+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ARDB E 1 250 Closure

ARDB E 1 250 Closure

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: mani-sankar
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 21

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    1/21

    EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Shock Wave Boundary-Layer Interaction Study on a 20o

    Compression Corner Using PSP and Kulites

    Principal Investigator

    S.B.Verma

    Co-investigatorChanna Raju and Manisankar, C.

    Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR),

    Experimental Aerodynamics Division, National Aerospace Laboratories

    Bangalore 560 017

    AR&DB Sanction Ref : AR&DB Project DARO/08/1031316/M/IAR& DB Project No. : 1316

    Date of Commencement : July 29th, 2009

    Original PDC : June, 2011

    Project Cost : Rs.8.999 Lakhs

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    2/21

    EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Introduction

    ramp flows

    forebody ramp flows

    axial corner

    (glancing shock)shock reflection

    crossing-shock

    interaction

    Typical Vehicle Components where SWBLI is Expected

    Wind tunnel experiments are indispensable, especially

    to investigate pressure loads, shock unsteadiness characteristics in regions

    of interest and to look for the mechanisms responsible

    to obtain the desired design information with sufficient reliability

    neck region

    interaction point (I)

    separation

    compression fan

    sonic line

    undisturbed

    boundary-layer

    Xphysep

    LsepL

    reattachment

    compression fan

    separated

    shear layer

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    3/21

    EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Specific Objectives of the Proposal

    To gain a broad understanding of the shock-wave boundary layer interaction

    (SWBLI) phenomena on a 20ocompression corner with emphasis on shock

    unsteadiness and the related surface-flow structure development at freestream

    Mach number of 2.0.

    To compare the SWBLI characteristics on the ramp by varying the boundary-

    layer thickness () and using one vortex-generator configuration

    To obtain surface pressure map of such interactions using PSP to get better

    insight of the global mean-flow characteristics

    Surface oil visualization to study surface flow characteristics and Spark Schlieren

    visualization for the different test cases.

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    4/21

    EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Actual Model Mounted in the 0.3m Tunnel

    For Pressure measurements and schlieren Moundel mounting for PSP

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    5/21

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    6/21

    EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    boundary-layer tripramp

    flat plate

    leading edge plate

    strut

    sting support

    model support strut

    schlieren window

    base plate

    Compression Corner Model

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    7/21EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    10 Kulite transducer

    Locations (XT-140M)

    10m

    m5m

    m

    5m

    m

    VG

    strip

    5m

    m

    Kulite XCQ-93 6nos.

    (a) VG1

    (a) VG2

    Mechanical Vortex Generators

    3

    10o

    3.5

    3.5

    10o

    4

    X

    Z

    Y

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    8/21EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    separation shock

    reattachment shock

    trip initiated shocks

    tripped blayer

    reattached

    blayer

    With trip; no VG

    separation shock

    reattachment shock

    trip initiated shocks

    shocks from VGs

    reattached

    blayer

    With trip; VG1

    separation shock

    reattachment shock

    trip initiated shocks

    shocks from VGs

    reattached

    blayer

    With trip; VG2

    With trip; noVG

    With trip; VG1

    With trip; VG2

    Spark Schlieren Pictures

    =1.6mm; 27.5 =3.85mm; 12.5

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    9/21EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Spark Schlieren Movies

    no VG VG1

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    10/21EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    (a) no VG

    separation line

    reattachment line

    (b) VG1

    corrugated

    separation linevortex trails

    reattachment line

    (c) VG2

    corrugated

    separation line

    vortex trails

    striation patternreattachment line

    Surface Oil Visualization: h/= 0.65

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    11/21EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    vortex trails

    corrugated

    separation line

    vortex trails

    corrugated

    separation line

    Surface Oil Visualization: h/= 0.26

    VG1 VG2

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    12/21EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Schematic of the Surface Flow Development

    Overall surface flow pattern

    X

    Z

    Y

    corrugated shock

    micro-ramps

    streamwise

    CRVs

    main flow

    reverse flow

    flow

    reverse flowcorrugated

    separation line

    Corrugated separation line pattern

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    13/21EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Streamwise Mean Pressure and rmsDistribution

    X/L

    Pw

    /P

    0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.20

    1

    2

    3

    4

    no VG

    VG1

    VG2

    (a)

    (d)

    X/L

    w

    /P

    w

    0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.20

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    no VG

    VG1

    VG2

    (d)

    base plate ramp section

    corner location

    (c)

    X/L

    w

    0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.20

    1

    2

    3

    4

    no VG

    VG1

    VG2

    (c)

    base plate ramp section

    corner location

    h/=0.65 h/=0.26

    (b)

    X/L

    w

    /P

    w

    0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.20

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    no VG

    VG1

    VG2

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    14/21EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Spectral Analysis

    frequency (Hz)

