1 Copyright © 2011 by ASME
Proceedings of the ASME/JSME 8th Thermal Engineering Joint Conference AJTEC2011
March 13-17, 2011, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
AJTEC2011-44393
FEASIBILITY OF VORTEX TUBE AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM
Mohammad O. Hamdan United Arab Emirates University
Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Ahmed Alawar United Arab Emirates University
Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Emad Elnajjar United Arab Emirates University
Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Waseem Siddique United Arab Emirates University
Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE
ABSTRACT This paper investigates the feasibility of using vortex tube
as air-conditioning device. Series of experiments are conducted
to evaluate the design parameters and calculate the
performances of counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube
(RHVT). The study is conducted for different inlet pressures
conditions, number of nozzle inlets, vortex chamber depth and
thermal insulation condition. The vortex tube performance is
investigated by measuring temperatures, pressures and mass
flow rates for the inlet and hot/cold exits. It is found that vortex
tube has very coefficient of performance which make it
inadequate to compete with conventional air conditioning
system.
NOMENCLATURE ��� coefficient of performance
�� specific heat constant, kJ/kg-K
� vortex tube inner diameter, �
��� inlet pressure, bar
� hot mass flow rate, kg/s
� � cold mass flow rate, kg/s
� �� inlet mass flow rate, kg/s
RHVT Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube
� air gas constant, kJ/kg-K
hot outlet temperature, °�
� cold outlet temperature, °�
�� inlet temperature, °�
∆ temperature difference between the inlet and the hot
out, ∆ �� � �
∆ � temperature difference between the inlet and the cold
outlet, ∆ � � �� � �
� cold mass fraction
INTRODUCTION The Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube (RHVT) is a thermal
mechanical device that separates the energy of a compressed
gas flow two opposite streams; one stream colder than the inlet
temperature while the other stream is hotter than the inlet
temperature. The vortex tube does not have any moving part
and the separation is occurred due to swirl flow generation
without requiring any external work or heat transfer. The vortex
tube was first discovered by Ranque in 1928 while
experimenting on vortex tube pump [1-2], a metallurgist and
physicist who was granted a French patent for the device in
1932, and a United States patent in 1934. Later in 1945, Rudolf
Hilsch [3] conducted an experiment on vortex tube that focused
on the thermal performance with different inlet pressure and
different geometrical parameters.
In the recent years it was known that vortex tube is a low
cost and an effective solution for many cooling problem. The
separation mechanism inside the vortex tube was not
completely understood until today [4]. The ability to obtain
either hot or cold flow streams using compressed gas, allowed
the use of vortex tube in many engineering applications such as
cooling of electronics, cooling of food, cooling of firemen's
suit, cooling of machinery during operation. In spite of its small
capacity, the RHVT is very useful for certain thermal
management applications because it of simplicity, compactness,
Proceedings of the ASME/JSME 2011 8th Thermal Engineering Joint Conference AJTEC2011
March 13-17, 2011, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
AJTEC2011-44393
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/27/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
2 Copyright © 2011 by ASME
light weight, robustness, reliability, low maintenance cost and
safety [5]. The RHVT can be classified into two types: (1) the
counter-flow RHVT and (2) the uni-flow RHVT [6]. In the
counter flow RHVT type the cold flow move in the opposite
direction with respect to hot stream while in the second type,
the hot and cold streams flow in same direction. In general, the
counter-flow RHVT is recommended over the uni-flow RHVT
for its efficient energy separation [6].
Vortex tube is covered extensively in literatures through
experimental and numerical analysis. The experimental work of
Nimbalkar and Muller [7] indicated that there is an optimum
diameter of cold end orifice for achieving maximum energy
separation. Also, the results [7] show that the maximum value
of energy separation was always reachable at a 60% cold
fraction irrespective of the orifice diameter and the inlet
pressure. The optimum diameter to length ratio of the hot side
was investigated by Dincer et al. [8, 9]. Vortex tube
performance was investigated for three different working gases:
air, oxygen and nitrogen and results were reported using
streakline visualizations in a vortex tube made of Perspex [10].
The effect of vortex entrance condition is reported in [11]
which indicate that vortex tube can be enhanced by rounding
the entrance. It was reported [6] that cooling the vortex tube
can enhance the cooling capability by 5-9%. Xue and
Arjomandi [12] reported that the vortex angle has direct effect
on vortex tube and that a smaller vortex angle demonstrated a
larger temperature difference and better performance for the
heating efficiency of the vortex tube. Scientists worked in
improving vortex tube by redesign the nozzle, gas inlet and
utilizing diffuser vortex tube which showed reasonable
enhancement compared to current design [13]. A modification
to vortex tube was proposed [14] by introducing double-circuit
vortex tube which showed enhancement in the vortex tube
performance.
