Nichols Environmental(Canada) Ltd.
nicholsenvironmental.comToll Free: 877 888 6325
Head Office:17331 - 107th Avenue
Edmonton, AlbertaT5S 1E5
P: 780 484 3377F: 780 484 5093
Southern Region:427 Manitou Road SE
Calgary, AlbertaT2G 4C2
P: 403 452 1820F: 403 984 8803
November 9, 2012Nichols Project No. 12-001-SRD
Via e-mail: [email protected] Will Remain on File
Alberta Environment4th Floor Twin Atria4999 - 98 AvenueEdmonton, AlbertaT6B 2X3
ATTN: Mr. Zsolt MargitaiContaminated Sites Coordinator
RE: Proposed Risk Management Plan9915 - 76th AvenueLots 1-11; Block 6; Plan 5429ALEdmonton, Alberta
Dear Mr. Margitai:
Nichols Environmental is pleased to present the following proposed risk managementplan (RMP) for hydrocarbon impacted soil and groundwater, associated with theabove-referenced location (herein after referred to as ‘the Property’). Figure 1(attached) outlines the location of the Property relative to the City of Edmonton. Adetailed site diagram, including existing borehole and monitoring well locations andother relevant site details, is presented in Figure 2.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Property was located in the Ritchie Neighbourhood of Edmonton, Alberta, at LSDW-28-52-24-W4M. According to The City of Edmonton’s Zoning Bylaw #12800, theProperty currently falls under the Medium Industrial Zone (IM) and has a proposedre-zoning to the Industrial Business Zone (IB). A partially developed steel-framebuilding structure with steel-framed roofing and aluminum-clad siding is locatedcentrally along the south boundary of the Property.
The Property was immediately bordered by sidewalks and roadways to the north(76th Avenue) and west (100th Street), a vacant lot to the east, and an alleyway tothe south. A residence was located to the northeast of the Property across 76th
Avenue. Surrounding land uses were mixed industrial and commercial in allremaining directions. The area to the east of the Property, across 99th Street,consisted of a residential neighbourhood. Eight groundwater monitoring wells werepresent along the east and south edges of the Property, and additional groundwatermonitoring wells were observed on the neighbouring properties to the east andsouth. The site and surrounding land uses are summarized in Table 1 (attached).
PHASE I ESA
Historical Review
Due Diligence
PHASE II ESA
Soil & Groundwater
Assessment
Delineation
REMEDIATION
Engineering Design
Installation
Management
Closure Monitoring
GEOMATICS
Spatial Analysis
Data Visualization
Cartography
SPILL RESPONSE
Regulatory Liaison
Investigation
Remediation
GEOSCIENCES
Civil/Municipal
Foundations
Site Development
Top-of-Bank
Slope Stability
Earthworks Design
Tendering
Construction
Supervision
J:\2012\12-001-SRD\Reports\RMP\2012-11-09 Alberta Environment.wpd
APPENDIX II
Alberta EnvironmentProposed Risk Management Plan 9915 - 76th Avenue Lots 1-11; Block 6; Plan 5429AL, Edmonton, AlbertaProject No. 12-001-SRDNovember 9, 2012Page 2 of 6
BACKGROUND
Nichols Environmental recently forwarded to Alberta Environment the following reports whichdocument the history of assessment work and remediation completed on the Property up untilOctober 2012:
� Nichols Environmental (Canada) Ltd., October 29, 2012. Phase I Environmental SiteAssessment, 9915 - 76th Avenue, Lots 1-11; Block 6; Plan 5429AL, Edmonton, Alberta. Prepared for: SuRo Developments (Nichols File No. 12-001-SRD); and
� Nichols Environmental (Canada) Ltd., October 29, 2012. Site Remediation, 9915 - 76thAvenue, Lots 1-11; Block 6; Plan 5429AL, Edmonton, Alberta. Prepared for: SuRoDevelopments (Nichols File No. 12-001-SRD).
ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES
The analytical results for the Property are presented and discussed in context of AlbertaEnvironment and Sustainable Resource Development's Tier 1 and 2 Soil and GroundwaterRemediation Guidelines, as amended up to December 2010 (2010 Alberta Guidelines).
Under these guidelines, three management options are provided: Tier 1, Tier 2, and ExposureControl. Tier 1 guidelines are considered applicable for the majority of the sites in Alberta and aresomewhat conservative as they have been developed for protection of the more sensitive landuses. Tier 2 guidelines allow for consideration of site-specific conditions through the modificationof Tier 1 guidelines and/or by removing exposure pathways that may not be applicable to the site. The Tier 2 approach still provides the same level of protection to human and ecological receptorpathways as the Tier 1 approach, but must be done through the collection of more site-specificdata. Exposure Control involves risk management through exposure barriers or administrativecontrols based on a site-specific risk management approach.
The above remediation criteria may be used as benchmarks to evaluate the need for furtherinvestigation, remediation or to guide in the establishment of land-use restrictions.
Surface soil guidelines for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX) and petroleumhydrocarbon (PHC) Fractions 1 through 4 must be applied to a depth of 3.0 metres below grade(mbg). Subsoil guidelines for BTEX and PHC Fractions 1 through 4 must be applied to a minimumdepth of 3.1 mbg.
Land Use Assessment
The Property was initially developed some time between 1924 and 1950, according to the aerialphotograph review as summarized in the Phase I ESA report. The earliest available aerialphotograph from 1924 shows a CP Rail Yard to the west of the Property and residential housingto the east. Surrounding land uses were mixed industrial and commercial in all remainingdirections. Residential land use was located northeast and east of the Property, across 99th Street,
J:\2012\12-001-SRD\Reports\RMP\2012-11-09 Alberta Environment.wpd
Alberta EnvironmentProposed Risk Management Plan 9915 - 76th Avenue Lots 1-11; Block 6; Plan 5429AL, Edmonton, AlbertaProject No. 12-001-SRDNovember 9, 2012Page 3 of 6
but greater than 30 m from the easternmost Property line. The surrounding land use issummarized in Table 1 (attached).
