7/30/2019 Apro Bullitin from april 1968

1/8

TIIE . P.R.l.BULLETIlITh e A. P. R. O. Bulletin is the official copyrighted pvblication of the Asirl Phenomenr Reserrch Org.niririon (A.P.R,O.),3910 E. Klcindale Road, Tucson, Arizone. an dir issued every othcr month lo members only. The Aerial Phenomm! ResearchOrgazinalion is a non-profif group dedicaied fo tho evcntu.l soluiion of thc myrtrryof th e unideniifid obiects which have been presenl in the :kies for hundredr of yer:. Inquiries regarding membenhip may ba madc to thr abova .ddres.

TUCSON,AR]ZONA _ MARCH.APR,IL95 5

TltE L0nlD[Lfl l ll l i lG"l lcl l lEllUFOsOverD. C.The Amateur Radio Magazine of March1965 carried a short mention of a recentreport of a total of L2 speedy discs flyingover Washington, D. C. It seemed on eworker in an office spotted the firstdiscs and alerted five fellow workers.They all stood and lvatched the first sixrvhich were shortly followed by a halfdozen more.The writer went on to saY that when

the observers notified a Washingtonpaper they got a big turn-down. Whena local TV Station interviewed one ofth e men, high government pressure wa sallegedly brought to bear an d th e other{ive observerswere told to be quiet aboutrvhat they sarv. Seems the building wasgovernnrent olvned an d th e windowstherefore government property an d sothe observers were looking at a classifiedsight.The Washington Post lor 13 JanuarY1965 carried an article which identifiedthe building involved as the lVlunitionsBuilding on 19th Street and ConstitutionAvenue N. W and said th e date of th eincident wa s 11 January 1965. It read:"According to Paul M. Dickey Jr. andEd Shad, who were two of a dozen ob'servers at the windows, there were 12to 15 white, oval-shaped objects movingin erratic courses about 12-15,000 eetabove Capitol Hill. And they were beingchased by tw o delta-winged je t planes.The sight was visible for several minutes,they said. The Defense Department,rvhich has been up to its ears in reportsof unidentified flying objects so longthat the things are now known by initials,UFO, said simply: "There was no suchincident; it just didn't happen." A spokes-man for military installations in theWashington area had the same comment.Nevertheless, Dickey and Shad and threeother Communications Specialists em-ployed by the Army-Sam Webb, JackMcBride and Sam Marrone-are convin-ced they saw rvhat they think they saw.They agreed on the shape and approxi-mate number of the discs and the factthat the things were speeding fasterthan the je t intercepters. They agree(See "D . C. " page 5)

UAO Phofogrophed feorlyln AuslrofioAn object described as a bright orangeglow with a "dent" on top and a "knot"on the bottom, has been photographedat sea by a ship's steward who is also anamateur photographer.Mr. Walter Jacobs. steward on thefreighter Iron Duke, said he saw the ob-ject soon after 10 p.m. on March 17, 1965,when he began to photograph a moon-cloud effect while at sea on the way toNewcastle.Astronomical experts in Adelaide havebeen unable to positively identify the ob-ject. Prolessor J. H. Carver, Professor ofPhysics at Adelaide University an d pa -tron of the Astronomical Societyof SouthAustralia, said on 4 April that the de-scribed behavior of the object wa s con-sistent with that of an aircraft equipedwith a very strong spotlight.An RAAF spokesman said that to hisknowledge there had been no Planesusing powerful spotlights in the area at

that time. Another expert said he thoughtthe object could only have been a satel-lite orbitting the earth and illuminatedby the moon.There was no information in the Mel-bourrie Herald article concerning the ex-ac t geographical location of the freighter.Neither did the article state whetherthe movies were black and white or incolor or still or moving pictures althoughthe articles seem to indicate the photosare color motion films.Rodor llFO "Disgnosed"

On 29 December1964 he Presswiresthroughout the U. S. buzzedwith a mo'mentous news that two radar opelatorsat Patuxent Naval Air Station in Mary'land had tracked two unidentified radarreturns 30 miles south of the base andtraveling at 4800miles per hour. Theyapproached he Base, executeda tightturn and disappeared rom the scopestill flying in formation.The exact dateis not known, but severaldays ater, theAF chargedwith investigatinghe report,said there was no object-no mystery-the "objects" r.l'ere false radar returns.''

