+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Area of Interest 2, Geomechanics of CO Reservoir … Library/Events/2017/carbon-storage... · Area...

Area of Interest 2, Geomechanics of CO Reservoir … Library/Events/2017/carbon-storage... · Area...

Date post: 20-Sep-2018
Category:
Upload: dinhhanh
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
31
Area of Interest 2, Geomechanics of CO 2 Reservoir Seals DE-FE0023316 Peter Eichhubl 1 , Xiaofeng Chen 1 , Owen Callahan 1 , Jon Major 1 Jon Olson 3 , Tom Dewers 2 , Pania Newell 4 1 Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin 2 Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 3 UT Center for Petroleum & Geosystems Engineering 4 University of Utah U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Mastering the Subsurface Through Technology, Innovation and Collaboration: Carbon Storage and Oil and Natural Gas Technologies Review Meeting August 1-3, 2017 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL8500
Transcript

Area of Interest 2Geomechanics of CO2

Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316

Peter Eichhubl1 Xiaofeng Chen1 Owen Callahan1 Jon Major1

Jon Olson3 Tom Dewers2 Pania Newell4

1 Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin2Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque NM

3UT Center for Petroleum amp Geosystems Engineering4University of Utah

US Department of EnergyNational Energy Technology Laboratory

Mastering the Subsurface Through Technology Innovation and CollaborationCarbon Storage and Oil and Natural Gas Technologies Review Meeting

August 1-3 2017

Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation for the US Department of Energyrsquos National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL8500

Problem Statementbull Sealing efficiency of CO2 reservoirs has to

exceed 99bull Design criteria are needed that establish the

long term sealing capacity of CO2 reservoirs and to model leakage risk

bull Top and fault seal risk assessment well established in oil amp gas exploration but

bull scCO2 and CO2 brine potentially interact physically amp chemically with top seal

bull Seal risk assessment criteria taking these interactions into account are needed for CO2systems 2

3

Faultcore

Faultdamage

zone

Faultdamage

zone

1 m

Normal fault in sandstone-siltstone sequence

Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone

Cappa and Rutqvist 2011 Chester et al 1993

Opening-mode amp sheared opening-mode fractures control flow properties of conductive fault zonesSlip surfaces control damage zone evolution

4

Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site

Active on 102 - 105 year time scales

5 cm

Methodologybull Experimental measurement of subcritical

fracture propagation in various shale lithologiesndash Double torsion test unconfined conditionsndash Short-rod test confined conditions (scCO2)

bull Textural and compositional characterizationndash Shale material used for fracture testingndash Post-mortem analysis of lab test specimensndash Fractures amp CO2 alteration in natural systems

bull Numerical modeling of fracture propagation in top sealsndash Fracture network modeling using JOINTSndash Upscaled modeling for top seal deformation using

Sierra Mechanics5

Mode-I fracture testing

6

Loading configuration

Log KI

Log

V

KIC

V fracture propagation velocityKI mode-I stress intensity factor K0 Stress corrosion limitKIC mode-I fracture toughnessn subcritical crack index (SCI)

Experimental setup

Testing protocolbull Three shale types

ndash Woodford Mancos Marcellusndash Also sandstones for comparisonintegration

bull Room dry CO2gas DI waterbull Varying salinity NaCl KClbull Varying pHbull Room temperature 65degC bull Some samples coated with hydrophobic

agent to limit fluidrock interaction to fracture tip 7

Shale sample composition

8

Mancos shale

Marcellus shale

Woodford shale

fsp

qtz

clay

dol

qtzfspcalclay

cal

dol

fsp

qtz

pyrite

25 microm

25 microm

25 microm

clay

Qtz clays fsp

Calcite Qtz clays carbonate

Fracture trace imaging

9

10 microm 20 microm 2 microm

Woodford Mancos Marcellus

Woodford Mancos intergranular (clay matrix)Marcellus intragranular (cleavage)

