1

6s2 Lone Pair Effects in related structures PbO, BiOF and Bi2NbO5F:

Crystal chemistry and DFT investigations.

Samir F. Matar1* and Jean Galy

2.

1 CNRS-ICMCB, Université de Bordeaux, F-33600 Pessac, France.

2 CNRS-LCTS, Université de Bordeaux, F-33600 Pessac, France.

*Corresponding author S. Matar matar@icmcb-bordeaux.cnrs.fr; abouliess@gmail.com

A R T I C L E I N F O

Article history:

Received ........

Accepted........

Available online ####

Keywords:

Lone pair

Stereochemistry

DFT

ELF

COOP

2

A B S T R A C T

Based on the stereochemistry of 6s2 (E) lone pair elements Pb

II and Bi

III, designated by M*,

the related PbO, BiOF and Bi2NbO5F crystal structures were revisited. Lone pair presence

determined by its sphere of influence E, equal to those of oxygen or fluorine anions, was

settled by its center then giving M*-E directions and distances. Detailed description of

structural features of both elements in these three compounds characterized by [PbEO]n and

[BiEO]n layers allowed to show the evolution of M*-E versus the coordination polyhedra. All

are different, in red PbO one finds {PbEO4E4} square antiprism, a {[Bi.E]O4F4Fapical}

monocapped square antiprism in BiOF and {BiEO4F4}square antiprism in Bi2NbO5F. To

analyze the crystal chemistry results, the electronic structures of these compounds were

calculated within density functional theory DFT. Real space analyses of electron localization

illustrate a full volume development of the lone pair on PbII within {PbEO4E4} and Bi

III

within {BiEO4F4} square antiprisms, contrary to BiIII

within {[Bi.E]O4F4Fapical} monocapped

square antiprism. Larger hardness and band gap characterize BiOF versus PbO due to the

presence of F which brings antibonding Bi-F interactions oppositely to mainly bonding Bi-O.

2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

3

I. Introduction

The ions exhibiting an ns2 outer electronic configuration are often stereochemically active

(designated here by M*). As soon as 1940 Sidgwick and Powell [1] underlined the equal

importance of bonding pairs and lone pairs of electrons. Gillespie and Nyholm [2] and

Gillespie and Hargitaï [3] assumed that lone pairs are larger than bond pairs with the corollary

that repulsion between electron pairs decreases in the order lone pair-lone pair > lone pair-

bonding pair > bonding pair- bonding pair. This way to describe structure is achieved in the

"Valence-Shell Electron-Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) model of molecular geometry".

Andersson and Aström [4] showed that the lone pair, designated by E, completes effectively

the coordination polyhedron around the M* cation nucleus, occupying a volume of the same

order as that of an oxygen or fluorine anion. On this base the descriptions of several structures

were developed confirming the presence of E, evidenced in the network by a large vacancy,

welcoming a sphere having O2-

or F- size, whose virtual centre was geometrically determined

taking care of surrounding atoms. Then this localization allowed to appreciate the M*-E

distance E was called "sphere of influence" keeping in mind that the centroïd of lone pair, Ec,

remains located around M* [5,6]. E volume is unaffected by any atomic presence.

Nevertheless E centre being determined, M*-E direction then M*-Ec, which reasonably

merges with it, were clearly indicated. Worthy to note that M*-Ec distances have been

determined by ab Initio calculations both for N(III) and P(III) giving 0.38Å and 0.57Å in

these two cases [7]. In the present paper the aim is to follow the evolution of E and therefore

M*-E distance within the three-dimensional network of 6s2 elements Pb(II) and Bi(III) when

the atomic surrounding of M* and E is being modified. To do so three compounds, the red

PbO (litharge), BiOF and Bi2NbO5F [8, 9, 10] were selected for the present study. In this

context, their chemical formulas are labeled with the E lone pair as: PbOE, BiOFE and

Bi2NbO5FE2 in which E is described and illustrated on one hand and the electronic band

structures are reexamined in the light of E sphere of influence within the quantum density

functional theory (DFT) [11, 12] on the other hand. Within DFT framework the electronic

structures of PbO and BiOF have been investigated [13,14] with results stressing the trends of

electronic structures in the two varieties of PbO on one hand and within the BiOX series the

changes due to the chemical nature of X halogen on the other hand. Concerning Bi2NbO5F

whose structure was early determined by Aurivillius in the I4/mmm space group [9], (cf. Figs.

