+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares...

Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares...

Date post: 06-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
32
Page F-1 Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured Values and Modeled Values for Flow and Water Quality Used in the Chollas Creek Metals Total Maximum Daily Load California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region
Transcript
Page 1: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-1

Appendix F

Statistical Comparison of Measured

Values and Modeled Values for

Flow and Water Quality

Used in the Chollas Creek Metals Total Maximum Daily Load

California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region

Page 2: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-1

Introduction

This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data are presented side-by-side for direct comparison. Simple statistical comparisons are also offered.

Flow

Table 1 lists all modeled and measured values from November 1, 2001 to December 30, 2003 for the Chollas Creek Watershed. Table 2 shows all observed values above 2.28 cubic feet per second (cfs), which is the definition of wet weather conditions, and the corresponding modeled average flows. Also in Table 2 are the percent and actual differences. Table 3 gives the total volume per day in cubic feet (cf) for corresponding dates in Table 2. Figure 1 plots volume per day from the model versus volume per day from the observed values. The R2 value is 0.7035 for 26 data pairs. Table 4 gives the total volume for the 28 days in liters for modeled and observed values and the percent differences and actual differences between the two. Table 5 gives summary statistics of the 26 values in both the modeled and observed value data sets and from the percent differences and actual differences.

Water Quality

Tables 6 and 7 show the measured water quality data and the corresponding model results. Tables 8 and 9 show the percent and actual differences of the water quality data that corresponds with flows over 2.28 cfs. Tables 10 and 11 show the five dates that both measured flow and water quality data were available. The loads per day were calculated and compared, by percent and actual difference, with the model values for the same days.

Page 3: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-2

Table 1. All modeled and measured values. Observed values have approximately the same

significant figures as the original values in copermittees reports.