Fracture surface imaging

10Roughness variation but no plumose structureGrain boundary breakage vs transgranular breakage

300 microm

Marcellus shale

20 microm20 microm

500 microm

Mancos shale

cleavage

clay

clay

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Problem Statementbull Sealing efficiency of CO2 reservoirs has to

exceed 99bull Design criteria are needed that establish the

long term sealing capacity of CO2 reservoirs and to model leakage risk

bull Top and fault seal risk assessment well established in oil amp gas exploration but

bull scCO2 and CO2 brine potentially interact physically amp chemically with top seal

bull Seal risk assessment criteria taking these interactions into account are needed for CO2systems 2

3

Faultcore

Faultdamage

zone

Faultdamage

zone

1 m

Normal fault in sandstone-siltstone sequence

Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone

Cappa and Rutqvist 2011 Chester et al 1993

Opening-mode amp sheared opening-mode fractures control flow properties of conductive fault zonesSlip surfaces control damage zone evolution

4

Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site

Active on 102 - 105 year time scales

5 cm

Methodologybull Experimental measurement of subcritical

fracture propagation in various shale lithologiesndash Double torsion test unconfined conditionsndash Short-rod test confined conditions (scCO2)

bull Textural and compositional characterizationndash Shale material used for fracture testingndash Post-mortem analysis of lab test specimensndash Fractures amp CO2 alteration in natural systems

bull Numerical modeling of fracture propagation in top sealsndash Fracture network modeling using JOINTSndash Upscaled modeling for top seal deformation using

Sierra Mechanics5

Mode-I fracture testing

6

Loading configuration

Log KI

Log

V

KIC

V fracture propagation velocityKI mode-I stress intensity factor K0 Stress corrosion limitKIC mode-I fracture toughnessn subcritical crack index (SCI)

Experimental setup

Testing protocolbull Three shale types

ndash Woodford Mancos Marcellusndash Also sandstones for comparisonintegration

bull Room dry CO2gas DI waterbull Varying salinity NaCl KClbull Varying pHbull Room temperature 65degC bull Some samples coated with hydrophobic

agent to limit fluidrock interaction to fracture tip 7

Shale sample composition

8

Mancos shale

Marcellus shale

Woodford shale

fsp

qtz

clay

dol

qtzfspcalclay

cal

dol

fsp

qtz

pyrite

25 microm

25 microm

25 microm

clay

Qtz clays fsp

Calcite Qtz clays carbonate

Fracture trace imaging

9

10 microm 20 microm 2 microm

Woodford Mancos Marcellus

Woodford Mancos intergranular (clay matrix)Marcellus intragranular (cleavage)

Fracture surface imaging

10Roughness variation but no plumose structureGrain boundary breakage vs transgranular breakage

300 microm

Marcellus shale

20 microm20 microm

500 microm

Mancos shale

cleavage

clay

clay

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

3

Faultcore

Faultdamage

zone

Faultdamage

zone

1 m

Normal fault in sandstone-siltstone sequence

Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone

Cappa and Rutqvist 2011 Chester et al 1993

Opening-mode amp sheared opening-mode fractures control flow properties of conductive fault zonesSlip surfaces control damage zone evolution

4

Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site

Active on 102 - 105 year time scales

5 cm

Methodologybull Experimental measurement of subcritical

fracture propagation in various shale lithologiesndash Double torsion test unconfined conditionsndash Short-rod test confined conditions (scCO2)

bull Textural and compositional characterizationndash Shale material used for fracture testingndash Post-mortem analysis of lab test specimensndash Fractures amp CO2 alteration in natural systems

bull Numerical modeling of fracture propagation in top sealsndash Fracture network modeling using JOINTSndash Upscaled modeling for top seal deformation using

Sierra Mechanics5

Mode-I fracture testing

6

Loading configuration

Log KI

Log

V

KIC

V fracture propagation velocityKI mode-I stress intensity factor K0 Stress corrosion limitKIC mode-I fracture toughnessn subcritical crack index (SCI)