On the 3rd of March 1965, 65-yearoldJohn Reeves of WeekiWachi Springs,Florida, walked into the office of RadioStation WWJB in Brooksville and told astrang story of his purported encounterwith a robotJike creature and its spaceship on the the preceding day. His story:At about 1:55 in the afternoon of theseeond,he was walking about 1 1/2 milesfrom his home when he saw "out on theflats" an unusual looking object. IIe ap-proached it via a circuitous route and

when about 150 feet from the object hestopped and just looked at it . Shortlyhe was startled to see in an area a smalldistance from the "craft", a spacesuitedfigure which came out of the brush andapproached the object. It had traversedabout half the tlistance between it s orig-inal position and the craft, when it stop-ped, turned, spotted Reeves and startedtoward him. It got to within 15 feet ofMr. Reeves, stopped, pulled a squarishblack object with rounded edges " out ofits left side", and held it at chin level.The object flashed, "like lightning atnight", aecording to Reeves, whereuponReeves turned and ran. In running heknocked his glasses off on a bush, stop-ped to get them and his hat fell off.Sitting there in a crouched position, helooked around and the "robot's" objectIlashed again. Then the creature turnedand walked back to the "saucer" andentered it. Shortly the object rose intothe sky at high speed and disappeared.IMPORTANT NOTICE

As of l July 1965, PRO'snew addresswill be 3910E. Kleindale Road,Tucson,Arizona. All communications houldbesent o that address.After the craft left, Reeves walkedover to the place where it had sat andfound four holeswhere he landing gearhad been,and two sheetsof kleenex-likepaper neatly iolded and lying on theground. He picked them up and tookthem home with him. He also notedan abundance f strange ootprints.(Seedrawingsand photos or gear m'prints, footprints andshapeof UFO).The "robot" describedby Reeveswas(See"Londtng",Page3)

7/30/2019 Apro Bullitin from april 1968

2/8

PAGE THEA. P. R.O. BUTTETIN MAnCH-APRII,965TheA. P. R. O. BULLEilN

Publisheil byIH E AERIALPHENOMENARESEARCHORGANIZATION3910 E. KleindaleRoadTucson, ArizonaCopyright 1965, Coral E. LorenzenEditor

Inftrm.lion lppclring in thlr bullcfi n may bo uredby olher UAO research periodicals providiog na mrn d rddreu cradil i! propcrly givcn to thir orgrni.rrf im rnd pcriodlol.[. J, Lore.zen Inlernational DirectoaA. E. &own. 8.S.E.8, -,-.-----,.-- Dirstot of RerearchJohn T. Hopf Photographic ConrultlnlCoral Lorenzen Ssretary and Ediloa

SPECIALREPRESENTATIVES(The following listed individuals part ici-paie in planning an d policy-making asStaff Members, in addit ion lo coordinai-ing investigat iveefforts in the areas ndi.cated following lheir names.)