1,2) a more recent structure determination by neutron powder diffraction [15] led to a lower

4

symmetry structure in the Pca21 space group but closely related to the Aurivillius phase [9].

The ferroelectric properties were recently investigated by Erdinc et al. [16] within the local

density approximation (LDA) [17]. Nevertheless for the purpose of focusing on the study of

the E 6s2 lone pair effects comparatively between the three title compounds, the calculations

were carried out here within the initial closely related I4/mmm space group.

II Stereochemistry of 6s2 lone pairs of Pb(II) and Bi(III) in the title compounds.

Cell parameters, internal atomic coordinates and reduced volumes of the three compounds are

summarized in Table 1 together with calculated ones resulting from full geometry

optimization (cf. section III). Cell reduced volumes V(O,F,E) are simply calculated by

dividing cell volumes by the number of oxygen, fluorine and lone pairs of the cell, owing that

E approximately exhibits the same volume as O2-

or F- anions. The large V(O,F,E) magnitude

of PbOE is an indication of a large expansion of E, contrary to the two other values for Bi

compounds. In spite of the close magnitudes of the Bi based compounds, the smaller

V(O,F,E) (BiOFE) is an indication of a constrained development of the lone pair. These

points will be further quantified throughout this work.

Table 1 – Experimental and (calculated) crystal data of red PbOE, BiOFE and Bi2NbO5FE2 (E designating the

lone pair). The three compounds crystallize in tetragonal system with the space groups P4/nmm for PbO and

BiOF with O at (2a): 0,0,0, Bi, Pb and F at (2c): 0,½,z and I4/mmm for Bi2NbO5F with Nb at 2(a): 0,0,0; Bi and

O/F in 4(e): 0,0,zO/F; O1 in 4(c): 0,½,0 ; O2 in 4(d): 0,½,¼.

a (Å) c (Å) z V (Å3) Z V(O,F,E) (Å

3)

Red PbOE [7] 3.947(3.91) 4.988(4.82) zPb 0.238(0.23) 77.71(73.7) 2 19.4

BiOFE [8] 3.747(3.73) 6.226(6.19) zBi 0.208(0.214)

zF 0.650(0.647)

87.41(86.3) 2 14.6

Bi2NbO

5FE

2[10] 3.835(3.87) 16.63(16.77) zBi 0.325(0.322)

zOF 0.120(0.125)

244.6(251.1) 2 15.3

Red PbOE form is built up by PbO4E square pyramids sharing edges and corners forming

parallel [PbOE]n layers packed along [001]. A perspective view of the structure is given in

Fig. 1. E situated at the apex of PbO4E SP shows a Pb-E = 0.78Å distance. In the figures E

sphere of influence is represented by a pale blue ellipse and its centre by a blue dot; the choice

of an ellipse allows indicating the direction in which E exerts its sterical influence. [PbE] are

5

alternatively distributed above and below a perfect square net of oxygens. This entity is

developed inside a large square antiprism {[PbE]O4E4} formed by four oxygens and four lone

pairs of the following [PbOE]n layer (Fig. 2). The layer thickness reaches 3.951Å while E-E

interlayer distances amounts 1.046Å. This shows that lone pair-lone pair interactions, which

finally associate these [PbO4E]n layers, could be compared to Van der Waals ones. Red PbOE

is an insulator.

BiOF crystal structure determination has been performed on synthetic single crystal.