Experimental setup

Testing protocolbull Three shale types

ndash Woodford Mancos Marcellusndash Also sandstones for comparisonintegration

bull Room dry CO2gas DI waterbull Varying salinity NaCl KClbull Varying pHbull Room temperature 65degC bull Some samples coated with hydrophobic

agent to limit fluidrock interaction to fracture tip 7

Shale sample composition

8

Mancos shale

Marcellus shale

Woodford shale

fsp

qtz

clay

dol

qtzfspcalclay

cal

dol

fsp

qtz

pyrite

25 microm

25 microm

25 microm

clay

Qtz clays fsp

Calcite Qtz clays carbonate

Fracture trace imaging

9

10 microm 20 microm 2 microm

Woodford Mancos Marcellus

Woodford Mancos intergranular (clay matrix)Marcellus intragranular (cleavage)

Fracture surface imaging

10Roughness variation but no plumose structureGrain boundary breakage vs transgranular breakage

300 microm

Marcellus shale

20 microm20 microm

500 microm

Mancos shale

cleavage

clay

clay

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

4

Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site

Active on 102 - 105 year time scales

5 cm

Methodologybull Experimental measurement of subcritical

fracture propagation in various shale lithologiesndash Double torsion test unconfined conditionsndash Short-rod test confined conditions (scCO2)

bull Textural and compositional characterizationndash Shale material used for fracture testingndash Post-mortem analysis of lab test specimensndash Fractures amp CO2 alteration in natural systems

bull Numerical modeling of fracture propagation in top sealsndash Fracture network modeling using JOINTSndash Upscaled modeling for top seal deformation using

Sierra Mechanics5

Mode-I fracture testing

6

Loading configuration

Log KI

Log

V

KIC

V fracture propagation velocityKI mode-I stress intensity factor K0 Stress corrosion limitKIC mode-I fracture toughnessn subcritical crack index (SCI)

Experimental setup

Testing protocolbull Three shale types

ndash Woodford Mancos Marcellusndash Also sandstones for comparisonintegration

bull Room dry CO2gas DI waterbull Varying salinity NaCl KClbull Varying pHbull Room temperature 65degC bull Some samples coated with hydrophobic

agent to limit fluidrock interaction to fracture tip 7

Shale sample composition

8

Mancos shale

Marcellus shale

Woodford shale

fsp

qtz

clay

dol

qtzfspcalclay

cal

dol

fsp

qtz

pyrite

25 microm

25 microm

25 microm

clay

Qtz clays fsp

Calcite Qtz clays carbonate

Fracture trace imaging

9

10 microm 20 microm 2 microm

Woodford Mancos Marcellus

Woodford Mancos intergranular (clay matrix)Marcellus intragranular (cleavage)

Fracture surface imaging

10Roughness variation but no plumose structureGrain boundary breakage vs transgranular breakage

300 microm

Marcellus shale

20 microm20 microm

500 microm

Mancos shale

cleavage

clay

clay

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Methodologybull Experimental measurement of subcritical

fracture propagation in various shale lithologiesndash Double torsion test unconfined conditionsndash Short-rod test confined conditions (scCO2)

bull Textural and compositional characterizationndash Shale material used for fracture testingndash Post-mortem analysis of lab test specimensndash Fractures amp CO2 alteration in natural systems

bull Numerical modeling of fracture propagation in top sealsndash Fracture network modeling using JOINTSndash Upscaled modeling for top seal deformation using

Sierra Mechanics5

Mode-I fracture testing

6

Loading configuration

Log KI

Log

V

KIC

V fracture propagation velocityKI mode-I stress intensity factor K0 Stress corrosion limitKIC mode-I fracture toughnessn subcritical crack index (SCI)

