+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Art%20of%20War

Art%20of%20War

Date post: 09-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: dan-mason
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 14

Transcript
  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    1/14

    22 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    C O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R Y

    Sun Zi Art of War: Be

    Proactive, Ever Ready andDistance Yourself from

    the Competitors

    Sun Zi Art of War (Sun Zi Bingfa ) is the most

    well-known Chinese military treatise among the Chinese

    as well the western world. Reportedly written around the

    4th B.C., its value in inuencing military thinking and war

    strategies has seldom been questioned. What is more

    interesting, however, is its relevance to the corporate

    world. Increasingly, military clichs have been used in

    the business realm and corporate boardrooms. Terms

    like price wars, promotion wars, battle of the corporate

    giants, etc. have found increasing acceptance and usage

    among business writers and analysis. The aim of this

    paper is to introduce readers to the value embedded in

    ancient Chinese military philosophy like Sun Zi Art of War,

    and how such philosophy can be applied to the realm

    of marketing and corporate strategy. Given the richness

    of the contents of Sun Zi Art of War, it is impossible to

    provide a comprehensive treatment of his works. As such,

    this paper has chosen to focus on two related concepts

    of his writing - the need to be ready and proactive at all

    times and to distance oneself from the competitors.

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    2/14

    23 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    Introduction

    Military strategies have often appealed to corporate strategists.

    The honouring of war heroes like Colin Powell and Norman

    Schwarzkopf of the Persian Gulf War of 1991 and the hefty lecture

    fees they command in the speaking circuits of the business world

    attest to the popularity of applying military strategies and principles

    to the business world. What is interesting to note is that much of

    modern military thought might have been inspired by an ancient

    Chinese military treatise, called Sun Zi Art of War. Written around

    4th B.C., this highly regarded work is a must-read text among

    most top military academies of the world, including those in the

    United States. Indeed, Sun Zi Art of Warremains one of the most

    inspiring books on military thought and philosophy that has oftenbeen associated with applications to business. Its contents have

    commonly been cited by many businessmen in Asia and the west

    who claimed great inspirations from the book.

    With the growing economic importance of China, the interest

    on things Chinese and understanding the mind of the Chinese

    strategist will become increasingly popular. Chinese military classics

    like Sun Zi Art of Warprovides a useful perspective in this aspect.

    This paper hopes to contribute towards this understanding by

    focusing on two related concepts of his writing - the need to be

    ready and proactive at all times and to distance oneself from the

    competitors. How these concepts are used in war, and how it can

    be similarly applied to business are illustrated. To promote better

    understanding of the philosophy of Sun Zi, his original writings

    are quoted withhanyu pinyin ( ), the commonly accepted

    romanised and phonetic version of pronouncing Chinese

    characters, are included in the paper as well.

    The Quest For Dominance

    In war, one of the driving motivations behind any army is to

    dominate its enemies decisively so that none of them can pose any

    serious threat to it. This philosophy for dominance has been clearly

    articulated by Sun Zi in his Chapter 11 on the Nine Battlegrounds(jiu di ) when he described the power of the supreme

    commander or emperor as follows:

    Fu ba wang zhi bing, fa da guo, ze qi zhong bu de ju

    When a supreme emperor (commander) attacks a large state,

    he ensures that it is impossible for the enemy to assemble all his

    forces against him.

    Wee Chow Hou

    Wei jia yu di, ze qi jiao bu de he

    He will overpower his enemy convincingly and overawe the other

    states so much that none of the allies (of his enemy) would dare

    unite against him.

    Shi gu bu zheng tian xia zhi jiao, bu yang tian xia zhi quan

    Thus, he (the supreme emperor) does not have to contend with

    securing alliances with other states. He does not have to foster nor

    cultivate the power of other states.

    Xin yi zhi si, wei jia yu di gu qi cheng ke ba, qi guo ke hui

    Rather, he relies on his supreme ability to overpower the enemy

    to achieve his own agenda and goals. Thus, he is able to conquer

    cities and overthrow the states of his enemies.

    Note that the supreme emperor (ba wang ) did not even

    have to enter into strategic alliances with his enemies. He was so

    powerful that his mighty army alone would overawe all his enemies1.

    Of course, the position of the supreme emperor (ba wang )

    reects the ideal state or goal that an ambitious military commander

    would seek to achieve. In reality, no matter how ambitious an army

    may be, it will always have to contend with counter forces that

    will challenge its position. Moreover, not every army can be in the

    commanding position all the time. For example, the British used to

    be a very powerful nation, especially in the 18th and 19th centuries.

    It colonised many countries, including Australia, Canada and New

    Zealand. It was so domineering that it called itself the Great Britain,

    and it created the Commonwealth countries. However, by the end

    of the 20th century, its inuence gradually waned. Many of its former

    colonies broke away to become independent nations. By the 21st

    century, it could hardly be called the Great Britain anymore.

    Competition in the business world is very similar to that of

    the military realm. Given any opportunity, a company will seek to

    dominate or even monopolise the whole industry. Yet, the nature

    of competition plus the intervention of regulatory controls are such

    that a company will always have to contend with various direct and

    indirect competitors. While it may lead the industry for a while, its

    position can never be assured as many of its competitors will

    1 In the modern world, despite its dominant military power at the turn of the 21stcentury, the United States has yet to achieve the status of the supreme

    emperor. It still has to rely on its strategic political and military partners, and cannot go about to conduct its affairs without taking into account the

    reactions of other nations around the world. A good example was the case of its attempt to attack Iraq in late 2002. It began seeking the support of its

    allies and the United Nations as early as July/August 2002, and it presented all kinds of reasons and excuses for the attack. Not surprisingly, it met with

    much resistance from the rest of the world, especially from the Arabic and Islamic countries. Only Britain stood rmly behind the United States and no

    attack was launched by the United States as of early December 2002.

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    3/14

    24 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    constantly seek to dislodge its leadership. Moreover, changes in

    market conditions, consumer tastes and preferences, technology,

    and many other factors could also threaten its ability to stay ahead

    of its competitors all the time.

    Take the case of the personal computer (PC) industry. While

    Dell Computers remained the number one PC company in the

    United States as of mid-2002, its worldwide leadership position was

    dislodged as a result of the merger between Hewlett Packard (HP)

    and Compaq earlier in that year. If anything, competition between

    the two giants had become more intense than ever. For example,

    in August 2002, Dell announced plans to market unbranded

    (generic) PCs through dealers and to enter the lucrative printers

    and handheld computers (like the palm-tops) markets. Printers

    and handheld computers were the traditional markets and forte ofHP. By making plans to enter these markets, Dell was effectively

    declaring war against HP. Of course, HP promptly returned salvo

    against Dell. The president of HP, Michael Capellas, announced

    later in that same month that HP would target its sales efforts at

    direct sales to customers, the traditional domain and forte of Dell.

    Clearly, these two dominant PC players are going after each other

    and the competition is likely to intensify in the years ahead.

