ARTEMIS/ENIACARTEMIS/ENIAC-- JU operations JU operations and Calls for proposals 2008 and Calls for proposals 2008

Isabel Vergara“Nanoelectronics”

European Commission, Brussels

••• 2

Outline of presentation

• ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint Undertakings• Organisation• Calls 2008 • Rules for participation

••• 3

European Technology Platforms: EC policy motivation

• Develop and drive forward coherent R&D strategies– In strategic areas

• Ramp up R&D investment in Europe– Towards 3% (Barcelona Objective)

• Bring together fragmented efforts– Building European Research Area

European Technology Platforms introduced in the Commission Communication on an Action Plan for 3%

of GDP for research (2003)

http://cordis.europa.eu/technology-platforms/home_en.html

ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/technology-platforms/docs/etp3rdreport_en.pdf

Third STATUS REPORT

••• 4

••• 5

Joint Technology Initiatives (JTI)

• Arising from Technology Platforms• Formalized public-private partnerships

– Covering a focused set of R&D challenges– Combining private and public (European and national) financial resources– Legal basis: Article 171 of the Treaty

• Criteria– Very limited number of cases with huge challenges– Inability of existing instruments to achieve objectives– Impact on industrial competitiveness– Strength of commitment from industry– Capacity to attract additional national support and leverage industrial

funding

Article 171“The Community may set up joint undertakings or any other structure necessary for the efficientexecution of Community research, technological development and demonstration programmes.”

••• 6

• Industrially-driven applied research programme incl. application areas

• Large initiatives to increase critical mass

• High level of SME participation

• Long term strategic partnerships

• Budget certainty, fast cycle time, decentralisation

• Common approach, common processes and co-funding by MS and Commission towards common goals

• Increased R&D funding

Boosting the competitiveness of EU industry whilst building the European Research Area

Characteristics of ARTEMIS and ENIAC JTIs

••• 7

Outline of presentation

• ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint Undertakings• Organisation• Calls 2008• Rules for participation

••• 8

• Bodies set up by the Community• Duration: till 31-12-2017• Seat: Brussels• Members: Industry, European Community, a set of Member

States and Associated Countries• Objectives

– Define and implement a Research Agenda– Support R&D activities (Calls for Proposals)– Promote the public-private partnership (increase investments)– Achieve synergy and coordination with other European R&D– Promote the involvement of SME’s

Joint Undertakings:Implementation of ARTEMIS & ENIAC JTIs

••• 9

ENIAC/ARTEMIS JTI - timeline

• ARTEMIS / ENIAC JTI Proposal adopted on 15 May 2007 by the Commission• Regulation for establishing the ARTEMIS / ENIAC Joint Undertaking

• Presented to the Competitiveness Council on 22 May 2007• European Parliament

• Discussion in ITRE Committee (Sept - Nov)• Vote at EP Plenary (December)

• European Economic Social Committee• Decision by Council on 20 December 2007• Formal establishment: 7 February 2008

• Interim period

ü First Call for proposals launched in May 2008

••• 10

ARTEMIS/ENIAC JU: Who is involved ?

EC

Member States

&

Associated

Countries

General Assembly

Steering Board

Governing BoardStrategy and rules of operation, supervision

(Votes: 50% industrial ass. & 50% PA’s)

Industry and Research Committee

Strategic planning

Public Authorities Board

Calls and project selection(Voting rights proportional

to € commitments)Working Groups

Executive DirectorOperations and finances

ResearchIndustry(incl. SME)

••• 11

Joint Undertaking:General principle of project financing

– Industrial:• at least 50% in-kind

– Participating States:• national contracts • possibility of cross-border funding

