Date post: | 18-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | elizabeth-rodgers |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
ARE YOU READY?
Introducing Your Topic
The Resolution
Resolved: On balance, the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission harms the election process.
Huh?
Definitions
On balance: Overall; considering all the costs and benefits.
The Supreme Court The highest court in the United States. It consists of nine
justices who have the final say on the constitutionality of laws in our country.
Electorate: the voting public
Constituents: the people a politician represents
Definitions
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
an independent regulatory agency that was founded in 1975 by the United States Congress to regulate the campaign finance legislation in the United States. It was created in a provision of the 1975 amendment to the Federal Election Campaign Act.
The First Amendment
Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
What is speech?
Actual speech Written expressionMusicVideoBody language$$ Money $$
Money and Politics
“A fool and his money are soon elected.” Will Rogers
Money and Politics:
Things that cost money in politics:Campaign manager Campaign director Office manager Communications team Building and maintaining a good websiteBrochures, stickers, t-shirts, hats Office supplies (computers, phones, paper, pens, pencils,
white boards, markers, staplers, etc) Food for staff late at night or on the road Transportation costs Advertisement
Money and Politics:
A better campaign managerA better campaign directorA better office managerMore people on your communication team (also, better
trained)A better websiteMore and nicer brochures, stickers, t-shirts, etc.More supplies (and nicer)More and faster transportation (means you can talk to more
people)MORE AND BETTER ADVERTISING
So If You Have More $$$, You Most Likely Have:
Sources of Campaign Dollars
Personal Wealth
Contributions from supportive political party
DONATIONS If donations come in small amounts, a candidate will
need A LOT of them, meaning he or she will need to support policies with broad popular appeal.
If donations come in large amounts, a candidate needs to please fewer people…
2012 Presidential Race
How much did it cost?
http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/i/2012/10/03/PRESIDENTIAL-DEBATE.jpg
Allowed Not Allowed
Issue adsNon-profit
organizations could run ads if they did not directly coordinate with any particular candidate
Unions and corporations could not use company money finance ads
Contributions to PACs were limited
Before Citizens United v Federal Election Commission
Allowed Not Allowed
Companies can use money from the general budget to finance ads
Unlimited donation to outside organizations to run ads on their behalf
SuperPacs
Limits on direct campaign donations
Still cannot coordinate directly with candidates
After Citizens United v FEC
http://www.republicreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Color-Super-Pacs-300x232.jpg
Look at it again:
Resolved: On balance, the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission harms the election process.
Pro: This change hurt the election processCon: This change has either not hurt, or has
helped, the election process.
Does it make more sense now?
What Makes A Good Electoral Process?
Meaningful Choice
Informed Participation
Governmental Legitimacy
Meaningful Choice
If there is no difference between candidates, the choice is meaningless.
There will be some similarities, that’s a good thing. Want a strong economy Perceived strength abroad Freedom!
A wider field of candidates is a good thing.
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cssn/greens/republicrat1.gif
Primary Elections:
And election begins Republican vs. Republican and Democrat vs. Democrat.
Primary elections are held state by state to determine the official party candidate.
http://images.politico.com/global/news/110810_debatecomp_reuters_3.jpghttp://blog.pennlive.com/pennsyltucky/2007/06/demsdebate628.jpg
Questions for research--
Did changes in regulation of money change the primaries?
How?Did it make them more diverse in ideas or
less?
If pro can prove there were fewer legitimate candidates: the election was process harmed.
If the con can prove there were more legitimate candidates: the election process was helped.
Informed Participation
Voters vote based on the information they have.
If they are misinformed, their choice is not a true expression of their will.
A blind choice is no choice at all.
“The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.” John F. Kennedy
http://www-tc.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/files/2011/04/ethicsofvoting.jpg
http://images.sodahead.com/profiles/0/0/1/2/0/7/6/5/7/kkjhg-28394385275.jpeg
Effect on Resolution
If the Citizens United decision has decreased the amount of reliable information available to voters:
The election process was harmed.
If the CU decision has increased the amount of reliable information available to voters:
The election process is better.
If the amount of reliable information available to voters has stayed the same: pro argument or con?
Con!
Governmental Legitimacy
Will the elected government be perceived to be legitimate?
We are more likely to obey laws, pay taxes, etc., if we think our government has the legitimate right to make these laws and levy these taxes.
We vote=we chose=we are obligated to follow gov’t.
Perception matters.How has the Citizens United decision
affected how people view the election process?
Click icon to add picture
http://media.cagle.com/82/2012/06/13/113406_600.jpg
Click icon to add picture
http://philebersole.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/2009-09_cartoon.jpg
Click icon to add picture
Top Spending by Outside Groups:
Restore Our Future, Inc.American CrossroadsRepublican National
CommitteeAmericans for
ProsperityNational Rifle
Association of America Political Victory Fund
$88.6m--Against Obama$84.6m—Against Obama$41.1m—Against Obama
$33.5m—Against Obama$9.8m—Against Obama
Super Pac Spending in the last election:
Top Spending by Outside Groups:
Priorities USA Action
Restore Our Future, Inc.
American Crossroads
Ending Spending Action Fund
SEIU COPE
$64.8m--Against Romney$12.8m—For Romney
$6.5m—For Romney$4.7m—For Romney
$3.6m—Against Romney
Super Pac Spending in the last election: