+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

Date post: 17-Apr-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
38
3/1/2011 1 Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks ASSE Fire Safety Virtual Symposium March 2, 2011 Ron Allen, CSP, PE - Presenter Presenter’s Experience American Society of Safety Engineers FMC Corporation Monsanto Company Fisher Controls, Inc. Emerson Electric Company Eaton Corporation Imperial Sugar Company Imperial Sugar Company Safety Turnaround Services POLL - Your Background Please indicate your level of combustible dust experience:
Transcript
Page 1: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

1

Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

ASSE Fire Safety Virtual Symposium March 2, 2011Ron Allen, CSP, PE - Presenter

Presenter’s Experience

American Society of Safety EngineersFMC CorporationMonsanto CompanyFisher Controls, Inc.Emerson Electric CompanyEaton CorporationImperial Sugar CompanyImperial Sugar CompanySafety Turnaround Services

POLL - Your Background

Please indicate your level of combustible dust experience:

Page 2: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

2

Acknowledgements

Imperial Sugar Company and Its FamiliesChil th

Chemical Safety BoardJ.M. Cholin C lt tChilworth

TechnologiesDennis GroupFluorAlston & Bird

ConsultantsFenwal Protection SystemsFireExploOSHA

DisclaimerThe information in this presentation is provided in good faith. No attempt has been made to treat the topic exhaustively. The information and advice provided in this presentation is provided solely on the basis that users will be responsible for making their own assessment of the matters discussed therein and are advised to verify all relevant representations, statements, and information.This presentation is not a substitute for any of the provisions of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, state and local regulations, or consensus standards. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the presenter.

AgendaDefinitions and Science of Combustible Dust ExplosionsCombustible Dust Statistics and IncidentsPrevailing StandardsA i Ri kAssessing RiskRisk Reduction Tools and Methodologies

EngineeringAdministrative Controls

Culture ChangeCulture Change

Personal Protective Equipment

Q&A/Discussion

Page 3: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

3

DEFINITIONS AND SCIENCE OF COMBUSTIBLE DUST

EXPLOSIONSEXPLOSIONS

Fuel Ignition

Dust Fires and Explosions

8

Dispersion/Suspension

Confinement

Oxygen

Oxygen

What Makes Dust Explosible1?Flammable or combustible characteristics

~70% of dusts qualifyOrganics, metals, otherMost inorganics, sulfates, carbonates, many halogens, and spent oxides don’t qualify

Particle size (<420 microns2)Caution: Many granular products are >420 µm but have unwanted fines that are <420 µm

1 Capable of being exploded. Considers flammability and combustibility of material.2 OSHA protocols observe 420 µm; ASTM standards require grinding and screening to 75 µm).

Page 4: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

4

Dust Deposit

Explosible Range

IH Range

Explosible Range

Source: Dust Explosions in the Process Industries, Second Edition, Rolf K Eckhoff

10-3 10-2 10-1 1 10 101 102 103 104 105 106

MASS OF POWDER/DUST PER UNIT VOLUME [g/m3]

The “Typical” Explosion Event

InitialInternal Deflagration1

ProcessEquipment

Time, msec.0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

1 Propagation of a combustion zone at a velocity that is less than the speed of sound in the unreacted medium

The “Typical” Explosion Event

InitialInternal Deflagration

Shock Wave

ProcessEquipment

Time, msec.0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

Page 5: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

5

The “Typical” Explosion EventInitialInternal Deflagration

Elastic ReboundShock Waves

ProcessEquipment

Time, msec.0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

The “Typical” Explosion EventInitialInternal Deflagration

Dust clouds causedby Elastic Rebound

Time, msec.0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

ProcessEquipment

The “Typical” Explosion EventContainment Failure from InitialDeflagration

Dust Clouds Causedby Elastic Rebound

ProcessEquipment

Time, msec.0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

Page 6: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

6

The “Typical” Explosion Event

Dust Clouds Causedby Elastic Rebound

ProcessEquipment

Secondary Deflagration Initiated

Time, msec.0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

The “Typical” Explosion Event

ProcessEquipment

Secondary DeflagrationPropagates through Interior

Time, msec.0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

The “Typical” Explosion Event

ProcessEquipment

Secondary Deflagration Vents from Structure

Time, msec.0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

Page 7: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

7

The “Typical” Explosion Event

Secondary DeflagrationCauses Collapse and Residual Fires

Time, msec.0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

Diagrams Courtesy of John M. Cholin, P.E., FSFPE, J.M. Cholin Consultants, Inc.

How Much Dust Must Be Present to Fuel a Secondary Explosion?