Dr. Olavo T. Fontes,M.D... . . BrazilK.GostaRehn ------------,-----,---wedenGraham Conway -- __EaslernCanadaAime Michel ---- ,__-__---ranceHoracioGonzalesGauteaumeVenezuelaPeter E. Norris, L.L.D. ----- -AustraliaJun' lchi Takanashi __,- , -____-, ,apanJuan C. Remonda _,__.-- - - rgent inaSergio Robba _____-----_,._talyArisl. Mitropoulos _,-, GreeceRev. N. C. G. Crut fwel l ,New GuineaEduardoBuelte SpainNormanAlford . .- .--. New ZealandAust inByrne lrelandSPECIAL ONSULTANTProf. CharlesManey,-PhysicsALAMOCORDO PRINTINC CO

Fromfhe Direclor ToFherllembers:Elsewhere in this issue is the noticethat I have become the new Director ofAPRO. This change was indicated byseveral actors.To name a few-Mrs. Lor-enzen ha s had health problems recently,APRO's growing prest ige (and workload)were becoming a burden to her, and cir-cumstanceshave given me more time tospend on th e UF O problem.No policy changes are contemplatedat present. APRO will continue to oper-ate on the premise that the UFO mysterycon best be solved through the buildingof the scientif ic case. To this end wewill continue to compile a "sighting" cat-alog on which to base stat ist ical studieswhile remaining alert for that one con-clusive case which could just ify all ofou r efforts.I wil l continue in my posit ion at theKitt Peak Observatory since APRO can-not afford to pay a salary.And, lest therebe any doubt, le t me make it clear thatthe Observatory has no official interestconcerning UFOs and therefore does notendorse my position on the subject. Nei

ther do they oppose t. The att itude ofmy employer is simply that what a ma ndoes on his ow n time is his own business.Landing cases seem to be on the in-crease and the question always arises asto the best way to investigate hese cases.The question is not one that can be easi-Iv answered since each case presents it sow n special problems.Experience suggests, however, thatcertain equipment be available:1. A good camera.2. A geiger counter or scint i l lat ioncounter.3. A split- image transit .4. Plaster of paris kit .5. Containers for soil samples or otherresidue.6. A 50-foot tape measure and a short-er scale for small measurements.It is of prime importance, of course,that th e investigator know how to usethese devices when the opportunity a-rises.APRO members are encouraged toshow a cooperative attitude toward al llocal law enforcement officers and mili-tary investigators. Experience has shownthat a promise to share with them theresults of our investigation his usuallyelicited full cooperation from them, TheAir Force Investigators sent out by localbases are usually unbriefed and unin-formed (on UiOs) and appreciative ofany help given.Law enforcement officers can some-times be prevailed upon to "rope off"

landing sites and thus prevent curiosityseekers from destroying valuable phys-ical evidence. It should also be kept inmind that it is a scientific investigator'sjob to gather evidenee and ask the prop-er questions-not to make snap judge-ments.Witnesses with physical evidence suchas photographs or artifacts should be in-

formed of their r ights. Evidence of thissort cannot be appropriated by govern-ment oflicials without the consent of theowner.If a good "hardware" case occurs inyour vicinity, (i . e., one which seems topresent good physical evidence), do nothesitate to call this office for help. . . .L. J. Lorenzen.

Abou] fhe New DireciorMr, Lorenzen was born Leslie JamesLorenzen (called Jim by his friends andfamily) on 2 January 1922 n Grand Mea-dow, Minnesota. During his high schoolyears he taught himself bass viol andguitar with his eye on professional music.He graduated from High School at Elk-ton, Minnesota in 1938 at the age of 16.He was Salutatorian of his class.After High School he pursued his ca-reer as a musician in and around Austinand Rochester, Minnesota until Lg42when he moved to Los Angeles, Californ-ia . In November of that year he joinedthe U. S. Army Air Corps and took his(See "New Directot", page 5)

Mr. Lorenzen at Kitt Peak Obseruatorg wi,th the dome of the retnote"controlled tele-seope n the background,. The Comrnunication Sgstem through whilh o cam,putoroperd.tes this te|escope i.s one of Mr. Lorenzen's responsibilities. Hi.s uork atKitt Peak x not connected,wi,th UFO research in ang way.

7/30/2019 Apro Bullitin from april 1968

3/8

7/30/2019 Apro Bullitin from april 1968

4/8

PAGE 4 THEA. P. T. O. BUTTETIN ilARCH-APRlt, 965londing. . .

