Application LB Application No: Type: Wardmygov.elmbridge.gov.uk/documents/s29450/20200665... ·...

Application No:

2020/0665 Application Type:

LB

Case Officer: Dana Nickson Ward: Esher Ward Expiry Date: 06/05/2020 Location: Claremont Fan Court School Claremont Drive Esher Surrey KT10 9LY Proposal: Listed Building Consent: Refurbishment and alterations to Stable Court

incorporating single-storey front extension, retention of rear and side projections, entrance gates to a height of 1.7m, repair courtyard walls with associated landscaping and internal alterations in association with application for planning permission 2019/3588.

Applicant: Claremont Fan Court Foundation Agent: Mr Claude Delmage

Fletcher Crane Architects 3-4 Home Park Parade Hampton Wick Kingston Upon Thames Surrey KT2 4BY

Decision Level: Planning Committee Recommendation: Grant Listed Building Consent

R e p o r t Description

1. Claremont Fan Court School (the School) is an independent co-educational day school for pupils aged from 2½ to18 years. It is owned and run by the Claremont Fan Court Foundation Limited and is committed to offering an education of the highest order. The School is a well-established private school and is located within the designated Green Belt.

2. The site contains and abuts a number of significant heritage assets, including the Claremont

Mansion building, which is a Grade I Listed Building, the Belvedere, the Walled Gardens, White Cottage and Milestone which are all Grade II* and The Close (Stable Court) and the Ice House, Lodges and Gate Piers which are Grade II. The lodges and access from Claremont Lane, Stable Pond, the Fan Court School site and the National Trust’s Claremont Landscape Gardens are designated as a Grade I Listed Park of Special Historic Interest. The view from the school entrance at Portsmouth Road is one of the few public views of the 18th Century Capability Brown landscaped park and house. Constraints

3. The relevant planning constraints are:

• Grade I, Grade II & Grade II* Listed Buildings • Grade I Historic Park & Garden

Policy

4. In addition to the National Planning Policy Framework and the National Planning Practice

Guidance, the following local policies and guidance are relevant to the determination of this application:

Core Strategy 2011 CS9 – Esher

CS17 – Local Character, Density and Design

Development Management Plan 2015 DM1 – Presumption in favour of sustainable development DM2 – Design and amenity DM6 – Landscape and trees DM7 – Access and parking DM12 – Heritage DM17 – Green Belt (Development of new buildings) Design & Character SPD 2012

Relevant Planning History

5. There is extensive planning history on site, relevant to this planning application are the

following:

Reference Description Decision

2020/0851 Detached two-storey classroom building (90sqm) for a temporary period of 2 years.

Granted

2019/3588 Variation of Condition 1 (Approved Plans) of planning permission 2013/4029 (Re-development of school) for refurbishment and alterations to Stable Court incorporating single-storey front extension, retention of rear and side projections, entrance gates to a height of 1.7m, repair Courtyard Walls and associated landscaping in association with application for listed building consent 2020/0665.

Under Consideration

2018/1170 Variation of Condition 1 (Approved Plans) to the covered shelters to the pre-prep school buildings of planning permission 2013/4029 (outline and full application) to reduce the number of covered shelters from 3 to 2 and increase the size of the existing shelter.

Granted

2017/4165 Listed Building Consent: Demolitions, alterations and extensions to the existing listed Stable Block, Courtyard Walls and ancillary buildings (Stable Court) in association with application 2017/4164.

Granted

2017/4164 Variation of Condition 1 (Approved Plans) of planning permission 2013/4029 (Re-development of school) for refurbishment, alterations and extensions to the Stable Court Area, alterations to openings of Courtyard Walls and part conversion of Coach House to care centre

Granted

2017/2699 To allow the use of a Temporary Classroom Building (131sqm) for a further period of 5 years.

Granted

2016/1565 Screening opinion as to whether an Environmental Impact Assessment is required for a proposed development to provide A Detached two storey classroom building (540 sqm) for a period of ten years as proposed under planning application 2015/2712

Environmental Impact Assessment Not Required

2015/2712 Detached two storey classroom building (540 sqm) for a period of ten years.