Experimental setup

Testing protocolbull Three shale types

ndash Woodford Mancos Marcellusndash Also sandstones for comparisonintegration

bull Room dry CO2gas DI waterbull Varying salinity NaCl KClbull Varying pHbull Room temperature 65degC bull Some samples coated with hydrophobic

agent to limit fluidrock interaction to fracture tip 7

Shale sample composition

8

Mancos shale

Marcellus shale

Woodford shale

fsp

qtz

clay

dol

qtzfspcalclay

cal

dol

fsp

qtz

pyrite

25 microm

25 microm

25 microm

clay

Qtz clays fsp

Calcite Qtz clays carbonate

Fracture trace imaging

9

10 microm 20 microm 2 microm

Woodford Mancos Marcellus

Woodford Mancos intergranular (clay matrix)Marcellus intragranular (cleavage)

Fracture surface imaging

10Roughness variation but no plumose structureGrain boundary breakage vs transgranular breakage

300 microm

Marcellus shale

20 microm20 microm

500 microm

Mancos shale

cleavage

clay

clay

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Mode-I fracture testing

6

Loading configuration

Log KI

Log

V

KIC

V fracture propagation velocityKI mode-I stress intensity factor K0 Stress corrosion limitKIC mode-I fracture toughnessn subcritical crack index (SCI)

Experimental setup

Testing protocolbull Three shale types

ndash Woodford Mancos Marcellusndash Also sandstones for comparisonintegration

bull Room dry CO2gas DI waterbull Varying salinity NaCl KClbull Varying pHbull Room temperature 65degC bull Some samples coated with hydrophobic

agent to limit fluidrock interaction to fracture tip 7

Shale sample composition

8

Mancos shale

Marcellus shale

Woodford shale

fsp

qtz

clay

dol

qtzfspcalclay

cal

dol

fsp

qtz

pyrite

25 microm

25 microm

25 microm

clay

Qtz clays fsp

Calcite Qtz clays carbonate

Fracture trace imaging

9

10 microm 20 microm 2 microm

Woodford Mancos Marcellus

Woodford Mancos intergranular (clay matrix)Marcellus intragranular (cleavage)

Fracture surface imaging

10Roughness variation but no plumose structureGrain boundary breakage vs transgranular breakage

300 microm

Marcellus shale

20 microm20 microm

500 microm

Mancos shale

cleavage

clay

clay

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Testing protocolbull Three shale types

ndash Woodford Mancos Marcellusndash Also sandstones for comparisonintegration

bull Room dry CO2gas DI waterbull Varying salinity NaCl KClbull Varying pHbull Room temperature 65degC bull Some samples coated with hydrophobic

agent to limit fluidrock interaction to fracture tip 7

Shale sample composition

8

Mancos shale

Marcellus shale

Woodford shale

fsp

qtz

clay

dol

qtzfspcalclay

cal

dol

fsp

qtz

pyrite

25 microm

25 microm

25 microm

clay

Qtz clays fsp

Calcite Qtz clays carbonate

Fracture trace imaging

9

10 microm 20 microm 2 microm

Woodford Mancos Marcellus

Woodford Mancos intergranular (clay matrix)Marcellus intragranular (cleavage)

Fracture surface imaging

10Roughness variation but no plumose structureGrain boundary breakage vs transgranular breakage

300 microm

Marcellus shale

20 microm20 microm

500 microm

Mancos shale

cleavage

clay

clay

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Shale sample composition

8

Mancos shale

Marcellus shale

Woodford shale

fsp

qtz

clay

dol

qtzfspcalclay

cal

dol

fsp

qtz

pyrite

25 microm

25 microm

25 microm

clay

Qtz clays fsp

Calcite Qtz clays carbonate

Fracture trace imaging

9

10 microm 20 microm 2 microm

Woodford Mancos Marcellus

Woodford Mancos intergranular (clay matrix)Marcellus intragranular (cleavage)

Fracture surface imaging

10Roughness variation but no plumose structureGrain boundary breakage vs transgranular breakage

