1
Appraising Employee Performance
Your FacultyYour Faculty
Medical Laboratory Director InCyte Pathology
David Hoak, M.D.
AcknowledgementsGary Gemar, MS,MT(ASCP)
Kelcey Hendrickson
Click NEXT to continue
Kelcey Hendrickson, CGSp(ASCP)cm,HemSp(ASCP)cm,MLT(ASCP)cm
Jean Marie Dillon, MA, CFPʀVP Human Resources & Development
American Society for Clinical PathologyFor their contributions
Introduction
Motivating and managing the work of others in pursuit of organizational goals
• clearly communicating yourclearly communicating your expectations
• coaching individuals to improve skills and performance
• evaluating performance through an annual or semi-annual appraisal
A positive experience requires a basic understanding of the performance
Click NEXT to continue
A positive experience requires a basic understanding of the performance appraisal process as well communicating with and preparing your employees.
2
PerformanceDevelopment Cycle
INTRODUCTION
Appraise
Determine common lab performance requirements, prepare your staff for the appraisal process, and conduct the appraisal using best practices while avoiding bias.
Click NEXT to continue
Why do them?
• Build relationships with team
Performance Appraisals
INTRODUCTION
• Motivate team members to succeed
• Maintain or improve current performance
• Impact future performance
• Document behavior
• Opportunity for staff to give feedback
3
How do supervisors feel about them?
• I am somewhat nervous when conducting employee performance appraisals
Performance Appraisals
INTRODUCTION
• There is not enough time or information to do a good review
• The appraisal is my chance to share with them my praise or criticism that I have kept track of in my head
• I prepare for performance appraisals shortly b f th dbefore they are due
• My reviews are subjective and not based on any concrete data
How do personnel feel about them?
• Each supervisor/manager rates his/her staff differently
Performance Appraisals
INTRODUCTION
y
• I feel a rating of “Satisfactory” or “Meets Expectations” is like getting a “C” grade
• I feel like I am only rated on what has recently happened
• I am fearful that there will be surprises and I will be caught off guard
4
Upon completing this course you will be able to:
• Identify common Lab performance appraisal requirements
• Describe the performance appraisal life cycle
Learning Objectives INTRODUCTION
• Describe the performance appraisal life cycle
• Discuss how you and your employees can prepare for the performance appraisal
• Identify the components of a typical Lab performance assessment form
• Discuss how to avoid perceptual distortions and errors when conducting assessment
C d t f i l i b t ti• Conduct a performance appraisal using best practices
Matt works in a busy anatomic pathology laboratory. He is a seasoned cytotechnologist with 8 years of experience
Scenario INTRODUCTION
cytotechnologist with 8 years of experience. His efficiency is near the top of the department and his abnormal rate is in the expected range.
Matt’s supervisor, Jim, would like him to work on the following:
• improve his ability to work as a team player
Click NEXT to continue
• mentor newer techs to be more efficient without losing quality
• communicate more effectively with his team in a positive manner
5
Scenario
Thanks! I have been working hard to make sure that cases are done in an efficient manner without
sacrificing quality. I just don’t see how I have the time to train new people.
PREPARATION
Matt, I would like to thank you for your significant contribution to the efficiency of the department. Your hard work has kept the department above it’s goal for the daily turn-around-time. Now we need to focus on you passing on your great work habits to the newer
members of our lab.
Click NEXT to continue
Scenario
That makes sense I guess, but, I really don’t feel prepared. I know we have a new staff member
starting next week. Do you have any suggestions to prepare me for working with her?
INTRODUCTION
I know we haven’t discussed this before, but, I really feel like this is an area you need to work on. Your communication skills and relationship with
your team are important to ensuring that your team can continue to meet our TAT requirements.
Click NEXT to continue
6
When regular feedback is not established
• Performance appraisal process
Preparing for Performance Appraisals
PREPARATION
• Performance appraisal process becomes stressful for everyone
• Employees are unsure of their supervisors’ expectations or their progress
• Reviews become one sided and employees do not feel the supervisor has their best interest in mind
Why regular meetings are important?
• Expectations are set way in advance
Benefits of Regular Feedback
PREPARATION
• Expectations are set way in advance and discussed regularly; they become more clearly established
• Performance measures are more clearly communicated
• Employees feel more confident knowing their supervisors are interested in their progressp g
• Supervisors feel more confident about progress towards their overall goals
7
Benefits of Regular Feedback
Discussions about issues should take place prior to the performance appraisal process. Schedule regular check-ins with employees.
PREPARATION
Regular feedback results in
• Better performance appraisal experience
• Issues are addressed sooner rather than later
• Supervisors and employees can voice concerns and ask questions
• Employees become more comfortable meeting with the supervisor
Coaching sessions give the supervisor smaller snapshots of the employees performance. It also provides the employee with a sense of security.