NFPA 654, Chapter 8, D2 Guidelines1:Limit dust layers to 1/32” thick if it exceeds 5% of the building floor area2

Dust accumulations on

Guidance can be confusing and difficult to administer. A “zero tolerance” approach is

Dust accumulations on overhead beams and joists approximate 5% of the floor area and should be considered Dust accumulations exceeding guidance can lead to stoichiometric combustion and worst case explosions OSHA enforces

20

recommended

IF YOU CAN READ THIS IT IS

CLEAN ENOUGH

LOCATION # 3 1 Definition changing2 With a bulk density of 75lb/ft3)

COMBUSTIBLE DUST INCIDENTS AND STATISTICSINCIDENTS AND STATISTICS

Page 8: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

8

A Long History with Worldwide Reach

First documented dust explosion occurred in a Turin, Italy bakery in

fl d l d Blaye, France grain storage complex explosion killed 11 in 19971785. A flour dust cloud was likely ignited by a lamp and blew the windows and their frames from the building.

Qinhuangdao, China starch plant explosion killed 19 in 2010

USA Combustible Dust Incidents 1980 to 20051

281 combustible dust fires and explosions in general industry2

44 different states affected119 workers killed718 injuredSeven of the explosions were catastrophic, involving multiple fatalities and a significant community economic impact

Under-reporting and incomplete reporting a concern

1 Source: Chemical Safety Board Report 2006-H-12 Excludes grain handling, coal mining, transportation, and non-manufacturing incidents.

Imperial Sugar – Port Wentworth, GAFebruary 7, 200814 Deaths, 38 InjuriesBroad DestructionDestructionOverheated Bearing Likely Ignited Suspended Sugar Dust

24

Page 9: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

9

Hayes Lemmerz – Huntington, INOctober 29, 20031 Death, 6 InjuriesExtensive EquipmentEquipment DamageAluminum Dust Exploded During Scrap Remelting Process

25

CTA Acoustics – Corbin, KYFebruary 20, 20037 Deaths, 37 InjuriesWidespread FacilityFacility DamagePhenolic Resin Lofted by Cleaning and Ignited by Curing Oven Flames

26

West Pharmaceutical – Kinston, NCJanuary 29, 20036 Deaths, 38 InjuriesFacility VirtuallyVirtually DestroyedDried Polyethylene Powder Accumulated Above Suspended Ceiling

27

Page 10: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

10

Rouse Polymerics – Vicksburg, MSMay 16, 20025 Deaths, 7 InjuriesRubber Dust Explosion

28

Jahn Foundry – Springfield, MAFebruary 25, 19993 Deaths, 9 InjuriesPhenolic ResinResin Explosion

29

Ford Power Plant– Dearborn, MIFebruary 1, 19996 Deaths, 30 InjuriesSecondary Explosion ofExplosion of Coal Dust

30

Page 11: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

11

Incidents/Year

Fatalities by State – 1984 - Present

MASS

MAINEMONTANA

WYOMING

IDAHO

WASHINGTON

OREGON

NEVADA

UTAH

NORTH DAKOTA

SOUTH DAKOTA

NEBRASKA

IOWA

MINNESOTA

WISCONSIN

ILLINOIS INDIANA OHIO

NEW YORK

PENNSYLVANIA

DELAWARE

NEW JERSEY

CONN

VT

NH

RI

9

611

63

1

5

3461

MICHIGAN

UTAH

CALIFORNIA

ARIZONA

COLORADO

NEW MEXICO

TEXAS

OKLAHOMA

KANSAS

ARKANSAS

MISSOURI

KENTUCKY

MISS ALABAMA GEORGIA

FLORIDA

SOUTHCAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIAWVMARYLAND

2

9

8 95

8

1

2

6

LOUISIANA

15

5

4

3

32

1

2

12

1

11

6

1

Source: 2006 CSB Dust Study

No Incidents

Known Deaths Including Since

CSB Study

Deaths Cited by CSB Study

Incidents Occur in Many Industries

Food products18%

Fabricated metal

Rubber & plastic products

7%

Equipment manufacturing

6%

Furniture & fixtures5%

33

Lumber & wood products

13%

Chemical manufacturing

12%Primary metal industries

11%

Other10%

Electric services9%

Fabricated metal products

9%

2006 CSB Dust Study

Page 12: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

12

Common Factors in Dust Explosions

Engineering controls inadequate

Dust collector and process equipment design and maintenance inadequate

Dust explosion hazard not recognized

34

Dust explosion hazard not recognized

Change management inadequate

Hazard awareness training inadequate

Rigorous housekeeping practices not applied

Source: Chemical Safety Board

Administrative

Controls

ProbabilitiesSixteen of 281 incidents

involved multiple deathsRisks present in “low volume” dust operations“What we have is a dust explosion that happened in the two dust collectors. We are not exactly sure what triggered it.”

