10 440,276 157,483 47,429 12,462 248,350 Severity Number of sub-districts Total population People in Need IDPs Returnees In Besieged/ Militarily encircled locations In Hard-to-reach locations 0 0 0 0 0 0 m e l b o r p o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 m e l b o r p r o n i M 0 0 0 0 0 0 m e l b o r p e t a r e d o M 0 0 0 0 0 0 m e l b o r p r o j a M Severe problem 6 222,902 65,814 13,860 0 125,559 4 8 0 , 4 3 0 4 3 4 , 7 1 8 8 4 , 3 4 5 9 9 , 4 8 3 m e l b o r p l a c i t i r C Catastrophic problem 1 132,379 48,181 16,135 12,462 88,707 3. CONFLICT INCIDENTS Number of reported conflict incidents by type (from 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2017) HFA - Handheld fire arms; HWF - Heavy weapon fire; IED - Improvised explosive device 1. POPULATION CATEGORIES AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE: - 100 200 300 400 500 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 7 1 0 2 6 1 0 2 5 1 0 2 Airstrike HFA* HWF* IED*/Explosion ! P TURKEY Suluk Mansura Sabka Sarin Kisreh Ar-Raqqa Karama Ras Al Ain Sokhneh Ein Issa Jurneyyeh Al-Khafsa Menbij Maskana Tell Abiad As-Saan Al-Khafsa Abu Qalqal Jarablus Maadan Areesheh Al-Thawrah Al-Hasakeh AR-RAQQA Severity ranks No data 1 - Minor problem 2 - Moderate problem 3 - Major problem 4 - Severe problem 5 - Critical problem 6 - Catastrophic problem # * Besieged locations, Sep 2017 ! Military encircled locations, Sep 2017 2. SECTOR SEVERITY RANKING BY SUB-DISTRICT To be updated
Transcript
10 440,276 157,483 47,429 12,462 248,350
Severity Number of sub-districts Total population People in Need IDPs Returnees In Besieged/ Militarily
encircled locationsIn Hard-to-reach
locations
000000melborp oN
000000melborp roniM
000000melborp etaredoM
000000melborp rojaM
Severe problem 6 222,902 65,814 13,860 0 125,559
480,430434,71884,34599,483melborp lacitirC
Catastrophic problem 1 132,379 48,181 16,135 12,462 88,707
3. CONFLICT INCIDENTSNumber of reported conflict incidents by type (from 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2017)
HFA - Handheld fire arms; HWF - Heavy weapon fire; IED - Improvised explosive device
1. POPULATION CATEGORIESAR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE:
-
100
200
300
400
500
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
710261025102
Airstrike HFA* HWF* IED*/Explosion
!P
T U R K E Y
Suluk
MansuraSabka
Sarin
Kisreh
Ar-Raqqa
Karama
Tabni
Ras Al Ain
SokhnehDeir-ez-Zor
Ein Issa
Jurneyyeh
Al-Khafsa
Oqeirbat
Menbij
Maskana
Tell Abiad
As-Saan
Al-Khafsa
Ain al Arab
Abu Qalqal
JarablusLower Shyookh
Maadan
Areesheh
Al-Thawrah
Muhasan
Al-Hasakeh
AR-RAQQ A
Severity ranks
No data
1 - Minor problem
2 - Moderate problem
3 - Major problem
4 - Severe problem
5 - Critical problem
6 - Catastrophic problem
#* Besieged locations, Sep 2017
! Military encircled locations, Sep 2017
2. SECTOR SEVERITY RANKING BY SUB-DISTRICT
To be updated
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
4. PROTECTION ISSUES
a. Occurrence of protection issues
i. Analysis coverage (Number of communities covered in the analysis and number of those communities reporting occurrence of protection issues)
HIGHLIGHTS
ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting protection issues as occurring
*For explosive hazards indicator: this % applies to communities located in sub-districts where 99% of conflict incidents in the country, have taken place since January 2015.
