Date post: | 12-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | madeleine-terry |
View: | 228 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Ohio Healthcare Efficiencies Study Committee
Richard Shonk, MD, PhD
Chief Medical Officer
Who We Are
Neutral forum for all stakeholders
concerned with health and health care
Those paying for health care
Those providing health care
Those receiving health care
Those improving community health
Our Mission
To positively affect health status, experience, outcomes, and affordability by fostering a connected system of health care and community health through innovation, integration and informatics
What’s the Triple Aim?
3
1 2
BETT
ER C
ARE
LOW
ER O
VERALL C
OST
BETTER HEALTH
Collective Impact on Health
Health Care Costs Continue to Rise
And overall health is not improving 2013 State of American Well-Being; Gallup – Healthways Well-Being Index
42nd
49thKENTUCKY
OHIO
142 of 189:Community Well-Being
Where Did We Begin:Bold Goals For Our Region
Today 52% Today 82%
The Story of Our Top Scenarios…
• Initiatives with Impact • Income and Education
improvement• Healthy Behaviors• Continued Improvement in
Patient Centered Medical Home & Care Coordination
• Payment Reform
Action Teams & Steering Committee 2.0Proposed Action Teams:
Action Team StructureCo-Chairs: to reflect diversity, ideally members of current Steering Committee or Leadership Forum
Members: Additional Steering Comm. and Leadership Forum volunteers, subject experts, reps of current programs. Others to assure diversity of perspective, geography, race, and knowledge of current work in that area
Accountable to the Steering Comm. 2.0 to research strategies and recommend action plans
Healthy Behaviors
Care Delivery Bundle
Payment Reform and Financing
Other (TBD)
Other (TBD)
Steering Committee 2.0Chair: Sue McPartlinCo-Chairs: Sr. Sally Duffy, Dr. Lynne SaddlerMembers:
• Existing Steering Committee members • Action team co-chairs
Accountable to the community to assure action plans are sound, aligned, leveraged, address equity and mental health, and match agreed-upon decision criteria
The Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) Initiative
Primary Care Payment Model Shared Savings(2014-2016)
Care management pmpm; private health plans for commercial, MA, medicaid lines of
business
Care management
pmpm; “fee for service”
Medicare and Ohio Medicaid beneficiaries
Fee for Service + PMPM + Shared Savings = Total Reimbursement
CPCi Markets
Cincinnati/Dayton/Northern Kentucky Market
• 75 Practices• 1/3 Independent• 2/3 System
• 250 Physicians• 220,000 lives• 9 Payers
• Aetna• Anthem• Caresource• Centene/Buckeye• CMS• Humana• Medical Mutual• Ohio Medicaid• UnitedHealthcare
An Initiative of the Center for Medicare & Medicaid InnovationProject Timeline: 2013-2016
National Leaders in Primary Care Transformation
Regional Data Transparency
84,000 Patients
Received Care Management
42,000Shared Decisions
on Smoking Cessation Treatment
Patient Experienc
e
24/7 Access
to Medical Record
Shared Decision Making
Clinical Quality
Improvement
Care Managem
ent
220,000 Beneficiaries 250 Providers 9 Health Plans
Medicare Outcomes to Date:
Measure % decrease
Overall Hospital Admissions-8%
Primary-Care-Treatable Admissions-10%
Readmissions-3%
Overall Expenditures-3.4%
Patient-centered medical homes Episode-based payments
Goal 80-90 percent of Ohio’s population in some value-based payment model (combination of episodes- and population-based payment) within five years
Year 1▪ In 2015 focus on Comprehensive Primary
Care Initiative (CPCi)
▪ Payers agree to participate in design for elements where standardization and/or alignment is critical
▪ Multi-payer group begins enrollment strategy for one additional market
Year 3
Year 5
▪ State leads design of five episodes: asthma
(acute exacerbation), perinatal, COPD
exacerbation, PCI, and joint replacement
▪ Payers agree to participate in design
process, launch reporting on at least
3 of 5 episodes in 2014 and tie to payment
within year
▪ Model rolled out to all major markets
▪ 50% of patients are enrolled
▪ 20 episodes defined and launched across payers
▪ Scale achieved state-wide
▪ 80% of patients are enrolled
▪ 50+ episodes defined and launched across payers
State’s Role▪ Shift rapidly to PCMH and episode model in Medicaid fee-for-service▪ Require Medicaid MCO partners to participate and implement▪ Incorporate into contracts of MCOs for state employee benefit program
5-Year Goal for Payment Innovation
Already Local Support for Public Reporting & Transparency
17
Primary Care Providers • Cardiovascular Health
• Colon Cancer Screening Rates
• Diabetes Management
• Patient Experience
Hospital • Effectiveness• Patient Experience• Emergency Department
PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY
What gets measured, gets improved
Collaborative Community Health Needs Assessment
Collaborative CHNA: Community stakeholder meetings
Regional Data Aggregation;A Comprehensive View to
Support Comprehensive Care
Why an Aggregated Claims Database?