PREVAILING STANDARDS

Page 13: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

13

General Industry Standards1910.22 - Housekeeping 1910 Subpart E - Means of Egress 1910.94 - Ventilation 1910.119 - Process Safety Management 1910.145 - Warning Signs 1910.146 - Permit-Required Confined Spaces1910.157 - Portable Fire Extinguishers 1910.176 - Handling Materials 1910.178 - Powered Industrial Trucks1910.252 - Welding, Cutting and Brazing1910.307 - Hazardous (Classified) Locations 1910.1200 - Hazard Communication 5(a)(1) - General Duty Clause

Special Industries—1910 Subpart R

1910.263 - Bakery Equipment

1910.265 - Sawmills

1910.269 - Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution (Coal Handling)

1910.272 - Grain Handling Facilities

Applicable NFPA StandardsStd Title Latest61 Standard for Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and

Food Processing Facilities2008

68 Guide for Venting of Deflagrations 2007

69 Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems 2008

70 National Electrical Code 2008

77 Recommended Practice on Static Electricity 2007y

101 Life Safety Code 2009

484 Standard for Combustible Metals 2006

499 Recommended Practice for the Classification of Combustible Dusts and of Hazardous (Classified) Locations for Electrical Installations

2008

654 Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids

20111

655 Standard for Prevention of Sulfur Fires and Explosions 2007

664 Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood Processing and Woodworking Facilities

2007

1 Not yet effective; 2006 standard observed and enforced.

Page 14: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

14

ASSESSING RISK

Is Action Needed?

1. Is the dust combustible?

41

Class II Test1

Dust properties can be used to exempt an area from electrical area classification if it can be shown that the dust explosion hazard is not significant as defined by NFPA 499 section A.4.5.2

IF

When Is Action Required?

The Ignition Sensitivity2 is less than 0.2

ANDThe Explosion Severity2 is less than 0.5

42

1 NFPA 499 reference to locations that are hazardous because of the presence of combustible dust. Further subdivided into two divisions that consider the frequency of exposure and 3 groups that consider the types of dust.2 As defined by the U.S. Bureau of Mines (see NFPA 499 section A.3.3.9). OSHA also observes this definition.

Page 15: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

15

Class II Test

The U.S. Bureau of Mines defined ignition sensitivity and explosion severity as follows:

CoalPittsburgMECMITMIES iti itI iti

][ ××

When Is Action Required? (Con’t)

If the ignition sensitivity is less than 0.2 and the explosion severity is less than 0.5, electrical area classification is not required

( )( ) CoalPittsburg

Sample

Sample

CoalPittsburg

dtdPP

dtdPP

SeverityExplosion

MECMITMIEySensitivitIgnition

][

][

][

maxmax

maxmax

×

×=

××=

43

Is Action Needed?

1. Is the dust combustible?2. Are dust accumulations present?

44

Presence of Dust – Nothing’s EasyAccessible and inaccessible surfaces, crevices, enclosures

Fine dusts can take extended time to settle and may travel vast differences (e.g., 3µm particles of sugar descend ~5’/minute in undisturbed atmospheres)Consider highest surfacesConsider interior and exterior surfaces of ductwork and processConsider interior and exterior surfaces of ductwork and process equipmentMultiple samples may be needed to properly characterize and consider representative accumulations

Air filtration devices criticalSample from “dirty side” of filters

Sample size: ≥ 2 kg

Page 16: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

16

Is Action Needed?

1. Is the dust combustible?2. Are dust accumulations present?3 Wh t th b tibl d t

46

3. What are the combustible dust characteristics?

How Explosible is the Dust?Ignition Sensitivity

Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE)Minimum Ignition Temperature (MIT)

Explosion SeverityMaximum Explosion Pressure (PMax)Maximum Rate of Pressure Rise ([dp/dt]Max)Dust Deflagration Index (KSt)

Dust ConcentrationMinimum Explosible Concentration (MEC)Lower Oxygen Concentration (LOC)

Electrostatic Charging TendencyChargeability, resistivity, conductivity

Moisture Content (Including Relative Humidity)

Strength of ExplosionClass KSt (bar m/s) Characteristic

ST 0 0 No explosion

ST 1 1 - 200 Weak explosion

48

p

ST 2 201 - 300 Strong explosion

ST 3 > 300 Very strong explosion

Page 17: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

17

Is Action Needed?

1. Is the dust combustible?2. Are dust accumulations present?3 Wh t th b tibl d t

49

3. What are the combustible dust characteristics?

4. What preventative and mitigating actions are needed?

It’s Probably Not A Single Solution . . .

Mitigating ActionsMitigating Actions

Engineering

Administrative Controls

Personal Protective Equipment

Mitigating Actions

. . . and you may never be finished

Engineering

Administrative Controls

Personal Protective Equipment

Mitigating Actions

Prevention

REDUCING RISK THROUGH ENGINEERINGENGINEERING

Page 18: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

18

Dust Fires and Explosions

Fuel Ignition

52

OxygenDispersion/Suspension

Confinement

Oxygen

Reduce or Eliminate FuelProcess Design

ConveyanceMinimize inventoriesBatch vs. continuousRaw materials

Minimize Plane Surfaces or Hidden Accumulation Areas*Design for Maintenance & Housekeeping*Wet Dust Collectors*

Reduce spillage

Sealed EquipmentNon-Combustible Building Materials*Physical Separation & Isolation*

Local Exhaust Ventilation*Central Vacuum Systems*Monitor for Dust Accumulation*

* Examples forthcoming

Non-Combustible Building Materials

Poured Isolation Walls w/ 3 Hour Fire Ratings

Intumescent Coated Structural Members

Page 19: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

19

Physical Separation & Isolation

1

2

55

1. Silo Segregated from High Occupancy Areas

2. Ceilings and Walls Sealed (also easily cleaned)

3. Utility Areas Separated by Walk-On Ceiling

3

Central Vacuum System

1. Beveled Surfaces2. Central Vacuum3. Tapered Sills4 Beam caps

Minimize Plane Surfaces + Central Vacuum Systems

1

2

4. Beam caps

56

3

4

Packaging Wet Dust CollectorsWet Dust Collectors

57

Page 20: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

20

Design for Housekeeping

Other ConsiderationsAccessCl i i t

Oscillating Fan/Blower

Cleaning equipmentConcealed areas

High Level & Choke MonitorsInterlockedValidatedT t d

Monitoring for Dust Accumulation

TestedMaintained

Closed Circuit TV

Dust Fires and Explosions

Fuel Ignition

60

OxygenDispersion/Suspension

Confinement

Oxygen

Page 21: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

21

Control or Eliminate Ignition SourcesProcess Design & Control

Heated surfacesIndirect heatLowest possible temperatures

Classified Electricals*

Properly Rated Industrial Trucks*Non-Sparking Equipment Components*

BucketsFan bladesClassified Electricals*

Study needed

Electrical Grounding and Bonding*

Buildings & Equipment

Monitors with Alarms & Interlocked Shutdowns*

Bearing temperatureElevator speedElevator belt alignment

Fan bladesFlightsDucts

Tramp Metal*ScreensMagnetsDetectors

* Examples forthcoming

Electrical ClassificationEngineering Study NeededCareful DocumentationMay Include “Bubbles”Cl II C t fClass II Components for Appropriate Division and Group

Electrical Grounding & Bonding

Transportation Protection

63Railcar and Truck Grounding Systems

Page 22: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

22

Building and Floor Grounding & Testing

64

Static Dissipative Floor Test Connection Testing Equipment

Bearing Temperature

Heat Generation Monitoring Equipment

Must be:• Interlocked• Alarmed• Tested• Maintained

Speed Switch Monitor

Belt Alignment Switches

Properly Rated Industrial Trucks

66

Page 23: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

23

Non-Sparking Process Components

Synthetic Buckets Aluminum Fan Blades

Magnetic Control

Tramp Metal Control

Metal Detectors Mechanical Screens

Dust Fires and Explosions

Fuel Ignition

69

OxygenDispersion/Suspension

Confinement

Oxygen

Page 24: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

24

Control or Eliminate Confinement

Process ReviewEliminate or seal unnecessary enclosures (e.g., false ceilings, concealed areas)

Process Design*P tiPneumatic conveyanceLocal exhaust ventilationMonitoring and alarms

Fortify Confinement*Prevents propagationReduces structural damageAllows relief devices to function

* Examples forthcoming

Pneumatic ConveyanceMinimize Screws and ScrollsControl Fines

Dense Phase Conveying: Comparison

Control FinesPneumatic Conveyance Options

Click here for a video demonstration…

Local Exhaust VentilationTransportation Protection Must be:

• Engineered• Interlocked• Alarmed• Tested• Maintained

72

Truck Loading Dust Collection Packaging LEV

Page 25: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

25

Fortify Containment Areas

73

Dust Fires and Explosions

Fuel Ignition

74

OxygenDispersion/Suspension

Confinement

Oxygen

Reduce Oxidant LevelsBasics

Guidance in NFPA 69Common gas inerts1: N, CO2, ArUnlikely to propagate <8% oxidant concentration; can be

Gas Inerting MethodsPressure purgingVacuum purgingFlow through purgingPartial purging in combination with other layer(s) of safety

effective as high as 16%Must know LOC (Limit of Oxygen Concentration) for specific productMust know properties of oxidant and inertantNot a candidate for many combustible dust processes (examples of exceptions – coal pulverizers and mills, metal dust transferring and blending)

y ( ) y

PrecautionsUnsafe for human occupancyContinuous monitoringSafety factor (60% LOC limit if not monitored)

1 Can also inert with solids

Page 26: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

26

Dust Fires and Explosions

Fuel Ignition

76

OxygenDispersion/Suspension

Confinement

Oxygen

Reduce Dispersion and Suspension

Sealed Process and EquipmentLocal Exhaust VentilationControl Product TransfersAdd Moisture*Limit Agitation

* Examples forthcoming

Reduce Dispersion and Suspension

Water Cannon Dust Mister Components

Page 27: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

27

Dust Fires and Explosions

Fuel Ignition

79

OxygenDispersion/Suspension

Confinement

Oxygen

Mitigation Techniques

Mechanical Isolation*Chemical Suppression & Isolation*Pressure Relief*Pressure ReliefLife Safety Considerations*Fire Suppression Systems*

* Examples forthcoming

Suppression and Isolation

Rotary Valves

Mechanical Isolation

81

Quick Closing Valves

Page 28: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

28

Chemical Isolation

Chemical Isolation and Suppression

83

Chemical Isolation and Suppression – Con’t

Isolation

Suppression agents: •Sodium Bicarbonate•Monammonium Phosphate

84

SuppressionCombination

Page 29: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

29

Isolation Techniques

Pressure Relief Devices

86

Deluge and Water/Steam Suppression Systems

87

“Fire Fly”