99%
98%
97%
92%
85%
79%
74%
72%
70%
61%
61%
60%
60%
Lack/loss of civil documents
Housing/land/property issues
Early marriage
Family separation
Child recruitment
Explosive hazards*
Child labour preventing school attendance
Economic exploitation
Domestic violence
Kidnapping/Abduction
Sexual violence
Sexual harassment
Harassment
308 295 307 302 301 282
305 299 307 300 304 305 302 305288 298
279256
224 225 214 215184 186 184 182
0
336Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (at least sometimes) Total number of communities in the Governorate
• 313 communities were covered in Ar-Raqqa governorate with one or more protection issues.• 99% of covered communities reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring, 98% of covered communities reported housing, land and property
issues as occurring and 97% of covered communities reported early marriage as occurring.• Across population groups, 54% of covered communities described lack/loss of civil documentation as “very common” for one or more population
group, 23% of covered communities described housing, land and property issues as “very common” for one or more population group and 23% of covered communities described early marriage as “very common” for one or more population group.
• Adolescent girls are particularly affected by lack/loss of civil documentation with 30% of covered communities describing it as “very common” for this population group, as well as by early marriage with 16% of covered communities describing it as “very common” for this population group.
• 40% of covered communities described “restricting movement of women and girls” as a “commonly used” coping mechanism by one or more population groups.
• 38% of covered communities identified relying on humanitarian assistance as a coping mechanism that was “commonly used” by one or more population groups.
• Movement restrictions were reported as occurring in 85% of covered communities. Out of those, all reasons for movement restrictions score high, with 100% covered communities reporting screening processes and rules imposed by concerned authorities, 99% identifying check-points and lack of identify documents, 98% identifying explosive hazards, 97% curfews, 96% general violence and 94% activities of armed groups.
• Still out of those covered communities, all groups are highly affected by movement restrictions, especially people without civil documentation (99%), boys (98%), men and IDPS (97%), all other groups being identified as affected by 95% of those covered communities.
• Important needs for all protection services were identified for all population groups. All types of protection services (12 in total) were described as needed but not present for at least one population groups by 71% of covered communities or more. Legal services for civil documentation and HLP issues were reported as needed but not present for at least one population group by 86% of covered communities.
• 26% of covered communities reported concerns with humanitarian assistance. Out of the total covered, 49 communities reported that the assistance delivered was not “what the community needed”.
• Among covered communities having reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring, 84% covered communities referred to “concerns of approaching authority” among causes and 91% of covered communities indicated that “restricted freedom of movement” was one of the consequences.
• Among covered communities having reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring, all types of documents were difficult to obtain, among which passport and family booklets being identified as difficult to obtain by 90% of covered communities.
• 98% of covered communities reported housing, land and property issues as occurring. Out of those, 21% identified “property is unlawfully occupied by others” and 21% mentioned “lack of documents” as “very common” HLP concerns.
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
b. Overview of Protection issues with frequency of occurrence
i. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, using two different aggregation options across population groups
ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group
3.0% 1.7% 2.0% 2.6% 0.7%
13.5%
3.3% 0.3% 3.1% 1.0%
19.5%
0.3% 0.3%
33%21%
31%15% 26%
35%
29%25%
28% 29%
53%
25% 22%
37%
63%
37%
79%45%
31%
60%34%
66% 32%
27%
35% 39%
26%15%
30%
3%
28%21%
8%
40%
2%
39%
1%
40% 39%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/propertyissues
Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
AVERAGE FREQUENCY across population groups
28.9%
23.6%
23.5% 22.8%20.7%
25.2% 24.2% 22.5% 23.1% 22.3%53.6%
20.7% 18.8%
34% 40% 35% 31% 33% 30% 33%29% 34% 31%
35%
31% 29%
11% 22%12%
44% 18% 24% 35%9%
41%8%
10%
9%13%
26%15%
30%
3%
28%21%
8%
40%
2%
39%
1%
40% 39%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/propertyissues
Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
HIGHEST FREQUENCY occurrence as per one or more population groups Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
5.3% 5.1% 5.2% 4.6% 5.1%11.5%
5.7% 8.7% 6.5% 5.1%
18.2%
5.3% 6.0%
13% 10% 11% 6% 9%20%
10% 12% 15%7%
36%
14% 11%
26% 17% 33%22% 32%
45%
37% 24% 53%24%
32%
18% 18%
56%68%
51%68%
54%
24%47% 56%
25%
64%
13%
63% 65%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/propertyissues
Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Persons with disabilities
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group- contd
4.6% 4.7%14.9%
6.6% 3.1%
13.7%5.4%
23.8%
1.7% 1.7%
21% 25%
31%
25%15%
26%25%
43%
16% 18%
33%40%
33%
56%
29%
57%25%
29%
24% 22%
41%31%
21%12%
53%
3%
44%
4%
58% 59%
Domestic violence Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property issues Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil documents Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Men Very common issue Common issueSometimes Never happens
9.5% 6.1%14.5% 10.6%
6.0% 6.5% 8.1%
27.5%
7.0% 9.4%
29%25%
34%25%
25% 29% 23%
37%
24% 20%
30%39%
31%
56%24%
58%27%
33%
26% 28%
32% 30%21%
8%
45%
7%
42%
2%
43% 42%
Domestic violence Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property issues Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil documents Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Women
18.7% 13.0%7.0% 6.9% 7.4%
16.3%11.4%
2.7%7.2% 6.0%
26.1%
4.4% 3.0%
36%34%
26%18%
28%
32%27%
19%20% 29%
47%
18% 17%
19%36%
32%64%
34%
32%
48%
31%64%
24%
23%
29% 26%
26%17%
34%
11%
30%21% 13%
47%
8%
41%
4%
48% 53%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/propertyissues
Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Adolescent boys
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group- contd
17.4%
6.7% 7.3%16.3%
5.5%14.6%
7.7% 9.4% 7.7% 6.4%
29.9%
7.3% 6.4%
35%
21%29%
24%
23%
28%25% 24%
20% 24%
42%
26% 22%
20%
46%30%
54%
38%
36%
57% 21%59% 27%
24%
24%25%
27% 26%34%
5%
33%21%
11%
45%
14%
42%
4%
42% 47%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/propertyissues
Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Adolescent girlsVery common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
6.6% 8.1% 9.5%5.6% 2.4%
18.9%
7.7%3.1% 6.4%
27.4%
5.4% 3.4%
25% 21%26%
12% 24%
27%
20%20%
22%
42%
18% 18%
37% 41%30%
27%39%
33%
53%27%
28%
24%
26% 26%
32% 30% 34%
56%
35%21% 19%
51% 44%
7%
51% 52%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Boys
7.3% 4.4% 7.9%3.6% 4.2%
16.9%8.7%
4.1% 6.4%
27.7%
5.0% 4.1%
22%18%
28%
16% 17%
29%
21%20%
23%
38%
19% 19%
35%29%
29%
35% 40%
33%
52%29%
24%
29%
26% 27%
36%49%
34%45% 39%
21% 19%
48% 46%
6%
50% 51%
Child labour preventingschool attendance
Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civildocuments
Sexual harassment Sexual violence
Girls
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
c. Analysis per protection issue across population groups (with frequency of occurrence)
CHILD LABOUR PREVENTING SCHOOL ATTENDANCEi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
3.0%
28.9%18.7% 17.4% 6.6% 7.3% 5.3%
33%
34%36% 35%
25% 22%13%
37%
11%19% 20%
37% 35%
26%
26% 26% 26% 27% 32% 36%
56%
Aggregated (averagefrequency)
Aggregated (highestfrequency)
Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Jarablus
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
CHILD RECRUITMENTi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
1.7%23.6%
13.0% 6.7%8.1%
4.4% 5.1%
21%
40%
34%
21% 21%18% 10%
63%
22%
36%
46% 41%
29%
17%
15% 15% 17%26% 30%
49%
68%
Aggregated (averagefrequency)
Aggregated (highestfrequency)
Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with disabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Jarablus
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
EARLY MARRIAGEi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
2.6%22.8%
6.9%16.3% 5.6% 3.6% 4.6%
15%
31%
18%
24%
12% 16%6%
79%
44%
64%
54%
27%35%
22%
3% 3%11% 5%
56%45%
68%
Aggregated (averagefrequency)
Aggregated (highestfrequency)
Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with disabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Jarablus
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
ECONOMIC EXPLOITATIONi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.7%20.7%
4.7% 6.1%7.4% 5.5% 2.4% 4.2% 5.1%
26%
33%
25% 25% 28%23% 24% 17% 9%
45%
18%
40% 39% 34%38% 39%
40%
32%
28% 28% 31% 30% 30% 33% 35% 39%54%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Jarablus
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
EXPLOSIVE HAZARDSi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
13.5% 25.2%14.9% 14.5%
16.3% 14.6%18.9% 16.9%
11.5%
35%
30%
31% 34% 32% 28%27% 29%
20%
31% 24%33% 31% 32% 36% 33% 33%
45%
21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 24%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Jarablus