Granted

2013/4051 Listed Building Consent in association with the full planning application (phase 1) for the demolition, alterations and extensions to the Stable Court Building, courtyard walls and ancillary buildings, and alterations to the Generator House

Granted Listed Building Consent

2013/4029 Hybrid planning application (part detailed, part outline) for the redevelopment of Claremont Fan Court School involving the demolition and extensions of existing buildings comprising of: Full application for extensions and alterations to the Science/Technology building, extensions and alterations to the Stable Court building, and covered shelters to the Pre-Prep school buildings, with associated site access, car parking and landscaping (phase 1). Outline application for Access and Layout only for all other works including extensions and alterations to the Joyce Grenfell Centre, extensions to the existing sports hall, the formation of a new classroom block to the north of the Science/Technology, and a subterranean indoor swimming pool, along with the relocation of the existing tennis courts to the south west of the site with associated car parking and landscaping.

Granted

Proposal

6. Listed Building Consent is being sought for demolitions, alterations and extensions to the existing listed Stable Block, Courtyard Walls and ancillaries (Stable Court) to be read in conjunction with Variation of Condition under Section 73, 2019/3588.

7. The proposed variations include:

• Variations to the internal arrangement of the floor plans to meet the Prep schools’ current neds.

• Omit previously consented additions to the North and South elevations. • A reduced new build proposal for the new entrance lobby which will relocate main

Prep school entrance via the courtyard. • Retention of previously consented demolition of existing accommodation adjoining

Stable Court. • Defer the Quad landscaping works into the Joyce Grenfell Centre phase in the

masterplan (next phase). • Provide a new central staircase within the Stable Block to improve circulation. • Central light wells to receive roof level roof lights.

8. The initial submitted plans included the construction of a Music Pavilion within the Walled

Garden. The proposed pavilion was considered to be of a contrasting design and added a further mass within the walled garden which appeared to be separated to create a courtyard within the walled garden. This was considered to be unwelcomed and following discussion with the Council’s Officers it was omitted from the proposed variation. Amended plans re-consultation letters have been sent under the S73 application to reflect the omission of the Music Pavilion and retention of the existing outbuilding. Consultations

9. Ancient Monuments Society – No response received to date.

10. British Pipeline Agency – Confirmed that the proposal would not affect the apparatus, but the pipeline is close.

11. Clare Hill (Esher) Association Ltd – Objection on the use of Claremont Drive for access summarised above.

12. English Heritage (South East Region) – No response received to date.

13. Head of Environmental Health – No objection, informative recommended.

14. Historic England – No comments.

15. Natural England – The proposed amendments to the original application are unlikely to have

significant different impacts on the natural environment than the original proposal.

16. Planning Trees – No objection to the proposal on arboricultural grounds subject to the application of the original conditions.

17. Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings – No response received to date.

18. Sports England – The proposal does not fall within either their statutory remint or non-statutory remit, therefore no detailed response provided; general guidance provided.

19. Surrey Bat Group – No comments as no ecological assessment has been provided for the current variations.

20. Surrey Garden Trust – No comments.

21. Surrey Police – No adverse comments received under the S73 application.

22. Surrey Wildlife Trust – No response received to date.

23. SCC Archaeology – Raised no objection subject to the inclusion of the previously imposed conditions.

24. SCC Highways – No objection on Highway safety or capacity grounds to the variations proposed.

25. Thames Water – No response received to date.

26. The Gardens Trust – No comments.

27. The Georgian Group – No response received to date.

28. The Victoria Society – No response received to date.

Representations

29. The Council notified 155 properties and a site notice was displayed outside the main entrance to the site on Portsmouth Road.

30. 20 letters of objection and 1 observation received from 17 different households and Clare Hill (Esher) Association Ltd, in terms of this proposal and that of the S73 application 2019/3588, raising the following concerns:

• Concerns regarding the intention to use Claremont Drive for construction traffic, which

is a very narrow listed carriage way with no footpath not suitable for construction vehicles, and the amount of additional traffic to be generated.

• The use of Claremont Drive should be prohibited, and Portsmouth Road entrance should be used instead.

• Concern regarding the safety of the public and damage done to Claremont Drive as well as damage to listed assets.

• The School should be asked to build the haul road for access as stated in the 2013 application.

• The School should be asked to submit a Method of Construction Plan and Measures for Traffic Management Plan as required by Condition 14 of planning permission 2018/1170.

• The School should be asked to implement procedures as outlined in the 2013 Hybrid Planning Application to reduce school related traffic using Claremont Drive.

• The Council should consult with the Surrey County Council Highways Authority before deciding on this planning application.

• Concerns regarding the impact on the amenity of Claremont Park residents due to noise an unacceptable increase in emissions.

• Concerns that this application is being submitted as an alternative to 2019/3588 in trying to avoid conditions relating to previous consent made in the Hybrid Planning Application.

• Request for a TPO to protect a Cedar of Lebanon Tree.

Positive and Proactive Engagement

31. The National Planning Policy Framework requires local planning authorities to work with the applicant in a positive and proactive manner to resolve problems before the application is submitted and to foster the delivery of sustainable development. This requirement is met within Elmbridge through the availability of pre-application advice.

32. The applicant sought formal re-application advice (PreApp134868941) as well as informal

advice from the Council’s officers.

Planning Considerations

33. The main planning considerations in the determination of this application are:

• The impact upon the character and setting of any of the historic assets located within the application site

The impact upon the character and setting of any of the historic assets located within the application site

34. This application seeks to vary Condition 1 (Approved Plans) of planning permission 2013/4029

for the refurbishment and alterations to Stable Court incorporating a single storey front extension, retention of the rear and side projections, entrance gates to a height of 1.7m, repair of the Courtyard Walls and associated landscaping. Stable Court

35. The proposed refurbishment and extensions include a new entrance as well as windows replacements and alterations. The proposed extension within the courtyard is a large reduction in volume over the approved scheme and the ‘wing’ elements of the stable are to be retained and screened which is considered to be acceptable. In addition, there are no concerns with regards to the internal alterations and the window replacements. Courtyard Historic Walls

36. The proposed works seek to repair the Kent and Vanburgh walls around the outside of the courtyard. These works are considered acceptable and are welcomed. Courtyard Landscaping

37. The proposed works seek to remove the vehicles from this area and to insert new/refurbished hard landscaping. The removal of the vehicles is welcomed; however, the works seek to also undertake resurfacing. The courtyard is currently made up of original fabric which would be lost. Whilst the resurfacing works are considered to be harmful when considered on their own, given the clear heritage benefits of the renovation of the building, on balance, it is considered that on this occasion the benefits would outweigh this harm. To reduce the potential harm, it is considered reasonable to impose a condition requesting that detailed drawings indicating what would be retained and what will be replaced as well as samples of the proposed materials to be

used in the resurfacing are submitted to for approval to the Council prior to any works taking part in this part of the scheme.

Coach Houses

38. The proposed works seek to remove the external streel frame. These works will improve the character of the courtyard and therefore considered to be acceptable.

The Quad Landscaping

39. These elements remain as in the approved scheme and this proposal seeks to defer the works to the next phase, which is considered to be acceptable. Stable Court Carpark

40. These elements remain as in the approved scheme and this proposal seeks to defer the works to the next phase, which is considered to be acceptable.

41. In light of the above, it is considered that the proposed alterations would be acceptable in heritage and design terms due to the benefits of the scheme. As such, the proposal would result in less than substantial harm to the heritage assets and the loss of fabric to the courtyard landscaping is considered to be outweighed by the benefits.

Matters raised in Representations

42. The issues raised largely relate to the S73 application and are therefore not material

considerations to this proposal. However, the concerns raised in relation to the impact upon the heritage assets have been addressed in the considerations above.

43. With regards to the comments stating that the School has said that it intends to use Claremont

Drive as the primary access road for construction traffic, it must be noted that this application does not seek to change any access requirements already established in the masterplan. If the school wishes to request the use of Claremont Drive, a separate application to discharge conditions by means of a Construction Management Plan needs to be submitted for approval to the Council.

44. The comments regarding this application being made as an alternative to 2019/3588 are noted. This is an application for Listed Building Consent in association with 2019/35mm and therefore not an alternative application.

45. The comments requesting a TPO to protect the Cedar of Lebanon Tree are noted. Whilst this is an application for Listed Building Consent and the issues of Trees is not dealt under this application, it must be noted that the part of the proposal closest to the said tree involved the construction of the Music Pavilion which has been omitted from the original proposal. In any event, the Council’s Tree officer was consulted on the initial submitted variation and considered that the construction of the Music Pavilion was not anticipated to have a major impact on the Cedar.

Conclusion

46. On the basis of the above and in light of any other material considerations, the proposal is

considered to be in accordance with the Development Plan. Accordingly, the recommendation is to Grant Listed Building Consent.

The proposed development does not require a CIL payment

Recommendation: Grant Listed Building Consent

Conditions/Reasons 1 LISTED BUILDING CONSENT - TIME LIMIT

The work to which this consent relates must be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date on which the consent is granted.

Reason: To comply with Section 51 of Part 4 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

2 LIST OF APPROVED PLANS

The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the list of approved plans detailed on the attached schedule of plans: TP(11)14 and TP(12)11 Rev A - received 11.03.2020. TP(00)02 Rev C, TP(10)11 Rev C, TP(10)11 Rev C, TP(10)14 Rev B, TP(11)11 Rev B, TP(11)12 Rev B, TP(12)12 Rev B and TP(12)13 Rev B - received on 21.05.2020. Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out in a satisfactory manner.

3 MATERIALS SAMPLES

NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE UNTIL SAMPLES OF THE MATERIALS TO BE USED ON THE EXTERNAL FACES AND ROOF OF THE BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE BOROUGH COUNCIL. DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DETAILS.

Reason: To ensure that a satisfactory external appearance is achieved of the development in accordance with Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015. It is considered necessary for this to be a pre-commencement condition because the use of satisfactory external materials goes to the heart of the planning permission.

4 ARCHAEOLOGY - SCHEME OF WORKING (SITE OF HIGH ARCHAEOLOGICAL

POTENTIAL) NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE UNTIL THE APPLICANT HAS SECURED THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PROGRAMME OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL WORK ON THE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH A WRITTEN SCHEME OF INVESTIGATION WHICH HAS BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE BOROUGH COUNCIL.

Reason: The site is one of/within an area of high archaeological potential and it is important that the archaeological information should be preserved as a record before it is destroyed by the development in accordance with Policy DM12 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

5 RESURFACING OF COURTYARD

Prior to work commencing to this part of the development, detailed drawings showing what is retained and what is replaced as well details on how the new surface is going to be installed and material samples of the proposed materials to be used must be submitted to and approved in writing for approval by the Borough Council. The works must be then carried out in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To ensure that a satisfactory external appearance is achieved of the development in accordance with Policies DM2 and DM12 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

100m

N

STABLE COURTTHE QUAD

WALLED GARDENAND

STABLE COURTCAR PARK

Stable Court Proposed Area

Hybrid application boundary:35.60 Hectares

Figured dimensions only are to be taken from this drawing.All dimensions are to be checked on site before any work is put in hand.Where applicable this drawing must be read in conjunction withadditional information prepared by Fletcher Crane Ltd and/ or others.Client's name:

Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

S73 & LBC

1622Stable CourtClaremont Fan Court School

Claremont Fan Court Foundation Ltd

3-4 Home Park Parade, Hampton Wick, Kingston upon Thames,Surrey, KT1 4BYT +44 (0)20 8977 4693www.fletchercranearchitects.com

Fletcher Crane Architects Ltd

Mark Revision Drawn Date Checked

1:2000

22/01/2018

TP(00)00

Location PLan @ A1

F L E T C H E R C R A N EA R C H I T E C T S

IC

GC

1:4000 @ A3

43.108

STN574

STN2GPS

31.839

STN2GPS

32.144

2886

2224

2225

2227

2229

3213

2975

3154

2710

2880

2876

2709

2787

1954

2280

1999

1997

3198

3199

3200

3201

320232

03

3195

3187

2969

2966

2696

2968

2712

2740

2702

2720

271827

25

2675

2804

2812

239123

92

2387

2788

2372

2802

2791

2786

264826

52

2638

2423

2442

2422

2417

2443

2426

1972

3467

3286

3285

3409

3278

3281

2956

3411

3438

3426

3444

2952

3414

371737

66

3704

3705

2378

1158

1115

1037

2430

2583

2590

2584

1183

1140

1128

1172

1213

1170

1182

1193

1168

134213

48

1216

1215

1233

1345

1352

3812

3795

3416

3420

3896

3872

3878

3808

3810

3790

1059

3834

3859

1119

1120

1495

1496

1509

3868

Science & Technology

Workshop

JOYCE GRENFELLCENTRE

SPORTS HALL

NEW SWIMMINGPOOL BELOW

STABLE COURT

WHITECOTTAGE

MANSION

COACH HOUSES

GENERATORHOUSE

THE QUAD

CAR PARK

Existing parkingto be removed

STABLECOURT

CAR PARK

COURTYARD

PIPELINE EASEMENT

PIPELINE EASEMENT

CLAREMONT DRIVE

NEWHUMANITIES

FACULTY

SCIENCETECHNOLOGY

FACULTY

CEDARLODGE

W A L L E D G A R D E N

E A S T P A R K

N

Detail proposal area

Pedestrian access

Vehicle access and parking (hard)

Main school external campus space

Open parkland

Existing building to be demolished

Proposed parking removal

Pedestrian access points to campus

AB

C

Notes addedUpdated for Section73 Application

Music pavilion and canopy removed fromWalled Garden

GCCD

CD

22/01/201818/12/2019

18/05/2020

ICIC

IC


Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

S73 & LBC






1:500

18/05/2020

TP(00)02

Proposed Site Context Plan @ A1


C IC

CD

1:1000 @ A3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

789101112131415

1

2

3

4

5

6

1

2

3

4

5

6

4,265New Lobby

9,21

6N

ew L

obby

+31.99

+31.99

+31.99

+31.82

+31.82

+32.00

+31.99

+30.46

+31.99

+31.99

+32.95

Historic wall preserved

Historic wall preservedElectrical and data trunking removedNew timber framed windowsto existing openings

Floor modified togive level access

Existing gates refurbished and retainedFloor aboveremovedfor stairs

First floor void infilled

Roof light removed

First floor void infilled

Raised existing cobbles toensure level access into the building

Existing manhole raised to newhard landscaping level

Existing heritage cobbles retained

Existing loose gravel removed



Existing red brickwash down areasretained

Existing red brickwash down areasretained

Existing red brick drainagechannels retained

Concrete seats removed

External levelslowered to allowlevel access

1950s windows replaced

External level lowered toallow level egress - Re landscape

Floor modified togive level access

Planted terraceretaining wall

Weighted timber loose planters and screens

Raised existing cobbles toensure level access into the building

Hoggin

Hoggin

Weighted timber loose planters and screens

Bencharound tree

Low level planting

Low level planting

C O U R T Y A R D COACH HOUSES

REFER TO TP(10)11FOR STABLE COURT

ENTRANCE

STABLE COURT

MAINENTRANCE

60 double pegs100 below seat shoes holes(c.140mm x 140mm)

60 double pegs100 below seat shoes holes(c.140mm x 140mm)

YEAR 5C39 m2 YEAR 3B53 m2

LIBRARY79 m2

HALL24 m2

PREP SCHOOL HALL136 m2

PLANT24 m2

LOBBY34 m2

REPRO7 m2

YEAR 5A43 m2

GIRLS CHANGING25 m2

YEAR 5B43 m2 BOYS CHANGING

25 m2

DIS WC4 m2

YEAR 3A53 m2

EXISTING OFFICES104 m2

STAFF ROOM37 m2

5A ST7 m2

5B STORE6 m2

STORE3 m2

STORE4 m2

HALL7 m2

HALL7 m2

PE STORE9 m2

HEAD SUITE39 m2

DIS WC4 m2

OFFICE 15 m2

STORE6 m2

5C STORE6 m2

HALL12 m2

3B ST13 m2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Existing tarmac removed

Existing heritage cobbles retainedExisting red brick drainagechannels retained

Existing heritage cobbles retained

New glazed entrance lobby1950's structure removed

Reception desk

Grass

PLAYGROUND

OFFICE 26 m2

Proposed new floor area

Existing floor area

Proposed new wall

Exisitng wall

AB

C

Notes addedUpdated for Section73 Application


GCCD

CD

12/03/201818/12/2019

18/05/2020

ICIC

IC


Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

S73 & LBC





Mark Revision Drawn Date Checked 18/05/2020

TP(10)11

Proposed Ground Floor Plan @ A1


C IC

CD

@ A3

+35.48

+35.17

+35.14

+36.35

+36.

29

+35.97

+35.97

Historic wall preserved

COACH HOUSES


C O U R T Y A R DSTABLE COURT

IN ROOM 112 m2

IN ROOM 213 m2

OFFICE 312 m2

6B ST9 m2

4A ST9 m2

YEAR 4A36 m2

YEAR 6C36 m2

YEAR 6B36 m2

MFL31 m2

SPEECH / DRAMA19 m2

FLAT37 m2

YEAR 6A49 m2

BOYS CHANGING16 m2

6A ST14 m2

6C ST7 m2

OFFICE 47 m2

CORRIDOR44 m2

HALL18 m2

YEAR 4B31 m2

4B ST13 m2

GIRLS CHANING16 m2

FLAT37 m2

HALL5 m2

BOYS W/C11 m2

GIRLS W/C11 m2

Historical wall repaired

Historical wall repaired

Replacement windowsas existing

Lower glass canopyto school entrance

Floor removed fornew staircase

General soft strip out throughoutof all ceilings and floor coverings

General soft strip out throughoutof all ceilings and floor coverings

New entrance lobby

Replaced1950s feltroof and repairs

Replaced1950s feltroof andrepairs



Replaced 1950s feltroof and repairs



Grass

Proposed new floor area

Existing floor area

Proposed new wall

Exisitng wall

A

B

Updated for Section73 Application


CD

CD

18/12/2019

18/05/2020

IC

ICFigured dimensions only are to be taken from this drawing.All dimensions are to be checked on site before any work is put in hand.Where applicable this drawing must be read in conjunction withadditional information prepared by Fletcher Crane Ltd and/ or others.Client's name:

Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

S73 & LBC





Mark Revision Drawn Date Checked 18/05/2020

TP(10)12

Proposed First Floor Plan @ A1


B IC

CD

@ A3

STABLE COURT


C O U R T Y A R DC O U R T Y A R D

Roof covering removed for repair.New slates to match existing.

Roof covering removed for repair.New slates to match existing.

Bell tower repaired including:- Stone work- Timber louvres- Bell reinstated- Clock refurbished- Internal structure replaced (currently has wet rot)

All stone coping to be refurbished

All stone coping to be refurbished

All valley gutters to be replaced

Chimneys repaired using tradition methods

Delaminating slates removed and replacedwith new Welsh Slates to match existing

Existing 1950s concrete ridge tilesreplaced with new ridge tiles to matchWelsh slate colours

New roof above existing light wellfinished with match slates and ridge tiles

New roof above existing light wellfinished with match slates

New roof light above new internal space

New roof light above new internal space


Replaced 1950s feltroof and repairs



Replaced1950s feltroof and repairs



No works

No works

No works

No works

No works

Proposed new roof

A

B



CD

CD

18/12/2019

18/05/2020

IC


Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

S73 & LBC






1:100

18/05/2020

TP(10)14

Proposed RoofPlan @ A1


B IC

CD

@ A3

+36.79

+35.69

+31.99

STAFF BLOCK WHITE COTTAGE

+38.53

+35.99

New gate tocraft commission

Roof slates replaced andrepaired to match existing

Quad landscaping deferred toJCG next phase

Timber louvres replacedto match existing

Bell tower refurbished

Existing roof levels maintained Staff block

STABLE COURT AND COACH HOUSESQUAD

NORTH EAST ELEVATION

SOUTH EAST ELEVATION

A

B



CD

CD

18/12/2019

18/05/2020

IC


Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

S73 & LBC






1:100

18/05/2020

TP(11)12

Proposed Elevations: NE and SE @ A1


B IC

CD

@ A3

+40.11

+35.99

+38.53

+32.00 +31.99

+35.74

New timber frames windowsto existing openings

Replacement windows toupper floor as existing Historic wall repaired

1950s extension withvertical timber over cladding


New slate roof covering andnew clay ridge tiles

Ground floor steel windowsand doors to be replaced with timber frames

+31.99

+40.11

+32.00

+35.74+35.47 +35.47

New timber framed glazedwindows to existing openings

Replacement windowsto upper floors to match existing New timber windows

New door to matchSouth West Elevation

Existing roof level maintainedSlates replaced to match existing

Roof repaired

Vertical timber cladding to 1950s extension

PREVIOUS GROUND LEVEL

T H E Q U A D

STABLE COURT

Roof repaired

1950s STAFF ROOM

NORTH-WEST ELEVATION

SOUTH-WEST ELEVATION

A

B



CD

CD

18/12/2019

18/05/2020

IC


Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

S73 & LBC






1:100

18/05/2020

TP(11)11

Proposed Elevations: NW and SW @ A1


B IC

CD

@ A3

+31.99+31.99

+30.61

+35.55

+39.41

+35.97 +35.74

+31.99

+36.50

+40.11

Replacement windowsto upper floor as exisiting

Hall converted tomulti-purpose useNew stair case

First floor windows replacedby matching timber windows

Loose timber screens weighted downwith no impact on heritage items

New rooflight overexisting light well

Timber louvred replacedto match existing

Landscapinglowered

Roof slates replaced andrepaired to match existing.New blue clay ridge tile tomatch existing slates


PREP SCHOOLHALL

ENTRANCELOBBY

COACH HOUSES FACILITIES MANAGEMENT COURTYARD STABLE COURT

+31.99

+38.57

+35.99

+40.32

+39.41

+35.97

+31.99

+33.76

+35.55

+40.11

+36.48

PREP SCHOOLHALL NEWLOBBY

Historic gardenwall preserved

New roof light aboveexisting light well

New roof slates with newclay ridge tiles

New flat roof coveringto 1950s extension

Replaced louvreddoors for plant room

Free standing timberscreens

New floor in place ofdemolished roof

COURTYARDSTABLE COURT COACH HOUSES

SECTION AA

SECTION BB

A

B

A

B

A Updated for Section73 Application CD 18/12/2019 IC Figured dimensions only are to be taken from this drawing.All dimensions are to be checked on site before any work is put in hand.Where applicable this drawing must be read in conjunction withadditional information prepared by Fletcher Crane Ltd and/ or others.Client's name:

Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

S73 & LBC






1:100

20/12/2019

TP(12)11

Proposed Section AA and BB @ A1


A IC

CD

1:200 @ A3

+35.69

+31.99 +31.99

+40.11

3,26

030

01,

290

+34.23

Historic wall repairedExisting wall towalled garden

Neighbouringproperty shown

dashed for clarityNew entrance lobby

Hardwood timber curtain wallingNew timber windows replacing 1950s windows

CLASSROOMCLASSROOM

STABLE COURTQUAD

+38.55

+35.99

+30.51

New gates to craft commission

no work tocoach houses

Neighbouring house shown in dashed lines Historic wall Free standing timber screens Historic wall

KENT ARCHCOACH HOUSE COACH HOUSE QUAD

SECTION CC

SECTION DD

DC

DC

A

B



CD

CD

18/12/2019

18/05/2020

IC


Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

S73 & LBC






1:100

18/05/2020

TP(12)12

Proposed Section CC and DD @ A1


B IC

CD

@ A3

+33.76

+35.69

+31.99

+40.11

+35.11

+30.48

+35.55

Hardwood posts and framesto new lobby glazed screen Historic wall repaired

Existing wall towalled garden

Louvre repair New windows to replace 1950swindowsTimber screens

New entrance lobby

Timber screens

STABLE COURT

C O U R T Y A R D

QUAD

+38.55

+35.99

+30.51

New gates to craft commission

no work tocoach houses

Neighbouring house shown in dashed lines Historic wall Free standing timber screens Historic wall

KENT ARCHCOACH HOUSE COACH HOUSE QUAD

SECTION EE

SECTION FF

FE

FE

A

B



CD

CD

18/12/2019

18/05/2020

IC


Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

S73 & LBC






1:100

18/05/2020

TP(12)13

Proposed Section EE and FF @ A1


B IC

CD

@ A3

1,68

5

existing opening

New black cast iron crafted gatesto match previous heritage gates

Existing Kent brick arch to The Close

Existing hinge retained and usedto hang replacement craft made gates

Existing light

1,68

5


New black cast iron crafted gatesto match previous heritage gates

Existing light

Black cast iron crafted gatesto match previous heritage gates


Existing hinge retained and usedto hang replacement craft made gates

COACH HOUSE COACH HOUSE

Proposed Kent Arch Gates - South Elevation 1:25Proposed Kent Arch Gates - Section 1:25

Proposed Kent Arch Gates - Plan 1:25

1:50


Scale:

DrawnJob No:

Status:

Drawing No:

Checked

Date

RevJob title:

Drawing title:

Planning






1:25

16/01/2020

TP(11)14

The Close - Gates between coach houses @ A1


IC

CD

@ A3

Location PlanProposed Site Context PlanProposed Ground Floor PlanProposed First Floor PlanProposed Roof PlanProposed Elevations_ NE and SEProposed Elevations_ NW and SWProposed Section AA and BBProposed Section CC and DDProposed Section EE and FFProposed gates between coach houses

Date post:	09-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	19 times
Download:	1 times

Application LB Application No: Type: Wardmygov.elmbridge.gov.uk/documents/s29450/20200665... ·...

Documents