Therefore it was also discovered as a mineral, zavaritskite. BiOFE network shows remarkable

features with its [BiOE]n layer, parallel to [001], analogous to [PbOE]n ones with oxygen

atoms making a perfect square lattice. Bi atoms are alternately up and down above this

oxygen layer with short Bi-O bonds exhibiting some covalent character. From a structural

point of view [BiOE]n layer is absolutely similar to [Bi2O2E2]n layer of the Aurivillius phase

[Bi2O2E2]NbO3F [9]. Bi3+

then exhibits the classical coordination CN = 4+1 in form of a

square pyramid BiO4E. Therefore, in BiOFE, these [BiOE]n layers are separated by puckered

fluorine double layers (puckering angle 90.2° (Fig. 1). These layers dramatically modify

Bi3+

stereochemistry compared to Pb2+

. Five Bi-F interactions are formed, the shortest one

along [001], Bi-Fap = 2.752 Å, and four others Bi-Fabcd these four fluorines making a square

net parallel to (001) with F-F = 3.747Å. Finally [Bi.E] appear encapsulated in a monocapped

square antiprism [Bi.E]O4Fa4Fap (Fig. 1). Note that Bi-Fap is slightly smaller than Bi-Fa

distances by 0.041Å in spite of the presence of E. Taking into account the network features,

particularly the Bi-Fap and F-F distances, E has been localized at Bi-E = 0.386Å which

implies acceptable E-O and E-F distances. Worthy to note the important diminution of Bi-E

compare to Pb-E the encapsulation in the regular nine-fold polyhedron {O4F5} being

reasonably responsible of this fact, making this [Bi.E](O4F5) unit (Fig. 2).

6

Figure 1: (color online) PbOE - [PbO4E] square pyramid and [O4Ea4] square antiprism

around PbE. [PbOE]n layers are packed along [001] "associated" via a double layer of lone

pairs. BiOFE - [BiOE]n layers, isostructural with [PbOE]n ones, are now separated by a

double layer of fluorines just intercalated and BiE sits inside a monocapped [O4Fa4Fap]

square antiprism. Fap is exactly in Bi-E direction (dotted red line) (atoms: Bi blue, O red, F

green, E pale blue). Bi2NbO5FE2 - [Bi2O2E2]n layer is closely related to those of PbOE and

BiOFE but the oxygen square net is slightly smaller than the former and bigger than the

second (see Table 1). Intercalated between these layers there is (Nb2O2(OF)2)n layer, built up

by NbO4(OF)2 octahedra sharing corners alike in tin fluoride SnF4 ((OF) green-red color

represents half-half mixture of O and F).

7

In BiOFE the established bonding explains why O-O distances are smaller than in PbOE due

to the BiE-Fa interaction parallel to (001) and also, even weak, with Bi-Fap along [001].

These interactions pull out of oxygen plane Bi atoms and also squeezing O-Bi-O angles

compared to O-Pb-O (see Table 2). Such fact explains why Bi-Bi intra layer planes is

increased compared to PbOE case. [Bi.E]-Fa interactions are also responsible for a cell

contraction compared to PbOE ones 3.796Å against 3.947Å.

Figure 2 - Comparison of PbE and BiE environments in PbOE, BiOFE and Bi2NbO5FE2:

a) PbEO4Ea4 square antiprism ; b) [Bi.E]O4Fa4Fap monocapped square antiprism; c) BiEO4F4

square antiprism.

Finally the 3+ charge of Bi atom associated with relativistic effect explains the complicated

stereochemistry of Bi with a close centre E making a large deformed [Bi.E]3+

cation. It

implies that 6s2 centroïd of the electronic doublet moves in an enlarged cap of Bi

3+ cation

volume, a cap whose axis is coiled to Bi-E-F direction. Then the distortion of the electronic

cloud around the nucleus leads to this wide monocapped square antiprism [Bi.E]O4F5.

8

For the sake of comparison some crystal data (distances, bonds and angles) characterizing

these structures are given in Table 2. Bi-Fap interaction through E volume is weak, the

distance 2.921Å being affected by the presence of E between these atoms

Owing the difference between Pb and Bi oxidation states some bond distances are bigger in

PbOE than in BiOFE as shown in Table 2 together with some others. Worthy to note that in

BiOFE O-Bi-O angle value is smaller than O-Pb-O by some 3.4°, directly linked to EBi-E

lone pair - Bi-O bond pair repulsion in synergy with Bi-O bond and Bi-E distance shortening.

Table 2 – Selected bonds, interatomic distances (Å) and angles (°) in PbOE, (BiOE)(F) and

(Bi2E2)NbO5F or (BiOE)2(NbO2(OF)2. Fap stands for apical F; the other fluorine are labeled

Fa .