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2001 11 1 11/1/01 0.000

2001 11 2 11/2/01 0.000

2001 11 3 11/3/01 0.000

2001 11 4 11/4/01 6.723

2001 11 5 11/5/01 13.326

2001 11 6 11/6/01 0.082

2001 11 7 11/7/01 0.080

2001 11 8 11/8/01 0.059

2001 11 9 11/9/01 0.060

2001 11 10 11/10/01 0.069

2001 11 11 11/11/01 0.059

2001 11 12 11/12/01 10.591

2001 11 13 11/13/01 1.907

2001 11 14 11/14/01 0.099

2001 11 15 11/15/01 0.088

2001 11 16 11/16/01 0.090

2001 11 17 11/17/01 0.091

2001 11 18 11/18/01 0.087

2001 11 19 11/19/01 0.074

2001 11 20 11/20/01 0.075

2001 11 21 11/21/01 0.076

2001 11 22 11/22/01 0.077

2001 11 23 11/23/01 0.074

2001 11 24 11/24/01 15.867

2001 11 25 11/25/01 0.791

2001 11 26 11/26/01 0.133

2001 11 27 11/27/01 0.106

2001 11 28 11/28/01 0.114 0

2001 11 29 11/29/01 2.801 18

2001 11 30 11/30/01 0.207

2001 12 1 12/1/01 0.126

2001 12 2 12/2/01 0.112

2001 12 3 12/3/01 0.183

2001 12 4 12/4/01 0.570

2001 12 5 12/5/01 0.115

2001 12 6 12/6/01 0.086

2001 12 7 12/7/01 0.047

2001 12 8 12/8/01 0.005

2001 12 9 12/9/01 0.070

2001 12 10 12/10/01 0.085

2001 12 11 12/11/01 0.073

2001 12 12 12/12/01 0.073

2001 12 13 12/13/01 0.070

Page 4: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-3

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2001 12 14 12/14/01 0.082

2001 12 15 12/15/01 0.061

2001 12 16 12/16/01 0.058

2001 12 17 12/17/01 0.052

2001 12 18 12/18/01 0.053

2001 12 19 12/19/01 0.048

2001 12 20 12/20/01 0.054

2001 12 21 12/21/01 11.824

2001 12 22 12/22/01 0.134

2001 12 23 12/23/01 0.108

2001 12 24 12/24/01 0.081

2001 12 25 12/25/01 0.082

2001 12 26 12/26/01 0.078

2001 12 27 12/27/01 0.079

2001 12 28 12/28/01 0.084

2001 12 29 12/29/01 0.080

2001 12 30 12/30/01 0.073

2001 12 31 12/31/01 0.084

2002 1 1 1/1/02 0.070

2002 1 2 1/2/02 0.064

2002 1 3 1/3/02 5.539

2002 1 4 1/4/02 0.084

2002 1 5 1/5/02 0.077

2002 1 6 1/6/02 0.068

2002 1 7 1/7/02 0.054

2002 1 8 1/8/02 0.055

2002 1 9 1/9/02 0.067

2002 1 10 1/10/02 0.054

2002 1 11 1/11/02 0.047

2002 1 12 1/12/02 0.031

2002 1 13 1/13/02 0.044

2002 1 14 1/14/02 0.048

2002 1 15 1/15/02 0.054

2002 1 16 1/16/02 0.044

2002 1 17 1/17/02 0.042

2002 1 18 1/18/02 0.040

2002 1 19 1/19/02 0.036

2002 1 20 1/20/02 0.037

2002 1 21 1/21/02 0.033

2002 1 22 1/22/02 0.034

2002 1 23 1/23/02 0.027

2002 1 24 1/24/02 0.024

2002 1 25 1/25/02 0.026

2002 1 26 1/26/02 0.028

2002 1 27 1/27/02 0.027

Page 5: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-4

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2002 1 28 1/28/02 0.026

2002 1 29 1/29/02 4.119

2002 1 30 1/30/02 0.057

2002 1 31 1/31/02 0.043

2002 2 1 2/1/02 0.035

2002 2 2 2/2/02 0.032

2002 2 3 2/3/02 0.032

2002 2 4 2/4/02 0.029

2002 2 5 2/5/02 0.026

2002 2 6 2/6/02 0.028

2002 2 7 2/7/02 0.027

2002 2 8 2/8/02 0.028

2002 2 9 2/9/02 0.013

2002 2 10 2/10/02 0.000

2002 2 11 2/11/02 0.013

2002 2 12 2/12/02 0.017

2002 2 13 2/13/02 0.020

2002 2 14 2/14/02 0.020

2002 2 15 2/15/02 0.019

2002 2 16 2/16/02 0.021

2002 2 17 2/17/02 7.614 3

2002 2 18 2/18/02 0.401

2002 2 19 2/19/02 0.055

2002 2 20 2/20/02 0.041

2002 2 21 2/21/02 0.021

2002 2 22 2/22/02 0.012

2002 2 23 2/23/02 0.036

2002 2 24 2/24/02 0.034

2002 2 25 2/25/02 0.032

2002 2 26 2/26/02 0.015

2002 2 27 2/27/02 0.024

2002 2 28 2/28/02 0.029

2002 3 1 3/1/02 0.028

2002 3 2 3/2/02 0.023

2002 3 3 3/3/02 0.021

2002 3 4 3/4/02 0.021

2002 3 5 3/5/02 0.023

2002 3 6 3/6/02 0.024

2002 3 7 3/7/02 0.023 7

2002 3 8 3/8/02 0.021 1

2002 3 9 3/9/02 0.018

2002 3 10 3/10/02 0.018

2002 3 11 3/11/02 0.018

2002 3 12 3/12/02 0.016

2002 3 13 3/13/02 0.018

Page 6: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-5

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2002 3 14 3/14/02 0.016

2002 3 15 3/15/02 0.014

2002 3 16 3/16/02 0.014

2002 3 17 3/17/02 14.441

2002 3 18 3/18/02 22.644

2002 3 19 3/19/02 0.136

2002 3 20 3/20/02 0.124

2002 3 21 3/21/02 0.113

2002 3 22 3/22/02 0.107

2002 3 23 3/23/02 0.110

2002 3 24 3/24/02 0.098

2002 3 25 3/25/02 0.093

2002 3 26 3/26/02 0.089

2002 3 27 3/27/02 0.097

2002 3 28 3/28/02 0.122

2002 3 29 3/29/02 0.083

2002 3 30 3/30/02 0.085

2002 3 31 3/31/02 0.071

2002 4 1 4/1/02 0.068

2002 4 2 4/2/02 0.069

2002 4 3 4/3/02 0.071

2002 4 4 4/4/02 0.063

2002 4 5 4/5/02 0.069

2002 4 6 4/6/02 0.058

2002 4 7 4/7/02 0.052

2002 4 8 4/8/02 0.053

2002 4 9 4/9/02 0.051

2002 4 10 4/10/02 0.045

2002 4 11 4/11/02 0.043

2002 4 12 4/12/02 0.039

2002 4 13 4/13/02 0.039

2002 4 14 4/14/02 0.035

2002 4 15 4/15/02 0.039

2002 4 16 4/16/02 0.035

2002 4 17 4/17/02 0.036

2002 4 18 4/18/02 0.032

2002 4 19 4/19/02 0.030

2002 4 20 4/20/02 0.027

2002 4 21 4/21/02 0.026

2002 4 22 4/22/02 0.023

2002 4 23 4/23/02 0.024

2002 4 24 4/24/02 0.031

2002 4 25 4/25/02 0.022

2002 4 26 4/26/02 0.026

2002 4 27 4/27/02 0.022

Page 7: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-6

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2002 4 28 4/28/02 0.019

2002 4 29 4/29/02 0.017

2002 4 30 4/30/02 0.018

2002 5 1 5/1/02 0.017

2002 5 2 5/2/02 0.015