& subcontracting to other JU member participants

– Joint Undertaking:• In addition to

national payments

Total Costs > 6

2

> 3

1

••• 12

ARTEMIS Member States

• Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom

20 Member States

••• 13

ENIAC Member States

• Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom

17 Member States

••• 14

Budget of Joint Undertakings2008-2013

• Operating costs– ARTEMISIA/AENEAS: not exceeding 30m or 1% of R&D costs– Commission: not exceeding 10m– Member States and associated countries: in-kind

• Total R&D budget of the initiatives (total R&D costs in projects: – Community (FP7): ARTEMIS up to 410 million €– Community (FP7): ENIAC up to 440 million €– States: > 1.8x Community contribution– R&D actors: in-kind >50% of costs (50% in FP - ~65% in EUREKA)

ARTEMIS ~2.5 billion €, ENIAC ~3.0 billion €

••• 15

Joint Undertaking funding flow

EC

MASMember &

Associated

States

Project

€ cash forrunning costs

€ cash forrunning costs and R&D

Research

Industry

In-kind for R&D work

€ for R&D€ for R&D

••• 16

JU Operations 2008

• Both JUs are established since 7 February 2008• Commission is responsible for the establishment of the

ARTEMIS/ENIAC JU in collaboration with other founding members until the JU has operational capacity to implement its own budget

• Negotiations with Belgium authorities on the premises of the ARTEMIS/ENIAC JU (and 3 other JUs)

• ARTEMIS Interim Executive Director appointed is Kostas Glinos, European Commission

• ENIAC Interim Executive Director appointed is Dirk Beernaert, European Commission

• Executive Director jobs published in May 2008

••• 17

Outline of presentation

• ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint Undertakings• Organisation • Calls 2008• Rules for participation

••• 18

‘MoreMoore’

‘More than Moore’

Design Automation

Equipment and Materials, Manufacturing H

eter

ogen

eous

Inte

grat

ion

Beyo

ndC

MO

S

FP7(ICT-NMP)

WP 2007-2008WP 2009-2010

National /

regional

programmes

Joint Technology Initiative

Multi-Annual Strategic Plan

Annual Work Programme

Eureka (Catrene)

White BookCall1

PRIVATE

Coordination

ENIAC Industry-driven long-term vision

5+ €bn

ENIAC SRA implementation

••• 19

ENIAC JU Multi-Annual Strategic Plan

More Moore

More than Moore

Heterogeneous Integration

Design Methods & Tools

Equipment & Materials

Beyond CMOS

3. Security &

Safety

1. Health &

Wellness

4. Energy &

Environm

ent

2. Transport & M

obility

6. Infotainment

5. Com

munication

7. Design Methods & Tools

8. Equipment & Materials

Industry priorities for 2013 and beyond

MASP Sub-Programmes

••• 20

ENIAC JU Multi-Annual Strategic Plan

Security & safetyHealth & wellness Transport & mobility

InfotainmentCommunicationEnergy & environment

Technology focus varies by application

••• 21

ENIAC - Implementation of the Annual Work Programme

• The Annual Work Programme is a subset of the Multi-Annual Strategic Plan

• Selection of topics is based on the following criteria– Industry urgency– Synergy with related JTIs (ARTEMIS) and ETPs/clusters (EPoSS,

Photonics21, CATRENE)– Alignment with Public support

• Targeting vertically integrated projects in selected Sub-Programmes leading to representative demonstrators

• The Annual Work Programme defines the technical content of the JU Calls

••• 22

Focus areas for the ENIAC 2008 and 2009 Calls

SP2. Nanoelectronics for Transport and MobilitySP3. Nanoelectronics for Security and Safety SP4. Nanoelectronics for Energy and Environment SP7. Design Methods and Tools for NanoelectronicsSP8. Equipment and Materials for Nanoelectronics

SP1. Nanoelectronics for Health and WellnessSP5. Nanoelectronics for CommunicationSP6. Nanoelectronics for Infotainment SP7. Design Methods and Tools for NanoelectronicsSP8. Equipment and Materials for Nanoelectronics

2008

2009

••• 23

Priorities for the WP 2008 – Call 1 (1)

• SP2. Nanoelectronics for Transport & Mobility (500 p/y – 25%)- Components and smart systems for assisted driving- Components and smart systems for advanced

engine/exhaust/combustion control- Power/HV electronics and smart systems for hybrid and electrical cars- Fail safe and fault tolerant electronic systems

• SP3. Nanoelectronics for Security & Safety (200 p/y – 10%)- Trusted devices and smart secure portable systems- All-in-one imaging sensors

• SP4. Nanoelectronics for Energy & Environment (400 p/y – 20%)- Intelligent drive control- Efficient power supplies and power management solutions

••• 24

Priorities for the WP 2008 – Call 1 (2)

• SP7. Design Methods & Tools for Nanoelectronics (300 p/y – 15%)- Device, circuit, and system variability and reliability- HW/SW model driven high-level synthesis/flow/reuse/design

• SP8. Equipment & Materials for Nanoelectronics (600 p/y – 30%)- Advanced line operation for European device makers- Lithography process for beyond 32nm manufacturing- Assembling technology for system-in-package

••• 25

ARTEMIS SRA implementation

The ARTEMIS-JU focuses on the DOWNSTREAM sub-set of the ARTEMIS-SRA

The ARTEMIS-JU focuses on the DOWNSTREAM sub-set of the ARTEMIS-SRA

FP7

Upstream

ICT collab. R&D

ERC

Marie Curie

Research infrastr.

FP7

Upstream

ICT collab. R&D

ERC

Marie Curie

Research infrastr.

JTI/JU

Downstream

Unified processes

National contracts

EC co-funding

Innovation Env.

JTI/JU

Downstream

Unified processes

National contracts

EC co-funding

Innovation Env.

ARTEMIS-ETPIndustry-driven vision

Common pan-European SRACoordination and policy alignment in ERA

National / Regional

Programmes

National / Regional

Programmes

EUREKA

Downstream

ITEA 2 (embedded

part),

MEDEA+ (application part)

National contracts

EUREKA

Downstream

ITEA 2 (embedded

part),

MEDEA+ (application part)

National contracts

RA RMWP

The ARTEMIS-ETP SRA is referred to by many Research structures

••• 26

ARTEMIS JU Research: First principles

• The JU MASP and Research Agenda encapsulates the expectations of the JU stake-holders:

– “Think BIG”• = projects with appropriate critical mass to ensure significant impact of

result

– “Socio-Economic Benefits”• = “... to strengthen European competitiveness and allow the emergence of

new markets and societal applications.”– i.e. a focus on key technical problems, solving high-visibility issues with

commercially valorisable results

– “Multi-national”• = considers national/regional strategic priorities

– “Think Different”• = significant and complementary added-value over existing programmes

••• 27

ARTEMIS- ETP Strategic Research Agenda

ARTEMIS envisages cross-application solutions

Foun

datio

nal s

cien

ce &

te

chno

logy

Foun

datio

nal s

cien

ce &

te

chno

logy

Res

earc

h D

omai

ns

Application Contexts

IndustrialIndustrial Nomadic Environ-ments

Nomadic Environ-ments

Private SpacesPrivate Spaces

Public Infra-

structure

Public Infra-

structure

Reference Designs & ArchitecturesReference Designs & Architectures

Seamless Connectivity & MiddlewareSeamless Connectivity & Middleware

System Design Methods & ToolsSystem Design Methods & Tools

Common objectives:

Design Efficiency

Ease of Use

High added value

Time to market

Modularity

Safety / Security

Robustness

Competitiveness

Innovation

Cost reduction

Interoperability

Common objectives:

Design Efficiency

Ease of Use

High added value

Time to market

Modularity

Safety / Security

Robustness

Competitiveness

Innovation

Cost reduction

Interoperability

••• 28

ARTEMIS JU Sub-Programmes (1)

