+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports

Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports

Date post: 11-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: vuquynh
View: 215 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
22
Appendix B Bridge Material Testing Reports
Transcript
Page 1: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports

Appendix B

Bridge Material Testing Reports

Page 2: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 3: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports

Client: CH2M Hill CTLGroup Project No.: 150721

Project: Latah Bridge Rehabilitation Study CTLGroup Project Mgr.: Q. Li

Technician: P. Brindise

Report Date: November 8, 2011 Approved By: J. L. Jones

Specimen IdentificationClient Identification A1 A5CTLGroup Identification 2970403 2970404Date Core Obtained from the Field 10/4/2011 10/4/2011Date Core Placed in Sealed Bag after Saw Cutting 10/24/2011 10/24/2011Date Core was Tested 10/31/2011 10/31/2011

Concrete DescriptionNominal Maximum Aggregate Size, in. 1 1/2 1 1/2Concrete Age at Test ~ 100 yrs ~ 100 yrsMoisture Condition at Test Note 1 Note 1Orientation of Core Axis in Structure Note 3 Note 3

Concrete DimensionsLength of Core as Drilled, in. 9 8 3/4Diameter 1, in. 3.78 3.78Diameter 2, in. 3.78 3.78Average Diameter, in. 3.78 3.78Cross-Sectional Area, in2 11.22 11.22Length Trimmed, in. 5.9 7.1Length Capped, in. 5.9 7.3

Density, lb/ft3 154 154

Compressive Strength and Fracture PatternMaximum Load, lb 102,400 121,500Uncorrected Compressive Strength, psi 9,130 10,830Ratio of Capped Length to Diameter 1.57 1.93Correction Factor 0.97 1.00Corrected Compressive Strength, psi 8,860 10,830Fracture Pattern Type 1 Type 1

Notes:1. Per ASTM C42, test samples were wet saw-cut and then sealed in bag for at least 5 days prior to testing.2. Per Section 7.1, the preferred minimum core diameter is three times the nominal maximum size of the coarse aggregate, but it should be at least two times the nominal maximum size of the coarse aggregate.3. Cores were taken from the top surface of arch ribs at approximately the 1/4 points of the arches. The core axes are transverse to the axis of the arches.4. This report represents specifically the samples submitted.5. This report may not be reproduced except in its entirety.

ASTM C 42 / C 42M - 04Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete

Section 7: Cores for Compressive Strength

Schematic of Typical Fracture Patterns

< 1 in. [25 mm]

Type 1Reasonable well-formed cones on both ends, less

than 1 in. [25 mm] of cracking through caps

Type 2Well-formed cone on one end, vertical cracks running through caps, no well-defined cone on

other end

Type 3Columnar vertical cracking through both ends, no well-

formed cones

Type 4Diagonal fracture with no

cracking through ends; tap with hammer to distinguish

from Type I

Type 5Side fractures at top or

bottom (occur commonly with unbonded caps)

Type 6Similar to Type 5 but end of

cylinder is pointed

QOF 39-001-AwRev 5 Corporate Office and Laboratory: 5400 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, IL 60077-1030 Page 1 of 3

Page 4: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports

Client: CH2M Hill CTLGroup Project No.: 150721

Project: Latah Bridge Rehabilitation Study CTLGroup Project Mgr.: Q. Li

Technician: P. Brindise

Report Date: November 8, 2011 Approved By: J. L. Jones

Specimen IdentificationClient Identification B2 C7CTLGroup Identification 2970405 2970406Date Core Obtained from the Field 10/4/2011 10/4/2011Date Core Placed in Sealed Bag after Saw Cutting 10/24/2011 10/24/2011Date Core was Tested 10/31/2011 10/31/2011

Concrete DescriptionNominal Maximum Aggregate Size, in. 2 1 1/2Concrete Age at Test ~ 100 yrs ~ 100 yrsMoisture Condition at Test Note 1 Note 1Orientation of Core Axis in Structure Note 3 Note 3

Concrete DimensionsLength of Core as Drilled, in. 9 8Diameter 1, in. 3.77 3.78Diameter 2, in. 3.78 3.79Average Diameter, in. 3.78 3.79Cross-Sectional Area, in2 11.22 11.28Length Trimmed, in. 6.3 6.6Length Capped, in. 6.4 6.8

Density, lb/ft3 152 151

Compressive Strength and Fracture PatternMaximum Load, lb 82,800 105,000Uncorrected Compressive Strength, psi 7,380 9,310Ratio of Capped Length to Diameter 1.70 1.79Correction Factor 0.98 1.00Corrected Compressive Strength, psi 7,230 9,310Fracture Pattern Type 2 Type 1

Notes:1. Per ASTM C42, test samples were wet saw-cut and then sealed in bag for at least 5 days prior to testing.2. Per Section 7.1, the preferred minimum core diameter is three times the nominal maximum size of the coarse aggregate, but it should be at least two times the nominal maximum size of the coarse aggregate.3. Cores were taken from the top surface of arch ribs at approximately the 1/4 points of the arches. The core axes are transverse to the axis of the arches.4. This report represents specifically the samples submitted.5. This report may not be reproduced except in its entirety.