Traditional Deluge

Page 30: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

30

Don’t Be Discouraged

Some Progress Is Always Better Than No ProgressPersistence PrevailsPersistence Prevails

REDUCING RISK THROUGH ADMINSTRATIVE CONTROLSADMINSTRATIVE CONTROLS

Administrative Tools

Changing the Culture*Training*Housekeeping Requirements and

Reporting Mechanisms*Contractors and Visitors*Process HazardRequirements and

Audits*Inspections*Incident Investigation* Equipment Standards*Preventative Maintenance*

Process Hazard Assessments*MSDS*Warning Signs*

* Examples forthcoming

Page 31: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

31

Changing the Culture for Combustible Dust Safety

Demonstrate LeadershipActions and wordsChoices

Measurable Policies and Procedures

Investment and ExecutionIncident Investigation*Visibility and Communication

Training and knowledge*Postings

Housekeeping*Equipment shutdownInspections and audits*Hot workZero tolerance*

IntegrationSOPsPMs*MoCPHAs*

Meeting reference

Involvement and OwnershipEmpowerTeamsContractors*Reporting mechanisms*

* Examples forthcoming

TrainingAll Levels of Organization

Tailoring requiredVary content to audienceInclude contractors

NFPA 654 Requirement“ l d ” d“Knowledge” required

Periodic Refresher (Annual or When Process Change Occurs)Supervisory ReinforcementComputer Based Training (CBT) a Convenience

Summary of NFPA 654 Required Training Topics

(1) Hazards of their workplace(2) General orientation, including plant safety rules(3) Process description(4) Equipment operation, safe startup and shutdown, and response to

upset conditions(5) The necessity for proper functioning of related fire and explosion(5) The necessity for proper functioning of related fire and explosion

protection systems(6) Equipment maintenance requirements and practices(7) Housekeeping requirements(8) Emergency response plans

The employer shall certify annually that the training and review required have been completed.

Page 32: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

32

HousekeepingBeyond Common SenseDocumentation Required

AccountabilityAudit

Area and equipment specificRequired

DefinitionsCleaning schedule and proceduresTailoring neededDisposal methodsPhotos of good/bad examples useful

pImmediate actionQuantify results & trendCorrective action plansMANAGE

Housekeeping ExamplesGood Bad

Summary of NFPA 654 Housekeeping Requirements

Regular cleaning frequencies shall be established for walls, floors, and horizontal surfaces (lengthy list of examples).Surfaces shall be cleaned in a manner that minimizes the generation of dust clouds.Vigorous sweeping or blowing down with steam or compressed air produces dust clouds and shall be permitted only where the following requirements are met:(1) Area and equipment shall be vacuumed prior to blowdown.(2) Electrical equipment not suitable for Class II locations and other sources of

ignition shall be shut down or removed from the area.(3) Only low-pressure steam or compressed air, not exceeding a gauge

pressure of 15 psi.(4) No hot surfaces or flames capable of igniting a dust cloud or layer shall

exist in the area.

Only Class II vacuum cleaners permitted.

Page 33: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

33

Cleaning ToolsWet MethodsCarbon-Impregnated brushes availableN C d tiNon-Conductive Shovels and ToolsClass II Approved Vacuum Cleaners

Air poweredElectrically powered

Inspections and Actions

•Consider Actions and Conditions•Employee Involvement•Rely on All Senses•Ask “Why?”•Document & Correct

Incident Investigation

Near miss = exceedance of NFPA accumulation limitsLocal definitions of “reportable releases” ( b k FIBC t b k b f il d(e.g., broken FIBC, two broken bags, failed dust collector)Team approachDisciplined problem solving methodsRecommendations consider design, SOPs, maintenance, and training

Page 34: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

34

Reporting Mechanisms

PrimaryEmpowermentImmediate action

SecondarySupervisorHot LineSuggestion BoxSafety CommitteeRecognition Program

Contractors and Visitors

Define Training Requirements by Tasks Performed

Equally intensive as employee trainingq y p y g

Specify Compliance and Code Requirements or ReferencesHire for Success

Process Hazard AnalysesProcess:

Logic based analysis of each process and sub-process that could harbor, transfer, or produce combustible dust

NFPA 654:The design of the fire and explosion safety provisions shall be based on a process hazard analysis of the facility, the process, and the

Multidisciplinary

RigorousCorrective Actions Documented

associated fire or explosion hazards.Repeat every 5 years

Common Findings:Additional samplingRedesignMitigationProcedures and training

Page 35: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

35

OSHA HazCom Guidance –August 2008

“Regarding dusts and other particulates, a hazard evaluation must be conducted taking into consideration all discernible hazards, including that of explosibility. It is incumbent upon manufacturers and importers to provide information on the potential for and control of combustible dusts.”pote t a o a d co t o o co bust b e dusts“This evaluation of hazards ensures that downstream employers and workers are provided MSDSs with complete and accurate information regarding dust explosion hazards, appropriate information is included on labels, and that workers are properly trained regarding workplace combustible dust hazards.”

