bar123, 09.09.2006 C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Standard\Eigene Dateien\CD-Service\ETH 10_a\alles\CD-1\Poster für Proceedings\Braun-EMPA-Summary 1.doc 1/2
Application of small angle and wide angle X-ray scattering for the characterization of carbonaceous materials, aerosols, and particles
Artur Braun
University of Kentucky
Department of Materials & Chemical Engineering
Consortium for Fossil Fuel Sciences
605 Limestone Street
Lexington KY 40506, USA
Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) can provide quantitative information on internal surface areas, porosity, particle size, void size distributions, surface roughness and fractal dimension of surfaces, interfaces and particles and aggregate structures. Applied in-situ and ex-situ, SAXS even permits to derive kinetic parameters for chemical reactions and transformations. In particular homogeneous systems such as soot can be studied with SAXS, and carbonaceous materials have been widely used to develop this technique. Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) permits to measure crystallite sizes and to distinguish aromatic and aliphatic structures in carbon materials. WAXS was particularly applied for coal research. We present here studies that we made on diesel exhaust soot for combustion enginering and environmental science, as well as studies on model systems such as glassy carbon (pore size and connectivity evolution) and on aerogels (inclusion of third phases such as metal clusters).
Scattering techniques, including light scattering (LS), provide statistically very robust data, complementary and often even superior to microscopy data. Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), when done at synchrotron radiation sources, can provide data very fast. At best, a scattering curve can be obtained in a fraction of 1 second. High resolution data may need about 15 minutes to cover a length scale from several microns to 1 nanometer. A shortcoming of scattering techniques is that they do require some minimum amount of material, such as milligrams, which always exceeds the amount necessary for TEM studies, which ultimately needs one tiny particle only. Also, SAXS cannot be applied very well for chemically very inhomogeneous systems. However, for soot studies, SAXS is perfect. Wide angle X-ray scattering (WAXS), pretty mch like SAXs, is a diffuse scattering technique which basically uses profile and background scattering analysis. It has been extensively applied for coal research with much success.
A quantitative methodology has been developed for analysis of SAXS data obtained from diesel soots which is capable of distinguishing three characteristic size parameters that characterize the soot: a soot particle agglomerate size, a primary particulate size, and a particulate sub-unit size, depending on engine and fuel conditions. The most prominent feature is visible in the log-log plot of scattering curves between q = 0.001 °A−1 and 0.01, which is due to soot particle agglomerates. In addition to differences in the soot primary particle and aggregate size, the stiffness of the aggregates was probed by pressing soot powder into pellets under various pressures. The scattering pattern of soot experiences systematic changes upon pressurizing, in particular a systematic, pressure dependent shift of the aggregate size signature which can be used to characterize the stiffness of the aggregates. Diesel soot from idle and load engine condition was pressed into pellets at
pressures ranging up to approximately 8.5 GPa. Soot powder was also immersed in acetone in order to obtain soot aggregates without agglomeration. Small angle X-ray scattering was carried
bar123, 09.09.2006 C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Standard\Eigene Dateien\CD-Service\ETH 10_a\alles\CD-1\Poster für Proceedings\Braun-EMPA-Summary 1.doc 2/2
out on the powder, the pellets, and on the acetone immersed soot. Powder and pellets show characteristic aggregate structure at small scattering vectors. Scattering curves of the pellets show a shift of the aggregate size related scattering feature towards larger scattering vectors for increasing pressure. For the highest pressures, this aggregate structure vanished, while the suspected primary particle scattering became visible as the asymptote of the aggregate scattering structure. Aggregate size of powder was about 290 nm for the idle soot and 240 nm for the load soot. Primary particle size was 14.3 and 10.2 nm, respectively. Idle soot showed a higher compressibility than the load soot. Pressing the soot into pellets eliminates scattering from aggregation of primary particles and provides a good route to reveal the otherwise inaccessible primary particle scattering. In addition, studying the aggregate structure as a function of pellet pressure permit to derive compacticity data of the soot. Without extracting volatiles, it is ultimately not possible to quantify the impact of the volatiles like lubricants and fuel on the compaction behaviour of the soot under pressure. This remains particularly unclear for idle soot, which contains more volatiles than load soot but yet strongly resists pressure. The USAXS technique combined with pressing pellets appears to be valuable for the study of materials which are built from aggregates of primary particles, such as soot, or carbon black, silica gel, and many other materials. The advantage of using scattering techniques is that a considerable amount of material can be studied with reasonable experimental effort, providing robust and statistically representative data compared to single aggregate analysis.