PREPARATIONBenefits of Regular Feedback
Regular feedback results in
• Supervisors are more informed about employee performance when preparing for performance appraisal
• Employees feel more secure going into the performance appraisal because they know what to expect
• Employee adjusts performance basedEmployee adjusts performance based on consistent reminders of expectations
• Employees have more success making smaller adjustments rather than trying to make big moves
8
PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS
Performance AppraisalComponents
Based on prior
expectations
Performance Appraisals
p
Summarize and validate
prior conversations
Highlight hi t
Specify ways to improve
Agree on future goals
that are S.M.A.R.T.
Click NEXT to continue
achievements
Discuss areas for
improvement
to improve performance
Performance Appraisals
• Typically completed twice per year for new
PERFORMANCE APPRAISALSEffective Appraisals
employees and annually there after
• Examine employee performance over a 6 month and 1 year cycle
• Supervisor and employee meet in person and event is documented
• 60-minute conversation
• Supervisor and employee typically sign and p p y yp y gdate the form
9
Performance Appraisals
• Document is placed in the personnel file
P id t t b
Effective Appraisals PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS
• Provide a copy to team member
• Justifiable should a demotion or termination be challenged
• Liabilities for bad documentation exist
You should:• Remind your team of expectations by
providing an agreement about specific d l
Best Practices PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS
measures and goals
• Generate content including work samples, notes and recollections of performance for the entire year
• Formulate a tentative appraisal
• Set it aside and review it a day prior to the performance appraisal
Click NEXT to continue
10
You should:• Be prepared to have a dialog with your
employees about their performance
Best Practices DOCUMENTATION
• Document your ratings when employees have performed at a Superior or More than Satisfactory level
• Document specific areas where improvement is needed or unsatisfactory
Click NEXT to continue
Expectations of the Employee • Ask employees to write a tentative self-
appraisal that includes specifics about
Best Practices DOCUMENTATION
performance
• List areas of accomplishments including Superior or More than Satisfactory ratings with examples
• List areas for improvement with examples
Click NEXT to continue
11
Major Task Accomplishment Impact Obstacles
Accurately perform microscopic screening to
Screen 72 slides/day in an8 hour shift
Surpassed minimum workload requirements by
Difficult cases could slow down screening productivity
Documentation
microscopic screening to diagnose gynecological and non-gynecological specimens
8 hour shift workload requirements by 5%
down screening productivity
Participate in Quality Assurance Programs
(GYN) – 98% accuracy for all diagnoses every 6 months(Non-GYN) – 94% accuracy for all specimen types every 6 months
Reduced number of false negative slides by 1% from previous 6 months
Variation in diagnosis by multiple reviewers
Trains other Trains new Reduced time spent Cytotechnologist does not Cytotechnologists on entering patient information and diagnosis into computer system
Cytotechnologists to successfully enter data and microscopic descriptions with an accuracy rate of 99.95% at a rate of 9/hour in 6 months
entering information in computer system by 10% from pervious 6 months
y guse the macroscopic diagnostic short cut descriptions appropriately to enter diagnoses
Click NEXT to continue
Expectations of the Employee • Provide employees with a blank evaluation form
• Employees are more prepared to discuss
DOCUMENTATIONBest Practices
p y p pspecifics creating a more meaningful experience
• Helps fill in details needed for a score that is above or below in the prior appraisal
Click NEXT to continue
12
Scenario
Mary has her annual evaluation with several of her team members in the next month The best way to prepare for it is:
Multiple Choice PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS
a. Wait until the last minute and write the evaluations up an hour before they are scheduled.
b. Have each employee fill out his or her own evaluation and just sign off on it.
c. Carefully begin gather data on each employees performance in the last year-including expectations on performance and a list of issues that she have been meaning to discuss with them.
month. The best way to prepare for it is:
Click HERE to the 4 Keys Menu
d. Pull out data from her quarterly coaching sessions to refresh herself on issues that she has discussed with them in the past.
Scenario MEASURING PERFORMANCE
I gave you a 4 out of 5 in the category of quality assurance. I am pleased with your
initial progress in reducing your team’s errors over the last two quarters, but feel there is
Thanks Jim. The checklists we have implemented have helped reduce the error rates by 5%. It sounds like you have some additional ideas to decrease the error rates further, can we
discuss your ideas?
over the last two quarters, but feel there is room for further improvement.
Click NEXT to continue
13
I been looking at specimen tracking software and if we implement the product, I believe we can reduce the error rate to less that 1% for all samples processed. I want you to work
Scenario MEASURING PERFORMANCE
with the vendor, IT staff and me to determine if we can achieve this reduced error rate.