Section 5: FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES

This material can form explosible dust/air suspensions that are ignitable under some conditions. Dust accumulations should be avoided to prevent secondary dust explosions. Avoid generating dust; fine dust dispersed in air in sufficient concentrations, and in the presence of an ignition source, is a potential dust explosion hazard. Refer to NFPA 61 for procedures regarding fire and explosion hazards relating to sugar dust.

Suitable Extinguishing Media: Class A stored-pressure wet-water or water-mist extinguishers or extinguishing media that are appropriate for the surrounding fire and materials.

Unsuitable Extinguishing Media: Avoid use of pressurized dry-chemical extinguishers on powdered materials to prevent dust suspensions and dust explosion hazards. Hose streams should be used with great care to avoid creating dust clouds. Fog nozzles should be used.

Section 6: ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES

Methods for Clean-Up: Airborne sugar dust may form explosible dust clouds and dust accumulations should be avoided to prevent secondary dust explosions. Sugar dust can accumulate on floors, equipment, and overhead structural members and can become airborne, and accordingly must be removed concurrently with operations. Avoid dispersal of dust in the air (i.e., clearing dust surfaces with compressed air). Non-sparking tools should be used. Sugar dust should not be allowed to accumulate in quantities that when suspended could create an atmosphere above the Minimum Explosible Concentration (MEC) of 50 to 60 g/m3. Spills should be cleaned up and dust accumulations should be removed promptly. Surfaces should be cleaned in a manner that minimizes the generation of dust clouds. Refer to NFPA 61 for procedures regarding fire and explosion hazards relating to sugar dust.

Section 7: HANDLING AND STORAGE

Section 1: PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Section 2: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION – WARNING

WARNING! MAY FORM COMBUSTIBLE DUST CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR

Explosion: This material is friable and can create small dust particles during any handling, processing, and transfer operations. This material can form explosible dust/air suspensions that are ignitable under some conditions. Dust accumulations should be avoided to prevent secondary dust explosions.

Fire: Sugar is a combustible material and could contribute to a fire, once started and, therefore, normal fire prevention practices should be followed.

Imperial Sugar Company P.O. Box 9 Sugar Land, TX 77487-0009 www.imperialsugar.com (Brands: Imperial Sugar, Dixie Crystals, Holly Sugar, Colonial and Evercane)

Imperial Sugar Company: (800) 727-8427 Plant Emergency: (281) 491-9181 (8am to 5pm, Central Time Zone, Monday to Friday)

Product Name: Granulated Sugar Trade Names/Synonyms: Sucrose, Sugar, Cane Sugar, A Coarse, Fine Sanding, Bakers Special, Fruit Granulated, Medium Granulated, Extra Fine Granulated

Issue Date: 09/01/2009 Supersedes Date: January 2008

Reference to

MSDS for Granulated Sugar

104

Section 7: HANDLING AND STORAGE

Precautions to be taken in Handling and Storing: Airborne sugar dust may form explosible dust clouds. To minimize dust generation and accumulation, spills should be cleaned up, and, dust accumulations should be removed promptly.

Other precautions: Provide adequate (local exhaust) ventilation to prevent the spread of dust clouds. Dry powders can build static electricity charges when subjected to the friction of transfer and mixing operations. Provide adequate precautions, such as electrical grounding and bonding, or inert atmospheres. Avoid all potential ignition sources including smoking, open flames, static electricity and sparks in areas where airborne sugar dust may be possible. Ensure that electrical equipment meets the Class II, Group G classification for sugar-handling areas, particularly where dusts having average particle sizes less than 400 microns could be released or could accumulate.

Employ effective housekeeping practices and exhaust ventilation, electrostatic grounding of all metal equipment and operators, management of electrical devices, maintenance of mechanical equipment (e.g. mills, rotary valves, screw feeders, conveyors, and elevators), and explosion protection and isolation provisions in accord with accepted engineering practices in any process capable of generating dust. Refer to applicable NFPA standards including:

NFPA 61 “Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Products Facilities” NFPA 68 “Guide for Venting of Deflagrations” NFPA 69 “Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems” NFPA 70 “National Electrical Code (NEC)” NFPA 77 “Recommended Practice on Static Electricity” NFPA 499 “Recommended Practice for the Classification of Combustible Dusts and of Hazardous (Classified) Locations for Electrical Installations in Chemical Process Areas”

NFPA 101 "Life Safety Code" NFPA 654 “Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids" NFPA 2112 “Standard on Flame-Resistant Garments for Protection of Industrial Personnel Against Flash Fire” NFPA 2113 “Standard on Selection, Care, Use, and Maintenance of Flame-Resistant Garments for Protection of Industrial Personnel Against Flash Fire”

Seek expert advice regarding dust cloud explosion prevention and protection measures.

Effects of Overexposure: Prolonged exposure to nuisance dust could result in temporary, reversible respiratory irritation. Prolonged contact may cause skin sensitization or inflammation (reddening, scaling, or itching). No other effects have been reported in humans.