Grain-size analyses were conducted on soil samples from the Property as part of the Phase II ESAcompleted in September 2011 for The City of Edmonton. Two soil samples, one from boreholeM11-05 at a depth of 9.0 mbg and one from borehole M11-07 at a depth of 7.5 mbg, were bothreported to be fine grained.
Hydraulic conductivity testing was also carried out as part of the Phase II ESA, previouslycompleted in September 2011 for The City of Edmonton and as summarized in the October 2012Site Remediation report. A total of five monitoring wells, from both the Property and surroundingarea, were tested for hydraulic conductivity. The results indicated that each of these monitoringwells had a hydraulic conductivity greater than 1 x 10-7 m/s, and as such, the domestic use aquifer(DUA) exposure pathway cannot be excluded for the Property.
As such, the Property was assessed using the Alberta Tier 1 Soil and Groundwater RemediationGuidelines for industrial land use and fine-grained soils. A summary of the guideline criteria andland use assessment is provided in Table 2.
RISK MANAGEMENT CONDITIONS
Alberta Environment has conditions that must be met in order to implement a risk managementplan (RMP). The conditions are as follows:
1. The source of contamination must be removed;
2. The extent of impact must be defined in both soil and groundwater;
3. A monitoring program must be put into place;
4. There must be a commitment from the owner to undertake this plan; and
5. Any required administrative controls must be established to protect the public frompotential exposure to the contamination.
The Property meets the above criteria as follows:
1. AGRA Earth and Environmental Limited (AGRA) removed a 1,890-litre steel undergroundstorage tank (UST), used to contain gasoline, from Lot 9 of the Property in October of1995. The approximate location of the former UST is presented on Figure 2. HagstromGeotechnical Services Ltd. (Hagstrom) completed a site remediation for the Property asreported in January of 2009. The site remediation consisted of the removal ofapproximately 2.0 m of uncontaminated overburden, followed by removal of contaminatedsoils from approximately 2.0 m to 4.5 - 4.6 mbg, for a total volume of 1,850 m3 of impactedsoils being removed. Further excavation at depth was not completed as a saturated sandlayer was encountered that was unstable (excessive sloughing). Closure soil samples
J:\2012\12-001-SRD\Reports\RMP\2012-11-09 Alberta Environment.wpd
Alberta EnvironmentProposed Risk Management Plan 9915 - 76th Avenue Lots 1-11; Block 6; Plan 5429AL, Edmonton, AlbertaProject No. 12-001-SRDNovember 9, 2012Page 4 of 6
indicated that petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were below the applicable guidelineson the west and north walls of the excavation. However, closure soil samples, collectedfrom the east and south walls of the excavation, had petroleum hydrocarbon concentrationsabove the applicable guidelines. A petroleum hydrocarbon-resistant liner was installedalong the south and east Property lines, as shown on Figure 2, to prevent recontaminationof the remediated area on the Property. Closure base samples from the saturated sandwere not collected during the excavation.
Nichols Environmental completed a Phase II ESA for the Property in September of 2011which identified the presence of residual soil and groundwater petroleum hydrocarboncontamination on the Property, within the saturated sand layer at depths ranging from 4.5to 9.0 mbg.
Nichols Environmental then completed an in-situ remediation program for the Property in2012, which involved the injection of sodium persulphate (oxidant) into the saturated sandlayer to oxidize the residual petroleum hydrocarbons. Delineation of the western andnorthern extent of the soil and groundwater hydrocarbon plumes on the Property was alsocompleted as part of this program. The results of the in-situ remediation program indicateda reduction in dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbons by approximately 75% across theProperty. The remaining petroleum hydrocarbon impacts in the groundwater were nowisolated to the far southeast corner of the Property, outside of the building footprint.
Based on these previous assessments and remediation work completed on the Property,Nichols Environmental concludes that the original source of contamination has beenremoved and remaining petroleum hydrocarbon impacts have been largely remediated onthe Property.
2. Based on the analytical data, it is the opinion of Nichols Environmental that the extent ofsoil petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations, exceeding the 2010 Guidelines, has beendelineated as outlined in Figure 3. Furthermore, it is the opinion of Nichols Environmentalthat the extent of groundwater petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations, exceeding the 2010Guidelines, has been delineated as outlined in Figure 4. The petroleum hydrocarbonanalytical data for the Property is provided in Tables 3 (soil) and 4 (groundwater) andgroundwater monitoring data for the Property is provided in Table 5.
3. An annual soil and groundwater monitoring and sampling program has been proposed tomonitor soil and groundwater impacts associated with the Property over time, and theproposed scope of work is outlined below:• Complete three boreholes on the southeast corner of the Property and collect soil
samples for laboratory analyses of BTEX, PHC Fractions 1 through 4, metals anddetailed salinity;
• Install two soil vapour probes beneath the concrete slab-on-grade floor, within thesoutheast corner of the building, to monitor potential vapour migration through theunsaturated zone;
• Collect two soil vapour samples from the probes for laboratory analyses of BTEXand total hydrocarbons;
J:\2012\12-001-SRD\Reports\RMP\2012-11-09 Alberta Environment.wpd
Alberta EnvironmentProposed Risk Management Plan 9915 - 76th Avenue Lots 1-11; Block 6; Plan 5429AL, Edmonton, AlbertaProject No. 12-001-SRDNovember 9, 2012Page 5 of 6
• Mobilize to the site to monitor the groundwater wells once per year (during frostfree periods). All wells would be monitored for water level, hydrocarbon vapourconcentrations in the well headspace and for the presence or absence of free-phasehydrocarbon product;
• A maximum of eight groundwater samples would be collected and submitted forBTEX and PHC Fractions 1 and 2 analyses during the monitoring event. Monitoringwells M11-01, M11-04, M11-05, M11-16, M11-17, M12-09, M12-18 and M12-19would be included in the sampling event; and
• An update report, documenting the sampling event, would be prepared andsubmitted to the Property owner and Alberta Environment on an annual basis.