Other scientist modeled and analyzed the vortex tube
using numerical analysis with different turbulent model.
Numerical study showed acceptable agreement with published
data [15-18]. A full discuss of 3D numerical study is presented
in reference [16] which report maximum COP of the vortex
tube is found to be 0.59 as a heat engine and 0.83 as a
refrigerator. Behera et al. [16] reported numerically that the
secondary flow degrade the performance of the vortex tube. It
was reported that the magnitude of velocity angle is reversely
proportional to the vortex pipe diameter [18].
The current study investigates the effect of number of
inlet nozzles, vortex stopper location, vortex tube insulation
and inlet pressure. The effect of vortex tube in energy
separation is reported using outlets temperature and cold mass
fraction.
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP A two-dimensional cross section of used vortex tube is
shown in Fig. 1. A room temperature compressed air is used as
working fluid at different inlet pressure values. The compressed
air enters in the middle of the vortex tube to chamber that
distribute the air into multiple inlet nozzles that promote vortex
flow generation within the vortex generator. The vortex flow
get separated to two outlets where hot air leaves from the outer
parameter of the vortex while cold air leave from the center of
vortex at the opposite direction as shown in figure (1a). The
schematic diagram of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2.
(a)
(b) FIGURE. 1 THE VORTEX TUBE; (a) A 2-D CROSS-SECTION OF
THE VORTEX TUBE AND (b) VORTEX GENERATOR.
FIGURE. 2 A SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF THE TEST BED WITH
POINT OF DATA COLLECTION.
The compressed air is provided through compressor
storage tank to assure uniform pressure with minimum
variation. The compressor maximum rated pressure is 12 bars,
even though all runs where for inlet pressure of 5 bar or less.
The compressed gas passed through a humidifier and particle
separation filter to assure the use of clean dry air. The air is
expanded in the vortex tube chamber and separated into hot air
stream and cold air stream. The cold stream in the central
region flows out of the tube through the central orifice nearer to
the inlet nozzle, while the hot stream in the outer annulus
leaves the tube through another outlet farther from the inlet.
The flow rate of the inlet air is regulated through flow
rotometer valve while the pressure is controlled using a
pressure controller that is attached on the compressor tank
outlet. The volumetric flow rates of the inlet and cold streams
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/27/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
3 Copyright © 2011 by ASME
are both measured by flow meters. The temperatures of the
temperature of the inlet and outlet flows are measured with
three thermocouples. In the present study, the vortex tube is
made of stainless steel with inner diameter of 10mm. The
tangential inlet nozzle has a diameter of 3mm. The whole
length of the tube is 137mm. The outlet diameter of the cold
side is 4.5 mm and hot side end is around 8 mm. The inlet flow
rate is controlled through the flow meter valve which implicitly
determines the inlet pressure. In this experiment, different inlet
pressure sets were used in the test ranging from 2-5 bars with
room inlet temperature. The uncertainty of the used type-K
thermocouple is 0.3°� which is very small.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In the present work, the effects of the (a) inlet pressure,
(b) the number of nozzles, (c) the vortex stopper location and
(d) the vortex tube insulation on the performance of RHVT are
experimentally investigated. The behavior of vortex tube when
cold and hot outlets are brought to same outlet pressure is
shown figure (3) which shows the cold and hot outlet
temperature versus the cold mass fraction (� ). The present
experimental data, figure (3), shows a good qualitative
agreement with earlier published data [3, 6] considering the
geometry and the inlet conditions differences. As expected and
reported in literature, there is a non-monotonic relation between
outlet temperature and cold mass fraction and that there is
optimum cold mass fraction for maximum hot temperature and
minimum cold temperature. As shown if figure (3), the
optimum temperature at the cold ( ∆ � � �19.9°���� �
0.098) and hot outlet (∆ � 5.6°���� � 0.098) does not occur at the same cold mass fraction.
FIGURE. 3 THE TEMPERATURE OF COLD AND HOT
OUTLETS VERSUS COLD MASS FRACTION FOR 5 BAR INLET
PRESSURE, 26 oC INLET TEMPERATURE AND 6 SWIRLING
JETS.
The effect of pressure on the optimum condition of the
vortex tube is shown in figure 4. It is clear that pressure
increase the maximum hot outlet temperature and decrease the
minimum outlet temperature, hence pressure has direct effect
on promoting separation of the energy of the flow to two
streams, as shown in figure 4a and 4b. Based on figure 4, it is
clear that the optimum mass fraction for cooling does not
depend on the operating inlet pressure (as shown in figure 4c)
while for the hot outlet flow, the optimum cold mass fraction
increases with the increase in the pressure (as shown in figure
4d).
FIGURE. 4 THE EFFECT OF INLET PRESSURE AT 26 oC INLET TEMPERATURE ON THE; (a) MINIMUM COLD
TEMPERATURE, (b) MAXIMUM HOT TEMPERATURE, (c)
COLD OUTLET AND (d) HOT OUTLET.