PbOE Pb-E 0.782 O-O 2.791 E-Ea 2.980 O-Pb-O 74.5°

Pb-O 2.304 E-O 2.789 Ea-Ea 3.947

BiOFE Bi-E 0.368 Bi-Fa 2.748 F-F 3.747 O-Bi-O 71.1°

Bi-O 2.273 O-O 2.650 E-O 2.500 E-Fa 2.674

Bi-Fap 2.921 F-Fap 3.438 E-Fap 2.553

Bi2NbO5FE2 Bi-E 0.682 Bi- (OF) 2.862 (OF)-(OF) 3.835 O-Bi-O 72.7°

Bi-O 2.287 O-O 2.712 E-O 2.720 E-(OF) 2.722

To emphasize the particular influence of these fluorine layers between the double layer of

lone pairs in [Bi2O2E2]n which create this monocapped square antiprism [Bi.E]O4Fa4Fap it is

interesting to show the result of the introduction of a slab [NbO3F]n, isostructural to SnF4,

built up by [NbO2(OF)2] octahedra sharing corners (Fig. 1). The resulting Bi2NbO5F

oxyfluoride is the prototype (n = 1) of a large series [Bi2O2E2]2

n

+

[An-1BnO3n+1]2

n

-

of compounds

developed by Aurivillius [10]. The full disorder between O and F anions has been simplified,

oxygen anions being assigned in the equatorial positions and remaining oxygen and fluorine

(OF) were equally distributed onto apices. As shown in Fig. 1 this [NbO3F]n layer leaves full

space for Bi lone pair along fourfold axis alike in PbOE. Therefore it remains a weak bonding

Bi-(OF) = 2.862 Å with the apices of [NbO2(OF)2] octahedra, but in roughly similar

9

geometric conditions as Pb-Ea or Bi-Fa in previous structures but with no barrier for E

development Bi2NbO5FE2. Then Bi-E = 0.68 Å distance becomes closer to Pb-E = 0.782Å.

These structural comparisons have allowed to appreciate the lone pair role in the network

architecture by its sphere of influence which appears rather constant and by its adjustment via

M*-E distance versus the cations, here Pb2+

and Bi3+

in three different configurations with

M*-E = 0.78 Å, 0.37 Å and 0.68 Å respectively and PbE in open square antiprism [O4Ea4],

[BiE] enclosed in a monocapped square antiprism [O4F5] and BiE in an open square antiprism

[O4(OF)4].

In this context it became of paramount importance to analyze in detail the electronic

distributions in these structures to enlighten these conclusions. Based on electronic band

structure calculations, they are developed in the forthcoming paragraphs.

III Computational framework

Within DFT two computational methods were used in a complementary manner. The Vienna

ab initio simulation package (VASP-PAW) code [18,19] allows accurate protocols of

geometry optimization, energy volume equations of state (EOS) and the electron localization

maps (ELF). Then a full account of the electronic structure and of the properties of chemical

bonding (not implemented in VASP) is done with full potential all electrons augmented

spherical wave (ASW) method [20,21]. The DFT exchange-correlation effects were

considered following the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) according to the scheme

of Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof (PBE) [22]. Details on the methods can be found in a recent

review [23] and therein references.

Elaborating on the question “where are the electrons?” the chemical bonding for pair

interactions is analyzed qualitatively using the crystal orbital overlap populations (COOP)

based on the overlap matrix elements Sij [24]. In the plots positive, negative and zero

magnitude COOP indicate bonding, anti-bonding and non bonding interactions respectively.

Another visualization of the localization of the electrons can be obtained through the electron

localization function (ELF) introduced by Becke and Edgecomb [25]. ELF which results from

real space analysis of the electron density is a normalized function with 0 ≤ ELF ≤1. ELF = 0

correspond to zero localization (blue zones) whereas full electron localization areas are

10

assigned ELF = 1 (strong localization; red zones); ELF = ½ correspond to a free electron gas

behavior (green zones) –cf. Figs. 4.

Geometry optimization and energy volume equation of state.

From Table 1, the structure unconstrained full geometry optimizations for the three structures

provide good agreement with experiment for the cell parameters, volumes and z coordinates

of Bi, F and Pb. The larger discrepancy found for Bi2NbO5F is due to the symmetry breaking

upon going from body center I mode of I4/mmm space group to the primitive P mode through

operating the (½,½,½) translations leading to a doubling of the number of atoms needed to

account for the occupation of the 4e (0,0,zO/F) positions by 50% of O and F (cf. Figs. 2c and

4c). Nevertheless the agreement is good enough to obtain the ELF (cf. next section) and to

derive trends in the physical properties of the title compounds pertaining to the mechanical

properties, i.e. the response of the crystal lattice to external pressure. This is particularly

relevant in view of the larger volume of BiOF versus PbO with a significantly larger c/a ratio:

c/a(BiOF) = 1.66 versus c/a(PbO) = 1.18. Also in spite of the similarity of the [BiOE]n layer

with the [Bi2O2E2]n layer in Bi2NbO5F, it becomes important to identify the mechanical role

played by the additional Nb-O-F motifs, i.e. with [Bi2O2E2][NbO3F].

The mechanical properties can be rationalized from the equilibrium zero pressure parameters

obtained from the energy-volume, E(V), equation-of-state (EOS). The calculations around

minima found from geometry optimization provide E,V pair values and the resulting E = f(V)

curves (Fig. 3). The fit of the curves with a Birch EOS [26] E(V) = Eo(Vo) +

[9/8]VoBo[([(Vo)/V])2/3

–1]2 + [9/16]Bo(B

’–4)Vo[([(Vo)/V])

2/3–1]

3, leads to Eo, Vo, Bo and B

’,

designating the equilibrium energy, volume, bulk modulus and its pressure derivative

respectively. The low 2 magnitudes designate the goodness of fit, i.e. the lower the

2 , the

better the fit.

11

50 60 70 80 90

-22

-21

-20

-19

-18

-17

-16

-15

-14

Data: Data2_PbO

Model: Birch3

2 = 10

-5

E0= -21.54 eV

B0= 88 GPa

V0 = 76.55 Å

3

B'= 4.62

Energ

y (

eV

)

Volume (Å3)

a)

60 70 80 90 100 110 120

-32

-31

-30

-29Data: Data1_BiOF

Model: Birch3

2 = 10

-5

E0= -32.45 eV

B0= 122 GPa

V0 =88.64 Å

3

B' =4.65

Energ

y (

eV

)

Volume (Å3)

b)

200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340

-124

-122

-120

-118

-116

-114

-112 Data: Data3_Bi2NbO

5F

Model: Birch3

2 = 1.3 10

-4

E0= -123.20 eV

B0= 157 GPa

V0 = 251.64 Å

3

B'= 4.47

Energ

y (

eV

)

Volume (Å3)

c)

Fig. 3 Energy volume curves and fit values (in the insert) from Birch 3rd

order equation of

state. 2: the goodness-of-fit. A) PbO , b) BiOF and c) Bi2NbO5F.

12

The fit curves given in the insert reproduce the trends of the geometry optimization for the

volume with a better agreement of the volume with the experiment as with respect to

geometry optimization (Table 1). The corresponding zero pressure bulk modules: B0(PbO) =

88 GPa and B0(BiOF) = 122 GPa are significantly different and range below the magnitudes

observed for oxides (~200 GPa) while approaching those usually found in (soft) alloys [27].

From the respective B0 magnitudes PbO is a readily compressible oxide versus harder BiOF.

But such trends somehow are opposite to the expected ones regarding volume considerations:

the larger the volume, the more compressible the compound. Consequently the larger

incompressibility of BiOF can be assigned to the presence of fluorine atoms in the interplanes

of [BiOE]n on top of BiE and BiE-F interaction should be repulsive as shown in next section

through the COOP. On the contrary the empty space between [PbOE]n layers leads to a

largely compressible oxide (cf. Figs.1). Finally in Bi2NbO5F, the additional [NbO3F] motifs,

adjoined to [Bi2O2E2] ones have the role of decreasing the compressibility of the quaternary

compound. Note that also at the atomic constituents’ level, the bulk module of Nb ~170 GPa

is much higher than Bi ~ 31 GPa. Lastly B’ pressure derivatives of B0 magnitudes are close to

those usually found in the solid state [28].