The soil and groundwater monitoring program will continue until the hydrocarbonconcentrations are reduced to a level that is deemed sufficiently low that human health isno longer at risk. If soil analytical results, collected during the initial sampling event,indicate that all petroleum hydrocarbon, metals and salinity parameters are within theapplicable guidelines, future soil sampling events will not be completed. The success of therisk management plan will depend on the future diligence of those managing the site.
A soil management plan will also be put into place to manage any future grounddisturbance of contaminated soils. If during any future construction on the Property,contaminated soils are encountered, the following management plan shall be adhered to:
• Contaminated soils will be segregated and stockpiled on an onsite poly liner;• Samples of the contaminated soils will be collected for characterization and
potential landfill disposal;• Soils will not be moved offsite until such time that laboratory analyses are received
and contaminated soils have been characterized;• Once characterized, if soils are deemed contaminated, they will be hauled offsite
and disposed of at an approved landfill facility; and• All workers must review MSDS sheets for hydrocarbon impacted soils and use the
proper personal protective equipment (chemical resistant gloves, Nomex coveralls,chemical resistant boots, and potentially NIOSH air filter half-masks) prior toexcavating contaminated soils.
4. The proposed RMP was forwarded to the Property owner (SuRo Developments) forapproval, a copy of their agreement is attached.
5. A hydrocarbon resistant liner has been installed on the south and east Property lines toprevent the back-migration of contaminants from offsite areas further south and east, asper Figure 2. It is the opinion of Nichols Environmental that additional administrativecontrols for the Property are not required at this time.
At the present time, Nichols Environmental is requesting that Alberta Environment review theinformation collected to date and the proposed RMP for the onsite hydrocarbon impacts, andprovide any comments. If Alberta Environment is in agreement with the proposed RMP, we wouldrequest a letter stating that it supports this course of action.
J:\2012\12-001-SRD\Reports\RMP\2012-11-09 Alberta Environment.wpd
Alberta EnvironmentProposed Risk Management Plan 9915 - 76th Avenue Lots 1-11; Block 6; Plan 5429AL, Edmonton, AlbertaProject No. 12-001-SRDNovember 9, 2012Page 6 of 6
CLOSURE
We trust that this letter meets with your current requirements. If you should have any questionsplease do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (780) 484-3377.
Yours truly,NICHOLS ENVIRONMENTAL (CANADA) LTD.
Barry Rakewich, P.Ag., EPSenior Project Manager
Reviewed by:
R.W. (Rob) Dickie, P.Geol., R.E.T., EPPresident
BR/RWD/sld
Attachments
cc: Rob Fediuk, SuRo Developments (via email: [email protected])
J:\2012\12-001-SRD\Reports\RMP\2012-11-09 Alberta Environment.wpd
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Aut
oIm
ports
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
75th
Ave
nue
NW
Alle
y
76th
Ave
nue
NW
Quonset
99thStreet NW
100thStreet NW
CP
Rai
l
77th
Ave
nue
NW
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Aut
oIm
ports
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
75th
Ave
nue
NW
Alle
y
76th
Ave
nue
NW
Quonset
99thStreet NW
100thStreet NW
CP
Rai
l
77th
Ave
nue
NW
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Aut
oIm
ports
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
75th
Ave
nue
NW
Alle
y
76th
Ave
nue
NW
Quonset
99thStreet NW
100thStreet NW
CP
Rai
l
77th
Ave
nue
NW
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Aut
oIm
ports
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
75th
Ave
nue
NW
Alle
y
76th
Ave
nue
NW
Quonset
99thStreet NW
100thStreet NW
CP
Rai
l
77th
Ave
nue
NW
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Aut
oIm
ports
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
75th
Ave
nue
NW
Alle
y
76th
Ave
nue
NW
Quonset
99thStreet NW
100thStreet NW
CP
Rai
l
77th
Ave
nue
NW
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Aut
oIm
ports
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
75th
Ave
nue
NW
Alle
y
76th
Ave
nue
NW
Quonset
99thStreet NW
100thStreet NW
CP
Rai
l
77th
Ave
nue
NW
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Aut
oIm
ports
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
75th
Ave
nue
NW
Alle
y
76th
Ave
nue
NW
Quonset
99thStreet NW
100thStreet NW
CP
Rai
l
77th
Ave
nue
NW
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Aut
oIm
ports
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
75th
Ave
nue
NW
Alle
y
76th
Ave
nue
NW
Quonset
99thStreet NW
100thStreet NW
CP
Rai
l
77th
Ave
nue
NW
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Aut
oIm
ports
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
75th
Ave
nue
NW
Alle
y
76th
Ave
nue
NW
Quonset
99thStreet NW
100thStreet NW
CP
Rai
l
77th
Ave
nue
NW
Lege
nd:
Ref
eren
ce im
age
scal
e 1:
13,1
00
Site
Loc
atio
n
Nic
hols
Env
ironm
enta
l (C
anad
a) L
td.
Figu
re 1
1:1,
600N
ovem
ber 2
012
12-0
01-S
RD
Pro
pose
d R
isk
Man
agem
ent P
lan
Lots
1-1
1; B
lock
6; P
lan
5429
AL
9915
- 76
th A
venu
e N
WE
dmon
ton,
Alb
erta BR
/LL
2011
Air
Pho
to S
ourc
e: G
oogl
e E
arth
App
roxi
mat
e P
rope
rtyB
ound
ary
NIC
HO
LS E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TAL
(CA
NA
DA
) LTD
.