300 microm

Marcellus shale

20 microm20 microm

500 microm

Mancos shale

cleavage

clay

clay

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Fracture trace imaging

9

10 microm 20 microm 2 microm

Woodford Mancos Marcellus

Woodford Mancos intergranular (clay matrix)Marcellus intragranular (cleavage)

Fracture surface imaging

10Roughness variation but no plumose structureGrain boundary breakage vs transgranular breakage

300 microm

Marcellus shale

20 microm20 microm

500 microm

Mancos shale

cleavage

clay

clay

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Fracture surface imaging

10Roughness variation but no plumose structureGrain boundary breakage vs transgranular breakage

300 microm

Marcellus shale

20 microm20 microm

500 microm

Mancos shale

cleavage

clay

clay

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Water content

11

Frac

ture

toug

hnes

s (M

Pa m

12 )

Water enhances subcritical fracturing for clay-rich shales Strong reduction of KIC (48) and SCI (75) with increasing water content K-V curves obey power-law indicating fracturing in stress-corrosion regime (I) Load relaxation technique (lines) matches constant loading rate method (squares)

Woodford shale 23degC

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Salinity

12

Woodford shale NaCl brine 23degC

Increase of fluid salinity increases KIC and SCI in clay-rich Woodford and Mancos shales

Less weakening in KCl brine than in NaCl brine Clay swelling

Uncoated

Coated

10-3

10-4

10-5

10-6

10-7

Stress Intensity Factor (MPa m12)

Frac

ture

Vel

ocity

(ms

)

0

02

04

06

0 03 06 09 12 15

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

Salt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 03 06 09 12 15

Subc

ritica

l Ind

exSalt concentration (M)

NaClKCl

Coated

Coated

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

pH

13

SCI decreases with decreasing pH for carbonate-rich Marcellus shale KIC is independent of pH SCI effect opposite to that in glass and quartzite Calcite dissolution

0

20

40

60

80

0 35 7 105 14Su

bcrit

ical I

ndex

pH

0

04

08

12

16

K IC

(MPa

m1

2 )

HCl H2O NaOH

Marcellus shale HCl solution 23degC

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Temperature

14

Increase in temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Left-ward shift for all shalesbull Concentration effects less

pronounced at elevated T

Marcellus DI water Woodford DI water

Woodford NaCl Woodford HCl

pH18017M01M

pH1pH3

Woodford 65degC

DI waterNaCl 017MHCl pH18

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Summary of K-V relations

15

WoodfordMancos

Marcellus

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

UncoatedCoated

log KI

log

V

log KI

log

V

Water pH Salinity Temperature

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Time-to-failure analysis

16

119905119905119891119891 = 119889119889119905119905 = 1198861198860

119886119886119891119891 119889119889119889119889119881119881

=2

120590120590211988411988421198701198700

119870119870119868119868119868119868 119870119870119881119881119889119889119870119870

119870119870 = 120590120590119884119884 119889119889

119881119881 = 119860119860119870119870119899119899

119905119905119891119891 =2

2 minus 119899119899 11986011986012059012059021198841198842 1198701198701198681198681198681198682minus119899119899 minus 11987011987002minus119899119899

Constant stress loading

rArr

rArr

Assume subcritical crack growth limit 10-10 ms To meet safe storage timegt104 years σlt0004

MPa for wet σlt001 MPa for dry conditions Under σ=1 MPa failure occurs at 61 days for

wet 402 days for dry

Evans (1972) amp Nara et al (2015)

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

JOINTS modeling

17

bull Linear elastic Boundary element codebull Pseudo-3D accounts for elastic interaction

ndash Opening- and mixed-mode fracture propagationbull Allows simulation of fracture network development

as function of ndash Subcritical index (SCI) and KIC

ndash Elastic material propertiesndash Distribution of nucleation sites (seed fractures)