This product does not contain any carcinogens or potential carcinogens as listed by OSHA, IARC or NTP.

Section 3: COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS

Component CAS No. % by Wt. Sucrose 57-50-1 100%

β-D-fructofuranosyl-α-D-glucopyranoside Formula: C12H22O11 Chemical Family: Carbohydrate Description: Odorless, hygroscopic, dry, white crystals with a sweet taste Melting Point: 365°F (185°C) Bulk Density: 49-56 Lbs./Cu.Ft. Solubility in Water: 200 gm per100 ml @ 20°C Percent Moisture by Weight: 0.05 Specific Rotation: (Not Less Than +65.9) @ 20°C & 589.44 ηm (c=26) Specific Gravity: 1.59 (H2O = 1) Molecular Weight: 342.3

Section 4: FIRST AID MEASURES

Emergency and First Aid Procedures: Ingestion: If swallowed in large amounts and the person is conscious, immediately give large amounts water. Get medical attention. Inhalation: If a person inhales a large amount of sugar dust, move the exposed person to fresh air. Get medical attention. Eye Contact: Wash the affected area with large amounts of water for at least 15 minutes and obtain medical attention. Skin Contact: Wash the affected area with large amounts of water for 15 minutes.

Conspicuous warnings about combustible and explosible properties

applicable NFPA standards

Material Safety Data SheetsSection 9: PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES The following guidance is given concerning the properties and usage of Extra Fine Granulated (EFG) sugar:

PROPERTY [and approximate values]

FINE a FRACTION [8% smaller

than 75 microns]

COARSE b FRACTION [50% larger

than 450 microns] Minimum Ignition Energy [MIE] 4 millijoules 10 joules

Minimum Ignition Temperature [MIT] 350 oC 370 oC Minimum Explosible Concentration [MEC] 55 g./cu.m. 65 g./cu.m.

Maximum Explosion Pressure [Pmax] 9.0 barg; 130 psig 5.9 barg; 85 psig Deflagration Index [Kst] 140 bar-m/sec. 35 bar-m/sec. Resistivity (ohm-meters) 1012 1012

NOTES: a – Locations where the fine-fraction data would be applicable: within dry dust collectors; for accumulations on elevated surfaces; in exhaust-ventilation ducts; in downlegs of bucket elevators; in dilute-phase pneumatic conveyors; in head spaces in blenders and mixers; in trucks and railcars during loading; in bags, drums, FIBCs, bins, and silos during filling. b – Locations where the coarse-fraction data may be applicable: during bottom unloading from trucks and railcars; during dumping

Section 8: EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION Exposure Limits: OSHA PEL = 15 mg/m3 (Total Dust), 5 mg/m3 (Respirable Dust)

ACGIH TLV = As Sucrose, 10 mg/m3, 3 mg/m3 (Respirable); A4 Not classified as a human carcinogen

NIOSH REL = TWA 10 mg/m3 (Total Dust), TWA 5 mg/m3 (Respirable Dust) LD50 = 29.7 g/kg (oral, rat)

Establish and maintain good housekeeping practices. Follow dust control practices outlined in NFPA 61, “Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities.” Accumulated dust on floors, structural members, and other surfaces should be removed concurrently with operations.

Respiratory Protection: Local exhaust ventilation or other site specific engineering controls are recommended if visible dust emissions are present. Please refer to the ACGIH document, Industrial Ventilation, A Manual of Recommended Practices, most recent edition, for details. If dusty conditions exist, wear appropriate respiratory protection based on industrial hygiene exposure monitoring assessment until engineering controls reduce dust concentrations to an acceptable level If the exposure

Reference coarse fraction and fine fraction particles

Reference explosion

MSDS for Granulated Sugar

105

b Locations where the coarse fraction data may be applicable: during bottom unloading from trucks and railcars; during dumping from hoppers, bins, bags, and FIBCs; on belt conveyors; in screw conveyors; in dense-phase pneumatic conveyors; and in elevator buckets. a and b – Locations where intermediate values of the data could be applicable, depending on the dispersability or stickiness of the materials and the extent of segregation of the fine and coarse fractions: in rotary driers and coolers; in mixers, blenders, and tumblers; and at transitions between conveying systems, such as belt conveyors, bucket elevators, screw conveyors, and chutes. Caution: Dust cloud explosion properties are very dependent on particle properties such as average particle size, particle-size distribution, particle shape, and moisture content. Therefore, if the as-received physical or chemical properties are modified by the user – during handling or processing – and if such dusts are accumulated in cyclones or dust collectors, it is important that explosibility data be obtained from tests on representative samples of the modified material.

Section 10: STABILITY AND REACTIVITY Stability: Stable under normal temperatures and pressures.

Conditions to Avoid: Keep away from heat, sparks and flames.

Incompatible Materials (Materials to Avoid): Strong oxidizers, such as potassium permanganate, potassium chlorate, potassium nitrate, potassium perchlorate, and nitric acid. Strongly hydrophilic liquids such as sulfuric acid can release carbon monoxide upon contact with sugar. Carbon dioxide, flammable aldehyde, and carbon monoxide may form when heated to decomposition, or heated with strong, concentrated alkalis. This reaction is exothermic.

Hazardous Decomposition Products: Thermal decomposition, at temperatures in excess of 365°F, may release flammable gases and acrid fumes and smoke, including aldehydes, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and steam. If confined, the decomposition gases can exert considerable pressure.

Polymerization: Will not occur.

assessment until engineering controls reduce dust concentrations to an acceptable level. If the exposure limit is exceeded and engineering controls are not feasible, a half face elastomeric respirator (with NIOSH type N95 filters or better) or NIOSH approved disposable particulate respirator (filtering facepiece or dust mask) may be worn for up to ten times the exposure limit. A full-face elastomeric respirator (with NIOSH type N100 filters) may be worn up to 50 times the exposure limit. If oil particles are present or suspected to be present, use a NIOSH type R100 or P100 filter. For emergencies or instances where the exposure levels are not known, use a full-face positive-pressure, air-supplied respirator. Air-purifying respirators do not protect workers in oxygen-deficient atmospheres. If employees are required to wear respirators, they should be included in a written respirator program, trained in the use of respirators, medically qualified to wear respirators, and fit-tested to ensure proper fit of the respirator worn.

Other Protective Clothing or Equipment: Protective clothing and gloves are not required for ordinary operations but may be desirable from a sanitation aspect. Eye protection is recommended to avoid eye irritation. Where dusty conditions are unavoidable, flame-resistant, antistatic outer clothing and conductive shoes should be worn and used.

It is recommended that all dust control equipment such as local exhaust ventilation and material transport systems involved in handling of this product contain explosion relief vents or an explosion suppression system or an oxygen-deficient environment. Ensure that dust-handling systems (such as exhaust ducts, dust collectors, vessels, and processing equipment) are designed in a manner to prevent the escape of dust into the work area. Use only appropriately classified electrical equipment and appropriately rated powered industrial trucks.

pprotection equipment

Page 36: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

36

Warning Signs

CAUTION

Classified Hazardous Location

Class II, Division 2, Group EMetal Blender

No Open Flames, Spark Producing Equipment , or

Electrical Equipment That Does Not Meet Class II, Division 1,

Group E Requirements(including Cell Phones)

Procedures & Equipment Standards

ProceduresNFPA 654

Operating and maintenance proceduresEmergency procedures

Equipment StandardsDust collectorsBlendersMillsS llEmergency procedures

Management of ChangeHot Work

OtherSee Equipment Standards

ScrollsSilosPackaging equipmentEtc.

NFPA 654 on Preventative MaintenanceGeneral

MoC considerationTraining & knowledgeRecords maintainedTypes of equipment:

(1) Fire and explosion protection and

Specific:Material feeding devicesAir-moving devicesAir–material separatorsAbort gates and abort dampersFire and explosion protection(1) Fire and explosion protection and

prevention equipment in accordance with the applicable NFPA standards

(2) Dust control equipment(3) Housekeeping(4) Potential ignition sources(5) Electrical, process, and mechanical

equipment, including process interlocks(6) Process changes(7) Lubrication of bearings

Fire and explosion protection systems

Page 37: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

37

Screw Conveyor PM Considerations

Document Operating ParametersMaximum RPMTemperature profileLubrication

PM ScheduleManufacturers’ recommendationsConsensus standardsExperienceLubrication

requirementsVariation in screw diameterMinimum clearance between screw and trough

Experience Actions

Unusual noiseHot spots (>4º F variation)Reduced gap between screw and troughPhysical damage

REDUCING RISK THROUGH PERSONAL PROTECTIVEPERSONAL PROTECTIVE

EQUIPMENT

Personal Protective EquipmentOSHA 1910.132Careful consideration of garment styles and ratingsPractical consideration and experienceNFPA 654 id d/ id iNFPA 654 considered/considering changes: :

Requirement for operating and maintenance procedures to address PPE for tasks involving processing and handling of combustible dusts, including:

a) PPE shall include flame-resistant garments in accordance with the workplace hazard assessment required by NFPA 2113; and

b) Where a dust deflagration hazard exists, flame-resistant garments shall be required for all exposed personnel.

Page 38: Assessing and Managing Combustible Dust Risks

3/1/2011

38

PPE Static Protection ConsiderationsRisk Greatest with Low MIE Materials (>25 mJ) + High Probability of Dust Cloud (e.g., Class II, Division 1)Workers Can Generate And Accumulate Electrostatic Charge B

SD Shoe and Glove Programs Can Be Complicated to Administer

By:Clothing changes (including outer garments)Pouring or dumping materialsContact with equipment or material charged by movement of belts, powders, or dustWalking or working on non-conductive flooring with non-conductive shoes

Other Situations Where Static Differential Exists

DISCUSSION AND Q&A

Further Questions?

Contact Ron Allen at 269-649-0463 or [email protected]

NOTES


Recommended