Present address:
Empa Dübendorf
High Performance Ceramics
Überlandstrasse 129
CH – 8600 Dübendorf
Application of small angle and wide angle X-ray scattering for thecharacterization of carbonaceous materials, aerosols, and particles
A.Braun a , N. Shah a, F.E. Huggins a, S. Seifert b, J. Ilavsky c,h, G.E. Thomas d, H. Francis e, K.E. Kelly f, A.F. Sarofim f
S.N. Ehrlich g, P.R. Jemian i,h, G.P. Huffman a, W. Gille j
Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) can provide quantitative information on internal surface areas, porosity, particle size, void size distributions, surface roughness and fractal dimension of surfaces, interfaces and particles and aggregate structures. Applied in-situ and ex-situ, SAXS even permits to derive kinetic parameters for chemical reactions and transformations. In particular homogeneous systems such as soot can be studied with SAXS, and carbonaceous materials have been widely used to develop this technique. Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) permits to measure crystallite sizes and to distinguish aromatic and aliphatic structures in carbon materials. WAXS was particularly applied for coal research. We present here studies that we made on diesel exhaust soot for combustion enginering and environmental science, as well as studies on model systems such as glassy carbon (pore size and connectivity evolution) and on aerogels (inclusion of third phases such as metal clusters).
Financial support by National Science Foundation grant # CHE-0089133. Most NEXAFS spectra recorded at BL 9.3.2. at the Advanced Light Source, Berkeley Nat’l Lab. STXM performed at Beamline X1A at the NSLS, operated by SUNY for United States Dept. of Energy, Contract # DE-AC02-76CH-00016. SAXS was performed at BESSRC-CAT, and USAXS performed at the UNICAT facility at the Advanced Photon Source (APS), supported by the Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Materials Research Laboratory (U.S. DOE, the State of Illinois-IBHE-HECA, and the NSF), the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (U.S. DOE contract with UT-Battelle LLC), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S. Department of Commerce) and UOP LLC. APS is supported by U.S. DOE, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38).
Objective
CFFS
Scattering techniques, including light scattering (LS), provide statistically very robust data, complementary and often even superior to microscopy data. Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), when done at synchrotron radiation sources, can provide data very fast. At best, a scattering curve can be obtained in a fraction of 1 second. High resolution data may need about 15 minutes to cover a length scale from several microns to 1 nanometer. A shortcoming of scattering techniques is that they do require some minimum amount of material, such as milligrams, which always exceeds the amount necessary for TEM studies, which ultimately needs one tiny particle only. Also, SAXS cannot be applied very well for chemically very inhomogeneous systems. However, for soot studies, SAXS is perfect. Wide angle X-ray scattering (WAXS), pretty mch like SAXs, is a diffuse scattering technique which basically uses profile and background scattering analysis. It has been extensively applied for coal research with much success.
References[1] A.W. Kandas et al, Carbon 2005, 43(2), 241-251.[2] A. Braun, Comment on soot oxidation, Carbon 2006, 44(7), 1313-1315.[3] A. Braun, N. Shah, F.E. Huggins, G.P. Huffman, K.E. Kelly, A. Sarofim, S.B. Mun, S.N. Ehrlich, Carbon, in press.[4] S. di Stasio, A. Braun.. Energy & Fuels 2006, 20(1), 187-194.[5] M.A. Beno, S. Seifert, et al.. Nucl. Instr. Meth. in Phys. Res. A 467–468 (2001) 690–693.[6] A. Braun, N. Shah, F.E. Huggins, K.E. Kelly, A. Sarofim, C. Jacobsen, S. Wirick, et al, Carbon
43, (12), 2431-2642 (2005).[7] A. Braun, S. Wirick, C. Jacobsen, F.E. Huggins, S.B. Mun, N. Shah. Carbon 43 (2005) 117-124.[8] A. Braun, J. Ilavsky, S. Seifert, P. R. Jemian. J. Appl. Phys. 98, 073513 (2005).[9] A. Braun, F. E. Huggins, S. Seifert, J. Ilavsky, K. Kelly, A. Sarofim, G. P. Huffman.Combustion & Flame
137 (1/2) pp. 63-72 (2004).[10] A. Braun, F.E. Huggins, C. Jacobsen, S. Wirick, K. Kelly, A. Sarofim, G.P. Huffman. Fuel (2004) 10 7/8 997-1000.[11] A. Braun, M. Bärtsch, R. Kötz, O. Haas, H.-G. Haubold, G. Goerigk. J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 260 (1-2), 1-14 (1999).[12] W. Gille and A. Braun. Journal of Non-crystalline Solids (2003) 321:89-95.[13]D.L. Wertz, Quin JL. WAXS as a tool to measure the short-range structural units in coals.Abstr. Pap. J. Am. Chem. Soc 216: 080-FUEL Part 1 AUG 23 1998.