SuR
o D
evel
opm
ents
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Aut
oIm
ports
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
75th
Ave
nue
NW
Alle
y
76th
Ave
nue
NW
Quonset
99thStreet NW
100thStreet NW
CP
Rai
l
77th
Ave
nue
NW
Java
Jiv
eC
offe
eFa
ctor
y
Java
Jiv
eC
offe
eFa
ctor
y
Java
Jiv
eC
offe
eFa
ctor
y
Java
Jiv
eC
offe
eFa
ctor
y
Java
Jiv
eC
offe
eFa
ctor
y
Java
Jiv
eC
offe
eFa
ctor
y
Java
Jiv
eC
offe
eFa
ctor
y
Java
Jiv
eC
offe
eFa
ctor
y
Java
Jiv
eC
offe
eFa
ctor
y
Java
Jiv
eC
offe
eFa
ctor
yD
oug'
s P
lace
Col
lisio
nD
oug'
s P
lace
Col
lisio
nD
oug'
s P
lace
Col
lisio
nD
oug'
s P
lace
Col
lisio
nD
oug'
s P
lace
Col
lisio
nD
oug'
s P
lace
Col
lisio
nD
oug'
s P
lace
Col
lisio
nD
oug'
s P
lace
Col
lisio
nD
oug'
s P
lace
Col
lisio
nD
oug'
s P
lace
Col
lisio
n
Pla
izie
r'sA
uto
Ser
vice
Pla
izie
r'sA
uto
Ser
vice
Pla
izie
r'sA
uto
Ser
vice
Pla
izie
r'sA
uto
Ser
vice
Pla
izie
r'sA
uto
Ser
vice
Pla
izie
r'sA
uto
Ser
vice
Pla
izie
r'sA
uto
Ser
vice
Pla
izie
r'sA
uto
Ser
vice
Pla
izie
r'sA
uto
Ser
vice
Pla
izie
r'sA
uto
Ser
vice S
corp
ion
Aut
o C
linic
Ltd.
Sco
rpio
nA
uto
Clin
icLt
d.
Sco
rpio
nA
uto
Clin
icLt
d.
Sco
rpio
nA
uto
Clin
icLt
d.
Sco
rpio
nA
uto
Clin
icLt
d.
Sco
rpio
nA
uto
Clin
icLt
d.
Sco
rpio
nA
uto
Clin
icLt
d.
Sco
rpio
nA
uto
Clin
icLt
d.
Sco
rpio
nA
uto
Clin
icLt
d.
Sco
rpio
nA
uto
Clin
icLt
d.
A1
Tire
&B
atte
ry L
td.
A1
Tire
&B
atte
ry L
td.
A1
Tire
&B
atte
ry L
td.
A1
Tire
&B
atte
ry L
td.
A1
Tire
&B
atte
ry L
td.
A1
Tire
&B
atte
ry L
td.
A1
Tire
&B
atte
ry L
td.
A1
Tire
&B
atte
ry L
td.
A1
Tire
&B
atte
ry L
td.
A1
Tire
&B
atte
ry L
td.
Aut
o R
escu
eA
uto
Res
cue
Aut
o R
escu
eA
uto
Res
cue
Aut
o R
escu
eA
uto
Res
cue
Aut
o R
escu
eA
uto
Res
cue
Aut
o R
escu
eA
uto
Res
cue
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial
Res
iden
tial
Res
iden
tial
Res
iden
tial
Res
iden
tial
Res
iden
tial
Res
iden
tial
Res
iden
tial
Res
iden
tial
Res
iden
tial
Vac
ant L
otV
acan
t Lot
Vac
ant L
otV
acan
t Lot
Vac
ant L
otV
acan
t Lot
Vac
ant L
otV
acan
t Lot
Vac
ant L
otV
acan
t Lot
Vacant Lot Vacant Lot Vacant Lot Vacant Lot Vacant Lot Vacant Lot Vacant Lot Vacant Lot Vacant Lot Vacant Lot
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Res
iden
tial L
and
Use
Ces
sco
Fabr
icat
ion
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ces
sco
Fabr
icat
ion
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ces
sco
Fabr
icat
ion
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ces
sco
Fabr
icat
ion
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ces
sco
Fabr
icat
ion
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ces
sco
Fabr
icat
ion
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ces
sco
Fabr
icat
ion
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ces
sco
Fabr
icat
ion
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ces
sco
Fabr
icat
ion
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ces
sco
Fabr
icat
ion
and
Eng
inee
ring
Vac
ant C
omm
erci
alLa
nd U
seV
acan
t Com
mer
cial
Land
Use
Vac
ant C
omm
erci
alLa
nd U
seV
acan
t Com
mer
cial
Land
Use
Vac
ant C
omm
erci
alLa
nd U
seV
acan
t Com
mer
cial
Land
Use
Vac
ant C
omm
erci
alLa
nd U
seV
acan
t Com
mer
cial
Land
Use
Vac
ant C
omm
erci
alLa
nd U
seV
acan
t Com
mer
cial
Land
Use
Ces
sco
Fiel
dS
ervi
ces
Ces
sco
Fiel
dS
ervi
ces
Ces
sco
Fiel
dS
ervi
ces
Ces
sco
Fiel
dS
ervi
ces
Ces
sco
Fiel
dS
ervi
ces
Ces
sco
Fiel
dS
ervi
ces
Ces
sco
Fiel
dS
ervi
ces
Ces
sco
Fiel
dS
ervi
ces
Ces
sco
Fiel
dS
ervi
ces
Ces
sco
Fiel
dS
ervi
ces
Aut
o Im
ports
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Min
e C
able
Ser
vice
s
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
100th Street NW
Alle
y
99th Street NW
Quonset
Res
iden
tial
M11
-16
M12
-18
M12
-20
M11
- 17
M12
-19
MW
12- 0
9
M11
- 01
M11
- 04
M11
- 05
Form
er G
asol
ine
US
T
Site
Det
ail a
ndM
onito
ring
Wel
l Loc
atio
ns
1:60
0B
R/L
L
Nic
hols
Env
ironm
enta
l (C
anad
a) L
td.
