+ All Categories
Home > Documents > APPROACHES TO PULMONARY IBROSIS - RCP London

APPROACHES TO PULMONARY IBROSIS - RCP London

Date post: 19-Mar-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
48
NOVEL APPROACHES TO PULMONARY FIBROSIS Gisli Jenkins FRCP PhD Professor of Experimental Medicine University of Nottingham
Transcript

NOVEL APPROACHES TO PULMONARY FIBROSIS

Gisli Jenkins FRCP PhD Professor of Experimental Medicine

University of Nottingham

OVERVIEW

Review of ILDs What is pulmonary

fibrosis? How should IPF be

diagnosed? How should IPF be

treated? Is personalised therapy

for IPF possible?

ILD OLYMPICS

IPF Sarcoidosis

Asbestosis CTD

HSP Drugs

NSIP

The rest

ILD OLYMPICS

NSIP

IPF

Sarcoidosis

Asbestosis HSP

CTD

Drugs The rest

RA

ILD OLYMPICS

Fibrotic

Granulomatous

Inflammatory

CHRONIC PROGRESSIVE FIBROTIC LUNG DISEASE OR INFLAMMATORY INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE

Fibrotic IPF Fibrotic HSP Rheumatoid -UIP Asbestosis IPPFE

Inflammatory Sarcoid CTD-ILD HSP NSIP DIP RBILD LIP

DEFINITELY NOT IPF Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Metzger F et al. Chest 2010;138:724-726 ©2010 by American College of Chest Physicians

Sarcoid

NOT IPF AT THE MOMENT

NSIP

Marten al Eur Radiol 2009;19:1679-1685

ANA α-dsDNA Ribonucleoproteins

α-Ro and α-La (Sjogrens) α-Smith (SLE) α-Ro52 (none-specific)

α-Topoisomerase/Scl70 (SSc) α-PM/Scl (SSc/PM overlap) α-tRNA synthetases (PDM)

Jo-1 PL-7 PL-12

α-MDA5 (CADM) α-IgG4 (IG4RD) RA and α−CCP (RA) -UIP MPO (Vasculitis) -UIP

MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL VERSUS ORAL CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IN SCLERODERMA-RELATED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE (SLS II):A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PARALLEL GROUP TRIAL

Donald P Tashkin, Michael D Roth, Philip J Clements, Daniel E Furst, Dinesh Khanna, Eric C Kleerup, Jonathan Goldin, Edgar Arriola, Elizabeth R Volkmann, Suzanne Kafaja, Richard Silver, Virginia Steen, Charlie Strange, Robert Wise, Fredrick Wigley, Maureen Mayes, David J Riley, Sabiha Hussain, Shervin Assassi, Vivien M Hsu, Bela Patel, Kristine Phillips, Fernando Martinez, Jeff rey Golden, M Kari Connolly, John Varga, Jane Dematte, Monique E Hinchcliff , Aryeh Fischer, Jeff rey Swigris, Richard Meehan, Arthur Theodore, Robert Simms, Suncica Volkov, Dean E Schraufnagel, Mary Beth Scholand, Tracy Frech, Jerry A Molitor, Kristin Highland, Charles A Read, Marvin J Fritzler, Grace Hyun J Kim, Chi-Hong Tseng, Robert M Elashoff , for the Sclerodema Lung Study II Investigators*

www.thelancet.com/respiratory Published online July 25, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30152-7

MIGHT BE IPF

Hunninghake et al NEJM 2013

DO INTERSTITIAL LUNG ABNORMALITIES REPRESENT EARLY PULMONARY FIBROSIS?

Putman et al JAMA 2016

IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSIS

Elderly male ex-smokers Usually 2 year history of:

Progressive shortness of breath on exertion

Dry non productive cough On examination

Bilateral Basal Crepitations Clubbed

IPF IS A PROGRESSIVE DISEASE

Elicker et al Resp Med 2010 Interstitial Lung Diseases Unit

MORTALITY FROM IPF IN THE UK HAS INCREASED IN THE LAST 40 YEARS

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

1968

19

69

1970

19

71

1972

19

73

1974

19

75

1976

19

77

1978

19

79

1980

19

81

1982

19

83

1984

19

85

1986

19

87

1988

19

89

1990

19

91

1992

19

93

1994

19

95

1996

19

97

1998

19

99

2000

20

01

2002

20

03

2004

20

05

2006

20

07

2008

ICD-9 (1979)

ICD-10 (2000)

Navaratnam Thorax. 2011;66(6):462-7.

Vancheri ERJ 2010 35(3):496-504

.

5 year survival rates from IPF compared with various cancers.

CAUSES OF IPF

Idiopathic (and cryptogenic) means “we don’t know”

Genetics responsible for about 30%

Other hypotheses include: Viral infection Gastro-Oesophageal

Reflux Disease Inhaled dust/smoke

A POLYMORPHISM IN THE COMMON VARIANT OF MUC5B PROMOTES SUSCEPTIBILITY TO IPF

Fingerlin et al Nat Genet 2013

RARE VARIANTS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH FAMILIAL PULMONARY FIBROSIS

Telomerase TERT, TERC DKC1, PARN, NAF1 RTEL1, TINF2

Epithelial Cell Function SFTPA1 SFPTA2 SFPTC ABC3

6% patients in UK with IPF have 1° relative Currently we do not recommend genetic

screening These patients are eligible for 100k Genome

Project

DIAGNOSING IPF

HRCT Reticulation Honeycombing Traction

Basal Peripheral Subpleural

(ATS/ERS Criteria AJRCCM 2011)

LUNG FUNCTION

SHOULD VATS BIOPSIES BE PERFORMED? Leads to acute excarbations Mortality rate between 1.7-

2.4% Hutchinson et al Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016, Hutchinson Eur Respir J 2016

Ventilation promotes TGFβ activation in the lung. Jenkins et al JCI 2006, John et al Science Signalling 2016

Mechanical stretch of IPF tissue has enhanced TGFβ activation. Froese et al Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016

IPF MANAGEMENT

NICE IPF Guidelines (CG163) Put the MDT at the heart of management

NICE IPF Quality Standard (QS79) Patients should be diagnosed with IPF by MDT All patients should have access to a Specialist Nurse Should have ambulatory Oxygen assessments Should have access to Pulmonary Rehabilitation Should have access to Palliative Care

2 NICE approved drugs for IPF Pirfenidone (TA282) Nintedanib (TA379)

THE PANTHER STUDY

Triple therapy with Pred/AZA/NAC for IPF had significantly worse outcome compared with placebo. Death 8 vs 1 p < 0.01 Hospitalisation 23 vs 7 p < 0.001

Single agent NAC no benefit compared with placebo

Raghu et al N Eng J Med 2012 Martinez et al N Eng J Med 2014

DISEASE MODIFYING ANTIFIBROTIC DRUGS

Richeldi et al NEJM 2014 King et al NEJM 2014

Pirfenidone Nintedanib

BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE

Co-morbidities Withdraw ineffective or harmful

therapies Symptom relief

Dyspnoea Oxygen

Cough PPI Prednisolone Thalidomide Opiates

THERE IS STILL CONSIDERABLE PROGRESS NEEDED

Strict prescribing criteria for anti-fibrotic therapy IPF only FVC 80-50% Responders only

Large number of adverse effects Mechanism of action unclear

SAME DISEASE DIFFERENT COURSE

Adapted from Ley B et al, Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011

Time

Dise

ase

Prog

ress

ion

1 yr 2 yr 3 yr 4 yr 5 yr 6 yr

Onset of Disease

Onset of Symptoms

Diagnosis

Death

Sub-clinical Period

Pre-diagnosis Period

Post-diagnosis Period

A B C D

SAME RADIOLOGICAL APPEARANCE DIFFERENT DISEASE?

Walsh et al Thorax 2014;69:216-222

RA-ILD IPF

ARE CURRENT CLINICAL STRATA OF FIBROTIC LUNG DISEASE FIT FOR PURPOSE?

Ryerson et al ERJ 2013 Kim et al. Chest. 2009

Protein MMP7/ SpD Matrix Neoepitopes

Lung Tissue Integrins

Transcript

Genome muc5B Cla

ssic

al IP

F

Atyp

ical

IPF

IPF

+ Em

phys

ema

IPF

+ as

best

os e

xpos

ure

IPF

+ R

A

Acce

lera

ted

IPF

MicroRNA mir29

IPF

+ Pu

lmon

ary

Hyp

erte

nsio

n

IPF

+ Lu

ng C

ance

r

Can Pulmonary Fibrosis be stratified?