a) Univ. of Kentucky, Dept. of Materials & Chem. Eng., Lexington, KYb) Chemistry Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne ILc) Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette IN d) Center of Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington KYe) Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY
f) Univ. of Utah, Dept. of Chemical & Fuels Eng., Salt Lake City, UTg) NSLS, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NYh) APS, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, ILi) Univ. of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, ILj) Martin-Luther Universität Halle Wittenberg, Germany
10-2
100
102
104
106
108
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Scattering vector q [10/nm]
a)b)
c)
d)
e)
I = const. N V2 exp (-R2q2/3)
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
5
10
15
20
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1s=2 sinΘ/λ [A]
(002)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(004)
(103)
(110) (112)
(006)
(201)
diesel, idle
diesel, load
γ
0
5
10
15
20
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1s=2 sin Θ /λ [Α]
Diesel
Mix A
Mix B
Aromaticity f of diesel sootdiesel diesel Mix
Adiesel Mix
B
idle 0.15 0.34 0.31
load 0.22 0.15 0.08
10 15 20 25 30 352Θ [o]
γ-Band
(002)Bragg reflex
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
q [1/A]
Diesel
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
q [1/A]
Mix A
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
q [1/A]
Mix B
Left: X-ray diffractograms from load/idle soot, and reference Bragg peaks of graphite (2H Graphite PDF 26-1079). Center: Deconvolution of Peak into (002) and γ-sideband for determination of aromaticity. Right: Comparison of load/idle soot XRD from Diesel and oxygenated Diesel Mix A, Mix B.
Quantitative analysis of diffuse XRD diffractograms (WAXS) provides information on aromaticity (area under γ-band peak vs. the entire peak area, including (002) peak), ratio of crystalline/amorphous carbon (background scattering), and crystallite sizes (Scherrer Formula).
Idle soot particles have smaller crystallites than load soot. Aromaticity higher for idle soot from oxygenated Diesel (Mix A, Mix B). Idle soot contains more amorphous carbon than crystalline carbon. Adding oxygenates to fuel causes bigger differences in the structure between idle and load soot, in line with NEXAFS and TGA.
Left: Log-log plot of small angle scattering curves reveal at least 5 size ranges in Diesel PM, with size L=2π/q. Curve with open symbols was obtained after subtraction of Porod- and constant background scattering. Exponent of decay allows determination of fractal dimension, and was close to –4 for high q range and thus indicates smooth surfaces of primary particles and sub-units. For low q, exponents of decay are close to –3. Right: Comparison of scattering curves for soot and glassy carbon, a standard SAXS material with many micropores.
Elementary particles sizes 1-2 nm range. Form compact cluster to built subunits of 15-20 nm size. These build up larger structures (primary particles) of 40-80 nm, which form aggregates. Aggregates are found at q-values of 0.001 1/A, though harder to resolve in the SAXS curves. Idle soot has generally larger particles than load soot.
Soot Elementaryunits D[nm]
Sub unitsD [nm]
Primary Particles D [nm]
high q exponent
Fractal dimension
low qexponent
Fractal dimension
Diesel, idle 1.5 17.4 49.16 3.99 2.01 3.28 2.72
Diesel, load 1.6 14.5 41.50 3.86 2.14 3.12 2.88
Mix A, idle 1.9 21.1 (14.2 78.29 3.97 2.03 3.02 2.98
Mix A, load 1.4 13.8 (12) 36.78 3.96 2.04 3.09 2.91
Mix B, idle 2.0 14.3 (14.5 83.85 3.92 2.08 2.96 2.96
Mix B, load 1.4 22.0 (18.6 48.73 3.98 2.02 2.75 2.75
Left: Diesel exhaust from heavy duty truck. Right: Diesel soot sample generation at Univeritu of Utah.
New Address:EMPA DübendorfHigh Performance Ceramics
Wide Angle X-ray Scattering
Aromaticiy of oxygenated and non-oxygenated diesel exhaust PM for idle and load engine conditions.
280 285 290 295 300
Energy [eV]
ferrocene doped
reference
Ferrocene is added to diesel fuel in order to prevent formation of graphitic soot structures. This facilitates subsequent soot oxidation in aftertreatment devices. WAXS data explicitly show that ferrocene soot lacks significantly in graphite-like structures. Instead, a large aliphatic gamma side-band is observed. Results in line with NEXAFS spectroscopy data, as shown in the Figure below.
2.08
2.1
2.12
2.14
2.16
2.18
2.2
2.22
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
3.2
0 50 100 150 200 250
X-r
ay d
ensi
ty ρ
x [g/
cm3 ] SA
XS decay exponent n
Activation time [min]
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
107
109
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
USA
XS
inte
nsity
[a.
u.]
Scattering vector q [1/Å]
-1.4
-3.0
-3.7-2.5
ag
b
c
d
e
f
acetone/0.00apowder/0.17b
1.74c3.47d5.21e6.94f8.33g
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-110-2
10-1
100
101
I q2 [
a.u.
]
Scattering vector q [1/Å]
1) in acetone, no pressure2) as powder, 0.17 GPa assumed
3) pellet, 1.74 GPa4) pellet, 8.33 GPa
1)
2)
3)
4)
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
USA
XS
inte
nsity
[a.
u.]
Scattering vector q [1/Å]
-3.8
-2.0
-4.0
acetone
powder
pellet
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
Iq2 [
a.u.
]
Scattering vector q [1/Å]
acetone
powder
pellet
acetonepowder
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
aggr
egat
e le
ngth
[Å
]
pressure [GPa]
idle
load
10-2
100
102
104
106
108
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Scattering vector q [Å-1]
x Mix Bidle
o Mix Bload
10-2
100
102
104
106
108
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Scattering vector q [Å-1]
x Mix Aidle
o Mix Aload
q-3
10-2
100
102
104
106
108
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Scat
teri
ng c
ross
sec
tion
dΣ/
dΩ [
a.u.
]
Scattering vector q [Å-1]
x Dieselidle
o Dieselload
q-4
0 0.01 0.02
Iq2 [
a.u.
]
q [Å-1]
x Dieselidle
o Dieselload
+ NIST1650
0 0.01 0.02
q [Å-1]
Mix Bidle
Mix Bload
0 0.01 0.02
q [Å-1]
Mix Aload
Mix Aidle
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
I q2 [
a.u.
]
q [Å-1]
x Dieselidle
o Dieselload
pellet
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
q [Å-1]
x Mix Bidle
o Mix Bload
pellet
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
q [Å-1]
x Mix Aidle
o Mix Aload
pellet
10-1
101
103
105
107
109
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
I(q)
[a.
u.]
Scattering vector q [Å-1]
x Mix Aidle
o Mix Aload
10-1
101
103
105
107
109
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
I(q)
[a.
u.]
Scattering vector q [Å-1]
x Mix Bidle
o Mix Bload
10-1
101
103
105
107
109
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
I(q)
[a.
u.]
Scattering vector q [Å-1]
x Dieselidle
o Dieselload
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
1 10
USA
XS
inte
nsity
[a.
u.]
q [1/Å] * R [Å]
3π/25π/2
7π/2
CO2 - dried
10-3
10-1
101
103
105
107
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100
d∑/d
Ω [
cm2 /c
m3 s
rad-1
]
q [Å-1]
NIST 1650reference soot
Glassy carbonK-type, 60 micron
Glassy carbonG-type, 1 mm
Glassy carbonK-type, 1 mm
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
γ ''(r
) [n
m-2
]
r [nm]
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
γ(r)
r [nm]
-1
0
1
2
3
4
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
γ ''(r
) [n
m-2
]
r [nm]
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
γ(r)
r [nm]
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4 2.8
Indicator function
i(r)
r
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4 2.8
Fluctuation
η (r)
r
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4 2.8
Function of occupancy
Z(r
)
r
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4 2.8
Simulated CF of the model
γ(r)
r
Model-parameters (non-activated): <l>=0.4 nm, <m>=1.3 nm, p=25%
Figure 3
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Indicator function
i(r)
r
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Fluctuation
η (r)
r
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Function of occupancy
Z(r
)
r
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Simulated CF of the model
γ(r)
r
Model-parameters (activated): <l>=0.7 nm, <m>=1.5 nm, p=33%
Figure 4
Porosity and Chord Length distribution
Fractality and Roughness
Inhomogeneity and Metal Inclusions
Kubota2-cylinderZ482B
Land&SeaWater break Dynamometer+ Controller
GC/MS
Gas-phase Analyzer CO, NO2, NOX, O2
High-volumesampler
Off-line analysis: NMR, TEM, CCSEM, TD-GC/MS, XRF,XAS, XRD, SAXS,isotope analysis
SMPS&OPC PA&PAS
Critical orificeDiluted exhaust
Compressed, dry, particle-free air
Samples: Diesel PM from 50/50 Chevron/Phillips reference fuels T22/U15,oxygenated with DEC and ethanol, operated under idle/load. Oxygenated fuel is called “Mix A” and “Mix B”. Addition of 1000 ppm ferrocene to some of the fuels was made to catalytically oxidize the soot and prevent graphitization.