    Be Proactive at All Times and Situations

    How then can an army or a business outt remain competitive so as

    not to enter the history book? How can it ensure that its leadership

    or competitive position will not be threatened? More importantly,

    what kind of competitive stance or posture should it take in order to

    ensure that it does not fall into a state of complacency? These are

    all important issues that need to be addressed.

    Effective military doctrine dictates that the best way to deter any

    attacks from the enemy is to have a very strong force for offence

    as well as for defense. This would include having strong military

    equipment and ring power, well-trained troops and preferably, a

    larger army2 too. When war breaks out between two contesting

    armies, one must never rely on the failure of the enemy to attack him.

    Instead, one must be ever ready to engage the enemy.

    Similarly, one must also build an invincible defense such that

    the enemy would not even dare to mount any attack. Even if the

    enemy dares to do so, he will have to pay a high price for it. In

    other words, whether in offence or defense, there is a need to

    adopt a very proactive stance. For example, to attack successfully,

    one must know the disposition and layout of the defenses of the

    enemy, his strengths and weaknesses, state of combat-readiness,

    etc. To defend successfully, one must be able to predict accurately

    where the enemy is likely to attack. In this way, one can build a

    defense that is so strong that the enemy would not even dare

    to contemplate an attack. The need to be proactive had been

    expressed in many parts ofSun Zi Bingfa ( ). In this paper,

    I like to focus on what Sun Zi said in his Chapter 8 on Variations and

    Adaptability(jiu bian ):

    Gu yong bing zhi fa, wu shi qi bu lai, shi wu you yi dai ye

    Thus, in the conduct of war, one must not rely on the failure of the

    enemy to come, but on the readiness of oneself to engage him.

    Wu shi qi bu gong, shi wu you suo bu ke gong ye

    One must not rely on the failure of the enemy to attack, but on the

    ability of oneself to build an invincible defense that is invulnerable

    to attacks.

    To excel in war, one has to be proactive so as to be ahead of

    the enemy at every move. It is very important to emphasise that in

    the realm of the military, the army must always maintain a highly

    vigilant state of combat-readiness. As appropriately pointed out

    by Sun Zi, one cannot rely on the future of the enemy to attack us.

    Instead, one must be ever-readyto take on the enemy. Even when

    there is no war, troops are trained to the highest level of combat-

    tness and readiness inpeacetime. In fact, it is during peacetime

    that the army can seize on the opportunity to build up its resources

    so as to act as a deterrent to any hostile move by the enemy. The

    following Chinese saying sums up this point well:

    Lian bing qian ri, yong bing yi ke

    Troops are trained for thousands of days for a moment of

    engagement.

    This need to be combat-ready all the time is well understood

    by any military commander. By being proactive, he is able not only

    to gain the initiative, but will have ample time and opportunity to

    deal with the enemy. In other words, he will have more options

    and can respond more rationally and effectively under almost

    all circumstances. Moreover, when he has the upper hand, his

    enemy will always have to be wary of him and be forced into taking

    a defensive stance. On the other hand, if he adopts a reactive

    posture, he can be lured into a false state of security as non-conict

    or non-hostility does not mean that the enemy is not secretly

    preparing to go on the offensive against him. More seriously, when

    pressured under the constraint of time, he is unlikely to come up

    with effective strategies. In fact, he will be under severe stress,

    resulting in tension and even disunity within his rank-and-le. In

    the worst case scenario, he could even be overthrown by his own

    people and / or troops.

    C O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R Y

    2 In war, while the size of the army (that is, numerical superiority) will provide some denite advantages, it is not sufcient to guarantee victory.

    What is more important is the quality of the troops and weaponry. This is where training becomes important. This point is emphasised in the Chapter

    on Mastering Points-of-Contact under the discussion on Relative Superiority.

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    4/14

    26 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    C O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R Y

    Understand the Need to be Proactive and

    Combat-Ready

    The need to be proactive and combat-ready all the time is

    readily understood and grasped by any shrewd military general.

    The same, however, cannot be said about its applications in the

    business realm. In my many years of teaching this subject to

    thousands of executives around the world, many of them still fail to

    comprehend the subtlety and implications behind the sayings by

    Sun Zi. Let me illustrate with the kinds of questions that I posed to

    my past course participants, beginning with an easy one.

    If your company is ranked, say, number two, three or four in

    prots, market share, service quality or some other dimension in the

    industry, a particular market, or product/service area, what would

    your goal or ambition be? The obvious answer, of course, is thatyou would want to be the number one, especially if your company

    has the capability of doing so. Any forward-looking and ambitious

    company would denitely aspire to become number one in market

    share, prots, service, quality image, etc. In fact, if it can and is

    able to be number one on all these dimensions, it would want to

    dominate them all.

    Now, what if you are already the number one, say in market

    share, prots, image, service quality or a combination of these

    aspects? What would your next goal or objective be? This is where I

    often got very interesting responses from executives whom I lectured

    to around the world. The following are some typical answers:

    1. Defend the number one position.

    2. Protect the number one position (whether this is in terms of

    prots, market share or some other criteria).

    3. Guard against the competitors.

    4. Maintain the leadership position.

    5. Sustain the number one position.

    6. Try to remain as number one.

    7. Stay number one3.

    Now, if you happen to provide one of the above responses, letme say that you are only half-right. By saying half-right, I mean you

    are half wrong and your answer is incomplete! This is because all

    the above answers are passive, defensive and reactive responses!

    In actual fact, being number one, you are effectively the leader. As

    a leader, your main role is to lead. However, if you have a passive,

    defensive and reactive mindset, you are likely to end up behaving

    likewise, that is, following instead of leading. This effectively

    violates the sayings as advocated by Sun Zi. Let me illustrate with

    an example.

    I was once called in by a company for some training cum

    consulting assignment. This company was in a business whereby

    the nature of the product was fairlyhomogeneous. As such, it

    was difcult to differentiate the product among competitors, and

    consumers tended to be attracted by the lowest price offered.

    The industry was also oligopolistic in nature (that is, only a few

    players). This company had the largest market share, and hence

    was theindustry leader4. Interestingly, the other competitors in

    the industry would occasionally harass the leader by taking turns

    to drop their prices by a few percentage points. This went on for

    some time. Each time when one of the smaller players dropped its

    price, the industry leader would call its own meeting to decide on

    counter strategies. Unfortunately, the corporate executives were

    too concerned about defending and protecting their market share

    and customers that they forgot how to lead anymore! They behavedalong the seven responses highlighted earlier. As a result, each

    time when one of the smaller players dropped its price, the industry

    also decided to drop the price by the same margin. What had

    happened? The leader had become a follower!

    Fortunately, it did not take me too long to convince the

    company that as an industry leader, it is its role tolead the industry

    up and to lead the industry down if necessary. To put it bluntly

    and brutally, if the smaller players want to commit commercial

    suicide, the industry leader should oblige them by conducting their

    corporate funerals rst. Of course, my advice to them was not that

    devastating. Instead, we decided to teach the smaller players a

    lesson, and then to lead them back into protability again. This was

    what happened.