Nov
embe
r 201
2
Lege
nd:
NIC
HO
LS E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TAL
(CA
NA
DA
) LTD
.
12-0
01-S
RD
SuR
o D
evel
opm
ents
Figu
re 2
Mon
itorin
g W
ell
M11
-01
Mon
itorin
g W
ell
M25
-10
Pow
er P
ole
PP
Tree
s
Bui
ldin
g
Asp
halt
Gra
vel R
oad
Con
cret
e S
lab
Veg
etat
ion
Gas
Lin
e
Roa
d C
ente
rline
App
roxi
mat
e P
rope
rty B
ound
ary
Pro
pose
d R
isk
Man
agem
ent P
lan
Lots
1-1
1; B
lock
6; P
lan
5429
AL
9915
- 76
th A
venu
e N
WE
dmon
ton,
Alb
erta
30 m
il H
ydro
carb
on R
esis
tant
Line
r (1.
5 to
4.5
mbg
)
Aut
o Im
ports
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Min
e C
able
Ser
vice
s
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
100th Street NW
Alle
y
99th Street NW
Quonset
Res
iden
tial
M11
-16
M12
-18
M12
-20
M11
- 17
M12
-19
MW
12- 0
9
M11
- 01
M11
- 04
M11
- 05
Form
er G
asol
ine
US
T
Est
imat
ed E
xten
t of S
oil
Pet
role
um H
ydro
carb
on P
lum
e
1:60
0B
R/L
L
Nic
hols
Env
ironm
enta
l (C
anad
a) L
td.
Nov
embe
r 201
2
Lege
nd:
NIC
HO
LS E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TAL
(CA
NA
DA
) LTD
.
12-0
01-S
RD
SuR
o D
evel
opm
ents
Figu
re 3
Mon
itorin
g W
ell
M11
-01
Mon
itorin
g W
ell
M25
-10
Pow
er P
ole
PP
Tree
s
Bui
ldin
g
Asp
halt
Gra
vel R
oad
Con
cret
e S
lab
Veg
etat
ion
Gas
Lin
e
Roa
d C
ente
rline
App
roxi
mat
e P
rope
rty B
ound
ary
Pro
pose
d R
isk
Man
agem
ent P
lan
Lots
1-1
1; B
lock
6; P
lan
5429
AL
9915
- 76
th A
venu
e N
WE
dmon
ton,
Alb
erta
Exce
eds
Gui
delin
e
Est
imat
ed E
xten
t of S
oil P
etro
leum
Hyd
roca
rbon
Plu
me
Aut
o Im
ports
TWS
Eng
inee
ring
Min
e C
able
Ser
vice
s
Ban
nerz
Can
ada
100th Street NW
Alle
y
99th Street NW
Quonset
Res
iden
tial
M11
-16
M12
-18
M12
-20
M11
- 17
M12
-19
MW
12- 0
9
M11
- 01
M11
- 04
M11
- 05
Form
er G
asol
ine
US
T
Est
imat
ed E
xten
t of D
isso
lved
Pet
role
um H
ydro
carb
on P
lum
e(O
ctob
er 2
012)
1:60
0B
R/L
L
Nic
hols
Env
ironm
enta
l (C
anad
a) L
td.
Nov
embe
r 201
2
Lege
nd:
NIC
HO
LS E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TAL
(CA
NA
DA
) LTD
.
12-0
01-S
RD
SuR
o D
evel
opm
ents
Figu
re 4
Mon
itorin
g W
ell
M11
-01
Mon
itorin
g W
ell
M25
-10
Pow
er P
ole
PP
Tree
s
Bui
ldin
g
Asp
halt
Gra
vel R
oad
Con
cret
e S
lab
Veg
etat
ion
Gas
Lin
e
Roa
d C
ente
rline
App
roxi
mat
e P
rope
rty B
ound
ary
Pro
pose
d R
isk
Man
agem
ent P
lan
Lots
1-1
1; B
lock
6; P
lan
5429
AL
9915
- 76
th A
venu
e N
WE
dmon
ton,
Alb
erta
Exce
eds
Gui
delin
e
Est
imat
ed E
xten
t of D
isso
lved
Pet
role
um H
ydro
carb
on P
lum
e
Nichols Environmental (Canada) Ltd.
TABLE: 1
TITLE: SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USE
PROJECT#: 12-001-SRDCLIENT: SuRo DevelopmentsPROJECT: Risk Management PlanSITE: Lots 1 - 11; Block 6; Plan 5429ALLOCATION: Edmonton, Alberta
Direction Land Use* Land Use TypeDistance from Property (m)
Property Medium Industrial Zone (IM) Industrial 0
North 76 Avenue followed by IM Industrial 15
EastVacant Lot followed by from west to east IM, 99 Street, Neighborhood Convenience Commericial Zone (CNC), Residential Low Density Development (RF3)
Commercial 0
South IM and Industrial Business Zone (IB) Residential 0
West 100 Street follwed by Heavy Industrial Zone (IH) Commercial 15
* City of Edmonton Land Use Zoning Bylaw #12800
J:\2012\12-001-SRD\Reports\RMP\2012-11-01 RMP tables 11/9/2012
Nichols Environmental (Canada) Ltd.
TABLE: 2
TITLE: CRITERIA SUMMARY/LAND USE ASSESSMENT
PROJECT#: 12-001-SRDCLIENT: SuRo DevelopmentsPROJECT: Risk Management PlanSITE: Lots 1 - 11; Block 6; Plan 5429ALLOCATION: Edmonton, Alberta
LAND USE GRAIN SIZE TIER REASONING
Industrial Fine 1Cannot rule out DUA due to high hydraulic conductivity of upper water table
LAND USE GRAIN SIZE TIER REASONING
Industrial Fine 1Cannot rule out DUA due to high hydraulic conductivity of upper water table
Soil
Groundwater
J:\2012\12-001-SRD\Reports\RMP\2012-11-01 RMP tables 11/9/2012
Nic
hols
Env
ironm
enta
l (C
anad
a) L
td.
TAB
LE:
3
TITL
E:SO
IL A
NA
LYSE
S -
PET
RO
LEU
M H
YD
RO
CA
RB
ON
S
PRO
JECT
#:
12-0
01-S
RD
CLIE
NT:
SuRo
Dev
elop
men
tsPR
OJE
CT:
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t Pl
anSI
TE:
Lots
1 -
11;
Blo
ck 6
; Pl
an 5
429A
LLO
CATI
ON
:Ed
mon
ton,
Alb
erta
Ben
zen
eTo
luen
eEt
hyl
ben
zen
eX
ylen
esFr
acti
on 1
Frac
tion
2Fr
acti
on 3
Frac
tion
40.
046
0.52
0.11
1542
030
02,
600
10,0
000.
046
0.52
0.11
1542
030
02,
600
10,0
000.
046
0.52
0.11
1542
030
02,
600
10,0
000.
046
0.52
0.11
1564
052
03,
500
10,0
000
.04
60
.52
0.1
11
56
40
52
03
,50
01
0,0
00
Ben
zen
eTo
luen
eEt
hyl
ben
zen
eX
ylen
esFr
acti
on 1
Frac
tion
2Fr
acti
on 3
Frac
tion
4La
nd
Use
0.0
46
0.5
20
.11
15
64
05
20
3,5
00
10
,00
0Sa
mpl
e ID
Dep
th (
m)
Dat
eO
VC
/HV
CM
11-0
16.
114
-Sep
-11
490
0.0
58
<0.
021
.9<
0.03
82<
50<
50<
100
M11
-04
5.3
14-S
ep-1
134
70
.11
4<
0.02
0.08
<0.
03<
10<
50<
50<
100
M11
-04
6.9
14-S
ep-1
138
.90.
014
<0.
02<
0.01
<0.
03<
10<
50<
50<
100
M11
-05
6.9
14-S
ep-1
139
10
.57
3<
0.02
0.2
20.
23<
10<
50<
50<
100
M11
-05
9.0
14-S
ep-1
135
.70
.06
20.
10.
020.
06<
10<
50<
50<
100
M11
-16
6.1
16-S
ep-1
18.
8<
0.00
5<
0.02
<0.
01<
0.03
<10
<50
<50
<10
0M
11-1
75.
316
-Sep
-11
27.4
<0.
005
<0.
020.
050.
0413
<50
<50
<10
0M
W12
-09
6.0
25-A
pr-0
9N
M<
0.00
1<
0.01
<0.
01<
0.02
<5
<20
<20
<20
M12
-18
6.8
23-J
an-1
227
0^<
0.00
5<
0.02
<0.
01<
0.03
<10
<50
<10
0<
100
M12
-19
6.0
23-J
an-1
222
0^<
0.00
5<
0.02
<0.
01<
0.03
<10
<50
73<
100
M12
-20
6.0
23-J
an-1
217
0^<
0.00
5<
0.02
<0.
01<
0.03
<10
<50
<10
0<
100
BO
LD=
App
licab
le G
uide
line
Crite
riaB
OLD
= P
aram
eter
Exc
eeds
Rec
omm
ende
d G
uide
line
Crite
ria
*Alb
erta
Env
ironm
ent.
Alb
erta
Tie
r 1
Soil
and
Gro
undw
ater
Rem
edia
tion
Gui
delin
es (
Tabl
e 3)
. D
ecem
ber
2010
. **
CCM
E: C
anad
ian
Coun
cil o
f M
inis
ters
of
the
Envi
ronm
ent
(CCM
E) 1
999
Cana
dian
Env
ironm
enta
l Qua
lity
Gui
delin
es (
as a
men
ded
to U
pdat
e 7.
0)
^ H
ydro
carb
on V
apou
r Co
ncen
trat
ion
(All
conc
entr
atio
ns in
mg/
kg =
ppm
, unl
ess
note
d) 8.0%
M11
-05
@ 9
.0 m
(fin
e-gr
aine
d)47
.3%
M11
-07
@ 7
.5 m
(fin
e-gr
aine
d)
Frac
tion
1=
C6
to C
10(-
BTEX
)Fr
actio
n 3
= >
C16
to
C 34
Frac
tion
2=
> C
10 t
o C 1
6Fr
actio
n 4
= C
35+
OVC
= O
rgan
ic V
apou
r Co
ncen
trat
ion
(ppm
v)N
D=
Non
-det
ect
(eith
er <
5 p
pmv
HVC
or
<0.
1 pp
mv
OVC
)--
-=
No
valu
e pr
ovid
ed in
gui
delin
es
2010
Alb
erta
Fin
e G
rain
edN
atur
al A
rea
Res
iden
tial /
Par
klan
d
Gra
in s
ize
MU
ST P
SA D
50 >
75
um
Subs
oil
Indu
stri
al
Indu
stri
al
Tier
1*
Agric
ultu
ral
Subs
oil
Com
mer
cial
Gra
in s
ize
MU
ST P
SA D
50 >
75
um
J:\2
012\
12-0
01-S
RD
\Rep
orts
\RM
P\2
012-
11-0
1 R
MP
tabl
es11
/9/2
012
Nic
hols
Env
ironm
enta
l (C
anad
a) L
td.
TAB
LE:
4
TITL
E:G
RO
UN
DW
ATE
R A
NA
LYSE
S -
PET
RO
LEU
M H
YD
RO
CA
RB
ON
S
PRO
JECT
#:
12-0
01-S
RD
CLIE
NT:
SuR
o D
evel
opm
ents
PRO
JECT
:R
emed
ial A
ctio
n Pl
anSI
TE:
Lots
1 -
11;
Blo
ck 6
; Pl
an 5
429A
LLO
CATI
ON
:Ed
mon
ton,
Alb
erta
Ben
zene
Tolu
ene
Ethy
lben
zene
Xyl
enes
Frac
tion
1Fr
acti
on 2
Frac
tion
3Fr
acti
on 3
+0.