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
! Community in sub-district that has not reported high intensity conflict in last 2 years
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
FAMILY SEPARATIONi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
3.3%24.2%
6.6% 10.6%11.4%
7.7% 7.7% 8.7% 5.7%
29%
33%
25%25% 27%
25% 20% 21%10%
60%
35%
56%56% 48% 57%
53% 52%
37%
8% 8% 12% 8% 13% 11%19% 19%
47%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Jarablus
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
HARASSMENTi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.3%22.5%
3.1% 6.0% 2.7%9.4%
3.1% 4.1%8.7%
25%
29%
15%25%
19%
24%20% 20% 12%
34%
9%
29%
24%
31%
21%
27% 29% 24%
40% 40%53%
45% 47% 45% 51% 48%56%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Jarablus
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUESi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
3.1%23.1%
13.7% 6.5%7.2% 7.7% 6.5%
28%
34%
26%29%
20% 20% 15%
66%
41%
57%58%
64% 59%53%
2% 2% 3% 7% 8% 14%25%
Aggregated (averagefrequency)
Aggregated (highestfrequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Persons with disabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Jarablus
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
KIDNAPPINGi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
1.0%22.3%
5.4% 8.1% 6.0% 6.4% 6.4% 6.4% 5.1%
29%
31%
25% 23% 29% 24% 22% 23%7%
32%
8%
25% 27% 24%27% 28% 24%
24%
39% 39% 44% 42% 41% 42% 44% 46%64%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Jarablus
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
LACK/LOSS OF CIVIL DOCUMENTSi. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)
ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
19.5%53.6% 23.8%
27.5% 26.1%29.9% 27.4%
27.7%18.2%
53%
35%
43% 37% 47% 42% 42% 38%
36%
27%10%
29% 33% 23% 24% 24% 29%32%
1% 1% 4% 2% 4% 4% 7% 6%13%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest
frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
P
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Jarablus
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
Frequency of occurrence! Never happens
! Sometimes
! Common issue
! Very common issue! Not covered in analysis
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
SEXUAL VIOLENCE
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)
0.3%
20.7%1.7%
7.0% 4.4% 7.3% 5.4%5.0% 5.3%
25%
31%
16%
24%18%
26%18% 19% 14%
35%
9%
24%
26%
29%
24%
26% 26%18%
40% 40%
58%
43% 48%42%
51% 50%63%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest
frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
0.3%18.8%
1.7%9.4%
3.0%6.4% 3.4% 4.1% 6.0%
22%
29%
18%
20%
17%22%
18% 19% 11%
39%
13%
22%
28%
26%25%
26% 27%18%
39% 39%
59%
42%53%
47% 52% 51%65%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest
frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
2.0%23.5%
4.6%9.5% 7.0% 7.3% 9.5% 7.9% 5.2%
31%
35%
21%
29%26% 29% 26% 28%
11%
37%
12%
33%
30%32% 30% 30% 29%
33%
30% 30%41%
32% 34% 34% 34% 34%
51%
Aggregated(average
frequency)
Aggregated(highest frequency)
Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons withdisabilities
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE COPING MECHANISMS
5. COPING MECHANISMS
i. Analysis coverage
Number of communities covered in the analysis and number of communities reporting use of coping mechanism (i.e. used at least “sometimes” or more)
ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting the use of coping mechanisms by frequency of occurrence
Across population groups
Graph a: Taking the highest frequency of occurrence at community level
Graph b: Taking the average frequency of occurrence at community level
291 293 292 293 293 291 293 291
231 198
231
288
207 182 180
196
0
336
Begging Children dropping out ofschool to work
Engaging in illegalactivities (i.e theft,
smuggling)
Restricting movements ofwomen and girls
Relying on humanitarianassistance
Accessing communityservices (community
centres, women centres)
Local/community support Early marriage
Covered in the analysis Reported as used (at least sometimes)Total number of communities in Governorate
37% 39%
26% 24%
34% 34%
2% 3%
Accessing communityservices (community
centres, womencentres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used
6%
19%13%
4%
31%
8%
36%
34%37%
42%
42%
40%
37% 14% 17%33%
26%
23%
21%32% 33%
21%
2%
29%
Begging Childrendropping out ofschool to work
Early marriage Engaging inillegal activities
(i.e theft,smuggling)
Restrictingmovements of
women and girls
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
51% 53%
43% 41%
5% 5%
1% 1%
Accessing communityservices (community
centres, womencentres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used18%
23%19% 19%
33%
19%
35% 31% 32% 34%
40%
38%
27%14% 16%
26%
25%
13%
21%32% 33%
21%
2%
29%
Begging Childrendropping out ofschool to work