    The next time around when one of the smaller players decided

    to drop price, the leader announced a substantially larger price

    drop. In the past, it would simply match the drop. At the same

    time, it leaked information to the industry that should any of the

    smaller players decide to match its price drop, it would drop it even

    further. Suddenly, all the other smaller players realised that they had

    annoyed the giant who had awakened. All the industry players took

    the words of the leader seriously, as any further aggravation of the

    price war would denitely cause the demise of the smaller players

    and favour the biggest player.

    This logic is not difcult to understand. In an oligopolistic

    industry where the product is fairly homogeneous, economies

    of scale typically favours the biggest player, that is, the biggest

    player has the lowest cost of production (see footnote 4). More

    importantly, if one of the smaller players exits the market, its market

    share will be distributed among the remaining players. All things

    being equal, it is likely to favour the biggest player as it probably

    3 Of course, at times, I do get other extreme answers like kill the number two and eliminate all competitors. These answers, to my mind, are rather

    ruthless and questionable responses in the realm of business competition and are likely to evoke strong reactions from any commentator and critic.

    4 It is important to point out that in such a market situation, economies of scale will always favour the biggest competitor. As such, it enjoys great cost

    advantage and has more leeway to lower price in order to take advantage of the price-sensitive consumers.

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    5/14

    27 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    has the largest distribution outlets. When this happens, its (the

    biggest player) cost curve will be pushed down further and its

    competitiveness enhanced.

    Having taught the smaller players a lesson, the industry leader

    then decided to lead them back into protability. It announced a

    price increase of about 10 per cent that would only take effect

    about one month after the date of announcement. This move was

    strategic. It was a way of signalling to the rest of the industry players

    about the intention to lead them out of the woods. Should the

    other players choose not to follow, the leader would still have ample

    time to change his mind closer to the date of implementation.

    Not surprisingly, all the other industry players announced similar

    price increases to be effected at the same date, all within a few

    days after the announcement by the leader. After been disciplined,they were in fact, waiting for the leader to make the rst move.

    The above example illustrates the behaviour of companies

    in industries like retail gasoline where the product is basically

    homogeneous and the industry is served by a few players (that is, an

    oligopolistic market structure). Typically, within a particular market, the

    leading producer would dominate by virtue of its size and extensive

    distribution outlets. It is very difcult for the smaller players to wage

    an open price war against the leader. This is because they risk being

    clobbered by the leader. The retail gasoline industry in Singapore

    is a good illustration. Few of the smaller players (e.g. Caltex, British

    Petroleum and Exxon) would like to take on Shell directly on a price

    war. This is because the market share of Shell is more than double

    that of its nearest rival at any one time.

    It is true that for global companies like Shell, Caltex, British

    Petroleum and Exxon, they can still wage price wars within a

    particular market or region by adopting a cross-subsidy strategy in

    order to buy into market share. However, there is still a limit to its

    success. This is because each market or region must still account

    for its bottom line in the medium and long run. While some losses

    may be acceptable in the short run, no other market or region is

    prepared to subsidise another one on a long term basis.

    The Need for Distancing

    What then should the appropriate answer be if you are already

    the number one? Of course, in war, you can seek to destroy your

    enemies. In business, however, you do not actively go about

    destroying the competitors. This would project the company as very

    ruthless and without moral principles. However, while you may not

    go about destroying your business competitors, it does not mean

    MICROBIT

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    6/14

    28 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    C O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R Y

    that they do not aspire to put you out-of-business. Without doubt,

    many companies would wish that there are fewer and weaker

    competitors around. In this way, they would not have to work so

    hard for their market shares and prots!

    Instead of destroying the competitors, a more appropriate stance

    would be for the leader to distance itself from the competitors5.

    By distancing itself from the rest of the eld, it would be harder

    and harder for the competitors to catch up. In fact, if the gap

    becomes too big, the competitors may even give up chasing! More

    importantly, the concept of distancing can be applied to a company

    even if it may not be in the number one position. For example, if a

    company is in the number two position, its goal would be to catch

    up and overtake the number one. However, it is equally important

    that it distances itself from the rest of the competitors. In this way, it isassured of the runner-up position while going for the champion!

    Interestingly, there are several reasons why it is so important to

    distance oneself from the rest. Let me illustrate with the game of

    basketball. When the score is 62 to 60, 74 to 72, 86 to 84, and so

    on (that is, the difference between the two teams is only two points

    apart), what would your answers be to the following questions:

    1. Which team do you think will be under greater stress?

    2. Which team is more willing to take risks?

    3. Which team will be afraid of making mistakes?

    4. Which team is likely to be more innovative and creative?

    Think of the answers carefully. Not surprisingly, many of you will

    say that the team that is behind by only two points is likely to be

    more willing to take risks and to innovate. Conversely, the team that

    is marginally ahead is more afraid to make mistakes, is less willing

    to take risks, and is under more stress and tension! The logic is very

    simple. The guy behind is too close for comfort! As a result, the

    team that is leading is forced to take a more conservative posture to

    defend its position.

    This is where the irony lies. To be a leader, there is a need to

    continue to innovate and be creative. This implies the necessity

    to take risks and the ability to tolerate and accommodate

    mistakes. Only then can the people in the organisation be willing to

    experiment, develop new ideas and concepts. All these can ourish

    much better if the organisation has enough capital and bufferto

    do so. This is where distancing becomes so crucial. It allows the

    leading company to have sufcient breathing space to develop new

    ideas and innovations, and accomplish them with minimal tension

    and stress. In other words, the greater the space, the greater is the

    freedom to carry out innovative and creative works without fear of

    making mistakes. This, in turn, will spur greater willingness to think

    and act outside the box. The whole process moves like a vicious

    cycle, each propelling and spiralling the development of the other.

    It is a very simple, yet powerful concept that only the enlightened

    companies are able to master it.

    On the other hand, when the gap over the competitors is very

    narrow, the leading company actually becomes vulnerable by

    default. This is because when the gap is very narrow, it becomes a

    most logical, achievable and acceptable target for the competitors

    to take it down. Not only that, when the margin is very narrow, it

    becomes a motivating factor to the competitors. This is because

    they will be red and charged up even more to take down the

    leader as winning is clearly within reach. Indeed, in business

    competition, the most regrettable situation is to provide motivationto the competitors.

    Table 1 provides a list of contrasting leadership behaviour that

    are likely to affect any company. Clearly, when a company is in

    a leadership position, it should always attempt to widen its gap

    over its competitors if it wants to become even more successful.

    In fact, when the gap is very wide, the competitors may be so

    demoralised that they are forced to be contented to remain as

    followers. Not surprisingly, those companies who know how to

    master the concept of distancing will never cease to expand its

    leadership position even further. The quest to become even bigger

    by corporate giants like Microsoft, Intel, Dell Computers and many

    others may also become easier to understand once readers can

    grasp the inherent power of distancing.