Particle and pore size and porosity in diesel soot and GC
Pressure and compaction studies with USAXS
Left: SAXS scattering curves for diesel soot as poder, pressed pellet, and immersed in acetone. Sample environment modiefies soot aggregation slightly and has impact on scattering curve. Right: Shift of characteristic structures in scattering curves upon pressurizing of samples indicates aggregate rearrangement. Soot structure depending on engine operation + fuel additives
Sample Lc (002) [Å]
La (110) [Å]
La (112) [Å]
Diesel, idle 11.10 8.67 17.24
Diesel, load 11.78 10.48 16.68
Mix B, idle 10.18 6.96 13.24
Mix B, load 12.86 8.64 14.92
Mix A, idle 8.64 8.93 6.24
Mix A, load 10.78 16.30 11.19
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Dies id Diesel lo Mix A id Mix A lo Mix B id Mix B lo
Ratio amorphous/crystalline carbon
Idle soot particles have smaller crystallites than load soot. Aromaticity is higher for idle soot from oxygenated Diesel (Mix A, B). Idle soot contains more amorphous carbon (upper part of column, grains) than crystalline carbon (lower part, planes). Adding oxygenates to the fuel causes bigger differences in the structure between idle and load soot, in line with observations form the NEXAFS and TGA.
Chemical reduction of samples alters SAXS curves, too. Anomalous SAXS permits to study solely the metal inclusions by contrast variation. Metal clusters can be modelled by spheres (bottom, left). Shape profile of particle size distribution suggests Ostwald ripening as coarsening process (upper, right).
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
10 15 20 25 30 35 40Time [min]
Sample Moisture [%]
Volatile (Extract) [%]
Carbon [%]
Ash [%]
idle 1.757 23.78 (42.7) 70.521 4.699
load 1.145 14.36 (14.3) 80.150 3.490
idle, Mix B
1.917 56.19 (48.9) 36.077 4.733
load, Mix B
1.375 16.75 (10.5) 76.340 2.910
idle, Mix A
2.488 61.80 (31.6) 28.586 4.614
load, Mix A
1.025 14.09 (5.9) 77.772 2.138
Thermogravimetric Analysis
Left: TGA profiles of load (black) and idle (red) soot from oxygenated Diesel, including the temperature profile TGA was operated with N2, and at 750oC with O2. Right: Summary of TGA results. Data in parentheses are based on Soxhlet extraction. Idle soot contains more volatiles.
Quantitative data for diesel soot
Maxima in Kratky plots of scattering curves provide information about compactness of soot particles and size of agglomerates: L=π/q.
Systematic scattering study on samples compacted at different pressures shows a systematic trend for aggregate size rearrangement, which can be used for elasticity estimation.
Porosity evolution of activated (right side) and non-activated GC (left) was studied by SAXS. Based on first geometric principles (Rosiwals linear integration principle, isotropic uniform random chord length distributions), porosities have been obtained, in contrast to more conventional techniques, by means of the second derivative of the small-angle scattering correlation function γ(r). Estimates of the porosity p are based on the range order L = 2.5 nm, which corresponds to a sequence pore/wall/pore by means of a so-called linear simulation model (bottom, blue, green). Specific assumptions about size, shape, pore topology, are not required.
Oxidation Studies
SAXS useful for soot oxidation studies. Here, GC is used as a model for soot oxidation to study the changes in surface fractal dimension and X-ray density with SAXS and WAXS as a function of oxidation time. While for extensive oxidation a compaction of the carbon structures are observed, an expansion of graphene sheets is observed in an initial phase.
Aerogel are ultrahigh surface area materials and allow for metalnanoparticle inclusions. Here we studied a Fischer-Tropsch fuel catalyst as a model for metal inclusion in high porous carbon (see for instance iron oxide inclusions in soot from ferrocene doped fuel). Cobalt-doped and non-doped silica aerogels show significantly different SAXS curves (upper, left).
Impact of ferrocene on the structure of diesel exhaust soot as probed with wide-angle X-ray scattering and C(1s) NEXAFS spectroscopy, CARBON, in press, doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2006.05.051