2002 5 3 5/3/02 0.015

2002 5 4 5/4/02 0.015

2002 5 5 5/5/02 0.015

2002 5 6 5/6/02 0.015

2002 5 7 5/7/02 0.017

2002 5 8 5/8/02 0.013

2002 5 9 5/9/02 0.012

2002 5 10 5/10/02 0.012

2002 5 11 5/11/02 0.011

2002 5 12 5/12/02 0.009

2002 5 13 5/13/02 0.007

2002 5 14 5/14/02 0.009

2002 5 15 5/15/02 0.010

2002 5 16 5/16/02 0.010

2002 5 17 5/17/02 0.009

2002 5 18 5/18/02 0.010

2002 5 19 5/19/02 0.009

2002 5 20 5/20/02 0.007

2002 5 21 5/21/02 0.007

2002 5 22 5/22/02 0.006

2002 5 23 5/23/02 0.006

2002 5 24 5/24/02 0.006

2002 5 25 5/25/02 0.007

2002 5 26 5/26/02 0.006

2002 5 27 5/27/02 0.006

2002 5 28 5/28/02 0.005

2002 5 29 5/29/02 0.005

2002 5 30 5/30/02 0.005

2002 5 31 5/31/02 0.004

2002 6 1 6/1/02 0.005

2002 6 2 6/2/02 0.004

2002 6 3 6/3/02 0.004

2002 6 4 6/4/02 0.004

2002 6 5 6/5/02 0.004

2002 6 6 6/6/02 0.003

2002 6 7 6/7/02 0.003

2002 6 8 6/8/02 0.003

2002 6 9 6/9/02 0.004

2002 6 10 6/10/02 0.004

2002 6 11 6/11/02 0.003

Page 8: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-7

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2002 6 12 6/12/02 0.003

2002 6 13 6/13/02 0.003

2002 6 14 6/14/02 0.002

2002 6 15 6/15/02 0.002

2002 6 16 6/16/02 0.002

2002 6 17 6/17/02 0.002

2002 6 18 6/18/02 0.002

2002 6 19 6/19/02 0.002

2002 6 20 6/20/02 0.002

2002 6 21 6/21/02 0.002

2002 6 22 6/22/02 0.002

2002 6 23 6/23/02 0.002

2002 6 24 6/24/02 0.002

2002 6 25 6/25/02 0.002

2002 6 26 6/26/02 0.002

2002 6 27 6/27/02 0.001

2002 6 28 6/28/02 0.001

2002 6 29 6/29/02 0.001

2002 6 30 6/30/02 0.001

2002 7 1 7/1/02 0.001

2002 7 2 7/2/02 0.001

2002 7 3 7/3/02 0.001

2002 7 4 7/4/02 0.001

2002 7 5 7/5/02 0.001

2002 7 6 7/6/02 0.001

2002 7 7 7/7/02 0.001

2002 7 8 7/8/02 0.001

2002 7 9 7/9/02 0.001

2002 7 10 7/10/02 0.001

2002 7 11 7/11/02 0.001

2002 7 12 7/12/02 0.001

2002 7 13 7/13/02 0.001

2002 7 14 7/14/02 0.001

2002 7 15 7/15/02 0.001

2002 7 16 7/16/02 0.001

2002 7 17 7/17/02 0.001

2002 7 18 7/18/02 0.001

2002 7 19 7/19/02 0.001

2002 7 20 7/20/02 0.001

2002 7 21 7/21/02 0.001

2002 7 22 7/22/02 0.001

2002 7 23 7/23/02 0.000

2002 7 24 7/24/02 0.000

2002 7 25 7/25/02 0.000

2002 7 26 7/26/02 0.000

Page 9: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-8

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2002 7 27 7/27/02 0.000

2002 7 28 7/28/02 0.000

2002 7 29 7/29/02 0.000

2002 7 30 7/30/02 0.000

2002 7 31 7/31/02 0.000

2002 8 1 8/1/02 0.000

2002 8 2 8/2/02 0.000

2002 8 3 8/3/02 0.000

2002 8 4 8/4/02 0.000

2002 8 5 8/5/02 0.000

2002 8 6 8/6/02 0.000

2002 8 7 8/7/02 0.000

2002 8 8 8/8/02 0.000

2002 8 9 8/9/02 0.000

2002 8 10 8/10/02 0.000

2002 8 11 8/11/02 0.000

2002 8 12 8/12/02 0.000

2002 8 13 8/13/02 0.000

2002 8 14 8/14/02 0.000

2002 8 15 8/15/02 0.000

2002 8 16 8/16/02 0.000

2002 8 17 8/17/02 0.000

2002 8 18 8/18/02 0.000

2002 8 19 8/19/02 0.000

2002 8 20 8/20/02 0.000

2002 8 21 8/21/02 0.000

2002 8 22 8/22/02 0.000

2002 8 23 8/23/02 0.000

2002 8 24 8/24/02 0.000

2002 8 25 8/25/02 0.000

2002 8 26 8/26/02 0.000

2002 8 27 8/27/02 0.000

2002 8 28 8/28/02 0.000

2002 8 29 8/29/02 0.000

2002 8 30 8/30/02 0.000

2002 8 31 8/31/02 0.000

2002 9 1 9/1/02 0.000

2002 9 2 9/2/02 0.000

2002 9 3 9/3/02 0.000

2002 9 4 9/4/02 0.000

2002 9 5 9/5/02 0.000

2002 9 6 9/6/02 2.065

2002 9 7 9/7/02 23.162

2002 9 8 9/8/02 0.069

2002 9 9 9/9/02 0.062

Page 10: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-9

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2002 9 10 9/10/02 0.055

2002 9 11 9/11/02 0.057

2002 9 12 9/12/02 0.054

2002 9 13 9/13/02 0.048

2002 9 14 9/14/02 0.046

2002 9 15 9/15/02 0.044

2002 9 16 9/16/02 0.045

2002 9 17 9/17/02 0.044

2002 9 18 9/18/02 0.045

2002 9 19 9/19/02 0.037

2002 9 20 9/20/02 0.038

2002 9 21 9/21/02 0.037

2002 9 22 9/22/02 0.033

2002 9 23 9/23/02 0.031

2002 9 24 9/24/02 0.030

2002 9 25 9/25/02 0.031

2002 9 26 9/26/02 0.029

2002 9 27 9/27/02 0.030

2002 9 28 9/28/02 0.033

2002 9 29 9/29/02 0.030

2002 9 30 9/30/02 0.028

2002 10 1 10/1/02 0.027

2002 10 2 10/2/02 0.023

2002 10 3 10/3/02 0.022

2002 10 4 10/4/02 0.021

2002 10 5 10/5/02 0.019

2002 10 6 10/6/02 0.019

2002 10 7 10/7/02 0.017

2002 10 8 10/8/02 0.018

2002 10 9 10/9/02 0.017

2002 10 10 10/10/02 0.017

2002 10 11 10/11/02 0.017

2002 10 12 10/12/02 0.019

2002 10 13 10/13/02 0.015

2002 10 14 10/14/02 0.016

2002 10 15 10/15/02 0.016

2002 10 16 10/16/02 0.016

2002 10 17 10/17/02 0.016

2002 10 18 10/18/02 0.015

2002 10 19 10/19/02 0.014

2002 10 20 10/20/02 0.012

2002 10 21 10/21/02 0.013

2002 10 22 10/22/02 0.012

2002 10 23 10/23/02 0.011

2002 10 24 10/24/02 0.011

Page 11: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-10

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2002 10 25 10/25/02 0.011

2002 10 26 10/26/02 0.010

2002 10 27 10/27/02 0.009

2002 10 28 10/28/02 0.009

2002 10 29 10/29/02 0.009

2002 10 30 10/30/02 0.008

2002 10 31 10/31/02 0.008

2002 11 1 11/1/02 0.008 0

2002 11 2 11/2/02 0.007 0

2002 11 3 11/3/02 0.006 0

2002 11 4 11/4/02 0.007 0

2002 11 5 11/5/02 0.006 0

2002 11 6 11/6/02 0.006 0