Plan and cross-section realizations

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Dry CO2 DI water 1 NaCl 10 NaCl Acid

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

JOINTS plan view

KIC (MParadicm)SCIνE (GPa)

100 m2

080690250

038140220

1195401528

1026401528

024140220

028110220

Qualitative differences in fracture network geometry in different chemical environmentsbull Number of fractures branching behavior curvature

1272601528

1185801528

029190220

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Fracture aperture distributionCO2 003 mmDI 029 mm

Medians 1 NaCl 003 mm10 NaCl 029 mmAcid 028 mm

DI 024 mmMedians 1 NaCl 020 mm

10 NaCl 025 mmAcid 025 mm

Woo

dfor

dM

arce

llus

bull 1 NaCl Fewer but wider fractures

bull Acid More seeds activated but smaller aperture

bull Less spread in aperture range for different test environments than Woodford

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

JOINTS cross sections

Woodford 1 NaCl029 MParadicm 19 20 GPa

Woodford 10 NaCl024 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

2 m

10 m

Woodford DI water038 MParadicm 14 20 GPa

Woodford acid028 MParadicm 11 20 GPa

Woodford dry CO2

080 MParadicm 69 50 GPa

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Summarybull Chemical environments rock mineralogy and temperature

influence shale fracture properties bull Larger wet-dry differences in clay-rich shales (Woodford and

Mancos) than in carbonate-rich shale (Marcellus)ndash ldquoWetrdquo fracture growth rate faster by one-order of magnitude

bull Increasing temperature enhances subcritical fracturingbull Carbonate-rich Marcellus carbonate dissolution

ndash SCI sensitive to acidic pHndash KIC independent of chemical environment

bull Woodford amp Mancos clay-water interactionndash KIC and SCI sensitive to water content and salinityndash Water-weakening enhances subcritical fracturing

bull Environmental effects controlled by competition between fracture growth rate and rate of rock degradation by fluid-rock interactions 21

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Implications for CO2 seal integritybull Dry tests potentially applicable to dry scCO2 systems

ndash Dry-out by CO2 injection expected to strengthen caprock

bull Increasing caprock failure risk with increasing temperature

bull Clay-rich caprocksndash More pronounced dry-out effectndash Lower risk for seal failure by subcritical fracture growth

in scCO2 systemndash High salinity strengthens caprock

bull Carbonate-rich caprocksndash More prone to subcritical fracture by pH decrease

through dissolution of CO2 in brine22

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Accomplishments to Date

bull Fracture mechanics testing on caprock lithologies in dry amp aqueous environments of varying composition varying temperature

bull Numerical simulations on fracture network evolution by chemically aided fracture growth

bull Simulated caprock leakage behavior using continuum models for varying well reservoircaprock geometry

23

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Next steps (in progress)

bull Short-rod fracture testing under confinement with scCO2

bull Upscaled seal failure amp leakage simulations ndash Integration of continuum amp fracture network

modeling

24

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Synergy Opportunities

bull Fracture mechanics analysis of Cranfieldand FutureGen II core material

bull Integration with tests of frictional behavior under chemically reactive conditions

bull Integration of results with fracture network modeling (phase-field cohesive end-zone peridynamics)

bull Integration with hydraulic fracture research

25

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Appendix

26

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

27

Benefit to the Program bull Program goals Develop characterization tools technologies andor

methodologies that improve the ability to predict geologic storage capacity within plusmn30 improve the utilization of the reservoir by understanding how faults and fractures in a reservoir affect the flow of CO2 and ensure storage permanencendash Area of Interest 2 ndash Fractured Reservoir and Seal Behavior Develop

tools and techniques to increase the accuracy and reduce the costs of assessing subsurface seal containment and the sealreservoir interface including the measurement of in-situ rock properties in order to develop a better understanding of seal behavior when CO2 is injected into a reservoir

bull Project is designed to ndash Provide calibrated and validated numerical predictive

tools for long-term prediction of reservoir seal integrity beyond the engineering (injection) time scale

ndash Contribute toward technology ensuring 99 storage permanence in the injection zone for 1000 years