(Continued, lrom page 3)alphabet) used on the first page, only theletters D, E, C, and M were repeated onthe next page, and a considerable num-ber of new glyphs appeared on the sec-ond page-too many for the missing 7letters of the alphabet.

The two pages of "writing" seemed tohave been written rather than drawn,and the two pages appeared to have beenproduced by two different writers.One small paragraph in the AF's state-ment of the Reeves case was puzzlinl:"The Air Force concluded that it wasn'tfeasible to expend any more lunds toanalyze and decipher the second sheet."With th e code broken on 18 of th e 25letters of th e alphabet, it should havebeen comparatively easy and inexpensivetu solve the mystery of the second sheet-unless th e init ial breakdown didn'twc,rk on the second sheet. as we found

tc be the case.In the April-May issue of the NICAPInvestigator, it is stated on Page 8 col-umn two, under th e heading, "ReevesStory", that a NICAP Sun Coast Sub'committee interviewed Reevesbefore AFinvestigators. We ha d been assured byphone that outside of him and Fish, noon e had interviewed Reeves before th eAi r Force go t to him. I t is a mystery to uswhy any UF O Investigator would standidly by and let material evidence suchas the pieces of paper (there were two)ge t ou t of hi s hands.The Investigator also states that themessage on the paper read, in Part:"Planet Mars, where are you ?The actual message reads: "PlanetMars-are you coming home soon-wemiss you very much-why did you stayaway too long." This in th e interest ofaccuracy.Which brings up another point: Thereis a strange breakdown in the Englishof the l ast sentence of that "message".I t soundsas though someoneno t entirelyconversant with th e English languagewrote it .Johnson no w claims that th e paper re -

turned to Reeves by the AF is not thesame which Reevesgave them.Adding all these facts up , we cannotturn our backs on the two possibilities.1. That the whole incident is a hoax.If this is so, Reeves had help-possiblyhypnosis was used. Whoever participat-ed in the hoax, however, would have hadto have a very int imate knowledge ofUF O lore. Then we must search amongourselves.2. The whole incident was real andthe most important evidence-the paper

Tlte oborsescript on"strange paperu' was allegedly droyped by "space mnn" ituWeelci-Wachi, Spring s Incident.-was in part a hoax. This would be pos-sible if UFO occupants kept an easilytranslatable fake or cover message oldedin with any written matter in their pos-session to throw investigators off thetrack.or to label any inadvertent observ-ers of them or their craft as hoaxers.

The facts and the strange goings-on inFlorida indicate the former and it is theopinion of this office that this case can-not be called completely closed-not yet.The latest development in the Reeves'case is a polygraph test conducted by theEdwards Polygraph Service of Orlando,Florida, the results of which were kindly

forwarded to APRO by Mr. Robert S.Carr of Clearwater, who is awell-knownauthor and UFO researcher. We quotefrom the letter:"This Polygraph examination was con-ducted in the home of Mr. John F.Reeves, Brooksville, Florida on May 13,1965 at approximately 3:30 P.M. Therewere seven tests conducted in al l andtesting was terminated at approximately

5:15 P. M. The first three tests wereindoctrination tests to determine hisability of reacting to guilt deception. The

four following testswere conductedspe.cifcally on the main pertinent questonsregardinghis sightings."RESULTS:In my opinion, the indoc-trination tests reflected that he was anormal reactor and had guilt complexreaction when he attempted deception.It is my further opinion, hat after care-fu l examinationof the four separate estsin which the pertinent questionswereasked egarding the sightings, here wasno indication of any deception o any ofthe pertinent questionsasked."CONCLUSION: It is therefore myopinion, hat John F. Reeves as answer-

ed all pertinent questions ruthfully, re-garding the experiencehe had when ashe statedhe saw a UFO and oecupant nMarch 2, 1965at Brooksville,Florida. Afurther and most significantpoint of in-terest is at the conclusionof the tests,Mr. Reeves irst remarked: "now wouldyou like to see the plaee where I sawthe saucer?" The usual reaction of aguilty subjectwith respect o not answer-ing truthfully would have more likelybeen,"well, how did I makeout?" There(See Landing", page6)

7/30/2019 Apro Bullitin from april 1968

5/8

mARCH-APRI.,965 IHE A. P. R. O. BUI.IFTIN PAGE5NewDirector . . .