    How To Distance Oneself From The Competitors?

    Having understood the need for distancing, how does a company

    go about doing it? Of course, when such a company is not in the

    leadership position, it can always learn from those who are ahead

    of it. However, if the company is already in the leading position,

    where and who else can it learn from? Let me venture to say that

    it can learn from many sources. In fact, there is no limit to learning

    if one has the right attitude. This is captured by the following

    Chinese saying:

    Dang ni xiang xue xi de shi hou, lao shi zi ran hui chu xian

    When you (the student) is ready to learn, the teacher will

    appear naturally.

    Indeed, there are many ways in which a company can learn.

    The following are some examples.

    5 Distancing, as used here, refers more to the widening of the gap between the leader and its competitors in the market place. Within a company,

    the leader (for example, the managing director or chief executive ofcer) should never attempt to widen his gap over his potential successors and

    subordinates. Such a behaviour would be undesirable for teamwork and will affect overall corporate performance. Just like in war where a general

    cannot win a war without the backing of his troops, no corporate leader can win business wars without the strong support of his rank-and-le.

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    7/14

    29 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    Table 1: Contrasting Leadership Behaviour

    The result was that KFC had over the years introduced menu items

    that were popular with the Chinese population. These included

    Chinese-style vegetable soups, porridge and other dishes that cater

    to the local taste buds7.

    Interestingly, KFC was not alone in doing this. In Hong Kong,

    McDonald's introduced McRice meals8 in July 2002 that caused

    great unhappiness among the small restaurants and local food

    operators. In contrast to the western fast food chains, the local

    food operators in many Asian economies have been very slow to

    learn from them, especially in the realm of marketing, management

    and innovation. As a result, when McDonald's introduced McRice

    meals in July 2002, many small local Chinese restaurants and food

    operators cried foul. They could only complain when such things

    happened, but did little to improve their modes of operations over

    the years. Ironically, it is generally acknowledged that these local

    small Chinese restaurants and operators actually provide better

    quality and tastier food that suit the local palate. What they lack aremanagement and marketing skills and knowledge. Fortunately, the

    larger local food operators have begun to respond more decisively

    by learning from these western fast food chains. For example, air-

    conditioned local food courts have begun to appear and compete

    directly with these western fast food chains in major Asian cities of

    Singapore, Hong Kong and Taipei.

    In the case of China, local fast food operators have also begun

    to emerge since the late 1990s. The more notable ones include Da

    Niang Dumpling (da niang jiao zi ), Peking Duck (bei jing

    kao ya ), Ma Lan Noodles (ma lan la mian )

    Learn From Direct and Indirect Competitors

    For a company that is in a leadership position, the temptation is to

    look down on its competitors. This, precisely, is the kind of mistake

    that it should never make. Arrogance typically comes before a fall,

    as depicted by the following Chinese saying:

    Jiao bing bi bai

    A proud and arrogant army is bound to face defeat.

    Instead, a company should maintain a positive attitude towards

    learning:

    Ju shang er bu jiao

    When one is at the top, one should not be arrogant.

    This is because there are still useful lessons that can be learnedfrom direct competitors who may be smaller but more agile and

    adaptive. Take the case of Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) in China.

    Since opening its rst branch in Beijing in 1987, it had expanded

    tremendously over the years. It opened its 700th restaurant in

    Shenzhen in late September 2002, and was the largest foreign fast

    food chain in China. In fact, it led the other western fast food chains

    in China by a very comfortable margin6. One would be tempted to

    think that given its great success, it would have very little to learn

    from its competitors, especially from the small local Chinese food

    operators. However, KFC did not rest on its laurels. Instead, it

    sought to learn from the product offerings of smaller food operators.

    WHEN LEADERSHIP GAP IS NARROW WHEN LEADERSHIP GAP IS WIDE

    1. Forced to guard against competitors Competitors are wary of moves by leader

    2. Limited economies of scale Great economies of scale

    3. Cannot afford to take high risks Can afford to take high risks

    4. Can become conservative and less innovative More scope for innovation and creativity

    5. Under stress from competitors Stress is more self-induced

    6. Afraid to make mistakes Great leeway to accommodate mistakes

    7. Tend to use more tactics Time to plan and strategise

    8. Tend to be reactive and defensive Can be proactive and be on the offensive

    9. Forced to take more short term measures Able to take long term perspectives

    10. Can be harassed by the competitors Can demoralise the competitors

    11. Less market and lobbying power More market and lobbying power

    12. Difcult to dictate nor set the market trends Able to dictate and set the market trends

    6 McDonald's was ranked second as of September 2002, and had about 500 outlets in China.

    7 Clearly, such dishes were also in response to customers needs and wants.

    8 These were basically local-style rice dishes that came with some vegetables and meat.

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    8/14

    30 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    C O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R Y

    and King of Noodles (mian dian wang )9. While modest in

    their beginnings, these Chinese fast food operators are starting to

    pose some creditable challenges to the western fast food chains.

    However, they still have a long way to go, and much can still be

    learned from their western counterparts, especially in the realm of

    innovative marketing and effective management of product quality,

    production systems and procedures.

    Useful ideas can be gained from indirect competitors as

    well. Take the logistics industry as an example. Today, logistics

    companies compete against the traditional shipping and

    transportation companies on the one hand and the more modern

    courier companies on the other hand. Shipping and transportation

    companies are equipment heavy and excel in managing at the

    ports of call and movement of bulky and large volume items. Timeis important but not in terms of speed of movement. It is more in

    terms of consistency of scheduled arrivals and departures. Cost

    is also an area of high concern as the margins are thin. As such,

    utilisation and deployment of assets are keys to its success.

    Courier companies, on the other hand, excel in documentation,

    information technology and the movement of small, high value and

    low volume items. Time, in terms of speed of delivery, is critical as

    a competitive factor. Their businesses tend to focus more on higher

    margin deliveries on a door-to-door basis.

    Interestingly, the logistics business has grown tremendously

    over the last 10 years largely by learning from the courier, shipping

    and transportation companies. Its growth was largely by integrating

    the best of both approaches to solving the delivery problem.

    Not surprisingly, an increasing number of shipping and courier

    companies are now expanding into the logistics business as well.

    Here, I must point out that learning from direct and indirect

    competitors is not conned to learning about the good practices

    only. At times, valuable lessons can be gained by understanding

    the mistakes made by competitors too. In this way, one can avoid

    the same pitfalls. More importantly, learning from the mistakes

    and pitfalls of the competitors will enable a company to nd new

    ways and / or alternative ways and methods to compete. In fact,

    it will help the company to think outside the box. Let me illustrate

    with an example of the housing mortgage war that erupted among

    banks in Singapore in 2002. Many banks took the direct approach

    of competing merely on mortgage rates. This approach was very

    direct and allowed the consumer to make comparisons, and hence

    to shop for better rates from one bank to another. Not surprisingly,

    it created a downward spiralling effect, forcing the banks to reduce

    their rates even further. One bank even offered a rate as low as

    1.33% per annum on a monthly declining balance basis.