FIGURE. 5 THE EFFECT OF NUMBER OF NOZZELS AT 5 BAR INLET PRESSURE AND 26 oC INLET TEMPERATURE ON (a)
COLD OUTLET AND (b) HOT OUTLET.
It is commonly to use multiple jets to generate the vortex
flow inside the vortex generator show in figure 2b. The effect
of jet angle was discussed in literature [12] which shows that
smaller angel or tangent jets generate the maximum energy
separation. The effect of number of jet for same angle is shown
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/27/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
4 Copyright © 2011 by ASME
in figure 5a and 5b, which shows that as number of jet
decreases from 6 to 3 jets the optimum cold mass fraction
increases (from 10% to 22%) while the cold outlet temperature
increase marginally (by less than 1.5 degree). The single inlet
nozzle shows lower performance compare to 6 and 3 jets vortex
generator and this could be due to the uniformity of the vortex
since it is expected that as number of inlet nozzles increase, the
vortex become more stable and uniform.
The effect of vortex stopper is shown in figure 6. The
vortex stopper is a radial fin that allows the flow to move
axially in the vortex tube while stopping the vortex and
secondary flow motion as shown in figure (1a). Three different
locations of the vortex stopper are investigated and reported in
figure 6. It is clear that the location of vortex stopper has an
effect on the vortex tube performance and that as stopper move
away from the vortex generator, colder temperature is achieved.
This indicates, agreed with published work [8, 9], that the
length of the vortex chamber is directly affecting the vortex
tube performance. The vortex tube length to diameter ration is
very important design parameter which is not investigated in
this work and need more exploration. The figure (6) support the
idea that there is secondary circulation inside the vortex tube
which enhances the energy separation such in this case it is
clear that as vortex stopper move far from the vortex generator
better cooling is achieved as shown in figure (6b). The distance
from A to B and from B to C is equal to 7D.
FIGURE. 6 THE EFFECT OF NUMBER OF SWIRL STOPPER AT 5 BAR INLET PRESSURE AND 26 oC INLET TEMPERATURE ON
THE (a) COLD OUTLET AND (B) HOT OUTLET.
The effect of insulation on vortex tube is shown in figure
(7) for cold outlet, figure (7a), and hot outlet, figure (7b). The
results show that insulation has minor effect on the
performance of the vortex tube which suggest that heat loss
through the vortex tube is minimal and that most of the hear
exchange is happening inside the vortex tube where maximum
temperature difference is occurring between the cold center and
external hot vortex. It is reported in [6] that cooling the vortex
tube would promote cooling by 5-9% which was not observed
here through the insulation and no insulation case which means
that small amount of heat is lost through the vortex tube wall
and that’s why this effect was not noticeable in the current test.
FIGURE. 7 THE EFFECT OF INSULATION OF THE STEEL
VORTEX TUBE AT 5 BAR INLET PRESSURE AND 26 oC INLET
TEMPERATURE ON BOTH (a) COLD OUTLET AND (b) HOT
OUTLET.
The use of vortex tube as air conditioning device has
fascinated engineers due to its simplicity and reliability with no
moving part. The use of vortex tube as air-condition device is
not yet feasible due to low coefficient of performance as shown
in figure 8. The figure (8) shows that there is an optimum cold
mass fraction value where maximum COP exists and that as
inlet pressure decrease the COP would increase. The efficiency
of a refrigerator is expressed in terms of the coefficient of
performance (COP) which is expressed as follow, [19]:
��� ���� !�"�#�$#�
��%# !�"&'$#�
For the vortex tube, the COP is calculated by dividing the
desired output (cooling load) on required input (compression
energy). The compression energy was calculated for isothermal
process (at constant temperature) while the cooling load was
calculated for ideal gas as shown below:
��� ��(() '*+(�"
&�(�,�!��)�(�$!��� ('-'�!*.�
� ���/ �� � �0
��� ��)'/���/�2340
FIGURE. 8 THE COOLING COP VERSUS COLD FRACTION
FOR DIFFERENT INLET PRESSURE AT 26 oC INLET
TEMPERATURE.
CONCLUSION The available vortex tube is not appropriate to be used for
air conditioning system due to its low coefficient of
performance. The results show that most of the input energy is
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/27/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
5 Copyright © 2011 by ASME
lost as kinetic energy and small is converted to cooling heating
load. A series of experiments are conducted to investigate the
performance of vortex tube under several design parameters
mainly; (1) inlet pressure, (2) cold mass fraction, (3) number of
inlet nozzles, (4) vortex stopper location and (5) insulation. The
following were concluded from the experimental data:
1) The inlet pressure is the necessary driving force for the
energy separation. Experiments show that the higher the
inlet pressure, the greater the temperature difference of the
outlet streams.