2002 11 7 11/7/02 0.006 0

2002 11 8 11/8/02 3.241 35

2002 11 9 11/9/02 8.193 43

2002 11 10 11/10/02 0.967 13

2002 11 11 11/11/02 0.048

2002 11 12 11/12/02 0.017

2002 11 13 11/13/02 0.035

2002 11 14 11/14/02 0.032

2002 11 15 11/15/02 0.010

2002 11 16 11/16/02 0.010

2002 11 17 11/17/02 0.030

2002 11 18 11/18/02 0.021

2002 11 19 11/19/02 0.019

2002 11 20 11/20/02 0.014

2002 11 21 11/21/02 0.011

2002 11 22 11/22/02 0.023

2002 11 23 11/23/02 0.026

2002 11 24 11/24/02 0.024

2002 11 25 11/25/02 0.016

2002 11 26 11/26/02 0.013

2002 11 27 11/27/02 0.009

2002 11 28 11/28/02 0.009

2002 11 29 11/29/02 0.020

2002 11 30 11/30/02 0.018

2002 12 1 12/1/02 0.019

2002 12 2 12/2/02 0.017

2002 12 3 12/3/02 0.017

2002 12 4 12/4/02 0.015

2002 12 5 12/5/02 0.014

2002 12 6 12/6/02 0.013

2002 12 7 12/7/02 0.014

2002 12 8 12/8/02 0.013

Page 12: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-11

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2002 12 9 12/9/02 0.013

2002 12 10 12/10/02 0.013

2002 12 11 12/11/02 0.012

2002 12 12 12/12/02 0.011

2002 12 13 12/13/02 0.011 0

2002 12 14 12/14/02 0.011 0

2002 12 15 12/15/02 0.010 0

2002 12 16 12/16/02 0.010 30

2002 12 17 12/17/02 0.010 0

2002 12 18 12/18/02 0.009 0

2002 12 19 12/19/02 0.008 5

2002 12 20 12/20/02 0.010 0

2002 12 21 12/21/02 0.009 0

2002 12 22 12/22/02 0.008 0

2002 12 23 12/23/02 0.007 0

2002 12 24 12/24/02 0.008 0

2002 12 25 12/25/02 0.007 0

2002 12 26 12/26/02 0.007 0

2002 12 27 12/27/02 0.006 0

2002 12 28 12/28/02 0.006 0

2002 12 29 12/29/02 0.006 0

2002 12 30 12/30/02 0.006 0

2002 12 31 12/31/02 0.005 0

2003 1 1 1/1/03 0.004 0

2003 1 2 1/2/03 0.004 0

2003 1 3 1/3/03 0.004 0

2003 1 4 1/4/03 0.004 0

2003 1 5 1/5/03 0.004 0

2003 1 6 1/6/03 0.003 0

2003 1 7 1/7/03 0.003 0

2003 1 8 1/8/03 0.003 0

2003 1 9 1/9/03 0.003 0

2003 1 10 1/10/03 0.003 0

2003 1 11 1/11/03 0.003

2003 1 12 1/12/03 0.003

2003 1 13 1/13/03 0.003

2003 1 14 1/14/03 0.002

2003 1 15 1/15/03 0.002

2003 1 16 1/16/03 0.002

2003 1 17 1/17/03 0.002

2003 1 18 1/18/03 0.002

2003 1 19 1/19/03 0.002

2003 1 20 1/20/03 0.002

2003 1 21 1/21/03 0.002

2003 1 22 1/22/03 0.002

Page 13: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-12

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2003 1 23 1/23/03 0.001

2003 1 24 1/24/03 0.001

2003 1 25 1/25/03 0.001

2003 1 26 1/26/03 0.001

2003 1 27 1/27/03 0.001

2003 1 28 1/28/03 0.001

2003 1 29 1/29/03 0.001

2003 1 30 1/30/03 0.001

2003 1 31 1/31/03 0.001

2003 2 1 2/1/03 0.001

2003 2 2 2/2/03 0.001

2003 2 3 2/3/03 0.001

2003 2 4 2/4/03 0.001

2003 2 5 2/5/03 0.001

2003 2 6 2/6/03 0.001

2003 2 7 2/7/03 0.001 0

2003 2 8 2/8/03 0.001

2003 2 9 2/9/03 0.001

2003 2 10 2/10/03 0.001

2003 2 11 2/11/03 50.308 59

2003 2 12 2/12/03 153.553

2003 2 13 2/13/03 116.327

2003 2 14 2/14/03 55.564

2003 2 15 2/15/03 2.439

2003 2 16 2/16/03 2.031

2003 2 17 2/17/03 1.739

2003 2 18 2/18/03 1.538

2003 2 19 2/19/03 1.410

2003 2 20 2/20/03 1.244

2003 2 21 2/21/03 1.120

2003 2 22 2/22/03 1.042

2003 2 23 2/23/03 0.943

2003 2 24 2/24/03 0.866 0

2003 2 25 2/25/03 190.710 132

2003 2 26 2/26/03 28.383 13

2003 2 27 2/27/03 31.744 86

2003 2 28 2/28/03 8.011 31

2003 3 1 3/1/03 5.550 0

2003 3 2 3/2/03 4.193 10

2003 3 3 3/3/03 3.367 2

2003 3 4 3/4/03 2.781 31

2003 3 5 3/5/03 2.912 45

2003 3 6 3/6/03 2.097 5

2003 3 7 3/7/03 1.839 12

2003 3 8 3/8/03 1.629 20

Page 14: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-13

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2003 3 9 3/9/03 1.481 17

2003 3 10 3/10/03 1.373 12

2003 3 11 3/11/03 1.279 8

2003 3 12 3/12/03 1.164 8

2003 3 13 3/13/03 1.088 18

2003 3 14 3/14/03 1.018 10

2003 3 15 3/15/03 96.332

2003 3 16 3/16/03 51.539

2003 3 17 3/17/03 5.526

2003 3 18 3/18/03 4.174

2003 3 19 3/19/03 3.297

2003 3 20 3/20/03 2.713

2003 3 21 3/21/03 2.300

2003 3 22 3/22/03 1.996

2003 3 23 3/23/03 1.824

2003 3 24 3/24/03 1.650

2003 3 25 3/25/03 1.493

2003 3 26 3/26/03 1.389

2003 3 27 3/27/03 1.301

2003 3 28 3/28/03 1.188

2003 3 29 3/29/03 1.114

2003 3 30 3/30/03 1.040

2003 3 31 3/31/03 1.141

2003 4 1 4/1/03 0.974

2003 4 2 4/2/03 0.920

2003 4 3 4/3/03 0.886

2003 4 4 4/4/03 0.849

2003 4 5 4/5/03 0.805

2003 4 6 4/6/03 0.765

2003 4 7 4/7/03 0.705

2003 4 8 4/8/03 0.636

2003 4 9 4/9/03 0.612

2003 4 10 4/10/03 0.603

2003 4 11 4/11/03 0.567

2003 4 12 4/12/03 0.523

2003 4 13 4/13/03 0.504

2003 4 14 4/14/03 127.782

2003 4 15 4/15/03 6.659

2003 4 16 4/16/03 1.486

2003 4 17 4/17/03 23.888

2003 4 18 4/18/03 1.572

2003 4 19 4/19/03 1.378

2003 4 20 4/20/03 1.250

2003 4 21 4/21/03 1.163

2003 4 22 4/22/03 1.095

Page 15: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-14

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2003 4 23 4/23/03 1.018

2003 4 24 4/24/03 0.941

2003 4 25 4/25/03 0.882

2003 4 26 4/26/03 0.836

2003 4 27 4/27/03 0.793

2003 4 28 4/28/03 0.738

2003 4 29 4/29/03 0.704

2003 4 30 4/30/03 0.799

2003 5 1 5/1/03 0.639

2003 5 2 5/2/03 0.601

2003 5 3 5/3/03 21.329

2003 5 4 5/4/03 0.717

2003 5 5 5/5/03 0.634