    G(f)(p

    si2/Hz)

    100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    10510

    -10

    10-8

    10-6

    10-4

    10-2

    100

    no VG

    VG1

    VG2

    (a)X/L= 0.951

    Separation region (1)

    frequency (Hz)

    G(f)(psi

    2/Hz)

    100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    10510

    -10

    10-8

    10-6

    10-4

    10

    -2

    100

    no VG

    VG1

    VG2

    (c)X/L= 1.017

    reattachment region (3)

    frequency (Hz)

    G(f)(p

    si2/Hz)

    100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    10510

    -10

    10-8

    10-6

    10-4

    10-2

    100

    no VG

    VG1

    VG2

    (b)X/L= 0.97

    Separated region (2)

    frequency (Hz)

    G(f)(psi

    2/Hz)

    100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    10510

    -10

    10-8

    10-6

    10-4

    10

    -2

    100

    no VG

    VG1

    VG2

    (d)X/L= 1.089

    Downstream of reattachment (4)

    1

    23 4

    X/L

    w/P

    w

    0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.20

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    no VG

    VG1

    VG2

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    15/21

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    16/21EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    X (mm)

    Pw

    /P

    200 220 240 260 280 300 3200.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    transducer - no VG

    PSP - no VG

    Y (mm)

    Cp

    -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.20

    0.1

    0.2

    (b)

    Y (mm)

    Cp

    -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.20

    0.1

    0.2

    (c)

    X (mm)

    Pw

    /P

    240 250 260 270 2800.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    PSP - no VG

    PSP - VG1

    PSP - VG2

    (a)

    PSP Measurements

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    17/21EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    time (ms)

    Rpp

    (0,0,

    )

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.50

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0.912

    0.931

    0.951

    0.971

    1.017

    1.035

    (a)

    time (ms)

    Rpp

    (0,0,

    )

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.50

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.20.892

    0.912

    0.931

    0.951

    0.971

    1.017

    1.035

    (b)

    time (ms)

    Rpp

    (0,0,

    )

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.50

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.20.912

    0.931

    0.951

    0.971

    1.017

    1.035

    (c)

    Auto correlation Measurements

    no VG VG1 VG2

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    18/21

    EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Cross - correlation Measurements

    (a)

    time (ms)

    Rpp

    (,0,

    )

    -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2-0.2

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.912 0.931

    0.912 0.951

    0.931 0.951

    0.951 0.971

    time (ms)

    Rpp

    (,0,

    )

    -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2-0.2

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.60.892 0.912

    0.912 0.951

    0.931 0.9510.951 0.971

    (b)

    time (ms)

    Rpp

    (,0,

    )

    -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2-0.2

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.60.912 0.931

    0.912 0.951

    0.931 0.951

    0.951 0.971

    (c)

    no VG VG1 VG2

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    19/21

    EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Conclusions

    Control devices generate streamwise vortices that dramatically modify the overall

    flow structure development in the entire interaction region.

    A well-defined separation line (with no control) gets replaced by a highly corrugated

    separation line (with control).

    A well defined reattachment line gets replaced by a striation pattern (with control)

    In the intermittent region of separation, a significant reduction in peak rmsvalue (by

    33%) for VG1 followed by VG2 (by 44%) occurs

    VG1 configuration shows favorable flow control in both axial locations and hence, seems

    to be a better flow control VG configuration

    The comparison between the pressure port data and PSP is generally good

    The spanwise wall pressure variation shows a sinusoidal pattern indicating trails of

    vortices generated from the VG configurations

    Flow control helps reduce the fluctuations of the separation shock and hence, alleviate

    the fluctuating pressure loads

    Suggestions for future work:Effect of micro-ramps need to be studied in both subsonic and supersonic flows

    Other flow control devices such as air-jet vortex generators (skew angle) need to be investigated

    Application of these devices to other SWBLIs such as swept fin, blunt fin etc. needs to be tested

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    20/21

    EAD, National Aerospace Laborotories, Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR-NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011

    Statement of Account

    Period Costs released (under

    different heads)

    Expenditure incurred

    (under different heads)

    upto 30.04.2011

    Balance as on

    30.04.11 (under

    different heads)

    (Rs in lakhs) (Rs in lakhs) (Rs in lakhs)

    2009-11 Capital Equipment

    3.90

    3.90 0.00

    Research staff2.16

    2.16 0.00

    TA/DA0.45

    0.45 0.00

    Consumables1.25

    1.25 0.00

    Contingencies0.40

    0.40 0.00

    Overheads

    0.839

    0.839 0.00

    Total 8.999 8.999 0.00

  • 8/13/2019 ARDB E 1 250 Closure

    21/21

    EAD National Aerospace Laborotories Bangalore

    S.B.Verma

    CSIR NAL

    AR&DB Annual Symposium, 13-14 May 2011


Recommended