2) The cold fraction is an important parameter influencing the
performance of the energy separation in the vortex tube.
3) The effect of number of nozzle is very important and that
for constant inlet pressure test, it is clear that increasing
number of nozzle increase the performance of the vortex
tube.
4) The vortex tube length (vortex stopper location) has direct
effect on the performance on the vortex tube. The data
shows that as vortex stopper move far from the vortex
generator the energy separation performance increases.
This is achieved when the vortex stopper move far from
the vortex generator from 0 to 15D.
5) Insulation has minimal effect on vortex tube cooling or
heating capabilities.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by
United Arab Emirates University. This work was financially
supported by the Research Affairs at the United Arab Emirates
University under a contract no. 01-05-7-11/09.
REFERENCES
[1] Ranque GJ., “Experiments on expansion in a vortex with
simultaneous exhaust of hot air and cold air”, J Phys
Radium (Paris) 1933; 4:112–4 S-115, June. Also translated
as General Electric Co., Schenectady Works Library 1947;
T.F. 3294.
[2] Ranque GJ., “Method and apparatus for obtaining from a
fluid under pressure two outputs of fluid at different
temperatures”, US patent 1:952,281, 1934.
[3] R. Hilsch. The use of the expansion of gases in a
centrifugal field as cooling process. Rev. Sci. Instrum.,
18(2) (1947) 108–113,
[4] Smith Eiamsa-ard, Pongjet Promvonge, “Review of
Ranque–Hilsch effects in vortex tubes”, Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12 (2008) 1822–1842
[5] Lewins J. and Bejan, A., “Vortex tube optimization
theory”, Energy 24 (1999) 931–43.
[6] S. Eiamsa-ard, K. Wongcharee, P. Promvonge,
“Experimental investigation on energy separation in a
counter-flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube: Effect of cooling
a hot tube”, International Communications in Heat and
Mass Transfer 37 (2010) 156–162
[7] Sachin U. Nimbalkar and Michael R. Muller, "An
experimental investigation of the optimum geometry for
the cold end orifice of a vortex tube", Applied Thermal
Engineering 29 (2009) 509–514
[8] K. Dincer, S. Baskaya, B.Z. Uysal, I. Ucgul, "Experimental investigation of the performance of a Ranque–Hilsch
vortex tube with regard to a plug located at the hot outlet",
international journal of refrigeration 32 (2009), 87–94.
[9] K. Dincer, S. Tasdemir, S. Baskaya, B.Z. Uysal,
"Modeling of the effects of length to diameter ratio and
nozzle number on the performance of counterflow
Ranque–Hilsch vortex tubes using artificial neural
networks", Applied Thermal Engineering 28 (2008) 2380–
2390.
[10] Orhan Aydın, Muzaffer Baki, "An experimental study on
the design parameters of a counterflow vortex tube",
Energy 31 (2006) 2763–2772.
[11] C.M. Gao, K.J. Bosschaart, J.C.H. Zeegers, A.T.A.M. de
Waele, "Experimental study on a simple Ranque–Hilsch
vortex tube", Cryogenics 45 (2005) 173–183.
[12] Yunpeng Xue, Maziar Arjomandi, "The effect of vortex
angle on the efficiency of the Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube",
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 33 (2008) 54–57.
[13] Y.T. Wu, Y. Ding, Y.B. Ji, C.F. Ma, M.C. Ge,
"Modification and experimental research on vortex tube",
International Journal of Refrigeration 30 (2007) 1042-
1049.
[14] Sh. A. Piralishvili and V. M. Polyaev, "Flow and Thermodynamic Characteristics of Energy Separation in a
Double-Circuit Vortex Tube An Experimental
Investigation", Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
12 (1996) 399-410.
[15] Upendra Behera, P.J. Paul, K. Dinesh, S. Jacob,
"Numerical investigations on flow behaviour and energy
separation in Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube", International
Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 51 25-26 (2008) 6077-
6089.
[16] Upendra Behera, P.J. Paul, S. Kasthurirengan, R.
Karunanithi, S.N. Ram, K. Dinesh, S. Jacob, "CFD
analysis and experimental investigations towards
optimizing the parameters of Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube",
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 48
(2005) 1961–1973.
[17] Smith Eiamsa-ard, Pongjet Promvonge, "Numerical
investigation of the thermal separation in a Ranque–Hilsch
vortex tube, International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer 50 (2007) 821–832.
[18] N.F. Aljuwayhel, G.F. Nellis, S.A. Klein, "Parametric and
internal study of the vortex tube using a CFD model",
International Journal of Refrigeration 28 (2005) 442–450.
[19] Y. Cengel and M. Boles, Thermodynamics: An
Engineering Approach, 6th edition, 2007, McGraw Hill.
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/27/2014 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms