+ All Categories
Home > Business > Appraising Performance

Appraising Performance

Date post: 22-Jan-2015
Category:
Upload: satyam-mishra
View: 993 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
Popular Tags:
38
Appraising Performance: Strategies and Lessons Learned Wendy K. Soo Hoo, Assistant City Auditor City of Seattle November 2004
Transcript
Page 1: Appraising Performance

Appraising Performance: Strategies and Lessons Learned

Wendy K. Soo Hoo, Assistant City AuditorCity of Seattle

November 2004

Page 2: Appraising Performance

2

Agenda

What the Experts Say About Performance Appraisals

What Do You Think? Performance Appraisals Versus Performance

Management… and Other New Practices Conducting Effective Meetings About

Performance (and Other Difficult Conversations)

Page 3: Appraising Performance

3

What the Experts Say About Performance Appraisals

Page 4: Appraising Performance

4

Performance Appraisal Definition

A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS:

One of those special human encounters where the manager gets no sleep the night before, and the employee gets no sleep the night after.

—Thomas B. Wilson

Page 5: Appraising Performance

5

Overarching Goal

• To create and promote a workforce that can achieve the organization’s mission to provide the most value to its stakeholders

Page 6: Appraising Performance

6

Elements of Traditional Appraisals

• Goal Setting—Supervisors set performance objectives or standards for individual employees;

• Measures—Tasks or levels of performance are used to gauge whether person has achieved his/her goals;

• Feedback—Comparison of performance to goals is usually provided at end of performance period;

• Performance Rating—Supervisor judges overall performance and gives numeric rating;

• Merit Pay—Pay increase based on performance rating and market price for position.

Page 7: Appraising Performance

7

Performance Appraisals in Your Organization

• Are managers in your organization required to conduct performance appraisals?

1 = Yes 2 = No

• Do you give performance appraisals, do you receive a performance appraisal, or both?

1 = Give Appraisal 2 = Receive 3 = Both

Page 8: Appraising Performance

8

Appraisal Process Objectives

• Managers: Recognize and reward top performers.• Employees: Obtain honest, timely feedback,

development and coaching.• Compensation Managers: Ensure that dollars

allocated according to performance.• Human Resource Executives: Identify top

performers and plan for their development and succession.

Page 9: Appraising Performance

9

What’s Wrong With This Picture?

• Managers are usually uncomfortable with appraisal process.

• Employees are not happy with the assessment of their performance.

• Most organizations (90%) do not consider performance appraisals to be effective.

Page 10: Appraising Performance

10

• Appraisal process can effectively serve several functions

• One-size-fits-all works well for supervisors and employees

• Ratings are motivating

• People withhold effort without incentives

• Often one function undercuts the other (e.g., employees focus on pay)

• Different preferences in coaching, receiving feedback

• Ratings don’t provide useful information and can be demoralizing

• People are intrinsically motivated to perform well when work is meaningful

Myths Reality

Page 11: Appraising Performance

11

Why Appraisal Processes Often Fail• Appraisal process only operates for part of the year—

not meaningful if goals are not monitored.• Ratings are based on managers’ opinions, only

include what managers remember.• Managers avoid honest feedback to prevent conflict.• Organizations try to meet too many objectives

(feedback, development, pay raises, etc.). • Employees believe criteria are vague, subjective; can

be demoralized by ratings, especially when pay is involved……

Page 12: Appraising Performance

12

Linking Pay to Appraisals—A Good Idea?

• At least two dozen studies over the last three decades conclusively documented that people who expect a reward for completing a task, or for doing that task successfully, simply do not perform as well as those who expect no reward at all.

—Harry Levinson

Page 13: Appraising Performance

13

Rewards or Punishment?

• Pay is not a motivator, but it can be a de-motivator when it is inequitable

• Rewards can create conflict between managers and staff, or among staff members

• Rewards undermine interest because artificial incentive cannot match intrinsic motivation

Page 14: Appraising Performance

14

Merit Pay Increases and Performance Appraisals

• Should merit pay increases be included in the performance appraisal process?

• If the purpose is to provide feedback, encourage development, probably not.

• If the purpose is to reward the individual—maybe.

• Merit pay increase should be given when individual shows new capabilities over a sustained period, rather than end-of-the-year appraisal.

Page 15: Appraising Performance

15

Remember Myers-Briggs

Anyone who supervises someone else should:

• Look carefully at the assumptions made about motivation.

• Assess the degree to which carrot-and-stick assumptions influence own attitudes.

—Harry Levinson

Page 16: Appraising Performance

16

What Do You Think?

• On a scale of 1 to 5, what do you think of the performance appraisal process?1 = Performance appraisals always meet these objectives.2 = They meet some of these objectives.3 = They are a necessary evil.4 = They could/should be improved if we continue to use them.5 = Performance appraisals should be eliminated altogether.

Page 17: Appraising Performance

17

What Do You Think?

• Do appraisals encourage you to work harder?

1 = Yes, I work harder because of the appraisals.2 = Yes… at least for the the month before or after my appraisal.3 = No, my effort would have been the same with

or without an appraisal.4 = No, I find performance appraisals discouraging and ineffective, which impacts my work effort.

Page 18: Appraising Performance

So What Do We Do Instead?

Performance Management and Other New Practices

Page 19: Appraising Performance

19

Typical Process Ideal Process

Highly subjective

Unilateral (only from the manager’s perspective)

Little focus on future capacity

Uncertain link to business success drivers

Explicitly defined

Mutually understood, with multilateral communication

Strong development focus

Grounded in business success drivers

Page 20: Appraising Performance

20

SMART

• Specific—Goals and criteria should be clearly defined;

• Meaningful—Evaluation process should impact behavior;

• Achievable—Goals should be realistic; process should provide incentive to perform beyond expectations;

• Reliable—Process should achieve desired objectives;

• Timely—Performance reviews and feedback should occur more frequently than once each year.

Page 21: Appraising Performance

21

Performance Management

• Performance management is the process of creating a work environment in which people are enabled to perform to best of their abilities.

• Begins when a job is defined and ends when the employee leaves your organization.

Page 22: Appraising Performance

22

Performance Managementat the Organization Level

• Clearly define and communicate the organization’s mission, strategies, and performance goals.

• Provide appropriate training for managers on giving feedback.

• Ensure employees receive ongoing feedback and appropriate training.

• Align job descriptions with organizational goals.• Conduct exit interviews to understand why valued

employees leave the organization.

Page 23: Appraising Performance

23

Performance Managementat the Manager Level

• Involve employees in goal-setting process; goals should be flexible enough to reflect changing workplace conditions.

• Clearly articulate performance metrics used to measure employee’s success in meeting agreed-upon goals.

• Provide training to employees to strengthen performance and advance career.

• Provide ongoing “on the job” feedback.

Page 24: Appraising Performance

24

Performance Managementat the Employee Level

• Develop performance goals with his/her manager.• View manager as a coach or mentor rather than

someone who passes judgment.• Be receptive to feedback.• Don’t rely on manager to provide all the feedback

—employee is also responsible for providing information on his/her performance.

Page 25: Appraising Performance

25

Other New Approaches

• Evaluations in new systems are not conducted for raises, promotions, or bonuses—instead for development and communication.

• Most important aspect in all is multilateral communication between employee, managers, and others, rather than one-way communication.

Page 26: Appraising Performance

26

Examples

• Pass/fail systems or no ratings at all

• Peer reviews

• Self-reviews

• Upward assessments

• 360-degree feedback

Page 27: Appraising Performance

27

Owning the Solution

If people do not participate in and “own” the solution to the problems or agree to the decision, implementation will be halfhearted at best, probably misunderstood, and more likely than not fail.

—Michael Doyle in forward to Kaner, Sam Facilitator’s Guide to Participatory Decision Making New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC 1996

Page 28: Appraising Performance

28

Recapping the Key Points

Expectations should be linked to business objectives;

Performance goals should be established; People should be coached, mentored—

employees should be motivated; and Assessments relying solely on supervisor’s

perspective will have limited value.

Page 29: Appraising Performance

29

Are You Using Any New Techniques?

1 = Yes, and it’s more effective than the traditional appraisal process.

2 = Yes, we’re still evaluating the effectiveness.

3 = Not yet, but we’re thinking about it…

4 = No, we’ll probably always use the traditional appraisal process.

Page 30: Appraising Performance

Dealing With Difficult Conversations

Page 31: Appraising Performance

31

Four Stages of Difficult Conversations

1) Prepare

2) Initiate conversation

3) Explore their story, then yours

4) Collaborate on resolution

Page 32: Appraising Performance

32

Stage 1: Prepare

• Consider your objectives and approach• Conduct research—if you’re the manager, review

the employee’s file, outline some topics and talking points, do a mental walk-through.

• Employee should consider their performance as well and prepare notes or jot down concerns and questions.

• Be open to multiple perspectives• Adopt a positive mindset (see next slide)

Page 33: Appraising Performance

33

Choose a Positive Context

• When a conflict is framed in a negative context, the focus is on power, and will likely result in a winner and a loser.

• Focusing on improvements instead of mistakes can defuse the tension.

Page 34: Appraising Performance

34

Stage 2: Initiate Conversation

• Invite conversation and share your purpose• Key practice: describe the issue/problem as

a difference in perspective• Avoid problem solving during initial stage

of conversation• Acknowledge feelings, which are frequently

core issues, before attempting to solve stated problems

Page 35: Appraising Performance

35

Stage 3: Get Their Story-- Then Tell Them Yours

• Start with their story

• Don’t assume that you know their story

• Don’t push back—Listening does not imply agreement

• Express your views and feelings after their story is finished

Page 36: Appraising Performance

36

Your Story

• Start with the most important points• State what you mean clearly to avoid

assumptions• Share how you formed conclusions• Avoid words like “never” or “always” or

“fault”• Present your story as “your truth” not “the

truth”

Page 37: Appraising Performance

37

Stage 4: Collaborate on Resolution

• Invite the other person to help identify solutions • Invite the other person to come back if attempted

resolution is not successful• Remain hopeful that mutually acceptable solution

is possible• Recap major points, be sure to end on encouraging

note

Page 38: Appraising Performance

38

Key Sources

Wilson, Thomas B. Innovative Reward Systems For the Changing Workplace, McGraw-Hill, New York 1994.

Flannery, Thomas P., et. al., People, Performance, and Pay, The Free Press, New York 1996.

Various articles published on human resource websites


Recommended