Electron localization function ELF

Fig. 4 shows for PbOE, BiOFE and Bi2NbO5FE2 the electron localization function ELF plots

of isosurfaces around the atomic constituents (for 3D volume view) and the plane slices –2D

views–. The color legend shown in the rular, i.e. blue, green and red ELF areas corresponding

to zero, free electron (ELF = ½) like and full localization (ELF = 1).

Looking at O-Pb-O and O-Bi-O connections one can visualize the Pb-O and Bi-O bonding

with almost the same shape of 3D ELF for both. But large changes are observed in the middle

of the subfigures where the ELF isosurface around Bi shows a large flattening contrary to its

large extension towards the empty PbOE interlayers characterized by ELF = 0 blue zones. As

discussed in the crystal chemistry first sections, this is a signature of the 6s2 lone pair which

can only take a full extension in Pb(II) whereas the presence of F hinders 6s2 extension of

Bi(III) in BiOF and repulsive lone pair–F- can be expected. The ELF slices highlight

furthermore this peculiar feature and show larger blue ELF = 0 extending towards Bi – F

interlayer as well as at the top of the panels between F layers and apical O. Green ELF ~ ½

13

free electron like can be seen between Pb and O as well as between Bi and O, signalling the

bonding between them, oppositely to the blue zones between Bi and F whence a less bonding

or antibonding Bi-F bonding as it will be discussed in next section. Consequently nothing

opposes to the compression of PbO as with respect to BiOF thus comforting the bulk module

magnitudes calculated above. The ELF features presented by the quaternary compound

complete our understanding by showing the full development of the Bi lone pair within the

free apical space of the BiEO4F4 square antiprism depicted in Fig. 2c.

Lastly we note that the presented electron localization picture is not that of an ionic like cation

– anion one but corresponds more to covalent PbO and iono-covalent BiOF, the larger ionic

property being brought by fluorine. In this context we suggest that the peculiar behavior of

BiOF can be related with the property of ionic conductivity and the fluorine ion mobility

formerly studied by us experimentally in the oxyfluoride as well as in solid solutions of BiOF

with fluorite-type β-PbF2 [28, 29].

14

a)

b)

15

c)

Figure 4 - ELF isosurfaces (3D grey shells) and vertical planes zone slices (2D) in a) PbOE, b) BiOFE and c)

Bi2NbO5FE2. The rular shows the correspondance of colors with ELF normalized functions values.

16

Figure 5 – PbOE ELF isosurface on the plane (100) and correlation with the crystal chemistry descrption of E.

The ELF slice picture (right part) shows PbE shell like it appears on the plane (100). It

exhibits a pear external form. From structural investigation of numerous crystal structures

[5,6] the radius of lone pair E sphere of influence was settled at RE = 1.27 Å and average RPb

was found equal to 0.94 Å. As indicated previously Pb-E = 0.78 Å. So a geometric picture of

PbE was readily designed (left part). Both geometric drawing and ELF slice were settled with

same scalar dimensions for sake of comparison.

The highest dimension of PbE, i.e. h = RE + Pb-E + RPb = 2.99 Å.

The calibration of the PbE shell in ELF slice was then determined. A rather good agreement is

found between the experimental stereochemical picture deduced from X-ray crystal structure

and ELF shape. In the largest size of ELF pear which correspond to the volume of E we find

2.565 Å which corresponds well to geometric 2RE = 2.54 Å. The same holds with total high of

the ELF pear or sphere packing with 2.866 Å against 2.99 Å. The size of electronic cloud

around Pb2+

appears slightly blown under E influence being increased up to 1.046 Å to top

17

and 1.074 Å to its equatorial size while its radius is settled at 0.94 Å. When superposed both

pictures show a remarkable adequacy.

A reasonable adequacy has also been observed with the BiOF and Bi2NbO5F compounds. In

the former worthy to note that the pear like form of the electronic shell is somewhat flattened

in the bottom. Its evaluated high, h = 2.30Å, diminished by Fap repulsion is also enlarged but

the geometric model with h = 2.55Å remains reasonably close; E volume is maintained by

enlargement of its "pear" base. In the second the height of the shell h = 2.60Å; the simple

addition h = RE + Bi-E + RBi = 2.84Å remains in the vicinity. Note that experiments report

about phases studied at room temperature by X-ray diffraction while ELF correspond to 0K.

Electronic structure and chemical bonding

The above partial conclusions should be confirmed with an account of the electronic band

structures and chemical bonding properties. In so far that the calculated structure parameters

are close to experiment for the title compounds (Table 1) we use the latter for the analysis of

the electronic band structure with the all electrons, scalar relativistic ASW method [20,21]. In

the minimal basis set used by the ASW method the valence states and the matrix elements

were constructed using partial waves up to lmax+1 = 3 for Bi Nb and Pb and lmax+1 = 2 for O

and F. Also the low energy lying and filled subshells of F(2s2), O(2s

2) as well as Bi and Pb

5d10

were not considered as part of the valence basis sets and replaced by higher level

corresponding empty states, thus contributing better to the completeness of the valence basis

set.

The band structures along the main directions of the simple tetragonal Brillouin Zone BZ (for

PbO and BiOF) and the body centered BZ (for Bi2NbO5F) are given in Figs. 5. They are

adjoined with the corresponding panels of the site projected density of states PDOS and the

chemical bonding with the COOP criterion. In all panels the energy reference is taken with

respect to the top of the valence band (VB) at EV because the three compounds are insulating.

Comparing firstly PbO and BiOF, there is an almost twice larger band gap in the latter: In

PbO at the M point the large band dispersion in the lower part of the conduction band (CB)

due to itinerant s like states is responsible of the closing of the band gap. As a general trend

the VB is dominated by two blocks, the low energy bands are s like arising from the Bi and

Pb. They are found at -10 eV in BiOF and at -8 eV in PbO and differently separated from the

p-block bands at the top of the VB, i.e. with much larger separation in BiOF versus PbO. The

18

p-bands arise from all the constituents and show a slightly narrower and less dispersed

behavior in BiOF versus PbO. Such observations are signatures of the less covalent character

of BiOF with respect to PbO due to the ionic character introduced by fluorine. Similar band

features to PbO appear for Bi2NbO5F as for instance the dispersve at the bottom of the CB and

the similar magnitude of the band gap. This arises from the mainly covalent character of the

compound with majority of oxygen atoms on one hand and the similar

The site projected densities of states (PDOS) reflect the band structures aspects above and

provide additional information on the weight of each constituent’s valence states such as the

dominating s like states of Bi and Pb at lowest energies and the relative weights of F and O p-

states in the block reaching the top of the VB at EV. Particularly this illustrates the dominant

O states in PbO due to the larger electronegativity of O versus Pb and the admixture of

dominating F and O in BiOF for the same reasons. However a peculiar feature can be

observed in BiOF p-block where the PDOS of Bi and O have similar skylines oppositely to Bi

and F. It can be suggested a stronger Bi-O bonding versus Bi-F. As suggested by the band

structures, the DOS general shape of Bi2NbO5F show some similarities with PbO’s fo rteh gap

magnitude and the broad CB, but the VB exhibit differences due to the larger complexity of

the structure which contains Bi and Nb cations and O and F anions in different proportions.

Due to the large number of O in the quaternary structure, the O p-states are dominant at the

top of the VB. The bonding natures and strengths are analyzed with the plots of the partial

COOP. Whereas the valence band in PbO is of mainly bonding character with positive COOP

magnitudes along the y-axis, in BiOF the Bi-O bonds are mainly bonding and they present

negative anti-bonding magnitudes at the top of the VB. Nevertheless they are of larger

magnitude than Bi-F bonds which show largely anti-bonding character in a broad energy

range from -2 eV up to EV. Then antibonding BiE–F indicates repulsive effects of the 6s2 lone

pair pointing between the two atoms. In Bi2NbO5F Bi-O and Nb-O bonds are proportionally

larger than Bi-F and Nb-F. Similarly to BiOF Bi-O interactions are of mainly bonding nature

in spite of the antibonding peak at the top of the VB, whereas Bi-F present relatively larger

antibonding character.

19

Figure 6 - Electronic band structure (left), site projected DOS (middle) and chemical bonding (right) in a) PbO,

b) BiOF and c) Bi2NbO5F.