That sounds like a S.M.A.R.T. goal and an opportunity for me to get more experience working with vendors and IT. We can add
Click NEXT to continue
that to my list of outcomes for the next 6 months.
• diagnostic ability
• pathology and business
• judgment
• problem-solving
Performance Measures
MEASURING PERFORMANCE
Typical performance measures include
p gyknowledge
• performance of job duties
• productivity
• adaptability
p g
• customer service
• accountability/ethics
• cross-cultural sensitivity
• professional development
Click NEXT to continue
14
Performance Measures
MEASURING PERFORMANCE
Professionalism•follows standards of conduct
•safety and compliance•work ethic
End‐of‐period Outcomes •accomplishments•impacts•cost or time savings
Manner of performance •timeliness•quantity of work•quality of work
•respects diversity and authority
•attendance
g•degree of “customer” satisfaction
q y•reliability•positive relationships with coworkers
Click NEXT to continue
• Job Duties
• Ability to perform all of the duties expected measured against a data-driven standard
Rating Performance MEASURING PERFORMANCE
g
• Professionalism
• Attendance to meetings
• Provide leadership
• Employee Responsibilities
• Safety, Attendance, Compliance, Continuing y, , p , gEducation
Click NEXT to continue
15
Typical Rating Scale
5 Superior = Work performance is
Rating Performance MEASURING PERFORMANCE
5. Superior Work performance is consistently superior to standards for the job
4. More than Satisfactory = Work performance is consistently above the standard performance for the position
3. Satisfactory = Meets standards
2. Improvement Needed = Does not consistently meet standard
1. Unsatisfactory = Inadequate and inferior to standards of performance
Click NEXT to continue
If this is “Satisfactory”… What is “Superior” or “More Then Satisfactory”?
• In all categories where has the employee gone
Rating Performance MEASURING PERFORMANCE
In all categories, where has the employee gone above and beyond his or her job description?
Efficiency/Productivity
• Where are they compared to the lab standard? This should be hard data collected over time, not comparisons to other employees.
• Work with the employee to document specific instances
Click NEXT to continue
16
Mark is Histology technologist who has worked a private clinic for 3 years as a Histology technician but only 1 year as an technologist. Ellen has supervised
LEARNING ACTIVITY
Measuring Performance
Mark for 9 months after he switched from a evening schedule to a day schedule. She has met with Mark quarterly to discuss his performance on the job. Ellen reviews her notes of his performance over the last nine months.
Select the next to view notes about John’s performance.
Click NEXT to continue
What overall in-progress rating should Ellen provide Mark? 5 4 3 2 1
Explain your answerMark is a “solid performer”. He is always on time to work and dresses in a professional manner.
LEARNING ACTIVITY
Measuring Performance
pHe consistently meets performance expectations; and has surpassed expectations a couple of times when performing diagnostic tests and procedures.
His work can be described as good quality in all significant areas of responsibility. He has the neatest handwriting of any of the staff. All his reports and documentation are easy to read. He is supportive and responsive to customers; has applied basic C.A.R.E. standards. His overall performance is in line with his peer group with the exception of his neat handwriting. He completed one formal training course this year on Animal safet
<Click here to enter your response>
Animal safety.
Submit
17
Jane is a Cytology Technologist. Jane as worked at the hospital for 1 year. Martin hired Jane and have supervised her for all 12 months. He has
LEARNING ACTIVITY
Measuring Performance
met with Jane quarterly to discuss her performance on the job.
Select the next button to view notes about Jane’s performance.
Click NEXT to continue
What overall in-progress rating should Martin provide Jane? 5 4 3 2 1
Why?
Jane started out somewhat slower then her peers but mastered her job skills quickly (3-4 months). She has learned to implement the more technical
d ( i lid ith ffi i i
LEARNING ACTIVITY
Measuring Performance
<Click here to enter your response>
procedures (scanning slides with efficiency, using the automatic scanners) and doesn’t complain when she has to pick up extra cases. Jane comes to work generally on time, however, she has been late to work 6-times due to the fact one or more of her three kids had the flu.
Her work can be described as consistently excellent quality in all significant areas of responsibility. She is supportive and responsive to requests from her Supervisor (she has taken on many data entry projects for the department). She has enthusiastically applied basic C.A.R.E. standards.
Submit
y ppShe is one of the better performers on her peer team. She has participated in on-the-job training as needed and appears to have a natural talent for learning things quickly.
18
COMMON ERRORS
Matt, you are a great worker, but I really wish you could be as efficient at responding to department
inquiries as Mary is. She gets out twice the amount of work that you do in the same amount
of time.
Why are you always comparing me to someone else? I work really hard and you don’t
appreciate me. Brian does less work than me and you never talk to him.