Therapy In

ters

titia

l Lun

g Ab

norm

aliti

es

Noth et al Lancet Resp Med 2013

Peljto et al JAMA 2013

MUC5B AND TOLLIP POLYMORPHISMS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH SLOWER PROGRESSION OF IPF

SERUM BIOMARKERS MAY BE USEFUL IN SCREENING EARLY DISEASE

Kropski et al Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015

MMP7 SpD

CAN IPF BE STRATIFIED BY RESPONSE TO THERAPY?

Responders vs Non-responder The challenge in IPF is defining ‘treatment response’ We currently use >10% absolute drop in FVC We need more dynamic markers of disease which better

reflect disease biology

THE PROFILE STUDY

MATRIX NEOEPITOPES

Karsdal MA et al Assay Drug Dev Technol 2013

MATRIX NEOEPITOPES CAN DISTINGUISH PROGRESSIVE FROM STABLE IPF

Jenkins et al Lancet Respir Med 2015

PATIENTS WITH RISING MATRIX NEOEPITOPES HAVE INCREASED RISK OF MORTALITY

Jenkins et al Lancet Respir Med 2015

HIGHER RATE OF CHANGE OF MATRIX NEOEPITOPES IS ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RISK OF DEATH IN PATIENTS WITH IPF

Jenkins et al Lancet Respir Med 2015

CAN WE IDENTIFY MOLECULAR ENDOTYPES OF PULMONARY FIBROSIS

Identify a subset of pulmonary fibrosis with a specific behaviour

Conserved across clinical phenotypes Targetable by specific therapies Identified by specific biomarkers

TGFβ1 αvβ6 integrin

P

Gq

RhoA ROCK

P 3

P 3

αv integrin

X

X

P

4 3 ELK1 X

X

Jenkins et al J Clin Invest 2006 Xu et al Am J Pathol 2009 Henderson et al Nat Med 2013 Tatler et al J Biol Chem 2016 Tatler et al Plos One 2016 John et al Science Signalling 2016

THE αVβ6 INTEGRIN IS UPREGULATED IN REGIONS OF FIBROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH UIP

Xu et al Am J Pathol 2009

HIGH LEVELS OF β6 IMMUNOSTAINING ARE ASSOCIATED WITH A WORSE PROGNOSIS

Saini et al Eur Resp J 2015

Bleomycin + anti-αvβ6

bleomycin saline

Binding of 111In-DTPA-A20FMDV2 (β6 specific peptide)

αvβ6 Specific peptide

Control peptide

saline bleo

John et al J Nuc Med 2013

THE αvβ6 INTEGRIN IS UPREGULATED FOLLOWING BLEOMYCIN INDUCED LUNG INJURY

A β6 TARGETING PEPTIDE CO-LOCALISES WITH AREAS OF FIBROSIS FOLLOWING BLEOMYCIN INSTILLATION

John et al J Nuc Med 2013

CONCLUSIONS 1

ILDs should be considered inflammatory or fibrotic

Inflammatory ILDs can be treated with steroids and immunosuppression

Fibrotic ILD should NOT be treated with steroids and immunosuppression

CONCLUSIONS 2 Genetics plays a key role in IPF and patients with

affected 1° relatives are eligible for 100k genome project

The Disease Modifying Anti-fibrotic Drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib slow disease progression but do not cure IPF

Serum biomarkers may play a role in monitoring disease progression or therapeutic response

Understanding specific endotypes of disease and developing appropriate therapeutics and companion biomarkers will help the majority of patients who are ineligible, intolerant or unresponsive to current therapy

THE PULMONARY FIBROSIS GROUP

Acknowledgements Nottingham Richard Hubbard Simon Johnson Alan Knox Ian Hall Ian Sayers Imperial Toby Maher Leicester Martin Tobin Louise Wain Richard Allen Queen Mary John Marshall

Edinburgh Nick Hirani Moira Whyte

William Wallace

Bristol Ann Millar Cambridge Helen Parfrey UCL Robin McAnulty Hull Simon Hart Biogen Idec Paul Wienreb

Shelia Violette GSK Richard Marshall Andy Blanchard Pauline Lukey


Recommended