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

28

Project Overview Goals and Objectives

bull Perform laboratory fracture mechanics testing to ndash gain fundamental understanding into fracture processes in chemically

reactive systems and to ndash provide input parameters on fracture constitutive behavior fracture

rate and geometry and deformation and transport processes involved in subcritical chemically assisted fracture growth for relevant top seal lithologies

bull Derive predictive and validated numerical models for fracture growth in chemically reactive environments relevant to CCUS top seal lithologies

bull Validate numerical amp laboratory observations against microstructural and textural observations on fractures from natural CO2 seeps

bull Perform upscaled numerical simulations that are informed by field and lab results toward predictive tools for top seal integrity analysis top seal mechanical failure and impact on CO2 leakage in CCUS applications

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

29

Organization Chart Communication Plan

bull Established Sandia-UT collaborationbull Olson ndashndash Eichhubl on joint industry projectsbull Dewers ndash Newell ndashEichhubl on joint EFRC

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Gantt Chart

Short-rod tests (task 21) are being performed under task 23 under confined conditions No-cost extension pending following discontinuity of funding for Sandia in PY 17

91

2014

-12

312

014

11

2015

-33

120

154

120

15-6

30

2015

71

2015

-93

020

1510

12

015-

123

120

151

120

16-3

31

2016

41

2016

-63

020

167

120

16-9

30

2016

101

201

6-12

31

2016

11

2017

-33

120

174

120

17-6

30

2017

71

2017

-83

120

1710

12

017-

123

120

171

120

18-2

31

2018

1 Project Management and Planning p p p21 Short rod fracture toughness tests 22 Double torsion tests p p23 Fracturing in water-bearing supercritical CO2 p p31 Field fracture characterization

32 Textural and compositional fracture imaging

41 Discrete fracture modeling using Sierra Mechanics p p p42 Fracture network modeling using JOINTS p p p43 Upscaled modeling using Kayenta

5 Model validation and integration p p p

TaskSubtask

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Bibliographybull Journal multiple authors

ndash P Newell M J Martinez P Eichhubl 2016 Impact of layer thickness and well orientation on caprock integrity for geologic carbon storage Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering available at httpdoi101016jpetrol201607032

ndash Chen X Eichhubl P Olson J E 2017 Effect of water on critical and subcritical fracture properties of Woodford shale Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth v 122 httpdxdoiorg1010022016JB013708

  • Area of Interest 2 Geomechanics of CO2 Reservoir SealsDE-FE0023316
  • Problem Statement
  • Permeability structure of conduit-barrier fault zone
  • Fractures in CO2 caprockCrystal Geyser field analog site
  • Methodology
  • Mode-I fracture testing
  • Testing protocol
  • Shale sample composition
  • Fracture trace imaging
  • Fracture surface imaging
  • Water content
  • Salinity
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Summary of K-V relations
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • JOINTS modeling
  • JOINTS plan view
  • Fracture aperture distribution
  • JOINTS cross sections
  • Summary
  • Implications for CO2 seal integrity
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Next steps (in progress)
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Appendix
  • Benefit to the Program
  • Project Overview Goals and Objectives
  • Organization Chart Communication Plan
  • Gantt Chart
  • Bibliography
  • Extra slides not for posting
  • Transient effect
  • Presentation Outline
  • Introduction
  • pH effect
  • Natural fracture networksMancos Shale at Crystal Geyser
  • Time-to-failure analysis
  • Mt Simon Sandstone
  • Sample Characterization
  • Mt Simon Ss
  • Slide Number 44
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Mt Simon fracture mechanics
  • Refs
  • Accomplishments to Date
  • Synergy Opportunities
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Summary
  • Benefit to the Program

Recommended