    Having learned from the competitors, two foreign banks,

    namely Standard Chartered Bank and Citibank, chose to compete

    differently by focusing on special deals to each individual customer.

    Citibank, for example, offered cash rebates and discounts, including

    interest-free renovation loans, high yield current accounts to

    offset the higher mortgage rates and other benets that effectively

    reduced the cost of borrowing. Standard Chartered Bank, on the

    other hand, offered interest rates on deposits that were similar to

    that of the mortgage rate charged to the customer10. By taking

    such approaches, these two banks avoided been drawn into direct

    comparison with the mortgage rates offered by other banks. It also

    enabled them to sell their packages differently as well as to provide

    strong differentation and customisation of their offers according to

    the needs of their customers. By varying their competitive tactics,

    these two banks managed to hold on to their market sharesextremely well.

    Learn From Other Industries and Businesses

    Learning from other industries and businesses is another way to

    get ideas to distance oneself from the competitors. This is because

    many practices used in one industry can be adapted or be applied

    to another industry as well. The hospital industry is a case in point.

    For many years now, the top-end hospitals have adopted many

    practices used in ve-star hotels. Today, a top-end hospital boasts

    of having valet parking, in-house movies, customised menus, ne

    dining outlets, high quality shops, personalised check-ins, payment

    by credit cards, etc. These facilities and services are similar to that

    provided by a ve-star hotel.

    Similarly, Acer Computer, a leading company from Asia, learned

    its inventory control practices through studying the system used

    by McDonald's. This may seem odd, considering the differences

    between Acer and McDonald's. What can a mature, ordinary,

    western fast food chain teach a fast growing, relatively high

    technology rm based in Asia? The truth was, it did, and this brings

    to mind another interesting Chinese saying:

    Zhi ji zhi duan, bu yan ren zhi chang

    Be conscious of your own shortcomings and never scorn the

    strengths of others.

    Indeed, different kinds of businesses will have their unique

    and perhaps strong modes of operations or business practices

    that can inspire others. One should never overlook them. With the

    great access to information (for example, through the Internet and

    web-based databases) and availability of technology, it has become

    easier to learn from others. Moreover, the boundaries of competition

    across products and industries have also become blurred as a

    9 The names are translated. Da Niang originated from Jiangsu Province, Peking Duck and Ma Lan originated from Beijing, while the King of Noodles

    started in Shenzhen.

    10 Supercially, this seemed to imply that the customer was paying zero interest rate on the mortgage. In reality, this was not the case as the size of the

    mortgage loan taken out by the average customer would always be many times larger than the amount of deposit that he/she had with the bank.

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    9/14

    31 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    result of technology and the multi-disciplinary nature of businesses

    today. Take the case of Dell Computers. Its computer is made up

    of parts and components supplied by everyone else. Its success is

    not dependent on research and development nor manufacturing.

    Yet, it is able to build up a world class company. Its components

    and parts are outsourced, but it has a sophisticated information

    management system that manages both the supply and demand

    side of its business, and it ensures speedy and timely delivery

    of its highly customised products to a mass market! Its model

    also has strong elements of direct marketing tactics and efcient

    management of nancial cash ow and payments. Clearly, the Dell

    model contains many useful lessons for other businesses.

    Another insightful example of how a company learned from other

    businesses is the case of 7-Eleven, an international conveniencestore chain, in Hong Kong. Realising that McDonalds managed to

    attract a good following of local customers with its McRice Meals

    that were priced at HK$22, 7-Eleven decided to enter this market

    with a more aggressive strategy. It launched seven different kinds of

    lunch box meals at a price of HK$15 to HK$16 each11 in

    October 2002. There were other reasons for 7-Eleven to get into

    the local eatery business, despite being a traditional grocery store.

    The economy of Hong Kong had remained weak as of 2002 and

    there were pressures to increase its revenue base. More importantly,

    7-Eleven stores were located conveniently all over Hong Kong in

    very high trafc areas. By packing the meals into lunch boxes, they

    became easy take-away items like any convenient product.

    To differentiate itself from other food operators, 7-Eleven claimed

    that its lunch box meals were healthier than others, and even

    placed the calorie count of each meal on its box label. Certainly,

    not only did 7-Eleven learn from other businesses, it also provided

    some useful lessons for others to learn from it too.

    Learn From Own Employees

    Employees, especially those in sales, customer service, and delivery

    are often in close contacts with customers and the market. As a

    result, they have over the course of their dealings, a rich pool of

    knowledge on how the products and/or services are received by

    11 In fact, the lunch box meals were launched at a promotional price of HK$10 each for a two-week period from 1stOctober 2002. It also sold the lunch

    box meals at hefty discounts of up to 50% after 3 pm each day. This hefty price discount is also a sales tactic that is commonly practiced by the

    bakery section of large supermarkets and hotels to remove its end-of-day items that have short shelf lives.

    REALTIMME

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    10/14

    32 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    the customers. In addition, they probably have intimate information

    on competitive products and services too. They form a valuable

    pool of resources awaiting to be tapped. When deployed effectively,

    they could also be used to nd out more information about the

    changing tastes and preferences of existing customers as well as to

    gather business intelligence on the competitors too. The challenge,

    however, is that the top management of the company must realise

    that such a great potential exists, and they must be humble enough

    to learn from and through their own subordinates, as reected by

    the following Chinese saying:

    Bu chi xia wen

    There is no shame in learning from people who are junior to us.

    In fact, one of the most effective ways that a company can

    benet from its employees is to use them as agents to collect

    market information on its products, services, competitors, and other

    market feedback directly from the customers. The sales people are

    one such potential pool of information gathering agents. Instead

    of hounding them day and night to meet sales quota, a company

    should also consider how it can use them to get closer to its

    customers. To motivate them to do so, the performance evaluation

    of the sales people can include an additional criterion such as

    What new or additional things have you learned from the clients

    during the last or past few visits. In addition, the sales people

    can be made to share such information openly at sales meetings.

    They can then be rewarded according to the type and value of

    information that can be implemented in ways that help increase the

    sales and service performances of the company.

    This seemingly naive and simple question about What new

    things/lessons have you learned from the clients, can yield

    surprising results. For example, when trying to learn more about

    the needs and requirements of the customers, the sales people

    will inevitably nd out more information about the strengths and

    weaknesses of their products and services as well as those of the

    competitors. They may even be able to obtain valuable feedback

    about market conditions and trends. More importantly, when the

    sales people are able to share information among themselves, they

    are also promoting learning and teamwork within the company.

    As a result of sharing and learning, motivation and morale of the

    sales team will also be further reinforced. The result is that sales

    may be increased while achieving a higher level of customer sales

    satisfaction. These are all positive outcomes for the image and

    reputation of the company.