Need for a neutral, trusted, local source of truth- no one Payor or Provider has the whole picture
Payment is proceeding to “payment for value” from “fee for service” Community-wide view of cost and utilization for decision support and benchmarking
Consistent and Continuous methodology is needed to monitor progress year over year
CPC Data High Level
Those Providing Healthcare
Labs
Primary Care
Hospital
EMSSpecialists
Pharmacy
ShareCommunity wide view of patient data
IntegrateEHR data insertion and extraction
NotifyTimely delivery ofpatient events
AnalyzeProvide actionable measurements of data
Government Insurance
Employers
Patients
Private Insurance
Those Paying for Healthcare
SUMMARY
Models like PCMH are changing the way care is delivered and paid for
We have an opportunity to use data to guide and inform health care decision
We offer tools for employers to drive high quality care
Our region’s Collective Impact strategy on Health unites the community
RECOMMENDATIONS1: Support health improvement organizations that meet the following criteria:
a.) multi-stakeholderb.) neutral convenersc.) data capable
2: Recognize the importance of regional data utilities that ensure health care information is readily available and trusted.
3: Support efforts of State Innovation Model to transition to greater emphasis on Payment for Value and less emphasis on Fee For Service.
4: Seek to align goals, measures and incentives with those of CMS and the private sector to increase signal strength across Ohio.
Who are the members?
Who are the members?
• 120+ Care Partners
• 100+ Business Partners
The ReThink Health Model
• Shared Understanding of • Possible initiatives• Outcomes over time• Cost of effort
CPCi Overview
• The Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) initiative is a multi-payer initiative fostering
collaboration between public and private health care payers to strengthen primary care.
Medicare will work with commercial and State health insurance plans and offer bonus payments to primary care doctors who better coordinate care for their patients.
34
Project Timeline
OH-KY Health Collaborative Project Timeline (September 2015)
Define data speci-fications; publish
DSG
Test secure file transmission
Update tHC & Onpoint systems for OH-KY CPCi
Receive test & historical files from data con-
tributors
tHC & Onpoint as-sign Enterprise IDs
Aggregate histori-cal data from data
contributors
Define, build, produce, & test
measures set
Build & deliver pivot tables to
include identified measures
17 MAR 9 MAY 8 JUNE 15 SEPT 20 OCT 9 NOV 19 NOV 8 DEC
Data Strategy
Analytic Services
Clinical/Claims Measures
Exchange ServicesHL7 Exchange Results Delivery, State Reported Meaningful Use
Innovation ServicesED/IP Alerts, Identity Management,
Meaningful Use Continuity of Care Document (CCD) Exchange, Health Information Service Provider (HISP)
HIE Evolution
Connectivity
Message Delivery
Online Repository
Information/Insight
“The goal is to turn data into information, and information into insight.”
-Carly Fiorina
Transactional Research