Early marriage Engaging inillegal activities
(i.e theft,smuggling)
Restrictingmovements of
women and girls
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE COPING MECHANISMS
ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting the use of coping mechanisms by frequency of occurrence -contd
By population groups
47% 48%
30% 30%
19% 17%
5% 5%
Accessing communityservices (community
centres, womencentres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used
7% 9% 10%
17%23% 27%
49%45% 31%
26% 23%33%
Begging Engaging in illegalactivities (i.e theft,
smuggling)
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Men
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
40% 41%
30% 31%
25% 24%
5% 4%
Accessing communityservices (community
centres, womencentres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used
8%3%
29%
10%
25% 29%
35%
31%
44% 41%
33%
28%
23% 27%
3%
31%
Begging Engaging inillegal activities
(i.e theft,smuggling)
Restrictingmovements of
women and girls
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Women
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
43% 44%
30% 27%
21% 23%
5% 5%
Accessingcommunity services(community centres,
women centres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used9%
21%11% 12% 10%
26%
25%
21% 26% 27%
42% 21%34%
40%30%
23%34% 34%
22%33%
Begging Childrendropping out ofschool to work
Early marriage Engaging inillegal activities
(i.e theft,smuggling)
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Boys
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
41% 44%
33% 28%
20% 22%
5% 7%
Accessingcommunity services(community centres,
women centres)
Local/communitysupport
Always used
Commonly used
Sometimes used
Never used
8%13% 16%
5%
30%
10%
27%28% 25%
19%
33%
25%
41% 26% 24%48%
34%
32%
24%33% 34% 27%
4%
33%
Begging Children droppingout of school to
work
Early marriage Engaging inillegal activities
(i.e theft,smuggling)
Restrictingmovements of
women and girls
Relying onhumanitarianassistance
Graph d: Girls
Never used
Sometimes used
Commonly used
Always used
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !
!!! !!!!
!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMAHOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
T U R K E Y
Ras AlAin
Areesheh
JarablusLower
ShyookhAin alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
Suluk
Ein Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
Communities where coping mechanisms used are! Covered! Not covered in the analysis
BeggingChildren dropping out of school to workEarly marriageEngaging in illegal activities (i.e theft, smuggling)Restricting movements of women and girlsRelying on humanitarian assistanceAccessing community services (community centres, women centres)Local/community support
Coping mechanisms used(Top 3 reported by most % communitiesin the sub-district)
iii. Map of top three coping mechanisms used per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chartshows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
COPING MECHANISMS USED PER SUB-DISTRICT
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS
6. MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS
a.Causes of Movement restrictions
i. Analysis coverage
Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting causes of movement restrictions as occurring
ii. Percentage of communities reporting causes of movement restrictions (by frequency of occurrence)
iii. Percentage of communities reporting specific causes, out of those reporting occurrence of movement restrictions
256 257 256 257 257 257 256 257
203 215 210 208 215 213 215 217
0
336
Activities of armedgroups
Checkpoints Curfews General violence Lack of identitydocuments
Presence of explosivehazards
Rules imposed byconcerned authorities
Screening processes
Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (as least sometimes) Total number of communities in the Governorate
17.8%22.7% 12.5%
27.3%
29.2% 17.4%20.8% 22.0%
33%43%
28%
26%33%
34%38% 34%
27%16%
39%26%
20%30%
22% 26%
20% 16% 17% 19% 16% 17% 16% 15%
Activities of armedgroups
Checkpoints Curfews General violence Lack of identitydocuments
Presence ofexplosive hazards
Rules imposed byconcerned authorities
Screening processes
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
YES (movement
restrictions are reported as occurring)
224 85%
NO (movement restrictions
are not reported as occurring)
40 15%
100%
100%
99%
99%
98%
97%
96%
94%
Screening processes
Rules imposed by concerned authorities
Checkpoints
Lack of identity documents
Presence of explosive hazards
Curfews
General violence
Activities of armed groups
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chartshows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
iv. Map of top three causes of movement restrictions per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !
!!!!!!!