    Learn From Consumers and Users

    Consumers and users of products and services provide anotherrich source to obtain ideas on how to improve and distance

    oneself from the competitors. After all, a company exists to cater

    to the needs of consumers, and as such it should always attempt

    to address their needs, tastes and preferences. While not every

    consumer will provide the best idea, sampling a cross section of

    them through skilfully conducted market research can reveal very

    useful information. This willingness to learn from everyone, including

    the consumers, is like the following Chinese saying:

    San ren xing bi you wo shi

    When I walk in the company of three people, there is surely a

    teacher among them.

    Any marketing-oriented company will know that its customers

    form the key to its success and provide the lifeline to its business.

    Today, an increasing number of companies are trying to nd out

    more about their customers through data-mining, surveys, focus

    group interviews, and other means. Their aim is to nd ways toserve their customers better as well as to nd ways to differentiate

    their product / service offerings from their competitors.

    Let me cite two examples on how leading companies learn from

    their users and customers. The rst one is Singapore Airlines (SIA).

    In mid-2002, SIA did something very unusual. It conducted a series

    of meal tasting tests among very young children who ew on its

    airlines. The purpose was to nd the meals that are most suitable

    and palatable to young children. This was because SIA discovered

    that its frequent yers include young children and the number

    has been increasing over the years. As a leading airline, it was

    determined to nd ways to distance itself from the offerings of its

    competitors. Catering to the taste buds of young children becomes

    another competitive means to achieve this objective.

    The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) is another

    world class organisation that has won countless awards for its

    management of the Changi International Airport. Like SIA, it has

    been consistently rated as the best in its class by numerous

    international bodies. However, CAAS is not contented to rest on

    its laurels. As of 2002, it had developed mass rapid transit (MRT)

    connection right to its terminals.

    More importantly, as of 2002, CAAS had already nalised plans

    to build a third terminal despite the fact that its current two terminals

    were more than adequate to handle the volume of trafc for many

    more years. The building of a third terminal is part of its quest

    to provide even better services and to distance itself from other

    international airports. Many of the new features to be incorporated

    in the third terminal have been the result of feedback by users of the

    airport. At the same time, improvements to the existing two terminals

    are made regularly. The challenge of being in the leadership position

    can be very onerous. While SIA and CAAS may be highly respected

    by their competitors, the users/customers and the market, they donot rest on their laurels. They know that such accolades do not mean

    that they are immune from making mistakes. They can still risk being

    dislodged by their competitors. As such, they have consistently

    attempted to learn from others, including from their users. In fact,

    C O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R Y

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    11/14

    33 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    they are known to conduct surveys and interviews with their users

    frequently. They do so because they are not contented with just being

    the number one, nor are they satised with merely protecting and

    maintaining their existing status. Rather, they are always striving to

    distance themselves from the rest of the eld.

    Learn From Channel and Distribution Members

    By now, readers will know that no leader or leading company is

    immune from making mistakes. To avoid making mistakes and

    to improve continuously, one has to learn from as many sources

    as possible. This includes learning from distribution and channel

    members.

    The following Chinese saying puts it well:

    Zhi zhe qian l, bi you yi shi

    Even the wise are not always free from error.

    For companies who rely on various kinds of distribution

    channels to reach out to the consumers, the channel members are

    another important source to solicit and obtain valuable ideas and

    inputs. The value of channel member can be easily illustrated in the

    retail business. Very often, a good salesman can change the brand

    of the product that a customer wants to buy at the point of sale

    despite the fact that he may be carrying that brand. This is because

    he understands the needs and wants of the customer, and is able

    to inuence the purchase decision. What this means is that he is in

    a much stronger position than the manufacturer in inuencing the

    decision of the consumer.

    Not surprisingly, the more enlightened companies have

    developed very strong relationships with their dealers and agents.

    They realise that dealers and agents not only can help them to

    market their products and brands, but can push them harder over

    competitive products and brands too. A good example is the story

    of how the Japanese luxury car, Lexus, managed to penetrate

    successfully into the U.S market in the 1980s against the very

    established continental brands like Mercedes, BMW and Jaguar.

    Among other reasons for its success, the role played by the dealers

    was often cited as a major factor.

    There is an interesting trend that has emerged in the more

    developed economies of Asia, and this concerns the marketing

    of house brands. Despite its successes in the west among

    supermarket and departmental store businesses12, house brands

    had never taken off in economies like Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan

    and Singapore. However, house brands showed possible signs

    of acceptance in recent years for several reasons. Firstly, theeconomic downturn and recession played a big part in the

    rationalisation of purchases by Asian consumers. Instead of paying

    a high price premium for branded products, they are more willing

    to scale back their expenses on items where product quality has

    become very high and standardised. Secondly, more established

    retailers such as Marks & Spencer, well-known for its own house

    brands, entered the Asian market. Some local retailers had also

    grown bigger with strong market presence. As a result, house

    brands are no longer perceived as low quality products. Thirdly, and

    which I think is a very important factor, is that these retailers have

    taken a different route in the creation and development of their own

    house brands, something that the original brand manufacturers

    should take notice of and learn from them accordingly. Let me

    explain with the case of Singapore.

    House brands used to be rejected by the average Singaporean

    consumer 10 years ago. However, it is no longer the case. This isevidenced by the fact that NTUC FairPrice, the largest supermarket

    chain in Singapore, doubled the number of its products that carry

    its house brands from 200 in 1997 to 400 in 2002. Guardian, a

    pharmacy chain store, increased its house brand products by ve

    times within a two year period to 250 as of 2002. Cold Storage,

    another supermarket chain also had several hundred house brand

    products. Other than the reasons mentioned earlier, the strategies

    taken by these retailers are useful lessons for the manufacturers of

    the traditional branded products.

    To begin with, these retailers which are now big players, take an

    active interest not only in sourcing their products, but in determining

    their quality as well. Some of them are known to work closely with

    their suppliers/manufacturers who lack the resources to develop

    their own brands. In addition, more attention are now paid to the

    packaging of the products. They now come in equally attractive

    and high quality packaging just like traditional branded products.

    More interestingly, some of these retailers even develop their own

    brands that do not carry the name of the store. For example, Cold

    Storage used a brand name First Choice for some of its house

    brands. It even developed a very popular brand, French Cellers, for

    its wine collection. Some products by Guardian are marketed under

    the brand of Angel. These retailers also promote their house brand

    products very aggressively through media advertising.

    As a result of such efforts, the quality and image of house

    brands have improved substantially over the past few years. With

    more discerning consumers who are able to appreciate that quality

    need not come at higher prices and who have high condence in

    reputation of these established retailers, these relatively cheaper

    house brands have been making increasing penetration into the

    traditional brands. These are precious lessons that manufacturers of

    branded goods cannot afford to ignore.

    Learn From Consultants and Trainers

    Readers may be interested to know that in ancient China, the

    12 A good example is that of Marks & Spencer which has a very well developed in-house line of products that are marketed under its own

    stores worldwide.