2003 5 6 5/6/03 0.602

2003 5 7 5/7/03 0.564

2003 5 8 5/8/03 0.534

2003 5 9 5/9/03 0.506

2003 5 10 5/10/03 0.479

2003 5 11 5/11/03 0.442

2003 5 12 5/12/03 0.416

2003 5 13 5/13/03 0.390

2003 5 14 5/14/03 0.378

2003 5 15 5/15/03 0.360

2003 5 16 5/16/03 0.338

2003 5 17 5/17/03 0.322

2003 5 18 5/18/03 0.306

2003 5 19 5/19/03 0.289

2003 5 20 5/20/03 0.272

2003 5 21 5/21/03 0.255

2003 5 22 5/22/03 0.245

2003 5 23 5/23/03 0.236

2003 5 24 5/24/03 0.225

2003 5 25 5/25/03 0.212

2003 5 26 5/26/03 0.201

2003 5 27 5/27/03 0.189

2003 5 28 5/28/03 0.179

2003 5 29 5/29/03 0.172

2003 5 30 5/30/03 0.164

2003 5 31 5/31/03 0.197

2003 6 1 6/1/03 0.152

2003 6 2 6/2/03 0.145

2003 6 3 6/3/03 0.136

2003 6 4 6/4/03 0.129

2003 6 5 6/5/03 0.122

2003 6 6 6/6/03 0.116

Page 16: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-15

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2003 6 7 6/7/03 0.110

2003 6 8 6/8/03 0.104

2003 6 9 6/9/03 0.099

2003 6 10 6/10/03 0.090

2003 6 11 6/11/03 0.085

2003 6 12 6/12/03 0.080

2003 6 13 6/13/03 0.075

2003 6 14 6/14/03 0.070

2003 6 15 6/15/03 0.066

2003 6 16 6/16/03 0.061

2003 6 17 6/17/03 0.057

2003 6 18 6/18/03 0.053

2003 6 19 6/19/03 0.050

2003 6 20 6/20/03 0.046

2003 6 21 6/21/03 0.042

2003 6 22 6/22/03 0.039

2003 6 23 6/23/03 0.035

2003 6 24 6/24/03 0.032

2003 6 25 6/25/03 0.028

2003 6 26 6/26/03 0.025

2003 6 27 6/27/03 0.021

2003 6 28 6/28/03 0.018

2003 6 29 6/29/03 0.014

2003 6 30 6/30/03 0.012

2003 7 1 7/1/03 0.010

2003 7 2 7/2/03 0.009

2003 7 3 7/3/03 0.008

2003 7 4 7/4/03 0.008

2003 7 5 7/5/03 0.007

2003 7 6 7/6/03 0.007

2003 7 7 7/7/03 0.007

2003 7 8 7/8/03 0.007

2003 7 9 7/9/03 0.006

2003 7 10 7/10/03 0.007

2003 7 11 7/11/03 0.007

2003 7 12 7/12/03 0.007

2003 7 13 7/13/03 0.006

2003 7 14 7/14/03 0.006

2003 7 15 7/15/03 0.006

2003 7 16 7/16/03 0.006

2003 7 17 7/17/03 0.005

2003 7 18 7/18/03 0.005

2003 7 19 7/19/03 0.005

2003 7 20 7/20/03 0.005

2003 7 21 7/21/03 0.004

Page 17: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-16

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2003 7 22 7/22/03 0.004

2003 7 23 7/23/03 0.004

2003 7 24 7/24/03 0.004

2003 7 25 7/25/03 0.004

2003 7 26 7/26/03 0.004

2003 7 27 7/27/03 0.003

2003 7 28 7/28/03 0.003

2003 7 29 7/29/03 0.003

2003 7 30 7/30/03 0.003

2003 7 31 7/31/03 0.003

2003 8 1 8/1/03 0.003

2003 8 2 8/2/03 0.003

2003 8 3 8/3/03 0.003

2003 8 4 8/4/03 0.002

2003 8 5 8/5/03 0.002

2003 8 6 8/6/03 0.002

2003 8 7 8/7/03 0.002

2003 8 8 8/8/03 0.002

2003 8 9 8/9/03 0.002

2003 8 10 8/10/03 0.002

2003 8 11 8/11/03 0.002

2003 8 12 8/12/03 0.002

2003 8 13 8/13/03 0.002

2003 8 14 8/14/03 0.002

2003 8 15 8/15/03 0.002

2003 8 16 8/16/03 0.001

2003 8 17 8/17/03 0.001

2003 8 18 8/18/03 0.001

2003 8 19 8/19/03 0.001

2003 8 20 8/20/03 0.001

2003 8 21 8/21/03 0.001

2003 8 22 8/22/03 0.001

2003 8 23 8/23/03 0.001

2003 8 24 8/24/03 0.001

2003 8 25 8/25/03 0.001

2003 8 26 8/26/03 0.001

2003 8 27 8/27/03 0.001

2003 8 28 8/28/03 0.001

2003 8 29 8/29/03 0.001

2003 8 30 8/30/03 0.001

2003 8 31 8/31/03 0.001

2003 9 1 9/1/03 0.001

2003 9 2 9/2/03 0.001

2003 9 3 9/3/03 0.001

2003 9 4 9/4/03 0.001

Page 18: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-17

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2003 9 5 9/5/03 0.001

2003 9 6 9/6/03 0.001

2003 9 7 9/7/03 0.001

2003 9 8 9/8/03 0.001

2003 9 9 9/9/03 0.001

2003 9 10 9/10/03 0.001

2003 9 11 9/11/03 0.000

2003 9 12 9/12/03 0.000

2003 9 13 9/13/03 0.000

2003 9 14 9/14/03 0.000

2003 9 15 9/15/03 0.000

2003 9 16 9/16/03 0.000

2003 9 17 9/17/03 0.000

2003 9 18 9/18/03 0.000

2003 9 19 9/19/03 0.000

2003 9 20 9/20/03 0.000

2003 9 21 9/21/03 0.000

2003 9 22 9/22/03 0.000

2003 9 23 9/23/03 0.000

2003 9 24 9/24/03 0.000

2003 9 25 9/25/03 0.000

2003 9 26 9/26/03 0.000

2003 9 27 9/27/03 0.000

2003 9 28 9/28/03 0.000

2003 9 29 9/29/03 0.000

2003 9 30 9/30/03 0.000

2003 10 1 10/1/03 0.000

2003 10 2 10/2/03 0.000

2003 10 3 10/3/03 0.000

2003 10 4 10/4/03 0.000

2003 10 5 10/5/03 0.000

2003 10 6 10/6/03 0.000

2003 10 7 10/7/03 0.000

2003 10 8 10/8/03 0.000

2003 10 9 10/9/03 0.000

2003 10 10 10/10/03 0.000

2003 10 11 10/11/03 0.000

2003 10 12 10/12/03 0.000

2003 10 13 10/13/03 0.000

2003 10 14 10/14/03 0.000

2003 10 15 10/15/03 0.000

2003 10 16 10/16/03 0.000

2003 10 17 10/17/03 0.000

2003 10 18 10/18/03 0.000

2003 10 19 10/19/03 0.000

Page 19: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-18

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2003 10 20 10/20/03 0.000

2003 10 21 10/21/03 0.000

2003 10 22 10/22/03 0.000

2003 10 23 10/23/03 0.000

2003 10 24 10/24/03 0.000

2003 10 25 10/25/03 0.000

2003 10 26 10/26/03 0.000

2003 10 27 10/27/03 0.000

2003 10 28 10/28/03 0.000

2003 10 29 10/29/03 0.000

2003 10 30 10/30/03 0.000

2003 10 31 10/31/03 0.000

2003 11 1 11/1/03 0.000

2003 11 2 11/2/03 0.000

2003 11 3 11/3/03 0.000

2003 11 4 11/4/03 0.000

2003 11 5 11/5/03 0.000

2003 11 6 11/6/03 0.000

2003 11 7 11/7/03 0.000

2003 11 8 11/8/03 0.000

2003 11 9 11/9/03 0.000

2003 11 10 11/10/03 0.000

2003 11 11 11/11/03 0.000

2003 11 12 11/12/03 15.002

2003 11 13 11/13/03 0.056

2003 11 14 11/14/03 0.047

2003 11 15 11/15/03 0.039

2003 11 16 11/16/03 0.038

2003 11 17 11/17/03 0.036

2003 11 18 11/18/03 0.035

2003 11 19 11/19/03 0.033

2003 11 20 11/20/03 0.033

2003 11 21 11/21/03 0.031

2003 11 22 11/22/03 0.030

2003 11 23 11/23/03 0.030

2003 11 24 11/24/03 0.029

2003 11 25 11/25/03 0.028

2003 11 26 11/26/03 0.026

2003 11 27 11/27/03 0.025

2003 11 28 11/28/03 0.026

2003 11 29 11/29/03 0.025

2003 11 30 11/30/03 0.024

2003 12 1 12/1/03 0.023

2003 12 2 12/2/03 0.022

2003 12 3 12/3/03 0.021

Page 20: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-19

Year Month Day Date Model Daily

Average Flow Measured Daily Average Flow

Units cfs cfs

2003 12 4 12/4/03 0.020

2003 12 5 12/5/03 0.019

2003 12 6 12/6/03 0.019

2003 12 7 12/7/03 0.018

2003 12 8 12/8/03 0.017

2003 12 9 12/9/03 0.016

2003 12 10 12/10/03 0.016

2003 12 11 12/11/03 0.015

2003 12 12 12/12/03 0.014

2003 12 13 12/13/03 0.014

2003 12 14 12/14/03 0.013

2003 12 15 12/15/03 0.013

2003 12 16 12/16/03 0.012

2003 12 17 12/17/03 0.012

2003 12 18 12/18/03 0.011

2003 12 19 12/19/03 0.011

2003 12 20 12/20/03 0.010

2003 12 21 12/21/03 0.010

2003 12 22 12/22/03 0.009

2003 12 23 12/23/03 0.009

2003 12 24 12/24/03 0.278

2003 12 25 12/25/03 43.532

2003 12 26 12/26/03 0.878

2003 12 27 12/27/03 0.154

2003 12 28 12/28/03 0.146

2003 12 29 12/29/03 0.139

2003 12 30 12/30/03 0.133

Page 21: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-20

Table 2. Modeled Flow vs Measured Flows

Date

Model Daily

Average

Flow -cfs

Observed Daily

Average Flow -

cfs

Percent Difference -%,

difference of observed

from model over

observed

Actual

Difference -cfs,

observed from

model

11/29/01 2.801 18 -84.4% -15.20

2/17/02 7.614 3 153.8% 4.61

3/7/02 0.023 7 -99.7% -6.98

11/8/02 3.241 35 -90.7% -31.76

11/9/02 8.193 43 -80.9% -34.81

11/10/02 0.967 13 -92.6% -12.03

12/16/02 0.010 30 -99.97% -29.99

12/19/02 0.008 5 -99.8% -4.99

2/11/03 50.308 59 -14.7% -8.69

2/25/03 190.710 132 44.5% 58.71

2/26/03 28.383 13 118.3% 15.38

2/27/03 31.744 86 -63.1% -54.26

2/28/03 8.011 31 -74.2% -22.99

3/2/03 4.193 10 -58.1% -5.81

3/3/03 3.367 2 68.4% 1.37

3/4/03 2.781 31 -91.0% -28.22

3/5/03 2.912 45 -93.5% -42.09

3/6/03 2.097 5 -58.1% -2.90

3/7/03 1.839 12 -84.7% -10.16

3/8/03 1.629 20 -91.9% -18.37

3/9/03 1.481 17 -91.3% -15.52

3/10/03 1.373 12 -88.6% -10.63

3/11/03 1.279 8 -84.0% -6.72

3/12/03 1.164 8 -85.5% -6.84

3/13/03 1.088 18 -94.0% -16.91

3/14/03 1.018 10 -89.8% -8.98

Page 22: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-21

Table 3. Modeled Volume vs. Measured Volume

D a te

C h a n g in g M o d e l

V a lu e s to D a ily

V o lu m e , c f

C h a n g in g O b s e rve d

V a lu e s to D a ily

V o lu m e , c f

1 1 /2 9 /0 1 2 4 1 9 9 6 1 5 5 5 2 0 0

2 /1 7 /0 2 6 5 7 8 6 7 2 5 9 2 0 0

3 /7 /0 2 1 9 8 2 6 0 4 8 0 0

1 1 /8 /0 2 2 8 0 0 3 5 3 0 2 4 0 0 0

1 1 /9 /0 2 7 0 7 8 6 7 3 7 1 5 2 0 0

1 1 /1 0 /0 2 8 3 5 1 0 1 1 2 3 2 0 0

1 2 /1 6 /0 2 9 0 4 2 5 9 2 0 0 0

1 2 /1 9 /0 2 7 1 5 4 3 2 0 0 0

2 /1 1 /0 3 4 3 4 6 5 7 7 5 0 9 7 6 0 0

2 /2 5 /0 3 1 6 4 7 7 3 4 4 1 1 4 0 4 8 0 0

2 /2 6 /0 3 2 4 5 2 3 2 6 1 1 2 3 2 0 0

2 /2 7 /0 3 2 7 4 2 6 8 2 7 4 3 0 4 0 0

2 /2 8 /0 3 6 9 2 1 1 8 2 6 7 8 4 0 0

3 /2 /0 3 3 6 2 2 3 9 8 6 4 0 0 0

3 /3 /0 3 2 9 0 9 4 0 1 7 2 8 0 0

3 /4 /0 3 2 4 0 2 4 4 2 6 7 8 4 0 0

3 /5 /0 3 2 5 1 5 9 0 3 8 8 8 0 0 0

3 /6 /0 3 1 8 1 1 4 2 4 3 2 0 0 0

3 /7 /0 3 1 5 8 9 0 3 1 0 3 6 8 0 0

3 /8 /0 3 1 4 0 7 8 1 1 7 2 8 0 0 0

3 /9 /0 3 1 2 7 9 9 3 1 4 6 8 8 0 0

3 /1 0 /0 3 1 1 8 6 5 7 1 0 3 6 8 0 0

3 /1 1 /0 3 1 1 0 5 3 2 6 9 1 2 0 0

3 /1 2 /0 3 1 0 0 5 6 6 6 9 1 2 0 0

3 /1 3 /0 3 9 4 0 0 5 1 5 5 5 2 0 0

3 /1 4 /0 3 8 7 9 4 8 8 6 4 0 0 0

Page 23: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-22

R2 = 0.7035

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

0 5000 10000 15000 20000

Modeled Daily Volumes, CF x 1000

Observ

ed D

aily

Volu

mes, C

F x

1000

Figure 1. Measured Daily Volumes vs Modeled Daily Volumes

Table 4. Modeled Total Volume vs Measured Total Volume

Total

Modeled

Volumes for

26 days, L

Total

Observed

Volumes for

26 days, L

Percent

Difference -%,

difference of

observed from

model over

observed

Actual Difference

-L, observed

from model

876421612 1646496115 47% -770074503

Page 24: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-23

Table 5. Comparison of Modeled and Measured Flows

Mean 14 Mean 26

Median 2 Median 15

25th 1 25th 9

75th 7 75th 31

STDEV 38 STDEV 29

Mean -55% Mean -12

Median -85% Median -10

25th -92% 25th -22

75th -59% 75th -6

STDEV 0.70 STDEV 21

Statistics of Directly Comparable

Model Values to Observed

Values Above CFS of 2.28

(26 Values)

Statistics of Observed Values

Above CFS of 2.28

(26 Values)

Statistics of Percent Differences Statistics of Actual Differences

Page 25: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-24

Table 6. Modeled Water Quality, All Values.