005
0.02
40.
0024
0.3
2.2
1.1
--
0.00
50.
024
0.00
240.
30.
811.
1--
--0.
005
0.02
40.
0024
0.3
0.81
1.1
---
---
0.00
50.
024
0.00
240.
32.
21.
1--
----
--0.
005
0.02
40.
0024
0.3
2.2
1.1
----
---
---
Ben
zene
Tolu
ene
Ethy
lben
zene
Xyl
enes
Frac
tion
1Fr
acti
on 2
Frac
tion
3Fr
acti
on 3
+La
nd
Use
0.00
50.
024
0.00
240
.32
.21
.1--
---
----
-
Sam
ple
IDD
ate
OV
C
22-S
e p-1
185
00.
031
0.00
030.
139
0.01
64
.50.
6<
0.1
<0.
124
-Jan
-12
NM
0.05
5<
0.00
10.
063
0.00
21
7.9
1.3
0.4
10-A
pr-1
2N
M0.
082
<0.
001
0.00
40.
002
0.8
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
191
.72%
10-A
u g-1
2N
D0.
008
<0.
001
0.00
90.
001
<0.
2<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
99.8
3%5-
Oct
-12
ND
0.01
9<
0.00
10.
002
<0.
001
<0.
2<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
99.8
0%22
-Se p
-11
28.4
1.02
0.01
0.13
10.
009
2.5
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
124
-Jan
-12
NM
1.31
0.01
0.05
30.
004
0.4
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
110
-Apr
-12
331.
380.
010.
102
0.00
50.
7<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
40.1
4%26
-Apr
-12
NM
0.25
50.
002
0.00
50.
001
0.2
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
187
.38%
10-A
u g-1
231
6.1
0.24
40.
001
0.01
1<
0.00
1<
0.2
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
193
.02%
5-O
ct-1
22.
41.
360.
006
0.08
50.
003
1.2
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
127
.68%
22-S
e p-1
154
60.
315
0.02
50.
256
0.57
82
.61
<0.
1<
0.1
24-J
an-1
2N
M2.
060.
040.
233
0.17
94
1.1
0.1
<0.
110
-Apr
-12
68.3
0.32
50.
004
0.01
60.
021
4.7
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
134
.31%
26-A
pr-1
2N
M0.
147
0.00
40.
006
0.00
90.
5<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
91.3
6%10
-Au g
-12
119.
11.
690.
024
0.14
10.
191
1.5
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
154
.02%
5-O
ct-1
226
5.0
0.67
50.
021
0.01
00.
012
1.7
0.3
<0.
1<
0.1
64.7
6%22
-Sep
-11
50<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.2
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
15-
Oct
-12
ND
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
2<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
22-S
e p-1
133
50.
01<
0.00
10.
004
0.00
30.
3<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
24-J
an-1
2N
M<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.2
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
110
-Apr
-12
0.6
0.00
2<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.2
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
199
.37%
10-A
u g-1
2N
D<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.2
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
110
0.00
%5-
Oct
-12
ND
<0.
001
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.01
<0.
2<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
99.6
8%22
-Se p
-12
ND
0.01
30.
002
0.00
10.
004
<0.
2<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
10-A
u g-1
2N
D<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.2
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
110
0.00
%5-
Oct
-12
ND
0.00
50.
001
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
2<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
70.0
0%24
-Jan
-12
NM
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
001
0.00
2<
0.2
0.2
0.1
<0.
110
-Apr
-12
0.5
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
2<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
5-O
ct-1
2N
D0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
2<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
24-J
an-1
2N
M<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.2
0.2
0.2
<0.
110
-Apr
-12
0.5
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
001
<0.
2<
0.1
<0.
1<
0.1
5-O
ct-1
2N
D0.
001
0.00
2<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.2
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
124
-Jan
-12
NM
<0.
001
0.00
2<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.2
<0.
10.
2<
0.1
10-A
pr-1
212
.5<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.00
1<
0.2
<0.
1<
0.1
<0.
1
BO
LD=
App
licab
le G
uide
line
Crite
riaB
OLD
= P
aram
eter
Exc
eeds
Rec
omm
ende
d G
uide
line
Crite
ria
*Alb
erta
Env
ironm
ent.
Alb
erta
Tie
r 1
Soil
and
Gro
undw
ater
Rem
edia
tion
Gui
delin
es (
Tabl
e 2)
. D
ecem
ber
2010
. (A
ll co
ncen
trat
ions
in m
g/L
= p
pm, u
nles
s no
ted)
8.0%
M11
-05
@ 9
.0 m
(fin
e-gr
aine
d)
47.3
%M
11-0
7 @
7.5
m(f
ine-
grai
ned)
Frac
tion
1=
C6
to C
10(-
BTEX
)
Frac
tion
2=
> C
10 t
o C 1
6
OVC
= O
rgan
ic V
apou
r Co
ncen
trat
ion
(ppm
v)
ND
= N
on-d
etec
t (e
ither
< 5
ppm
v H
VC o
r <
0.1
ppm
v O
VC)
---
= N
o va
lue
prov
ided
in g
uide
lines
M11
-01
M12
-09
M12
-18
M12
-19
M12
-20
M11
-04
M11
-05
Gra
in s
ize
MU
ST P
SA D
50 >
75
um
% R
edu
cton
Gra
in s
ize
MU
ST P
SA D
50 >
75
um
Indu
stri
al
2010
Alb
erta
Fine
Gra
ined
Nat
ural
Are
aAg
ricul
tura
l
M11
-17
M11
-16
Tier
1*
Res
iden
tial /
Par
klan
dCo
mm
erci
alIn
dust
rial
J:\2
012\
12-0
01-S
RD
\Rep
orts
\RM
P\20
12-1
1-01
RM
P ta
bles
11/9
/201
2
Nic
hols
Env
ironm
enta
l (C
anad
a) L
td.
TAB
LE:
5
TITL
E:G
RO
UN
DW
ATE
R M
ON
ITO
RIN
G D
ATA
PRO
JECT
#:
12-0
01-S
RDCL
IEN
T:Su
Ro
Dev
elop
men
tsPR
OJE
CT:
Risk
Man
agem
ent
Plan
SITE
:Lo
ts 1
- 1
1; B
lock
6;
Plan
542
9AL
LOCA
TIO
N:
Edm
onto
n, A
lber
ta
20-S
ep-1
11.
620
668.
6985
0N
D24
-Jan
-12
3.74
066
6.57
NM
ND
3-Ap
r-12
NM
ND
10-A
pr-1
24.
450
665.
86N
MN
D10
-Aug
-12
2.83
066
7.48
ND
ND
5-O
ct-1
24.
240
666.
07N
DN
D20
-Se p
-11
4.04
566
5.81
28.4
ND
24-J
an-1
24.
160
665.
69N
MN
D3-
Apr-
124.
120
665.
7333
.0N
D10
-Apr
-12
4.70
066
5.15
NM
ND
10-A
ug-1
24.
590
665.
2631
6.1
ND
5-O
ct-1
24.
870
664.
982.
4N
D20
-Sep
-11
3.29
066
6.48
546
ND
24-J
an-1
23.
990
665.
78N
MN
D3-
Apr-
123.
930
665.
8468
.3N
D10
-Apr
-12
4.11
066
5.66
NM
ND
10-A
ug-1
24.
200
665.
5711
9.1
ND
5-O
ct-1
24.
800
664.
9726
5.0
ND
20-S
e p-1
10.
970
669.
1950
ND
24-J
an-1
2N
MN
M10
-Aug
-12
2.35
066
7.81
ND
ND
5-O
ct-1
23.
220
666.
94N
DN
D20
-Sep
-11
3.83
566
5.86
335
ND
24-J
an-1
24.
030
665.
67N
MN
D3-
Apr-
123.
980
665.
720.
6N
D10
-Apr
-12
3.94
066
5.76
NM
ND
10-A
ug-1
24.
280
665.
42N
DN
D5-
Oct
-12
4.58
066
5.12
ND
ND
20-S
ep-1
23.
970
665.
93N
DN
D24
-Jan
-12
NM
NM
3-A p
r-12
NM
NM
10-A
pr-1
2N
MN
M10
-Aug
-12
5.17
066
4.73
ND
ND
5-O
ct-1
23.
590
666.
31N
DN
D24
-Jan
-12
3.96
066
5.69
NM
ND
3-Ap
r-12
3.94
066
5.71
0.5
ND
10-A
pr-1
24.
200
665.
45N
MN
D10
-Aug
-12
4.65
066
5.00
ND
ND
5-O
ct-1
25.
010
664.
64N
DN
D24
-Jan
-12
3.90
066
5.75
NM
ND
3-Ap
r-12
3.94
066
5.71
0.5
ND
10-A
pr-1
23.
830
665.
82N
MN
D10
-Aug
-12
4.55
066
5.10
ND
ND
5-O
ct-1
24.
920
664.
73N
DN
D24
-Jan
-12
4.48
066
5.21
NM
ND
3-A p
r-12
3.51
066
6.18
12.5
ND
10-A
pr-1
23.
920
665.
77N
MN
D10
-Aug
-12
3.40
066
6.29
ND
ND
5-O
ct-1
2
(All
conc
entr
atio
ns in
par
ts p
er m
illio
n by
vol
ume
= p
pmv,
unl
ess
note
d)H
VC=
Hyd
roca
rbon
Vap
our
Conc
entr
atio
nO
VC=
Org
anic
Vap
our
Conc
entr
atio
nN
D=
Non
-det
ect
(<0.
1 O
VC o
r no
wat
er in
wel
l)N
M=
Not
Mea
sure
d
668.
81-
666.
156.
7
Froz
en
667.
675.
2
2.4
--1.
5
2.1
-9.
80.
95
Froz
en
664.
205.
5-
667.
30
4.6
665.
5666
8.66
9.5
16-S
ep-1
166
9.70
9.8
0.70
M1
1-1
616
-Sep
-11
664.
39M
12
-20
23-J
an-1
2
M1
2-1
8
M1
2-1
9
669.
696.
1
669.
656.
11.
10
1.20
M1
1-0
5
---
23-J
an-1
266
9.65
0.82
M1
1-1
7
670.
16
14-S
ep-1
166
9.77
-2.
3-
5.3
667.
39
6.9
23-J
an-1
2
14-S
ep-1
1
Bot
tom
(m
)B
otto
m
(m)
2.3
2.3
Top
(m)
3.7
-
Mon
itor
ing
Wel
lIn
stal
l D
ate
Top
of C
asin
g El
evat
ion
(m)
Tota
l D
epth
(m
)St
ick
Up
(m)
M1
1-0
4
M1
1-0
114
-Sep
-11
669.
858.
30.
82
670.
317.
3
Dep
th
Top
(m)
Inst
alla
tion
Dat
a
664.
57
663.
15
665.
71
--
1.5
-4.
60.
90
Mon
itor
ing
Dat
a
Mon
itor
D
ate
Gro
un
dwat
erH
VC
/OV
C
(ppm
v)P
rodu
ctTh
ickn
ess
(cm
)D
epth
(m
)El
evat
ion
(m)
Wel
l Scr
een
- -
5.3
667.
35
5.3
667.
35
Elev
atio
n
-
Froz
enFr
ozen
Froz
enM
12
-09
25-A
pr-0
966
9.90
---
6.8
2.0
Des
troy
ed
-5.
166
7.90
-66
4.80
-66
4.35
-66
4.35
J:\2
012\
12-0
01-S
RD
\Rep
orts
\RM
P\2
012-
11-0
1 R
MP
tabl
es11
/9/2
012