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    12/14

    34 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    employment of foreign talents (ke qing ) was commonly

    practiced. These foreign talents were actually non-native ofcials

    who were employed in various advisory roles and positions, such as

    military consultants, advisors, and trainers. Sun Zi mentioned such

    appointments in his Chapter 2 on Waging War(zuo zhan ).

    In the same way, a company must be willing to learn from

    external and independentparties like business consultants and

    trainers. Unlike customers, dealers and agents who typically

    have vested interests in what they suggest, consultants and

    trainers do not carry such baggage. They do not have to please

    the company, especially if their services are well demanded by

    other businesses. As such, their views may be more candid,

    provocative and unbiased.

    Even if consultants and trainers do have some vested interests,

    it is still worthwhile listening to them, as reected by the following

    Chinese saying:

    Jian ting ze ming, pian xin ze an

    Listen to many points of views and you will be enlightened. Biased

    beliefs based on a one-sided view will lead to disaster.

    When a good consultant is engaged, his views can be very

    valuable. This is because his exposure to many companies and

    industries can bring valuable insights that unlock the blind spots

    of any company. Earlier, it was mentioned that a leading company

    should learn from indirect competitors and other businesses and

    industries. This is where a good consultant can provide that useful

    bridge to shorten the learning curve and to provide different

    ideas and approaches. It is a contribution, if tapped, can be of

    immense value.

    Learn From The Past

    In this modern world of high technology, internet, biosciences and

    genetic engineering, it is very tempting to dismiss any lessons that

    one can learn from the past. Yet, the following Chinese saying is

    worth noting:

    Qian shi bu wang, hou shi zhi shi

    If one does not forget the events of the past, they can become

    valuable lessons for future situations.

    Indeed, interesting ideas can be culled from the past. Old

    concepts can be resurrected and re-packaged differently to bring

    back the touch of nostalgia, and even to provide the needed edge

    to distance onself from the competitors. The fashion and movie

    industries are good examples. Typically, colours, patterns, cuts and

    designs go through cycles in the fashion industry. What is hype

    today will be cast in the shadow. Yet, what is considered as long

    gone may make surprising comebacks as new fashion. Similarly,

    with new sound and colour technology, many old movies have been

    given new leases of life.

    Interestingly, many of the best museums in the world thrive on

    exhibiting things and artifacts of the past. One such museum that

    opened to enthusiastic response in Washington, D.C., in mid-2002

    was on gadgets, instruments, and equipment used for espionage

    purposes. The artifacts on exhibition were those that were used

    in the past. Another fascinating museum opened to even greater

    response in Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia around the same

    period. It was a ghost museum! Most of the exhibits were basedon traditional Malay folklores, mysteries and myths about ghosts.

    They were ideas of the past that entice countless curious audience

    of this modern world!

    Perhaps, one of the most well-known examples about

    learning from the past has been the successes enjoyed by car

    manufacturers who brought back the Beetle (Volkswagen) and the

    Mini Cooper (Austin). Realising that there is a sizeable segment

    of the motoring public who hold nostalgic memories of these two

    cute cars, they were both rejuvenated and given a new lease of life.

    Beetle enjoyed great success since its launch a few years ago.

    Mini Cooper was launched in 2001 and enjoyed great acceptance

    by the market too.

    In Singapore, some innovative food operators have also

    revived seemingly old businesses by learning from the past.

    Realising the attractiveness and nostalgic ambience of the old

    coffee shop, commonly known as kopitiam (ka fei dian )

    by Singaporeans, these operators literally set up eateries called

    Kopitiam. In addition, they also brought back food items that were

    popular in the past. These include the half-boiled eggs, the kaya13

    toast and others. By learning from the past, these new generation

    food operators have managed to attract many local patrons.

    Interestingly, among them include many young professionals who

    yearn for a taste and experience of the past. Many too, have

    become converts and regular patrons of Kopitiam!

    With the increasing economic importance of China and

    its growing afuent class of consumers, many enterprising

    businessmen had also brought back nostalgic products and

    services of the past to great success. Some examples include the

    Chinese cheongsum14, the Mao suit15, nightclubs that play the

    songs of old Shanghai hotel lounges that offer classical Chinese

    music, etc. All these products and services of the past have been

    C O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R Y

    13 Kaya is a local jam-like bread spread made from eggs and other ingredients.

    14 This is a traditional evening gown for ladies.

    15 This is a traditional Chinese suit that was popularised by Mao Ze Tong, the late communist leader of China.

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    13/14

    35 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    very well received. Their successes are likely to inspire more of such

    offers in the future.

    Learn From Printed Media and Publications,

    Including Web-based Sources

    The Chinese has a very interesting saying about learning

    through reading:

    Kai juan you yi

    Reading will always bring about benets.

    With advances in information technolgy, the search for

    information is becoming easier and easier. One only needs to enter

    Yahoo and Google websites to experience the power of their searchengines. They literally lead us to the limitless world of knowledge

    and information at the touch of the keyboard. Almost all printed

    media can also be sourced electronically. Additional access to

    specic information can be obtained through e-mails and websites

    that have all kinds of hyper-links to other sites. Most importantly,

    almost all of these information can be obtained for free or at very

    low cost. One only needs to have the basic skills to surf and search

    the Internet for information.

    Given the great potential that electronic data search can

    provide, companies should seriously consider devoting dedicated

    resources for such purposes. As mentioned, a lot of information,

    ideas, etc. can be obtained at very low cost and with not much

    effort in such a manner. This effectively justies the case for

    employing dedicated personnel to perform such functions. Not

    surprisingly, the more enlightened companies have appropriately

    employed information technology ofcers who are also procient

    in conducting research on the Internet. If budget permits, it is

    timely for a company to consider appointing intelligence and/or

    information executives whose tasks are mainly to search, compile

    and analyse information that are relevant for usage by the company.

    Participate in Exhibitions, Trade Shows, Conferences,

    Overseas Visits, etc.

    As mentioned, there is no limit as to where one can learn.

    Participation in exhibitions, trade shows, going on overseas trips

    etc. are also means in which one can gather new ideas and

    concepts. The furniture, jewelry, clothing, toys and household

    appliances industries are good examples. Typically, new designs

    and concepts can be gained from taking part in trade fairs and

    shows. It is at such meetings that ideas, concepts and designs

    are exchanged, borrowed and adapted for different usages and

    purposes. The following Chinese saying captures the spirit of this

    kind of learning aptly:

    Cong jian zhe bo, duo wen zhe zhi

    Those who see more will broaden their perspective. Those who

    listen more will know and learn more.

    Obviously, by travelling more, one will have greater chances

    to see more and listen more. In particular, learning will come from

    interacting with people from different backgrounds and culture.