Scenario
Click NEXT to continue
Contrast Effect
First Impression
ErrorStereotyping
Select each button on the diagram to review a description and questions to assess potential performance gaps in
each area.
Common Errors
Common Appraisal
Errors
Halo/Horns Effect
Similar-to-Attribution
Recency Effect
me Effect
Central tendency
Negative and
Positive Skew
Bias
Click NEXT to continue
19
Tendency to evaluate an employee in comparison with other employees rather than against the standards/ performance expectations of the position.
Contrast Effect COMMON ERRORS
Click HERE to return to previous menu
Tendency to make an initial positive or negative judgment of an employee and allow that first impression to color or distort later information
COMMON ERRORSFirst Impressions
Click HERE to return to previous menu
20
Inappropriate generalizations from one aspect of an individual’s performance to all areas of that person’s performance
COMMON ERRORSHorn or Halo Effect
Click HERE to return to previous menu
Tendency of managers to rate people who resemble themselves more highly than they rate others.
COMMON ERRORSSimilar to Me Effect
Click HERE to return to previous menu
21
The inclination to rate people in the middle of the scale even when their performance clearly warrants a substantially higher or lower rating.
COMMON ERRORSCentral Tendency
Click HERE to return to previous menu
The opposite of central tendency, this is the rating of all individuals as higher or lower than their performance actually warrants.
COMMON ERRORS
Negative andPositive Skew
Click HERE to return to previous menu
22
The tendency to attribute performance failing to factors under the control of the individual and performance successes to external causes.
COMMON ERRORSAttribution Bias
Click HERE to return to previous menu
The tendency of minor recent events to have more influence on the performance rating than major events of many months ago.
COMMON ERRORSRecency Effect
Click HERE to return to previous menu
23
The tendency to generalize across groups and ignore individual differences.
COMMON ERRORSStereotyping
Click HERE to return to previous menu
COMMON ERRORSMultiple Choice
Scenario
It is time for June’s annual evaluation. Ellen knows in this past year June has gone through some tough times- a divorce and both of her parents passed away. Ellen just went through a similar situation so she should:
a. Give her a break. Ellen knows her performance has been suffering but she know what she is going through
b. Evaluate her on the same data scale that she evaluates everyone else on
c. Evaluate her on the data scale as she evaluates everyone else on and offer support and mentorship to get through it
went through a similar situation, so she should:
Click HERE to the 4 Keys Menu
d. Put off her evaluation until her feels better
24
MEETING WITH THE EMPLOYEEBest Practices
Say Thanks
Thank employees for their service and contribution to the team
Relax
The performance review is an opportunity to develop their potential
Explain
Exchange assessments. Provide concrete examples of performance and specific documentation of behaviors.
Cooperate
Be open to differences of opinion and reconcile differences where possible
Best Practices MEETING WITH THE EMPLOYEE
Create a Performance Plan
Identify and plan opportunities for f t d l tfuture development
Listen
Give employees a chance to determine ways they can improve and specific measures
Agree and Document
Document your agreement and allow for feedback
25
Multiple Choice MEETING WITH THE EMPLOYEE
Scenario
Amy has left the her supervisor Julie’s office in tears following her annual review. She thinks she was unfairly rated. She was never made aware of many things that were brought up as performance issues, nor was she given the chance to
What should Julie do?
a. Sign off and turn in the review; she will get over it.
b. Do not change anything on her review, but, give her a few days to think about it and reschedule a time to talk more.
c Let her write her own review Julie brought up many issues that she should
that were brought up as performance issues, nor was she given the chance to address them.
Click HERE to the 4 Keys Menu
c. Let her write her own review. Julie brought up many issues that she should have talked to her about before but never had the chance until now.
d. Review the evaluation together, being open to possible changes if merited by documentation.
CONCLUSION
“Don't lower your expectations to meet your performance. Raise your level of performance to meet your expectations. Expect the best of yourself, and then do what is necessary to make it a reality.”- Ralph Marston¹
26
1‐Marston R. Brainy Quote web site. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/r/ralphmarst125719.html. Accessed May 15, 2013.
Reference
You have successful completed the online learning course:
Appraising Employee Performance
CONCLUSIONCompletion Requirements
Credit is awarded upon successful completion of the post-test.Access the post-test by exiting the course and returning to the course content page.
Click the link Post-Test to take the exam. You must score 80% in three attempts for credit to be awarded.
Interested in applying these best practices on the job? You can download LMU Educational Tools and Resources from your Learning Plan in LMUyour Learning Plan in LMU.
Please join the discussion in the Lab Management University online communities of practice. The more you participate and share, the more everyone can benefit including you and your team.
Click NEXT to continue