Number Date Flow Total Copper Total Lead Total Zinc

µg/L µg/L µg/L

19004 2/17/94 80.6874 14 14 78

19004 3/24/94 77.9417 6 6 35

19004 4/24/94 15.4465 32 34 175

19004 11/10/94 14.4909 24 24 134

19004 1/11/95 47.9248 5 5 30

19004 2/14/95 285.361 31 31 173

19004 4/16/95 47.6048 32 32 176

19004 11/1/95 24.6359 74 76 408

19004 12/9/96 10.7718 19 18 106

19004 1/16/97 1.78252 1 0 4

19004 12/6/97 51.7472 53 53 294

19004 3/14/98 2.98883 0 0 0

19004 11/8/98 28.7118 41 42 228

19004 1/25/99 88.7292 42 43 231

19004 3/15/99 8.14882 39 39 216

19004 2/12/00 45.11 43 44 237

19004 2/21/00 216.509 22 22 121

19004 3/5/00 79.8623 24 24 134

19004 4/17/00 41.7563 21 22 118

19004 10/27/00 37.9718 28 28 157

19004 1/8/01 28.0362 26 26 142

19004 2/13/01 54.4753 50 50 280

19004 11/12/01 10.5909 17 18 95

19004 11/29/01 2.80088 32 32 175

19004 2/17/02 7.6142 53 54 293

19004 11/8/02 3.24115 33 34 183

19004 2/11/03 50.3076 38 38 206

19004 2/25/03 190.71 23 23 129

19006 2/12/00 13.2766 63 74 316

19006 2/21/00 63.4845 25 28 128

19006 1/8/01 8.38546 31 36 157

19006 2/13/01 16.4391 57 64 293

19006 11/12/01 3.47155 17 20 89

19014 1/8/01 0.866875 27 32 151

19014 2/13/01 1.68843 51 59 292

19014 11/12/01 0.362798 12 14 69

19016 2/12/00 7.75739 33 33 181

19016 2/21/00 37.1424 17 16 93

19016 1/8/01 4.87796 17 17 96

19016 2/13/01 9.55507 38 36 212

19016 11/12/01 1.94136 11 10 58

19018 1/8/01 11.6857 22 19 125

19018 2/13/01 22.7255 46 40 267

19018 11/12/01 4.22921 16 14 91

19024 2/12/00 30.7277 40 38 221

Page 26: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-25

Number Date Flow Total Copper Total Lead Total Zinc

µg/L µg/L µg/L

19024 2/21/00 150.342 21 20 120

19024 1/8/01 18.9028 28 26 154

19024 2/13/01 37.2259 50 47 282

19024 11/12/01 7.10023 18 17 102

19026 1/8/01 14.8463 25 23 140

19026 2/13/01 29.3028 48 44 275

19026 11/12/01 5.99581 16 15 91

19028 2/12/00 9.20883 60 60 332

19028 2/21/00 44.0897 28 27 159

19028 1/8/01 5.8327 31 30 169

19028 2/13/01 11.6731 60 56 334

19028 11/12/01 2.49796 15 15 85

19035 2/12/00 2.48031 20 18 110

19035 2/21/00 11.9094 11 10 64

19035 1/8/01 1.57353 10 9 58

19035 2/13/01 3.18453 24 22 134

19035 11/12/01 0.668691 6 6 35

Table 7. Observed Water Quality, All Values. Subwatershed

Number

Date Total Copper Total Lead Total Zinc

µg/L µg/L µg/L

19004 2/17/94 34 110 260

19004 3/24/94 29 140 240

19004 4/24/94 44 70 320

19004 11/10/94 36 35 180

19004 1/11/95 17 44 150

19004 2/14/95 40 110 360

19004 4/16/95 85 140 560

19004 11/1/95 46 23 25

19004 12/9/96 20 16 70

19004 1/16/97 10 58 200

19004 12/6/97 28 42 110

19004 3/14/98 28 95 92

19004 11/8/98 6 1 30

19004 1/25/99 5 7 48

19004 3/15/99 15 82 210

19004 2/12/00 29 15 96

19004 2/21/00 16 1 50

19004 3/5/00 16 1 50

19004 4/17/00 14 5 80

19004 10/27/00 27 22 150

19004 1/8/01 57 69 255

19004 2/13/01 16 25 110

19004 11/12/01 97 94 740

19004 11/29/01 27 28 162

19004 2/17/02 53 32 314

Page 27: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-26

Subwatershed

Number

Date Total Copper Total Lead Total Zinc

µg/L µg/L µg/L

19004 11/8/02 28 17 118

19004 2/11/03 33 29 230

19004 2/25/03 16 23 154

19006 2/12/00 68 34 160

19006 2/21/00 23 23 180

19006 1/8/01 52 91 420

19006 2/13/01 16 29 100

19006 11/12/01 49 39 370

19014 1/8/01 36 21 230

19014 2/13/01 19 18 110

19014 11/12/01 37 12 200

19016 2/12/00 68 52 300

19016 2/21/00 19 19 160

19016 1/8/01 65 90 480

19016 2/13/01 15 21 110

19016 11/12/01 45 52 300

19018 1/8/01 70 68 660

19018 2/13/01 38 53 280

19018 11/12/01 42 29 340

19024 2/12/00 33 83 327

19024 2/21/00 19 26 81

19024 1/8/01 56 59 360

19024 2/13/01 41 61 280

19024 11/12/01 32 19 180

19026 1/8/01 32 27 190

19026 2/13/01 17 23 120

19026 11/12/01 170 270 1400

19028 2/12/00 43 76 370

19028 2/21/00 27 35 10

19028 1/8/01 37 29 260

19028 2/13/01 33 59 270

19028 11/12/01 180 170 1900

19035 2/12/00 23 16 100

19035 2/21/00 10 10 54

19035 1/8/01 32 19 160

19035 2/13/01 10 9 55

19035 11/12/01 49 36 290

Page 28: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-27

Table 8. Percent Differences for Water Qualities with Flows Over 2.28 cfs. Subwatershed