(Contiaueil from poge 2)basic training at Sioux Falls, South Da-kota where he turned down an opportun-ity for Officers CandidateSchool andArmy Intelligence. Ie explains:"I didn'twant to be a career soldier."In 1943a month after his marriage oCoralLightner (Mrs.L.), Jim wasassign-ed to the CBI theaterof operationswherehe served or 15 months as a llying radiooperatoron the India-China-BurmaOverthe Hump" run. He flew 624 operationalhours during that period and made 156flights over the "hump" (HimalayanMountains). Mr. Lorenzen received theAir Medalwith oak leaf cluster, he Dis-tinguished Flying Cross with oak leafcluster and the PresidentialUnit Cita-t ion.

Discharged from the Army in 1945,Lorenzen and his wife returned to LosAngeleswhere he re-entered he musicfield. For the next five yearshe workedas a guitarist and bassist n clubs andtheatres throughout California and Arizona.During that time he studiedStat is-tical Psychologyand Music Theory andElementary Psychologyat Arizona StateCollegeat Tempe,Arizona.In 1950 Mr. Lorenzen undertook tochangehis major profession nd attend-ed ElectronicsTechnical nstitute in LosAngeles. He received his First PhoneLicense hat year and went to work forLockheedAircraft Corporation. n 1952he and the family moved to SturgeonBay, Wisconsin where he worked as aradio engineerand announceror WDOR.He remained there until 1954when heacceptedemployment with Telecomput-ing Services t HollomanAir Force Base.After six years with T.S. he acceptedapositionwith Kitt PeakNatiooal Observ-atory, under AssociatedUniversities orResearchn Astronomy,where he is nowan electronicsengineer n the SpaceDi-vision.

Mr. Lorenzen's nterest in UFOs datesback to 194?when Mrs. L. observedaUFO in Douglas,Arizona. Both he andMrs. L. spent five years collecting andresearching nformation connectedwithLFOs before forming APROin 1952.Mr. and Mrs. Lorenzenhave two chil-dren, LeslieJaen19 (a girl) a Freshmanat the University of Arizona, and Larry,15, a Sophomore in High School inTucson.Mr. Lorenzenplans to begin manufac-turing one of his electronic inventionsin Tucson during the calendar year of1965.He also maintainshis skill as a pro-fessionalmusician by performing part.time at private partiesand socialgather-ing in the Tucsouarea.

Mr, Lorenzen,APRO'snew Director, andMrs. Lorenzen, n front of their homei,n Tucssn, Arizonn.

MysteryVaporTrailsThe Melbourne,Australia Herald of 15January 1965 carried an article aboutsevenunexplainedvapor trails observed250miles off the NewZealandCoastoverthe TasmanSeaat 6:45p.m. on the 13th(Wednesdayyof January. "The RAAF

has failed to identify flying objects re-ported over the TasmanSeaon Wednes-day night", the lead sentence ead.Captain D. Shannon and the crew ofhis Electra which was at 20,000 t. alti-tude reported seeing he trails at 35,000feet, going west to east. The trails"seemed o split", into seven directions,indicating a flight formation, Shannonreported.An RAAF spokesmann Canberrasaidno aircraft clearedofficially from Aus-tralia was n the areaat the time. Inquiryhad shown hat no aircraft authorized ooperate over or out of Australia could

have been n the area at the time. TheThe Australian radar station at Brook-vale had turned n no reportsof unidenti-fied objects.The initial story was sadly lacking indetail but it is indeed strange that anexperienced ilot would turn in a reporton such a mundane item as contrailswhen one would expecta pilot to expectto see contrails.Regardless, n the same day the Sydney Sun carried an explanation, o wit:

