+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ARLY INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR ACUTE CARTILAGE INJURY...

ARLY INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR ACUTE CARTILAGE INJURY...

Date post: 09-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Figure 2 - Relative expressions of (A) miR-140, (B) miR-125b, and (C) miR-27b, in cartilage at 8 hours after impact injury and treatment. Groups with the same letter are significantly different from each other (p<0.05). Figure 1- Relative expressions of (A) IL-1β, (B) TNF-α, (C) ADAMTS-4, (D) ADAMTS-5, and (E) MMP-3 in cartilage at 8 hours after impact injury and treatment. Groups with the same letter are significantly different from each other (p<0.05). EARLY INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR ACUTE CARTILAGE INJURY : AN EX-VIVO PORCINE KNEE MODEL Genemaras, A 2 ; Ennis, H 1 ; Huang, CY 2 ; Kaplan, L 1 [1] Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Sports Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL [2] Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL Contact: [email protected] Traumatic injury to cartilage has been shown to lead to Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis (PTOA)[1]. The acute phase of PTOA is characterized with increased expression of aggrecanases and inflammatory cytokines in the injured cartilage [2]. Early intervention therapies aim to be administered during the acute phase for the prevention of PTOA development. Our objective was to determine the effect of Interleukin Receptor Antagonist Protein (IRAP), Hyaluronan (HA), Dexamethasone (DEX), and Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) treatment as early intervention strategies by examining the changes in microRNA (miRNA) and mRNA expression in cartilage at 8 hours after impact injury. INTRODUCTION The results of this study support the hypothesis by demonstrating that therapeutic early intervention during the acute phase of injury can significantly alter the genetic injury response in injured cartilage. HA and MSC treatment did not have any effect on the inflammatory and catabolic response of injured cartilage within the first 8 hours of injury. However, the beneficial effects of HA may take place beyond the acute time frame as suggested by increased miR-125b and miR-140 expressions after treatment. IRAP treatment increased expressions of miR-140, - 125b, and -27b in cartilage, indicating increased inhibition of ADAMTS-5, ADAMTS-4, and MMP-13, respectively [4,5,6] as shown by reduced aggrecanase and inflammatory genetic expressions. As a corticosteroid, DEX passes freely through the chondrocyte cell and nuclear membrane and binds to an intracellular glucocorticoid receptor [7] and directly inhibits the up-regulation of aggrecanases and inflammatory cytokines at the transcriptional level, thereby not modulating expressions of the miRNAs examined. Clinically, these findings support the potential of early intervention strategies for the prevention of cartilage degeneration after impact injury. DISCUSSION Custom impact device was used to create replicable injury ex-vivo to intact porcine knee joint [3]. Injury was caused by dropping a 10kg weight one time from 1m directly above the knee in extension. One hour after impact 20μg/mL IRAP (n=5), 15mg/mL HA (MW 1.9 MDa) (n=4), 4mg/ml DEX (n=5) or 5x10^6 P4 MSCs (n=3) in 1mL saline was intra-articularly injected. Control legs (no injury) (n=22) and injury legs (injury, no treatment) (n=5) received saline injection. At 8 hours post-injury, cartilage samples were harvested for genetic expression analysis. Genetic expression of miR-140 (regulates ADAMTS-5) miR-125b (regulates ADAMTS-4), miR-27b (regulates MMP-13), ADAMTS-4, ADAMTS-5, MMP-3, IL-1β, and TNF-α were analyzed by RT- PCR. Groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. A p- value <0.05 was considered significant. MATERIALS & METHODS Expressions of IL-1β and TNF-α in cartilage were significantly decreased in IRAP and DEX-treated joints as compared to injury (both ANOVA p<0.001) (Figure 1A & B). Expression of ADAMTS-4 was significantly lower in DEX-treated joints as compared to injury and HA-treated joints (ANOVA p<0.001) (Figure 1C). Expressions of ADAMTS-5 and MMP-3 were significantly lower in DEX- and IRAP-treated cartilage as compared to injury, MSC, and HA groups (ANOVA both p<0.001) (Figure 1D & E). Expression of miR-140 in cartilage was significantly up-regulated after IRAP treatment as compared to control, injury, MSC, and DEX groups (ANOVA p<0.001) (Figure 2A). After HA treatment, miR-140 expression was also significantly up-regulated as compared to control and injury. Expressions of miR-125b and miR-27b were significantly up-regulated after IRAP and HA treatment as compared to control, injury, MSC, and DEX groups (both ANOVA p<0.001) (Figure 2B & C). RESULTS [1]Brown TD et al. J Ortho Trauma. 2006 [2]Bigoni M et al. J Ortho Res. 2013 [3]Genemaras A et al. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2015. [4]Miyaki S et al. Genes and Dev 2010. [5]Matsukawa T et al. Arthritis Res and Ther 2013. [6] Akhtar N et al. Arthritis Rheum 2010. [7]Joyce DA et al. J Interferon Ctyokine Res 1996 REFERENCES This research was funded by philanthropic gifts to UHealth Sports Performance and Wellness Institute, and the Florida Education Fund. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Transcript
Page 1: ARLY INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR ACUTE CARTILAGE INJURY …apps.sportsmed.org/meetings/am2015/files/Poster_21.pdf · cartilage at 8 hours after impact injury. • The results of this

Figure 2 - Relative expressions of (A) miR-140, (B) miR-125b, and (C) miR-27b, in

cartilage at 8 hours after impact injury and treatment. Groups with the same letter

are significantly different from each other (p<0.05).

Figure 1- Relative expressions of (A) IL-1β, (B) TNF-α, (C) ADAMTS-4, (D)

ADAMTS-5, and (E) MMP-3 in cartilage at 8 hours after impact injury and treatment.

Groups with the same letter are significantly different from each other (p<0.05).

EARLY INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR ACUTE CARTILAGE INJURY: AN EX-VIVO PORCINE KNEE MODEL

Genemaras, A2 ; Ennis, H1 ; Huang, CY2 ; Kaplan, L1 [1] Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Sports Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL

[2] Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL

Contact: [email protected]

• Traumatic injury to cartilage has been shown to

lead to Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis (PTOA)[1].

• The acute phase of PTOA is characterized with

increased expression of aggrecanases and

inflammatory cytokines in the injured cartilage [2].

• Early intervention therapies aim to be

administered during the acute phase for the

prevention of PTOA development.

• Our objective was to determine the effect of

Interleukin Receptor Antagonist Protein (IRAP),

Hyaluronan (HA), Dexamethasone (DEX), and

Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) treatment as early

intervention strategies by examining the changes

in microRNA (miRNA) and mRNA expression in

cartilage at 8 hours after impact injury.

INTRODUCTION • The results of this study support the hypothesis by

demonstrating that therapeutic early intervention

during the acute phase of injury can significantly alter

the genetic injury response in injured cartilage.

• HA and MSC treatment did not have any effect on

the inflammatory and catabolic response of injured

cartilage within the first 8 hours of injury. However,

the beneficial effects of HA may take place beyond

the acute time frame as suggested by increased

miR-125b and miR-140 expressions after treatment.

• IRAP treatment increased expressions of miR-140, -

125b, and -27b in cartilage, indicating increased

inhibition of ADAMTS-5, ADAMTS-4, and MMP-13,

respectively [4,5,6] as shown by reduced

aggrecanase and inflammatory genetic expressions.

• As a corticosteroid, DEX passes freely through the

chondrocyte cell and nuclear membrane and binds to

an intracellular glucocorticoid receptor [7] and

directly inhibits the up-regulation of aggrecanases

and inflammatory cytokines at the transcriptional

level, thereby not modulating expressions of the

miRNAs examined.

• Clinically, these findings support the potential of early

intervention strategies for the prevention of cartilage

degeneration after impact injury.

DISCUSSION

• Custom impact device was used to create

replicable injury ex-vivo to intact porcine knee joint

[3]. Injury was caused by dropping a 10kg weight

one time from 1m directly above the knee in

extension.

• One hour after impact 20µg/mL IRAP (n=5),

15mg/mL HA (MW 1.9 MDa) (n=4), 4mg/ml DEX

(n=5) or 5x10^6 P4 MSCs (n=3) in 1mL saline was

intra-articularly injected. Control legs (no injury)

(n=22) and injury legs (injury, no treatment) (n=5)

received saline injection.

• At 8 hours post-injury, cartilage samples were

harvested for genetic expression analysis. Genetic

expression of miR-140 (regulates ADAMTS-5)

miR-125b (regulates ADAMTS-4), miR-27b

(regulates MMP-13), ADAMTS-4, ADAMTS-5,

MMP-3, IL-1β, and TNF-α were analyzed by RT-

PCR.

• Groups were compared by one-way analysis of

variance followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. A p-

value <0.05 was considered significant.

MATERIALS & METHODS

• Expressions of IL-1β and TNF-α in cartilage were significantly decreased in IRAP and DEX-treated joints as compared to injury (both ANOVA

p<0.001) (Figure 1A & B).

• Expression of ADAMTS-4 was significantly lower in DEX-treated joints as compared to injury and HA-treated joints (ANOVA p<0.001)

(Figure 1C). Expressions of ADAMTS-5 and MMP-3 were significantly lower in DEX- and IRAP-treated cartilage as compared to injury, MSC,

and HA groups (ANOVA both p<0.001) (Figure 1D & E).

• Expression of miR-140 in cartilage was significantly up-regulated after IRAP treatment as compared to control, injury, MSC, and DEX groups

(ANOVA p<0.001) (Figure 2A). After HA treatment, miR-140 expression was also significantly up-regulated as compared to control and

injury.

• Expressions of miR-125b and miR-27b were significantly up-regulated after IRAP and HA treatment as compared to control, injury, MSC,

and DEX groups (both ANOVA p<0.001) (Figure 2B & C).

RESULTS

[1]Brown TD et al. J Ortho Trauma. 2006 [2]Bigoni M et al. J

Ortho Res. 2013 [3]Genemaras A et al. Osteoarthritis and

Cartilage, 2015. [4]Miyaki S et al. Genes and Dev 2010.

[5]Matsukawa T et al. Arthritis Res and Ther 2013. [6] Akhtar N

et al. Arthritis Rheum 2010. [7]Joyce DA et al. J Interferon

Ctyokine Res 1996

REFERENCES

This research was funded by philanthropic gifts to UHealth

Sports Performance and Wellness Institute, and the Florida

Education Fund.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Recommended