!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
T U R K E Y
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
Suluk
Ein Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
Ras AlAin
Al-HasakehAreesheh
Khanaser
JarablusGhandorah
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
Activities of armed groupsCheckpointsCurfews
General violenceLack of identity documentsPresence of explosive hazardsRules imposed by concerned authoritiesScreening processes
Communities where movement restrictions were! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
CAUSES OF MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS PER SUB-DISTRICT
Causes of movementrestrictions(Top 3 reported by most% communitiesin the sub-district)
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS
b. Population groups affected by movement restrictions
i. Analysis coverage
Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting population groups affected by movement restrictions (by occurrence)
ii. Percentage of communities reporting population groups affected by movement restrictions (by frequency of occurrence)
iii. Percentage of communities reporting specific affected population groups, out of those reporting occurrence of movement restrictions
236 236 236 236 236 236 236 235 236
145
186 186 187 186 192 191 194 190
0
336
Persons withdisabilities
Girls (<18) movingalone
Girls (<18) movingwith a companion
Women movingalone
Women moving witha companion
Boys (<18) Men People without civildocumentation
IDPs
Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (as least sometimes) Total number of communities in Syria
1.9%
24.2%4.9%
25.0%
2.3% 7.2% 8.7%27.3%
15.2%5%
28%
18%
24%
21%
30%34%
33%
23%48%
18%
47%
22%
47%
35% 30%
13%
34%
34%
19% 19% 19% 19% 17% 17% 16% 17%
Persons withdisabilities
Girls (<18) movingalone
Girls (<18) movingwith a companion
Women moving alone Women moving with acompanion
Boys (<18) Men People without civildocumentation
IDPs
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens
99%
98%
97%
97%
95%
95%
95%
95%
People without civil documentation
Boys (<18)
Men
IDPs
Women moving alone
Girls (<18) moving with a companion
Girls (<18) moving alone
Women moving with a companion
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chartshows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
iv. Map of top three population groups affected by movement restrictions per sub-district (based on percentage of communitiesreporting occurrence)
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !
!!!!!!!
!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
T U R K E Y
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
Suluk
Ein Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
Ras AlAin
Al-HasakehAreesheh
Khanaser
JarablusLower
ShyookhAin alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
As-Saan OqeirbatSokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
MenBoysGirls moving alone
Girls moving with a companionWomen moving aloneWomen moving with a companionPersons without civil documentationIDPsPersons with disabilities
Communities where movement restrictions were! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
POPULATION GROUPS AFFECTED BY MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS PER SUB-DISTRICT
Population groups affectedby movement restrictions(Top 3 reported by most% communitiesin the sub-district)
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION SERVICES
7. PROTECTION SERVICES
ii. Percentage of communities reporting presence and needs of protection services across population groups
Across population groups
i. Analysis coverage (Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting needs of protection services (i.e. “present but insufficient” or “not present but needed")
Graph a: Taking the most severe status of needs and presence
Graph b: Taking the average status of needs and presence
Medical treatment forsurvivors of sexualviolence/domestic
violence
Protection services forchildren
Recreational activities Services for personswith disabilities
Girls
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !!
!
!!! !
!!! !!!!
!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
T U R K E Y
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
Suluk
Ein Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
Ras AlAin
JarablusLower
ShyookhAin alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
As-Saan Oqeirbat SokhnehDeir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
Communities where protection services are! Reported as needed! NOT reported as needed! Not covered in analysis
Community centres Women and girls centres Explosive hazard risk education Legal services for civil documentation Legal services for Housing, Land and Property issues
Psychosocial support services Psychosocial support for survivors of sexual violence/domestic violence Medical treatment for sexual/domestic violence survivors Protection services for children Recreational activities Care mechanisms for elderly persons Services for persons with disabilities
Protection services needed(Top 3 reported by most % communitiesin the sub-district)
iii. Map of top three protection services needed per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting need)
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as needed irrespective of presence. They are NOT indicative of the severity of need. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than threeoptions, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less thanthree options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
PROTECTION SERVICES NEEDED PER SUB-DISTRICT
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE CONCERNS WITH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