"Tbe RAAF now believes that vapor

trails seen by Qantaspilots (apparenilyothers besidesShannonobserved hem-Ed.) in the sky over Tasman were anatural phenomenon., a eantasofficialsaid that "the Electracrew sightedwhatappeared o be contrails from high-flyingplanes."Let us hope our Australian colleagueswere treated to a more detailed explana-tion-the planes shoulil havebeenidentified.Additional information reaching thisoffice indicates a radar confirmation ofthe sigbtingbut the locationof the radarwas not made explicit-it could havebeen radar contactby Sbannon's lane.The clippings which divulged his infor-mation did not specify.News sourcesalso said the report hadbeen officially explainedas "ice crystals"although two top-ranking RAAF officerssaid the evidence ndicateda formationof military aircraft capable of highspeeds nd ong-range erformance.

ProfessorReportsE-M PhenomensA University Professorat Victoria,B.C. , informs us that on Sunday,March? he drove from Vancouver o his homeat Victoria, B. C., and caught he 11p.m.ferry from Tsawwasseno SwartzBay.Fre drove down to Victoria from SwartzBay as usualwhen,on the last 100yardsbefore urning down he anewhich eadsto his home in the country, all of hisauto lites went out, and then came onagain.This happenedour times n quieksuccession,uring the spaceof some20or 30 yards.The next day he took his car in for acheck of the wiring and the mechanicsfound nothing. The Professor ater learn-ed from his Cello Instructor who alsolives in Victoria, that early in the morn.ing hours of Merch8th he wasawakenedby a high-pitched oisezooming ver hishouse at terrific speed.The instructordid not think it could have beenan air-craft.These might be consideredunrelatedincidentsandpossiblyhey are-but they

both indicate the presenceof unusualphenomenaoccuring n one areawithinhours.And both of the phenomena avebeen observedn conjunctionwith UAOphenomena.D.C.. . .(Continued rompage )that they saw a commercial ircraft nearthe flying things. An EasternAirlinesplane andedat NationalAirport at aboutthat time but Eastern reportedno un-identified objects."

7/30/2019 Apro Bullitin from april 1968

6/8

7/30/2019 Apro Bullitin from april 1968

7/8

MARCH-APR.II,,965 IHE A. P. R. O. EULLETIN PACE7lncidenl ln Ausfrotio

Officials Excited!A report forwarded by the VictorianFlying Saucer Research Society is mostinterestingalthough now a year old:"On May 3, 1964,an incident occurredwhich sent officials of the U.S.State De-partment to rush out reports to the CIA,the National SecurityAgency, he Nation-

al Aeronauticsand SpaceAdministration,and the Army and the Navy. The inci-dent was investigatedby the ScientilicAttache of the American Embassy t Can-berra, Dr. Paul Siple and two NASAengineers.Just before day near Canberra, large,white glowing object travelled across hesky in a northeastdirection. The objectwaswobblingandappeared o the observ-ers to be out of control. Nearby a small-er UFO hovered, showing a faint redlight. The large UFO moved in astraight line very fast for about fourseconds nd appeared o collide with thesmaller UFO. The impact seemed tocauseboth to bounce. There was no ex-plosion.The large UFO then turned, no longerwobbling, moved slowly away from thesmaller UFO, l,hen acceleratedaway ata very high speed.

LightsOyer ArkonsosAmateur Astronomerand APRO mem-ber Frank Hudson of Elkins, Arkansas,reports he following observation f UFOon the designateddates. He asks thatanyone who has information on similar

sightingsat thesespecificdatesand time,to get n touchwith APRO. Any possibleexplanationwill be appreciated."February 26, 1965:Time 7:10 CST.Weatherclear, wind calm. No moon. Iobserved n NE about 30 degrees romeastern horizon a light about the sizeof Echo 2. It was going faster than ajet and too slow for a meteor. It wasgoing south. The large light brightenedand dimmed about every four seconds.It was white. It dimmed out in the SE,about he same

7/30/2019 Apro Bullitin from april 1968

8/8

PAEE8 THEA. P. N. O. BUIIETIN mAncH-APntL,965In Briel:

Hanover, Mass.-Six men in a carpoolobserved a speedy, brilliant, pulsatingUFO at the intersection of Rt. 3 and 139in Hanover. It reversed its direction andcut across in front of their carTakamusu, Japan-Two civilian pilots re-ported being bnzzed by a UFO. The casewas reported to an Ai r Safety Officer inSouthwestJapan about the 13th of March,1965. One observer was the pilot of aConvair 2tt0 Airliner, the other piloteda Piper Apache. They agreed the objectwa s disc-shaped, bout 45 feet in diam-eter an d giving off a greenish glow. Itapproached their craft at an est imatedspeed of 20 miles per hour, turned ab -nrpt ly and f lew alongside them for threeminutes before accelerat ing and leavingthem behind. . . . . Woodlawn, Canada-On or about 16 }Iareh 1965 an oval ob-ject which appeared to have mult i-col-ored l ights an d a blue exhaustwa s report-ed by Ernest Dick of Woodlawn an dothers on the Eastern Seaboard. Piiotsoi 'er l laine (USA) also reported similarobject. . . . . Riverside, Calif .-On Janu-ary 14, 1965,a l4-year-old newsboy wh ois the son of an AF Major, reported a100-foot- long ootbal l shaped object inthe sky as he delivered papers in sorrth-east Rivers ide at about 5:30 a.m. Whenfirst seen, he object was stat ionary over-head-he est imated he alt i tude as about450 feet. He rode under it to deliver apaper. As he retraced his route, it madea "180 degree lurn" an d headed towardCorona at "3 t imes th e speed of a jet."The object was bri l l iant ly l ighted withfour red l ights showing. They did no tblink. I t made a slight "whining noise"-n o smoke or contrail. . . . . Gilroy, Calif .A number of County Park employees n-cluding To m Goold and his son observedan object "larger" than an aircraft andof a bluish translucent color. Goold re-ported the incident and said he spottedthe object over the Park's main off ice at4 p.m. when it "circled past" in an east-west direct ion. I t then seemed o halt inf l ight and made a right turn and proceed-ed into the south above he clouds. Gooldsaid his son observed a similar phenom-ena about 2 p.m. the same da y (2 8 De -cember 1964) while riding bikes on DayRoad and it appeared to be f lying overNIt. Madonna. Goold said i t didn't appearto be a weather balloon which ordinarilyf loats in one r l i rect ion. Kankakee,I l l inois. On 21 December 1964, t3-year-ol d John Phil l ip reported observing anoval, "shining bright" object f lyingacross the river at high speed at 3:10p.m. Montrose, Colorado-St. High-wa y Patrolman found the image of aUFO on f i lm exposed at 11 a. m. on 13December 1964.He was shooting pictures

of the Bureau of Reclamation OperationsOffice south of town. He first thoughtthe object was a speck of dust but byenlarging it 20 times he brought out aclear image of an object with "definitemarkings." Lindquist is mystified-sawnothing while taking photo. . . . London,Ontario, Canada-At 10 p. m. on 13 De-cember, 1964, 17-year-old Melvin Robert-son observed an oval-shaped object whichflew low from southeast to northwest.The object was bluish and gave of f red,wtite and biue smoke. The Control Towerat London Airport said nothing was ob-served there but did not scoff at thereport. Houston, B. C., Canada-At1:30 a. m. on 6 December 1964 wo mem-bers of the B. C. Forestry Service ob-served a dark object in the sky east ofI Iouston. They stopped their car an drvatched.The object is describedas being"darker than the sky", l i t up inside withth e light showing through in about fourplaces. The object made no noise, re -mained stat ionary. As the men go t ou tof the car for a better look the objectsimply disappeared.When they reportedtheir experience on th e Monday follow-ing. they were unaware that others onthe mainland ha d a similar experiencelpproximateiy an hour earlier. No fur-ther detai ls Longmont, Colorado-Deputy Serif f lValt Dunbar, r iding in anorthern direct ion rvith Mrs. Dunbar, at9:3? p.m. on 27 November 1964, saw abrit l iant white object travell ing about 20degrees above the horizon in the northan d which went from southwest o north-east in about 10 seconds.Just before itdisappeared,bright streaks shot out fromthe object 's sides diagonally to th e pathof f l ight. The object was also seen byDeputies Chuck Waneka and Hugo Zieg-lar, who were cruising in a patrol car.. . . Lolo, Montana-At 6:15 a.m. on 16November 1964,Jim Fisher, Service Sta-t ion operator, rvas opening his piace ofbusiness when he sa w a shimmeringcircle of l ight f lying noisiessly about 3miles west of Lolo. After f lying over theValley for several minutes th e objectveered sharply to the north. It had a lighton top similar to the light on top of apoliee car. . . . Concord, New Hampshire-O n January 24 , 1965, a man reportedthat the motor, l ights and radio of hi scar failed after a strange object makinga humming noise flew over Rt. 4A be-tween Wilmot and Enfield. In Manchest-er, M. Rybczyk reported his TV stoppedafter a "mystery object" with a hummingsound hovered over his house.ConnecliculHos JanuoryFIap

With all the other Easternstatesget-t ing t heir shareof UFOreports,Connecti-cut came nto he r own in late January,

1965. On Wedaesday, 20 January, Charl.es Clinsky, 15, of Hartford, reported heand friend William Ullman, saw a metal-lic-appearing disc like a "big nickel"over Avon Mountain at 5 p.m. They saidit made a high-pitched whistling soundand disappeared toward the Eastern hori-zon.A l0-year-old Glastonbury girl report-ed an "object like a soap dish on itsside" in the southwestern sky at 3 p.m.on the 20th. It had "flashing blue lights."At I p.m. that same night a Hartfordwoman and her two children saw a sauc.er-shaped object rimmed with blue lightin the southeast sky. The three sightingscomprise an almost straight line extend-ing northwest about 12 miles irom Glas-tonbury to West Hartford.

Aloslro Lighfs Stump AFOn the 27th of January, multlcolored,flickering lights mystified authorities atAnchorage, Alaska.One bright l ight hung due south of thecity, 30 to 40 degrees above the horizongrving of f a kaleidoscope glow through-out the night. The Air Force said it hadno explanation for the l ight.Three Professors at the Alaskanllethodist University studied the lightthrough a 100-power telescope and de-scribed it as smaller than Jupiter bu tmore brilliant. Dr. William C. Lang-worthy, Assistant Professor of Chemistryat AMU said, "It's odder than anythingI've seen before . . it's moving at thesame rate of speed as a star and it 's grot

on e of the planets."Several other "multi-colored, flicker-ing lights" were also seen. Langworthywas joined by Dr. Chang Kim and RossSchaff of the University. Conjecturesranged from a supernova or a large bal-loon-type satellite or a star-possiblyBetelguese. The Air Force claimed theirradars did not register the object.Bright Objecls OverNew Zeoland

A Grey Lynn man reported seing abright object in the southern sky nearthe southern cross at about 10:30 p. m.on 13 January 1965 He said the object"seemed hesitant in its movements" andhe "watched it for some time until itdisappeared."

A Glen Innes man also reported he anda friend had seen a bright object at12:30 a. m. while lishing near Rangitoto.It seemed to "detach itself from a 'star'before it hestitantly moved off towardthe sea."