• SP1: Methods and Processes for Safety-relevant Embedded Systems– Embedded Systems for enhanced safety and efficiency

• Special relevance for the Transport & Manufacturing sectors

• SP2: Person-centric Health Management– Improved prevention, care, cure and well-being through Embedded

Systems• SP3: Smart Environments and Scalable Digital Services

– New (service / software) architectures for enhanced user experienceof (mobile) media and applications

– Enable the creation of new services that bring the “Ambient Intelligence” experience to the user

• SP4: Efficient Manufacturing and Logistics– Embedded Systems supporting sustainable, competitive, flexible

manufacturing, delivery and support of products over their complete life-cycle

••• 29

ARTEMIS JU Sub-Programmes (2)

• SP5: Computing Environments for Embedded Systems– New architectures and design paradigms for embedded systems– Transversal technology, with positive impact on all ES application domains

• SP6: Security, Privacy and Dependability(in Embedded Systems for Appliances/Networks/Services)– Protect the individual, the supplier and the (data) infrastructure from abuse– Protect the public at large (infrastructure protection)– Transversal technology, with positive impact on all ES application domains

• SP7: Embedded Technology for Sustainable Urban Life– Sustainable delivery of energy and other utilities– Improved energy use through cost-effective and

intelligent embedded systems (smart buildings).

• SP8: Human-centric Design of Embedded Systems– New ways to interact with technology– Easier-to-use, friendly electronics for home, work and play– Improved operator monitoring and control of transport and industrial systems

••• 30

ARTEMIS JU Research Budget 2008

• Member States (estimated): 64 M€• JU contribution: 35 M€ (55% of 63 M€)• Total funding: 99 M€

• R&D actors: minimum 99 M€ (in kind)

DRAFT

The Financial Contribution of the ARTEMIS JU will be16.7 % of eligible costs

••• 31

ENIAC JU Research Budget 2008

• Member States (estimated): 58 M€• JU contribution: 32 M€ (55% of 60 M€)• Total funding: 90 M€

• R&D actors: minimum 90 M€ (in kind)

DRAFT

The Financial Contribution of the ENIAC JU will be16.7 % of eligible costs

••• 32

Outline of presentation

• ARTEMIS and ENIAC Joint Undertakings• Organisation • Calls 2008• Rules for participation

••• 33

Eligibility Criteria (Proposals)

• It is submitted using the ENIAC/ARTEMIS Proposal Service (EPS/APS)

• It is received by the ENIAC/ARTEMIS JU before the deadline givenin the call text.

• It is complete and the following elements are present in the proposal as requested in the Guide for Applicants:– the administrative forms– the proposal description with all the mandatory sections

• It is submitted in English.• The content of the proposal relates to the topic(s) described in the

Annual Work Programme of the Call.

It must involve at least 3 non-affiliated legal entities established in at least 3 ENIAC/ARTEMIS member States

Only proposals that satisfy the above eligibility criteria are receivable and will be

evaluated by the ENIAC/ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking.

••• 34

Who can participate and get JU funding

• Legal entities from ENIAC/ARTEMIS Member States

• Legal entities from Member States and Associated Countries to FP7 (Switzerland, Israel, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Turkey, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia, Albania and Montenegro)

••• 35

Evaluation

• 4 independent evaluators • Consolidated evaluation report• Selection done by Public Authorities Board (PAB)• Evaluation criteria

– Relevance and contributions to the content and objectives of the Call

– R&D innovation and technical excellence– S&T approach and work plan– Market innovation and impact– Quality of consortium and management

••• 36

JTIs vs. Framework Programme: What’s different?

• Scope• Upstream vs. downstream• Funding rates• Industry – academia balance in consortia

• Public-private partnership approach• One vs. many in governance and decision making• One money pot vs. co-funding

••• 37

For more information:

• ARTEMIS JU:– http://www.artemis.eu

• ENIAC JU:– http://www.eniac.eu