    To survive and compete in this increasingly intertwined world of

    business, there is an increasing need for a company to be exposed

    to what is going on in the rest of the world. This is to allow it to

    explore trade and business opportunities beyond its own national

    borders, and to understand the needs and wants of its international

    customers. This can only come about when a company is prepared

    to go abroad rst to learn before venturing to market or sell its

    products in overseas markets. Unfortunately, many companies

    forget about the need to learn rst. They hastily export theirproducts, and some even go into direct investment without doing

    their homework to understand the local operating environment, their

    partners, the customers, the local government, etc. As a result, they

    end up licking their wounds. One only needs to think of the many

    business failures in China in recent years to understand this point.

    Think and Act Outside the Box

    If a company is the industry leader, it must be prepared to lead.

    If not, some other companies will take over the leadership soon.

    More importantly, it must focus on distancing itself from the rest of

    the eld. To achieve this, it must be prepared to think and to act

    outside the box. This means learning from all kinds of sources and

    breaking conventions if necessary. Take the case of McDonald's,

    the leader in the western fast food industry. It has a company that is

    tasked with supplying it with all kinds of promotional and marketing

    ideas. This has resulted in many promotional gimmicks that did not

    even form part of its core business. For example, it has over the

    years, came up with the marketing of many collectible toys such

    as Hello Kitty, Doberman Dog series, etc. that captured the hearts

    of its customers. Many consumers were even prepared to join long

    queues to buy the burgers so as to be eligible to buy the toys.

    Even with its core business of fast food, McDonald's has shown

    its willingness to break conventions by adjusting to the needs of the

    consumer and the changing market conditions. In Singapore, for

    example, it provides chilli for its hamburgers, something unheard of

    in the U.S market. In Hong Kong, faced with slowing growth and

    the severe economic recession in 2002, it offered McRice meals,

    complete with a mould of rice, chicken and a few pieces of brocolli

    at HK$22 (about US$2.80). The offer was very well received by its

    customers and caused severe threats to the local food operators.

    This was because as of mid-2002, McDonald's had 135 outlets

    in various locations of Hong Kong. Its ability to provide consistent

    high quality meals at every restaurant was something that few localChinese fast food outlets and chains could match. KFC did likewise

    in China with its Chinese-style dishes.

  • 8/7/2019 Art%20of%20War

    14/14

    36 S I N G A P O R E A C C O U N T A N T J U L Y / A U G U S T 2 0 0 4

    C O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R YC O V E R S T O R Y

    What is perhaps interesting to point out is that McDonald's was

    already in Hong Kong since 1975. Given that rice menu ts perfectly

    into the eating habits of Hong Kongers who are largely Chinese, it

    took McDonald's, an industry leader, more than 27 years to decide

    on launching such a meal. Perhaps, it was the steep recession of

    2001/02 and the need to arrest declining prots and market share

    that prompted McDonald's to depart from its norm of selling mainly

    hamburgers. Regardless of the reasons, it is signicant to point out

    that it took McDonald's so long to think and act out of the box.

    The following Chinese saying captures the essence of the belated

    response of McDonald's very well:

    Zhi zhi nan, bu zai yu jian ren, shi zai yu zi jian

    The challenge in knowing is not in assessing others, but in takingstock of oneself.

    Let me illustrate with another example. Some years ago, I had

    the privilege of conducting a seminar cum workshop for the Civil

    Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS). Its Director-General then

    was very concerned that CAAS must nd new ways to distance

    itself from its competitors. In other words, CAAS was prepared to

    think and act outside the box, it had the right learning attitude.

    As the leading airport in the world, it was difcult for CAAS to

    learn from other airports16. It was interested to learn from any other

    means and avenues, and to get ideas and concepts to improve its

    operations. Among other things that were discussed at the seminar

    cum workshop, I proposed that CAAS should learn from world

    class resorts and entertainment centres like Las Vegas, Disney

    World and Hollywood. To me, managing the leading airport in the

    world extends beyond that of efciency alone. It should include

    managing the experience of every passenger who uses it so that

    he/she will be completely delighted. Take the case of Las Vegas.

    It was built in a desert area. Yet, its hotels, entertainment facilities,

    restaurants, shopping centres, etc. are simply fantastic and magical

    to the extent that visitors do not get tired spending time there and

    going back again. The same can be said about Disney World.

    There are many precious lessons that can be learned by studying

    the magic behind the success of such mega attractions. In fact,

    some of their features could easily be incorporated in the design of

    any airport terminal17.

    Conclusion: Willingness to Learn

    For a company that is in a leadership position, the willingness to

    learn is extremely important to ensure that it remains at the forefront

    of the eld. This is because being the leader, the general temptation

    is to think that it cannot learn from its competitors anymore. It may

    even be lured into a state of complacency. Thus, it is crucial that

    it adopts the right attitude to learn from all sources, including from

    those considered as inferior to it. As mentioned earlier, when it has

    the right attitude towards learning, there is no limit in acquiring ideas

    and knowledge, as reected by the following Chinese saying:

    Dang ni (xue sheng) xiang xue xi de shi hou, lao shi zi ran hui

    chu xian

    When you (the student) are ready to learn, the teacher will appear.

    It cannot afford to relax and take things easy. In fact, it must

    consistently and consciously strive to improve itself:

    You ze gai zhi, wu ze jia mian

    Change when there are mistakes; strengthen when there are none.

    Indeed, business competition is like running a marathon

    except that it has no nishing line. At the same time and at any

    one point, new and fresh runners can join the eld. To survive

    the competition, it must learn to widen its lead and distance itself

    from the rest. In this way, it can continue to be innovative and

    creative and to perform the functions of what a leader should be

    doing. After all, according to Sun Zi, it is always better when the

    enemy has to prepare himself against you than the other way

    round. Such an enviable position can only be available to those

    enlightened few who know not only to stay ahead of the eld, but

    to distance himself with such a comfortable gap that the others

    will not only simply give up on trying to catch up, but would openly

    acknowledge the leader as the supreme emperor or supreme

    commander as mentioned at the beginning of this paper.

    Wee Chow Hou (C H Wee) is a professor of Strategy, Management

    & Organisation and Chairman of the Nanyang Executive

    Programmes at the Nanyang Business School, Nanyang

    Technological University (NTU) and a Honorary Professor of the

    Faculty of Management at Xiamen University (China) and the

    Universiti Tunku Addul Rahman (UTAR) of Malaysia. Prior to joining

    NTU, he was Professor of Business Policy (since 1995), Dean of

    the Faculty of Business Administration and Director of the Graduate

    School of Business from February 1990 to January 1999 at the

    National University of Singapore (NUS).

    This article was rst published in Nanyang Business Review by the

    Nanyang Business School of Nanyang Technological University (NTU).

    Reproduced with permission.

    16 In fact, CAAS does this very often by sending its top ofcials to study and learn from other airports around the world.

    17 For the regular visitors to CAAS, I leave it to their judgement and observation as to whether it has incorporated some of the ideas/concepts in the

    airport terminals. Whats my Range, a fun game with free shopping vouchers and prizes, for example, was introduced very successfully at the

    airport in 2001/02.


Recommended