Number Date Total Copper Total Lead Total Zinc

% % %

19004 2/17/94 -59% -87% -70%

19004 3/24/94 -78% -95% -85%

19004 4/24/94 -27% -51% -45%

19004 11/10/94 -33% -32% -25%

19004 1/11/95 -68% -88% -80%

19004 2/14/95 -22% -72% -52%

19004 4/16/95 -63% -77% -69%

19004 11/1/95 62% 231% 1534%

19004 12/9/96 -6% 15% 51%

19004 12/6/97 89% 26% 167%

19004 3/14/98 -100% -100% -100%

19004 11/8/98 591% 4097% 660%

19004 1/25/99 741% 513% 381%

19004 3/15/99 161% -52% 3%

19004 2/12/00 49% 195% 147%

19004 2/21/00 37% 2105% 142%

19004 3/5/00 50% 2292% 168%

19004 4/17/00 53% 335% 47%

19004 10/27/00 5% 28% 4%

19004 1/8/01 -54% -62% -44%

19004 2/13/01 215% 106% 154%

19004 11/12/01 -82% -81% -87%

19004 11/29/01 18% 14% 8%

19004 2/17/02 1% 68% -7%

19004 11/8/02 19% 99% 55%

19004 2/11/03 14% 32% -10%

19004 2/25/03 45% 1% -16%

19006 2/12/00 -8% 116% 97%

19006 2/21/00 8% 22% -29%

19006 1/8/01 -40% -61% -63%

19006 2/13/01 255% 119% 193%

19006 11/12/01 -64% -49% -76%

19016 2/12/00 -51% -37% -40%

19016 2/21/00 -10% -14% -42%

19016 1/8/01 -73% -81% -80%

19016 2/13/01 156% 73% 93%

19018 1/8/01 -69% -73% -81%

19018 2/13/01 21% -25% -5%

19018 11/12/01 -63% -53% -73%

19024 2/12/00 20% -54% -32%

19024 2/21/00 12% -23% 49%

19024 1/8/01 -51% -56% -57%

19024 2/13/01 22% -24% 1%

19024 11/12/01 -43% -10% -43%

19026 1/8/01 -23% -14% -26%

Page 29: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-28

Subwatershed

Number Date Total Copper Total Lead Total Zinc

% % %

19026 2/13/01 183% 92% 129%

19026 11/12/01 -91% -95% -94%

19028 2/12/00 41% -21% -10%

19028 2/21/00 5% -24% 1489%

19028 1/8/01 -17% 4% -35%

19028 2/13/01 81% -5% 24%

19028 11/12/01 -91% -91% -96%

19035 2/12/00 -14% 12% 10%

19035 2/21/00 15% 4% 19%

19035 2/13/01 141% 143% 145%

Page 30: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-29

Table 9. Actual Differences for Water Qualities with Flows Over 2.28 cfs. Subwatershed

Number Date Total Copper Total Lead Total Zinc

µg/L µg/L µg/L

19004 2/17/94 -20 -96 -182

19004 3/24/94 -23 -134 -205

19004 4/24/94 -12 -36 -145

19004 11/10/94 -12 -11 -46

19004 1/11/95 -12 -39 -120

19004 2/14/95 -9 -79 -187

19004 4/16/95 -53 -108 -384

19004 11/1/95 28 53 383

19004 12/9/96 -1 2 36

19004 12/6/97 25 11 184

19004 3/14/98 -28 -95 -92

19004 11/8/98 35 41 198

19004 1/25/99 37 36 183

19004 3/15/99 24 -43 6

19004 2/12/00 14 29 141

19004 2/21/00 6 21 71

19004 3/5/00 8 23 84

19004 4/17/00 7 17 38

19004 10/27/00 1 6 7

19004 1/8/01 -31 -43 -113

19004 2/13/01 34 26 170

19004 11/12/01 -80 -76 -645

19004 11/29/01 5 4 13

19004 2/17/02 0 22 -21

19004 11/8/02 5 17 65

19004 2/11/03 5 9 -24

19004 2/25/03 7 0 -25

19006 2/12/00 -5 40 156

19006 2/21/00 2 5 -52

19006 1/8/01 -21 -55 -263

19006 2/13/01 41 35 193

19006 11/12/01 -32 -19 -281

19016 2/12/00 -35 -19 -119

19016 2/21/00 -2 -3 -67

19016 1/8/01 -48 -73 -384

19016 2/13/01 23 15 102

19018 1/8/01 -48 -49 -535

19018 2/13/01 8 -13 -13

19018 11/12/01 -26 -15 -249

19024 2/12/00 7 -45 -106

19024 2/21/00 2 -6 39

19024 1/8/01 -28 -33 -206

19024 2/13/01 9 -14 2

19024 11/12/01 -14 -2 -78

19026 1/8/01 -7 -4 -50

Page 31: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-30

Subwatershed

Number Date Total Copper Total Lead Total Zinc

µg/L µg/L µg/L

19026 2/13/01 31 21 155

19026 11/12/01 -154 -255 -1309

19028 2/12/00 17 -16 -38

19028 2/21/00 1 -8 149

19028 1/8/01 -6 1 -91

19028 2/13/01 27 -3 64

19028 11/12/01 -165 -155 -1815

19035 2/12/00 -3 2 10

19035 2/21/00 1 0 10

19035 2/13/01 14 13 79

Page 32: Appendix F Statistical Comparison of Measured …...Page F-1 Introduction This appendix compares measured flow and water quality values against those generated from model runs. Data

Page F-31

Table 10. Water Quality Statistical Summary of Modeled and Observed Data Sets and

Percent and Actual Differences.

Statistics of

Modeled

Values

(55 values)

Copper -

ug/LLead -ug/L Zinc -ug/L

Statistics of

Modeled

Values that

directly

compared to

Observed

Values

(55 values)

Copper -ug/L Lead -ug/L Zinc -ug/L

Mean 31 31 170 Mean 39 51 270

Median 28 28 157 Median 32 32 180

25th 19 18 100 25th 18 22 100

75th 40 45 317 75th 45 70 320

Statistics of

Percent

Differences

(55 Values)

Copper -% Lead -% Zinc -%

Statistics of

Actual

Differences

(55 Values)

Copper -ug/L Lead -ug/L Zinc -ug/L

Mean 33% 166% 76% Mean -8.1 -20.0 -96.5

Median 5% -14% -10% Median 1.3 -3.1 -23.9

25th -51% -55% -55% 25th -21 -41 -132

75th 47% 71% 74% 75th 8.5 14.1 68.0

Table 11. Calculated Loads for Modeled and Observed Values. Sub

watershed

Number Date Flow Volume

Total

Copper Total Lead Total Zinc Total Copper Total Lead Total Zinc

Modeled Modeled Modeled Observed Observed Observed

Units L g g g g g g

19004 11/29/01 6,852,360 217 219 1197 185 192 1110

19004 2/17/02 18,628,159 992 1003 5452 987 596 5849

19004 11/8/02 7,929,481 264 268 1451 222 135 936

19004 2/11/03 123,077,664 4629 4724 25361 4062 3569 28308

19004 2/25/03 466,572,473 10789 10856 60216 7465 10731 71852

Table 12. Percent and Actual Differences Between Model and Observed Values in Table B-11.

Subwatersh

ed Number Date

Total

Copper Total Lead Total Zinc Total Copper Total Lead Total Zinc

Percent

Difference

Percent

Difference

Percent

Difference

Actual

Difference

Actual

Difference

Actual

Difference

Units % % % g g g

19004 11/29/01 18% 14% 8% 32.48 27 87

19004 2/17/02 0.5% 68% -7% 5.0 407 (397)

19004 11/8/02 19% 99% 55% 42.27 132.8 515

19004 2/11/03 14% 32% -10% 567 1,154 (2,947)

19004 2/25/03 45% 1.2% -16% 3,324 125 (11,636)


Recommended