identification with partnerorganisations

Implementation of communitysafety service

TJ Apr2011 /March2012

Decrease in offences against localpriority areas and key monitoredareas

Risk Local risks identified and acknowledgedin JAG report

Mitigation Local action plans beingdeveloped and implemented by LocalNeighbourhood Policing Teams


5/20


Development Priority (We will): Develop effective partnerships between Council and the public and private sectors at a local, regional and

national level

Key actions (by...)

Resp

onsible

Offic

er

By

when

Success Criteria / Measure (How do we know when you have



Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


andTrend

Implementation of AngleseysDestination Management Plan(Tourism)

DW Sept

2011 /March2012

Success against the identifiedthemes outlined in the workprogramme

Risk non-appointment of tourism basedconsultant to assist the development of apartnership plan

Mitigation Tendering of service / interviewsand appointment to be undertaken during Q3

Successful implementation of theOutcome Agreement work areas

SL

G

April2011 /

March2012

100% grant allocated for 2011/12 Risk lack of quarterly targets identified whichimpacts of robustness of delivery performance

Mitigation quarterly target setting beingdeveloped amongst stakeholders

Energy Island programme SWD

April2011 /March2012

Risk - No data submitted to date

Mitigation reporting structure formalised andadopted for Q3

Review 4 collaborationprogramme areas

AWO/

TGJ/R

PJ

April2011March2012

Delivery of programme as perproject plan

Risk issues identified in certain collaborativeareas

Mitigation Escalation of local issues to NorthWales CEO programme board

Review of Local Services Boardand other key Partnerships

HJ April

2011April2012

Streamlined operational modeldeveloped for key partnerships andagreed on a sub-regional level

Risk Collective agreement on proposed sub-regional model

Mitigation Structured engagement processwith stakeholders in development of revisedmodel


6/20


Development Priority (We will): Develop strategic priorities with more outcome focused measurement

Key actions (by...)

Respon

sible

Officer

Bywhen





Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


Trend

Engagement with stakeholders toidentify outcome based prioritiesto shape 2012/15 Corporate Plan

GM July

2011March2012

Engagement successfully completed withfollowing stakeholdersCitizensCommunitiesBusiness partnersChildren & Young PeopleHealth and Well-being PartnershipCitizens Advice Bureau3

rdSector

Risk lack of engagement due to apathy /bad weather

Mitigation various ways of engagementproposed inclusive of a planned PRcampaign to generate and enthusepeoples views.

Outcome based Corporate Business Plan

2012/15 with clearly identifiedperformance indicators and measures

Risk lack of buy in amongst Senior

Management Team

Mitigation comprehensive engagementprocess to secure buy-in and ownership.

Engage with stakeholders toidentify outcome based prioritiesto shape 2012/15 CommunityStrategy

CWO

Sept2011Dec2011

Engagement successfully completed withfollowing stakeholdersCitizensCommunitiesBusiness partnersChildren & Young PeopleHealth and Well-being PartnershipCitizens Advice Bureau

3rd Sector

Risk partnership rationalisation withGwynedd leading to structural uncertainty.

Mitigation T&F group to be appointedduring Q3 to identify and establish a localwork programme.

Preparation of Single IntegratedStrategic Plan

HJ/CWO

Jan2012March2013

Single integrated strategic plan for Isle ofAnglesey

Risk delay in receipt of WelshGovernment guidelines

Mitigation review of other LA areaswhere process has been completed


7/20

Strategic Priority: (What) Commissioners Corporate Governance Priorities

Development Priority (We will): Effectiveness of Scrutiny

Key actions (by...)

Respon

sible

Officer

Bywhen

Success Criteria / Measure (How

do we know when you have achieved

the key action?) Performance

Indicator / an Action you willundertake / or both

Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


Trend

Scrutiny making an impact onService Delivery

BS April

2011March2012

90% of Scrutiny recommendations/reports approved by the *decision-makers.(*DM = Dir,HoS,PH &/or full

Executive)

Risk - % figures rather than actual nos couldskew results.

Mitigation - corporately agreed template toforward Scrutinys recommendations to theExecutive in an efficient, timely manner.

Reduction in number of Call-insdue to increased activity of thepre-scrutiny function

BS April

2011March

2012

0% of call-ins initiated(Pre scrutiny better measured bymore Scrutiny pre-policy

development work, Scrutinymonitoring prior performance databefore the Exc)

Risk - not holding the Executive/C toaccount.

Risk - lack of alignment of Committees withExecutive meetings

Mitigation - Investigatory Scrutiny can act asa critical friend (best practice recommendssmaller groups of Scrutiny Members for this)

Mitigation Planning of pre-scrutiny functionin accordance with Corporate calendar.

Reflecting the Public voice reconcerns for Scrutiny bymonitoring the number of citizens

or reps from community groupswho participate in the Scrutinyprocess e.g. attending meetings /responding to questionnairesa.s.o

BS April

2011March

2012

Baseline to be identified Risk - No baseline confirmed as 1st

year forcollection of this PI data.

Mitigation quarterly performance targets tobe collected and aggregated to demonstrate1

styear results


8/20


Development Priority (We will): Effectiveness of ScrutinyKey actions (by...)

Respon

sible

Officer

Bywhen

Success Criteria / Measure (Howdo we know when you have achievedthe key action?) Performance


Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


Trend

Ensuring that Scrutinyaccomplishes its function of beinga critical friend of the Executive.

BS April

2011March2012

No. of items from Improvement Planreferred to Scrutiny committees 5min p.a.

Risk Pre-scrutiny function identified in 3above reflects away from need to act as acritical friend.

Mitigation - Greater number of investigatoryscrutiny from Improvement Plan


Development Priority (We will): The organisation, coherence and effectiveness of the Councils senior management teamKey actions (by...)

Responsible

Officer

Bywhen

Success Criteria / Measure (How dowe know when you have achieved thekey action?) Performance Indicator / anAction you will undertake / or both

Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4

Risks & Risk MitigationCommentary

RiskRAGandTrend

Review role, purpose andfunction of SLG / MT

SLG

Sept2011

March2012

Structure, purpose and role clearlydefined and communicated

Risk Uncertainty re: role of SLGresulting in non fulfilment of

corporate objectives such as thefulfilment of the APP programme.

Mitigation Structured process ofidentifying structure, role andpurpose being led by the ChiefExecutive.


9/20


Development Priority (We will): The organisation, coherence and effectiveness of the Councils senior management teamKey actions (by...)

Responsible

Officer

Bywhen

Success Criteria / Measure (How dowe know when you have achieved thekey action?) Performance Indicator / an


Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4

Risks & Risk MitigationCommentary

RiskRAGand

Trend

Identification of InternalCorporate GovernanceImprovement Objectives for2012/13

SLG

Nov2011Dec2012

Inward looking Corporate priorities whichcompliment the outcome focusedpriorities being developed

Measureable targets identified to succeed

Risk - Insufficient information /intelligence gathered to supportdecision making process.

Mitigation Consideration ofExternal reviews and sub-standardperformance data.

Propose allocation of resourcesto priorities in budget setting

SLG

Oct2011

March2012

Executive / Full Council agreement with2012 /13 budget proposal aligned with

and integrated with Corporate BusinessPlan 2012/15

Risk - Insufficient information /intelligence provided as result of

engagement process.

Mitigation - Engagement processpriorities + external review priorities+ demographic intelligence +external budgetary guidance + WGpriorities used to allocate resource


Development Priority (We will): The effectiveness of the Councils Standards CommitteeKey actions (by...)

Responsible

Officer

Bywhen

Success Criteria / Measure (Howdo we know when you have achievedthe key action?) PerformanceIndicator / an Action you willundertake / or both

Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4



10/20



Responsible

Officer

Bywhen



Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


Trend

To conduct a preliminary hearingwithin 6 weeks following referralfrom the PSOW or followingdecision of Indemnities SubCommittee

LB April

2011March2012

100% preliminary hearings withintimescale

Risk - Lack of timely response to PSOWreports will cause reputational damage andgovernance issuesMitigation - 1. Adopted procedure for SubCommittee2. To adopt new procedure for hearings

To conduct hearings intoapplications for dispensationswithin one month of receipt

LB April

2011March2012

100 % of applications decided withintimescale

Risks - Members/public wronglydisenfranchisedMitigation -1. Preliminary advice and draftingby Monitoring Officer

2. Extraordinary meetings3. Panels established

To review the two Registers ofMembers Interests followed byadvice and guidance, ifappropriate

LB April

2011March2012

Reviews of each to be undertakenannually

Risk - 1. Lack of assurance role for public2. Complacency by Members3. Significant burden to Standards CommitteeMitigation - 1. Publish results2. Issue advisories3. Divide the work among co-opted Members

To supervise the Register of Giftsand Hospitality followed by adviceand guidance, if appropriate

LB April

2011March2012

Reviews to be undertaken annually Risk - 1. Lack of assurance role for public2. Complacency by Members3. Significant burden to Standards CommitteeMitigation - 1. Publish results2. Issue advisories

3. Divide the work among co-opted MembersTo review the Councils Protocolfor Member / Officer Relations

LB April

2011March2012

New Protocol to be recommended tofull Council/Welsh Government byend Q4.

Risk - Missed opportunity to reinforce keyrecovery issue before May 2012

Mitigation - 1. Local resolution reMembers/Officers2. Training


11/20



Responsible

Officer

Bywhen



Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


Trend

Establish meetings of theStandards Committee to reviewpolicies relevant to its remit

LB April

2011March2012

100% of policies reviewed withintimetable agreed with relevant Headof Service/requesting officer

Risk - 1. Loss of independent view2. Role to protect interests of minorityopposition group/s

Mitigation - 1. Extraordinary meetings2. Specialists present to advise

To review Members TrainingPlan and, attendance at trainingetc

LB April

2011March2012

Review completed and StandardsCommittee issues advisories to100% of any Members notdemonstrating adequate commitment

to development

Risk - Stagnation/development opportunitieslost

Mitigation

1. Personal Development Reviews2. Alternative methods to training3. Private face to face meetings of Panel ofStandards Committee to resolve any issues.


Development Priority (We will): Fully engage with and reflect the views and priorities of the citizens of Anglesey Key actions (by...)

Re

sponsible

Officer

By when

Success Criteria / Measure (How do weknow when you have achieved the keyaction?) Performance Indicator / an Actionyou will undertake / or both

Qt

r1

Qt

r2

Qt

r3

Qt

r4


1. Develop and implementthe Democratic RenewalStrategy

Done

By Apr 12

i) An adopted Strategy and Year 1 ActionPlan

ii) Delivery of the Year 1 Action Plan with aRisk - changes to election timetableMitigation - preparation to continue activity


12/20



Responsible

Officer

By when


Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


By Apr 12

focus on raising the profile of local electionsin 2012 to:- increase voter turnout- increase diversity within candidates- increase diversity within elected

members

iii) An agreed Year 2 Action Plan

to final election date if necessary

Risk low level of support from politicalparties to support potential newcandidatesMitigation parties have entered into acommitment to prioritise this

2. Develop and implement

the Community EngagementStrategy

Done

By Apr 12

Done

Done

By endFeb 12

By Mar 12

By Apr 12

i) An adopted Strategy and Year 1 Action

Plan

ii) Delivery of the Year 1 Action Plan,including:- area-based engagement structuresinitiated

- attendance and views gained atAnglesey-wide road-shows(Quantitative + Qualitative)

- conduct a Residents Survey to gainviews and opinions about IoACCservices

- strengthened relationship with Town and

Community Councils throughdevelopment of Charter Agreement

iii) An agreed Year 2 Action Plan to drive astep change in community engagementacross all IoACC portfolio areas andcommunities

Riskwe dont achieve good levelinterest and buy-in from public toascertain their viewsMitigation high quality, targetedcommunications and continue to refinethe area approach in response to learningabout what works

RiskT&C Councils dont buy-in toCharter developmentMitigation good communication

Risk lack of dedicated resources todeliver due to budgetary constraintsMitigation- dedicated budget, plus workingwith Gwynedd CC to explore jointworking and sharing resources e.g. joint


13/20



Responsible

Officer

By when


Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


consultations

3. Develop and implementthe Communication Strategy

Done

By Apr 12

By Apr 12

i) An adopted Strategy and Year 1 ActionPlan

ii) Delivery of Year 1 Action Plan, including:- use of different media channels toinform and engage citizens

- increasing Website traffic towww.anglesey.gov.uk

iii) An agreed Year 2 Action Plan to drive astep change in communication activitiesacross all IoACC portfolio areas andcommunities.

Risk activities rely on ICTMitigation good communication with ICTStrategy delivery team

Riskresources to deliverMitigation we have a strengthened teambut available budget is too tight

4. Develop and publish theStrategic Equality Plan

02 Apr 12 An adopted and published Plan. Risk fall to meet the necessarypublication dateMitigation regular review and projectmanagement

5. Review the implicationsfor IoACC of the Local

Government (Wales)Measure 2011, and agree anAction Plan to implement.(taking into account thespecific actions underDevelopment PriorityEffectiveness of Scrutiny)

End Dec11

By Apr 12

i) A review and recommendations paper

ii) An agreed Year 1 Action Plan
http://www.anglesey.gov.uk/http://www.anglesey.gov.uk/http://www.anglesey.gov.uk/


14/20



Responsible

Officer

By when


Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


6. Six-monthly review withHR to consider anyMember/Staff Developmentrequired as result ofactivities 1-5 above.

Fromend Dec11

A six-monthly review Risk development needs are identifiedbut resources not available, or lack oftake-up from candidates.Mitigation dedicated resources, goodcommunication around benefits ofdevelopment

Strategic Priority: (What) Commissioners Corporate Governance Priorities - Organisation, coherence and effectiveness

Development Priority (We will): Improve the capacity, quality and management of corporate support servicesKey actions (by...)

Responsible

Officer

Bywhen


Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


Produce action plan to driveprioritized improvement ofFinance function

GL Oct

2011March2012

Regular financial reporting to fit as part ofthe performance management framework

Risk Capacity to deliver

Mitigation Building capacity in finance

GL Oct

2011March2012

Build capacity of finance function Risk Difficulties in recruiting

Mitigation Retain good quality staffcurrently in post and use flexible methodsto build.


15/20



Responsible

Officer

Bywhen


Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


GL Oct

2011March2012

Implement new financial systems Risk Current support provision willexpire 2013

Mitigation Proceed to new system

GL Oct

2011March2012

Implement new fixed asset accountingsystem

Risk Lose expertise

Mitigation Increase capacitry short termto develop system

GL Oct

2011March2012

Assist in challenging VFM improvementsthroughout the organisation (reflected inSDPs)

Risk Authority does not deliver VFMservice

Mitigation More work to be undertakenwith Service accountants

GL Oct

2011March2012

Agree appropriateness & timeliness offinancial information given to ServiceManagers

Risk Capacity of finance function

Mitigation Build on already goodrelationships to develop servicearrangements

GLJuly

2011March2012

Embed risk management into decision

making practices to improve deliverability

Risk not used corporately or for decision

making

Mitigation SLG ownership

GL Oct

2011March2012

Review FPRs to ensure fit for purpose todeliver modern performancemanagement framework

Risk Capacity of finance

Mitigation Additional resources shortterm to deliver


16/20



Responsible

Officer

Bywhen


Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


GL Oct

2011March2012

Closure of accounts in line with statutoryobligations

Risk Capacity and no plan / timetablefor achieving action

Mitigation see below

G

LOct

2011March2012

Review process for closing accounts and

implement robust sustainable solution

Risk Expertise not built in

Mitigation Plan to build sustainablesolution using Interim and Peer support

Prioritise recommendations ofICT Peer Review and produceaction plan to drive prioritizedimprovements smartly

GL Oct

2011March2012

Revise ICT strategy to align itself with thedirection and values of the organisation(mindful of the shared services agenda)

The strategy is aligned with Corporatedirection and will be updated on a regularbasis.

GL Nov

2011March2012

Rebuild ICT budget from a zero baseidentifying all current spend andreplacement / upgrade plans and usingthis as a base for projecting a 3 year ICT

budget.

Risk Capacity

Mitigation Resource Planning.Discussions with Finance officers

ongoing. Financial commitment identified.

GL Dec

2011Jan2012

Review and revisit membership of the ICTStrategy Group.

Section 151 Officer to chair next meetingof ICTSG to establish way forward.


17/20



Responsible

Officer

Bywhen


Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


Implement essential elements ofthe HR strategic work programme

CE Aug

2011Dec2012

Buy in and production of an AngleseyCounty Council People Strategy whichwill outline the Councils plan to manageits staff into the future

Risk Capacity / Non Buy-in standardsNot supported at LJCC

Development and implementationa new Corporate PersonalDevelopment Review process

CE Aug

2011March2012

100% of staff throughout the organisationto have undertaken a PDR by Dec 2011

RiskCapacity & Buy in by managers

Mitigation Operational directive andintegration within PMF

Reduce sickness absence byworking collaboratively as anorganisation.

CE April

2011March2012

Robust baseline data established Risk - Northgate system not able todeliver stats (systems)

Mitigation Project Team identified tomitigate risks

Implementation of anorganisational managementreview

RPJ/CE

Sept2011March2012

Restructuring of Senior ManagementAppointment of new Chief ExecutiveSuccessful review of terms andconditions

Risk - Unsuccessful re-negotiation ofterms and conditions, impact on APPprofiled savings

Mitigation Process plan to successfullyreview


18/20


Development Priority (We will): Introduce a robust process for the performance, project and risk managementKey actions (by...)

Resp

onsible

Officer

By

when

Success Criteria / Measure (How dowe know when you have achieved the

key action?) Performance Indicator / anAction you will undertake / or both

Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


andTrend

Establishing, adopting andimplementing a CorporatePlanning and PerformanceManagement Framework toproduce and monitor theorganisations work into thefuture.

GM June

2011March2012

Adoption bySLGHeads of ServiceCorporate ScrutinyCommissioners

Risk Resource risk of accepting andimplementing a corporate changeagenda

Mitigation pre-planning & identificationof resource issues and prioritisation ofworkloads.

Draft Corporate Business Plan by

December 2011 inclusive of financial /budgetary position

Risk difficulty in providing clarity as to

fit of financial information as part of theoverarching framework. Financialtimescales slipped.

Mitigation on-going corporate dialogueto identify issues and highlight themearly in order to minimise associatedrisk.

Service Improvement Plans submittedand signed off by SLG - March 31

st, 2012

N/A

Risk non-submission of SDPs byService Heads

Mitigation PMF roll out + scheduled

identification of 3 month window to draft

Corporate Risk register in place andoperational by October 2011.

Risk understanding of significance androle to play in decision making process.

Mitigation Corporate Training initiativeto be rolled out to Senior Officers in Q3.


19/20


Development Priority (We will): Introduce a robust process for the performance, project and risk managementKey actions (by...)

Resp

onsible

Officer

By

when

Success Criteria / Measure (How dowe know when you have achieved the

key action?) Performance Indicator / anAction you will undertake / or both

Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


andTrend

Personal Development Reviewscompleted by December 31

st, 2011.

Risk logistical / resource / cultural

Mitigation planning / training andOperational directive

Successful management of the followingprogrammes

Job Evaluation

Affordable Priorities ProgrammeEnergy Island

Risks Financial implications of notachieving savings targets on 2012/13budget.

Risk - Financial implications of notachieving satisfactory outcome of JE.

Mitigation programme / projectmanagement identifying risks for SLGconsideration as early as possible.

Drafting and agreement of theAnnual Improvement Report

HJ Oct

31,2011

Full Council approvalWAO endorsement

Risk Governance & Reputational

Mitigation Engagement & Pre-planning


20/20


Development Priority (We will): Relationship between Members and Political GroupsKey actions (by...)

Respons

ible

Officer

Bywhen


Qtr1

Qtr2

Qtr3

Qtr4


Compliance with the PoliticalManagement Protocols asadopted and incorporated into theConstitution by full Council on the8

thMarch 2011

LB March

2011May2012

Zero reports from statutory officers to theCommissioners notifying breach ofProtocols

Risk1. Committees continuing to operatecontrary to Allocations Protocol.2. Political instability, especially whencurrent Intervention due to end.3. Criticism from Regulators/WelshGovernment

Mitigation1. Intervention by Commissioners

2. Negotiate a new deal as part ofconstitutional review

Date post:	06-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	druid-of-anglesey
View:	225 times
Download:	0 times

Appendix 3 Corporate Governance Priorities (Q2 Position)

Documents