ASTM C 42 / C 42M - 04Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete

Section 7: Cores for Compressive Strength

Schematic of Typical Fracture Patterns

< 1 in. [25 mm]

Type 1Reasonable well-formed cones on both ends, less

than 1 in. [25 mm] of cracking through caps

Type 2Well-formed cone on one end, vertical cracks running through caps, no well-defined cone on

other end

Type 3Columnar vertical cracking through both ends, no well-

formed cones

Type 4Diagonal fracture with no

cracking through ends; tap with hammer to distinguish

from Type I

Type 5Side fractures at top or

bottom (occur commonly with unbonded caps)

Type 6Similar to Type 5 but end of

cylinder is pointed

QOF 39-001-AwRev 5 Corporate Office and Laboratory: 5400 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, IL 60077-1030 Page 2 of 3

Page 5: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports

Client: CH2M Hill CTLGroup Project No.: 150721

Project: Latah Bridge Rehabilitation Study CTLGroup Project Mgr.: Q. Li

Technician: P. Brindise

Report Date: November 8, 2011 Approved By: J. L. Jones

Specimen IdentificationClient Identification D D4 D8CTLGroup Identification 2970402 2970407 2970408Date Core Obtained from the Field 10/4/2011 10/4/2011 10/4/2011Date Core Placed in Sealed Bag after Saw Cutting 10/24/2011 10/24/2011 10/24/2011Date Core was Tested 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2011

Concrete DescriptionNominal Maximum Aggregate Size, in. 1 1/2 1 1/2 1 1/2Concrete Age at Test ~ 100 yrs ~ 100 yrs ~ 100 yrsMoisture Condition at Test Note 1 Note 1 Note 1Orientation of Core Axis in Structure Vertical Vertical Vertical

Concrete DimensionsLength of Core as Drilled, in. 9 1/2 8 1/4 7 1/4Diameter 1, in. 3.77 3.78 3.78Diameter 2, in. 3.78 3.78 3.77Average Diameter, in. 3.78 3.78 3.78Cross-Sectional Area, in2 11.22 11.22 11.22Length Trimmed, in. 6.2 4.4 5.7Length Capped, in. 6.4 4.6 5.9

Density, lb/ft3 151 149 153

Compressive Strength and Fracture PatternMaximum Load, lb 96,400 115,400 113,400Uncorrected Compressive Strength, psi 8,590 10,290 10,110Ratio of Capped Length to Diameter 1.69 1.22 1.57Correction Factor 0.98 0.92 0.97Corrected Compressive Strength, psi 8,420 9,470 9,810Fracture Pattern Type 2 Type 1 Type 2

Notes:1. Per ASTM C42, test samples were wet saw-cut and then sealed in bag for at least 5 days prior to testing.2. Per Section 7.1, the preferred minimum core diameter is three times the nominal maximum size of the coarse aggregate, but it should be at least two times the nominal maximum size of the coarse aggregate.3. This report represents specifically the samples submitted.4. This report may not be reproduced except in its entirety.

ASTM C 42 / C 42M - 04Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete

Section 7: Cores for Compressive Strength

Schematic of Typical Fracture Patterns

< 1 in. [25 mm]

Type 1Reasonable well-formed cones on both ends, less

than 1 in. [25 mm] of cracking through caps

Type 2Well-formed cone on one end, vertical cracks running through caps, no well-defined cone on

other end

Type 3Columnar vertical cracking through both ends, no well-

formed cones

Type 4Diagonal fracture with no

cracking through ends; tap with hammer to distinguish

from Type I

Type 5Side fractures at top or

bottom (occur commonly with unbonded caps)

Type 6Similar to Type 5 but end of

cylinder is pointed

QOF 39-001-AwRev 5 Corporate Office and Laboratory: 5400 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, IL 60077-1030 Page 3 of 3

Page 6: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 7: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 8: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 9: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 10: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 11: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 12: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 13: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 14: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 15: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 16: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 17: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 18: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 19: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 20: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 21: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports
Page 22: Appendix B: Bridge Material Testing Reports

Recommended