8. CONCERNS/PROBLEMS DURING DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
i. Analysis coverage
a. Across population groups (For categories which required aggregation, highest frequency was adopted)
ii. Number of covered communities reporting concerns reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last 3 monthsby frequency of occurrence
Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting concerns regarding how humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last three months (by occurrence)
57
44 49
29 27
35
49
35 36
11 7 50
57
Assistance given is not what thecommunity needs
Request for civil documentation toaccess assistance
Discrimination/exclusion Sexual harassment Humanitarian assistance is notfree/ Money is asked in exchange
for assistance
Request of sexual favour/exploitation in exchange for
humanitarian assistance
Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (at least sometimes) Number of communities in the Governoratereporting concerns with humanitarian assistance
YES (concerns with humanitarian
assistance are reported as
occurring), 57 , 26%
NO (concerns with humanitarian
assistance are not reported as
occurring) 161 , 74%
13
3
19
2 2 1
11
10
10
6 3
2
25
23
6
3 2
2
Assistance given is not what thecommunity needs
Discrimination/exclusion Request for civil documentationto access assistance
Sexual harassment Humanitarian assistance is notfree/ Money is asked inexchange for assistance
Request of sexual favour/exploitation in exchange for
humanitarian assistance
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes
AR-RAQQA GOVERNORATE CONCERNS WITH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
ii. Number of covered communities reporting concerns reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last 3 months by frequency of occurrence - contd
Humanitarian assistance is not free/ Money is asked in exchange for assistance
Request of sexual favour/ exploitation in exchange for humanitarian assistance
b. By population groups
Request for civil documentation to access assistance Sexual harassment
iii. Number of covered communities having reported discrimination as a concern reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last three months identifying population groups affected by discrimination
16
10
10
9
9
9
8
8
8
7
5
Old persons
Women living alone
Unaccompanied girls
Divorced women
Unaccompanied boys
Men living alone
Boys head of household
Girls head of household
Widows
Women head of household
Persons with disabilities (HA)
2
1 1 1
2 4
-
2
3 2
6
4
Boys Girls Men Women
15 15 19
17
11 11 3 11
9 6 13 7
Boys Girls Men Women
1
- - -
1
1 -
2
3 4
3
3
Boys Girls Men Women
1 1 -
1
2 5
-
5
7 3
6
4
Boys Girls Men Women
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !!!!!!!!
!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
T U R K E Y
Ras AlAin
Jarablus
LowerShyookh Ain al
Arab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
As-Saan Oqeirbat SokhnehDeir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
Suluk
Ein Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
Communities where concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance are! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
Assistance given is not what the community needs Request for civil documentation to access assistance Humanitarian assistance is not free/ Money is asked in exchange for assistance Request of sexual favour/ exploitation in exchange for humanitarian assistance Sexual harassmentDiscrimination/exclusion
Concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance(Top 3 reported by most % communitiesin the sub-district)
iv. Map of top three concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance in the last three months per sub-district (based on percentage ofcommunities reporting occurrence)
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chartshows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
CONCERNS WITH DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE PER SUB-DISTRICT
AL-HASAKEH GOVERNORATE CIVIL DOCUMENTATION
9. CIVIL DOCUMENTATION
a. Reasons for not having civil documentation
b. Type of document that is not possible to be obtained in the community
c. Impact of not having civil documentation
i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific impact of not having civil documents, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation
i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific document that was not possible to obtain in the community, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation
i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific reason for not having civil documentation, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation
84%
82%
82%
79%
76%
76%
75%
59%
54%
44%
43%
Concerns of approaching authority
Confiscated
GoS Services not available
Lost
Could not afford it
Left behind when fleeing
Expired document
Didn’t attempt to obtain it
Counselling/legal services not available
Another family member has possession of it
Never had it
90%
90%
89%
89%
89%
86%
85%
85%
82%
78%
76%
75%
68%
Passport
Family Booklet
Civil record (extract)
Death Certificate
Syrian ID
Divorce record
Marriage Certificate
Birth Certificate
Residence support document
Travel authorisation document
Deed/Tabou
Approval for lease agreement
Disability ID
91%
86%
77%
75%
65%
59%
58%
Restricted freedom of movement
Cannot register birth/marriage/death
Unable to access basic services
Arrest
Unable to access humanitarian assistance
Cannot claim property
Cannot register land/access transactions
YES (lack/loss of documentation is
reported as occurring)305 , 99%
NO (lack/loss of documentation is not reported as
occurring) 3 , 1%
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !
!!! !!!!
!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
T U R K E Y
Ras AlAin
Jarablu s
Low erShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
Al-Thaw rah
Mansu ra
Ju rneyyeh
TellAbiad
Su lu k
Ein Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illu strate the top three options reported in the su b-district, based on the percentage of commu nities reporting eachoption as occu rring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequ ency/severity of occu rrence. In su b-districts w here the pie chart show smore than three options, it means that all displayed options w ere reported by the same percentage of commu nities. In su b-districts w here the pie chartshow s less than three options, it means that only displayed options w ere reported.
d. Map of top three reasons for not having civil documentation, per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)
Communities where lack/loss of civil documentation is! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
Concerns of approaching au thorityGoS Serv ices not availableCou nselling/legal serv ices not availableNever had it
Didn’t attempt to obtain itAnother family member has possession of itEx pired docu mentCou ld not afford itConfiscatedLeft behind w hen fleeingLost
Reasons for not havingcivil documentation(Top 3 reported by most % communities in the sub-district)
REASONS FOR NOT HAVING CIVIL DOCUMENTATION PER SUB-DISTRICT
NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting eachoption as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showsmore than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chartshows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
ii. Map of top three types of documents that are not possible to obtain in the community, per sub-district (based on percentage ofcommunities reporting occurrence)
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !
!!!!!!!
!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
T U R K E Y
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
Suluk
Ein Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
Ras AlAin
Al-HasakehAreesheh
Khanaser
Jarablus
GhandorahLower
ShyookhAin alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
As-SaanOqeirbat Sokhneh
Deir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
Birth CertificateCivil record (extract)Marriage Certificate
Divorce recordFamily BookletDeath CertificateDisability IDSyrian ID
PassportTravel authorisation documentApproval for lease agreementDeed/TabouResidence support document
Communities where lack/loss of civil documention is! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
Types of documentsthat are not possibleto obtain (Top 3 reportedby most % communitiesin the sub-district)
TYPES OF DOCUMENTS NOT POSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PER SUB-DISTRICT
SEUSSI YTREPORP DNA DNAL ,GNISUOHETARONREVOG AQQAR-RA
10. HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUES
a.Concerns regarding Housing, land and property (HLP)
ii. Map of top three HLP concerns per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.
i. Percentage of communities, identifying specific HLP concerns, by frequency of occurrence, out of those reporting the occurrence of HLP issues.
13.3% 11.8%20.6%
13.4% 11.9% 15.9%21.1%
12.4% 12.3%
42%34%
47%
32%24%
26%29%
33% 28%
39% 51%30%
51%55%
56% 47% 52% 57%
5% 4% 2% 4% 9% 2% 2% 2% 3%
Damage of landor property
Looting of privateproperty
Property isunlawfully
occupied byothers
Disputedownership
Rental disputes(landlord/tenant
problems)
No housingavailable
Lack ofdocuments
Rules andprocesses on
housing and landnot clear orchanging
Cannotaccess/lost
access housingbecause can
afford it
Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happensYES (HLP issues are reported as occurring),288 , 98%
NO (HLP issues are not
reported as occurring)
, 7 , 2%
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!! !
!!!!!!!
!
!!!
AL-HASAKEH
AR-RAQQA
ALEPPO
HAMA HOMS
DEIR-EZ-ZOR
Ras AlAin
Al-Hasakeh
TalTamer
AreeshehRasm Haram
El-Imam
Khanaser
Jarablus
Ghandorah
LowerShyookh
Ain alArab
Sarin
Menbij
AbuQalqal
Al-Khafsa
Maskana
As-Saan
Oqeirbat SokhnehDeir-ez-Zor
Kisreh
Tabni
T U R K E Y
Al-Thawrah
Mansura
Jurneyyeh
TellAbiad
SulukEin Issa
Ar-Raqqa
Sabka
Karama
Maadan
Lack of documents
Damage of land or property
Looting of private property
No housing available
Disputed ownership
Rental disputes (landlord/tenant problems)
Property is unlawfully occupied by others
Rules and processes on housing and land not clear or changing
Cannot access/lost access housing because can afford it
Housing, land and propertyconcerns (Top 3 reportedby most % communitiesin the sub-district)
Communities where HLP issues are! Reported! NOT reported! Not covered in analysis
HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY CONCERNS PER SUB-DISTRICT
![Covid Rapid Assessment 4 maps · 2 7 47 12 11 54 µ Z } ] Medical personnel NGOs Other 171 121 ô î 27 ò ô ï 195 ... Abu Kamal Qaryatein Deir-ez-Zor Al-Khafsa Oqeirbat As-Saan](https://static.documents.pub/doc/80x56/5f46ee703b503d0a8e3fee33/covid-rapid-assessment-4-maps-2-7-47-12-11-54-z-medical-personnel-ngos-other.jpg)
