+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January...

Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January...

Date post: 29-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: rafe-harvey
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
28
Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007
Transcript
Page 1: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Asphalt Shingles in HMAMissouri DOT Experience

North Central HMA Conference

Joe Schroer, PE

January 10, 2007

Page 2: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

In The Beginning

• Approached by Pace Construction and Peerless Landfill

–MoDOT Not Using RAP in Mixtures

–Deleterious Material

–Stiffness of Asphalt in Shingles

Page 3: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

First LookThe “Ex” Factor

• Exhaustive Literature Search

• Exclusion of Tear Offs in States Allowing Manufacturing Waste

• Extra Clean Material – Contained Little Deleterious Matter

• Exceptionally Stiff Asphalt Extracted from Shingles

Page 4: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Shingle Components

• Asphalt 20%-40%

–Stiffen Roadway Asphalt

• Aggregate 30%

–Good Stuff

• Fiberglass or Paper Mat 30%

–No Harm if Well Dispersed

Page 5: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

MoDOT Goals

• Engineering Properties First–Harmful Effects of Deleterious

Material–Asphalt Binder Properties

• Traffic Safety – Nails, etc.• If Everything Else Works Out,

Landfilling is Reduced

Page 6: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Why Should We Pursue Shingles?

• High Asphalt Content

• Granules Are Hard and Durable

• Recycling CO$T

Page 7: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Concerns

• How Will Deleterious Material Affect the Mixture

• Can the Low Temperature Grading be Maintained at Various Blending Ratios

Page 8: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Asphalt After Blending with Shingle Asphalt

• Resist Rutting

• Resist Fatigue Cracking

• Resist Cold-Weather Cracking

Page 9: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Asphalt Grades

• High Temperature for Rut Resistance

• Low Temperature for Fatigue and Cold Weather Performance

Performance Graded = PG

PG 64-22 (PG Sixty-four Minus Twenty-two)

High Temp 64°C (147°F)

Low Temp –22°C (-8°F)

Page 10: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

High TemperatureCritical High Temp.

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

100 80 60 40 20 0

Percent Virgin Binder

° C

0 4 8 12 16 20

Percent Shingles @ 5% Total Binder in Mix

58-22

52-28

58-28

58-28 Flux

64

70

76

Page 11: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Low TemperatureCritical Low Temp.

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

100 80 60 40 20 0

Percent Virgin Binder

° C

0 4 8 12 16 20

Percent Shingles @ 5% Total Binder in Mix

58-22

52-28

58-28

58-28 Flux

-16

-22

-28

Page 12: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Assume Incomplete BlendingCritical Low Temp.

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

100 80 60 40 20 0

Percent Virgin Binder

° C

0 4 8 12 16 20

Percent Shingles @ 5% Total Binder in Mix

58-22

52-28

58-28

58-28 Flux

-16

-22

-28

50%

75%

100%

Page 13: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Asphalt Modifications Require PG 64-22

• Stiffer at High Temperature – OK

• Stiffer at Low Temperature

–Use Lower Percentage of Shingles

–Use Softer Roadway Asphalt

Page 14: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Deleterious Evaluation

• Specification for Aggregate

–0.5% “Other Foreign Material”

• Sticks, mud balls, deer fur, etc.

• Shingle “OFM”

–Approximately 3% Total

Page 15: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Deleterious Material

• Nails

• Wood

• Plastic

• Cellophane

• Paper

• Fiber Board

Page 16: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Trial by Fire

Page 17: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.
Page 18: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.
Page 19: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

No Difference

• Visually

• Standard Mixture Tests

• Placement

Page 20: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Big Difference

• Rut Resistance

• Cold Temperature Tests

• OFM in Mixture

Page 21: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Trial ProjectUS 61/67, St. Louis Co.

• Part of Study with Minnesota

• 4 Mixtures 19.0 mm Superpave– PG 58-28

• 20% RAP• 15% RAP, 5% Shingles

– PG 64-22• 20% RAP• 15% RAP, 5% Shingles

Page 22: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.
Page 23: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Study Results

• IDT Testing by U of Mn

–Tensile Strength Little Difference

–Creep Stiffness Greatly Affected at Lower Temperatures

• Evaluation of Reflective Cracking in Sections to Be Made

Page 24: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

10.8 12.0

19.5

9.5

34.4 34.7

0

10

20

30

40

-10C -20C -30C

Stif

fnes

s @

100

sec

20% RAPPG 64-22

15% RAP5% shing.PG 64-22

6.1

11.5

17.3

8.1

16.6

21.4

0

10

20

30

-10C -20C -30C

Stif

fnes

s @

100

sec

20% RAPPG 58-28

15% RAP5% shing.PG 58-28

4.54.9

3.94.3 4.2

4.7

0

3

6

-10C -20C -30C

Ten

sile

Str

engt

h [M

Pa]

20% RAPPG 64-22

15% RAP5% shing.PG 64-22

4.1

4.5 4.44.4 4.54.5

0

3

6

-10C -20C -30C

Ten

sile

Str

engt

h [M

Pa]

20% RAPPG 58-28

15% RAP5% shing.PG 58-28

PG 64-22 PG 58-28

Page 25: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Can Tear-Off Shingles be Used?

• Allowance in OFM Due to Small Percentage of Shingles and Trial Mixture

• Start with Softer Roadway Asphalt

Page 26: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Where Are We?The “Ex” Factor 2

• Extrinsic Material Allowance Raised–3.0% Total–1.5% Wood

• Expect PG 64-22 met w/ PG 58-28–Extra grades optional w/ testing–Examining various proportions and

asphalts• Exuberant Contractors

Page 27: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Newspaper

Plastic Bottles

Milk Jugs, Aluminum

Cardboard

Cans

Newspaper

Page 28: Asphalt Shingles in HMA Missouri DOT Experience North Central HMA Conference Joe Schroer, PE January 10, 2007.

Recommended