20

Concluding remarks

In this work we have shown that the virtual character of crystal chemistry approach of E lone

pair can be rationalized and illustrated further with the support of DFT based quantum

calculations. Particularly in three compounds based on 6s2 lone pair Pb

II and Bi

III , we have

identified via ELF analysis, significant differences of expansion of E according to whether it

is found in a square antiprism: {PbEO4E4} in PbO and {BiEO4F4} in Bi2NbO5F contrary to

{[Bi.E]O4F4Fapical} in BiOF where apical F hinders E expansion. As a result larger hardness

and band gap characterize BiOF versus PbO concomitantly with the development of

antibonding Bi-F interactions oppositely to mainly bonding Bi-O in all compounds. In order

to show the complementarities of the two approaches a sketch of the correlation of quantum

chemistry with the crystal chemistry description of E has been provided for PbOE.

Acknowledgments. The authors express their thanks to Pr. Jean Etourneau for organizing a

fruitful meeting completed by stimulating scientific discussions. Computations were

conducted on the MCIA-University of Bordeaux computer centre. Supports from CNRS and

Conseil Régional d’Aquitaine are gratefully acknowledged.

21

REFERENCES

[1] N. V. Sidgwick and H. M. Powell, Proc. R. Soc., London, Ser. A 176, 153 (1940).

[2] R. J. Gillespie and R. S. Nyholm, Q. Rev. Chem. Soc. 11, 339 (1957).

[3] R. J. Gillespie and I. Hargittaï, "The VSEPR Model of Molecular Geometry",

Allyn and Bacon, p.149 (1991).

[4] S. Andersson and A. Aström, "Solid State Chemistry" Proc. 5th

Material Research

Symposium, p3, NMS special publication 364 (1972).

[5] J. Galy, G. Meunier, S. Andersson and A. Aström, J. Solid State Chem., 13, 142 (1975).

[6] J. Galy and R. Enjalbert, J. Solid State Chem., 44, 1 (1982).

[7] A. Schmiedekamp, D.W.J. Cruickshank, S. Skaarup, P. Pulay, I. Hargittaï and J.E. Boggs,

J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101, 2002 (1979).

[8] W. J. Moore and L. Pauling, JACS, 63, 1392, 1941.

[9] B. Aurivillius, Acta Chem. Scand., 18, 1823 (1964).

[10] B. Aurivillius, Arkiv. Kemi., 4, 39, (1952).

[11] P. Hohenberg, W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. B, 136, 864 (1964)

[12] W. Kohn, L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev. A, 140, 1133 (1965).

[13] W. L. Huang, J Comput Chem. 30, 1882-91 (2009):. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21191.

[14] H. J. Terpstra, R.A. de Groot, C. Haas, Phys. Rev. B, 52, 11690 (1995)

[15] E. E. McCabe, I. P. Jones, D. Zhang, N. C. Hyatt, C. Greaves,

J. Mater. Chem., 17, 1193 (2007).

[16] B. Erdinc, E. McCabe, D. Duran, M. N. Secuk, S. E. Gulebaglan, E. K. Dogan, M.

Aycibin, H. Akkus, GU J Sci., 27, 1099 (2014)

[17] D.M. Ceperley, B. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45; 566 (1980)

[18] G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B, 54, 11169 (1996).

22

[19] G. Kresse, J. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B, 59, 1758 (1999).

[20] A.R. Williams, J. Kübler, C.D. Gelatt Jr., Phys. Rev., B 19, 6094 (1979).

[21] V. Eyert, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 77, 1007 (2000).

[22] J. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 3865 (1996).

[23] S. F. Matar, Prog. Solid State. Chem., 41, 55-85 (2013).

[24] R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 26, 846 (1987).

[25] A. D. Becke, K. E. Edgecombe,

J. Chem. Phys.,92, 5397 (1990) and Nature, 371, 683 (1994).

[26] F. Birch, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 1257 (1978).

[27] S.F. Matar, Solid State Sci., 12, 59 (2010).

[28] S. F. Matar, J.-M. Réau, L. Rabardel, G. Demazeau, P. Hagenmuller.

Solid State Ionics, 11, 77 (1983).

[29] S. F. Matar, J.-M. Réau, P. Hagenmuller, J. of Fluorine Chem., 20, 529 (1982).